用户名: 密码: 验证码:
缺血性脑卒中的OCSP分型与NIHSS评分、临床神经功能缺损评分及预后之间相关性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的探讨缺血性脑卒中牛津郡社区卒中项目(Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project,OCSP)各亚型美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,NIHSS)评分、临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)间差异,各亚型的Barthel指数(Barthel index,BI)间是否存在差异,两种评分与Barthel指数间是否存在相关性,为正确选用脑卒中神经功能缺损评分量表评估病情及评价预后提供依据。方法前瞻性连续收集2008年11月至2009年12月宁夏医科大学附属医院神经内科收治的缺血性脑卒中病例资料,对符合纳入标准的586例患者入院时进行OCSP分型,并在入院当天进行NIHSS评分和临床神经功能缺损评分(中国),在发病90天时对患者进行随诊,统计死亡率,并以Barthel指数为标准,电话或门诊随访其个人日常生活活动能力(activities of daily living,ADL)。对OCSP分型、NIHSS评分和临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)间的差异作比较,并与Barthel指数做相关性分析。结果(1)缺血性脑卒中患者OCSP分型各亚型中,LACI患者所占比例最大,其次为PACI、TACI,比例最小的为POCI。OCSP各亚型患者在年龄和性别构成方面无显著性差异。根据患者入院时神经功能缺损进行的OCSP分型结果与MR诊断结果及发病24小时后的CT诊断结果比较,两者总的一致率为89.2%,其中TACI为90.5%,PACI为83.6%,POCI为82.5%,LACI为92.5%。说明缺血性脑卒中患者OCSP分型与影像学诊断结果有着良好的一致性。(2)缺血性脑卒中OCSP各亚型患者入院时的NIHSS评分比较,差异有统计学意义,其中OCSP分型中TACI入院时的NIHSS评分最高,表明其神经功能缺损程度最高,发病90天Barthel指数最低,发病90天死亡率最高,死亡率与其他各亚型比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),预后最差。LACI入院时NIHSS评分最低,表明其神经功能缺损程度最低,发病90天Barthel指数最高,发病90天死亡率为零,预后最好。(3)缺血性脑卒中患者OCSP各亚型入院时的临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)比较,差异有统计学意义,其中OCSP分型中TACI入院的临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)最高,表明其神经功能缺损程度最高,LACI入院时的临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)最低,表明其神经功能缺损程度最低。(4)缺血性脑卒中患者入院时NIHSS评分与临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)在存活组和死亡组之间差异有统计学意义,且死亡组的两种评分明显高于存活组。在缺血性脑卒中OCSP分型中各型入院时NIHSS评分和临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)的比较中,得出结果为:TACI、PACI亚型患者入院时的NIHSS评分与Barthel指数相关系数较高;POCI、LACI亚型患者入院时的临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)与Barthel指数相关系数较高。表明缺血性脑卒中患者OCSP分型中TACI、PACI最适合的量表是NIHSS评分; POCI、LACI最合适的量表是临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)。因此建议在不同分型中使用较合适的量表或者综合两个量表对病情及预后进行评估。结论对缺血性脑卒中患者在其发病早期进行正确的OCSP临床分型,不同亚型间选择NIHSS评分或临床神经功能缺损评分(中国)进行神经功能缺损评价,或将两种评分联合应用综合评价,在病情合理评估、个体化治疗、预测预后及正确的健康教育等方面有着重要的意义。
Objective To study the difference of NIHSS scale and the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale among the ischemic stroke OCSP subtypes, whether there are the Barthel Index’s differences and correlations between the two scales, to choose suitable neurological defect clinical rating scales evaluating pathogenetic condition and measuring termination.
     Mthods Prospective continuously collected all the case data of ischemic stroke patients admitted to the department of neurology of our hospital from 2008.11 ~2009.12, there were 586 patients coincided with the criteria, they were classified into Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project subtypes when in hospital, were tested with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale respectively at admission, then calculated case fatality rate when they were followed up at 90 day after stroke and tested with the Barthel index at discharge to follow-up visit each activities of daily living by telephone or out-patient clinic. Compared NIHSS scale and the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale of each OCSP subtype, and analysised their correlations with the Barthel index.
