福州国家森林公园旅游静养区环境评价与建设研究
|
摘要
福州国家森林公园是国家十大示范国家级森林公园之一，是福州唯一的4A景区。经过三十多年的建设工作，福州国家森林公园已经发展成为福州市民日常休闲度假的理想场所，但由于其建成时间比较长，游客对于景区的景观已经十分熟悉。森林公园正面临着旅游吸引力有所下降的问题，如何能够合理的进行森林公园的二期开发建设，是关系到森林公园未来发展的一个至关重要的问题，是实现森林公园可持续发展的必由之路。
对于一个自然环境为主的景区，生态环境质量的好坏是评价其景观质量的最为重要的因素，而福州国家森林公园作为一个国家级的十大示范公园在此之前还从未系统的做过这方面的评测工作，正所谓“水背源则流竭，木无根则不长”只有全面准确的掌握了森林公园内各区域的生态环境质量的具体情况，才能在进一步二期的景观建设中做到有的放矢，箭不虚发。
本文针对森林公园旅游静养区建设研究，于2003年7月和11月间两次到福州国家森林公园实地进行了旅游生态环境质量的测定与旅游视觉环境质量的评价工作，并在市区进行了对比性的试验。在环境因子的选取上我们主要选取了与人们健康关系比较密切的空气负离子、可吸入颗粒物、空气中细菌含量、以及环境中的噪音状况四个因子进行评测。通过评测研究得出了如下结论：福州国家森林公园内的环境质量远远优于福州市区，是理想的休闲静养场所。在公园内各景观区域中兰苑、古藤、刻字潭三个景观区域的环境质量最为优越，非常适合进行旅游静养区的规划与建设工作。
在方法上采用定量与定性相结合的方法。在客观评测的基础上选取出了适宜的基址区域，为随后的建设工作奠定了坚实的基础，并进一步进行了整个静养区的景观规划与项目的设计工作，在静养区项目设计中引人园艺医疗、森林氧吧、有氧健康步道等对人体健康有宜的活动项目，让来公园中的人们能更加深入地利用森林资源，达到强身健体的目的。森林环境资源与国民健康的密切关系还不为大多数人所了解，本文研究的一个主要目的就是为这一方面的评价和建设工作，提供一个比较完善的可供借鉴的方法体系。
Fuzhou National Forest Park is one often top parks of china. It is the only 4A scenery spot in Fuzhou. After 30years construction, Fuzhou National Forest Park has become an ideal area to spend the leisure time for residenters of Fuzhou. Because the national park has been there for a long time, and the residents are very familiar with the whole area, the Fuzhou national park is just losing its attraction. How could we do reasonable reconstruction and exploitation is a very important thing to the future development of the national park. And it is the only way through which the Fuzhou national park could achieve containable development.
When a natural spot is talked about, the eco-environment quality is the most important factor that we have to consider about. Fuzhou national park, as one of the top ten national parks of china, has not make this kind of eco-environment evaluation till now. People always say that a tree could not grow up if there is not a root. If only people well know the detail of eco-environment condition in different areas of the park they can make the following construction job just hit the aim.
We went to Fuzhou national park twice in July and November 2003, and finished the job of eco-environment quality evaluation and vision quality evaluation. At the same time we make the construct experimentation at urban area. When we choose the environment factors, the factors that have important relationship with person's heaths are chose first, they are Air Anion air dusts bacterial content and environment noise. The following conclusion are reached: the eco-environment quality in the park are much better than the city zone of fuzhou, and lanyuan, kezitan, guteng, are ideal areas for convalescent area.
The method of fix quantify is combined with the method of determine the nature to finish the whole research. At the basic of impersonality measure we find the ideal area to continue our reconstruction. And we continue progress the job of convalesce layout and item design. At the process of convalescent area design we bring in the item of horticultural therapy forest oxygen bar, and health walkway and some other activities that
can do good to people's health. The tourist could through use this kind of methods to utilize the forest resource to promote their health condition. The relationship of forest environment and people's health is still not well known by many people. And one main aim of my research is to find a consummate evaluation and construction system.
