中国货币政策区域非对称效应研究
|
摘要
货币政策区域非对称性是从货币政策非对称性内涵中分离出来的。对货币政策区域效应研究最早的学者是Scott（1955），而Cover（1992）在其发表的论文《正向和负向的货币冲击的非对称性效应》中正式提出的货币政策非对称效应的概念，之后为理论界所普遍接受。随着货币政策理论研究的深入，货币政策非对称效应的内涵和表现形式逐渐丰富。货币政策区域非对称效应主要表现在时间和空间维度的不一致，具体细分为三方面：其一，货币政策的非对称效应（asymmetriceffect）：经济衰退阶段的扩张性货币政策对经济的刺激作用小于经济过热阶段紧缩性货币政策对经济的减速作用；其二，货币政策效应的时间非一致性（timeinconsistency）：在政府与公众的动态博弈过程中，由于公众行为导致政策环境改变，政府最初制定出的最优政策，在执行阶段可能会失去最优性，为了避免损失，政府不会真正执行原来的政策，而是采取相机抉择的策略，重新选择最优的政策；其三，货币政策的区域效应（regionaleffects），或称空间非一致性，与时间非一致性相对应，主要是指同一货币政策作用于不同经济区域会产生的不同政策效果。在上述三个方面的研究中，前两个方面的问题在国内外研究的时间相对较长，而第三个方面的研究在国外大约从20世纪70年代以后才正式开始，这一方面的研究近年来已有一些成果，但也仅处于起步阶段。本文的评述主要针对第三方面即货币政策区域非对称效应来展开的。
我国经济发展的区域特性随改革开放和市场化的进程越发突出，由此引发对货币政策区域非对称效应问题更加关注。区域特性可以从产业结构、企业结构、以及金融体系等地区差异因素体现出来，根据这些经济结构因素的差异，再综合区域地理位置的分布特征，本文认为我国区域经济体系更适合划分为东部、中部、西部、东北部四个地区。本文的研究主题是从地区总需求和总供给角度探讨产生我国货币政策区域非对称效应问题。根据本文的研究主题，我们首先要搞清楚什么是货币政策区域非对称效应问题？其次，在此基础上还要搞清楚为什么会存在区域非对称效应问题，即产生该效应的主要影响因素有哪些？
对这些问题的研究，本文主要从宏观层面逐渐渗透到微观层面对其进行了全面分析。其中第四、五章是本文的核心部分，论文结论也主要来自这两章。第四章的结论主要通过两方面分析得到的。一方面基于地区需求因素，分别从消费效应和投资效应的角度对我国货币政策区域非对称效应的现实基础进行了分析；另一方面基于短期总供给曲线理论，从造成地区总供给曲线差异的角度，对我国货币政策区域非对称效应进行展开分析。通过上述两方面的分析，本文所得出的结论有：
（1）在消费效应方面，通过对各区域数据的整理发现：1）四个区域总需求构成占GDP比重及其统计标准差都存在明显差异。2）区域间居民平均消费倾向差异较大。无论是城镇居民平均消费倾向还是农村居民平均消费倾向，西部与东北部都高于东部与中部。举例来说，相对于其它三个地区，西部地区农村收入水平最低，平均消费倾向应该最高。而从实际数据来看（2006年至2010年）西部农村居民平均消费倾向远高于其它三个地区，从而得以验证。因而总体上验证了收入的差异造成了平均消费倾向的差异。3）四大区域边际消费倾向虽然存在着差异，但这种差异已经在缩小。
（2）在投资效应方面，通过对三个渠道传导的初步分析，我们会发现：投资对利率的敏感度不高，投资效应的利率渠道不明显；我国资本市场正处于发展阶段，资产价格传导渠道的第一阶段，即货币政策对资产价格的影响阶段，其作用已经显现。但资产价格传导渠道的第二阶段，即资产价格对投资的影响阶段，资产价格的“托宾效应”存在，但较为弱小；从信贷传导渠道上看，在银行分布、存贷款分布、非银行金融机构分布、行业分布这些方面的实际情况，有利于货币政策在东部地区的传导，而在企业规模、企业所有制、银行对存款融资的依赖程度、企业对银行融资的依赖程度方面，更有利于货币政策在中、西、东北部地区的传导。所以就投资效应的信贷传导渠道来说，货币政策区域非对称性特征表现比较明显。对比这三个渠道，投资效应的区域非对称性主要是通过信贷传导渠道来表现的。
（3）在地区总供给曲线差异的因素分析方面，从（3.16）式可以看出，地区总供给曲线的水平位置和斜率状况都与通胀预期和产出波动有直接的关系。而通胀预期和产出波动又直接受到价格、工资刚性、预期、劳动生产率、外贸冲击、技术差异、资源禀赋、体制特征等差异的制约。因此，对地区总供给曲线差异的分析，可以从预期对价格形成的差异，地区劳动生产率差异，区域体制差异，资源禀赋差异等几方面进行。
因此，无论从消费效应角度，投资效应角度，还是从地区总供给曲线差异角度分析，货币政策区域非对称效应在我国表现明显。当然，此时的结论主要采用的是量化分析方法，还需要采用计量实证方法进一步验证。
本文主要涉及的计量方法有VAR（VectorAutoregressionModel）、面板数据模型、HP滤波以及OLS（普通最小二乘法）。通过这些计量方法进一步验证初步量化分析的结果。在论文的第五章，通过实证检验得出的结论有：
就投资效应的区域非对称性来看，在信贷传导渠道的第一阶段，货币供应量对各地区新增信贷的影响存在明显的区域非对称性。货币政策对东部新增信贷影响最大，对中部与西部新增信贷影响次之，对东北部新增信贷影响最小；而在信贷传导渠道的第二阶段，即新增信贷对各地区投资的影响阶段，东部地区新增信贷对投资的拉动作用明显，远远强于中部、西部和东北部地区；中部比西部的新增信贷对投资的拉动作用明显一些，但是二者相差不大。
就消费效应的区域非对称性来看，它主要通过资产价格渠道，即房地产价格渠道和股票价格渠道来表现的：（1）在房地产价格渠道传导的第一阶段，即货币供应量对各地区房产价格的影响阶段，货币政策对房产价格的冲击存在明显的区域非对称性。各地区房产价格的脉冲响应函数也表明：相对于西部和东北部，货币政策对东部与中部房产价格的影响持续时间长；而在货币政策传导的第二阶段，即各地区房产价格对消费的影响阶段，房产价格对消费的影响也存在明显的区域非对称性。四个地区的面板数据模型也充分证明了这一点，即东部消费受房产价格的影响最大，明显高于其它三个地区。（2）在股票价格渠道传导的第一阶段，即货币政策影响股票价格变动阶段。在这一阶段，货币政策对股票市场价格的影响在短期内是比较明显的。货币供应量增加会立马影响到股票价格，但是在短期内这种作用效果会迅速递减，到第三期时这种影响效果已经递减为零。因此在股票价格渠道传导的第一阶段，货币政策对股票价格的影响存在但持续时间较短；在股票价格渠道传导的第二阶段，即股票价格的“财富效应“阶段。股票价格的财富效应在各地区短期内表现为负效应，即股票价格上涨，地区的居民消费反而降低。为了更明确股票价格的“财富效应”所表现出来的“价格和消费之间的关系”，我们通过OLS回归同样发现股票价格与各地区消费依然为负向关系，这说明在股票价格传导渠道的第二阶段货币政策传导不通畅，股票价格的财富效应无法显现出来。因此，消费效应的区域非对称效应主要通过房产价格的“财富效应”来体现的。
就地区总供给曲线差异来看，回归式中的系数“β”的倒数是经典分析货币政策效应“P-Y”坐标平面上的短期总供给曲线的斜率，且“β”的回归结果为正，因此可知各省市的短期总供给曲线斜率为正，即短期总供给曲线是斜向上方的，并且根据系数的大小可以得出：东部与东北部斜率最小，它们的短期总供给曲线也最平缓；而中西部斜率最大，它们的短期总供给曲线也相对较陡。其经济学意义就是：当货币政策正向冲击导致价格发生一个单位的变化时，产出变化最大的是东部与东北部省市，而中、西部省市的产出变化相对较小。因此货币政策区域非对称效应通过各地区短期总供给曲线的差异表现出来。通过上述量化和实证的分析，解释并验证了我国存在货币政策区域非对称效应以及产生该效应的根本原因，但是怎样缓解我国货币政策区域非对称效应呢？就我国的实际国情，本文提出了相关政策建议。
The regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy is separated from the connotation on asymmetry of the monetary policy. Scott (1955) made the earliest study of the regional effects of monetary policy. Cover (1992) in their published paper,"The asymmetric effects on positive and negative currency impact " put forward to the concept of asymmetric effects of monetary policy, followed by generally accepted theoretical circles. With the deepening of theoretical studies of monetary policy, the content and forms on the asymmetric effects of monetary policy were gradually enriched. The regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy are mainly shown by the inconsistency in time and space dimensions, specific sub-divided into three aspects. First, the asymmetric effect of monetary policy (asymmetric effect):the stimulation from expansionary monetary policy on the economy during the economy recession phase is less than the deceleration by tightening of monetary policy on the economy during economic overheating stage; Second, time inconsistency on the effect of monetary policy (time inconsistency):during the dynamic game between the government and the public, public behavior has changed policy environment. So the optimal policy enacted early by government may lose optimality in the implementation phase.In order to avoid losses, the government does not really implement the original policy, but to take the discretionary policy, re-choosing the best policy; Third, the regional effects of monetary policy (regional effects), or called by space inconsistency in corresponds to time Inconsistency, mainly shows that the same monetary policy will produce the different effects in different economic regions. The first two aspects in the study of these three aspects have been on relatively long time both in the domestic and international research.The third aspect of the study formally began in the1970s in some foreign countries. Some success has been gotten in this studying area in recent years, but this is the beginning. The comment of this article is mainly carried out for the third aspect---the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy.
