我国不同类型地区现代林业的差别性政策研究
|
摘要
当前我国正处于全面建设小康社会的攻坚阶段,其重点和难点是农村,社会主义新农村建设意义重大。新农村建设涉及到方方面面,现代林业建设是其中的重要内容,对于推进新农村建设具有巨大作用。多年来,林业在改善农村生态环境、促进农村经济发展、扩大就业和促进农民增收方面做出了积极而重大的贡献。
经过建国60年来的改革与发展,我国经济社会发展迅猛,已经基本进入工业化中期阶段。但是受城乡二元体制等多种因素的影响,我国城乡发展差距巨大,林业成为弱质产业,林农成为弱势群体。如何尽快摆脱林业资源危机、林业经济危困以及林农贫穷的局面,如何紧紧围绕社会主义新农村建设的总体目标,加速推进传统林业向现代林业转变,着力构建发达的林业生态体系、林业产业体系和林业生态文化体系,建设繁荣的生态文明,增加农民收入,助推农村早日实现全面小康社会,是一个亟待解决的难题。
我国地域辽阔,有61.2万个行政村,2859个县级单位,各地自然禀赋差别很大,地区发展很不平衡,现代林业的发展也不够协调,全国采用一刀切的林业政策显然不科学。但是目前我国的林业政策大多是全国统一的,地区差异性体现的不够突出,亟待提出差别性的林业政策,以便指导各地的现代林业发展。
本文的理论框架设计思路:首先根据区域差异论研究我国各地区区域经济的差异点,进而初步确定区域差异调控的途径,即重点扶持欠发达区域经济发展,一般支持发达地区经济的继续发展,并积极促进发达区域与欠发达区域增强经济联系,发挥发达区域对欠发达区域的带动作用;然后根据林业经济区划的理论,对全国县级单位进行分类;接着根据区域产业布局理论设计了不同地区的林业生产布局。其中包含三个方面的布局:林业生态体系布局、林业产业体系布局、林业生态文化布局;最后给出每个地区的区域政策。主要是区域的经济政策,其中包括林业的公共财政政策、林业的金融支持政策等,还有区域的科技政策、人才政策等。
本研究按照分类指导的思路,以县域林业为研究对象,以2006年县域农民人均纯收入为主要分类指标,将全国的县级单位划分为五类地区:发达地区、相对发达地区、中等发展地区、相对滞后地区和滞后地区,通过剖析五类地区区域经济的差异性、林业建设取得的经验、今后现代林业建设面临的困难等,从而研究出适合不同地区的林业政策。
本论文研究意义重大:第一,有利于国家根据不同地区现代林业的特点调整宏观政策,将有限的资源科学配置给不同地区,为国家从宏观上制定相应可行的林业政策具有重要的理论依据。第二,有利于不同地区根据本地特点采取可操作性的林业政策,因地制宜发展现代林业,推进新农村建设全面小康社会。
本文研究出了五类地区在林业生态体系、林业产业体系、林业生态文化体系的不同布局,还提出财政、金融、科技、人才等方面相应的保障措施,现列举几个重要结论。
主要结论之一:从林业生态体系的布局看
第一,发达地区。该地区多地处沿海地带,其主要的生态建设任务是:以沿海防护林建设工程为重点,夯实万里海疆的绿色屏障。第二,相对发达地区。该地区主要分布在大中城市郊区,其主要任务是:以城乡一体化林业生态建设为重点,城乡统筹建设和谐林业。第三,中等发展地区。该地区主要集中在我国的粮食主产区,其主要任务是:以保护基本农田的林业工程为重点加强林业生态建设,构筑农业稳产高产的生态安全屏障。第四,相对滞后地区。该地区主要分布在中西部生态脆弱的地区。其主要任务是:以国家林业重点工程为重点,扶持构建完备的林业生态体系。第五,滞后地区。该地区主要分布在中西部老、少、边、库区,尤其以水源区居多。其主要任务是:以重点水源区的林业建设为重点,加大对生态建设的扶持力度。
主要结论之二:从林业产业体系的布局看
第一,发达地区发展林业产业的思路是:以优化提升林业产业结构为重点,努力打造新型林业产业格局。第二,相对发达地区发展林业产业的思路是:以林产品加工业为重点,打造林业特色产业集群,加快高效益林业产业体系建设。第三,中等发展地区发展林业产业的思路是:以商品林基地建设为重点,全面发展林业产业,增加国内林产品后备资源储备。第四,相对滞后地区发展林业产业的思路是:以木本粮油为重点,建设“名、优、新”的特色林业产业体系。第五,滞后地区发展林业产业的思路是:以生态旅游为扶持重点,全面提升林业产业对新农村的贡献率。
主要结论之三:从林业生态文化体系的布局看
第一,发达地区。其思路是:以加强生态文化体系的基础研究为重点,夯实林业生态文化体系的基石。第二,相对发达地区。其思路是:以生态文化创意产业为重点,打造林业生态文化品牌体系。第三,中等发展地区。其思路是:以提升生态文化产业层次为重点,形成具有鲜明地区特色的生态文化产业群。第四,相对滞后地区。其思路是:以加强生态文化体系的保障能力为重点,扶持构建新农村生态文化体系。第五,滞后地区。其思路是:以抢救保护与科学开发相结合为重点,扶持构建具有民族特色的生态文化体系。
主要结论之四:从公共财政政策和政府林业投入的角度看
总体上说,我国要建立以公共财政为主的多元化林业投入长效机制,加大国家公共财政的投入力度,提高政府对林业的投资水平,促进林业的可持续和快速发展。基于地区的不同区情,中央财政和地方财政所起的作用有所不同,应对各个地区实行差别性的公共财政政策,中央财政的扶持力度从高到低依次是:滞后地区、相对滞后地区、中等发展地区、相对发达地区、发达地区。
五类地区具体的公共财政政策与政府林业投入建议:第一,发达地区。中央政府要按照“放活”的原则,对该地区林业改革与发展的先行先试给予投入上的大力支持。地方政府要大幅度加大对林业的投入,逐步建立与本级财政相适应的,与其他行业协调发展的,支持林业现代化早日实现的林业投入体系。第二,相对发达地区:国家要按照“放活”和“少取”的原则,对该地区城乡统筹建设现代林业给予投入上的大力支持。地方政府要大幅度加大对林业的投入,积极调整财政的城乡支出结构,逐步建立支持城乡一体化林业发展的林业投入体系。第三,中等发展地区。国家要按照“少取”和“多予”的原则,逐步增加中央财政的投入。地方政府要在国家适当扶持的基础上,着力增加对林业的投入,努力建立以公共财政为主的多元化投入机制。第四,相对滞后地区。国家应按照“少取”和“多予”的原则,大幅度加大对该地区林业建设的投入力度,地方政府也要积极增加对林业的投入,逐步构建完善的林业支持保护体系。第五,滞后地区。国家应当按照“多予”的原则,结合扶贫工程,大幅度加大对该地区林业建设的投入力度,地方政府也要努力增加对林业的投入,逐步构建助推林业发展和林农脱贫致富的林业投入体系。
本文的创新点:
1)林业经济区划创新。本文没有沿袭传统的自然区划或林业区划,创造性地按照农民收入对全国县级单位分类,这样有利于研究在现代林业建设中的林农增收问题。
2)林业生产布局创新。有别于传统地按照林种来布局林业生产的方式,本文按照林业生态体系、林业产业建设和林业生态文化体系进行布局。
3)林业区域政策创新。创造性地提出不同区域的差异性的林业政策,尤其是指出中央政府对各类地区现代林业建设的不同支持力度和支持重点,有利于国家将有限的资源进行科学配置,为政府制定宏观政策提供理论参考。
Our country is in the crucial stage of building a well-off society in an all-round way. To construct the well-off society, the key and the difficulty is the countryside. So the construction of new socialist countryside is of great significance. The new rural construction involves many aspects, and modern forestry construction is an important part of it. For many years, the forestry has made an important contribution to improve rural ecological environment.
