基于可持续发展的排污权交易有效性研究
|
摘要
可持续发展己经成为世界各国的共识,如何将“持续发展”的理念渗透到环境管理的策略和政策中,如何在环境政策中更多地发挥市场经济的杠杆作用,也是成为各国环境管理者关注的重要问题。排污权交易就是一种新的环境污染控制手段,其因在经济上的收益和管理上的改善己越来越引起人们的重视。从总体情况看,我国排污权交易研究尚处于探索阶段。因此,迫切需要对这一措施进行研究,以促进总量控制目标的实现和环境质量的改善。
本文在总结部分国家排污权交易实践经验的基础上,运用可持续发展理论观点,采用新制度经济学分析方法,结合我国电力工业二氧化硫(SO_2)污染物排放的实际案例,对基于可持续发展的排污权交易有效性进行了较为深入的分析和研究。本文的主要内容包括:
1、以新制度经济学的产权理论和交易理论为分析工具,对建立排污权交易和可持续发展的理论基础及其经济意义进行了理论分析。
2、对部分国家进行排污权交易的重要实践和相关经验进行了总结和分析。重点对美国的排污权交易实践的发展过程、实践效果、经验与教训等进行了认真的分析,并通过对美国、欧盟与日本等相关情况的对比分析,提出了中国实现SO_2达标排放的思路。
3、从可持续发展理论观点出发,对排污权交易的有效性进行了分析,对建立排污权交易有效性评价方法和体系提出了探索性意见。
4、根据国际经验和排污权交易的控制减排潜力,提出了建立中国电力工业SO_2排污权交易市场的建议。对建立市场的必要性和可行性进行了较全面的分析,对该市场的有效创建提出了相关应用模型。
5、以中国电力工业SO_2污染物排放控制为例,验证了上述理论逻辑和相关观点的正确性。
中国刚刚开始尝试推行排污权交易政策,但尚未在全国范围推行这项政策。本文的研究旨在为建立排污权交易制度有效性评价提供思路,期望能对我国排污权交易制度的建设有所裨益。
Sustainable development has become the consensus of all countries in the world, how to infiltrate the concept of "sustainable development" into environmental management strategy and policy, how to play the leverage of a market economy in environmental policy further, also become important issues of concern for the environmental managers. Emission trading is a new way of pollution control, and it has caused more and more attention for the result of the economic gains and improvements in management. In general, the study of China's emissions trading is still at the exploratory stage. Therefore, it’s an urgent need to conduct a study on the measures to promote the goal of total control and environmental quality improvements.
Based on both the emission trading experiences and lessons of some countries and the examples of the sulfur dioxide emission in the Power Industry of China, this paper employs the theory of sustainable development and the mew institutional economics to attempt an in-depth analsis sustainable development potentials of the emission trading scheme. Major analysises in this dissertation are as follows:
1. Use the Property Right Theory and the Trading Theory of the New Institutional Economics as tools to analyze the theoretical basis and economic importance of sustainable development and the establishment of emission trading scheme.
2. Summarize and analyze the relevant emission trading experience and lessons in some countries. It especially focuses on the emission trading practice, and its development, consequences and experience and lessons in the USA. It also compares the relevant practice in the USA, Europe and Japan, and proposes the solutions for the SO_2 emission trading in China.
3. Based on the theory of sustainable development, analyze the validity of the emission trading; propose some exploring idea to establish the evaluation system of the validity of emission trading.
4. Based on the international experience and the potential of emission controlling, propose the methods and solutions to set up the SO_2 emission trading scheme of China’s Power Industry. It also analyzes the necessity and feasibility and proposes some model to set up the trading scheme.
5. Use some SO_2 emission control cases in China’s Power Industry to verify the correctness of my aforementioned theories and views.
China has just begun to try to implement emissions trading policy, but there is no implementation of this policy throughout the country. The purpose of this paper is to offer idea in setting up Chinese evaluation rules about emissions trading, and do some help in constructing Chinese emissions trading policy.
本文在总结部分国家排污权交易实践经验的基础上,运用可持续发展理论观点,采用新制度经济学分析方法,结合我国电力工业二氧化硫(SO_2)污染物排放的实际案例,对基于可持续发展的排污权交易有效性进行了较为深入的分析和研究。本文的主要内容包括:
1、以新制度经济学的产权理论和交易理论为分析工具,对建立排污权交易和可持续发展的理论基础及其经济意义进行了理论分析。
2、对部分国家进行排污权交易的重要实践和相关经验进行了总结和分析。重点对美国的排污权交易实践的发展过程、实践效果、经验与教训等进行了认真的分析,并通过对美国、欧盟与日本等相关情况的对比分析,提出了中国实现SO_2达标排放的思路。
3、从可持续发展理论观点出发,对排污权交易的有效性进行了分析,对建立排污权交易有效性评价方法和体系提出了探索性意见。
4、根据国际经验和排污权交易的控制减排潜力,提出了建立中国电力工业SO_2排污权交易市场的建议。对建立市场的必要性和可行性进行了较全面的分析,对该市场的有效创建提出了相关应用模型。
5、以中国电力工业SO_2污染物排放控制为例,验证了上述理论逻辑和相关观点的正确性。
中国刚刚开始尝试推行排污权交易政策,但尚未在全国范围推行这项政策。本文的研究旨在为建立排污权交易制度有效性评价提供思路,期望能对我国排污权交易制度的建设有所裨益。
Sustainable development has become the consensus of all countries in the world, how to infiltrate the concept of "sustainable development" into environmental management strategy and policy, how to play the leverage of a market economy in environmental policy further, also become important issues of concern for the environmental managers. Emission trading is a new way of pollution control, and it has caused more and more attention for the result of the economic gains and improvements in management. In general, the study of China's emissions trading is still at the exploratory stage. Therefore, it’s an urgent need to conduct a study on the measures to promote the goal of total control and environmental quality improvements.
Based on both the emission trading experiences and lessons of some countries and the examples of the sulfur dioxide emission in the Power Industry of China, this paper employs the theory of sustainable development and the mew institutional economics to attempt an in-depth analsis sustainable development potentials of the emission trading scheme. Major analysises in this dissertation are as follows:
1. Use the Property Right Theory and the Trading Theory of the New Institutional Economics as tools to analyze the theoretical basis and economic importance of sustainable development and the establishment of emission trading scheme.