对于一个自然环境为主的景区，生态环境质量的好坏是评价其景观质量的最为重要的因素，而福州国家森林公园作为一个国家级的十大示范公园在此之前还从未系统的做过这方面的评测工作，正所谓“水背源则流竭，木无根则不长”只有全面准确的掌握了森林公园内各区域的生态环境质量的具体情况，才能在进一步二期的景观建设中做到有的放矢，箭不虚发。
本文针对森林公园旅游静养区建设研究，于2003年7月和11月间两次到福州国家森林公园实地进行了旅游生态环境质量的测定与旅游视觉环境质量的评价工作，并在市区进行了对比性的试验。在环境因子的选取上我们主要选取了与人们健康关系比较密切的空气负离子、可吸入颗粒物、空气中细菌含量、以及环境中的噪音状况四个因子进行评测。通过评测研究得出了如下结论：福州国家森林公园内的环境质量远远优于福州市区，是理想的休闲静养场所。在公园内各景观区域中兰苑、古藤、刻字潭三个景观区域的环境质量最为优越，非常适合进行旅游静养区的规划与建设工作。
在方法上采用定量与定性相结合的方法。在客观评测的基础上选取出了适宜的基址区域，为随后的建设工作奠定了坚实的基础，并进一步进行了整个静养区的景观规划与项目的设计工作，在静养区项目设计中引人园艺医疗、森林氧吧、有氧健康步道等对人体健康有宜的活动项目，让来公园中的人们能更加深入地利用森林资源，达到强身健体的目的。森林环境资源与国民健康的密切关系还不为大多数人所了解，本文研究的一个主要目的就是为这一方面的评价和建设工作，提供一个比较完善的可供借鉴的方法体系。
Fuzhou National Forest Park is one often top parks of china. It is the only 4A scenery spot in Fuzhou. After 30years construction, Fuzhou National Forest Park has become an ideal area to spend the leisure time for residenters of Fuzhou. Because the national park has been there for a long time, and the residents are very familiar with the whole area, the Fuzhou national park is just losing its attraction. How could we do reasonable reconstruction and exploitation is a very important thing to the future development of the national park. And it is the only way through which the Fuzhou national park could achieve containable development.
When a natural spot is talked about, the eco-environment quality is the most important factor that we have to consider about. Fuzhou national park, as one of the top ten national parks of china, has not make this kind of eco-environment evaluation till now. People always say that a tree could not grow up if there is not a root. If only people well know the detail of eco-environment condition in different areas of the park they can make the following construction job just hit the aim.
We went to Fuzhou national park twice in July and November 2003, and finished the job of eco-environment quality evaluation and vision quality evaluation. At the same time we make the construct experimentation at urban area. When we choose the environment factors, the factors that have important relationship with person's heaths are chose first, they are Air Anion air dusts bacterial content and environment noise. The following conclusion are reached: the eco-environment quality in the park are much better than the city zone of fuzhou, and lanyuan, kezitan, guteng, are ideal areas for convalescent area.
The method of fix quantify is combined with the method of determine the nature to finish the whole research. At the basic of impersonality measure we find the ideal area to continue our reconstruction. And we continue progress the job of convalesce layout and item design. At the process of convalescent area design we bring in the item of horticultural therapy forest oxygen bar, and health walkway and some other activities that
can do good to people's health. The tourist could through use this kind of methods to utilize the forest resource to promote their health condition. The relationship of forest environment and people's health is still not well known by many people. And one main aim of my research is to find a consummate evaluation and construction system.