After 60 years’developing, with the rapid development of economy and society in China, from the overall view, China has entered the mid-term stage of industrialization when the industry finances agriculture and the city promotes the countryside. Under the traditional urban-rural dual system for many years, the urban-rural disparity is more and more large. Forestry becomes a weak industry and foresters become the vulnerable group. It is urgent to solve that how to break away from recoverable resources crisis and economic depression, how to turn the traditional forestry to the modern forestry, how to build developed conservation culture, how to increase farmers’income and how to achieve an all-round well-to-do society in the countryside as soon as possible.
China has large territory and has 61.2 ten thousand administrative villages and 2859 counties. The difference of natural endowments is very big and district development is not balanced, so it is obviously not scientific that adopting unified forestry policies. But most forestry policies in China are unified and they should not incarnate the difference of many areas. In order to carry out classification guidance to modern forestry, it is imperative to study different forestry policy for all kinds of regions.
Following the thinking that coordinative development of urban and rural areas and classification guidance, we regard county economy as the object of study and take per capita net income of farmers as the standard. Then all counties in China are divided to five types of regions:developed regions, relative developed regions, medium developed regions, less developed regions and undeveloped regions. By analyzing the difference of many regions, experience and lesson achieved from construction in forestry, we have developed different forestry policie fit for many types of region.
The study is of great importance: Firstly, it is beneficial for the Chinese government to adjust timely macro-economic policy according to the difference of regions and disposal of resource scientifically. Secondly, it is beneficial for local government to adopt operational forestry policies and tailor measures to suit local conditions.
This paper has work out allocation in forestry ecosystem, forestry industrial system and ecological culture system. In addition, we bring forward some feasible measures in finances, science and technology, talented person and so on. Here are some important conclusions.
1. Layout of forestry ecosystem
1)In developed regions:This region is mainly located in the coastal areas, so it should focus on the coastal shelterbelts project. 2)About relative developed regions:This region is mainly located in suburbs of large and medium-sized cities, so it should focus on forestry ecology construction of urban-rural integration. 3)About midium developed regions: This region is mainly located in midlands where major grain producing areas lie in, so it should focus on keywords forestry engineering for protection of basic farmland. 4)About less developed regions: This region is mainly located in ecological friable areas of the West and the midlands, so it should focus on National Key Forestry Programs to build strong forestry ecosystem. 5)About undeveloped regions: This region is mainly located in the old, sparse, frontier, and poor mountain areas, so it should focus on forestry engineering of the key water source area, and at the same time it should alleviate poverty and become prosperous.
2. Layout of forestry industrial system
1)In developed regions:This region should focus on promote forestry industrial structure and building lots of modern forestry demonstration areas. 2)About relative developed regions:This region should focus on processing industry of forest product and building forest industry cluster with local features. 3)About Midium developed regions:This region should focus on construction of commercial forest bases and building forest industrial belt. 4)About less developed regions:This region should focus on woody food industry and forest biomass energy industry. 5)About Undeveloped regions:This region should focus on ecotourism.
3. Layout of forestry ecological culture system
1)In developed regions:The region should focus on strengthening the research and education of ecological culture system and lay a solid foundation of forestry ecological culture system. 2)About relative developed regions:This region should focus on creative industries development for ecological culture and build brands system of forestry ecological culture. 3)About midium developed regions:This region should focus on raising the level of ecological culture industries and form industrial clusters of ecological culture with regional characteristics. 4)About less developed regions:This region should focus on strengthening the support ability of ecological culture system and build ecological culture system of new rural construction with the help of government. 5)About undeveloped regions:This region should focus on salvation and protection and exploiting scientifically to combine together. And it should form ecological culture system with ethnic flavor under supporting.
4. Financial support to forestry
On the whole,China should work out financial policies which focus on public finance and depend on the mutil-way social investment to support the construction of forestry. The government should increase input of public finance for forestry. Because of regional difference, the government should adopt different forestry policies. Ranking the central government's support, from higher to lower: undeveloped regions, less developed regions, medium developed regions, relative developed regions and developed regions. 1)In developed regions:According to principles of“allowing flexibility”, the central government shoule provide strong support for the first to test forestry reform. The local government should increase forestry construction significantly. 2)About relative developed regions:According to principles of“requiring less”and“allowing flexibility”, the central government shoule provide strong support for over-all forestry development in the urban and rural areas. The local government should increase forestry construction significantly and the structure of local fiscal expenditure shoud be adjusted. 3)About midium developed regions:According to principles of“requiring less”and“giving more”, the central government shoule provide support for forestry. The local government should increase forestry construction. 4)About less developed regions:According to principles of“requiring less”and“giving more”, the central government shoule provide strong support for forestry. The local government should increase forestry construction actively. A perfect system of the forestry support protection shoule be consummated. 5)About undeveloped regions:According to principles of“giving more”, coupled with anti-poverty projects, the central government shoule provide strong support for forestry. The local government should increase forestry construction. the goal of promoting the development of forestry and assisting farmers to shake off poverty will be realized.
Innovations:Firstly, the innovation of forestry economic regionalization. Secondly, the innovation of forestry productivity layout. Thirdly, the innovation of differential regional policy of forestry.