2. Summarize and analyze the relevant emission trading experience and lessons in some countries. It especially focuses on the emission trading practice, and its development, consequences and experience and lessons in the USA. It also compares the relevant practice in the USA, Europe and Japan, and proposes the solutions for the SO_2 emission trading in China.
3. Based on the theory of sustainable development, analyze the validity of the emission trading; propose some exploring idea to establish the evaluation system of the validity of emission trading.
4. Based on the international experience and the potential of emission controlling, propose the methods and solutions to set up the SO_2 emission trading scheme of China’s Power Industry. It also analyzes the necessity and feasibility and proposes some model to set up the trading scheme.
5. Use some SO_2 emission control cases in China’s Power Industry to verify the correctness of my aforementioned theories and views.
China has just begun to try to implement emissions trading policy, but there is no implementation of this policy throughout the country. The purpose of this paper is to offer idea in setting up Chinese evaluation rules about emissions trading, and do some help in constructing Chinese emissions trading policy.
引文
[1]杨展里,中国排污权交易的可行性研究,环境保护,2001(4):31-32
[2]张象枢等,环境经济学,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994
[3]厉以宁,章铮,环境经济学,北京:中国计划出版社,1995,157-158
[4]张强,过孝民等.中国主要工业废水排放行业的污染特征与行业治理重点,环境保护,2003(10):39-43
[5]王金南,陆新元,杨金田,中国与OECD的环境经济政策,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997
[6]国家环保总局,2002年中国环境状况公报,环境保护,2003(7):3-8
[7]刘长海,张明顺等,环境管理,北京:中国环境科学出版社,2000
[8]国家环保总局行政体制与人事司,环境管理基础教程,国家环保总局行政体制与人事司,2002,14-17
[9]马中,Danduk.论总量控制与排污权交易,中国环境科学,2002,22 (1): 89-92
[10]孙强,环境经济学概论,北京:中国建材工业出版社,2005
[11]王玉庆,环境经济学,北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002
[12]罗勇,曾小飞,环境保护的经济手段,北京:北京大学出版社,2002
[13]杜丽,排污权交易制度及其在我国实施的必要性和可行性研究,中国人口资源与环境,2002(5):45-46
[14]宋国君,总量控制与排污权交易,上海环境科学,2000,19(4):146-148
[15]安德森等,改善环境的经济动力,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1989
[16]郑秉文,外部性的内在化,管理世界,1992,(5):11-13
[17]吴健,排污权交易——环境容量管理制度创新,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005
[18]张承中,环境管理的原理和方法,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997
[19]宋国君,排污权交易,北京:化学工业出版社,2004
[20]国家环保总局科技标准司,市场经济与环境保护,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999
[21]仇伟光,污染物排放总量控制和排污权交易对清洁生产的促进作用,环境保护科学,2004(12):24-26
[22]王蓉,污染预防的内在动因及制度创新的经济分析,环境保护,2003(2):15-17
[23]陈宗团,徐琳瑜等,城市环境管理经济方法——设计与实施,北京:化学工业出版社,2003
[24]姚建等,环境经济学,成都:西南财经大学出版社,2001
[25]贺永顺,关于排污权交易的若干探讨,上海环境科学,1997,(7):302-303
[26]刘亚明,经济合作与发展组织环境经济手段应用指导,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994
[27]段文斌,陈国富,制度经济学——制度主义与经济分析,天津:南开大学出版社,2003
[28]肖江文,罗云峰,排污权交易制度与初始排污权分配,科技进步与对策,2002(1):126-127
[29] Robert S.Pindyck,Daniel L.Rubinfeld. Microeconomics,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[30] Tom Titenburg, 2000. The Tradable Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: What Have We Learned. http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten
[31]杜丹德,总量控制与排污权交易,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999
[32]张晓,中国环境政策的总体评价,中国社会科学,1999(3):88-99
[33]王伯安,吴海燕,治理环境污染的经济制度安排,经济问题,2001(6):45-47
[34]高鸿业,冯金华等,西方经济学,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002
[35]威廉姆森,治理机制,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001:52
[36] Robert S.Pindyck,Daniel L.Rubinfeld. Microeconomics,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[37] Tom Tietenberg, Empowering The Community: Information Strategies For Pollution Control. http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten
[38]李柞泳,汪嘉杨,可持续发展评价模型与应用,北京:科学出版社,2006
[39]严岩,论环境保护与可持续发展,山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,(8):31
[40]郑元,张天柱,从理论到实践的美国排污权交易,上海环境科学,2000,19(11):505-507
[41]徐家良,范笑仙,制度安排、制度变迁与政府管理限度——对排污许可证制度演变过程的分析,上海社会科学院学术季刊,2002(1):13-20
[42]寇宝莲,环保产业发展的挑战与机遇,污染防治技术,2003(9):95-96
[43]杜莉,李华,典型环境政策的经济分析及中国的政策选择,经济问题,2001(11):18-19
[44] Tom Titenburg, 2000. The Tradable Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons.http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten:21-23
[45] Tom Titenburg, 1999. Tradable Permit Approaches to Pollution Control:.http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten: 11-15
[46]罗吉等,走向21世纪——中国青年环境论坛首届学术年会论文集,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1993
[47] Catherine L. Kling, Jinhua Zhao, On the long-run efficiency of auctioned vs.free permits, Economics Letters, 2000(69)
[48]张维迎,博弈论与信息经济学,上海:上海人民出版社,2003
[49]肖江文,罗云峰等,排污申报机制设计的博弈分析,系统工程理论与实践,2002(11):23-27
[50]刘风启,污染物排放总量控制计划,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1996
[51]林丰,陆小杰等,建立科学的排污申报登记系统,污染防治技术,2003(3):87-91
[52] Zhang Ying, Wang Yong. The Economic Analysis of Emission Rights Trading in China.The 5th International Conference on Management(ICM 2004,Macao),May.3rd, 2004
[53] Uwe Schubert,Andreas Zerlauth,Innovative Regional Environmental Policy-the Reclaim-Emission Trading Policy,Environmental Management and Health, No.3,Vol10,1999.