With the further deepening of China's Reform and opening up and of the process of marketization, the regional characteristics of China's economy is increasingly evident.Both from the perspective of the financial system, industrial structure point of view, and the comprehensive point of view, China's regional economy is more suitable to be divided into the eastern region, the central region, the western region and the northeastern region. The theme of this paper is to explore the most fundamental reason for producing the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy from the regional aggregate demand and aggregate supply point of view. In view of the theme of this paper, by comparing the four regions'economic and financial situation, the large differences in regional economies can be found in regional economies in China. In this situiation, will China's implementation of a unified monetary policy have the regional asymmetric effects? and what is the resean for the generation of regional asymmetric effects?
In views of these issues, this article made its comprehensive analysis from the macro-level, gradually penetrating to the micro-level. Firstly, China's monetary policy objectives and the transmission mechanism are reviewed.And then, on the one hand, based on regional demand factors, respectively from the perspective of consumption effects and investment effects,this paper made analysis of the realistic basis of regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy; On the other hand, based on the theory of short-term aggregate supply curve, from the perspective of differences caused by the regional aggregate supply curve, the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy were also analyzed. From these two aspects of analysis, the conclusions are:
(1) In views of the consumption effect, by the analysis and collation from regional data we found that:the proportion of the respective total demand accounting for GDP and a statistical standard deviation of the proportion are significantly different; The average propensity to consume of the four regional residents are quite different.Both town average propensity to consume and rural residents'propensity to consume, the west region and northeast region are higher than the eastern region and central region, generally verifying that the defference between the average propensity to consume is caused by the income deference; there are differences among four regions'marginal propensity to consume, but this difference has been narrowing.
(2) In views of investment effect, through preliminary analysis of the three channels we made such conclusion:In the investment effect, investment sensitivity to interest rates is not high.The investment effect by interest rate channel is not obvious; China's capital market is in a stage of development. In the first phase of asset prices channel, the effect on the impact of monetary policy on asset prices has already been shown. However in the second phase of asset prices channel, the effect on asset price impact on investment(the wealth effect of asset prices) exists, but relatively weak. So the investment effect of asset price channel is weak; From the point of view of credit channel, wether in the bank deposit distribution and loan distribution, or the distribution of non-bank financial institutions in the industry distribution, the conduction of monetary policy in the eastern region is relatively efficient. However, in the enterprise scale, business ownership, banks'relying on deposit and enterprices' relying on bank loan, the conduction of monetary policy in the west region is more conducive. Therefore, the regional investment effects on monetary policy is on the more obvious characteristics of the regional asymmetry. Therefore, by the comparison of these three channels, the investment effects on regional asymmetry is more prominent in the credit transmission channel.
(3) In views of different factors that cause aggregate supply curve'difference, seen from the analysis of theoretical, the level position and slope conditions of the aggregate supply curve have a direct relationship with inflation expectations and output volatility. Inflation expectations and output volatility are directly subject to the constraints of price, wage rigidity, the difference of the expectation, labor productivity, foreign trade shocks, technical differences in resource endowments, institutional characteristics and so on. Therefore, we can make analysis on the difference of aggregate supply curve from the following aspects:the difference from the expected price formation, differences in regional labor productivity, differences on regional institutional and resource endowments.
Therefore, whether in terms of regional aggregate demand (the consumption effect, the investment effect) point of view, or from the perspective of the total supply (regional aggregate supply curve), it is obvious that the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy exists in our country.
Of course, these conclusions is mainly drawn by quantitative methods and need using econometrics methods to validate. This paper mainly involves the measurement of VAR (Vector Autoregression Model), pool model, the HP filter and the OLS (ordinary least squares) method. By these measurement methods, the further conclusions validate the results of preliminary quantitative analysis.The further conclusions are:
(1) In terms of the regional asymmetry on the investment effect of monetary policy, in the first phase of the credit transmission channel, the money supply impact on new credit loan in each region has an obvious asymmetry. Monetary policy'effect on the new credit in eastern regions is the most obvious. The effect on the central regions and western regions is the second. The effect on the northeast region is minimal; In the second phase of the credit transmission channel, that is the stage of the new credit loan impact on regional consumption, the pulling effect of the eastern part of the new credit on investment is far stronger than the central, western and northeastern regions.
(2) In terms of the asymmetry on the consuming effect of monetary policy, in the first phase of monetary policy transmission, that is, the stage of the impact money supply on regional house prices, there are significant regional asymmetry on the impact of monetary policy on house prices. The impulse response function of the regional house prices also showed that:compared to the west and northeast, the duration of the impact of monetary policy on the eastern and central house prices is more persistent; In the second phase of the monetary policy transmission, that is, the stage of the impact of regional house prices on consumption, there are clear regional asymmetry in the impact of house prices on consumption. Four regions of the panel data model also has fully proved that the eastern consumption by the impact of house prices significantly higher than the other three regions.
(3) In terms of differences among the aggregate supply curves, due to the reciprocal of the " β "coefficient in the regression equation is short-term aggregate supply curve slope in the classic analysis of the monetary policy effect in the"P-Y" coordinate plane. The short-term aggregate supply slopes in various provinces and cities is positive, then the short-term total supply curves oblique from the bottom to the top. And according to the size of the regression equation coefficients some conclusions can be drawn:The slopes both in eastern and northeastern regions are the smaller than other regions. So their curves are relatively gentle; The short-term aggregate supply slopes in the central and western regions are relative bigger. So their curves are relatively steep. Its economic application is that:given a unit in price changes from positive impact of monetary policy, the changes in output in the eastern and northeastern provinces and cities is larger than the ones in output in the western provinces and cities. Thus the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy is also shown by differences in regional short-term aggregate supply curve.
Through the quantitative and qualitative analysis, we have shown "why the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy exisits in China?" But how to alleviate the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy? According to our country's actual conditions, this paper presents the relevant policy recommendations.