经过建国60年来的改革与发展,我国经济社会发展迅猛,已经基本进入工业化中期阶段。但是受城乡二元体制等多种因素的影响,我国城乡发展差距巨大,林业成为弱质产业,林农成为弱势群体。如何尽快摆脱林业资源危机、林业经济危困以及林农贫穷的局面,如何紧紧围绕社会主义新农村建设的总体目标,加速推进传统林业向现代林业转变,着力构建发达的林业生态体系、林业产业体系和林业生态文化体系,建设繁荣的生态文明,增加农民收入,助推农村早日实现全面小康社会,是一个亟待解决的难题。
我国地域辽阔,有61.2万个行政村,2859个县级单位,各地自然禀赋差别很大,地区发展很不平衡,现代林业的发展也不够协调,全国采用一刀切的林业政策显然不科学。但是目前我国的林业政策大多是全国统一的,地区差异性体现的不够突出,亟待提出差别性的林业政策,以便指导各地的现代林业发展。
本文的理论框架设计思路:首先根据区域差异论研究我国各地区区域经济的差异点,进而初步确定区域差异调控的途径,即重点扶持欠发达区域经济发展,一般支持发达地区经济的继续发展,并积极促进发达区域与欠发达区域增强经济联系,发挥发达区域对欠发达区域的带动作用;然后根据林业经济区划的理论,对全国县级单位进行分类;接着根据区域产业布局理论设计了不同地区的林业生产布局。其中包含三个方面的布局:林业生态体系布局、林业产业体系布局、林业生态文化布局;最后给出每个地区的区域政策。主要是区域的经济政策,其中包括林业的公共财政政策、林业的金融支持政策等,还有区域的科技政策、人才政策等。
本研究按照分类指导的思路,以县域林业为研究对象,以2006年县域农民人均纯收入为主要分类指标,将全国的县级单位划分为五类地区:发达地区、相对发达地区、中等发展地区、相对滞后地区和滞后地区,通过剖析五类地区区域经济的差异性、林业建设取得的经验、今后现代林业建设面临的困难等,从而研究出适合不同地区的林业政策。
本论文研究意义重大:第一,有利于国家根据不同地区现代林业的特点调整宏观政策,将有限的资源科学配置给不同地区,为国家从宏观上制定相应可行的林业政策具有重要的理论依据。第二,有利于不同地区根据本地特点采取可操作性的林业政策,因地制宜发展现代林业,推进新农村建设全面小康社会。
本文研究出了五类地区在林业生态体系、林业产业体系、林业生态文化体系的不同布局,还提出财政、金融、科技、人才等方面相应的保障措施,现列举几个重要结论。
主要结论之一:从林业生态体系的布局看
第一,发达地区。该地区多地处沿海地带,其主要的生态建设任务是:以沿海防护林建设工程为重点,夯实万里海疆的绿色屏障。第二,相对发达地区。该地区主要分布在大中城市郊区,其主要任务是:以城乡一体化林业生态建设为重点,城乡统筹建设和谐林业。第三,中等发展地区。该地区主要集中在我国的粮食主产区,其主要任务是:以保护基本农田的林业工程为重点加强林业生态建设,构筑农业稳产高产的生态安全屏障。第四,相对滞后地区。该地区主要分布在中西部生态脆弱的地区。其主要任务是:以国家林业重点工程为重点,扶持构建完备的林业生态体系。第五,滞后地区。该地区主要分布在中西部老、少、边、库区,尤其以水源区居多。其主要任务是:以重点水源区的林业建设为重点,加大对生态建设的扶持力度。
主要结论之二:从林业产业体系的布局看
第一,发达地区发展林业产业的思路是:以优化提升林业产业结构为重点,努力打造新型林业产业格局。第二,相对发达地区发展林业产业的思路是:以林产品加工业为重点,打造林业特色产业集群,加快高效益林业产业体系建设。第三,中等发展地区发展林业产业的思路是:以商品林基地建设为重点,全面发展林业产业,增加国内林产品后备资源储备。第四,相对滞后地区发展林业产业的思路是:以木本粮油为重点,建设“名、优、新”的特色林业产业体系。第五,滞后地区发展林业产业的思路是:以生态旅游为扶持重点,全面提升林业产业对新农村的贡献率。
主要结论之三:从林业生态文化体系的布局看
第一,发达地区。其思路是:以加强生态文化体系的基础研究为重点,夯实林业生态文化体系的基石。第二,相对发达地区。其思路是:以生态文化创意产业为重点,打造林业生态文化品牌体系。第三,中等发展地区。其思路是:以提升生态文化产业层次为重点,形成具有鲜明地区特色的生态文化产业群。第四,相对滞后地区。其思路是:以加强生态文化体系的保障能力为重点,扶持构建新农村生态文化体系。第五,滞后地区。其思路是:以抢救保护与科学开发相结合为重点,扶持构建具有民族特色的生态文化体系。
主要结论之四:从公共财政政策和政府林业投入的角度看
总体上说,我国要建立以公共财政为主的多元化林业投入长效机制,加大国家公共财政的投入力度,提高政府对林业的投资水平,促进林业的可持续和快速发展。基于地区的不同区情,中央财政和地方财政所起的作用有所不同,应对各个地区实行差别性的公共财政政策,中央财政的扶持力度从高到低依次是:滞后地区、相对滞后地区、中等发展地区、相对发达地区、发达地区。
五类地区具体的公共财政政策与政府林业投入建议:第一,发达地区。中央政府要按照“放活”的原则,对该地区林业改革与发展的先行先试给予投入上的大力支持。地方政府要大幅度加大对林业的投入,逐步建立与本级财政相适应的,与其他行业协调发展的,支持林业现代化早日实现的林业投入体系。第二,相对发达地区:国家要按照“放活”和“少取”的原则,对该地区城乡统筹建设现代林业给予投入上的大力支持。地方政府要大幅度加大对林业的投入,积极调整财政的城乡支出结构,逐步建立支持城乡一体化林业发展的林业投入体系。第三,中等发展地区。国家要按照“少取”和“多予”的原则,逐步增加中央财政的投入。地方政府要在国家适当扶持的基础上,着力增加对林业的投入,努力建立以公共财政为主的多元化投入机制。第四,相对滞后地区。国家应按照“少取”和“多予”的原则,大幅度加大对该地区林业建设的投入力度,地方政府也要积极增加对林业的投入,逐步构建完善的林业支持保护体系。第五,滞后地区。国家应当按照“多予”的原则,结合扶贫工程,大幅度加大对该地区林业建设的投入力度,地方政府也要努力增加对林业的投入,逐步构建助推林业发展和林农脱贫致富的林业投入体系。
本文的创新点:
1)林业经济区划创新。本文没有沿袭传统的自然区划或林业区划,创造性地按照农民收入对全国县级单位分类,这样有利于研究在现代林业建设中的林农增收问题。
2)林业生产布局创新。有别于传统地按照林种来布局林业生产的方式,本文按照林业生态体系、林业产业建设和林业生态文化体系进行布局。
3)林业区域政策创新。创造性地提出不同区域的差异性的林业政策,尤其是指出中央政府对各类地区现代林业建设的不同支持力度和支持重点,有利于国家将有限的资源进行科学配置,为政府制定宏观政策提供理论参考。
Our country is in the crucial stage of building a well-off society in an all-round way. To construct the well-off society, the key and the difficulty is the countryside. So the construction of new socialist countryside is of great significance. The new rural construction involves many aspects, and modern forestry construction is an important part of it. For many years, the forestry has made an important contribution to improve rural ecological environment.
After 60 years’developing, with the rapid development of economy and society in China, from the overall view, China has entered the mid-term stage of industrialization when the industry finances agriculture and the city promotes the countryside. Under the traditional urban-rural dual system for many years, the urban-rural disparity is more and more large. Forestry becomes a weak industry and foresters become the vulnerable group. It is urgent to solve that how to break away from recoverable resources crisis and economic depression, how to turn the traditional forestry to the modern forestry, how to build developed conservation culture, how to increase farmers’income and how to achieve an all-round well-to-do society in the countryside as soon as possible.
China has large territory and has 61.2 ten thousand administrative villages and 2859 counties. The difference of natural endowments is very big and district development is not balanced, so it is obviously not scientific that adopting unified forestry policies. But most forestry policies in China are unified and they should not incarnate the difference of many areas. In order to carry out classification guidance to modern forestry, it is imperative to study different forestry policy for all kinds of regions.
Following the thinking that coordinative development of urban and rural areas and classification guidance, we regard county economy as the object of study and take per capita net income of farmers as the standard. Then all counties in China are divided to five types of regions:developed regions, relative developed regions, medium developed regions, less developed regions and undeveloped regions. By analyzing the difference of many regions, experience and lesson achieved from construction in forestry, we have developed different forestry policie fit for many types of region.
The study is of great importance: Firstly, it is beneficial for the Chinese government to adjust timely macro-economic policy according to the difference of regions and disposal of resource scientifically. Secondly, it is beneficial for local government to adopt operational forestry policies and tailor measures to suit local conditions.
This paper has work out allocation in forestry ecosystem, forestry industrial system and ecological culture system. In addition, we bring forward some feasible measures in finances, science and technology, talented person and so on. Here are some important conclusions.
1. Layout of forestry ecosystem
1)In developed regions:This region is mainly located in the coastal areas, so it should focus on the coastal shelterbelts project. 2)About relative developed regions:This region is mainly located in suburbs of large and medium-sized cities, so it should focus on forestry ecology construction of urban-rural integration. 3)About midium developed regions: This region is mainly located in midlands where major grain producing areas lie in, so it should focus on keywords forestry engineering for protection of basic farmland. 4)About less developed regions: This region is mainly located in ecological friable areas of the West and the midlands, so it should focus on National Key Forestry Programs to build strong forestry ecosystem. 5)About undeveloped regions: This region is mainly located in the old, sparse, frontier, and poor mountain areas, so it should focus on forestry engineering of the key water source area, and at the same time it should alleviate poverty and become prosperous.
2. Layout of forestry industrial system
1)In developed regions:This region should focus on promote forestry industrial structure and building lots of modern forestry demonstration areas. 2)About relative developed regions:This region should focus on processing industry of forest product and building forest industry cluster with local features. 3)About Midium developed regions:This region should focus on construction of commercial forest bases and building forest industrial belt. 4)About less developed regions:This region should focus on woody food industry and forest biomass energy industry. 5)About Undeveloped regions:This region should focus on ecotourism.