[54]刘冉,试论排污权交易会计核算的可行性,财会研究,2002(2):49-50
[55]钱进,李耘等,运用现代化监控网络提高环境监察效能,污染防治技术,2003(9):86
[56]新元,排污收费制度,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994
[57]顾春铵,关于激励公众参与环保的对策,污染防治技术,2003(9):97-98
[58]祝兴祥等,中国排污许可证制度,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1991
[59]马中,环境与资源经济学概论,北京:高等教育出版社,2001
[60]胡平生,袁磊,对排污权交易理论的反思,当代财经,1998(5):26-28
[61]吴建,马中,科斯定理对排污权交易政策的理论贡献,厦门大学学报,2003(3):21-25
[62]汪毅,王娟等,环境工程建设的国际和民间融资模式分析,环境保护,2003(3):57-61
[63]张曼,屠梅曾,排污权交易制度在中国的应用探析,科学.经济.社会,2002(4):41-45
[64] Emilio Padilla, Jordi Roca. The proposals for a European tax on CO and their implications for intercountry distribution, Environmental and Resource Economics, 2004,27: 273-295 2
[65] A.B Jaffe, R.N Stavins. Dynamic incentives of environmental regulation: the effects ofalternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 29(3): 43-63
[66] Rose,B.Steven, J.Edmonds, M.Wise.International equity and differentiation in global warming policy: an application to tradable emission permits. Environmental and Resources Economics, 1998, 12: 25-51
[67]万威武,交易成本与排污权交易体系的设计,中国软科学,2002(7):115-118
[68] Juan-Yablo Montero. Market structure and environmental innovation. Journal of Applied Economics, 2002,5: 293-325
[69] William J.Baumol, Wallace E.Oates.环境经济理论与政策设计,北京:经济科学出版社,2003
[70]李华,杜莉,美国的排污权交易及其对我国的启示,世界经济文汇,2001(6):19-22
[71]区平格,能源环境可持续发展研究,北京:中国环境科学出版社,2003
[72] KostantinosDPatlitzianas, ArgyrisGKagiannas, JohnPsarras.欧洲的环境政策.能源与环境,2004(1):32-35.
[73] Sven Bode. Abatement cost vs. compliance in multi-period emissions trading—the firm’s perspective. HWWA discussion paper230, 2003.
[74] Katrin Rehdanz, Richard S.J.Tol. On multi-period allocation of tradable emission permits[D]. working paperFUN-43. 2004
[75] Sven Bode. Multi-period emission trading in the electricity sector—winners and losers. Energy policy, 2004: 680-691.
[76]陈德湖,排污权交易理论及其研究综述,外国经济与管理,2004(5):45-49
[77] Bernsten,Jan.D. Alternative Approaches to Pollution Control and Waste Management Regulatory and Economic Instrument, the World Bank, 1993
[78] B?hringer, C. and Lange, A. (2003) On the Design of Optimal Grandfathering Schemes for Emission Allowances. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03-08.
[79] Burtraw, D., Palmer, K., Bharvirkar, R. and Paul, A. (2002) The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances. The Electricity Journal 15 (5) 51-62.
[80] Tom Titenburg, 1999. Tradable Permit Approaches to Pollution Control.http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten: 2-7
[81]刘绍,叶琳等,广州市实施二氧化硫排污权交易研究,环境科学与管理,2005(12) :12-15
[82]陈德胡,李寿德等,排污权交易市场中的厂商行为与政府管制,系统工程,2004(3):44-46
[83]杜纲,管理数学基础—理论与应用,天津:天津大学出版社,2003
[84] Saaty T L. Multicriteria Decision Making. RWS Publications. Pittsburgh, PA, 1990
[85] Saaty TL. Multicriteria Decision Making. Inner and outer Dependence in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: The Supermatrix and Superhierarchy. Proceeding of the 2nd ISAHP. Pittsburgh, 1991
[86] Saaty T L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996
[87] Rozann W. Saaty .Validation examples for the Analytic Hierachy Process and Analytic Network Process MCDM 2004, Whistler, B. C. Canada August 6-11, 2004
[88]武华光,贾继文,胡继连,排污权交易的基本原理与现实应用,山东社会科学,2002(6):40-43
[89]张颖,王勇,我国排污权交易制度的应用研究,中南大学学报(社会科学版)2004(4):464-468
[90]邵亦慧,美国环境管理的发展动向,上海环境科学,2003(2):13-22
[91]李寿德,排污权交易的条件功能与存在的问题探析,科研管理,2003(6):21-26
[92]张联,张玉军,欧洲等国环保行政管理体制,世界环境,2002(5):43-45
[93]袁江,赵有声,排污权交易制度以及在我国的应用展望,决策咨询,2005(3):29-30
[94]匡寻,丁桑岚,电力行业实行二氧化硫浅析,中国环保产业,2006(8):12-15
[95]刘绍,叶琳,游江峰,广州市实施二氧化硫排污权交易研究,环境科学与管理,2005(12):12-15
[96]朱法华,王圣,SO排放指标分配方法研究及在我国的实践,环境科学研究,2005(4):36-41 2
[97] Daniel J.Dudek,王昊,张建宇,SO排污权交易在中国的发展与挑战,电力环境保护,2007(2):1-5 2
[98]郑元,张天柱,从理论到实践的美国排污交易,上海环境科学2000(11),505-507
[99]李巍,毛渭锋,大同市二氧化硫初始排污权分配研究,环境科学与技术,2005(4):58-60
[100]任玉珑,刘刚刚,发电企业实施排污权交易初探,重庆大学学报,2003(11):134-137
[101]魏琦,控制火电厂二氧化硫排放的有效途径—排污权交易,生态经济,2004(6):283-286
[102]蓝虹,环境产权经济学,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005,219
[103]胡民,基于交易成本理论的排污权交易市场运行机制分析,理论探讨,2006(5):83-85
[104]吴健,排污权交易—环境容量管理制度创新,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005
[105]王志轩,潘荔,彭俊,电力行业二氧化硫排放控制现状、费用及对策分析环境科学研究,2005(4):11-20
[106]钱水苗,论政府在排污权交易市场中的职能定位,中州学刊,2005(3):87-90
[107]陈侠,刘燕,马静;排污权交易在电力行业的应用探讨,粉煤灰综合利用,2006(3):31-32
[108]袁江,赵有声,排污权交易制度及其对燃煤电厂污染排放的影响,粉煤灰综合利用,2005(3):6-9
[109]李敦瑞,王绪龙,王代敬,排污权交易制度资源配置功能分析及政策设计,科技进步与对策,2006(2):61-62
[110]王学山,虞孝感,王玉秀,区域排污权交易模型研究,中国人口资源与环境,2005(6):62-65
[111]钱谊,周军英,运用市场机制控制大气污染——美国酸雨进化中的二氧化硫排放交易系统,农业环境保护,2001,(6):465-467
[112]赵贺,排污权交易的理论与实践——结合上海排放权交易,上海综合经济,2002,(11):10-11
[113]胡洁,王玮,我国火电厂SO污染治理政策的理论分析,工业安全与环保,2005(1):31-32 2
[114] Daniel J.Dudek,秦虎,张建宇,以SO排放控制和排污权交易为例分析中国环境执政能力,环境科学研究,2006(19):44-58 2
[115] Boemare C. Quirion P. Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe, lessons from economic literature and international experiences. Ecological Economics, 2002, 43:213-230
[116] Milliman S R, PrinceR. Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1989, 17:247-265
[117] Jensen J, Rasmussen T N. Allocation of CO Emission Permits: a General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy Instruments. Journal of Environmental Economics, 2000, 40(2):111-136 2
