健全我国版权间接侵权制度研究
|
摘要
首先:本文以技术发展和变革为线索,介绍了版权间接侵权制度的产生和发展情况,尤其是应对不断进步的技术变革和创新,各国立法及司法实践对该制度所做的调整。论证了作为一项版权法律制度,在协调社会公众利益和版权人利益及版权领域不同产业之间利益的平衡,维护版权法公平正义之价值方面所做的努力。
其次:本文分析了我国版权侵权制度的现状,从版权间接侵权制度的发展历史、法律制度的价值及福利经济学上的卡尔多希克斯效率角度论证了我国独立的版权间接侵权制度的理论基础;从我国学术界对于该制度的研究成果、我国版权侵权司法实践、及我国经济技术发展需求等方面论证了独立的版权间接侵权制度的合理性和必要性。
再次:本文分析了主要的大陆法系国家和英美法系国家的版权间接侵权制度,结合我国侵权法和版权侵权制度的理论基础,指出了间接侵权和间接责任的差别,针对我国版权间接侵权制度的现状及弊端,从前述理论基础及现实需求出发,提出了我国未来版权法修改关于该制度的基本架构,包括版权侵权行为的构成要件、版权间接侵权责任的归责原则及责任模式(包括责任构成要件及责任形式),以期能尽抛砖引玉之功效,进一步完善我国版权间接侵权制度。
Firstly, this article introduces the development of the indirect infringement law of copyright from the prospective of technology innovation, especially the adjustment of the law in many countries facing the advancement of the sociality. The article demonstrates the values of the law in balancing the interests of the public and the people who owns the copyright and safeguarding the justice of the sociality.
Secondly, this article analyzes the infringement law of copyright in our country. And lays the base of theory of the new and independent indirect infringement law of copyright from the prospective of the history of the law, the value of the law and Kaldor-Hicks efficiency. And the same time, the article demonstrates the rationality and necessity of the indirect infringement law of copyright from the prospective of the research achievements of the scholars, the practice of justice and the development of technology and sociality.
Thirdly, this article analyzes the indirect infringement law of copyright in the main counties from common law system and civil law system. On the grounds of infringement law of copyright, this article separates the indirect infringement and the indirect liability. And at the same time, the article gives the frame of the indirect infringement law of copyright of our country, including the basic and essential elements, the principle of the liability and different kinds of the liabilities in the hope of more mature and comprehensive proposals.
其次:本文分析了我国版权侵权制度的现状,从版权间接侵权制度的发展历史、法律制度的价值及福利经济学上的卡尔多希克斯效率角度论证了我国独立的版权间接侵权制度的理论基础;从我国学术界对于该制度的研究成果、我国版权侵权司法实践、及我国经济技术发展需求等方面论证了独立的版权间接侵权制度的合理性和必要性。
再次:本文分析了主要的大陆法系国家和英美法系国家的版权间接侵权制度,结合我国侵权法和版权侵权制度的理论基础,指出了间接侵权和间接责任的差别,针对我国版权间接侵权制度的现状及弊端,从前述理论基础及现实需求出发,提出了我国未来版权法修改关于该制度的基本架构,包括版权侵权行为的构成要件、版权间接侵权责任的归责原则及责任模式(包括责任构成要件及责任形式),以期能尽抛砖引玉之功效,进一步完善我国版权间接侵权制度。
Firstly, this article introduces the development of the indirect infringement law of copyright from the prospective of technology innovation, especially the adjustment of the law in many countries facing the advancement of the sociality. The article demonstrates the values of the law in balancing the interests of the public and the people who owns the copyright and safeguarding the justice of the sociality.
Secondly, this article analyzes the infringement law of copyright in our country. And lays the base of theory of the new and independent indirect infringement law of copyright from the prospective of the history of the law, the value of the law and Kaldor-Hicks efficiency. And the same time, the article demonstrates the rationality and necessity of the indirect infringement law of copyright from the prospective of the research achievements of the scholars, the practice of justice and the development of technology and sociality.
Thirdly, this article analyzes the indirect infringement law of copyright in the main counties from common law system and civil law system. On the grounds of infringement law of copyright, this article separates the indirect infringement and the indirect liability. And at the same time, the article gives the frame of the indirect infringement law of copyright of our country, including the basic and essential elements, the principle of the liability and different kinds of the liabilities in the hope of more mature and comprehensive proposals.
引文
[1]瞿中鞠.“网络时代的著作权保护”国际研讨会综述[J].法商研究,2004,(4):141-144.
[2]郑成思.私权、知识产权与物权的权利限制[J].法学,2004,(9) .
[3]郑成思.侵害知识产权的无过错责任[J].中国法学,1998,(1):81-90.
[4]吴汉东.财产权客体制度论-以无形财产权客体为主要研究对象[J].法商研究2002,(2):45-58.
[5]刘英.法理越辩越清-北京第二中级人民法院计算机软件最终用户责任问题研讨笔记[J].电子知识产权,2003,(10):34-35.
[6]吴汉东.法哲学家对知识产权法的哲学解读[J].法商研究,2002,(5):77-85.
[7]吴凤玲,王成梅.关于专利间接侵权的独立性[J] .厦门科技,2004,(3):26-29 .
[8]许胜锋.计算机网络的著作权保护[J].河北法学,2000,(3):27-30.
[9]沈木珠.论计算机软件保护及法律适用-中国知识产权第一案评析[J].政法学刊,2001,(2): 40-43.
[10]刘德良.论网络服务商在侵权法中的地位与责任[J].法商研究, 2001,(5):111-119.
[11]朱玲娣.论我国版权技术体系保护制度的完善[J].科技与法律,2004(4),78-84.
[12]刘家瑞.论新兴文件共享技术的版权间接责任(下)[J].电子知识产权,2004,(9):28-31.
[13]蒋志培.论知识产权侵权损害的赔偿(下)[J].电子知识产权,1998,(2):7-10.
[14]付子堂.论知识经济时代法律对科技行为的调控[J].法商研究,2000,(1):3-8.
[15]刘家瑞.论中国版权间接责任制度的建立-兼论网络服务商责任制度的完善[J].电子知识产权,2004,(11):23-29.
[16]孙孟新.美国科技领域法律政策框架概览[J].科技与法律,2004,(4):15-21.
[17]赵启杉.美国专利政策新动向-美国联邦贸易委员会“促进创新”报告介评[J].世界知识产权,2004,(6):51-56.
[18]杨红菊.欧盟《计算机程序可专利性指令》的最新进展[J].电子知识产权,2005,(2):25-26.
[19]林秀芹.从法律经济学的角度看专利制度的利弊-兼论我国<专利法>的修订[J].电子知识产权,2004,(11):61.
[20]刘可静,张敏.世界版权集体管理组织在数字环境下的新发展[J].世界知识产权,2004,(6):57-61.
[21]郎贵梅.论知识产权侵权行为认定和责任确定的制度设计-兼论过错在知识产权侵权行为认定和赔偿责任确定中的意义[J].知识产权文丛(10),北京:中国方正出版社.
[22]蒋志培.谈TRIPS协议第45条肯定的知识产权侵权赔偿的归责原则[J].调处、仲裁,诉讼,2005,40-42.
[23]谢惠加.网络版权帮助侵权与替代侵权规则初探—GROKSTER案的评介[J].电子知识产权,2003,(12):41-43.
[24]薛虹.网络内容提供者的版权侵权责任[J].知识产权,2005,9-12.
[25]丁道勤.宪政视野下的知识产权-读《美国知识产权法》[J].电子知识产权, 2004,(10):19-21.
[26]钟强,新《计算机软件保护条例》中软件最终用户的法律责任[J].社会科学, 2002,(12):47-51.
[27]王迁.新型P2P技术对传统版权间接侵权责任理论的挑战-Grokster案评述[J].电子知识产权,2004,(11):30-34.
[28]刘家瑞.NAPSTER案与文件共享技术的版权责任[J].科技与法律,2004,(4):69-78.
[29]李朝应.也谈软件侵权的界定-与寿步先生商榷[J].电子知识产权,1999,(12): 10-13.
[30]曹新明.知识产权法哲学理论反思-以重构知识产权制度为视角[J].电子知识产权,2005,(2):56.
[31]黄玉烨.知识产权利益衡量论-兼论后TRIPS时代知识产权国际保护的新发展[J].法商研究,2004,(5):89-96.
[32]程永顺,罗李华.中美两国对专利侵权行为的规定比较[J].电子知识产权,1999,(5):6.
[33]王迁.索尼案二十年祭——回顾、反思与启示[J].科技与法律,2004,(4):59-68 .
[34]王迁.挑战网络接入服务商责任的界限——美国Verizon案评介[J].电子知识产权,2004,(9):51-54.
[35]王迁.论版权法中的间接责任[J].科技与法律,2005,(2):50-59 .
[36]冯晓青.知识产权法哲学[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2003.
[37]李明德.美国知识产权法[M].北京;法律出版社,2003.
[38]韦之.著作权法原理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
[39]李明德、许超.著作权[M].北京:法律出版社.,2003.
[40]薛虹.网络时代的知识产权法[M].北京:法律出版社,2000.
[41]郑成思等主编.知识产权文丛(第二卷、第四卷)[M].北京:中国方正出版社.
[42]郑成思等主编.知识产权研究(第八卷)[M].北京:中国方正出版社.
[43]【法】阿兰,沙塔尼奥尔.著作权和版权保护-概念的区别与适应数字时代[J].于平安译,中国出版,2005(2),41-44.
[44]【美】波斯纳著,知识产权法的经济学分析[M].金海军译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004年版.
[45]【英】约翰,亚当斯.《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》第45条的执行[J].法商研究,汤树梅,金美蓉译,2002,(6):131-135.
[46]【德】M.雷炳德著.著作权法[M].张恩民译.北京:法律出版社,2004年第13版.
[47]【德】克雷斯蒂安·冯·巴尔.《欧洲比较侵权行为法》[M],张新宝译.北京:法律出版社,2003年版.81.
[48] Douglas Lichtman, William Landes.Indirectliaility for Copyright Infringement : An Economic Perspective[J].Harvard Journal of law and technology ,spring, 2003.
[49] Mark A .Lemley, R.Anthony Reese.Reducting Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation[J].Stanford Law Review,May,2004.
[50] Pamela Samuelson,Suzanne Scotchmer. The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering[J].Yale Law Journal ,May ,2002.
[51] Lior Jacob Strahilevitz .Charismatic Code ,Social Norms and The Emergence of Cooperation on The File-Swapping Networks [J].Virginia Law Review ,May , 2003.
[52] Gregory Scott Nortman. Indirect Liability of ISPs for Peer-to-Peer Copyright Infringement after the Verizon Decision[J].Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property ,Spring,2005 .
[53] Michael J. Maurer. Too Many Markets or Too Few? Copyright Policy Toward Shared Works[J].Southern California Law Review , July , 2004.
[54] Assaf Hamdani. Gatekeeper Liability[J].Southern California Law Review , November ,2003.
[55] Elizabeth M. Harris. School Houses Rock : University Response to The Threat of Contributory Copyright Infringement and Forced Compliance of The Digital Millenntium Copyright Act : The Entertainment Industry May Have Won The Battle Against Napster , But Can It Win The War Against Universities ? [J].Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal , 2004.
[56] David McGowan. Copyright Nonconsequentialism[J] , Missouri Law Review, Winter, 2004.
[57] Fred Von Lohmann. Protecting Content in The Digital Environment[J]. Loyal Angels Entertain- ment Law Journal , April , 2001.
[58] Richard J. Gilbert , Michael L. Katz. The Economics of Indirect Liability for Copyright Infringement[J]. Hastings Law Journal, April, 2001.
[59] Jesse M. Feder. Is Betamax Obsolete? Sony Corp. of America V. Universal City Studios , Inc. In The Age of Napster[J]. Creighton Law Review , June , 2004
[60] Robert A. Gilmore. Peer-to-Peer. Copyright Jurisprudence in The New File-Sharing World , The Post Grokster Landscape of Indirect Copyright Infringe-ment and The Digital Millennium Copyright Act[J].Florida Coastal Law Journal ,Spring , 2004.
[61] Benjamin H. Glatstein. Tertiary Copyright Liability[J].University of Chicago Law Review,Fall,2004.
[62] Justin Graham. Preserving the Aftermarket in Copyrighted Works: Adapting theFirst Sale Doctrine to the Emerging Technological Landscape[J] . Stanford Technology Law Review,2002.
[63] J.H. Reichmann. the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property Rights : of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation[J]. Vanderbilt Law Review, November, 2000.
[64] Adam Mossoff. What Is Property ? Putting The Pieces Back Together[J]. Arizona Law Review, Summer, 2003.
[65] Neil Weinstocks Netanel. Impose a Noncommercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-to-Peer File Sharing[J]. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Fall, 2003.
[66] Barbara Kolsun and Jonathan Bayer. Indirect Infringement and Counterfeiting :Remedies Available Against Those Who Knowingly Rent to Counterfeiters[J]. Yeshiva University , Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal , 1998.
[67] Kelley E. Moohr. Going Once , Going Twice , Sold ! Are Sales of Copyrighted Items Exposing Internet Auction Sites To Liability? [J]. Loyola of LosAngeles Entertainment Law Review , 2000.
[68] Joseph P. Liu. The Law and Technology of Digital Rights Management : The DMCA and the Regulation of Scientific Research [J].Berkeley Technology Law Journal , Spring , 2003.
[69]《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》
[70]《保护录音制品制作者禁止未经许可复制其录音制品日内瓦公约》
[71]《电子商务指令》
[72]《英国版权法》(1911年)
[73]《版权、外观设计与专利法》(1988年)
[74]《澳大利亚版权法》
[75]《加拿大版权法》
[76]《美国版权法》(1976年)
[77]《美国千禧年数字版权法》(DMCA)
[78]《美国家庭录音法》(1992年)
[79]《中华人民共和国民法通则》
[80]《中华人民共和国著作权法》(2001年)
[81]《最高人民法院关于审理涉及计算机网络著作权纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(2003年)
[82]《关于修改<最高人民法院关于审理涉及计算机网络著作权纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释>的决定》(2003年)
[83]《互联网著作权行政保护办法》(2005年)
[84]《中华人民共和国计算机软件保护条例》
[85]《最高人民法院关于贯彻执行民法通则若干问题的意见》
[86]《信息网络传播权保护条例》(2006年)
[2]郑成思.私权、知识产权与物权的权利限制[J].法学,2004,(9) .
[3]郑成思.侵害知识产权的无过错责任[J].中国法学,1998,(1):81-90.
[4]吴汉东.财产权客体制度论-以无形财产权客体为主要研究对象[J].法商研究2002,(2):45-58.
[5]刘英.法理越辩越清-北京第二中级人民法院计算机软件最终用户责任问题研讨笔记[J].电子知识产权,2003,(10):34-35.
[6]吴汉东.法哲学家对知识产权法的哲学解读[J].法商研究,2002,(5):77-85.
[7]吴凤玲,王成梅.关于专利间接侵权的独立性[J] .厦门科技,2004,(3):26-29 .
[8]许胜锋.计算机网络的著作权保护[J].河北法学,2000,(3):27-30.
[9]沈木珠.论计算机软件保护及法律适用-中国知识产权第一案评析[J].政法学刊,2001,(2): 40-43.
[10]刘德良.论网络服务商在侵权法中的地位与责任[J].法商研究, 2001,(5):111-119.
[11]朱玲娣.论我国版权技术体系保护制度的完善[J].科技与法律,2004(4),78-84.
[12]刘家瑞.论新兴文件共享技术的版权间接责任(下)[J].电子知识产权,2004,(9):28-31.
[13]蒋志培.论知识产权侵权损害的赔偿(下)[J].电子知识产权,1998,(2):7-10.
[14]付子堂.论知识经济时代法律对科技行为的调控[J].法商研究,2000,(1):3-8.
[15]刘家瑞.论中国版权间接责任制度的建立-兼论网络服务商责任制度的完善[J].电子知识产权,2004,(11):23-29.
[16]孙孟新.美国科技领域法律政策框架概览[J].科技与法律,2004,(4):15-21.
[17]赵启杉.美国专利政策新动向-美国联邦贸易委员会“促进创新”报告介评[J].世界知识产权,2004,(6):51-56.
[18]杨红菊.欧盟《计算机程序可专利性指令》的最新进展[J].电子知识产权,2005,(2):25-26.
[19]林秀芹.从法律经济学的角度看专利制度的利弊-兼论我国<专利法>的修订[J].电子知识产权,2004,(11):61.
[20]刘可静,张敏.世界版权集体管理组织在数字环境下的新发展[J].世界知识产权,2004,(6):57-61.
[21]郎贵梅.论知识产权侵权行为认定和责任确定的制度设计-兼论过错在知识产权侵权行为认定和赔偿责任确定中的意义[J].知识产权文丛(10),北京:中国方正出版社.
[22]蒋志培.谈TRIPS协议第45条肯定的知识产权侵权赔偿的归责原则[J].调处、仲裁,诉讼,2005,40-42.
[23]谢惠加.网络版权帮助侵权与替代侵权规则初探—GROKSTER案的评介[J].电子知识产权,2003,(12):41-43.
[24]薛虹.网络内容提供者的版权侵权责任[J].知识产权,2005,9-12.
[25]丁道勤.宪政视野下的知识产权-读《美国知识产权法》[J].电子知识产权, 2004,(10):19-21.
[26]钟强,新《计算机软件保护条例》中软件最终用户的法律责任[J].社会科学, 2002,(12):47-51.
[27]王迁.新型P2P技术对传统版权间接侵权责任理论的挑战-Grokster案评述[J].电子知识产权,2004,(11):30-34.
[28]刘家瑞.NAPSTER案与文件共享技术的版权责任[J].科技与法律,2004,(4):69-78.
[29]李朝应.也谈软件侵权的界定-与寿步先生商榷[J].电子知识产权,1999,(12): 10-13.
[30]曹新明.知识产权法哲学理论反思-以重构知识产权制度为视角[J].电子知识产权,2005,(2):56.
[31]黄玉烨.知识产权利益衡量论-兼论后TRIPS时代知识产权国际保护的新发展[J].法商研究,2004,(5):89-96.
[32]程永顺,罗李华.中美两国对专利侵权行为的规定比较[J].电子知识产权,1999,(5):6.
[33]王迁.索尼案二十年祭——回顾、反思与启示[J].科技与法律,2004,(4):59-68 .
[34]王迁.挑战网络接入服务商责任的界限——美国Verizon案评介[J].电子知识产权,2004,(9):51-54.
[35]王迁.论版权法中的间接责任[J].科技与法律,2005,(2):50-59 .
[36]冯晓青.知识产权法哲学[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2003.
[37]李明德.美国知识产权法[M].北京;法律出版社,2003.
[38]韦之.著作权法原理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
[39]李明德、许超.著作权[M].北京:法律出版社.,2003.
[40]薛虹.网络时代的知识产权法[M].北京:法律出版社,2000.
[41]郑成思等主编.知识产权文丛(第二卷、第四卷)[M].北京:中国方正出版社.
[42]郑成思等主编.知识产权研究(第八卷)[M].北京:中国方正出版社.
[43]【法】阿兰,沙塔尼奥尔.著作权和版权保护-概念的区别与适应数字时代[J].于平安译,中国出版,2005(2),41-44.
[44]【美】波斯纳著,知识产权法的经济学分析[M].金海军译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004年版.
[45]【英】约翰,亚当斯.《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》第45条的执行[J].法商研究,汤树梅,金美蓉译,2002,(6):131-135.
[46]【德】M.雷炳德著.著作权法[M].张恩民译.北京:法律出版社,2004年第13版.
[47]【德】克雷斯蒂安·冯·巴尔.《欧洲比较侵权行为法》[M],张新宝译.北京:法律出版社,2003年版.81.
[48] Douglas Lichtman, William Landes.Indirectliaility for Copyright Infringement : An Economic Perspective[J].Harvard Journal of law and technology ,spring, 2003.
[49] Mark A .Lemley, R.Anthony Reese.Reducting Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation[J].Stanford Law Review,May,2004.
[50] Pamela Samuelson,Suzanne Scotchmer. The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering[J].Yale Law Journal ,May ,2002.
[51] Lior Jacob Strahilevitz .Charismatic Code ,Social Norms and The Emergence of Cooperation on The File-Swapping Networks [J].Virginia Law Review ,May , 2003.
[52] Gregory Scott Nortman. Indirect Liability of ISPs for Peer-to-Peer Copyright Infringement after the Verizon Decision[J].Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property ,Spring,2005 .
[53] Michael J. Maurer. Too Many Markets or Too Few? Copyright Policy Toward Shared Works[J].Southern California Law Review , July , 2004.
[54] Assaf Hamdani. Gatekeeper Liability[J].Southern California Law Review , November ,2003.
[55] Elizabeth M. Harris. School Houses Rock : University Response to The Threat of Contributory Copyright Infringement and Forced Compliance of The Digital Millenntium Copyright Act : The Entertainment Industry May Have Won The Battle Against Napster , But Can It Win The War Against Universities ? [J].Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal , 2004.
[56] David McGowan. Copyright Nonconsequentialism[J] , Missouri Law Review, Winter, 2004.
[57] Fred Von Lohmann. Protecting Content in The Digital Environment[J]. Loyal Angels Entertain- ment Law Journal , April , 2001.
[58] Richard J. Gilbert , Michael L. Katz. The Economics of Indirect Liability for Copyright Infringement[J]. Hastings Law Journal, April, 2001.
[59] Jesse M. Feder. Is Betamax Obsolete? Sony Corp. of America V. Universal City Studios , Inc. In The Age of Napster[J]. Creighton Law Review , June , 2004
[60] Robert A. Gilmore. Peer-to-Peer. Copyright Jurisprudence in The New File-Sharing World , The Post Grokster Landscape of Indirect Copyright Infringe-ment and The Digital Millennium Copyright Act[J].Florida Coastal Law Journal ,Spring , 2004.
[61] Benjamin H. Glatstein. Tertiary Copyright Liability[J].University of Chicago Law Review,Fall,2004.
[62] Justin Graham. Preserving the Aftermarket in Copyrighted Works: Adapting theFirst Sale Doctrine to the Emerging Technological Landscape[J] . Stanford Technology Law Review,2002.
[63] J.H. Reichmann. the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property Rights : of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation[J]. Vanderbilt Law Review, November, 2000.
[64] Adam Mossoff. What Is Property ? Putting The Pieces Back Together[J]. Arizona Law Review, Summer, 2003.
[65] Neil Weinstocks Netanel. Impose a Noncommercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-to-Peer File Sharing[J]. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Fall, 2003.
[66] Barbara Kolsun and Jonathan Bayer. Indirect Infringement and Counterfeiting :Remedies Available Against Those Who Knowingly Rent to Counterfeiters[J]. Yeshiva University , Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal , 1998.
[67] Kelley E. Moohr. Going Once , Going Twice , Sold ! Are Sales of Copyrighted Items Exposing Internet Auction Sites To Liability? [J]. Loyola of LosAngeles Entertainment Law Review , 2000.
[68] Joseph P. Liu. The Law and Technology of Digital Rights Management : The DMCA and the Regulation of Scientific Research [J].Berkeley Technology Law Journal , Spring , 2003.
[69]《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》
[70]《保护录音制品制作者禁止未经许可复制其录音制品日内瓦公约》
[71]《电子商务指令》
[72]《英国版权法》(1911年)
[73]《版权、外观设计与专利法》(1988年)
[74]《澳大利亚版权法》
[75]《加拿大版权法》
[76]《美国版权法》(1976年)
[77]《美国千禧年数字版权法》(DMCA)
[78]《美国家庭录音法》(1992年)
[79]《中华人民共和国民法通则》
[80]《中华人民共和国著作权法》(2001年)
[81]《最高人民法院关于审理涉及计算机网络著作权纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(2003年)
[82]《关于修改<最高人民法院关于审理涉及计算机网络著作权纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释>的决定》(2003年)
[83]《互联网著作权行政保护办法》(2005年)
[84]《中华人民共和国计算机软件保护条例》
[85]《最高人民法院关于贯彻执行民法通则若干问题的意见》
[86]《信息网络传播权保护条例》(2006年)