3. Layout of forestry ecological culture system
1)In developed regions:The region should focus on strengthening the research and education of ecological culture system and lay a solid foundation of forestry ecological culture system. 2)About relative developed regions:This region should focus on creative industries development for ecological culture and build brands system of forestry ecological culture. 3)About midium developed regions:This region should focus on raising the level of ecological culture industries and form industrial clusters of ecological culture with regional characteristics. 4)About less developed regions:This region should focus on strengthening the support ability of ecological culture system and build ecological culture system of new rural construction with the help of government. 5)About undeveloped regions:This region should focus on salvation and protection and exploiting scientifically to combine together. And it should form ecological culture system with ethnic flavor under supporting.
4. Financial support to forestry
On the whole,China should work out financial policies which focus on public finance and depend on the mutil-way social investment to support the construction of forestry. The government should increase input of public finance for forestry. Because of regional difference, the government should adopt different forestry policies. Ranking the central government's support, from higher to lower: undeveloped regions, less developed regions, medium developed regions, relative developed regions and developed regions. 1)In developed regions:According to principles of“allowing flexibility”, the central government shoule provide strong support for the first to test forestry reform. The local government should increase forestry construction significantly. 2)About relative developed regions:According to principles of“requiring less”and“allowing flexibility”, the central government shoule provide strong support for over-all forestry development in the urban and rural areas. The local government should increase forestry construction significantly and the structure of local fiscal expenditure shoud be adjusted. 3)About midium developed regions:According to principles of“requiring less”and“giving more”, the central government shoule provide support for forestry. The local government should increase forestry construction. 4)About less developed regions:According to principles of“requiring less”and“giving more”, the central government shoule provide strong support for forestry. The local government should increase forestry construction actively. A perfect system of the forestry support protection shoule be consummated. 5)About undeveloped regions:According to principles of“giving more”, coupled with anti-poverty projects, the central government shoule provide strong support for forestry. The local government should increase forestry construction. the goal of promoting the development of forestry and assisting farmers to shake off poverty will be realized.
Innovations:Firstly, the innovation of forestry economic regionalization. Secondly, the innovation of forestry productivity layout. Thirdly, the innovation of differential regional policy of forestry.
引文
艾云航.美国林业管理和资金投入.农业经济,1994,(5):40-43
蔡雪雄,杨建州.论山区乡村社会林业发展与政府政策选择.林业经济问题,2006,26(6):543-548
陈栋生.区域经济学.郑州:河南人民出版社,1993,7-11
陈梦.加快推进林业标准化进程实现林业增长方式转变.新疆林业,2007,(4):4-5
陈绪和.把国际科技合作推向新阶段.林业科技管理,1999年,(4):21-24
程立双.深化集体林权制度改革的实践与思考.林业经济,2009,(5):24-27
崔培毅.加快平原绿化步伐构筑平原林业新格局.新疆林业,2002,(05):20-21
范增伟,张克勇,严东波.河南省贫困地区林业发展项目实施成效分析.河南林业科技,2006,26(4):46-47
费本华,王晓军,李剑泉.面向循环经济的林业装备绿色制造模式.木材加工机械,2008,19(2):28-35
冯彩云.瑞典、日本林业社会化服务体系的比较与借鉴.林业经济,2006,(12):70-72
福建省林业厅.创新思路积极探索不断完善生态公益林管护和补偿机制.林业建设,2008,(01):33-35
傅于川,欧阳德君.民族地区生态文化产业发展初探——以黔东南苗族侗族自治州为例.贵州民族研究,2009,29(125):114-119
高学武,刘丽莉,王吉祥.我国新农村生态文化体系构建研究.环境保护与循环经济,2008,(11):45-48
顾定武.曲靖市麒麟区生态林业建设的成就和展望.林业调查规划,2003,28(4):35-38
国家林业局经济发展研究中心,国家林业局发展计划与资金管理司. 2006年国家林业重点工程社会经济效益监测报告.北京:中国林业出版社,2006
国家林业局推进新农村建设工作领导小组办公室.林业推进新农村建设文件汇编.北京:中国农业出版社,2007,29-34
韩建军,王海珠.创建国家森林城市成都演绎城乡和谐——成都建设森林城市促进城乡统筹发展纪实.中国城市经济,2007,(05):46-51
郝寿义,安虎森.区域经济学.北京:经济科学出版社,1999,27-38
何英,张小全.天保工程中社会保障现状、问题及对策.林业科学,2005,4l(4):94-99
侯元兆,张颖,曹克瑜.森林资源核算:理论方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社,2005,12-13
侯元兆,赵杰.发展现代林业产业带.林业经济,1999,(6):19-25
胡亚芬,周建金,翁逸锋.对构筑杭州城市化建设绿色屏障的探讨.华东森林经理,2003,(01):44-46
贾莉华.提高林业装备技术创新能力推进现代林业建设.林业机械与木工设备,2008 , 36(8):34-36
江曼琦.区域经济运行机制研究.天津:天津科学技术出版社,2000,66-69
江泽慧等.中国现代林业(第二版).北京:中国林业出版社,2008,62-63
姜伟军.浙江林业产业集群的培育与发展研究.林业经济,2007,(5):54-57
焦德泉.利用林业贴息贷款促进非公有制林业经济发展.林业财务与会计,2005,(8):39-40
孔祥智,何安华,史冰清等.关于集体林权制度改革和林业合作经济组织建设.林业经济,2009,(5):17-23
雷静品,江泽平,袁士云.甘肃小陇山次生林多目标经营研究.西北林学院学报,2008,23(6):182-186
李冰.加快平原林业发展推进社会主义新农村建设.国土绿化,2006,(07):26
李皓.论生态移民与民族地区现代化.黑龙江民族丛刊,2005,(01):32-35
李红军,王建江,牛建瑞.山区庄园式开发模式研究——以河北省元氏县为例.中国农学通报,2003,19(6):132-134
李怀省,赵元清.对陇南林业人才资源现状及问题的探讨.甘肃科技,2006,22(2):35-36
李建明.福建省森林保险的实践与探索.绿色财会,2008,(7):48-50
李文彬.知识经济时代与我国林业高级专门人才的培养.中国林业教育,2000,(03):30-32
李玉敏,侯元兆.世界林业研究. 2005,18(6):17-24
廖少华,李飞跃.林业扶贫二十年日新月异黔东南.中国林业,2007,(23):1
林海燕.芬兰林业对我国的启示.林业经济,2008,(2):76-80
刘畅.积极开展森林保险促进林业发展.绿色财会,2005,(11):29-30
刘世荣,史作民,马姜明等.长江上游退化天然林恢复重建的生态对策.林业科学,2009,45(2):120-124
刘维忠,陈玉兰,韦振江.内陆干旱地区林业生态工程扶贫开发模式的探索.生态经济,2008,(12):85-87
刘晓光,刘国成,施捷.论林业与公共财政的关系及其基本框架的构建.林业经济,2005,30(6):65-67
龙建平,刘力纲.基层普及林权抵押贷款尚存“五难”.中国金融,2007,(21):82
陆成林,闫伟,王振宇等.关于完善我国生态补偿体系的思考.地方财政研究,2008,(02):22-25
罗雪妹.尤溪县林业专业协会现状与发展对策.林业勘察设计,2006,(02):218-212
潘焕学秦涛.基于资本形成机制的林业金融体系构建路径.林业经济,2009,(11):62-66
彭继平.关于京津风沙源治理工程建设的思考.林业经济,2007,(10):34-36
彭镇华等.浙江林业现代化发展战略研究与规划.北京:中国农业出版社,2006,408-417
秦涛,田治威,姚星期.金融视角下林业投融资体系研究思路及框架设计.绿色财会,2008,(11):18-20
曲桂林.我国林业多边国际合作的现状及发展趋势.林业工作研究,2006年,(6):10-15
山东省林业局.充分发挥贴息贷款的引导作用积极扶持林业龙头企业发展,绿色财会,2006,(6):40
苏宗海.国外林业财政政策分析.绿色中国,2004,(06):45-48
覃成林.中国区域经济差异研究.北京:中国经济出版社,1997,23-28
汤勇.浙江林业现代化的投入保障研究.浙江林学院学报,2007,24(3) :260-265
万秋山.可持续发展的奥地利林业及其对我国的启示.中国环境管理干部学院学报,2005,15(3):5-8