[118] Kling C L, Zhao J H .On the long-run efficiency of auctioned vs. free permits. Economics Leters, 2000, 69 (2):235-238
[119] EdwardsT H, Huton J P. Allocation of carbon permits within a country: a general equilibrium analysis of the United Kingdom. Energy Economics, 2001, 23:371-386
[120] Innes R. Stochastic pollution, costly sanctions, and optimality of emission permit banking. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 45:546-568
[121] Phaneuf D.J, Requate T. Incentives for investment in advanced pollution abatement technology in emission permit markets with banking. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 22: 369-390
[122] Unger T, Ekvall T. Benefits from increased cooperation and energy trade under CO commitments—The Nordic case. Climate Policy, 2003, 3:279-294 2
[123] Leimbach M.Equity and carbon emissions trading: a model analysis, Energy Policy, 2003, 31:1033-1044
[124] Luter R, Shogren J F. Tradable permit tariffs: How local air pollution affects carbon emissions permit trading. Land Economics, 2002, 78 (2):159
[125] Viguier L. Fair trade and harmonization of climate change policies in Europe. Energy Policy, 2001, 29: 749-753
[126] Tietenberg T.Ethical in flucences on the evolution of the US tradable permit approach to air pollution control. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24 (2-3): 241-257
[127] Svendsen G T, Vesterdal M.How to design green house gas trading in the EU? Energy Policy, 2003, 31: 1531-1539
[128] Pezzey J C V. Emission Taxes and Tradeable Permits: A Comparison of Views on Long-Run Efficiency. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003,26 (2): 329
[129] Jensen S C, Skytte K. Simultaneous attainment of energy goals by means of green certificates and emission permits. Energy Policy, 2003, 31: 63 -71
[130] Ahlhcim M, Schneider F. Allowing for Household Preferences in Emission Trading: A Contribution to the Climate Policy Debate. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 21: 317-432
[131] Martin R S. Marketable emission permits with imperfect monitoring. Energy Policy, 2003, 31: 1369-1378
[132] John K Stranlund, Carlos A Chavez, Barry C Field. Enforcing emissions trading programs: Theory, practice, and performance. Policy Studies Journal, 2002,30(3): 343-362
[133] Barry O.Solomom. New directions in emissions trading: the potential contribution of New Institutiona1 Economics. Ecological Economics.1999,30: 371 -387
[134] Robert N Stavins. Pollution for sale. eissions Trading and Joint Implementation. Environment Washington, 2000,42(3): 45-46
[135] Smale, R. Hartley, M. Hepburn. The impact of CO emissions trading on firm profits and market prices. Climate Policy, 2006, 6 (1): 31–48 2
[136] Sijm, J.P.M., Neuhoff. CO cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy , 2006, 6(1): 49-72 2
[137] Neuhoff, K. Keats, K. Sato. Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocation to the electricity sector. Climate Policy, 2006, 6 (1): 73–91
[138] Gielen, D.Moriguchi. CO in the iron and steel industry: an analysis of Japanese emission reduction potentials. Energy Policy, 2002, 30: 849–863 2
[139] Dobos. The effects of emission trading on production and inventories in the Arrow–Karlin model. International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 5: 301–308
[140] Holtsmark, B. Mastad. Emission trading under the Kyoto Protocol—effects on fossil fuel markets under alternative regimes. Energy Policy, 2002, 30: 207–218
[141] Springer, U. Varilek. Estimating the price of tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions in 2008–2012. Energy Policy, 2004, 32: 611–621
[142] Zhao, J. Irreversible abatement investment under cost uncertainties: tradable emission permits and emissions charges. Journal of Public Economics, 2003, 87: 2765–2789
[143] Beckerman W., Pasek, J. The equitable international allocation of tradable carbon emission permits. Global Environmental Change 1995, 5: 405–413
[144] Elzen den M., Lucas, P., Vuuren van, D. Abatement costs of post-Kyoto regimes. Energy Policy, 2005 33: 2138–2151
[145] Gupta, S., Bhandari P.M. An effective allocation criterion for CO emissions. Energy Policy,1999, 27: 727–736 2
[146] Neumayer, E. In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 185-192
[147] Philibert, C. How could emissions trading benefit developing countries. Energy Policy, 2000, 28: 947-956
[148] Winkler, H., Spalding-Fecher, R., Tyani, L. Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes. Climate Policy, 2002, 2: 303-318
[149] Atkinson, S.E., Tietenberg, T.H. Market failure in incentive-based regulation: the case of emissions trading. Environment Economics Management, 1991, 21 (1): 17-31
[150] Bohi, D.R., Burtraw, D. Utility investment behavior and the emission trading market. Resources Energy, 1992, 14: 129–153
[151] Burtraw, D. The SO emissions trading program: cost savings without allowance trades. Contemp Economics Policy, 1996, 14 (2): 79-94 2