我国经济发展的区域特性随改革开放和市场化的进程越发突出，由此引发对货币政策区域非对称效应问题更加关注。区域特性可以从产业结构、企业结构、以及金融体系等地区差异因素体现出来，根据这些经济结构因素的差异，再综合区域地理位置的分布特征，本文认为我国区域经济体系更适合划分为东部、中部、西部、东北部四个地区。本文的研究主题是从地区总需求和总供给角度探讨产生我国货币政策区域非对称效应问题。根据本文的研究主题，我们首先要搞清楚什么是货币政策区域非对称效应问题？其次，在此基础上还要搞清楚为什么会存在区域非对称效应问题，即产生该效应的主要影响因素有哪些？
对这些问题的研究，本文主要从宏观层面逐渐渗透到微观层面对其进行了全面分析。其中第四、五章是本文的核心部分，论文结论也主要来自这两章。第四章的结论主要通过两方面分析得到的。一方面基于地区需求因素，分别从消费效应和投资效应的角度对我国货币政策区域非对称效应的现实基础进行了分析；另一方面基于短期总供给曲线理论，从造成地区总供给曲线差异的角度，对我国货币政策区域非对称效应进行展开分析。通过上述两方面的分析，本文所得出的结论有：
（1）在消费效应方面，通过对各区域数据的整理发现：1）四个区域总需求构成占GDP比重及其统计标准差都存在明显差异。2）区域间居民平均消费倾向差异较大。无论是城镇居民平均消费倾向还是农村居民平均消费倾向，西部与东北部都高于东部与中部。举例来说，相对于其它三个地区，西部地区农村收入水平最低，平均消费倾向应该最高。而从实际数据来看（2006年至2010年）西部农村居民平均消费倾向远高于其它三个地区，从而得以验证。因而总体上验证了收入的差异造成了平均消费倾向的差异。3）四大区域边际消费倾向虽然存在着差异，但这种差异已经在缩小。
（2）在投资效应方面，通过对三个渠道传导的初步分析，我们会发现：投资对利率的敏感度不高，投资效应的利率渠道不明显；我国资本市场正处于发展阶段，资产价格传导渠道的第一阶段，即货币政策对资产价格的影响阶段，其作用已经显现。但资产价格传导渠道的第二阶段，即资产价格对投资的影响阶段，资产价格的“托宾效应”存在，但较为弱小；从信贷传导渠道上看，在银行分布、存贷款分布、非银行金融机构分布、行业分布这些方面的实际情况，有利于货币政策在东部地区的传导，而在企业规模、企业所有制、银行对存款融资的依赖程度、企业对银行融资的依赖程度方面，更有利于货币政策在中、西、东北部地区的传导。所以就投资效应的信贷传导渠道来说，货币政策区域非对称性特征表现比较明显。对比这三个渠道，投资效应的区域非对称性主要是通过信贷传导渠道来表现的。
（3）在地区总供给曲线差异的因素分析方面，从（3.16）式可以看出，地区总供给曲线的水平位置和斜率状况都与通胀预期和产出波动有直接的关系。而通胀预期和产出波动又直接受到价格、工资刚性、预期、劳动生产率、外贸冲击、技术差异、资源禀赋、体制特征等差异的制约。因此，对地区总供给曲线差异的分析，可以从预期对价格形成的差异，地区劳动生产率差异，区域体制差异，资源禀赋差异等几方面进行。
因此，无论从消费效应角度，投资效应角度，还是从地区总供给曲线差异角度分析，货币政策区域非对称效应在我国表现明显。当然，此时的结论主要采用的是量化分析方法，还需要采用计量实证方法进一步验证。
本文主要涉及的计量方法有VAR（VectorAutoregressionModel）、面板数据模型、HP滤波以及OLS（普通最小二乘法）。通过这些计量方法进一步验证初步量化分析的结果。在论文的第五章，通过实证检验得出的结论有：
就投资效应的区域非对称性来看，在信贷传导渠道的第一阶段，货币供应量对各地区新增信贷的影响存在明显的区域非对称性。货币政策对东部新增信贷影响最大，对中部与西部新增信贷影响次之，对东北部新增信贷影响最小；而在信贷传导渠道的第二阶段，即新增信贷对各地区投资的影响阶段，东部地区新增信贷对投资的拉动作用明显，远远强于中部、西部和东北部地区；中部比西部的新增信贷对投资的拉动作用明显一些，但是二者相差不大。
就消费效应的区域非对称性来看，它主要通过资产价格渠道，即房地产价格渠道和股票价格渠道来表现的：（1）在房地产价格渠道传导的第一阶段，即货币供应量对各地区房产价格的影响阶段，货币政策对房产价格的冲击存在明显的区域非对称性。各地区房产价格的脉冲响应函数也表明：相对于西部和东北部，货币政策对东部与中部房产价格的影响持续时间长；而在货币政策传导的第二阶段，即各地区房产价格对消费的影响阶段，房产价格对消费的影响也存在明显的区域非对称性。四个地区的面板数据模型也充分证明了这一点，即东部消费受房产价格的影响最大，明显高于其它三个地区。（2）在股票价格渠道传导的第一阶段，即货币政策影响股票价格变动阶段。在这一阶段，货币政策对股票市场价格的影响在短期内是比较明显的。货币供应量增加会立马影响到股票价格，但是在短期内这种作用效果会迅速递减，到第三期时这种影响效果已经递减为零。因此在股票价格渠道传导的第一阶段，货币政策对股票价格的影响存在但持续时间较短；在股票价格渠道传导的第二阶段，即股票价格的“财富效应“阶段。股票价格的财富效应在各地区短期内表现为负效应，即股票价格上涨，地区的居民消费反而降低。为了更明确股票价格的“财富效应”所表现出来的“价格和消费之间的关系”，我们通过OLS回归同样发现股票价格与各地区消费依然为负向关系，这说明在股票价格传导渠道的第二阶段货币政策传导不通畅，股票价格的财富效应无法显现出来。因此，消费效应的区域非对称效应主要通过房产价格的“财富效应”来体现的。
就地区总供给曲线差异来看，回归式中的系数“β”的倒数是经典分析货币政策效应“P-Y”坐标平面上的短期总供给曲线的斜率，且“β”的回归结果为正，因此可知各省市的短期总供给曲线斜率为正，即短期总供给曲线是斜向上方的，并且根据系数的大小可以得出：东部与东北部斜率最小，它们的短期总供给曲线也最平缓；而中西部斜率最大，它们的短期总供给曲线也相对较陡。其经济学意义就是：当货币政策正向冲击导致价格发生一个单位的变化时，产出变化最大的是东部与东北部省市，而中、西部省市的产出变化相对较小。因此货币政策区域非对称效应通过各地区短期总供给曲线的差异表现出来。通过上述量化和实证的分析，解释并验证了我国存在货币政策区域非对称效应以及产生该效应的根本原因，但是怎样缓解我国货币政策区域非对称效应呢？就我国的实际国情，本文提出了相关政策建议。
The regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy is separated from the connotation on asymmetry of the monetary policy. Scott (1955) made the earliest study of the regional effects of monetary policy. Cover (1992) in their published paper,"The asymmetric effects on positive and negative currency impact " put forward to the concept of asymmetric effects of monetary policy, followed by generally accepted theoretical circles. With the deepening of theoretical studies of monetary policy, the content and forms on the asymmetric effects of monetary policy were gradually enriched. The regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy are mainly shown by the inconsistency in time and space dimensions, specific sub-divided into three aspects. First, the asymmetric effect of monetary policy (asymmetric effect):the stimulation from expansionary monetary policy on the economy during the economy recession phase is less than the deceleration by tightening of monetary policy on the economy during economic overheating stage; Second, time inconsistency on the effect of monetary policy (time inconsistency):during the dynamic game between the government and the public, public behavior has changed policy environment. So the optimal policy enacted early by government may lose optimality in the implementation phase.In order to avoid losses, the government does not really implement the original policy, but to take the discretionary policy, re-choosing the best policy; Third, the regional effects of monetary policy (regional effects), or called by space inconsistency in corresponds to time Inconsistency, mainly shows that the same monetary policy will produce the different effects in different economic regions. The first two aspects in the study of these three aspects have been on relatively long time both in the domestic and international research.The third aspect of the study formally began in the1970s in some foreign countries. Some success has been gotten in this studying area in recent years, but this is the beginning. The comment of this article is mainly carried out for the third aspect---the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy.
With the further deepening of China's Reform and opening up and of the process of marketization, the regional characteristics of China's economy is increasingly evident.Both from the perspective of the financial system, industrial structure point of view, and the comprehensive point of view, China's regional economy is more suitable to be divided into the eastern region, the central region, the western region and the northeastern region. The theme of this paper is to explore the most fundamental reason for producing the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy from the regional aggregate demand and aggregate supply point of view. In view of the theme of this paper, by comparing the four regions'economic and financial situation, the large differences in regional economies can be found in regional economies in China. In this situiation, will China's implementation of a unified monetary policy have the regional asymmetric effects? and what is the resean for the generation of regional asymmetric effects?
In views of these issues, this article made its comprehensive analysis from the macro-level, gradually penetrating to the micro-level. Firstly, China's monetary policy objectives and the transmission mechanism are reviewed.And then, on the one hand, based on regional demand factors, respectively from the perspective of consumption effects and investment effects,this paper made analysis of the realistic basis of regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy; On the other hand, based on the theory of short-term aggregate supply curve, from the perspective of differences caused by the regional aggregate supply curve, the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy were also analyzed. From these two aspects of analysis, the conclusions are:
(1) In views of the consumption effect, by the analysis and collation from regional data we found that:the proportion of the respective total demand accounting for GDP and a statistical standard deviation of the proportion are significantly different; The average propensity to consume of the four regional residents are quite different.Both town average propensity to consume and rural residents'propensity to consume, the west region and northeast region are higher than the eastern region and central region, generally verifying that the defference between the average propensity to consume is caused by the income deference; there are differences among four regions'marginal propensity to consume, but this difference has been narrowing.
(2) In views of investment effect, through preliminary analysis of the three channels we made such conclusion:In the investment effect, investment sensitivity to interest rates is not high.The investment effect by interest rate channel is not obvious; China's capital market is in a stage of development. In the first phase of asset prices channel, the effect on the impact of monetary policy on asset prices has already been shown. However in the second phase of asset prices channel, the effect on asset price impact on investment(the wealth effect of asset prices) exists, but relatively weak. So the investment effect of asset price channel is weak; From the point of view of credit channel, wether in the bank deposit distribution and loan distribution, or the distribution of non-bank financial institutions in the industry distribution, the conduction of monetary policy in the eastern region is relatively efficient. However, in the enterprise scale, business ownership, banks'relying on deposit and enterprices' relying on bank loan, the conduction of monetary policy in the west region is more conducive. Therefore, the regional investment effects on monetary policy is on the more obvious characteristics of the regional asymmetry. Therefore, by the comparison of these three channels, the investment effects on regional asymmetry is more prominent in the credit transmission channel.
(3) In views of different factors that cause aggregate supply curve'difference, seen from the analysis of theoretical, the level position and slope conditions of the aggregate supply curve have a direct relationship with inflation expectations and output volatility. Inflation expectations and output volatility are directly subject to the constraints of price, wage rigidity, the difference of the expectation, labor productivity, foreign trade shocks, technical differences in resource endowments, institutional characteristics and so on. Therefore, we can make analysis on the difference of aggregate supply curve from the following aspects:the difference from the expected price formation, differences in regional labor productivity, differences on regional institutional and resource endowments.
Therefore, whether in terms of regional aggregate demand (the consumption effect, the investment effect) point of view, or from the perspective of the total supply (regional aggregate supply curve), it is obvious that the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy exists in our country.