汪绚.林业法治及林业政策走向.中国林业产业,2005,(01):14-16
王秉勇,李卫东,崔银珠.韩国林业及中韩林业之比较.世界林业研究,1999,12(5):54-60
王春云.林业贴息贷款大透视.中国林业产业,2008,(03):41-46
王登举.日本的私有林经济扶持政策及其借鉴.世界林业研究,2004,17(5):42-48
王建华.平原地区林业发展建设对策探讨.华东森林经理,2002,16(04):12-14
王琦,赵奇,刘淑清.对我国林业装备技术发展中存在问题的思考.林业机械与木工设备,2005,33(7):10-11
王前进.促进林业投资的政策框架构想.绿色中国,2004,(10):19-21
王玉琳.社会主义新农村建设中林业人才问题及对策.四川林业科技,2007,28(2):69-72
王志山,王立海,戚大伟.关于发展伊春林区绿色经济的战略思考.森林工程,2006,22(4):58-62
韦惠兰,陈海云,任晓冬.中国林权改革的回顾和思考.开发研究,2007,(4):19-22
魏殿生.我国林业发展的主要政策.今日国土,2005,(09):40-41
吴殿廷.区域经济学.北京:科学出版社,2003,242-293
吴伟光.澳大利亚林业概况及其启示.世界林业研究,2002,15(4):63-68
吴志文.广元林业20年的成就与措施创新.林业经济问题,2005,25(6):359-363
夏春胜.绿色江苏建设的战略方案与保障体系.南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(5):9-12
肖平,张敏新.美国林业税制及借鉴.世界林业研究,1999,12(3):55-60
许传德.试论浙、闽、粤现代林业建设的先导性.林业经济,2007,(03):25-28
严明.江山市城乡一体化绿化工程建设的探讨.华东森林经理,2004,l8(4):49-51
杨朝兴.南水北调中线工程林业建设与生态保护问题——以河南省丹江口水源区为例.绿色中国,2004,(14):43-45
杨传平,王丽娜,刘关君.林木良种补贴政策的若干问题.种子,2006,25(12):84-86
杨继平.把发展木本粮油作为方针性问题摆上日程.绿色中国,2005,(18):4-6
杨立新.用创新精神推动生态文化发展.天津日报,2007-12-17(09)
姚昌恬.走开发与治理相结合的新路——新形势下抓好全国山区综合开发示范工作的思考.中国林业,2000,(5):6-8
俞小平,聂影.福建省中低收入林农小额长期贷款问题探讨.林业经济,2007,(11):56-59
袁平.恩施州生态旅游发展现状及对策.清江论坛,2008,(03):52-55
袁琦,张贵.湖南林业产业结构调整必须建立五大支撑体系.科技资讯,2007,(09):160-161
曾起郁,陈秋华.林业科技创新人才培养机制探讨.林业经济问题,2004,24(4):243-246
张敦富,覃成林.中国区域经济差异与协调发展.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2001,37-42
张敦富.区域经济学原理.北京:中国轻工业出版社,1999
张洪明,蒋大勇.新农村建设形势下的退耕还林工程建设思路与对策.四川林勘设计,2007,(01):1-4
张慧平,郑小贤.现代林业与林业生态文化探讨.林业经济. 2007,(03):22-24
张可云.区域大战与区域经济关系.北京:民主与建设出版社,2001,17-22
张利国.江西省集体林权制度改革探析.林业科学,2008,44(7):79-83
张泱.加快产业结构调整拉动区域经济发展.中国林业企业,2003,(02):6-8
张煜星,胡培兴,何时珍.美国的林业政策和制度.世界林业研究,2005,18(1):65-67
张振国.我国生态环境建设与林业财政政策导向.经济研究参考,2005年(90):1-14
张中旺.南水北调中线工程水源地的生态安全与对策研究.生态经济,2008,(2):307-311
张忠法,金旻,陈兴良.建立中国特色的支持与保护林业和生态建设的要素配置体系.经济研究参考,2004,(57):30-36
赵江红.中国林业生物质能源开发利用的调查思考.林业经济,2009,(03):13-16
赵奇,赵小茜,徐克生.国内外林业装备主要技术水平和发展趋势.林业机械与木工设备,2005,33(02):10-12
赵体顺,田金萍,阎志平等. 21世纪河南林业生态环境建设战略研究.河南农业大学学报,2001,35(3):225-230
赵鸭桥,苏宇芳.对西南地区集体林权制度改革的思考.经济体制改革,2008,(04):96-102
中国高级林业经济体制培训考察团.德国的林业管理体制、林业立法及林业政策.世界林业经济,1995(3):41-46
周其祥.构建林业融资平台的思考.绿色财会,2007,(9):7-8
周生贤.全面加强沿海防护林体系建设加快构筑我国万里海疆的绿色屏障.绿色中国,2005,(6):4-7
朱国良,郭建国.关于“三个塞罕坝林场”可持续发展的探讨.林业经济,2009(5):61-64
朱云杰.大力培育林农专业合作组织促进林业生产力发展.浙江林业,2008,(B11):32-33
Adrien C. Finzi, Charles D. Canham. Sapling growth in response to light and nitrogen availability in a southern New England forest. Forest Ecology and Management,2000,131(1-3):153-165
Alan A. Lucier, James P. Shepard. Certification and regulation of forestry practices in the United States: Implications for intensively managed plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy,1997,13(4-5):193-199
Andrew Church,Neil Ravenscroft. Landowner responses to financial incentive schemes for recreational access to woodlands in South East England. Land Use Policy,2008,25(1):1-16
Benjamin Cashore, Graeme Auld, James Lawson, Deanna Newsom. The Future of Non-State Authority on Canadian Staples Industries: Assessing the Emergence of Forest Certification. Policy and Society,2007,26(1):71-91
Bernhard M?hring, Ursula Rüping. A concept for the calculation of financial losses when changing the forest management strategy. Forest Policy and Economics,2008,10(3):98-107
Bernhard M?hring. The German struggle between the‘Bodenreinertragslehre’(land rent theory) and ‘Waldreinertragslehre’(theory of the highest revenue) belongs to the past—but what is left? Forest Policy and Economics,2001,2(2):195-201
David M. Nanang, Grant K. Hauer. Estimating the costs of overlapping tenure constraints: a case study in Northern Alberta, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,8(6):610-624
Dong-Jun Kim, Gerard F. Schreuder,Yeo-Chang Youn. Impacts of the currency value change on the forest products import quantities in Korea. Forest Policy and Economics,2003,5(3):317-324
Eben Goodale, Punit Lalbhai, Uromi M. Goodale, et al. The relationship between shelterwood cuts and crown thinnings and the abundance and distribution of birds in a southern New England forest. Forest Ecology and Management,2009,258(3):314-322
Edward P. Farrell,Erwin Führer,Dermot Ryan,et al. European forest ecosystems: building the future on the legacy of the past. Forest Ecology and Management,2000,132(1):5-20
Frederick W. Cubbage, David H. Newman. Forest policy reformed: A United States perspective. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,9(3):261-273
G. Frank, F. Müller. Voluntary approaches in protection of forests in Austria. Environmental Science &Policy,2003,6(3):261-269
Gary Musselwhite, Gamini Herath. Australia's regional forest agreement process: analysis of the potential and problems. Forest Policy and Economics,2005,7(4):579-588
Gerhard Weiss. Evaluation of policy instruments for protective forest management in Austria. Forest Policy and Economics,2000,1(3-4):243-255
Harri Siiskonen. The conflict between traditional and scientific forest management in 20th century Finland. Forest Ecology and Management,2007,249(1-2):125-133
J. Pyk?l?. Implementation of Forest Act habitats in Finland: Does it protect the right habitats for threatened species? Forest Ecology and Management, 2007,242(2-3):281-287
Jacek P. Siry, Frederick W. Cubbage, Miyan Rukunuddin Ahmed. Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities. Forest Policy and Economics,2005,7(4):551-561
Jan Holecy, Marc Hanewinkel. A forest management risk insurance model and its application to coniferous stands in southwest Germany. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,8(2):161-174
Jari Parviainen, Georg Frank. Protected forests in Europe approaches-harmonising the definitions for international comparison and forest policy making. Journal of Environmental Management,2003,67(1):27-36
Jason K. Levy, Keith W. Hipel, D. Marc Kilgour. Using environmental indicators to quantify the robustness of policy alternatives to uncertainty. Ecological Modelling,2000,130(1-3):79-86
Jay Sullivan, Gregory S. Amacher, Sara Chapman. Forest banking and forest landowners forgoing management rights for guaranteed financial returns. Forest Policy and Economics,2005,7(3): 381-392
Jeremy Rayner, Michael Howlett, Jeremy Wilson, et al. Privileging the sub-sector: critical sub-sectors and sectoral relationships in forest policy-making. Forest Policy and Economics,2001,2(3-4):319-332
Jessica J. Janota, Shorna R. Broussard. Examining private forest policy preferences. Forest Policy and Economics,2008,10(3): 89-97
Johannes Voitleithner. The National Forest Programme in the light of Austria's law and political culture. Forest Policy and Economics,2002,4(4):313-322
Joon Hwan Shin, Don Koo Lee. Strategies for restoration of forest ecosystems degraded by forest fire in Kangwon Ecoregion of Korea. Forest Ecology and Management,2004,201(1):43-56
Judy Clark. Forest policy for sustainable commodity wood production: an examination drawing on the Australian experience. Ecological Economics,2004,50(3-4):219-232
K. J. Kirby. Woodland conservation in privately-owned cultural landscapes: the English experience. Environmental Science & Policy,2003,6(3):253-259
Kenli A. Schaaf, Shorna R. Broussard. Private forest policy tools: A national survey exploring the American public's perceptions and support. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,9(4):316-334
Lisa J. Carlson, Patrick Impero Wilson. Beyond zero-sum: game theory and national forest management. The Social Science Journal,2004,41(4):637-650
Mag. Eva Kvarda.‘Non-agricultural forest owners’in Austria–a new type of forest ownership. Forest Policy and Economics,2004,6(5):459-467
Mathieu Bouchard, Daniel Kneeshaw, Yves Bergeron. Ecosystem management based on large-scale disturbance pulses: A case study from sub-boreal forests of western Quebec (Canada). Forest Ecology and Management,2008,256(10):1734-1742
Michael A. Kilgore, Charles R. Blinn. Policy tools to encourage the application of sustainable timber and bamboo harvesting practices in the United States and Canada. Forest Policy and Economics, 2004,6(2):111-127
P.W. Woodgate, B.D. Peel, J.E. Coram, et al. Old-growth forest studies in Victoria, Australia Concepts and principles. Forest Ecology and Management,1996,85(1-3):79-94
P?ivi M. Tikka. Conservation contracts in habitat protection in southern Finland. Environmental Science & Policy,2003,6(3):271-278
Paul Cloke, Paul Milbourne, Chris Thomas. From wasteland to wonderland: Opencast mining, regeneration and the English National Forest. Pergamon Geoforum,1996,27(2):159-174
Peter Elsasser. Do“stakeholders”represent citizen interests? An empirical inquiry into assessments of policy aims in the National Forest Programme for Germany. Forest Policy and Economics,2007,9(8):1018-1030
S A PoynT, W J Hurditch. Cooperation and conflict in forest management:Applying a theoretical model to the Australian problem. Australia Forestry,1990,58(2):58～64
Shashi Kant. Sustainable management of uneven-aged private forests: a case study from Ontario, Canada. Ecological Economics,1999,30(1):131-146
Signe Anthon, Jens Friis Lund, Finn Helles. Targeting the poor: Taxation of marketed forest products in developing countries. Journal of Forest Economics,2008,14(3):197-224
Tenley M. Conway, Lisa Urbani. Variations in municipal urban forestry policy: A case study of Toronto, Canada. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2007,6(3):181-192
Thomas Knoke, Martin Moog. Timber and bamboo harvesting versus forest reserves—producer prices for open-use areas in German beech forests (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ecological Economics,2005,52(1):97-110
Thomas Scheeder, Martin Moog, Herbert Borchert. Bureaucratic financial burdens on privately owned forest companies: Results of a case study in three German federal states. Forest Policy and Economics,2002,4(1):21-31
Vegard Gundersen, Lars Helge Frivold, Irja L?fstr?m, et al. Urban woodland management–The case of 13 major Nordic cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2005,3(3-4):189-202
Yeo-Chang Youn. Use of forest resources, traditional forest-related knowledge and livelihood of forest dependent communities: Cases in South Korea. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009,257(10):2027-2034
Young Woo Chun, Kwang-Il Tak. Songgye, a traditional knowledge system for sustainable forest management in Choson Dynasty of Korea. Forest Ecology and Management,2009,257(10):2022-2026
蔡雪雄,杨建州.论山区乡村社会林业发展与政府政策选择.林业经济问题,2006,26(6):543-548
陈栋生.区域经济学.郑州:河南人民出版社,1993,7-11
陈梦.加快推进林业标准化进程实现林业增长方式转变.新疆林业,2007,(4):4-5
陈绪和.把国际科技合作推向新阶段.林业科技管理,1999年,(4):21-24
程立双.深化集体林权制度改革的实践与思考.林业经济,2009,(5):24-27
崔培毅.加快平原绿化步伐构筑平原林业新格局.新疆林业,2002,(05):20-21
范增伟,张克勇,严东波.河南省贫困地区林业发展项目实施成效分析.河南林业科技,2006,26(4):46-47
费本华,王晓军,李剑泉.面向循环经济的林业装备绿色制造模式.木材加工机械,2008,19(2):28-35
冯彩云.瑞典、日本林业社会化服务体系的比较与借鉴.林业经济,2006,(12):70-72
福建省林业厅.创新思路积极探索不断完善生态公益林管护和补偿机制.林业建设,2008,(01):33-35
傅于川,欧阳德君.民族地区生态文化产业发展初探——以黔东南苗族侗族自治州为例.贵州民族研究,2009,29(125):114-119
高学武,刘丽莉,王吉祥.我国新农村生态文化体系构建研究.环境保护与循环经济,2008,(11):45-48
顾定武.曲靖市麒麟区生态林业建设的成就和展望.林业调查规划,2003,28(4):35-38
国家林业局经济发展研究中心,国家林业局发展计划与资金管理司. 2006年国家林业重点工程社会经济效益监测报告.北京:中国林业出版社,2006
国家林业局推进新农村建设工作领导小组办公室.林业推进新农村建设文件汇编.北京:中国农业出版社,2007,29-34
韩建军,王海珠.创建国家森林城市成都演绎城乡和谐——成都建设森林城市促进城乡统筹发展纪实.中国城市经济,2007,(05):46-51
郝寿义,安虎森.区域经济学.北京:经济科学出版社,1999,27-38
何英,张小全.天保工程中社会保障现状、问题及对策.林业科学,2005,4l(4):94-99
侯元兆,张颖,曹克瑜.森林资源核算:理论方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社,2005,12-13
侯元兆,赵杰.发展现代林业产业带.林业经济,1999,(6):19-25
胡亚芬,周建金,翁逸锋.对构筑杭州城市化建设绿色屏障的探讨.华东森林经理,2003,(01):44-46
贾莉华.提高林业装备技术创新能力推进现代林业建设.林业机械与木工设备,2008 , 36(8):34-36
江曼琦.区域经济运行机制研究.天津:天津科学技术出版社,2000,66-69
江泽慧等.中国现代林业(第二版).北京:中国林业出版社,2008,62-63
姜伟军.浙江林业产业集群的培育与发展研究.林业经济,2007,(5):54-57
焦德泉.利用林业贴息贷款促进非公有制林业经济发展.林业财务与会计,2005,(8):39-40
孔祥智,何安华,史冰清等.关于集体林权制度改革和林业合作经济组织建设.林业经济,2009,(5):17-23
雷静品,江泽平,袁士云.甘肃小陇山次生林多目标经营研究.西北林学院学报,2008,23(6):182-186
李冰.加快平原林业发展推进社会主义新农村建设.国土绿化,2006,(07):26
李皓.论生态移民与民族地区现代化.黑龙江民族丛刊,2005,(01):32-35
李红军,王建江,牛建瑞.山区庄园式开发模式研究——以河北省元氏县为例.中国农学通报,2003,19(6):132-134
李怀省,赵元清.对陇南林业人才资源现状及问题的探讨.甘肃科技,2006,22(2):35-36
李建明.福建省森林保险的实践与探索.绿色财会,2008,(7):48-50
李文彬.知识经济时代与我国林业高级专门人才的培养.中国林业教育,2000,(03):30-32
李玉敏,侯元兆.世界林业研究. 2005,18(6):17-24
廖少华,李飞跃.林业扶贫二十年日新月异黔东南.中国林业,2007,(23):1
林海燕.芬兰林业对我国的启示.林业经济,2008,(2):76-80
刘畅.积极开展森林保险促进林业发展.绿色财会,2005,(11):29-30
刘世荣,史作民,马姜明等.长江上游退化天然林恢复重建的生态对策.林业科学,2009,45(2):120-124
刘维忠,陈玉兰,韦振江.内陆干旱地区林业生态工程扶贫开发模式的探索.生态经济,2008,(12):85-87
刘晓光,刘国成,施捷.论林业与公共财政的关系及其基本框架的构建.林业经济,2005,30(6):65-67
龙建平,刘力纲.基层普及林权抵押贷款尚存“五难”.中国金融,2007,(21):82
陆成林,闫伟,王振宇等.关于完善我国生态补偿体系的思考.地方财政研究,2008,(02):22-25
罗雪妹.尤溪县林业专业协会现状与发展对策.林业勘察设计,2006,(02):218-212
潘焕学秦涛.基于资本形成机制的林业金融体系构建路径.林业经济,2009,(11):62-66
彭继平.关于京津风沙源治理工程建设的思考.林业经济,2007,(10):34-36
彭镇华等.浙江林业现代化发展战略研究与规划.北京:中国农业出版社,2006,408-417
秦涛,田治威,姚星期.金融视角下林业投融资体系研究思路及框架设计.绿色财会,2008,(11):18-20
曲桂林.我国林业多边国际合作的现状及发展趋势.林业工作研究,2006年,(6):10-15
山东省林业局.充分发挥贴息贷款的引导作用积极扶持林业龙头企业发展,绿色财会,2006,(6):40
苏宗海.国外林业财政政策分析.绿色中国,2004,(06):45-48
覃成林.中国区域经济差异研究.北京:中国经济出版社,1997,23-28
汤勇.浙江林业现代化的投入保障研究.浙江林学院学报,2007,24(3) :260-265
万秋山.可持续发展的奥地利林业及其对我国的启示.中国环境管理干部学院学报,2005,15(3):5-8
汪绚.林业法治及林业政策走向.中国林业产业,2005,(01):14-16
王秉勇,李卫东,崔银珠.韩国林业及中韩林业之比较.世界林业研究,1999,12(5):54-60
王春云.林业贴息贷款大透视.中国林业产业,2008,(03):41-46
王登举.日本的私有林经济扶持政策及其借鉴.世界林业研究,2004,17(5):42-48
王建华.平原地区林业发展建设对策探讨.华东森林经理,2002,16(04):12-14
王琦,赵奇,刘淑清.对我国林业装备技术发展中存在问题的思考.林业机械与木工设备,2005,33(7):10-11
王前进.促进林业投资的政策框架构想.绿色中国,2004,(10):19-21
王玉琳.社会主义新农村建设中林业人才问题及对策.四川林业科技,2007,28(2):69-72
王志山,王立海,戚大伟.关于发展伊春林区绿色经济的战略思考.森林工程,2006,22(4):58-62
韦惠兰,陈海云,任晓冬.中国林权改革的回顾和思考.开发研究,2007,(4):19-22
魏殿生.我国林业发展的主要政策.今日国土,2005,(09):40-41
吴殿廷.区域经济学.北京:科学出版社,2003,242-293
吴伟光.澳大利亚林业概况及其启示.世界林业研究,2002,15(4):63-68
吴志文.广元林业20年的成就与措施创新.林业经济问题,2005,25(6):359-363
夏春胜.绿色江苏建设的战略方案与保障体系.南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(5):9-12
肖平,张敏新.美国林业税制及借鉴.世界林业研究,1999,12(3):55-60
许传德.试论浙、闽、粤现代林业建设的先导性.林业经济,2007,(03):25-28
严明.江山市城乡一体化绿化工程建设的探讨.华东森林经理,2004,l8(4):49-51
杨朝兴.南水北调中线工程林业建设与生态保护问题——以河南省丹江口水源区为例.绿色中国,2004,(14):43-45
杨传平,王丽娜,刘关君.林木良种补贴政策的若干问题.种子,2006,25(12):84-86
杨继平.把发展木本粮油作为方针性问题摆上日程.绿色中国,2005,(18):4-6
杨立新.用创新精神推动生态文化发展.天津日报,2007-12-17(09)
姚昌恬.走开发与治理相结合的新路——新形势下抓好全国山区综合开发示范工作的思考.中国林业,2000,(5):6-8
俞小平,聂影.福建省中低收入林农小额长期贷款问题探讨.林业经济,2007,(11):56-59
袁平.恩施州生态旅游发展现状及对策.清江论坛,2008,(03):52-55
袁琦,张贵.湖南林业产业结构调整必须建立五大支撑体系.科技资讯,2007,(09):160-161
曾起郁,陈秋华.林业科技创新人才培养机制探讨.林业经济问题,2004,24(4):243-246
张敦富,覃成林.中国区域经济差异与协调发展.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2001,37-42
张敦富.区域经济学原理.北京:中国轻工业出版社,1999
张洪明,蒋大勇.新农村建设形势下的退耕还林工程建设思路与对策.四川林勘设计,2007,(01):1-4
张慧平,郑小贤.现代林业与林业生态文化探讨.林业经济. 2007,(03):22-24
张可云.区域大战与区域经济关系.北京:民主与建设出版社,2001,17-22
张利国.江西省集体林权制度改革探析.林业科学,2008,44(7):79-83
张泱.加快产业结构调整拉动区域经济发展.中国林业企业,2003,(02):6-8
张煜星,胡培兴,何时珍.美国的林业政策和制度.世界林业研究,2005,18(1):65-67
张振国.我国生态环境建设与林业财政政策导向.经济研究参考,2005年(90):1-14
张中旺.南水北调中线工程水源地的生态安全与对策研究.生态经济,2008,(2):307-311
张忠法,金旻,陈兴良.建立中国特色的支持与保护林业和生态建设的要素配置体系.经济研究参考,2004,(57):30-36
赵江红.中国林业生物质能源开发利用的调查思考.林业经济,2009,(03):13-16
赵奇,赵小茜,徐克生.国内外林业装备主要技术水平和发展趋势.林业机械与木工设备,2005,33(02):10-12
赵体顺,田金萍,阎志平等. 21世纪河南林业生态环境建设战略研究.河南农业大学学报,2001,35(3):225-230
赵鸭桥,苏宇芳.对西南地区集体林权制度改革的思考.经济体制改革,2008,(04):96-102
中国高级林业经济体制培训考察团.德国的林业管理体制、林业立法及林业政策.世界林业经济,1995(3):41-46
周其祥.构建林业融资平台的思考.绿色财会,2007,(9):7-8
周生贤.全面加强沿海防护林体系建设加快构筑我国万里海疆的绿色屏障.绿色中国,2005,(6):4-7
朱国良,郭建国.关于“三个塞罕坝林场”可持续发展的探讨.林业经济,2009(5):61-64
朱云杰.大力培育林农专业合作组织促进林业生产力发展.浙江林业,2008,(B11):32-33
Adrien C. Finzi, Charles D. Canham. Sapling growth in response to light and nitrogen availability in a southern New England forest. Forest Ecology and Management,2000,131(1-3):153-165
Alan A. Lucier, James P. Shepard. Certification and regulation of forestry practices in the United States: Implications for intensively managed plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy,1997,13(4-5):193-199
Andrew Church,Neil Ravenscroft. Landowner responses to financial incentive schemes for recreational access to woodlands in South East England. Land Use Policy,2008,25(1):1-16
Benjamin Cashore, Graeme Auld, James Lawson, Deanna Newsom. The Future of Non-State Authority on Canadian Staples Industries: Assessing the Emergence of Forest Certification. Policy and Society,2007,26(1):71-91
Bernhard M?hring, Ursula Rüping. A concept for the calculation of financial losses when changing the forest management strategy. Forest Policy and Economics,2008,10(3):98-107
Bernhard M?hring. The German struggle between the‘Bodenreinertragslehre’(land rent theory) and ‘Waldreinertragslehre’(theory of the highest revenue) belongs to the past—but what is left? Forest Policy and Economics,2001,2(2):195-201
David M. Nanang, Grant K. Hauer. Estimating the costs of overlapping tenure constraints: a case study in Northern Alberta, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,8(6):610-624
Dong-Jun Kim, Gerard F. Schreuder,Yeo-Chang Youn. Impacts of the currency value change on the forest products import quantities in Korea. Forest Policy and Economics,2003,5(3):317-324
Eben Goodale, Punit Lalbhai, Uromi M. Goodale, et al. The relationship between shelterwood cuts and crown thinnings and the abundance and distribution of birds in a southern New England forest. Forest Ecology and Management,2009,258(3):314-322
Edward P. Farrell,Erwin Führer,Dermot Ryan,et al. European forest ecosystems: building the future on the legacy of the past. Forest Ecology and Management,2000,132(1):5-20
Frederick W. Cubbage, David H. Newman. Forest policy reformed: A United States perspective. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,9(3):261-273
G. Frank, F. Müller. Voluntary approaches in protection of forests in Austria. Environmental Science &Policy,2003,6(3):261-269
Gary Musselwhite, Gamini Herath. Australia's regional forest agreement process: analysis of the potential and problems. Forest Policy and Economics,2005,7(4):579-588
Gerhard Weiss. Evaluation of policy instruments for protective forest management in Austria. Forest Policy and Economics,2000,1(3-4):243-255
Harri Siiskonen. The conflict between traditional and scientific forest management in 20th century Finland. Forest Ecology and Management,2007,249(1-2):125-133
J. Pyk?l?. Implementation of Forest Act habitats in Finland: Does it protect the right habitats for threatened species? Forest Ecology and Management, 2007,242(2-3):281-287
Jacek P. Siry, Frederick W. Cubbage, Miyan Rukunuddin Ahmed. Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities. Forest Policy and Economics,2005,7(4):551-561
Jan Holecy, Marc Hanewinkel. A forest management risk insurance model and its application to coniferous stands in southwest Germany. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,8(2):161-174
Jari Parviainen, Georg Frank. Protected forests in Europe approaches-harmonising the definitions for international comparison and forest policy making. Journal of Environmental Management,2003,67(1):27-36
Jason K. Levy, Keith W. Hipel, D. Marc Kilgour. Using environmental indicators to quantify the robustness of policy alternatives to uncertainty. Ecological Modelling,2000,130(1-3):79-86
Jay Sullivan, Gregory S. Amacher, Sara Chapman. Forest banking and forest landowners forgoing management rights for guaranteed financial returns. Forest Policy and Economics,2005,7(3): 381-392
Jeremy Rayner, Michael Howlett, Jeremy Wilson, et al. Privileging the sub-sector: critical sub-sectors and sectoral relationships in forest policy-making. Forest Policy and Economics,2001,2(3-4):319-332
Jessica J. Janota, Shorna R. Broussard. Examining private forest policy preferences. Forest Policy and Economics,2008,10(3): 89-97
Johannes Voitleithner. The National Forest Programme in the light of Austria's law and political culture. Forest Policy and Economics,2002,4(4):313-322
Joon Hwan Shin, Don Koo Lee. Strategies for restoration of forest ecosystems degraded by forest fire in Kangwon Ecoregion of Korea. Forest Ecology and Management,2004,201(1):43-56
Judy Clark. Forest policy for sustainable commodity wood production: an examination drawing on the Australian experience. Ecological Economics,2004,50(3-4):219-232
K. J. Kirby. Woodland conservation in privately-owned cultural landscapes: the English experience. Environmental Science & Policy,2003,6(3):253-259
Kenli A. Schaaf, Shorna R. Broussard. Private forest policy tools: A national survey exploring the American public's perceptions and support. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,9(4):316-334
Lisa J. Carlson, Patrick Impero Wilson. Beyond zero-sum: game theory and national forest management. The Social Science Journal,2004,41(4):637-650
Mag. Eva Kvarda.‘Non-agricultural forest owners’in Austria–a new type of forest ownership. Forest Policy and Economics,2004,6(5):459-467
Mathieu Bouchard, Daniel Kneeshaw, Yves Bergeron. Ecosystem management based on large-scale disturbance pulses: A case study from sub-boreal forests of western Quebec (Canada). Forest Ecology and Management,2008,256(10):1734-1742
Michael A. Kilgore, Charles R. Blinn. Policy tools to encourage the application of sustainable timber and bamboo harvesting practices in the United States and Canada. Forest Policy and Economics, 2004,6(2):111-127
P.W. Woodgate, B.D. Peel, J.E. Coram, et al. Old-growth forest studies in Victoria, Australia Concepts and principles. Forest Ecology and Management,1996,85(1-3):79-94
P?ivi M. Tikka. Conservation contracts in habitat protection in southern Finland. Environmental Science & Policy,2003,6(3):271-278
Paul Cloke, Paul Milbourne, Chris Thomas. From wasteland to wonderland: Opencast mining, regeneration and the English National Forest. Pergamon Geoforum,1996,27(2):159-174
Peter Elsasser. Do“stakeholders”represent citizen interests? An empirical inquiry into assessments of policy aims in the National Forest Programme for Germany. Forest Policy and Economics,2007,9(8):1018-1030
S A PoynT, W J Hurditch. Cooperation and conflict in forest management:Applying a theoretical model to the Australian problem. Australia Forestry,1990,58(2):58～64
Shashi Kant. Sustainable management of uneven-aged private forests: a case study from Ontario, Canada. Ecological Economics,1999,30(1):131-146
Signe Anthon, Jens Friis Lund, Finn Helles. Targeting the poor: Taxation of marketed forest products in developing countries. Journal of Forest Economics,2008,14(3):197-224
Tenley M. Conway, Lisa Urbani. Variations in municipal urban forestry policy: A case study of Toronto, Canada. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2007,6(3):181-192
Thomas Knoke, Martin Moog. Timber and bamboo harvesting versus forest reserves—producer prices for open-use areas in German beech forests (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ecological Economics,2005,52(1):97-110
Thomas Scheeder, Martin Moog, Herbert Borchert. Bureaucratic financial burdens on privately owned forest companies: Results of a case study in three German federal states. Forest Policy and Economics,2002,4(1):21-31
Vegard Gundersen, Lars Helge Frivold, Irja L?fstr?m, et al. Urban woodland management–The case of 13 major Nordic cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2005,3(3-4):189-202
Yeo-Chang Youn. Use of forest resources, traditional forest-related knowledge and livelihood of forest dependent communities: Cases in South Korea. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009,257(10):2027-2034
Young Woo Chun, Kwang-Il Tak. Songgye, a traditional knowledge system for sustainable forest management in Choson Dynasty of Korea. Forest Ecology and Management,2009,257(10):2022-2026