引文
[1]蔡宏道主编 现代环境卫生(第一版)[M]北京：人民卫生出版社，1995 866
[2]蔡宏道 现代环境卫生学．北京：人民卫生出版社，1995．870．
[3]陈鑫峰，王雁．森林景观的定量评价和经营技术研究现状．世界林业研究，2000，13(5)31—38
[4]崔凤军《风景旅游区的保护与管理》中国旅游出版社
[5]但新球 龚艳 森林景观设计的心理学基础，中南林业调查规划，2000，3
[6]但新球 龚艳 现代森林景观设计美学原则，中南林业调查规划，2000，5
[7]但新球 姜海湘，森林浴场的规划设计探讨，中南林业调查规划，1999，8第18卷第3期
[8]但新球，森林公园的疗养保健功能及在规划中的应用，中南林业调查研究，1994，1
[9]方开泰 马长兴，正交设计的最新发展和应用，数理统计与管理1999，1，44—49
[10]黄建武，陶家元，空气负离子资源开发与生态旅游，华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)2002，6(2)257—260
[11]黄绳纪 空气离子与环境[J]广东环境科学，1999(1)：43
[12]李安伯 加快制订生产环境中空气离子卫生标准的步伐[J]中华劳动卫生职业病杂志，1984，2(5)：296
[13]李安伯，．加快制定空气离子卫生标准．中华劳动卫生与职业病，1984，2(5)：297．
[14]李安伯，我国空气负离子生物效应的研究，辐射与环境生物物理研究，中国科学技术出版社，1992，59-63
[15]李辉 赵卫智，北京5种草坪地被植物生态效益的研究．中国园林，1998,4：36～387
[16]林策良 陈斌，充分发挥水在城市建设中的作用．科学中国人，2000(7)：9．
[17]林忠宁，空气负离子在卫生保健中的作用，[J]生态科学，1999,6(2)87-90
[18]刘福才等，城市绿地绿化环境效益的研究．中国园林，1986，2：10～116
[19]刘振礼王兵，．新编中国旅游地理．天津：南开大学出版社，1996．109．
[20]卢云亭，．现代旅游地理．南京：江苏人民出版社，1988．379．
[21]卢云亭，自然景观旅游生态系统的结构、功能和开发保护战略研究．北京：中国林业出版社，1991．488
[22]卢云亭 王建军，《生态旅游学》旅游教育出版社，2001
[23]吕忠义，森林公园总体规划理论与技术的探讨，华东森林经理，2000，1第14卷
[24]农钢，空调净化房间空气负离子变化和影响因素的实验研究[J]环境与健康杂志，1986，3(5)：9
[25]戚继忠 由士江． 园林树木净菌作用及其主要影响因子．中国园林，2000，(4)：74—75
[26]邵海荣 贺庆棠：森林与空气负离子，世界林业研究，2000，10(5)19-23
[27]邵海荣 贺庆棠，．森林与空气负离子，[J]世界林业研究，2000，13(5)：19-23．
[28]石强 钟林生 吴楚材，森林环境中空气负离子浓度分级标准，中国环境科学2002，22(4)：320-323
[29]粟娟 谢德兴，珠海市板樟山森林公园休闲保健型森林营建德研究，林业科学研究，2001，14(5)496-502
[30]孙强 赵丽等，城市住宅区噪声污染及其综合防治．云南环境科学2001，20(1)：35-37
[31]万绪力朱应皋丁敏，国外生态旅游研究进展，旅游学刊，2002，2
[32]王军 傅伯杰 陈利顶，景观生态规划的原理和方法，资源科学 1999，3
[33]王敬明，林木与大气污染概论，北京，中国环境科学出版社，1989．28-30．
[34]王雁 陈鑫峰，心理物理学方法在国外森林景观评价中的应用，林业科学．1999，9，35(5)109-117
[35]吴楚材，论生态旅游资源的开发与建设，社会科学家，2000，7第15卷第4期
[36]吴楚材 郑群明 钟林生，森林游憩区空气负离子水平的研究，[J]．林业科学，2001，37(5)：75-81．
[37]吴焕忠，刘志武．住宅区绿化与空气质量关系的研究．中南林业调查规划2002，21(3)：56-57
[38]肖笃宁．景观生态学理论、方法及应用[M]．北京：中国林业出版社，1991．1-8
[39]肖水清等．15种优良阔叶树种生态学特性研究——叶面积指数、叶片生物量及滞水量的研究．2000(5)：1～9
[40]徐长松．空气维生素——阴离子．环境保护，1982(3)：23．
[41]薜效勤．疗养学．长春：吉林科学技术出版社，1987．63．
[42]杨尚英 穆婉红 张秦伟，朱雀森林公园气候的疗养避暑功能研究，西北林学院学报，2000，15(3)26-28
[43]余舒冰，梁景涛．空气细菌检验方法的探讨．中国公共卫生，1997，13(6)：328
[44]俞孔坚．景观敏感度及其阈值评价研究[J]．地理研究，1991，10(2)：38-51．
[45]俞孔坚，1986，自然风景景观评价方法，中国园林，3：38-40
[46]俞孔坚，论景观概念及其研究的发展，北京林业大学学报，1987，9(4)：433-438
[47]俞孔坚．自然风景质量评价研究——BIB—LCJ审美评判测量法．北京林业大学学报，1988，10(2)：1～11
[48]俞年生，张建民．公共场所中空气细菌总数的监测探讨．中国卫生检疫杂志，1997，7(1)：231
[49]郁东宁，王秀梅，马晓程．银川市区绿化减噪声效果的初步观察．宁夏农学院学报，1998，19(1)：75～78