Of course, these conclusions is mainly drawn by quantitative methods and need using econometrics methods to validate. This paper mainly involves the measurement of VAR (Vector Autoregression Model), pool model, the HP filter and the OLS (ordinary least squares) method. By these measurement methods, the further conclusions validate the results of preliminary quantitative analysis.The further conclusions are:
(1) In terms of the regional asymmetry on the investment effect of monetary policy, in the first phase of the credit transmission channel, the money supply impact on new credit loan in each region has an obvious asymmetry. Monetary policy'effect on the new credit in eastern regions is the most obvious. The effect on the central regions and western regions is the second. The effect on the northeast region is minimal; In the second phase of the credit transmission channel, that is the stage of the new credit loan impact on regional consumption, the pulling effect of the eastern part of the new credit on investment is far stronger than the central, western and northeastern regions.
(2) In terms of the asymmetry on the consuming effect of monetary policy, in the first phase of monetary policy transmission, that is, the stage of the impact money supply on regional house prices, there are significant regional asymmetry on the impact of monetary policy on house prices. The impulse response function of the regional house prices also showed that:compared to the west and northeast, the duration of the impact of monetary policy on the eastern and central house prices is more persistent; In the second phase of the monetary policy transmission, that is, the stage of the impact of regional house prices on consumption, there are clear regional asymmetry in the impact of house prices on consumption. Four regions of the panel data model also has fully proved that the eastern consumption by the impact of house prices significantly higher than the other three regions.
(3) In terms of differences among the aggregate supply curves, due to the reciprocal of the " β "coefficient in the regression equation is short-term aggregate supply curve slope in the classic analysis of the monetary policy effect in the"P-Y" coordinate plane. The short-term aggregate supply slopes in various provinces and cities is positive, then the short-term total supply curves oblique from the bottom to the top. And according to the size of the regression equation coefficients some conclusions can be drawn:The slopes both in eastern and northeastern regions are the smaller than other regions. So their curves are relatively gentle; The short-term aggregate supply slopes in the central and western regions are relative bigger. So their curves are relatively steep. Its economic application is that:given a unit in price changes from positive impact of monetary policy, the changes in output in the eastern and northeastern provinces and cities is larger than the ones in output in the western provinces and cities. Thus the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy is also shown by differences in regional short-term aggregate supply curve.
Through the quantitative and qualitative analysis, we have shown "why the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy exisits in China?" But how to alleviate the regional asymmetric effects of monetary policy? According to our country's actual conditions, this paper presents the relevant policy recommendations.
引文
[1]戴金平.金永军.货币政策的行业非对称效应.世界经济，2006，7
[2]蒋益民.陈璋.SVAR模型框架下货币政策区域效应的实证研究.金融研究，2009，4
[3]陈宇峰.中国货币供给内生性的实证检验.统计与决策.2006，4
[4]王有光.货币政策有效性与货币供给内生性的关系研究.经济经纬，2009，4
[5]宋旺、钟正生.我国货币政策区域效应的存在性及原因—基于最优货币区理论的分析.经济研究，2006，3
[6]卡尔.E.沃什（Carl.E.Walsh）.货币理论与政策.上海财经大学出版社.13-14
[7]陈安平.我国财政货币政策的区域差异效应研究.数量经济技术经济研究，2007，6
[8]杨晓，杨开忠.中国货币政策影响的区域差异性研究.财经研究，2007，2
[9]曹永琴.中国货币政策效应的区域差异研究.数量经济技术经济研究，2007，9
[10]汪增群，束庆年.货币政策区域非对称效应最新研究进展.中国社会科学院学报，2007，6
[11]张晶.中国货币政策区域效应差异及其原因研究.广东金融学院学报，2006，4
[12]丁文丽.转轨时期中国货币政策效力区域非对称性实证研究——基于VAR模型的经验分析.经济科学，2006，6
[13]刘郁葱.银行体制影响货币政策区域效应分析.中国经济问题，2010，4
[14]王满仓，王里.中国货币政策区域化的理论与实证研究.西北大学学报，2006，2
[15]胡振华，胡绪红.金融结构差异与货币政策的区域效应.财贸研究,2007，5
[16]董绳周.我国区域金融发展研究:[博士士学位论文].天津：天津大学，2007
[17]耿识博，谢士强.货币政策区域不对称效应.金融研究，2005，7
[18]何晓夏.我国货币政策区域不对称效应的金融结构因素.云南财经大学学报，2010，2
[19]赵进文，闵捷.央行货币政策操作效果非对称性实证研究.经济研究，2005，2
[20]樊向前，戴国海.影响居民消费行为的信贷条件分析—基于2002-2009年我国城镇居民消费的实证研究.财经理论与实践，2010，11
[21]韩蓓.货币政策区域效应的微观今析：信用传导机制视角.首都经济贸易大学学报，2009，2
[22]吴伟军，方霞.居民储蓄行为差异对货币政策区域效应的影响.山西财经大学学报，2008，11
[23]陈学彬，杨凌.货币政策效应的微观基础研究——我国居民消费储蓄行为的实证分析.复旦学报（社会科学版），2005，1
[24]孙凤.预防性储蓄理论与中国居民消费行为.南开经济研究，2001，1
[25]戴根有.中国货币政策传导机制研究.经济科学出版社，2001
[26]卢盛荣，邹文杰.货币政策地区效应的微观基础研究：我国省际居民消费储蓄行为的实证分析.经济科学，2006，5
[27]孙天琦.货币政策:统一前提下部分内容的区域差别化研究.金融研究，2004，5
[28]索彦峰，陈继明.中国货币政策的区域效应研究——来自信用观点的解释.当代经济科学，2007，6
[29]李雅丽.基于信贷渠道视角的我国货币政策区域效应探析.经济经纬，2007，6
[30]汪洋.中国货币政策工具研究.中国金融出版社.2009
[31]陈红，王伟.股票市场、中长期信贷与经济增长的实证分析——以湖北省为例.中南财经政法大学学报，2010，4
[32]汪增群.中国货币政策区域非对称效应.社会科学文献出版社2011.1
[33]陈学彬.对我国经济运行中的菲利普斯曲线关系和通胀预期的实证分析.财经研究1996.08
[34]刘树成.论中国的菲利普斯曲线.管理世界,1997.6
[35]黎德福.二元经济条件下中国的菲利普斯曲线和奥肯法则.世界经济,2005，8
[36]张焕明.1979年～2000年我国菲利普斯曲线的实证研究.管理科学2003，2
[37]胡乃武.中国总供给曲线性质的实证分析.数量经济技术经济研究2003，12
[38]钱宥妮.菲利普斯曲线在中国经济中的实证研究——基于产出缺口的分析.财经研究2005，6
[39]郑超愚.论中国附加预期和需求的总供给函数.经济研究，1999.04
[40]余永定.通过加总推出的总供给曲线.经济研究，2002.09
[41]曹永琴.中国货币政策效应的区域差异研究.数量经济与技术经济研究，2007，9
[42]冯涛乔笙.通货膨胀中的地方政府金融行为分析.财贸经济，2006，2
[43]许鑫.中国区域劳动生产率存在趋同吗.南开经济研究，2005.1
[44]闫雪晶.中国区域总供给曲线斜率差异性分析.合作经济与科技，2009.4
[45]王述英，蓝庆新.我国产业劳动生产率与产业利润率的国际比较.学术研究，2003.7
[46]王煜.中国的产出缺口与通货膨胀.数量经济技术经济研究，2005，1
[47]常海滨，徐成贤.我国货币政策传导机制区域差异的实证分析.经济科学，2007，5
[48]董志勇黄迈等.我国货币政策区域效应的度量与成因分析.经济理论与经济管理2010，10
[49]曾拥政.货币政策区域非对称性效应研究评述.金融理论与实践，2011，1
[50]高晓红.非均衡区域经济格局中的货币政策.理论探索，2001,1
[51]何小燕，孟青霄.国外货币政策区域化.市场论坛，2008，11
[52]曾拥政.我国货币政策区域非对称性效应:来自投资的解释.新疆社会科学,2011,7
[53]汪增群，束庆年.货币政策区域非对称性效应最新研究进展.中国社会科学院研究生院学报.2007，11
[54]周孟亮，李明贤.中国货币政策外部传导效应区域差异化研究.金融理论与实践，2009,11
[55]王忠.货币政策区域效应的影响因素分析.金融与经济，2011，6
[56]吕素香，汪增群.中国货币政策区域非对称性效应——基于结构向量自回归模型(SVAR)的检验.北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)，2009，1
[57]孙凤.预防性储蓄与中国居民消费行为.南开经济研究.2001，1
[58]张萌.货币政策区域效应的文献综述.新西部，2010，12
[59]李海海.中国货币政策区域效应研究:[博士学位论文].上海：华东师范大学，2006
[60]闫红波，王国林.我国货币政策产业效应的非对称性研究——来自制造业的实证.数量经济技术经济研究，2008，5
[61]黄飞鸣.货币政策区域效应的调控新范式.金融理论与实践，2011，9
[62]柯冬梅.最优货币区理论及其对中国货币政策的借鉴.中央财经大学学报，2001,1
[63]卞志村，杨全年.中国货币政策效应的区域性配给均衡分析.金融研究，2009，9
[64]王忠.货币政策区域效应的影响因素分析.金融与经济，2011，6
[65]陆玲玲.中国货币政策区域效应的实证研究:[硕士学位论文].上海：上海交通大学，2010
[66]张晶.货币政策区域效应研究前沿评述.湖北经济学院学报，2007，3
[67]国外货币政策区域效应研究进展.（http://www.100jrxx.com）
[68]关于“十一五”规划区域划分的思考（http://www.21read.com）
[69]王维安，王丹.货币政策区域非对称效应研究述评.重庆大学学报(社会科学版)，2009，7
[70]梅春.最优货币区理论与我国货币政策研究.玉林师范学院学报，2008，2
[71]战明华,李生校.货币与产出的关系(1995~2003):不同模型的分析结果及其比较.世界经济，2005，8
[72]史玉伟.消费函数理论主要假说述评.经济经纬，2005，5
[73]徐索菲.中国城镇居民消费需求变动及影响因素研究:[博士学位论文].吉林：吉林大学，2011
[74]总需求函数-经典微观理论-人大经济论坛-经管百科网络，（http://www.pinggu.com/doc-view-538.html）
[75]王铮.货币政策冲击与我国区域经济波动的动态关联研究.经济问题，2010,12
[76]郭田勇.资产价格、通货膨胀与中国货币政策体系的完善.金融研究，2006，10
[77]卢盛荣.货币政策地区效应——基于地区总供给曲线的理论与实证分析.数量经济技术经济研究，2007，3