     Results (1) Contrast the OCSP subtypes’constituent ratio of the ischemic stroke patients, the 1acunar infarct patients occupy the largest proportion, then the partial anterior circulation infarct patients, the total anterior circulation infarct patients, the smallest were the posterior circulation infarct patients. Each OCSP subtype were not significantly different between the ages and the genders. Compared the results of the patients’neurologic deficits on admission with that of the MR diagnosis and/or after 24 hours of CT, the total concordance rate was 89.2%, the concordance rate of TACI was 90.5%, PACI was 83.6%, POCI was 82.5%, LACI was 92.5%. It indicated the OCSP subtypes and the imaging diagnosis results had favourable coincidence.(2)Compare the NIHSS scores of each OCSP subtype when they were on admission, the differences have statistical significance, the NIHSS score of TACI is the highest, indicate the most serious neurologic deficit, the lowest Barthel Index and the highest case fatality rate at 90 day after stroke and compared with other subtypes has statistically significant differences(P<0.01), the worst prognosis. The NIHSS score of LACI is the lowest, indicate the mildest neurologic deficit, the highest Barthel Index and 0 case fatality rate at 90 day after stroke, the best prognosis. (3)Compare the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale scores of each OCSP subtype when they were on admission, the differences have statistical significance, the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale score of TACI is the highest, indicate the most serious neurologic deficit; the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale score of LACI is the highest, indicate the mildest neurologic deficit.(4)The differences of the NIHSS scores and the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale scores between survival and decease group in have statistical significance, and the two scores of the decease group are all significantly higher than the survival group. Compare each OCSP subtype of the NIHSS and the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale, we can conclude: the coefficient correlation of the NIHSS and Barthel Index in TACI and PACI is higher than the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale; the coefficient correlation of the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale and Barthel Index in POCI and LACI is higher than the NIHSS. These indicate the more suitable measuring scale of TACI and PACI is the NIHSS; the more suitable measuring scale of POCI and LACI is the Chinese Clinical Neurological Defect scale. So when evaluating pathogenetic condition and measuring termination, we suggest choose the more suitable measuring scale or combine the two measuring scales.
     Conclusions For the ischemic stroke patient, OCSP classification in the early onset, choose the more suitable measuring scale or combine the two measuring scales can be used to evaluate pathogenetic condition, guide the direct treatment, measure termination and right health education.
引文
[1]卫生部疾病控制司及中华医学会神经分会编写《中国脑血管病防治指南》. 2005年1月.
    [2] Bamford J, Sandercock P, DennisM, et al. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction[J]. Lancet, 1991, 337 (8756) : 1521-1526.
    [3]李振东,黄海威,苏镇培等.急性脑梗死神经功能缺损和3个月结局的牛津郡社区卒中项目分型评估.中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2004年9月第26卷第9期: 527-529.
    [4]王拥军.中国医学论坛报, 2005年9月15-29版.
    [5]全国第四届脑血管病学术会议.脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损程度评分标准(1995).中华神经科杂志. 1996 : 29,381-383.
    [6] Lee BC, HwangSH, Jung S, et al. The Hallym Stoke Registry: a webbased stroke data bank with analysis of 1654 consecutive patients with acute stroke[J]. Eur Neurol, 2005, 54 (2) : 8l-87.
    [7] Wei G, Ji X, Bai H, Ding Y. Stroke research in China. Neurolo Res.2006 ; 28 : 11-15.
    [8] Arrich J, Lalouschek W, Mullner M.Influence of socioeconomic status on mortality after stroke: retrospective cohort study. Stroke, 2005, 36 (2) : 310-314.
    [9] Stover Hertzberg V, Weiss P, Stern BJ, et al. Family history associated with improved functional outcome following ischemic stroke. Neuroepidemiology, 2006, 27 (2) : 74-80.
    [10] Muscari A, Puddu GM, Cenni A, et al. Mean platelet volume(MPV) increase during acute non-lacunar ischemic strokes. Thromb Res. 2009 Feb;123(4):587-91.
    [11] Alvaro LC, Timiraos J, Sádaba F. In-hospital stroke:clinical profile and expectations for treatment. Neurologia. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):4-9.
    [12] Kobayashi A, Wardlaw JM, Lindley RI, et al. Oxfordshinre community stroke project clinical stroke syndrome and appearances of tissue and vascular lesions on pretreatment ct in hyperacute ischemic stroke among the first 510 patients in the Third InternationalStroke Trial (IST-3). Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):743-8.
    [13] Campanella N, Daher W, et al. The probability of assessing the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke. Study of 81 patients. Recenti-Prog-Med, 2000 Feb, 91 : 63-66.
    [14] Liu ming. Distribution and outcomes of ischaemic stroke subtypes by OCSP classification Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, Volume 76 (4). April 2005 : 604.
    [15]赵丽宏.韩杰.缺血性脑卒中不同分型的比较及临床应用价值的探讨.当代医学2009年6月.第15卷.第16期,总第171期,8-10.
    [16] De Silva DA, Woon FP, et al. Intracranial large artery disease among OCSP subtypes in ethnic South Asian ischemic stroke patients. J Neurol Sci.2007, 260 (1-2) : 147-149.
    [17] Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Baldereschi M, et al. Risk factors and outcome of sub types of ischemic stroke. Data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry. The European Community Stroke Project. J Neurol Sci. 2006 May 15;244(1-2):143-50.
    [18] Vukasovic I, Tesija-Kuna A, Topic E, et al. Matrix metallproteinases and their inhibitors acute stroke subtypes. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(4):428-34.
    [19]张丽芳,杜彦辉,孔繁元.急性脑梗塞与脑出血危险因素的对比研究.宁夏医学杂志2007年2月,第29卷,第2期,115-118.
    [20] Luk JK, Cheung RT, Ho SL, Li L.Does age predict outcome in stroke rehabilitation? A study of 878 Chinese subjects.Cerebrovasc Dis, 2006, 21 (4) : 229-234.
    [21] Paolucci S, Bragoni M, Coiro P, et al. Is sex a prognostic factor in stroke rehabilitation? Amatched comparison.Stroke, 2006 , 37 (12) : 2989-2994.
    [22]方侃,王为珍等.急性脑梗死OCSP分型与影像学分型的关系.上海交通大学学报(医学版),Vol. 27 No. 7 Jul. 2007. 866-868.
    [23] Hacke W, Furlan AJ, Al-Rawi Y, et al. Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging ro perfusion CT(DIAS-2): a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-comtrolled study. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Feb;8(2):141-50.
    [24] Phillips SJ, Dai D, Mitnitski A, et al. Clinical diagnosis of lacunar stroke in the first 6 hours after symptom onset: analysis of data from the glycine antagonist in neuroprotection(GAIN) Americas trial. Stroke. 2007 Oct;38(10):2706-11.
    [25] Taylor WJ, Wong A, Siegert RJ, et al.Effectiveness of a clinical pathway for acute stroke care in a district general hospital :an audit. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb 23;6-16
    [26] Seifert T, Enzinger C, Storch MK, et al. Acute small subcortical infarcrions on diffusion weighted MRI: clinical presentation and aetiology. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;76(11):1520-4
    [27]陈汉波,吴振东.急性脑梗死早期OCSP分型的临床应用评价.医学与哲学. 2006年10月,第27卷,总第319期,33-35.
    [28] Mead G, Wardlaw M. Relationship bewteen pattern of intracranial artery abnormalities on transcranial doppler and Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project clinical classification of ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2000, 31 : 714-719.
    [29] Tei H, Uchiyama S. Correlation between symptomatic, rediological diagnosis in acute ischemic stroke. Acta-Neurol-Scand, 1999, 99 : 192-195.
    [30] Johnson BA, Heiserman JE, Drayer BP, et al. Intracranial MR angiography: its role in the integrated approach to brain infarction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1994, 15 : 901-908.
    [31]张微微,黄勇华,李娟.缺血性脑卒中患者按牛津郡社区卒中规划分型与预后关系的临床研究.北京医学,2006,28(4) : 193-195.
    [32]栗文彬,刘学东.老年缺血性脑卒中患者按牛津郡社区脑卒中规划临床分型与预后的关系.中华老年心脑血管病杂志. 2008年6月,第10卷,第6期,444-446.
    [33]何文龙,高重阳,赵建民.缺血性脑卒中OCSP分型及其与预后关系的分析.中国使用神经病学杂志. 2007年8月,第10卷,第5期,24-26.
    [34] Bruno A, Saha C, Williams LS. Percent change on the National Institutes of Health Storke Scale: a useful acute stroke outcome measure. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009 Jan;18(1):56-9.
    [35]王大力,赵晓晶,常莉莎.四种评分对脑卒中患者预后评价的比较.中国煤炭工业医学杂志. 2005年3月,第8卷,第3期,238-240.
    [36] Sun TK, Chiu SC, Yeh SH, et al. Assessing reliability and validity of the chinese version of the stroke scale: Scale development. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 ; 43 : 457-463
    [37] Goldstein Reliability of the National Institutes of Health sroke seale: extensionton on nenurologistsin thee on text fo a eliniealtrial. Stoke, 1997, 28, 307-310.
    [38] Meyer BC, Lyden PD, Al-Khoury L, et al. Prospective reliability of the STROKE DOC wireless/site indepengdengt telemedicine system. Neurology, 2005, 64 : 1058-1060.
    [39]王新,王拥军,刘峥.四个脑卒中量表信度与效度的对比研究中华物理医学与康复杂志. 1999年9月,第21卷,第3期,140-142.
    [40]施咏梅.急性脑梗死OCSP分型与影像学分型及病因学分型之间关系的研究.中国全科医学,2005年5月,第8卷,第9期,724-726.
    [41]张华军,徐格林.牛津郡社区卒中分型患者脑动脉狭窄的分布.中国急救医学. 2007年5月,第27卷,第5期,389-391.
    [42]陈雪莲,杜鹃,范学杰等. OCSP分型与脑梗死急性期神经功能缺损和预后的相关性研究.脑卒中与神经疾病. 2005年8月,第12卷,第4期,233-235.
    [43] Johnston KC, Wagner DP. Relationship between 3-month National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and dependence in ischemic stroke patients. Neuroepidemiology, 2006, 27 (2) : 96-100.
    [44]刘雅,刘学东.缺血性脑卒中OCSP分型及其对生存率的影响.中华临床医学杂志. 2008年4月,第9卷,第4期,40-41.
    [45] Jehkonen M, Laihosalo M, Kettunen JE. Impact of neglect on functional outcome afterstroke: a review of methodological issues and recent research findings. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2006, 24 (4-6) : 209-215.
    [46] Leung SO, Chan CC, Shah S. Development of a chinese version of the modified Barthel Index--validity and reliability. Clin Rehabil. 2007 ; 21 : 912-922.
    [47] Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):119-22.
    [48] Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-DauPhinee S. Barthel Index information elicited over the telephone: is it reliable? Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 1995, 74 : 9-18.
    [49]杜敢琴,黄丽娜,富奇志等.脑卒中预后的影响因素分析[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2005,4 (1) : 57-59.
    [50] Uyttenboogaart M, Stewart RE, Vroomen PC, et al. Optimizing cutoff scores for the barthel index and the modified Rankin Scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 2005 ; 36 : 1984-1987.
    [51] Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke background and studyprotocol. Stroke, 1985, 16 : 885.
    [52]巫嘉陵,安中平.脑卒中患者神经功能缺损评分信度和与结局的相关性分析.天津医药. 2007年8月,第35卷,第8期,617-618.
    [1] Chandraabc RK. Whole health: a prescription for the new millennium [J]. Nurtrition Research, 2001, 21 : 1.
    [2] Thomson R, Parkin D, Eccles M, et al. Decision analysis and guidelines foranticoagulant therapy to prevent stroke in patients with a trial fibrillation [J]. The Lancet, 2000, 355 : 956.
    [3] Tismit SG, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, et al. Early clinical defferentiation of cerebral infarction from severe atherosclerotic stenosis and cardioembolism [J]. Stroke, 1992, 23 : 486.
    [4] Bogousslavsky J. Pierre P Ischemic stroke in patients under age 45. Neurol Clin, 1992, 10 (1) : 113-114.
    [5] Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial, TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment [J]. Stroke, 1993, 24 (1) : 35.
    [6] Adams HP, Davis PH, Leira EC, Chang KC, Bendixen BH, Clarke WR, Woolson RF, Hansen MD. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: A report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment(TOAST).Neurology, 1999, 53 (1) : 126-131.
    [7] Hajat C, Sharma P. Efects of poststroke pyrexia on stroke outcome: a meta-analysis of studies in patients. Stroke; 2000, 31 : 410-414.
    [8] Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, et al. Classification and history Clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction.Lancet, 1991, 337 : 1521-1526.
    [9] Hallstrom B, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Stroke inlundorup, Sweden : Improved long-term survival among elderly stroke patients [J]. Stroke, 2002, 33 (6) : l624-l629.
    [10] Mead G, Wardlaw M. Relationship bewteen pattern of intracranial artery abnormalities on transcranial doppler and Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project clinicalclassification of ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2000, 31 : 714-719.
    [11]陈汉波,吴振东.急性脑梗死早期OCSP分型的临床应用评价.医学与哲学. 2006年10月,第27卷,总第319期,33-35.
    [12] Wardlaw J, Dennis M. The validitity of a simpie clinical classification of acute ischaemic stroke. J-Neurol, 1996, 243 : 274-279.
    [13] Tei H, Uchiyama S. Correlation between symptomatic, rediological diagnosis in acute ischemic stroke. Acta-Neurol-Scand, 1999, 99 : 192-195.
    [14] Al-buharia R, Phillis S J, Liewe Lin, et al. Prediction of infarct totxgraphy using the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classificati.one of stroke subtypes[ J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,1998,7(5):339-343.
    [15] Sharma JC, Fletcher S, vassallo M, et a1. Prognostic value of CT scan features in acute ischemic stroke and relationship with clinical stroke syndromes. Int J Clin Pract, 2000, 54 : 514-518.
    [16]李振东,朱良付,杨智云等.脑梗死急性期OCSP分型的效度评价.中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2004, 30 (1) : 17-20.
    [17] Li H, Wong KS, Kay R. Relationship between the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification and vascular abnormalities in patients with predominantly intracranial atherosclerosis [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2003, 207 (1-2) : 65-69.
    [18] Woo D, Gebel J, Miller R, et al. Incidence rates of first-ever ischemic stroke subtypes among blacks: a population-based study. Stroke. 1999 Dec ; 30 (12) : 25 17-22.
    [19]王新.王拥军等.四个脑卒中量表信度和效度的对比研究.中华物理医学杂志. 1999 ; 21 : 140-143.
    [20]方侃,王为珍等.急性脑梗死OCSP分型与影像学分型的关系.上海交通大学学报(医学版), Vol. 27 No. 7 Jul. 2007. 866-868.
    [21]施咏梅.急性脑梗死OCSP分型与影像学分型及病因学分型之间关系的研究.中国全科医学,2005年5月,第8卷,第9期,724-726.
    [22] Campanella N, Daher W, et al. The probability of assessing the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke. Study of 81 patients. Recenti-Prog-Med, 2000 Feb, 91 : 63-66.
    [23] Tei H, Uchiyama S. Deteriorating ischemic stroke in 4 clinical categories classfied by the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke, 2000, 31 : 2049-2054.
    [24] Gautier JC. Stroke-in-progression. stroke, 1985 ; 16 (4) : 118-119.
    [25] Liu ming. Distribution and outcomes of ischaemic stroke subtypes by OCSP classification Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, Volume 76 (4). April 2005 : 604.
    [26] Wong KS, Li H, Chan YL, et a1. Use of transcranial Doppler ultrasound to predict outcome in patients with intracranial large artery occlusive disease [J], Stroke, 2000, 31 (11) : 2641-2647.
    [27] Jones HR, Millikan CH, Sandok BA. Temporal profile (clinical course) of acute vertebrobasilar system cerebral infarction. stroke 1980, 11 : 173-177.
    [28] Mead GE,Shingler H,Farrell A,et al.Carotid disease in acute stroke. AgeAgeing, 1998, 27 (6) : 667-682.
    [29]陆军,王大明.老年症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的临床干预研究.中华老年心脑血管病杂. 2007年,7月,第9卷,第7期,435-438.
    [30]栗文彬,刘学东.老年缺血性脑卒中患者按牛津郡社区脑卒中规划临床分型与预后的关系.中华老年心脑血管病杂志. 2008年6月第10卷第6期, 444-446.
    [31]许晓辉,许予明.缺血性卒中改良的TOAST分型与OCSP分型关系的研究.中国实用内科杂志. 2008年7月,第28卷,第7期. 538-539.
    [32] Castillo J, Dávalos A, Naveiro J, et al. Neuroexcitatory amino acids and their relation to infarct size and neurological deficit in is2chemic stroke. Stroke, 1996, 27 (6) : 1060-1065.
    [33] Dávalos A, Castillo J, Serena J, et al. Duration of glutamate release after acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 1997, 28 (4) : 708-710.
    [34] Hill MD, Jackowski G, Bayer N, et al. Biochemical markers in acute ischemic stroke.CMAJ, 2000, 162 (8) : 1139-1140.
    [35] Catto AJ, Carter AM, Barrett JH, et al. von Willebrand factor and factor VIII: C in acute cerebrovascular disease. Relationship to stroke subtype and mortality. Thromb Haemost, 1997, 77 (6) : 11042-11081.
    [36] Muir KW, Weir CJ, Murray GD, Povey C, Lees KR. Comparison of neurological scales ands coring systems for acute stroke prognosis [J]. Stroke, 1996, 27 : 1817.
    [37]刘雅,刘学东.缺血性脑卒中OCSP分型及其对生存率的影响.中华临床医学杂志. 2008年4月,第9卷,第4期,40-41.
    [38]张华军,徐格林.牛津郡社区卒中分型患者脑动脉狭窄的分布.中国急救医学. 2007年5月,第27卷,第5期,389-391.
    [39] Tei H, Uchiyama S.Progressive ischemic stroke in the symptomatic subtypes of the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Jpn J stroke, 1998, 20 : 456-461.
    [40] Heuschmann PU, Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Misselwitz B, et al. German Stroke Registers Study Group. Predictors of in-hospital mortality and attributable risks of death after ischemic stroke : the German Stroke Registers Study Group. Arch Intern Med, 2004, 164 : 1761-1768.
    [41] Brott TG, Adams HP Jr, 0linger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke, 1989, 20 : 864-870.
    [48] Lyden PD, Lu M, Levine SR, et al. NINDS rtPA Stroke Study Group. A modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for use in stroke clinical trials: preliminary reliability and validity. Stroke, 2001, 32 : 1310-1317.
    [43]巫嘉陵,安中平.脑卒中患者神经功能缺损评分信度和与结局的相关性分析.天津医药.2007年8月,第35卷,第8期,617-618.
    [44] Sehlege1 D, Kolb SJ, Luciano JM, et al. Utility of the NIH Stroke Scale as a predictor of hospital disposition. Stroke, 2003, 34 : 134-137.
    [45] Sehlegel DJ, Tanne D, Demchuk AM, et al. Multicenter rt-PA Stroke Survey Group.Prediction of hospital disposition after thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Arch Neurol, 2004, 61 : 1061-1064.
    [46] Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale: extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke, 1997, 28 : 307-310.
    [47] Meyer BC, Hemmen TM, Jackson CM, et al. Modified National Institutes of Health stroke scale for use in stroke clinical trials: Prospective reliability and validity. Stroke, 2002, 33 : 1261-1266.
    [48] Lyden P, Lu M, Jackson C, et al. for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. Stroke, 1999, 30 : 2347-2354.
    [49] Sun TK, Chiu SC, Yeh SH, et al. Assessing reliability and validity of the chinese version of the stroke scale:Scale development. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 ; 43 : 457-463.
    [50] Kasner SE, Cucchiara BL, McGarvey ML, et al. Modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale can be estimated from medical records. Stroke. 2003 ; 34 : 568-570.
    [51] Arenillas JF, Rovira A, Molina CA, et al. Prediction of early neurological deterioration using diffusion-and perfusion-weighted imaging in hyperacute middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke [J]. Stroke, 2002, 33 (9) : 2197-2203.
    [52]廖晓凌,王伊龙,王拥军等.急性缺血性卒中超早期不同梗死部位分型的临床特征及预后.中国康复理论与实践. 2007年3月,第13卷,第3期,212-214.
    [53] Johnston KC, Wagner DP. Relationship between 3-month National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and dependence in ischemic stroke patients. Neuroepidemiology, 2006, 27 (2) : 96-100.
    [54] Johnston KC, Wagner DP, Haley EC Jr, et al. RANTTAS Investigators Randomized Trial of Tirilazad Mesylate in Acute Stroke. Combined clinical and imaging information as an early stroke outcome measure. Stroke, 2002, 33 (2) : 466-472.
    [55] Felberg RA, Okon NJ, El-Mitwalli A, et al. Early dramatic recovery during intravenous tissue plasminogen activator infusion: clinical pattern and outcome in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke, 2002, 33 (5) : 1301-1307.
    [56]王大力,彭延波,邢磊等. NIHSS评分在急性脑梗死患者中的应用与回归方程的建立.华北煤炭医学院学报. 2007年5月,9 (3),297-298.
    [57] DeGraba TJ, Hallenbeck JM, Pettigrew KD, et al. Progression in acute stroke: value of the initial NIH Stroke Scale score on patient stratification in future trials. Stroke. 1999 ;3 0 : 1208-1212.
    [58]曲东锋.国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分可预测急性缺血性卒中的动脉闭塞及闭塞部位. Cerebrovasc Dis Foreign Med Sci, October 15,2005-Vol 13,No.10, 736.
    [59]张填,马涤辉,孙龙.脑卒中患者预后影响因素的分析.医学综述. 2007年3月,第13卷,第5期,385-387.
    [60] Meyer BC, Lyden PD, Al-Khoury L, et al. Prospective reliability of the STROKE DOC wireless/site indepengdengt telemedicine system. Neurology, 2005, 64 : 1058-1060.
    [68] Krieger DW, Demchuk AM, Kasner SE, et al. Early Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Fatal Brain Swelling In Ischemic Stroke [J]. Stroke(S0039-2499), 1999, 30 (2) : 287-292.
    [62] Di Legge S, Saposnik G, Nilanont Y, et al. Neglecting the Difference: Does Right or Left Matter in Stroke Outcome After Thrombolysis? [J] Stroke(S0039-2499), 2006, 37 (8) : 2066-2069.
    [63] Fink JN, Selin MH, Kumar S, et al. Is the association of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Scores and Acute Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stroke Volume Equal for Patients with Right-and Left-hemispheric Stroke? [J]Stroke(S00392499), 2002, 33 (4) : 954-958.
    [64] Hillis AE, Wityk RJ, Barker PB, et al. Change in Perfusion in Acute Nondominant Hemisphere Stroke May Be Better Estimated by Tests of Hemispatial Neglect Than bythe National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale[J]. Stroke(S0039-2499), 2003, 34 (10) : 2392-2396.
    [65] Merino JG, Heilman KM. Editorial Comment-Measurement of Cognitive Deficits in Acute Stroke[J]. Stroke (S00392499), 2003, 34 (10) : 2396-2398.
    [66] Fink JN, Frampton CM, Lyden P, et al. Does Hemispheric Lateralization Influence Functional and Cardiovascular Outcomes After Stroke? An Analysis of Placebo-treated Patients From Prospective Acute Stroke Trials[J]. Stroke (S00392499), 2008, 9 (12) : 3335-3340.
    [67] Di Legge S, Fang J, Saposnik G, et al. The Impact of Lesion Side on Acute Stroke Treatment [J]. Neurology, 2005, 65 (1) : 81-86.
    [68]高远,李硕.脑卒中临床特征偏侧差异.神经损伤与功能重建. 2009年5月,第4卷,第3期,219-221.
    [69]全国第四届脑血管病学术会议.脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损程度评分标准.中华神经科杂志. 1996 ; 29 : 381.
    [70] Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke background and studyprotocol. Stroke, 1985, 16 : 885.
    [71]巫嘉陵,安中平.脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力评定量表应用的评价.中国现代神经疾病杂志. 2007年4月,第7卷,第2期,146-147.
    [72] Orgogozo JM, Asplund K, Boysen G. A unified form for neurological scoring of hemispheric stroke with motor impairment.Stroke. 1992; 23 : 1678-1679.
    [73]道免和久,才藤荣一,千野直一.脑卒中患者机能评价法探讨. (2)-Stroke Impairment Assessment Set ( SIAS).リハ医学, 1990, 27 : 547-548.
    [74]王拥军.卒中单元.科学技术文献出版社; 2004,487-489.
    [75] Hantson L, De Weerdt W, De Keyser J, et al. The European Stroke Scale. Stroke. 1994; 25 : 2215-2219.
    [76] Cote R, Hachinski VC, Shurvell BL, et al. The Canadian Neurological Scale: Apreliminary study in acute stroke. Stroke. 1986; 17 : 731-737.
    [77] Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke--background and study protocol. Scandinavian stroke study group. Stroke. 1985; 16 : 885-890.
    [78] Clesen J, Simonsen K. Reproduccibility and utility of a simple neurological scoring system for stroke ptients(the Copenhagen stroke scale). J Neuro Rehab. 1988; 2 : 59-63.
    [79] Shinar D, Gross CR, Bronstein KS, et al. Reliability of the Activities of Daily Living scale and its use in telephone interview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1987, 68 : 723-728.
    [80] Leung SO, Chan CC, Shah S. Development of a chinese version of the modified Barthel Index-validity and reliability. Clin Rehabil. 2007; 21 : 912-922.
    [81] Sinoff G, Ore L. The Barthel activities of daily living index: selfreporting versus actual performance in the old-old(≥75years). J Am Geriatr Soc, 1997, 45 : 832-836.
    [82] Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Diringer MN. Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2003, 40 : 1-8.
    [83] Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, et al. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel Index, and 10 item Barthel Index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; 73 : 188-190.
    [84] Uyttenboogaart M, Stewart RE, Vroomen PC, et al. Optimizing cutoff scores for the barthel index and the modified Rankin Scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 2005; 36 : 1984-1987.
    [85] Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE. The stroke rehabilitation outcome study-PartⅠ: general description. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1988, 69 : 506-509.
    [86] Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1979, 60 : 14-17.
    [87] Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J, 1965, 14 : 61-65.
    [88]陶寿熙,刘文耀,银占魁.一种简易型偏瘫运动功能评价法的应用.中国康复, 1992, 7 : 155-158.
    [89] Weimar C, Kurth T, Kraywinkel K, et al. Assessment of functioning and disability after ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2002, 33 : 2053-2059.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700