[50]张继祥，刘克长，魏钦平，束怀瑞． 气象要素(气温、太阳辐射、风速和相对湿度)日变化进程的数理模拟．山东农业大学学报(自然科学版)，2002，33(2)：179～1 83
[51]张新献等．北京城市居住区绿地的滞尘效益．北京林业大学学报，1997，19(4)：12～17
[52]张一先，陈荣昭，董雪芳．城市大气环境质量比较评价分级方法[J]．中国环境科学，1997，17(4)：40-42．
[53]赵保路．氧自由基和天然抗氧化剂．北京：科学出版社，1999．6．
[54]钟林生，吴楚材，肖笃宁．森林旅游资源评价中的空气负离子研究[J]．生态学杂志，1998，17(6)：56-60
[55]Anderson L M. Land use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in forestland scapes For. Sci., 1981,27(2 ):392-400
[56]Arthur L M. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments: some empirical tests. For. Sci. 1977, 23 (2):151-160
[57]Benson RE et al. Attaining visual quality objectives in timber harvest areas—landscape
architects' evaluation. USDA For Serv Res Pap INT 348 7 p . 1985
[58] Blackwood L G. The application of standard normal logarithm transformation in statistics [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1995,35(1):55-75.
[59] Box G P, Cox D R J. Box-Cox commutation [J]. Royal Statistical Society Series B, 1964,21(3):211-243.
[60] Briggs DJ. Landscape evaluation : Acomparative study .J. Environ. Manage, 1980,10:263-375
[61] Brown TC, Daniel TC. Predicting scenic beauty of timber stands. For. Sci., 1986 , 32 (2):471-487
[62] BrushRO. The attractiveness of wood lands: perceptions of forest land owners in Massachusetts For. Sci., 1979, 25(3 ):495-506
[63] Buhyoff GJ et al. Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements.For. Sci., 1984, 30 (1):71-82
[64] Buhyoff GJ et al. Prediction of scenic quality for southern pine stands. For. Sci., 1986,32 (3):769-778
[65] Buhyoff GJ et al. Replication of a scenic preference function. For. Sci, 1980, 2 6:227-230
[66] Buhyoff GJ, Leuschner WA .Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. For.Sci., 1978, 2 4:42 4-432
[67] Buhyoff GJ, Wellman JD. Landscaper preference mentrics: Aninternational comparison .J. Environ. Manage, 1983,16:181-190
[68] Buhyoff GJet al. Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas, 1982,2 8(4):827-838
[69] Buhyoff, G.J., Leuschner, W.A. and Amdt,1980,Replication of a scenic preference function, Forest Sci.,26:227-230.
[70] Buhyoff, G.J., Wellman,J,D. and Daniel,T.C.,1982,Predicting scenic beauty for Mountain Pine Beetle and Western Spruce Budworm damaged forest vistas,Forest Sci.,28:827-823.
[71] Buhyoff, G.J.and Leuschner, W.A.1978,Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. Forest Sci.,24:424-432.
[72] Canada, Province of British Columbia Ministry of Forests ,1981,Forest Landscape Handbook, Published by the Information Service Branch, Ministry of Forests.
[73] Daniel TC, Boster.RS. Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. USDA forest Serv Res Pap RM-167,66p
[74] Daniel,T.C.and Schroeder, H.W.,1979,Scenic beauty estimation model ,predicting perceived beauty of forest landscapes. In the Proceedings of Our National Landscape(USDA Forest Service Tech. Rep. PSW-35).Berkeley, Calif.: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.514- 523.
[75] Daniel,T.C.and Vining, J.,1983,Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality.In Behavior and Natureal Environment,Vol.6,Altman ,I.Whohlowill, J.F.(Eds).New York, Plenum Press.39-84.
[76] Douglass RW. Forest Recreation. 3rded. Pergamon Press. 1982
[77] Hull IV RB et al. Measurement of scenic beauty: the law of comparative judgment and scenic beauty estimation procedures. For. Sci, 1984, 30(4): 1084-1096
[78] Hull IVRB, Buhyoff GJ.The scenic beauty temporal distribution method: An attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts. For. Sci, 1986,32 (2):271-286
[79] Jackson RH et al. Assessment of the environmental impact of high voltage power transmission
lines.J.Environ. Manage, 1978, 6 : 153-170
[80] Jensen FS. Landscape manager's and politicians' perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the population. For. Landsc.Res, 1993,1:79-93
[81] Kaplan,S.,1975,An informal model for the prediction of preference, In Landscape Assessment, Values, Perceptions, and Resources. Zube, E.H., Brush, R.O. and Fabos, J.G.(Eds). Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross Stroudsourg, PA. 92-102.
[82] Kaplan,S. 1979,Perception and landscape, conception and misconception In The Proceedings of Our National Landscape (USDA Forest Service Tech. Rep. Psw-35). Berkeley, Calf.: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.241-248.
[83] Kaplan, S.and Kaplan,R.,1982,Cognition and Environment; Functioning in An Uncertain World, Praeger, New York.252.
[84] Kreimer A. Environmental preferences: A critical analysis of some research method ologies.j.LeisureRes, 1977, 9:88-77
[85] Lowental,D. 1975,Past time, present place ,landscape and memory.Geogr, Rev.,65:1-36.
[86] Lowental,D.1977,The bicentennial landscape, a mirror held up to the past. Geogr. Rev. 67:249-267.
[87] PaquetJ,BelangerL. Public acceptability thresholds of clear cutting to maintain visual quality of boreal balsam fir landscapes. For. Sci., 1997, 43(1 ):46--55
[88] Rocky Mtn Forest and Range Exp Stn, Fort Collins, Colo, 1976
[89] Rudis VAetal. Forest inventory and management-based visual preference models of southern pine stands.For.Sci., 1988 34(4):846-863
[90] Shafer EL et al. Natural landscape pepreferences: Apredictive model.J.LeisureRes, 1969, 1 : 1-19
[91] Shuttle worths. The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. J.Environ. Manage., 1980, 11:61-76
[92] Ulrich,R.S.,1977,Visual landscape preference, a model and application, Man-Environment Systems 7(5):297-293.
[93] Ulrich,R.S., 1983,Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment, In Behavior and The Natural Environment. Altman. I. and Whohlwill,J.F.(Eds).New York,Plenum.85-125.
[94] United States Forest Service. National forest landscape management .V2,Chapter5:Timber.Wash.D.C. 1980
[95] USDA FS 1976,National Forest Landscape Management ,Vol.2,Chapter3 USA. For. Agricultural Handbook.No.484.
[96] USDA SCS 1978,Procedure to Establish Priorities in landscape. TR-65.Washington,D.C.20250.
[97] USDIBLM 1986,Visual Resource Management: Visual Resource Contrast Rating. BLM Manual Handbook 8431-1.
[2]蔡宏道 现代环境卫生学．北京：人民卫生出版社，1995．870．
[3]陈鑫峰，王雁．森林景观的定量评价和经营技术研究现状．世界林业研究，2000，13(5)31—38
[4]崔凤军《风景旅游区的保护与管理》中国旅游出版社
[5]但新球 龚艳 森林景观设计的心理学基础，中南林业调查规划，2000，3
[6]但新球 龚艳 现代森林景观设计美学原则，中南林业调查规划，2000，5
[7]但新球 姜海湘，森林浴场的规划设计探讨，中南林业调查规划，1999，8第18卷第3期
[8]但新球，森林公园的疗养保健功能及在规划中的应用，中南林业调查研究，1994，1
[9]方开泰 马长兴，正交设计的最新发展和应用，数理统计与管理1999，1，44—49
[10]黄建武，陶家元，空气负离子资源开发与生态旅游，华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)2002，6(2)257—260
[11]黄绳纪 空气离子与环境[J]广东环境科学，1999(1)：43
[12]李安伯 加快制订生产环境中空气离子卫生标准的步伐[J]中华劳动卫生职业病杂志，1984，2(5)：296
[13]李安伯，．加快制定空气离子卫生标准．中华劳动卫生与职业病，1984，2(5)：297．
[14]李安伯，我国空气负离子生物效应的研究，辐射与环境生物物理研究，中国科学技术出版社，1992，59-63
[15]李辉 赵卫智，北京5种草坪地被植物生态效益的研究．中国园林，1998,4：36～387
[16]林策良 陈斌，充分发挥水在城市建设中的作用．科学中国人，2000(7)：9．
[17]林忠宁，空气负离子在卫生保健中的作用，[J]生态科学，1999,6(2)87-90
[18]刘福才等，城市绿地绿化环境效益的研究．中国园林，1986，2：10～116
[19]刘振礼王兵，．新编中国旅游地理．天津：南开大学出版社，1996．109．
[20]卢云亭，．现代旅游地理．南京：江苏人民出版社，1988．379．
[21]卢云亭，自然景观旅游生态系统的结构、功能和开发保护战略研究．北京：中国林业出版社，1991．488
[22]卢云亭 王建军，《生态旅游学》旅游教育出版社，2001
[23]吕忠义，森林公园总体规划理论与技术的探讨，华东森林经理，2000，1第14卷
[24]农钢，空调净化房间空气负离子变化和影响因素的实验研究[J]环境与健康杂志，1986，3(5)：9
[25]戚继忠 由士江． 园林树木净菌作用及其主要影响因子．中国园林，2000，(4)：74—75
[26]邵海荣 贺庆棠：森林与空气负离子，世界林业研究，2000，10(5)19-23
[27]邵海荣 贺庆棠，．森林与空气负离子，[J]世界林业研究，2000，13(5)：19-23．
[28]石强 钟林生 吴楚材，森林环境中空气负离子浓度分级标准，中国环境科学2002，22(4)：320-323
[29]粟娟 谢德兴，珠海市板樟山森林公园休闲保健型森林营建德研究，林业科学研究，2001，14(5)496-502
[30]孙强 赵丽等，城市住宅区噪声污染及其综合防治．云南环境科学2001，20(1)：35-37
[31]万绪力朱应皋丁敏，国外生态旅游研究进展，旅游学刊，2002，2
[32]王军 傅伯杰 陈利顶，景观生态规划的原理和方法，资源科学 1999，3
[33]王敬明，林木与大气污染概论，北京，中国环境科学出版社，1989．28-30．
[34]王雁 陈鑫峰，心理物理学方法在国外森林景观评价中的应用，林业科学．1999，9，35(5)109-117
[35]吴楚材，论生态旅游资源的开发与建设，社会科学家，2000，7第15卷第4期
[36]吴楚材 郑群明 钟林生，森林游憩区空气负离子水平的研究，[J]．林业科学，2001，37(5)：75-81．
[37]吴焕忠，刘志武．住宅区绿化与空气质量关系的研究．中南林业调查规划2002，21(3)：56-57
[38]肖笃宁．景观生态学理论、方法及应用[M]．北京：中国林业出版社，1991．1-8
[39]肖水清等．15种优良阔叶树种生态学特性研究——叶面积指数、叶片生物量及滞水量的研究．2000(5)：1～9
[40]徐长松．空气维生素——阴离子．环境保护，1982(3)：23．
[41]薜效勤．疗养学．长春：吉林科学技术出版社，1987．63．
[42]杨尚英 穆婉红 张秦伟，朱雀森林公园气候的疗养避暑功能研究，西北林学院学报，2000，15(3)26-28
[43]余舒冰，梁景涛．空气细菌检验方法的探讨．中国公共卫生，1997，13(6)：328
[44]俞孔坚．景观敏感度及其阈值评价研究[J]．地理研究，1991，10(2)：38-51．
[45]俞孔坚，1986，自然风景景观评价方法，中国园林，3：38-40
[46]俞孔坚，论景观概念及其研究的发展，北京林业大学学报，1987，9(4)：433-438
[47]俞孔坚．自然风景质量评价研究——BIB—LCJ审美评判测量法．北京林业大学学报，1988，10(2)：1～11
[48]俞年生，张建民．公共场所中空气细菌总数的监测探讨．中国卫生检疫杂志，1997，7(1)：231
[49]郁东宁，王秀梅，马晓程．银川市区绿化减噪声效果的初步观察．宁夏农学院学报，1998，19(1)：75～78
[50]张继祥，刘克长，魏钦平，束怀瑞． 气象要素(气温、太阳辐射、风速和相对湿度)日变化进程的数理模拟．山东农业大学学报(自然科学版)，2002，33(2)：179～1 83
[51]张新献等．北京城市居住区绿地的滞尘效益．北京林业大学学报，1997，19(4)：12～17
[52]张一先，陈荣昭，董雪芳．城市大气环境质量比较评价分级方法[J]．中国环境科学，1997，17(4)：40-42．
[53]赵保路．氧自由基和天然抗氧化剂．北京：科学出版社，1999．6．
[54]钟林生，吴楚材，肖笃宁．森林旅游资源评价中的空气负离子研究[J]．生态学杂志，1998，17(6)：56-60
[55]Anderson L M. Land use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in forestland scapes For. Sci., 1981,27(2 ):392-400
[56]Arthur L M. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments: some empirical tests. For. Sci. 1977, 23 (2):151-160
[57]Benson RE et al. Attaining visual quality objectives in timber harvest areas—landscape
architects' evaluation. USDA For Serv Res Pap INT 348 7 p . 1985
[58] Blackwood L G. The application of standard normal logarithm transformation in statistics [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1995,35(1):55-75.
[59] Box G P, Cox D R J. Box-Cox commutation [J]. Royal Statistical Society Series B, 1964,21(3):211-243.
[60] Briggs DJ. Landscape evaluation : Acomparative study .J. Environ. Manage, 1980,10:263-375
[61] Brown TC, Daniel TC. Predicting scenic beauty of timber stands. For. Sci., 1986 , 32 (2):471-487
[62] BrushRO. The attractiveness of wood lands: perceptions of forest land owners in Massachusetts For. Sci., 1979, 25(3 ):495-506
[63] Buhyoff GJ et al. Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements.For. Sci., 1984, 30 (1):71-82
[64] Buhyoff GJ et al. Prediction of scenic quality for southern pine stands. For. Sci., 1986,32 (3):769-778
[65] Buhyoff GJ et al. Replication of a scenic preference function. For. Sci, 1980, 2 6:227-230
[66] Buhyoff GJ, Leuschner WA .Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. For.Sci., 1978, 2 4:42 4-432
[67] Buhyoff GJ, Wellman JD. Landscaper preference mentrics: Aninternational comparison .J. Environ. Manage, 1983,16:181-190
[68] Buhyoff GJet al. Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas, 1982,2 8(4):827-838
[69] Buhyoff, G.J., Leuschner, W.A. and Amdt,1980,Replication of a scenic preference function, Forest Sci.,26:227-230.
[70] Buhyoff, G.J., Wellman,J,D. and Daniel,T.C.,1982,Predicting scenic beauty for Mountain Pine Beetle and Western Spruce Budworm damaged forest vistas,Forest Sci.,28:827-823.
[71] Buhyoff, G.J.and Leuschner, W.A.1978,Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. Forest Sci.,24:424-432.
[72] Canada, Province of British Columbia Ministry of Forests ,1981,Forest Landscape Handbook, Published by the Information Service Branch, Ministry of Forests.
[73] Daniel TC, Boster.RS. Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. USDA forest Serv Res Pap RM-167,66p
[74] Daniel,T.C.and Schroeder, H.W.,1979,Scenic beauty estimation model ,predicting perceived beauty of forest landscapes. In the Proceedings of Our National Landscape(USDA Forest Service Tech. Rep. PSW-35).Berkeley, Calif.: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.514- 523.
[75] Daniel,T.C.and Vining, J.,1983,Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality.In Behavior and Natureal Environment,Vol.6,Altman ,I.Whohlowill, J.F.(Eds).New York, Plenum Press.39-84.
[76] Douglass RW. Forest Recreation. 3rded. Pergamon Press. 1982
[77] Hull IV RB et al. Measurement of scenic beauty: the law of comparative judgment and scenic beauty estimation procedures. For. Sci, 1984, 30(4): 1084-1096
[78] Hull IVRB, Buhyoff GJ.The scenic beauty temporal distribution method: An attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts. For. Sci, 1986,32 (2):271-286
[79] Jackson RH et al. Assessment of the environmental impact of high voltage power transmission
lines.J.Environ. Manage, 1978, 6 : 153-170
[80] Jensen FS. Landscape manager's and politicians' perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the population. For. Landsc.Res, 1993,1:79-93
[81] Kaplan,S.,1975,An informal model for the prediction of preference, In Landscape Assessment, Values, Perceptions, and Resources. Zube, E.H., Brush, R.O. and Fabos, J.G.(Eds). Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross Stroudsourg, PA. 92-102.
[82] Kaplan,S. 1979,Perception and landscape, conception and misconception In The Proceedings of Our National Landscape (USDA Forest Service Tech. Rep. Psw-35). Berkeley, Calf.: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.241-248.
[83] Kaplan, S.and Kaplan,R.,1982,Cognition and Environment; Functioning in An Uncertain World, Praeger, New York.252.
[84] Kreimer A. Environmental preferences: A critical analysis of some research method ologies.j.LeisureRes, 1977, 9:88-77
[85] Lowental,D. 1975,Past time, present place ,landscape and memory.Geogr, Rev.,65:1-36.
[86] Lowental,D.1977,The bicentennial landscape, a mirror held up to the past. Geogr. Rev. 67:249-267.
[87] PaquetJ,BelangerL. Public acceptability thresholds of clear cutting to maintain visual quality of boreal balsam fir landscapes. For. Sci., 1997, 43(1 ):46--55
[88] Rocky Mtn Forest and Range Exp Stn, Fort Collins, Colo, 1976
[89] Rudis VAetal. Forest inventory and management-based visual preference models of southern pine stands.For.Sci., 1988 34(4):846-863
[90] Shafer EL et al. Natural landscape pepreferences: Apredictive model.J.LeisureRes, 1969, 1 : 1-19
[91] Shuttle worths. The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. J.Environ. Manage., 1980, 11:61-76
[92] Ulrich,R.S.,1977,Visual landscape preference, a model and application, Man-Environment Systems 7(5):297-293.
[93] Ulrich,R.S., 1983,Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment, In Behavior and The Natural Environment. Altman. I. and Whohlwill,J.F.(Eds).New York,Plenum.85-125.
[94] United States Forest Service. National forest landscape management .V2,Chapter5:Timber.Wash.D.C. 1980
[95] USDA FS 1976,National Forest Landscape Management ,Vol.2,Chapter3 USA. For. Agricultural Handbook.No.484.
[96] USDA SCS 1978,Procedure to Establish Priorities in landscape. TR-65.Washington,D.C.20250.
[97] USDIBLM 1986,Visual Resource Management: Visual Resource Contrast Rating. BLM Manual Handbook 8431-1.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |