用户名: 密码: 验证码:
引入自我建构变量的3G服务接受模型研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
中国电信行业已全面进入3G时代,电信运营商大力推广3G服务,但3G市场发展的关键因素在于消费者是否愿意使用3G服务。因此,如何甄别影响消费者使用3G服务的关键因素成为了一个极具现实意义的研究课题。
     在综述前人对新技术接受意愿研究的基础上,发现消费者接受新技术时不仅受到新技术的易用性、有用性等因素的影响,还会受到消费者自身特质的影响。因此,在研究3G服务的接受意愿时,本研究主要聚焦消费者的自我建构特征,在技术接受模型的基础上,引入自我建构变量作为调节变量,建立3G服务接受模型,并通过实证研究的方式开展了以下两项研究:(1)研究影响消费者接受3G服务的关键因素;(2)探讨消费者表现出的自我建构取向是否对3G服务接受模型中变量间的关系存在调节作用。本研究采用问卷调研的方式收集数据,共发放450份问卷,收回有效问卷398份,并采用SPSS17.0和Lisre18.70对数据进行因子分析、信度分析、效度分析、结构方程模型以及多群组分析,得到以下主要结论:
     (1)自我建构作为文化差异在个体层面的体现对3G服务接受模型具有显著调节作用。对于依存型自我取向个体来说,主观规范对3G服务使用意愿的影响更强;对于独立型自我取向个体来说,感知易用性、感知有用性、感知成本对3G服务使用意愿的影响更强。
     (2)感知有用性对消费者的3G服务使用意愿具有显著的正向影响。
     (3)感知易用性和主观规范对感知有用性具有显著的正向影响,并间接影响3G服务使用意愿。
     (4)现阶段,消费者对3G服务的感知成本不会影响其使用意愿。
     基于以上结论,本研究从用户体验、营销方案、3G资费三个维度提出了3G服务推广的管理建议。
Telecom industry in China has completely entered the3G era, and telecom operators are actively promoting3G services.But the key factor in the development of3G market is consumers'willingness to use3G services.Therefore, how to identify the key factors affecting consumers to use3G services has become a research topic of great practical significance.
     Based on previous researches about acceptance of new technologies,we found that consumers' acceptance of new technologies was influenced not only by new technologies' factors(such as ease of use, usefulness), but also by the consumer's own characteristics.Therefore, this study mainly focuses on consumers' self-construction characteristics. Basing on the technology acceptance model,we introduce self-construal as a moderator, and build3G service acceptance model.By an empirical study we conducted the following two studies:(1)Study the key factors affecting consumers'acceptance of3G services;(2)Explore the effects of self-construal as a moderator on3G services acceptance.This study used a questionnaire to collect data. A total of450questionnaires were distributed and in which398questionnaires were valid. SPSS17.0and Lisre18.70were applied to analyze these data,through factor analysis, reliability analysis, validity analysis, SEM and multiple group analysis. The conclusions of this study are as below:
     (1)The relationships in3G services acceptance model are modified by self-construal.
     (2)Perceived usefulness has positive and significant impact on consumers' willingness to use3G services.
     (3)Perceived ease of use and subjective norm have positive significant impact on perceived usefulness, and indirectly effect consumers' willingness to use3G services.
     (4)At this stage,perceived cost of3G services will not affect consumers' willingness to use3G services.
     Based on these conclusions,this study discusses and offers several management recommendations for the development of3G services from user experience, marketing and tariff.
引文
[1]http://www.miit.gov.cn/n11293472/n11293832/n11294132/n12858447/14293382.html.工信部,3G用户数.
    [2]曹淑敏.移动通信与互联网的完美结合.世界通信.2011.(11).40-44.
    [3]马静,李开新.3G来临:移动通信产业价值链需要强力整合——运营商视角的产业价值链变革及对策分析.山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2009.(2).103-110.
    [4]田垒.3G服务使用意愿影响因素研究.[学位论文].浙江.浙江大学.2009.