[78]童海华.我们完全有信心走出当前困境.中国经济导报，2009，3
[79]秦箐.坚持适度宽松货币政策不动摇.中国金融家，2009，3
[80]周小川.央行行长周小川：新增贷款投放力度将继续观察-财经频道.金融界，http://finance.jrj.com.cn/2009/03/0701183761785.shtml
[81]闵正良.对菲利普斯曲线的几点补正.甘肃社会科学，2011，7
[82]董志勇，黄迈等.我国货币政策区域效应的度量与成因分析.经济理论与经济管理，2010，10
[83]王姗，江雪.基于面向未来的消费理论对我国刺激居民消费政策的分析.现代商贸工业，2010，4
[84]林海.西部投资环境的评价与建构.经济问题探索，2005，4
[85]赵平.企业负债率:形成我国货币政策区城效果差异的重要因素.上海金融，2006，8
[86]张细松.国外货币政策区域非对称效应研究述评.上海金融,2011,11
[87]张颖.西方货币政策传导机制理论的探讨.学术论坛,2002,1
[88]曾宪久.货币政策传导机制论.中国金融出版社,2000,4
[89]高铁梅.计量经济分析方法与建模Eviews应用及实例.北京：清华大学出版,2006
[90]汪增群.中国货币政策区域非对称性效应.社会科学文献出版社.2007
[91]刘金山.乘数效应与区域收敛.经济科学出版社.2007
[92]支大林,于尚艳.区域金融理论与实证研究.商务印书馆.2008
[93]陈学彬.货币政策微观基础—中国居民消费和投资行为动态模拟研究.复旦大学出版社.2010
[1]Arnold, I.J.MandE.B.Vrugt..Regional Effeets of Monetary Poliey in the Netherlands, International Journal of Business and Eeonomies,2002, Vol.1, No.2, pP123—134
[2]Amit Dasgupta and Nephil Matangi Maskay. Monetary Integration in South Asia Financial Policy Cooperation in SAARC:A First Step towards Greater.20034:133South Asia Economic Journal
[3]Adam Elbourne, Jakob de Haan. Financial structure and monetary policy transmission in transition countries, Journal of Comparative Economics.2006,Vol.34,No.l,p.1-23.
[4]Aksoy, Y, P De Grauwe, H. Dewachter.Do Asymmetries Matter for European Monetary Policy? European Economic Review.2002(46).
[5]Allen,C. and J.L. Vega,(1997)."The Credit Channel in the Monetary Transmission Process in the EU countries", MESD mimeo, European Monetary Institute.
[6]Alessandra Guariglia, Simona Mateut. Credit channel, trade credit channel,and inventory investment:Evidence from a panel of UK firms. Journal of Banking&Finance, Volume30, Issue10, October2006, Pages2835-2856.
[7]Almila Karasoy, KUrgat Kunter and Vuslat Us. Monetary transmission mechanism in Turkey under free float using a small-scale macroeconomic model. Economic Modelling, Volume22, Issue6, December2005, Pages1064-1073.
[8]Andrewhughes Hallett, Laura Piscitelli. EMU in Reality:The Effect of a Common Monetary Policy on Economies with Different Transmission Mechanisms. Empirica26:337-358,1999.
[9]Bernanke,B. S. and Gertler,M. Inside the Black Box;The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission, Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(4):27-48.
[10]Bernanke, B. S.&Gentler, M.&Gilchrist, S. The Financial Accelerator and the Flight to Quality. TheReview of Economics and Statistics,1996,78(1):1-15.
[11]Beare.J. B. A Monetarist Model of Reginal Business Cycles.Journal of Regional Science1976,16(1:57-64)
[12]Beng Soon Chong, Ming-Hua Liu. Monetary transmission via the administered interest rates channel. Journal of Banking&Finance, Volume30, Issue5, May2006, Pages1467-1484.
[13]Bini Smaghi, L. and S. Vori. Rating the EC as an Optimal Currency Area. Temi di Discussione,1993, No.187, Banca d'ltalia, Rome.
[14]Blachard,Olivier and Danny Quach. The Dynamic Effect of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances. American Economic Review,1989,79:655-673.
[15]Britton, E. and J. Whitley,Comparing the Monetary Transmission Mechanism in France, Germany and the United Kingdom:Some issues and Results Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin,1997, May, pp.152—162.
[16]Carlino G, Defina R. The Differential Regional Effeets of Monetary Poliey. The Review of Eeonomies and Statistics,1998, PP.572—587
[17]Carlino G, Defina R. Do States Respond Differently to Changes in Monetary Poliey? Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelPhia Business Review(1999).17—27
[18]Carlino G, Defina R. The differential regional effects of monetary policy:Evidence from the U. S. states. Journal of Regional Science,1999,39:339-358.
[19]Chung-Hua Shen. Are the Effects of Monetary Policy Asymmetric? The Case of Taiwan. Journal of Policy Modeling22(2):197-218(2000)
[20]Charles L. Weise. The Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Policy:A Nonlinear Vector Autoregression Approach. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.31, No.1(Feb.,1999), pp.85-108
[21]Cecchetti S.Legal Structure, Financial Structure, and the Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism. FRBNY Economic Policy Review.1999(5)
[22]Charles S. Morris, Gordon H. Sellon Jr,"Bank Lending and Monetary Policy:Evidence on a credit channel. FRBKC Economic Review,1995,2Quarter, pp43-52
[23]Christiano, Lawrence J and L. Ljungqvist. Money Does Granger-Cause Output in the Bivariate Money-Output Relation"Journal of Monetary Economics1998,22.217-23.
[24]Cover. Asymmetric Effects of Positive and Negative Money-supply Shocks "Quarterly Journal of Economics,1992(17):1261—1282.
[25]David Dickinson, Jia LIU. The real effects of monetary policy in China:An empirical analysis. China Economic Review18(2007)87-111
[26]Daniele Bondonio. A Method to Compare the Performance of Economic Development Programmes Across Different Regions or States.20028:101Evaluation
[27]David Fielding and Kalvinder Shields. Regional Asymmetries in the Impact ofMonetary Policy Shocks on Prices:Evidence from US Cities. Empirica (2007)34:411-425
[28]Elboune A, De Haan J. Asymetric monetary transmission in EMU:the robustness of VAR conclusion and Cecchetti's legal family theory.CESifo working paper,2004,No.l327
[29]Edgar Ghossoub, Robert R. Reed III. Liquidity risk, economic development, and the effects of monetary policy. European Economic Review54(2010)252-268
[30]Fleming, Marcus J, On exchange rate unification, Economic Journal (81):467-488;
[31]Epstein, Larry C, and Zin, Stanley E. Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns:A Theoretical Framework. Econometrica.1989 46(July):937-969.
[32]European Central Bank. EU Banking Structures. Frankfurt,2005.
[33]Friedman,M. The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review1968, pp.1-17.
[34]Friedman, M. Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press,1953
[35]Fleming, J. On Exchange Rate Unification. The Economic Journal,1971,Vo.l81,pp.467-488
[36]Gaiottti and Andrea Generale.Does Monetary Policy Have Asymmetric Effeets? A Look at the Investment Decisions of Malian Firms.
[37]Georgopoulos, George. Measuring Regional Effects of Monetary Policy in Canada.
[38]Gertler, M. and Gilchrist, S. the Role of Credit Chan-nel of Monetary Transmission Mechanism; Arguments and Evidence.The Scandinavia Journal of Eco-nomics,1993,95(1):43-64.
[39]Giavcinto V. Differential regional effects of monetary policy:a geographical SVAR approach. Bancad' Italia Working Paper,2002(5).
[40]George Georgopoulos, Walid Hejazi. Financial structure and the heterogeneous impact of monetary policy across industries. Journal of Economics and Business61(2009)1-33
[41]Giorgio E. Primiceri. Time Varying Structural Vector Autoregressions and Monetary Policy. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.72, No.3(Jul,2005), pp.821-852
[42]Glenn D. Rudebusch. A Macro-Finance Model of the Term Structure, Monetary Policy, and the Economy. FRBSF Working2003(17).
[43]George Georgopoulos. Measuring Regional Effects of Monetary Policy in Canada. International Advances in Economic Research,2001(7).
[44]Hanna Putkuri.Cross-Country Asymmetries in Euro Area Monetary Transmission:the Role of National Financial Systems. Bank of Finland Discussion Paper.2003(15).
[45]Horvath, m. Empirical evidence on common money and uncommon regions in the US,1998paper presented at zei-conference."common money, uncommon regions". Bonn.
[46]Harberler, Gottfried. The International Monetary System:Some Recent Developments andDiscussions, edited by RobertA. Mundel1&Alexander K. Swoboda,1969(University of Chicago Press).
[47]Ingram, J. C. A proposal for integration in the Atlantic Community, in:Factors Affecting the UnitedStates Balance of Payments, Compilation of Studies Prepared for the Subcommittee on International Exchangeand Payments of the Joint Economic Committee of the Congress,1962, PP.175-207; Washington, D. C.:U. S.Government Printing Office.
[48]Ivo J. M. Arnold, Evert B. Vrugt. Firm Size, Industry Mix and the Regional Transmission of Monetary Policy in Germany.German Economic Review,2002,(5):35—42.
[49]Ira O. Scott, Jr. The Regional Impact of Monetary Policy, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1955,Vol.5,PP269-284.
[50]Ivo J. M. Arnold and Evert B. Vrugt. Firm Size, Industry Mix and the Regional Transmission of Monetary Policy in Germany. German Economic Review5(1):35-59
[51]King, M., The Transmission Mechanism of Monetary Policy, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin,1994, Vol.8,PP61-67.
[52]Lixin SUN, J.L. Ford, David G. Dickson. Bank loans and the effects of monetary policy in China:VAR/VECM approach. China Economic Review21(2010)65-97
[53]Laura Bottazzi and Paolo Manasse. Asymmetric Information and Monetary Policy in Common Currency Areas. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.37, No.4(Aug.,2005), pp.603-621
[54]Leonardo Gambacorta. Inside the bank lending channel. European Economic Review, Volume49, Issue7, October2005, Pages1737-1759.
[55]Luca Dedola, Francesco Lippi. The monetary transmission mechanism:Evidence from the industries of five DECD countries. European Economic Review,Volume49, Issue6, August2005, Pages1543—1569.
[56]Mundell Robert, A theory of optimum currency areas.AmerricanEconomicReview,1961Vol.51,No.4(September):657—665.
[57]Mario Forni, Luca Gambetti. The dynamic effects of monetary policy:A structural factor model approach. Journal of Monetary Economics57(2010)203-216
[58]Michael Ehrmann. Comparing Monetary Policy Transmission across European Countries Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv2000, Vol.136(1)
[59]Natalia Andries, Steve Billon. The effect of bank ownership and deposit insurance on monetary policy transmission. Journal of Banking&Finance34(2010)3050-3054
[60]Owyang, Michael T. and Wall, Howard J.Regonal VARs and the Channel of Monetary Policy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working paper,2006.
[61]Owyang, Michael T. and Wall, Howard J. Structural Breaks and Regional Disparities in the Transmission of Monetary Policy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working paper,2003.
[62]Owyang, M. T. and H. J. Wall. Structural Breaks and Regional Disparitiesin the Transmission of Monetary Policy". Working paper series, Working Paper2003-008B; Federal Reserve Bank of st. Louis:http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2003/2003-008.
[63]Peter Kenen. The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas:An Eclectic View, Monetary Problems of theInternational Economy,1969, pp.41-60.
[64]Peter van Els, Alberto Locarno, Benoit Mojon, Julian Morgan. New Macroeconomic Evidence on Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area. Source:Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol.1, No.2/3, Papers and Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Congress of the European Economic Association (Apr.-May,2003), pp.720-730
[65]Philipp Engler AE Terhi Jokipii AE Christian Merkl. The effect of capital requirement regulation on the transmission of monetary policy:evidence from Austria. Empirica (2007)34:411-425
[66]Robert Mundell. A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas.American Economics Review,1961,vol.51,pp.657-665.
[67]Ronald Mckinnon.(1963). Optimum Currency Areas, American Economic Review, vol.53.
[68]Reginald Darius. The macroeconomic effects of monetary and fiscal policy in a small open economy:Does the exchange rateregime matter?. Journal of International Money and Finance29(2010)1508-1528
[69]Sheila C Dow and Alberto Montagnoli. The Regional Transmission of UK Monetary Policy. Regional Studies,2005,2
[70]Sarantis Kalyvitisa,*, Ifigeneia Skotidab. Some empirical evidence on the effects of U.S. monetary policy shocks on cross exchange rates. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance50(2010)386-394
[71]Sylvia Kaufmann. Is there an asymmetric eoect of monetary policy over time? A Bayesian analysis using Austrian data. Empirical Economics (2002)27:277-297
[72]Tena J. Dios, A. Tremayna. Modeling monetary UK manufacturing industry.Universidad Carlos III de Madrid06-29(11). transmission in Working paper
[73]Toal, William D.(1977). Regional Impacts of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in the Postwar Period:Some Initial Tests. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, WorkingPaper.
[74]Sellon, Gordon H. Jr. The changing U. S. financial system:some implications for the monetary transmission mechanism. Economic Review (QI),2002pp.5-35.
[75]Valter Di Giacinto. Differential Regional Effects of Monetary Policy:A Geographical SVAR Approach. International Regional Science Review200326:313
[76]Yang, Z. and B. Turner. Regional Effects of Monetary Policy in the Property Market. Paper to be presented at the ENHR Conference July2nd—6th2004, Cambridge, UK.
[77]Zhang, Z. accession countries and the Konstanz. Asymmetries in monetary transmission channels between the EMU countries. Seminar:2005,International Monetary Integration.
[2]蒋益民.陈璋.SVAR模型框架下货币政策区域效应的实证研究.金融研究，2009，4
[3]陈宇峰.中国货币供给内生性的实证检验.统计与决策.2006，4
[4]王有光.货币政策有效性与货币供给内生性的关系研究.经济经纬，2009，4
[5]宋旺、钟正生.我国货币政策区域效应的存在性及原因—基于最优货币区理论的分析.经济研究，2006，3
[6]卡尔.E.沃什（Carl.E.Walsh）.货币理论与政策.上海财经大学出版社.13-14
[7]陈安平.我国财政货币政策的区域差异效应研究.数量经济技术经济研究，2007，6
[8]杨晓，杨开忠.中国货币政策影响的区域差异性研究.财经研究，2007，2
[9]曹永琴.中国货币政策效应的区域差异研究.数量经济技术经济研究，2007，9
[10]汪增群，束庆年.货币政策区域非对称效应最新研究进展.中国社会科学院学报，2007，6
[11]张晶.中国货币政策区域效应差异及其原因研究.广东金融学院学报，2006，4
[12]丁文丽.转轨时期中国货币政策效力区域非对称性实证研究——基于VAR模型的经验分析.经济科学，2006，6
[13]刘郁葱.银行体制影响货币政策区域效应分析.中国经济问题，2010，4
[14]王满仓，王里.中国货币政策区域化的理论与实证研究.西北大学学报，2006，2
[15]胡振华，胡绪红.金融结构差异与货币政策的区域效应.财贸研究,2007，5
[16]董绳周.我国区域金融发展研究:[博士士学位论文].天津：天津大学，2007
[17]耿识博，谢士强.货币政策区域不对称效应.金融研究，2005，7
[18]何晓夏.我国货币政策区域不对称效应的金融结构因素.云南财经大学学报，2010，2
[19]赵进文，闵捷.央行货币政策操作效果非对称性实证研究.经济研究，2005，2
[20]樊向前，戴国海.影响居民消费行为的信贷条件分析—基于2002-2009年我国城镇居民消费的实证研究.财经理论与实践，2010，11
[21]韩蓓.货币政策区域效应的微观今析：信用传导机制视角.首都经济贸易大学学报，2009，2
[22]吴伟军，方霞.居民储蓄行为差异对货币政策区域效应的影响.山西财经大学学报，2008，11
[23]陈学彬，杨凌.货币政策效应的微观基础研究——我国居民消费储蓄行为的实证分析.复旦学报（社会科学版），2005，1
[24]孙凤.预防性储蓄理论与中国居民消费行为.南开经济研究，2001，1
[25]戴根有.中国货币政策传导机制研究.经济科学出版社，2001
[26]卢盛荣，邹文杰.货币政策地区效应的微观基础研究：我国省际居民消费储蓄行为的实证分析.经济科学，2006，5
[27]孙天琦.货币政策:统一前提下部分内容的区域差别化研究.金融研究，2004，5
[28]索彦峰，陈继明.中国货币政策的区域效应研究——来自信用观点的解释.当代经济科学，2007，6
[29]李雅丽.基于信贷渠道视角的我国货币政策区域效应探析.经济经纬，2007，6
[30]汪洋.中国货币政策工具研究.中国金融出版社.2009
[31]陈红，王伟.股票市场、中长期信贷与经济增长的实证分析——以湖北省为例.中南财经政法大学学报，2010，4
[32]汪增群.中国货币政策区域非对称效应.社会科学文献出版社2011.1
[33]陈学彬.对我国经济运行中的菲利普斯曲线关系和通胀预期的实证分析.财经研究1996.08
[34]刘树成.论中国的菲利普斯曲线.管理世界,1997.6
[35]黎德福.二元经济条件下中国的菲利普斯曲线和奥肯法则.世界经济,2005，8
[36]张焕明.1979年～2000年我国菲利普斯曲线的实证研究.管理科学2003，2
[37]胡乃武.中国总供给曲线性质的实证分析.数量经济技术经济研究2003，12
[38]钱宥妮.菲利普斯曲线在中国经济中的实证研究——基于产出缺口的分析.财经研究2005，6
[39]郑超愚.论中国附加预期和需求的总供给函数.经济研究，1999.04
[40]余永定.通过加总推出的总供给曲线.经济研究，2002.09
[41]曹永琴.中国货币政策效应的区域差异研究.数量经济与技术经济研究，2007，9
[42]冯涛乔笙.通货膨胀中的地方政府金融行为分析.财贸经济，2006，2
[43]许鑫.中国区域劳动生产率存在趋同吗.南开经济研究，2005.1
[44]闫雪晶.中国区域总供给曲线斜率差异性分析.合作经济与科技，2009.4
[45]王述英，蓝庆新.我国产业劳动生产率与产业利润率的国际比较.学术研究，2003.7
[46]王煜.中国的产出缺口与通货膨胀.数量经济技术经济研究，2005，1
[47]常海滨，徐成贤.我国货币政策传导机制区域差异的实证分析.经济科学，2007，5
[48]董志勇黄迈等.我国货币政策区域效应的度量与成因分析.经济理论与经济管理2010，10
[49]曾拥政.货币政策区域非对称性效应研究评述.金融理论与实践，2011，1
[50]高晓红.非均衡区域经济格局中的货币政策.理论探索，2001,1
[51]何小燕，孟青霄.国外货币政策区域化.市场论坛，2008，11
[52]曾拥政.我国货币政策区域非对称性效应:来自投资的解释.新疆社会科学,2011,7
[53]汪增群，束庆年.货币政策区域非对称性效应最新研究进展.中国社会科学院研究生院学报.2007，11
[54]周孟亮，李明贤.中国货币政策外部传导效应区域差异化研究.金融理论与实践，2009,11
[55]王忠.货币政策区域效应的影响因素分析.金融与经济，2011，6
[56]吕素香，汪增群.中国货币政策区域非对称性效应——基于结构向量自回归模型(SVAR)的检验.北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)，2009，1
[57]孙凤.预防性储蓄与中国居民消费行为.南开经济研究.2001，1
[58]张萌.货币政策区域效应的文献综述.新西部，2010，12
[59]李海海.中国货币政策区域效应研究:[博士学位论文].上海：华东师范大学，2006
[60]闫红波，王国林.我国货币政策产业效应的非对称性研究——来自制造业的实证.数量经济技术经济研究，2008，5
[61]黄飞鸣.货币政策区域效应的调控新范式.金融理论与实践，2011，9
[62]柯冬梅.最优货币区理论及其对中国货币政策的借鉴.中央财经大学学报，2001,1
[63]卞志村，杨全年.中国货币政策效应的区域性配给均衡分析.金融研究，2009，9
[64]王忠.货币政策区域效应的影响因素分析.金融与经济，2011，6
[65]陆玲玲.中国货币政策区域效应的实证研究:[硕士学位论文].上海：上海交通大学，2010
[66]张晶.货币政策区域效应研究前沿评述.湖北经济学院学报，2007，3
[67]国外货币政策区域效应研究进展.（http://www.100jrxx.com）
[68]关于“十一五”规划区域划分的思考（http://www.21read.com）
[69]王维安，王丹.货币政策区域非对称效应研究述评.重庆大学学报(社会科学版)，2009，7
[70]梅春.最优货币区理论与我国货币政策研究.玉林师范学院学报，2008，2
[71]战明华,李生校.货币与产出的关系(1995~2003):不同模型的分析结果及其比较.世界经济，2005，8
[72]史玉伟.消费函数理论主要假说述评.经济经纬，2005，5
[73]徐索菲.中国城镇居民消费需求变动及影响因素研究:[博士学位论文].吉林：吉林大学，2011
[74]总需求函数-经典微观理论-人大经济论坛-经管百科网络，（http://www.pinggu.com/doc-view-538.html）
[75]王铮.货币政策冲击与我国区域经济波动的动态关联研究.经济问题，2010,12
[76]郭田勇.资产价格、通货膨胀与中国货币政策体系的完善.金融研究，2006，10
[77]卢盛荣.货币政策地区效应——基于地区总供给曲线的理论与实证分析.数量经济技术经济研究，2007，3
[78]童海华.我们完全有信心走出当前困境.中国经济导报，2009，3
[79]秦箐.坚持适度宽松货币政策不动摇.中国金融家，2009，3
[80]周小川.央行行长周小川：新增贷款投放力度将继续观察-财经频道.金融界，http://finance.jrj.com.cn/2009/03/0701183761785.shtml
[81]闵正良.对菲利普斯曲线的几点补正.甘肃社会科学，2011，7
[82]董志勇，黄迈等.我国货币政策区域效应的度量与成因分析.经济理论与经济管理，2010，10
[83]王姗，江雪.基于面向未来的消费理论对我国刺激居民消费政策的分析.现代商贸工业，2010，4
[84]林海.西部投资环境的评价与建构.经济问题探索，2005，4
[85]赵平.企业负债率:形成我国货币政策区城效果差异的重要因素.上海金融，2006，8
[86]张细松.国外货币政策区域非对称效应研究述评.上海金融,2011,11
[87]张颖.西方货币政策传导机制理论的探讨.学术论坛,2002,1
[88]曾宪久.货币政策传导机制论.中国金融出版社,2000,4
[89]高铁梅.计量经济分析方法与建模Eviews应用及实例.北京：清华大学出版,2006
[90]汪增群.中国货币政策区域非对称性效应.社会科学文献出版社.2007
[91]刘金山.乘数效应与区域收敛.经济科学出版社.2007
[92]支大林,于尚艳.区域金融理论与实证研究.商务印书馆.2008
[93]陈学彬.货币政策微观基础—中国居民消费和投资行为动态模拟研究.复旦大学出版社.2010
[1]Arnold, I.J.MandE.B.Vrugt..Regional Effeets of Monetary Poliey in the Netherlands, International Journal of Business and Eeonomies,2002, Vol.1, No.2, pP123—134
[2]Amit Dasgupta and Nephil Matangi Maskay. Monetary Integration in South Asia Financial Policy Cooperation in SAARC:A First Step towards Greater.20034:133South Asia Economic Journal
[3]Adam Elbourne, Jakob de Haan. Financial structure and monetary policy transmission in transition countries, Journal of Comparative Economics.2006,Vol.34,No.l,p.1-23.
[4]Aksoy, Y, P De Grauwe, H. Dewachter.Do Asymmetries Matter for European Monetary Policy? European Economic Review.2002(46).
[5]Allen,C. and J.L. Vega,(1997)."The Credit Channel in the Monetary Transmission Process in the EU countries", MESD mimeo, European Monetary Institute.
[6]Alessandra Guariglia, Simona Mateut. Credit channel, trade credit channel,and inventory investment:Evidence from a panel of UK firms. Journal of Banking&Finance, Volume30, Issue10, October2006, Pages2835-2856.
[7]Almila Karasoy, KUrgat Kunter and Vuslat Us. Monetary transmission mechanism in Turkey under free float using a small-scale macroeconomic model. Economic Modelling, Volume22, Issue6, December2005, Pages1064-1073.
[8]Andrewhughes Hallett, Laura Piscitelli. EMU in Reality:The Effect of a Common Monetary Policy on Economies with Different Transmission Mechanisms. Empirica26:337-358,1999.
[9]Bernanke,B. S. and Gertler,M. Inside the Black Box;The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission, Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(4):27-48.
[10]Bernanke, B. S.&Gentler, M.&Gilchrist, S. The Financial Accelerator and the Flight to Quality. TheReview of Economics and Statistics,1996,78(1):1-15.
[11]Beare.J. B. A Monetarist Model of Reginal Business Cycles.Journal of Regional Science1976,16(1:57-64)
[12]Beng Soon Chong, Ming-Hua Liu. Monetary transmission via the administered interest rates channel. Journal of Banking&Finance, Volume30, Issue5, May2006, Pages1467-1484.
[13]Bini Smaghi, L. and S. Vori. Rating the EC as an Optimal Currency Area. Temi di Discussione,1993, No.187, Banca d'ltalia, Rome.
[14]Blachard,Olivier and Danny Quach. The Dynamic Effect of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances. American Economic Review,1989,79:655-673.
[15]Britton, E. and J. Whitley,Comparing the Monetary Transmission Mechanism in France, Germany and the United Kingdom:Some issues and Results Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin,1997, May, pp.152—162.
[16]Carlino G, Defina R. The Differential Regional Effeets of Monetary Poliey. The Review of Eeonomies and Statistics,1998, PP.572—587
[17]Carlino G, Defina R. Do States Respond Differently to Changes in Monetary Poliey? Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelPhia Business Review(1999).17—27
[18]Carlino G, Defina R. The differential regional effects of monetary policy:Evidence from the U. S. states. Journal of Regional Science,1999,39:339-358.
[19]Chung-Hua Shen. Are the Effects of Monetary Policy Asymmetric? The Case of Taiwan. Journal of Policy Modeling22(2):197-218(2000)
[20]Charles L. Weise. The Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Policy:A Nonlinear Vector Autoregression Approach. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.31, No.1(Feb.,1999), pp.85-108
[21]Cecchetti S.Legal Structure, Financial Structure, and the Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism. FRBNY Economic Policy Review.1999(5)
[22]Charles S. Morris, Gordon H. Sellon Jr,"Bank Lending and Monetary Policy:Evidence on a credit channel. FRBKC Economic Review,1995,2Quarter, pp43-52
[23]Christiano, Lawrence J and L. Ljungqvist. Money Does Granger-Cause Output in the Bivariate Money-Output Relation"Journal of Monetary Economics1998,22.217-23.
[24]Cover. Asymmetric Effects of Positive and Negative Money-supply Shocks "Quarterly Journal of Economics,1992(17):1261—1282.
[25]David Dickinson, Jia LIU. The real effects of monetary policy in China:An empirical analysis. China Economic Review18(2007)87-111
[26]Daniele Bondonio. A Method to Compare the Performance of Economic Development Programmes Across Different Regions or States.20028:101Evaluation
[27]David Fielding and Kalvinder Shields. Regional Asymmetries in the Impact ofMonetary Policy Shocks on Prices:Evidence from US Cities. Empirica (2007)34:411-425
[28]Elboune A, De Haan J. Asymetric monetary transmission in EMU:the robustness of VAR conclusion and Cecchetti's legal family theory.CESifo working paper,2004,No.l327
[29]Edgar Ghossoub, Robert R. Reed III. Liquidity risk, economic development, and the effects of monetary policy. European Economic Review54(2010)252-268
[30]Fleming, Marcus J, On exchange rate unification, Economic Journal (81):467-488;
[31]Epstein, Larry C, and Zin, Stanley E. Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns:A Theoretical Framework. Econometrica.1989 46(July):937-969.
[32]European Central Bank. EU Banking Structures. Frankfurt,2005.
[33]Friedman,M. The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review1968, pp.1-17.
[34]Friedman, M. Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press,1953
[35]Fleming, J. On Exchange Rate Unification. The Economic Journal,1971,Vo.l81,pp.467-488
[36]Gaiottti and Andrea Generale.Does Monetary Policy Have Asymmetric Effeets? A Look at the Investment Decisions of Malian Firms.
[37]Georgopoulos, George. Measuring Regional Effects of Monetary Policy in Canada.
[38]Gertler, M. and Gilchrist, S. the Role of Credit Chan-nel of Monetary Transmission Mechanism; Arguments and Evidence.The Scandinavia Journal of Eco-nomics,1993,95(1):43-64.
[39]Giavcinto V. Differential regional effects of monetary policy:a geographical SVAR approach. Bancad' Italia Working Paper,2002(5).
[40]George Georgopoulos, Walid Hejazi. Financial structure and the heterogeneous impact of monetary policy across industries. Journal of Economics and Business61(2009)1-33
[41]Giorgio E. Primiceri. Time Varying Structural Vector Autoregressions and Monetary Policy. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.72, No.3(Jul,2005), pp.821-852
[42]Glenn D. Rudebusch. A Macro-Finance Model of the Term Structure, Monetary Policy, and the Economy. FRBSF Working2003(17).
[43]George Georgopoulos. Measuring Regional Effects of Monetary Policy in Canada. International Advances in Economic Research,2001(7).
[44]Hanna Putkuri.Cross-Country Asymmetries in Euro Area Monetary Transmission:the Role of National Financial Systems. Bank of Finland Discussion Paper.2003(15).
[45]Horvath, m. Empirical evidence on common money and uncommon regions in the US,1998paper presented at zei-conference."common money, uncommon regions". Bonn.
[46]Harberler, Gottfried. The International Monetary System:Some Recent Developments andDiscussions, edited by RobertA. Mundel1&Alexander K. Swoboda,1969(University of Chicago Press).
[47]Ingram, J. C. A proposal for integration in the Atlantic Community, in:Factors Affecting the UnitedStates Balance of Payments, Compilation of Studies Prepared for the Subcommittee on International Exchangeand Payments of the Joint Economic Committee of the Congress,1962, PP.175-207; Washington, D. C.:U. S.Government Printing Office.
[48]Ivo J. M. Arnold, Evert B. Vrugt. Firm Size, Industry Mix and the Regional Transmission of Monetary Policy in Germany.German Economic Review,2002,(5):35—42.
[49]Ira O. Scott, Jr. The Regional Impact of Monetary Policy, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1955,Vol.5,PP269-284.
[50]Ivo J. M. Arnold and Evert B. Vrugt. Firm Size, Industry Mix and the Regional Transmission of Monetary Policy in Germany. German Economic Review5(1):35-59
[51]King, M., The Transmission Mechanism of Monetary Policy, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin,1994, Vol.8,PP61-67.
[52]Lixin SUN, J.L. Ford, David G. Dickson. Bank loans and the effects of monetary policy in China:VAR/VECM approach. China Economic Review21(2010)65-97
[53]Laura Bottazzi and Paolo Manasse. Asymmetric Information and Monetary Policy in Common Currency Areas. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.37, No.4(Aug.,2005), pp.603-621
[54]Leonardo Gambacorta. Inside the bank lending channel. European Economic Review, Volume49, Issue7, October2005, Pages1737-1759.
[55]Luca Dedola, Francesco Lippi. The monetary transmission mechanism:Evidence from the industries of five DECD countries. European Economic Review,Volume49, Issue6, August2005, Pages1543—1569.
[56]Mundell Robert, A theory of optimum currency areas.AmerricanEconomicReview,1961Vol.51,No.4(September):657—665.
[57]Mario Forni, Luca Gambetti. The dynamic effects of monetary policy:A structural factor model approach. Journal of Monetary Economics57(2010)203-216
[58]Michael Ehrmann. Comparing Monetary Policy Transmission across European Countries Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv2000, Vol.136(1)
[59]Natalia Andries, Steve Billon. The effect of bank ownership and deposit insurance on monetary policy transmission. Journal of Banking&Finance34(2010)3050-3054
[60]Owyang, Michael T. and Wall, Howard J.Regonal VARs and the Channel of Monetary Policy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working paper,2006.
[61]Owyang, Michael T. and Wall, Howard J. Structural Breaks and Regional Disparities in the Transmission of Monetary Policy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working paper,2003.
[62]Owyang, M. T. and H. J. Wall. Structural Breaks and Regional Disparitiesin the Transmission of Monetary Policy". Working paper series, Working Paper2003-008B; Federal Reserve Bank of st. Louis:http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2003/2003-008.
[63]Peter Kenen. The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas:An Eclectic View, Monetary Problems of theInternational Economy,1969, pp.41-60.
[64]Peter van Els, Alberto Locarno, Benoit Mojon, Julian Morgan. New Macroeconomic Evidence on Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area. Source:Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol.1, No.2/3, Papers and Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Congress of the European Economic Association (Apr.-May,2003), pp.720-730
[65]Philipp Engler AE Terhi Jokipii AE Christian Merkl. The effect of capital requirement regulation on the transmission of monetary policy:evidence from Austria. Empirica (2007)34:411-425
[66]Robert Mundell. A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas.American Economics Review,1961,vol.51,pp.657-665.
[67]Ronald Mckinnon.(1963). Optimum Currency Areas, American Economic Review, vol.53.
[68]Reginald Darius. The macroeconomic effects of monetary and fiscal policy in a small open economy:Does the exchange rateregime matter?. Journal of International Money and Finance29(2010)1508-1528
[69]Sheila C Dow and Alberto Montagnoli. The Regional Transmission of UK Monetary Policy. Regional Studies,2005,2
[70]Sarantis Kalyvitisa,*, Ifigeneia Skotidab. Some empirical evidence on the effects of U.S. monetary policy shocks on cross exchange rates. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance50(2010)386-394
[71]Sylvia Kaufmann. Is there an asymmetric eoect of monetary policy over time? A Bayesian analysis using Austrian data. Empirical Economics (2002)27:277-297
[72]Tena J. Dios, A. Tremayna. Modeling monetary UK manufacturing industry.Universidad Carlos III de Madrid06-29(11). transmission in Working paper
[73]Toal, William D.(1977). Regional Impacts of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in the Postwar Period:Some Initial Tests. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, WorkingPaper.
[74]Sellon, Gordon H. Jr. The changing U. S. financial system:some implications for the monetary transmission mechanism. Economic Review (QI),2002pp.5-35.
[75]Valter Di Giacinto. Differential Regional Effects of Monetary Policy:A Geographical SVAR Approach. International Regional Science Review200326:313
[76]Yang, Z. and B. Turner. Regional Effects of Monetary Policy in the Property Market. Paper to be presented at the ENHR Conference July2nd—6th2004, Cambridge, UK.
[77]Zhang, Z. accession countries and the Konstanz. Asymmetries in monetary transmission channels between the EMU countries. Seminar:2005,International Monetary Integration.