[152] Burtraw, D., Palmer, K., Paul, A., Bharvirkar, R. The effect of asset values of the allowance allocation of carbon dioxide allowances. The Electricity Journal, 2002, 15 (5): 51–62
[153] Woerdman, E. Organizing emissions trading: The barrier of domestic permit allocation. Energy Policy, 2000, 28: 613-623
[154]李寿德,程少川,我国组建排污权交易市场问题研究,中国软科学,2000(8):19-23
[155]赵鹏高,严晨敏等,二氧化硫排放总量控制若干问题思考,电力环境保护,2006(8):1-4
[156]刘兰芬等,大气排污权交易政策及在我国电力行业发展中的应用,电力环境保护,1998,(1):21-26
[157]汤姆.惕藤伯格,环境经济学与政策(第三版),上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003
[158] Stavins, R.N. Market-based environmental policies: what can we learn from US experience (and Related Research)? Resources for the Future, 2003, DP: 3-43
[159] Springer, U.The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: a survey of model studies. Energy Economics, 2003, 25: 527–551
[160]张安华,排污权交易的可持续发展潜力分析,北京:经济科学出版社,2005
[161] Kenneth Arrow, Gretchen Daily etc, Managing Ecosystem Resources. http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten
[162]范华琼,环境保护与排污权交易,上海环境科学,2003,(5):11-13
[163]狄雯华,论排污权交易在中国的可行性,环境保护科学,2004,(2):69-70
[164]丁玉魏,排污权交易的经济优化机制研究,重庆环境科学,2004,(3): 9-11
[165]朱国宏,通向可持续发展的道路,上海:复旦大学出版社,1998
[166]李寿德,仇胜萍,排污权交易思想及其初始分配与定价问题探析,科学学与科学技术管理,2002 (7):1 4-15
[167]坎贝尔.麦克康奈尔,经济学原理.问题与政策,北京:北京大学出版社,2000
[168]哈密尔顿等,里约后五年—环境政策的创新,北京:中国环境出版社,1998
[169] Tao W D et al. Tradable discharge permit system for water pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 15(1): 27
[170] Ermoliev. Y, et al. Markets for tradeable emission and ambient permits: A dynamic approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000, 15(1): 39
[171] Reimund Schwarze et al. Sulfur Allowance Trading and the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market: A Comparative Design Analysis of Two Major Cap-and-Tra1de Permit Programs? Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003, 17: 279-298
[172] Stavins Robert N. What can we learn from the grand policy experiment? Lessons from SO allowance trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, 12: 69-89 2
[173] Godby, R. Market Power in Laboratory Emission Permit Markets. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 23: 279-318
[174] Van Egteren . H, M. Weber. Marketable Permits, Market Power and Cheating. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996, 30: 161-173
[175] Cason, T.N, Gandgadharan L. Transactions Cost in Tradable Permit Markets: An Experimental Study of Pollution Market Designs. Journal of Regulation Economics, 2003, 23(2):145–165
[176] Gangadharan, L. Transaction Costs in Pollution Markets: An Empirical Study. Land Economics, 2000, 76(4): 601-614
[177] Stranlund, J. K. Endogenous Monitoring and Enforcement of a Transferable Emissions Permit System. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1999, 38: 267-282
[178] Speck, S. Energy and carbon taxes and the distributional implications. Energy Policy, 1999, 27: 659–667
[179] Munksgaard, J., Ramskov, J. Effects of internalising external production costs in a North Europe power market. Energy Policy, 2002, 30: 501-510
[180] Hauch, J. Electricity trade and SO emission reductions in the Nordic Countries. Energy Economics, 2002, 25: 509-526 2
[181] Krupnick, Alan, Burtraw, Dallas. The social costs of electricity: do the numbers add up? Resource and Energy Economics, 1996, 18: 423–466
[182] Burtraw, D., Mansur, E. The environmental effects of SO trading and banking. Environmental Science and Technology 1999, 33: 3489–3494 2
[183] Burtraw, D., Krupnick, A., Palmer, K., Paul, A, Toman, M., Bloyd, C. Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the united states from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 45 (3): 650–673
[184] Joskow, P.L., Schmalensee, R., Bailey, E.M. The market for sulfur dioxide emissions. American Economic Review, 1998, 88: 669– 685
[185] Farzin, Y.H., Kort, P.M. Pollution abatement investment when environmental regulation is uncertain.Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2000, 2: 183– 212
[186] Requate, T. Incentives to innovate under emission taxes and tradable permits. European Journal of Political Economy, 1998, 14: 139– 165
[2]张象枢等,环境经济学,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994
[3]厉以宁,章铮,环境经济学,北京:中国计划出版社,1995,157-158
[4]张强,过孝民等.中国主要工业废水排放行业的污染特征与行业治理重点,环境保护,2003(10):39-43
[5]王金南,陆新元,杨金田,中国与OECD的环境经济政策,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997
[6]国家环保总局,2002年中国环境状况公报,环境保护,2003(7):3-8
[7]刘长海,张明顺等,环境管理,北京:中国环境科学出版社,2000
[8]国家环保总局行政体制与人事司,环境管理基础教程,国家环保总局行政体制与人事司,2002,14-17
[9]马中,Danduk.论总量控制与排污权交易,中国环境科学,2002,22 (1): 89-92
[10]孙强,环境经济学概论,北京:中国建材工业出版社,2005
[11]王玉庆,环境经济学,北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002
[12]罗勇,曾小飞,环境保护的经济手段,北京:北京大学出版社,2002
[13]杜丽,排污权交易制度及其在我国实施的必要性和可行性研究,中国人口资源与环境,2002(5):45-46
[14]宋国君,总量控制与排污权交易,上海环境科学,2000,19(4):146-148
[15]安德森等,改善环境的经济动力,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1989
[16]郑秉文,外部性的内在化,管理世界,1992,(5):11-13
[17]吴健,排污权交易——环境容量管理制度创新,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005
[18]张承中,环境管理的原理和方法,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997
[19]宋国君,排污权交易,北京:化学工业出版社,2004
[20]国家环保总局科技标准司,市场经济与环境保护,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999
[21]仇伟光,污染物排放总量控制和排污权交易对清洁生产的促进作用,环境保护科学,2004(12):24-26
[22]王蓉,污染预防的内在动因及制度创新的经济分析,环境保护,2003(2):15-17
[23]陈宗团,徐琳瑜等,城市环境管理经济方法——设计与实施,北京:化学工业出版社,2003
[24]姚建等,环境经济学,成都:西南财经大学出版社,2001
[25]贺永顺,关于排污权交易的若干探讨,上海环境科学,1997,(7):302-303
[26]刘亚明,经济合作与发展组织环境经济手段应用指导,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994
[27]段文斌,陈国富,制度经济学——制度主义与经济分析,天津:南开大学出版社,2003
[28]肖江文,罗云峰,排污权交易制度与初始排污权分配,科技进步与对策,2002(1):126-127
[29] Robert S.Pindyck,Daniel L.Rubinfeld. Microeconomics,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[30] Tom Titenburg, 2000. The Tradable Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: What Have We Learned. http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten
[31]杜丹德,总量控制与排污权交易,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999
[32]张晓,中国环境政策的总体评价,中国社会科学,1999(3):88-99
[33]王伯安,吴海燕,治理环境污染的经济制度安排,经济问题,2001(6):45-47
[34]高鸿业,冯金华等,西方经济学,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002
[35]威廉姆森,治理机制,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001:52
[36] Robert S.Pindyck,Daniel L.Rubinfeld. Microeconomics,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[37] Tom Tietenberg, Empowering The Community: Information Strategies For Pollution Control. http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten
[38]李柞泳,汪嘉杨,可持续发展评价模型与应用,北京:科学出版社,2006
[39]严岩,论环境保护与可持续发展,山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,(8):31
[40]郑元,张天柱,从理论到实践的美国排污权交易,上海环境科学,2000,19(11):505-507
[41]徐家良,范笑仙,制度安排、制度变迁与政府管理限度——对排污许可证制度演变过程的分析,上海社会科学院学术季刊,2002(1):13-20
[42]寇宝莲,环保产业发展的挑战与机遇,污染防治技术,2003(9):95-96
[43]杜莉,李华,典型环境政策的经济分析及中国的政策选择,经济问题,2001(11):18-19
[44] Tom Titenburg, 2000. The Tradable Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons.http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten:21-23
[45] Tom Titenburg, 1999. Tradable Permit Approaches to Pollution Control:.http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten: 11-15
[46]罗吉等,走向21世纪——中国青年环境论坛首届学术年会论文集,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1993
[47] Catherine L. Kling, Jinhua Zhao, On the long-run efficiency of auctioned vs.free permits, Economics Letters, 2000(69)
[48]张维迎,博弈论与信息经济学,上海:上海人民出版社,2003
[49]肖江文,罗云峰等,排污申报机制设计的博弈分析,系统工程理论与实践,2002(11):23-27
[50]刘风启,污染物排放总量控制计划,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1996
[51]林丰,陆小杰等,建立科学的排污申报登记系统,污染防治技术,2003(3):87-91
[52] Zhang Ying, Wang Yong. The Economic Analysis of Emission Rights Trading in China.The 5th International Conference on Management(ICM 2004,Macao),May.3rd, 2004
[53] Uwe Schubert,Andreas Zerlauth,Innovative Regional Environmental Policy-the Reclaim-Emission Trading Policy,Environmental Management and Health, No.3,Vol10,1999.
[54]刘冉,试论排污权交易会计核算的可行性,财会研究,2002(2):49-50
[55]钱进,李耘等,运用现代化监控网络提高环境监察效能,污染防治技术,2003(9):86
[56]新元,排污收费制度,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994
[57]顾春铵,关于激励公众参与环保的对策,污染防治技术,2003(9):97-98
[58]祝兴祥等,中国排污许可证制度,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1991
[59]马中,环境与资源经济学概论,北京:高等教育出版社,2001
[60]胡平生,袁磊,对排污权交易理论的反思,当代财经,1998(5):26-28
[61]吴建,马中,科斯定理对排污权交易政策的理论贡献,厦门大学学报,2003(3):21-25
[62]汪毅,王娟等,环境工程建设的国际和民间融资模式分析,环境保护,2003(3):57-61
[63]张曼,屠梅曾,排污权交易制度在中国的应用探析,科学.经济.社会,2002(4):41-45
[64] Emilio Padilla, Jordi Roca. The proposals for a European tax on CO and their implications for intercountry distribution, Environmental and Resource Economics, 2004,27: 273-295 2
[65] A.B Jaffe, R.N Stavins. Dynamic incentives of environmental regulation: the effects ofalternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 29(3): 43-63
[66] Rose,B.Steven, J.Edmonds, M.Wise.International equity and differentiation in global warming policy: an application to tradable emission permits. Environmental and Resources Economics, 1998, 12: 25-51
[67]万威武,交易成本与排污权交易体系的设计,中国软科学,2002(7):115-118
[68] Juan-Yablo Montero. Market structure and environmental innovation. Journal of Applied Economics, 2002,5: 293-325
[69] William J.Baumol, Wallace E.Oates.环境经济理论与政策设计,北京:经济科学出版社,2003
[70]李华,杜莉,美国的排污权交易及其对我国的启示,世界经济文汇,2001(6):19-22
[71]区平格,能源环境可持续发展研究,北京:中国环境科学出版社,2003
[72] KostantinosDPatlitzianas, ArgyrisGKagiannas, JohnPsarras.欧洲的环境政策.能源与环境,2004(1):32-35.
[73] Sven Bode. Abatement cost vs. compliance in multi-period emissions trading—the firm’s perspective. HWWA discussion paper230, 2003.
[74] Katrin Rehdanz, Richard S.J.Tol. On multi-period allocation of tradable emission permits[D]. working paperFUN-43. 2004
[75] Sven Bode. Multi-period emission trading in the electricity sector—winners and losers. Energy policy, 2004: 680-691.
[76]陈德湖,排污权交易理论及其研究综述,外国经济与管理,2004(5):45-49
[77] Bernsten,Jan.D. Alternative Approaches to Pollution Control and Waste Management Regulatory and Economic Instrument, the World Bank, 1993
[78] B?hringer, C. and Lange, A. (2003) On the Design of Optimal Grandfathering Schemes for Emission Allowances. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03-08.
[79] Burtraw, D., Palmer, K., Bharvirkar, R. and Paul, A. (2002) The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances. The Electricity Journal 15 (5) 51-62.
[80] Tom Titenburg, 1999. Tradable Permit Approaches to Pollution Control.http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten: 2-7
[81]刘绍,叶琳等,广州市实施二氧化硫排污权交易研究,环境科学与管理,2005(12) :12-15
[82]陈德胡,李寿德等,排污权交易市场中的厂商行为与政府管制,系统工程,2004(3):44-46
[83]杜纲,管理数学基础—理论与应用,天津:天津大学出版社,2003
[84] Saaty T L. Multicriteria Decision Making. RWS Publications. Pittsburgh, PA, 1990
[85] Saaty TL. Multicriteria Decision Making. Inner and outer Dependence in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: The Supermatrix and Superhierarchy. Proceeding of the 2nd ISAHP. Pittsburgh, 1991
[86] Saaty T L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996
[87] Rozann W. Saaty .Validation examples for the Analytic Hierachy Process and Analytic Network Process MCDM 2004, Whistler, B. C. Canada August 6-11, 2004
[88]武华光,贾继文,胡继连,排污权交易的基本原理与现实应用,山东社会科学,2002(6):40-43
[89]张颖,王勇,我国排污权交易制度的应用研究,中南大学学报(社会科学版)2004(4):464-468
[90]邵亦慧,美国环境管理的发展动向,上海环境科学,2003(2):13-22
[91]李寿德,排污权交易的条件功能与存在的问题探析,科研管理,2003(6):21-26
[92]张联,张玉军,欧洲等国环保行政管理体制,世界环境,2002(5):43-45
[93]袁江,赵有声,排污权交易制度以及在我国的应用展望,决策咨询,2005(3):29-30
[94]匡寻,丁桑岚,电力行业实行二氧化硫浅析,中国环保产业,2006(8):12-15
[95]刘绍,叶琳,游江峰,广州市实施二氧化硫排污权交易研究,环境科学与管理,2005(12):12-15
[96]朱法华,王圣,SO排放指标分配方法研究及在我国的实践,环境科学研究,2005(4):36-41 2
[97] Daniel J.Dudek,王昊,张建宇,SO排污权交易在中国的发展与挑战,电力环境保护,2007(2):1-5 2
[98]郑元,张天柱,从理论到实践的美国排污交易,上海环境科学2000(11),505-507
[99]李巍,毛渭锋,大同市二氧化硫初始排污权分配研究,环境科学与技术,2005(4):58-60
[100]任玉珑,刘刚刚,发电企业实施排污权交易初探,重庆大学学报,2003(11):134-137
[101]魏琦,控制火电厂二氧化硫排放的有效途径—排污权交易,生态经济,2004(6):283-286
[102]蓝虹,环境产权经济学,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005,219
[103]胡民,基于交易成本理论的排污权交易市场运行机制分析,理论探讨,2006(5):83-85
[104]吴健,排污权交易—环境容量管理制度创新,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005
[105]王志轩,潘荔,彭俊,电力行业二氧化硫排放控制现状、费用及对策分析环境科学研究,2005(4):11-20
[106]钱水苗,论政府在排污权交易市场中的职能定位,中州学刊,2005(3):87-90
[107]陈侠,刘燕,马静;排污权交易在电力行业的应用探讨,粉煤灰综合利用,2006(3):31-32
[108]袁江,赵有声,排污权交易制度及其对燃煤电厂污染排放的影响,粉煤灰综合利用,2005(3):6-9
[109]李敦瑞,王绪龙,王代敬,排污权交易制度资源配置功能分析及政策设计,科技进步与对策,2006(2):61-62
[110]王学山,虞孝感,王玉秀,区域排污权交易模型研究,中国人口资源与环境,2005(6):62-65
[111]钱谊,周军英,运用市场机制控制大气污染——美国酸雨进化中的二氧化硫排放交易系统,农业环境保护,2001,(6):465-467
[112]赵贺,排污权交易的理论与实践——结合上海排放权交易,上海综合经济,2002,(11):10-11
[113]胡洁,王玮,我国火电厂SO污染治理政策的理论分析,工业安全与环保,2005(1):31-32 2
[114] Daniel J.Dudek,秦虎,张建宇,以SO排放控制和排污权交易为例分析中国环境执政能力,环境科学研究,2006(19):44-58 2
[115] Boemare C. Quirion P. Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe, lessons from economic literature and international experiences. Ecological Economics, 2002, 43:213-230
[116] Milliman S R, PrinceR. Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1989, 17:247-265
[117] Jensen J, Rasmussen T N. Allocation of CO Emission Permits: a General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy Instruments. Journal of Environmental Economics, 2000, 40(2):111-136 2
[118] Kling C L, Zhao J H .On the long-run efficiency of auctioned vs. free permits. Economics Leters, 2000, 69 (2):235-238
[119] EdwardsT H, Huton J P. Allocation of carbon permits within a country: a general equilibrium analysis of the United Kingdom. Energy Economics, 2001, 23:371-386
[120] Innes R. Stochastic pollution, costly sanctions, and optimality of emission permit banking. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 45:546-568
[121] Phaneuf D.J, Requate T. Incentives for investment in advanced pollution abatement technology in emission permit markets with banking. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 22: 369-390
[122] Unger T, Ekvall T. Benefits from increased cooperation and energy trade under CO commitments—The Nordic case. Climate Policy, 2003, 3:279-294 2
[123] Leimbach M.Equity and carbon emissions trading: a model analysis, Energy Policy, 2003, 31:1033-1044
[124] Luter R, Shogren J F. Tradable permit tariffs: How local air pollution affects carbon emissions permit trading. Land Economics, 2002, 78 (2):159
[125] Viguier L. Fair trade and harmonization of climate change policies in Europe. Energy Policy, 2001, 29: 749-753
[126] Tietenberg T.Ethical in flucences on the evolution of the US tradable permit approach to air pollution control. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24 (2-3): 241-257
[127] Svendsen G T, Vesterdal M.How to design green house gas trading in the EU? Energy Policy, 2003, 31: 1531-1539
[128] Pezzey J C V. Emission Taxes and Tradeable Permits: A Comparison of Views on Long-Run Efficiency. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003,26 (2): 329
[129] Jensen S C, Skytte K. Simultaneous attainment of energy goals by means of green certificates and emission permits. Energy Policy, 2003, 31: 63 -71
[130] Ahlhcim M, Schneider F. Allowing for Household Preferences in Emission Trading: A Contribution to the Climate Policy Debate. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 21: 317-432
[131] Martin R S. Marketable emission permits with imperfect monitoring. Energy Policy, 2003, 31: 1369-1378
[132] John K Stranlund, Carlos A Chavez, Barry C Field. Enforcing emissions trading programs: Theory, practice, and performance. Policy Studies Journal, 2002,30(3): 343-362
[133] Barry O.Solomom. New directions in emissions trading: the potential contribution of New Institutiona1 Economics. Ecological Economics.1999,30: 371 -387
[134] Robert N Stavins. Pollution for sale. eissions Trading and Joint Implementation. Environment Washington, 2000,42(3): 45-46
[135] Smale, R. Hartley, M. Hepburn. The impact of CO emissions trading on firm profits and market prices. Climate Policy, 2006, 6 (1): 31–48 2
[136] Sijm, J.P.M., Neuhoff. CO cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy , 2006, 6(1): 49-72 2
[137] Neuhoff, K. Keats, K. Sato. Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocation to the electricity sector. Climate Policy, 2006, 6 (1): 73–91
[138] Gielen, D.Moriguchi. CO in the iron and steel industry: an analysis of Japanese emission reduction potentials. Energy Policy, 2002, 30: 849–863 2