    [5]M. Fishbein,I. Ajzen. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour:An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley,1975,
    [6]F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi,P. R. Warshaw. User acceptance of computer technology:a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science.1989. (35).982-1003.
    [7]I. Aizen. From intentions to actions:A theory of planned behavior. Action-control:From cognition to behavior.1985.11-39.
    [8]A. S. Notani. Moderators of perceived behavioral control's predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior:A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology.1998.7. (3).247-271.
    [9]F. D. Davis. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly.1989.319-340.
    [10]K. Mathieson. Predicting user intentions:comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information systems research.1991.2. (3).173-191.
    [11]S. Taylor,P. A. Todd. Understanding information technology usage:A test of competing models. Information systems research.1995.6. (2).144-176.
    [12]V. Venkatesh,F. D. Davis. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model:Four longitudinal field studies. Management science.2000. (46).186-204.
    [13]D. B. Meister,D. R. Compeau. Infusion of Innovation Adoption:An Individual Perspective:Paper presented at the Proceedings of the AS AC. Winnipeg, Manitoba.2002.
    [14]H. Van der Heijden, T. Verhagen,M. Creemers. Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European Journal of Information Systems. 2003.12.(1).41-48.
    [15]R. Vetschera, G. Kersten,S. Koszegi. User assessment of internet-based negotiation support systems:an exploratory study. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce. 2006.16. (2).123-148.
    [16]A. Y. L. Chong, K. B. Ooi, B. Lin,H. J. Bao. An empirical analysis of the determinants of 3G adoption in China. Computers in Human Behavior.2011.
    [17]F. M. Tseng,H. Y. Lo. Antecedents of consumers' intentions to upgrade their mobile phones. Telecommunications Policy.2011.35. (1).74-86.
    [18]Y. F. Kuo,S. N. Yen. Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value-added services. Computers in Human Behavior.2009.25. (1).103-110.
    [19]W. Teng, H. P. Lu,H. Yu. Exploring the mass adoption of third-generation (3G) mobile phones in Taiwan. Telecommunications Policy.2009.33. (10).628-641.
    [20]C. Lopez-Nicolas, F. J. Molina-Castillo,H. Bouwman. An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance:Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Information & Management.2008.45. (6).359-364.
    [21]M. Pagani. Determinants of adoption of third generation mobile multimedia services. Journal of interactive marketing.2004.18. (3).46-59.
    [22]王莉.基于UTAUT模型的3G业务用户接受影响因素研究.[学位论文].北京.北京邮电大学.2009.
    [23]刘卫民.3G移动增值服务内容构建策略研究.[学位论文].天津.天津大学.2009.
    [24]刘彬斌,康悦鑫.探索3G业务使用意愿的英系那个因素研究——以苏北地区在校大学生为例.经济研究导刊.2010.(33).204-205
    [25]葛冬玲,李尧.基于3G采用意愿研究结论浅谈我国3G营销建议.现代经济:现代物业中旬刊.2010.9.(005).104-105.
    [26]扈岩,王天乐,车宏生,李川.影响消费者接受3G手机的因素研究.未来与发展.2009.(008).41-46.
    [27]宋明元.3G体验对顾客购买意愿的影响研究.[学位论文].大连.大连理工大学.2011.
    [28]战康亮,孟迪,万忠坤,段梦瑶,刘业政.3G技术接受模型主要影响因素分析.大连理工大学学报.2011.51.(z1).
    [29]H. Sun,P. Zhang. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.2006.64. (2).53-78.
    [30]G. H. Subramanian. A Replication of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Measurement*. Decision Sciences.1994.25. (5-6).863-874.
    [31]G. C. Moore,I. Benbasat. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research.1991.2. (3).192-222.
    [32]D. L. Goodhue,R. L. Thompson. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS quarterly. 1995.213-236.
    [33]A. L. Lederer, D. J. Maupin, M. P. Sena,Y. Zhuang. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision support systems.2000.29. (3).269-282.
    [34]J. W. Moon,Y. G. Kim. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management.2001.38. (4).217-230.
    [35]V. Venkatesh. Determinants of perceived ease of use:Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research.2000.11. (4). 342-365.
    [36]D. Gefen,D. W. Straub. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail:An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS quarterly.1997.389-400.
    [37]鲁耀斌,徐红梅.技术接受模型的实证研究综述.研究与发展管理.2006.18.(003).93-99.
    [38]M. J. Sanchez-Franco, F. J. Martinez-L6pez,F. A. Martin-Velicia. Exploring the impact of individualism and uncertainty avoidance in Web-based electronic learning:An empirical analysis in European higher education. Computers & Education.2009.52. (3).588-598.
    [39]J. van Biljon,P. Kotze. Cultural factors in a mobile phone adoption and usage model. Journal of Universal Computer Science.2008.14. (16).2650-2679.
    [40]P. Harris, R. Rettie,C. K. Cheung. Adoption and usage of m-commerce:a cross-cultural comparison of Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 2005.6. (3).210-224.
    [41]P. A. Pavlou,L. Chai. What drives electronic commerce across cultures? A cross-cultural empirical investigation of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research.2002.3. (4).240-253.
    [42]S. Adapa. Adoption of internet shopping:Cultural considerations in India and Australia. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce.2008.13. (2).1-17.
    [43]C. Yoon. The effects of national culture values on consumer acceptance of e-commerce:Online shoppers in China. Information & Management.2009.46. (5).294-301.
    [44]D. Matsumoto. The discrepancy between consensual-level culture and individual-level culture. Culture & Psychology.2003.9. (1).89-95.
    [45]A. Realo. Comparison of public and academic discourses:Estonian individualism and collectivism revisited. Culture & Psychology.2003.9. (1).47-77.
    [46]王嘉慧.自我建构与社会规范敏感性对消费者商品属性偏好行为影响研究.[学位论文].华东璋工大学.2010.
    [47]H. Markus. Self-schemas and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1977. (35).63-78.
    [48]K. J. Gergen. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American psychologist. 1985.40. (3).266.
    [49]T. M. Singelis, H. C. Triandis, D. P. S. Bhawuk,M. J. Gelfand. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism:A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural research.1995.29. (3).240-275.
    [50]G. H. Hofstede. Culture's consequences:International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications, Inc,1984,
    [51]D. Trafimow, H. C. Triandis,S. G. Goto. Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1991.60. (5).649.
    [52]D. Oyserman, H. M. Coon,M. Kemmelmeier. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological bulletin.2002.128. (1).3.
    [53]H. R. Markus,S. Kitayama. Culture and the self:Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review.1991.98. (2).224.
    [54]T. M. Singelis. The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.1994.20. (5).580.
    [55]S. Bochner. Cross-cultural differences in the self concept. Journal of cross-cultural psychology. 1994.25. (2).273-283.
    [56]L. Lu,R. Gilmour. Developing a new measure of independent and interdependent views of the self. Journal of Research in Personality.2007.41. (1).249-257.
    [57]朱丽叶,卢泰宏.消费者自我建构研究述评.外国经济与管理.2008.30.(2).42-50.
    [58]刘艳,邹泓.自我建构理论的发展与评价.心理科学.2007.30.(5).1272-1275.
    [59]M. B. Brewer,W. Gardner. Who is this" We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of personality and social psychology.1996.71. (1).83.
    [60]刘艳,邹泓.自我建构理论的发展与评价.心理科学.2007.30.(5).1272-1275.
    [61]Z. Chen,M. T. Liu. A Research on Chinese Consumers' Using Intention on 3G Mobile Phones. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (AICT).2011.251. (251). 363-370.
    [62]Y. K. Choi,J. W. Totten. Self-construal's role in mobile TV acceptance:Extension of TAM across cultures. Journal of Business Research.2011.
    [63]G. M. Eckhardt,M. J. Houston. Cultural paradoxes reflected in brand meaning:McDonald's in Shanghai, China. Journal of International Marketing.2002.68-82.
    [64]N. Zhou,R. W. Belk. Chinese consumer readings of global and local advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising.2004.33. (3).63-76.
    [65]L. Lu,K. S. Yang. Emergence and composition of the traditional-modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Taiwanese societies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology.2006.9. (3). 167-175.
    [66]L. Lu. The individual-oriented and social-oriented Chinese bicultural self:testing the theory. The Journal of social psychology.2008.148. (3).347-374.
    [67]R. E. Nisbett, K. Peng, I. Choi,A. Norenzayan. Culture and systems of thought:holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological review.2001.108. (2).291.
    [68]H. C. Triandis, C. McCusker,C. H. Hui. Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of personality and social psychology.1990.59. (5).1006.
    [69]朱丽叶.消费者自我建构对中外品牌评价的影响研究.[学位论文].广州.中山大学.2009.
    [70]L. Lu,R. Gilmour. Developing a new measure of independent and interdependent views of the self. Journal of Research in Personality.2007.41. (1).249-257.
    [71]H. C. Triandis, R. Bontempo, H. Betancourt, M. Bond, K. Leung, A. Brenes, J. Georgas, C. H. Hui, G. Marin,B. Setiadi. The measurement of the etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology.1986.38. (3).257-267.
    [72]H. C. Triandis,M. J. Gelfand. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of personality and social psychology.1998.74. (1).118.
    [73]A. Aron, E. N. Aron,D. Smollan. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of personality and social psychology.1992.63. (4).596.
    [74]D. A. Aaker,K. L. Keller. Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. The Journal of Marketing. 1990.27-41.
    [75]J. E. Escalas,J. R. Bettman. Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research.2005.32. (3).378-389.
    [76]N. Agrawal,D. Maheswaran. The Effects of Self-Construal and Commitment on Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research.2005.31. (4).841-849.
    [77]K. Polyorat, D. L. Alden,D. L. Alden. Self-construal and need-for-cognition effects on brand attitudes and purchase intentions in response to comparative advertising in Thailand and the United States. Journal of Advertising.2005.34. (1).37-48.
    [78]V. Swaminathan, K. L. Page,Z. Gurhan Canli. "My" Brand or "Our" Brand:The Effects of Brand Relationship Dimensions and Self-Construal on Brand Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research.2007.34. (2).248-259.
    [79]施光荣.负面信息情境下自我建构、自我概念联结与品牌原产地联结对消费者品牌态度的影响研究.[学位论文].长沙.湖南师范大学.2009.
    [80]黄韫慧,施俊琦.反对民族品牌论陷?自我建构和自我状态的影响.北京大学学报:自然科学版.2010.(4).681-684.
    [81]N. Mandel. Shifting selves and decision making:The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research.2003.30. (1).30-40.
    [82]Kyoungmi Lee,Sharon Shavitt. Special Session Summary:The Influence of Culture Thinking Style on Evaluative Process. Advances in Consumer Research.2004.31. (3).204-313.
    [83]熊素红,景奉杰.自我建构对群体购买环境中冲动性购买行为的影响.情报杂志.2009.(011).198-202.
    [84]车爱玉.网络环境下自我建构对冲动性购买行为的影响研究.[学位论文].济南.山东大学.2011.
    [85]Q. Chen, H. M. Chen,R. Kazman. Investigating antecedents of technology acceptance of initial eCRM users beyond generation X and the role of self-construal. Electronic Commerce Research. 2007.7. (3).315-339.
    [86]P. G. Schierz, O. Schilke,B. W. Wirtz. Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services:An empirical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications.2010.9. (3). 209-216.
    [87]C. Kim, M. Mirusmonov.I. Lee. An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Computers in Human Behavior.2010.26. (3).310-322.
    [88]P. Luarn,H. H. Lin. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior.2005.21. (6).873-891.
    [89]I. Ha, Y. Yoon,M. Choi. Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management.2007.44. (3).276-286.
    [90]M. C. Lee. Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking:An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications.2009. 8. (3).130-141.
    [91]H. Verkasalo, C. L6pez-Nicolas, F. J. Molina-Castillo,H. Bouwman. Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications. Telematics and Informatics.2010.27. (3).242-255.
    [92]J. van Biljon,P. Kotze. Cultural factors in a mobile phone adoption and usage model. Journal of Universal Computer Science.2008.14. (16).2650-2679.
    [93]J. Lu, C. Liu, C. S. Yu,K. Wang. Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data services in China. Information & Management.2008.45. (1).52-64.
    [94]S. J. Hong, K. Y. Tam,J. Kim. Mobile data service fuels the desire for uniqueness. Communications of the ACM.2006.49. (9).89-94.
    [95]S. Kim,G. Garrison. Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption:An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Frontiers.2009.11. (3).323-333.
    [96]W. Teng, H. P. Lu,H. Yu. Exploring the mass adoption of third-generation (3G) mobile phones in Taiwan. Telecommunications Policy.2009.33. (10-11).628-641.
    [97]C. L6pez-Nicolas, F. J. Molina-Castillo,H. Bouwman. An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance:Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Information& Management.2008.45. (6).359-364.
    [98]S. Taylor,P. Todd. Assessing IT usage:The role of prior experience. MIS quarterly.1995. 561-570.
    [99]V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis,F. D. Davis. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly.2003.425-478.
    [100]J. H. Wu,S. C. Wang. What drives mobile commerce?:An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management.2005.42. (5).719-729.
    [101]J. H. Cheong,M. C. Park. Mobile payment adoption in Korea:Switching from credit card.2008. 1-22.
    [102]J. F. Veiga, S. Floyd,K. Dechant. Towards modelling the effects of national culture on IT implementation and acceptance. Journal of Information Technology.2001.16. (3).145-158.
    [103]C. Yoon. The effects of national culture values on consumer acceptance of e-commerce:Online shoppers in China. Information & Management.2009.46. (5).294-301.
    [104]H. S. Park,T. R. Levine. The theory of reasoned action and self-construal:Evidence from three cultures. Communications Monographs.1999.66.(3).199-218.
    [105]M. Srite,E.Karahanna. The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly.2006.30. (3).679-704.
    [106]N. Mallat, M. Rossi, V. K. Tuunainen,A. Oorni. An empirical investigation of mobile ticketing service adoption in public transportation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.2008.12. (1). 57-65.
    [107]E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of innovations. Free Pr,1995,
    [108]吴明隆.结构方程模型——AMOS的操作与运用.2009,3-36.
    [109]http://www.miit.gov.cn/n11293472/n11293832/n11294132/n12858447/14620393.html.
    [110]余建英,何旭宏.数据统计分析与SPSS应用.北京:人民邮电出版社,2003,292-298.
    [111]张文彤,董伟SPSS统计分析高级教程.北京:高等教育出版社,2004,218-220.
    [112]C. Fornell,D. F. Larcker. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research.1981.39-50.
    [113]L. A. Hayduk. Structural equation modeling with LISREL:Essentials and advances. Johns Hopkins Univ Pr,1987,
    [114]P. M. Bentler. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological bulletin.1990.107. (2). 238.
    [115]J. S. Armstrong,T. S. Overton. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of marketing research.1977.396-402.
    [116]P. M. Bentler. On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the< em> Bulletin.. Psychological bulletin.1992.112. (3).400.
    [117]R. M. Baron,D. A. Kenny. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology.1986.51. (6).1173.
    [118]侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.经济科学出版社,2004,
    [119]温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用.心理学报.2005.37.(2).268-274.
    [120]L. R. James,J. M. Brett. Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology.1984.69. (2).307.
    [121]A. A. Economides,A. Grousopoulou. Students'thoughts about the importance and costs of their mobile devices'features and services. Telematics and informatics.2009.26. (1).57-84.
    [122]J. E. Escalas,J. R. Bettman. Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research.2005.32. (3).378-389.
    [123]S. P. Jain, K. K. Desai,H. Mao. The influence of chronic and situational self-construal on categorization. Journal of Consumer Research:An Interdisciplinary Quarterly.2007.34. (1). 66-76.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700