[139] Dobos. The effects of emission trading on production and inventories in the Arrow–Karlin model. International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 5: 301–308
[140] Holtsmark, B. Mastad. Emission trading under the Kyoto Protocol—effects on fossil fuel markets under alternative regimes. Energy Policy, 2002, 30: 207–218
[141] Springer, U. Varilek. Estimating the price of tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions in 2008–2012. Energy Policy, 2004, 32: 611–621
[142] Zhao, J. Irreversible abatement investment under cost uncertainties: tradable emission permits and emissions charges. Journal of Public Economics, 2003, 87: 2765–2789
[143] Beckerman W., Pasek, J. The equitable international allocation of tradable carbon emission permits. Global Environmental Change 1995, 5: 405–413
[144] Elzen den M., Lucas, P., Vuuren van, D. Abatement costs of post-Kyoto regimes. Energy Policy, 2005 33: 2138–2151
[145] Gupta, S., Bhandari P.M. An effective allocation criterion for CO emissions. Energy Policy,1999, 27: 727–736 2
[146] Neumayer, E. In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 185-192
[147] Philibert, C. How could emissions trading benefit developing countries. Energy Policy, 2000, 28: 947-956
[148] Winkler, H., Spalding-Fecher, R., Tyani, L. Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes. Climate Policy, 2002, 2: 303-318
[149] Atkinson, S.E., Tietenberg, T.H. Market failure in incentive-based regulation: the case of emissions trading. Environment Economics Management, 1991, 21 (1): 17-31
[150] Bohi, D.R., Burtraw, D. Utility investment behavior and the emission trading market. Resources Energy, 1992, 14: 129–153
[151] Burtraw, D. The SO emissions trading program: cost savings without allowance trades. Contemp Economics Policy, 1996, 14 (2): 79-94 2
[152] Burtraw, D., Palmer, K., Paul, A., Bharvirkar, R. The effect of asset values of the allowance allocation of carbon dioxide allowances. The Electricity Journal, 2002, 15 (5): 51–62
[153] Woerdman, E. Organizing emissions trading: The barrier of domestic permit allocation. Energy Policy, 2000, 28: 613-623
[154]李寿德,程少川,我国组建排污权交易市场问题研究,中国软科学,2000(8):19-23
[155]赵鹏高,严晨敏等,二氧化硫排放总量控制若干问题思考,电力环境保护,2006(8):1-4
[156]刘兰芬等,大气排污权交易政策及在我国电力行业发展中的应用,电力环境保护,1998,(1):21-26
[157]汤姆.惕藤伯格,环境经济学与政策(第三版),上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003
[158] Stavins, R.N. Market-based environmental policies: what can we learn from US experience (and Related Research)? Resources for the Future, 2003, DP: 3-43
[159] Springer, U.The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: a survey of model studies. Energy Economics, 2003, 25: 527–551
[160]张安华,排污权交易的可持续发展潜力分析,北京:经济科学出版社,2005
[161] Kenneth Arrow, Gretchen Daily etc, Managing Ecosystem Resources. http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten
[162]范华琼,环境保护与排污权交易,上海环境科学,2003,(5):11-13
[163]狄雯华,论排污权交易在中国的可行性,环境保护科学,2004,(2):69-70
[164]丁玉魏,排污权交易的经济优化机制研究,重庆环境科学,2004,(3): 9-11
[165]朱国宏,通向可持续发展的道路,上海:复旦大学出版社,1998
[166]李寿德,仇胜萍,排污权交易思想及其初始分配与定价问题探析,科学学与科学技术管理,2002 (7):1 4-15
[167]坎贝尔.麦克康奈尔,经济学原理.问题与政策,北京:北京大学出版社,2000
[168]哈密尔顿等,里约后五年—环境政策的创新,北京:中国环境出版社,1998
[169] Tao W D et al. Tradable discharge permit system for water pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 15(1): 27
[170] Ermoliev. Y, et al. Markets for tradeable emission and ambient permits: A dynamic approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000, 15(1): 39
[171] Reimund Schwarze et al. Sulfur Allowance Trading and the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market: A Comparative Design Analysis of Two Major Cap-and-Tra1de Permit Programs? Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003, 17: 279-298
[172] Stavins Robert N. What can we learn from the grand policy experiment? Lessons from SO allowance trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, 12: 69-89 2
[173] Godby, R. Market Power in Laboratory Emission Permit Markets. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 23: 279-318
[174] Van Egteren . H, M. Weber. Marketable Permits, Market Power and Cheating. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996, 30: 161-173
[175] Cason, T.N, Gandgadharan L. Transactions Cost in Tradable Permit Markets: An Experimental Study of Pollution Market Designs. Journal of Regulation Economics, 2003, 23(2):145–165
[176] Gangadharan, L. Transaction Costs in Pollution Markets: An Empirical Study. Land Economics, 2000, 76(4): 601-614
[177] Stranlund, J. K. Endogenous Monitoring and Enforcement of a Transferable Emissions Permit System. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1999, 38: 267-282
[178] Speck, S. Energy and carbon taxes and the distributional implications. Energy Policy, 1999, 27: 659–667
[179] Munksgaard, J., Ramskov, J. Effects of internalising external production costs in a North Europe power market. Energy Policy, 2002, 30: 501-510
[180] Hauch, J. Electricity trade and SO emission reductions in the Nordic Countries. Energy Economics, 2002, 25: 509-526 2
[181] Krupnick, Alan, Burtraw, Dallas. The social costs of electricity: do the numbers add up? Resource and Energy Economics, 1996, 18: 423–466
[182] Burtraw, D., Mansur, E. The environmental effects of SO trading and banking. Environmental Science and Technology 1999, 33: 3489–3494 2
[183] Burtraw, D., Krupnick, A., Palmer, K., Paul, A, Toman, M., Bloyd, C. Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the united states from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 45 (3): 650–673
[184] Joskow, P.L., Schmalensee, R., Bailey, E.M. The market for sulfur dioxide emissions. American Economic Review, 1998, 88: 669– 685
[185] Farzin, Y.H., Kort, P.M. Pollution abatement investment when environmental regulation is uncertain.Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2000, 2: 183– 212
[186] Requate, T. Incentives to innovate under emission taxes and tradable permits. European Journal of Political Economy, 1998, 14: 139– 165
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |