中国土地利用分区管制改革研究
摘要
改革是当今中国的时代最强音,而土地制度改革则是其中的热点和难点。而作为政府对于土地的三大公权力之一,土地利用管制制度的改革在其中具有重要的地位,因而也具有特殊的研究价值。然而,在现状杂糅“怪胎”的困惑矛盾中,中国土地利用管制制度改革首先面临朝哪个方向努力的问题。
在中国目前国情特征下,由于通则式的分区管制模式与个案式的规划许可模式相比更有利于削减政府职员的腐败机会、遏制政府违法用地行为、提高政府服务公平程度、增强市场经济活力、促进社会稳定等,本文倡导以成熟的“分区管制”模式为中国土地利用管制的改革方向。由此,本文选择以“中国土地利用分区管制改革研究”为论题展开深入系统的分析探讨。
本文研究的中心问题是,如何在规划管制制度现状和国内外实践经验借鉴的基础上,以科学化、法治化、公平优先、效率兼顾为价值导向,建立起成熟的中国特色土地利用分区管制体系。针对这一问题,本文的研究思路和内容如下：
(1)首先,总结评述国内外分区管制实践特征的基础上,描绘出中国分区管制改革的理想愿景,为后文研究确立目标。
(2)其次,在借鉴已有研究建立分区管制分析框架基础上,论证设计了“理论认知深化-制度环境改善-治理政策改进-方法技术支撑-分区管制规则重建”的改革行动路线,为后文研究确立逻辑。
在以上改革的愿景描绘和路线设计基础上,为推进中国分区管制改革进程走向深入,本文继而进行了如下研究：
(3)分区管制理论认知的深化,从土地利用规划分区和土地利用管制两个方面创新性地论述和阐明分区管制的科学内涵、外延构成和理论依据。
(4)中国分区管制的制度环境改革,着重从根本宪政制度、基本地权制度、空间规划体系三个方面论述中国分区管制制度环境的现状、问题及改善。
(5)中国分区管制的治理政策改革,着重从规划分区体系和分区管制权力两个方面论述中国分区管制治理政策的现状、问题与改进。
(6)中国分区管制改革的方法技术支撑,着重论述了中国分区管制改革中需要解决的科学规划分类系统的构建、科学规划分区系统的构建、全面深入划区定界的措施三个关键问题。
(7)中国分区管制规则的重建,在现状及问题分析的基础上,着重从程序性规则和实质性规则两个方面论述中国分区管制规则的重构。
通过以上系统的论证和阐述,本文在中国土地利用管制改革的模式选择、国内外分区管制的实践特征和优缺点分析、分区管制改革的愿景描绘和路线设计、分区管制的理论认知、分区管制制度环境和治理政策的分析与优化、规划分类和规划分区系统的科学构建、程序性和实质性分区管制规则的重建等方面做出了创新性的贡献。然而,时间、篇幅和水平等多方面的制约使本文仍存有诸多不足之处,但毕竟在诸多方面进行了探索性研究,未来可以继续地对相关内容进行丰富和深化。
Reform is the strongest voice of today's China, and land institution reform is one of the hot and difficult. As one of the three public powers on land, land-use regulation reform has an important position, and thus has a special value for research. However, based the current intermixed "freak", land use regulation reform firstly faces the problem of which way to go.
Under the condition of China's national characteristics, compared with case-style permission model, rule-style zoning mode outstands by reducing the corruption opportunities for government employees, curbing the illegal use of land by government, improving the fairness of government services, enhancing the vitality of the market economy, and promoting social stability and other advantages. Thus, this paper choses "land use zoning reform China" as the topic, which is explored in depth and systematically.
Based on current regulation conditions and practice experiences, the central issue of this paper is how to establish a mature Chinese land use zoning system, value-oriented by scientific-ness, rule-ness, fairness, and efficiency. To solve this problem, this paper gives the research as follows.
(1) First, on the basis of the practical zoning characteristics'analysis, the ideal vision of China's land use zoning reform is depicted, to set goals for later research.
(2) Second, on the basis of the establishment of analytic framework, the action route of China's land use zoning reform is designed, to establish later research logic.
To push forward the reform process, after the above-mentioned vision description and route design, this article then carries on the following studies.
(3) In perspective of land use planned regionalization and land use regulation, land use zoning's theoretical cognition is deepened, on scientific connotation, epitaxial composition, and theoretical basis.
(4) The situation, problems and improvement of land use zoning's environmental institutions is analyzed in-depth, focusing on fundamental constitutional institution, land properties arrangements, and space planning system.
(5) The situation, problems and betterness of land use zoning's governing policies is analyzed in-depth, focusing on planned regionalization system and zoning powers.
(6) Land use zoning's methodology and technical support is explored in detail, including the scientific construction of planned classification units and planed regionalization units, as well as comprehensive zoning delimitation.
(7) Based on the analysis of the current situation and problems, land use zoning rules'reconstruction is expounded, including procedural rules and substantive rules.
Through the above argumentation and elaboration, this article contributes innovatively in the following areas:model selection of China's land use reform, characteristics and advantages and disadvantages of the zoning practices, vision description and route design of China's land use zoning reform, analysis and optimization of land use zoning's environmental institutions and governing policies, scientific construction of planned classification units and planed regionalization units, reconstruction of substantive and procedural zoning rules, et al. However, there is still many inadequacies attributed to time, space or ability's constraints. But, exploratory research in many ways is given after all, and related content can be continued in the future to enrich and deepen.
在中国目前国情特征下,由于通则式的分区管制模式与个案式的规划许可模式相比更有利于削减政府职员的腐败机会、遏制政府违法用地行为、提高政府服务公平程度、增强市场经济活力、促进社会稳定等,本文倡导以成熟的“分区管制”模式为中国土地利用管制的改革方向。由此,本文选择以“中国土地利用分区管制改革研究”为论题展开深入系统的分析探讨。
本文研究的中心问题是,如何在规划管制制度现状和国内外实践经验借鉴的基础上,以科学化、法治化、公平优先、效率兼顾为价值导向,建立起成熟的中国特色土地利用分区管制体系。针对这一问题,本文的研究思路和内容如下：
(1)首先,总结评述国内外分区管制实践特征的基础上,描绘出中国分区管制改革的理想愿景,为后文研究确立目标。
(2)其次,在借鉴已有研究建立分区管制分析框架基础上,论证设计了“理论认知深化-制度环境改善-治理政策改进-方法技术支撑-分区管制规则重建”的改革行动路线,为后文研究确立逻辑。
在以上改革的愿景描绘和路线设计基础上,为推进中国分区管制改革进程走向深入,本文继而进行了如下研究：
(3)分区管制理论认知的深化,从土地利用规划分区和土地利用管制两个方面创新性地论述和阐明分区管制的科学内涵、外延构成和理论依据。
(4)中国分区管制的制度环境改革,着重从根本宪政制度、基本地权制度、空间规划体系三个方面论述中国分区管制制度环境的现状、问题及改善。
(5)中国分区管制的治理政策改革,着重从规划分区体系和分区管制权力两个方面论述中国分区管制治理政策的现状、问题与改进。
(6)中国分区管制改革的方法技术支撑,着重论述了中国分区管制改革中需要解决的科学规划分类系统的构建、科学规划分区系统的构建、全面深入划区定界的措施三个关键问题。
(7)中国分区管制规则的重建,在现状及问题分析的基础上,着重从程序性规则和实质性规则两个方面论述中国分区管制规则的重构。
通过以上系统的论证和阐述,本文在中国土地利用管制改革的模式选择、国内外分区管制的实践特征和优缺点分析、分区管制改革的愿景描绘和路线设计、分区管制的理论认知、分区管制制度环境和治理政策的分析与优化、规划分类和规划分区系统的科学构建、程序性和实质性分区管制规则的重建等方面做出了创新性的贡献。然而,时间、篇幅和水平等多方面的制约使本文仍存有诸多不足之处,但毕竟在诸多方面进行了探索性研究,未来可以继续地对相关内容进行丰富和深化。
Reform is the strongest voice of today's China, and land institution reform is one of the hot and difficult. As one of the three public powers on land, land-use regulation reform has an important position, and thus has a special value for research. However, based the current intermixed "freak", land use regulation reform firstly faces the problem of which way to go.
Under the condition of China's national characteristics, compared with case-style permission model, rule-style zoning mode outstands by reducing the corruption opportunities for government employees, curbing the illegal use of land by government, improving the fairness of government services, enhancing the vitality of the market economy, and promoting social stability and other advantages. Thus, this paper choses "land use zoning reform China" as the topic, which is explored in depth and systematically.
Based on current regulation conditions and practice experiences, the central issue of this paper is how to establish a mature Chinese land use zoning system, value-oriented by scientific-ness, rule-ness, fairness, and efficiency. To solve this problem, this paper gives the research as follows.
(1) First, on the basis of the practical zoning characteristics'analysis, the ideal vision of China's land use zoning reform is depicted, to set goals for later research.
(2) Second, on the basis of the establishment of analytic framework, the action route of China's land use zoning reform is designed, to establish later research logic.
To push forward the reform process, after the above-mentioned vision description and route design, this article then carries on the following studies.
(3) In perspective of land use planned regionalization and land use regulation, land use zoning's theoretical cognition is deepened, on scientific connotation, epitaxial composition, and theoretical basis.
(4) The situation, problems and improvement of land use zoning's environmental institutions is analyzed in-depth, focusing on fundamental constitutional institution, land properties arrangements, and space planning system.
(5) The situation, problems and betterness of land use zoning's governing policies is analyzed in-depth, focusing on planned regionalization system and zoning powers.
(6) Land use zoning's methodology and technical support is explored in detail, including the scientific construction of planned classification units and planed regionalization units, as well as comprehensive zoning delimitation.
(7) Based on the analysis of the current situation and problems, land use zoning rules'reconstruction is expounded, including procedural rules and substantive rules.
Through the above argumentation and elaboration, this article contributes innovatively in the following areas:model selection of China's land use reform, characteristics and advantages and disadvantages of the zoning practices, vision description and route design of China's land use zoning reform, analysis and optimization of land use zoning's environmental institutions and governing policies, scientific construction of planned classification units and planed regionalization units, reconstruction of substantive and procedural zoning rules, et al. However, there is still many inadequacies attributed to time, space or ability's constraints. But, exploratory research in many ways is given after all, and related content can be continued in the future to enrich and deepen.
引文
[I]Acemoglu Daron, Cantoni Davide, Johnson Simon, et al. The Consequences of Radical Reform:The French Revolution. American Economic Review,2011,101 (7):3286-3307.
[2]Allan Gregory. The seven lies of zoning, http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/zoning7lies.shtml. 2002-08-15.
[3]Asabere Paul K., Huffman Forrest E. Zoning and industrial land values:the case of Philadelphia. Real Estate Economics,1991,19(2):154-160.
[4]Atkinson Glen, Oleson Ted. Urban Sprawl as a Path Dependent Process. Journal of economic issues,1996, XXX(2):609-615.
[5]Bartke Richard W., Lamb John S. Upzoning, Public Policy, and Fairness-A Study and Proposal. William and Mary Law Review,1976,17(4):701-736.
[6]Bassett Edward M. Zoning:the laws, administration, and court decisions during the first twenty years. New York:Russell Sage Foundation,1940:26.
[7]Berry Brian J. L. and Hankins T. D. A Bibliographic Guide to the Economic Regions of the United States. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, Department of Geography Research Paper, No.87,1963.
[8]Berry Brian J. L. Approaches to Regional Analysis:A Synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1964,54(1):2-11.
[9]Blackwell Robert J. Overlay Zoning, Performance Standards, and Environmental Protection After Nollan. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review,1989,16(3):615-659.
[10]Buchanan James McGill, Tullock Gordon. The Calculus of Consent:Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,1962.
[11]Coase Ronald H. The Nature of the Firm. Economica,1937,4(16):386-405.
[12]Coase Ronald H. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics,1960,3 (1): 1-44.
[13]Coddmgton Alan. Creaking Semaphore and Beyond:A Consideration of Shackle's 'Epistemics and Economies'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,1975,26(2):152-163.
[14]Crecine John P., Davis Otto A. & Jackson John E. Urban Property Markets:Some Empirical Results and Their Implications for Municipal Zoning. Journal of Law and Economics,1967,10: 79-99.
[15]Deaton B. James, Hoehn John P., Norris Patricia E. Net Buyers, Net Sellers, and Agricultural Landowner Support for Agricultural Zoning. Land Economics,2007,83(2):153-165.
[16]Ellickson Robert C. Alternatives to Zoning:Covenants, Nuisance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls. The University of Chicago Law Review,1973,40(4):681-781.
[17]Elliott Donald L. A better way to zone:ten principles to create more livable cities. Washington D.C.:Island Press,2008.
[18]Epstein Richard A. Takings:Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain, Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1985:362.
[19]Evans Tim. Large-Lot Zoning Responsible for Rapid Loss of Open Lands. http://www.njfuture.org/news/op-ed-articles/large-lot-zonin/,2011-06-31.
[20]Fernandez Raquel, Rogerson Richard. Keeping people out:income distribution, zoning and the quality of public education.International Economic Review,1997,38(1):23-42.
[21]Fischel William A. A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning. Land Economics,1978, 54(1):64-81.
[22]Fischel William A. Exclusionary zoning and growth controls:a comment on the APA's endorsement of the Mount Laurel Doctrine. Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law,1991,40: 65-73.
[23]Fischel William A. Externalities and Zoning. Public Choice,1980,35(1):37-43.
[24]Fischel William A. The Economics of Zoning Laws:A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1985:274-279.
[25]Fischel William A. Zoning and land use regulation. http://www.dartmouth.edu/-wfischel/Papers/WAF-zoning%20ELEpdf.pdf,1999.
[26]Frazier Bart. Zoning's attack on liberty and property, http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0610d.asp 2007-02-02.
[27]Frederickson George H. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1996.(中译本：张成福等译.公共行政的精神.北京：中国人民大学出版社,2009)
[28]Garkovich Lori. Effects of Zoning on Rural Land. http://www.slidefinder.net/e/effects zoning rural land lori/pp3garkovich-b/9713128. 2003-12-01.
[29]Giddens Anthony. The constitution of society-outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford: Polity Press,1984(中译本：李康、李猛译,社会的构成：结构化理论大纲.北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998)
[30]Grant Jill. Mixed Use in Theory and Practice:Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle. Journal of the American Planning Association,2002,68(1):71-84.
[31]Grice Andrew. Whitehall'needs radical reform'to avoid a crisis. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/whitehall-needs-radical-reform-to-avoid-a-crisis-7 536447.html.2012-03-05.
[32]Grieson Ronald E. And White James R. The Effects of Zoning on Structure and Land Markets. Journal of the Urban Economics,1981,10:271-285.
[33]Grigg David. The Logic of Regional Systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1965,55(3):465-491.
[34]Guttenberg Albert Z. Regionalization as a Symbolic Process. Canadian Journal of Regional Science,1988,10(3):373-392.
[35]Guttenberg Albert Z. Toward a Behavioral Theory of Regionalization. Theories and Models of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space. Pisa:Springer-Verlag,1992,639:110-121.
[36]Hall Ola & Arnberg Wolter. A Method for Landscape Regionalization Based on Fuzzy Membership Signature. Landscape and Urban Planning,2002,59(4):227-240.
[37]Hartshorne Richard. The Nature of Geography:A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1939,29(3):173-412.
[38]Hartshorne Richard. The Nature of Geography:A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past (Conclusion). Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1939,29(4): 413-658.
[39]Hayek Friedrich A. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1960.
[40]Hecke M. T. Zoning Ordinances and Restrictions in Deeds. The Yale Law Journal,1928, 37(4):407-425.
[41]Hengera R. & Bizera K. Tradable planning permits for land-use control in Germany. Land Use Policy,2010,27:843-852.
[42]Henneberry David M. and Barrows Richard L. Capitalization of Exclusive Agricultural Zoning into Farmland Prices. Land Economics,1990,66(3):249-258.
[43]Hirsch Werner Z. The Efficiency of Restrictive Land Use Instruments. Land Economics, 1977,53(2):145-156.
[44]International City/County Management Association (ICMA) & American Planning Association (APA). The Practice of Local Government Planning. Washington D. C.:ICMA,2000.(中译本：张永刚等译.地方政府的规划实践-原著第三版.北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2006)
[45]ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). An Overview of Land Use Control Management Systems, BRNFLD-3. Washington D. C.:Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Brownfields Team, www.itrcweb.org,2008.
[46]James Franklin J. & Windsor Oliver Duane. Fiscal Zoning, Fiscal Reform, and Exclusionary Land Use Controls. Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1976,42(2):130-141.
[47]Johnston R. J. Classification in geography. Concepts and techniques in modern geography 6. Norwich:Environmental Publications,1976. http://qmrg.org.uk/files/2008/11/6-classification-in-geography.pdf,2008-11-06.
[48]Johnston Robert A., Schwartz Seymour I., Wandesforde-Smith Geoffrey A., et al. Selling Zoning:Do Density Bonus Incentives for Moderate-Cost Housing Work. Washington University Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law,1989,65(1):1-12.
[49]Joint Economic Planning Committee (JEPC) of the Medina County. Land Use Compatibility Study. http://www.planning.co.medina.oh.us/JEPC%20Study/Land%20Use%20Compatibility%20Study report.pdf.2004-09-28.
[50]Jud G. Donald. The Effects of Zoning on Single-Family Residential Property Values: Charlotte, North Carolina. Land Economics,1980,56(2):142-154.
[51]Karkkainen Bradley C. Zoning:a reply to the critics. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law,1994,10(1):2-46.
[52]Kautz Barbara Ehrlich. In Defense of Inclusionary Zoning:Successfully Creating Affordable Housing. University of San Francisco Law Review,2002,36:971-1032.
[53]Kenneth Lieberthal(李侃如)Governing China:From Revolution Through Reform. New York:W. W. Norton & Company,2003(中文版,胡国成、赵梅译,治理中国：从革命到改革.北京：中国社会科学出版社,2010)
[54]Lai L. W C. Property rights justifications for planning and a theory of zoning. Progress in Planning,1997,48(3):161-245.
[55]Lai L. W. C. The Economics of Land Use Zoning:A Literature Review an Analysis of the Work of Coase. Town Planning Review,1994,64:77-79.
[56]Lai W. C. The economics of land-use zoning:a literature review and analysis of the work of Coase. Town Planning Review,1994,65(1):77-98.
[57]Lenon Maryjane, Chattopadhyay Sajal K. & Heffley Dennis R. Zoning and Fiscal Interdependencies. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,1996,12(2):221-234.
[58]Lichtenberg Erik. Open Space and Urban Sprawl:The Effects of Zoning and Forest Conservation Regulations in Maryland. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,2011, 40(3):393-404.
[59]Makielski S. J. Zoning:Legal Theory and Political Practice. Journal of Urban Law,1967, 45:1-22.
[60]Mandelker Danime R. Land Use Takings:The Compensation Issue. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly,1980,8:491-516.
[61]Marcus Norman. Exclusionary zoning:the need for a regional planning context. New York Law Forum,1970,16:732-740.
[62]Mason Greg. The deregulation of urban land markets:a note on the alternatives to zoning. Annals of Regional Science,1979, (3):54-66.
[63]McLean Mary. Local Planning Administration (Third Ed). Chicago:The International City Managers'Association,1959.
[64]Miceli Thomas J. and Segerson Kathleen. Regulatory Takings:When Should Compensation be Paid? Journal of Legal Studies,1994,23(2):749-776.
[65]Miceli Thomas J. Optimal Fiscal Zoning That Distorts Housing Consumption. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,1992,5:323-331.
[66]Mills David E. Segregation, Rationing and Zoning. Southern Economic Journal,1979,45(4): 1195-1207.
[67]Morrisette Peter M. Conservation easements and the public good:preserving the environment on private lands. Natural Resources Journal,2001,41(2):373-426.
[68]Mueller Dennis C. Public Choice Ⅲ. Cambridge University Press,2003(中译本：杨春学等译.公共选择理论-第三版.北京：中国社会科学出版社,2010)
[69]New York City, http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/subcats/zoning.shtml,2013.
[70]North Douglass C. Institutional Change and Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic History,1971,31(1):118-125.
[71]North Douglass. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1990.
[72]Nuissla H. & Schlaack Christoph S. On the economic approach to the containment of land consumption. Environmental Science & Policy,2009,12(3):270-280.
[73]OECD. Economies in Transition:Structural Adjustment Experience in OECD Countries. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,1989.
[74]Ohls James C., Weisberg Richard Chadbourn, White Michelle J. The Effect of Zoning on Land Value. Journal of Urban Economics,1974, (1):428-444.
[75]OlsonMancur Lloyd. The Logic of Collective Action:Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1965.
[76]Osborne David, Gaebler Ted. Reinventing Government:How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York:Plume,1993(中译本：周敦仁等译.改革政府-企业家精神如何改革着公共部门.上海：上海译文出版社,2010)
[77]Ostrom Elinor, Gardner Roy & Walker James. Rules, Games, and Common Pool Resources. Ann Arbor:Michigan University Press,1994(中译本：王巧玲等译.规则、博弈与公共池塘资源.西安：陕西人民出版社,2011)
[78]Ostrom Elinor, Larry Schroeder, & Susan Wynne. Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development:Infrastructure Policies in Perspective. Boulder CO:Westview Press,1993(中译本：毛寿龙译.制度激励与可持续发展：基础设施政策透视.上海：上海三联书店,2000)
[79]Ostrom Elinor. A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action. American Political Science Review,1998,92(1):1-22.
[80]Peltzman Sam, Levine Michael E. & Noll Roger G. The economic theory of regulation after a decade of deregulation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity:Microeconomics,1989,1989: 1-41.
[81]Peltzman Sam. Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics,1976,19(2):211-240.
[82]Pogodzinski J. Michael & Sass Tim R. The Economic Theory of Zoning:A Critical Review. Land Economics,1990,66(3):294-314.
[83]Pruetz Rick. Beyond givings and takings:saving natural areas, farmland, and historic landmarks with transfer of development rights and density transfer charges. Los Angeles:Arje Press,2003.
[84]Ramadan Tariq. Radical reform:Islamic ethics and liberation. Oxford University Press,2008.
[85]Sayre Paul. Aesthetics and Property Values:Does Zoning Promote the Public Welfare? American Bar Association Journal,1948,35:471.
[86]Schill Michael H. Regulations and Housing Development:What We Know and What We Need to Know, http://www.huduser.org/rbc/pdf/regulations housing development.pdf,2004-05.
[87]Schmutz George L. Economic Effects of Zoning. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Part 2:Zoning in the United States,1931,155:172-177.
[88]Shenkel William M. The Economic Consequences of Industrial Zoning. Land Economics, 1964,40(3):255-265.
[89]Shrago Yevgeny. Anything Zoning Can Do, Covenants Can Do Too. Harvard law& policy review, http://hlpronline.com/2012/03/,2012-03-21.
[90]Siegan Bernard H. Non-Zoning in Houston. Journal of Law and Economics,1970,13(1): 71-147.
[91]Stigler George J. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,1971,2(1):3-21.
[92]Stockman Paul K. Anti-Snob Zoning in Massachusetts:Assessing One Attempt at Opening the Suburbs to Affordable Housing. Virginia Law Review,1992,78:535-580.
[93]Stoebuck William B. Police Power, Takings, and Due Process. Washington and Lee Law Review,1980,37(4):1057-1099.
[94]Toole Randal O. Land-Use Regulation Does Increase Income Inequality. http://www.cato.org/blog/yes-land-use-regulation-does-increase-income-inequality.2012-07-23.
[95]Turner Ⅱ B.L., Skole D., Sanderson S., et al. Land-use and land-cover change science/research plan. IGBP Report NO.35 and HDP Report No7. Stockholm:IGBP,1995.
[96]Wallace Nancy E. The Market Effects of Zoning Undeveloped Land:Does Zoning Follow the Market? Journal of Urban Economics 1988,2:301-326.
[97]Wang Shaoguang. Defective Institution and Its Consequences:The Institutional Roots of Central-Local Rivalry in China,1980-1993. http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/gpa/wang files/Roots.pdf 2000-02-05.
[98]Whatcom County Zoning Ordinance. http://www.co.whatcom.wa.us/pds/pdf/title20 revised308.pdf,2008-03.
[99]Wilkens Edward B. Impact of Rural Zoning on Agriculture. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/17343/1/ar560103.pdf.1956-01-03.
[100]Williamson O. E. The New Institutional Economics:Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature,2000,38(2):595-613.
[101]Witt Donald R. Progress in the Science of Zoning. Nebraska Law Review,1965,44(1): 151-179.
[102]Wolf Charles. A Theory of "non-market failure":framework for implementation analysis (first published in 1978). The Rand paper series, P-6034, http://130.154.3.14/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2006/P6034.pdf.2006.
[103]Wolf Charles. Market and Non-Market Failures:Comparison and Assessment. Journal of Public Policy,1987.7(1):43-70.
[104]Zuger William P. Exclusionary Zoning. North Dakota Law Review,1974,50:45-60.
[105][德]范伯格著,史世伟等译.经济学中的规则和选择.西安：陕西人民出版社,2011.
[106][德]哈特向(Hartshorne Richard)著,黎樵译.地理学性质的透视(原著1959).北京：商务印书馆,1996.
[107][德]赫特纳(Hettner Alfred)著,王兰生译.地理学——它的历史、性质和方法(原著1927年).北京：商务印书馆,1985.
[108][加]梁鹤年.人本思想与公共利益.国际城市规划,2008,22(1)：99-101.
[109][美]邦奇(Bunge William)著,石高玉、石高俊译.理论地理学(原著1962年)北京：商务印书馆,1991.
[110][苏]萨莫伊洛夫(ИВ СамойЛов)著,李恒译.自然区划方法论(作者1957年在北京的讲稿).北京：科学出版社,1957.
[111][苏]伊萨钦科(A.Г.ИсаЧенко)著,胡寿田译.今日地理学(原著1973年).北京：商务印书馆,1986.
[112][苏]伊萨钦科(A.Г.ИсаЧенко)著,中山大学地质地理系译.自然地理学原理(译自作者1957-1959年在中山大学、北京大学讲课的讲稿).北京：高等教育出版社,1965.
[113]蔡继明.土地管制不能依靠所有制歧视.http://money.163.com/12/0307/16/7S0PRP4300254O4Vall.html,2012-03-07.
[114]陈刚,刘欣葵,张瑾.美国地方政府的规划实践(之五).北京规划建设,2002,(5)：70-75.
[115]陈剑.政治体制改革应当从现有制度入手.http://www.21 ccom.net/articles/zgyi/ggcx/article 2012110970723.html,2012-11-09.
[116]陈利根.土地用途管制制度研究.南京农业大学博士学位论文,2000.
[117]程烨,王静,孟繁华.土地用途分区管制研究.北京：地质出版社,2003.
[118]丁维莉,章元.局部改革与公共政策效果的交互性和复杂性.经济研究,2009,(6)：28-39.
[119]董祚继,邓红蒂.建立适合中国国情的土地用途分区管制制度,土地用途管制与耕地保护.北京大学出版社,1997：98-104.
[120]杜钢建,刘杰.美国地方政府与地方自治.小城镇建设,2000,(3)：66-67.
[121]段正梁.关于土地科学中土地概念的一些思考.中国土地科学,2000,14(4)：18-21.
[122]樊纲.渐进改革的政治经济学分析.上海：上海远东出版社,1996.
[123]范树平,程久苗,程美琴,等.国内外土地利用分区研究概况与展望.广东土地科学,2009,8(4)：22-27.
[124]傅蔚冈.土地管制制度不改,违规征地难除http://think.sifl.org/?p=3206,2011-05-20.
[125]韩渊丰,张治勋,赵汝植.区域地理理论与方法.西安：陕西师范大学出版社,1999.
[126]郝春艳,黄明华.对城市总体规划中心城区空间管制分区的建议,生态文明视角下的城乡规划——2008中国城市规划年会论文集.大连：大连出版社,2008.
[127]何芳.土地利用规划.上海：百家出版社,1994.
[128]华闻周刊.刺激经济发展英国拟放松城市规划法.http://www.thechineseweekly.com/article.php?id=7825,2012-09-07.
[129]黄秉维.中国综合自然区划草案.科学通报,1959,(18)：594-602.
[130]霍宪森.中国政治体制改革的理论研究方法要尽快从书斋走向现实.http://www.aisixiang.com/data/detail.php?id5571,2005-01-25.
[131]纪大海.顶层设计与教育科学发展.中国教育学刊,2009,(9)：28-30.
[132]江平.法治中国需政治体制改革http://finance.qq.com/a/20120320/001947.htm, 2012-03-20.
[133]赖世刚.开发许可制与土地使用分区管制比较研究——从财产权与信息经济分析入手.规划师,2002,18(4)：64-66,70.
[134]李正国,王仰麟,张小飞,等.景观生态区划的理论研究.地理科学进展,2006,25(5)：10-20.
[135]燎原.林业局和国土局的“暗战”http://www.nfcmag.com/article/3846.html, 2013-01-23.
[136]林超.河北省及其附近地区自然区划工作的一些经验.地理学报,1960,26(1)：52-60.
[137]林毅夫.关于制度变迁的经济学理论：诱致性变迁与强制性变迁http://4a.hep.edu.cn/ncourse/ep/resource/part1/WE/18.htm,1994.
[138]刘飞.城乡规划的法律性质分析.国家行政学院学报,2009，(2)：45-48.
[139]刘国臻.土地利用分区管制论略.政法学刊,2003,20(5)：26-28.
[140]刘康.为什么要建立“城乡建设用地空间管制制度”.中国国土资源报,2008-11-28.
[141]刘守英.中国土地管制制度限制了农地流转.http://business.sohu.com/20100128/n269888628.shtml,2010-01-28.
[142]刘卫东.江汉平原土地类型与综合自然区划.地理学报,1994,49(1)：73-83.
[143]刘胤汉.土地类型与综合自然区划.西安：陕西师范大学地理系,1982.
[144]柳传志.中国企业家很软弱没勇气抗衡政府不当行为(原载于中国青年报)http://tech.ifeng.com/it/detail 201211/07/18914876 O.shtml,2012-11-07.
[145]卢现祥.我国的渐进式改革及其寻租问题.中南财经大学学报,1998,(5)：15-21.
[146]毛寿龙.坐而论道为公立学：公共管理与治道变革.北京：中国法制出版社,2008.
[147]孟旭光.国土资源规划理论与实践.北京：地质出版社,2009.
[148]倪绍祥.土地类型与土地评价(第二版).北京：高等教育出版社,1999：1-115.
[149]欧名豪.土地用途分区体系探讨.南京农业大学学报,2001,24(3)：111-116.
[150]彭小雷,苏洁琼,焦怡雪,等.城市总体规划中“四区”的划定方法研究.城市规划,2009,33(2)：56-61.
[151]戚聿东,柳学信.深化垄断行业改革的模式与路径：整体渐进改革观.中国工业经济,2008,(6)：44-55.
[152]曲福田.土地行政学.南京：江苏人民出版社,1997.
[153]石磊,李巍.河北省将大幅削减房地产开发审批并清理收费项目.http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2009-02/24/content 1240740.htm,2009-02-24.
[154]史舟,吴宏海,王人潮.空间分析技术和图论树算法在农业区划中的应用.中国图像图形学报,2000,5(3)：244-248.
[155]孙斌栋,王颖,郑正.城市总体规划中的空间区划与管制.城市发展研究,2007,14(3)：32-36.
[156]谭术魁,张孜仪.寻租行为在土地用途管制中的衍生路径及抑制.中国土地科学,2012,26(5)：76-81.
[157]汪秀莲,张建平.土地用途分区管制国际比较.中国土地科学,2001,15(4)：16-21.
[158]汪玉凯,竹立家.改革重点在于限制政府权力(原载于京华时报) http://news.163.com/12/1109/03/8FRCOJ8700014AED.html,2012-11-09.
[159]王超.关于土地类型结构及其与综合自然区划关系的初步探讨.地理科学,1994,6(2)：191-194.
[160]王静.关于我国县级土地用途管制分区类型的建议.中国土地科学,2001,15(4)：26-30.
[161]王万茂,严金明,韩桐魁,等.土地利用规划学.北京：中国大地出版社,1996.
[162]王向东,刘卫东.土地利用规划：公权力与私权利.中国土地科学,2012a,26(3)：34-40.
[163]王向东,刘卫东.土地利用规划：由概念和本质属性谈起.国土资源情报,2011,(10)：54-60.
[164]王向东,刘卫东.中国空间规划体系的现状、问题与重构.经济地理,2012b,32(5)：7-15.
[165]王小映,郑振源,盛洪,等.土地制度改革与修法建言.中国改革,2012,(3)：73-80,82.
[166]吴传钧,郭焕成.中国土地利用.北京：科学出版社,1994.
[167]吴传钧.土地和国土.经济地理,1982,(3)：221.
[168]吴殿廷,朱青.区域定量划分方法的初步研究——兼论用断裂点理论进行区域划分问题.北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,39(3)：412-416.
[169]吴殿廷.突变理论与自然区划,资源·环境·区域开发——青年地理工作者论文集.长春：吉林文史出版社,1986：29-33.
[170]吴敬琏.构筑竞争性市场体系.http://finance.ifeng.com/news/special/yb12013/20130222/7691965.shtml,2013-02-22.
[171]吴启焰.城市社会空间分异的研究领域及进展.城市规划汇刊,1999,(3)：23-26.
[172]伍光和,蔡运龙.综合自然地理学(第二版).北京：高等教育出版社,2004.
[173]西广成.生态经济区划的熵方法.自动化学报,1990,16(2)：170-173.
[174]晓冬.冲破思想观念的障碍、突破利益固化的藩篱：顶层设计理论框架设想.http://paper.people.com.cn/rmlt/html/2012-12/20/content_1163649.htm?div=-1,2012-12-20.
[175]新华网(转载之瞭望新闻周刊).规划编制的“三国演义”.http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2005-11/10/content_3757733.htm,2005-11-10.
[176]徐邓耀,税远友.论土地利用分区.四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),1996,17(2)：71-74.
[177]许牧.试论土地利用区划.经济地理,1982,(1)：18-21.
[178]杨勤业.自然地理区划研究,20世纪中国学术大典：地理学.福州：福建教育出版社,2002.
[179]杨仕省.房产项目开发需166个公章不合理盖章藏部门利益.http://finance.ifeng.com/news/house/20130202/7637481.shtml,2013-02-02.
[180]杨子生,郝性中.土地利用区划几个问题的探讨.云南大学学报(自然科学版),1995,17(4)：363-368.
[181]叶剑平,宋家宁.基于产权视角的中国土地问题探析.人民论坛学术前沿(总第321 期)http://www.rmlt.com.cn/News/201103/201103251105345999.html,2011-03-25.
[182]叶竹盛.法院：“数字化生存”的逻辑与异化(源于南风窗网.http://www.nfcmag.com/article/3813.html,2013-01-04.
[183]于猛,宁晶.全国违法占用耕地面积公路铁路超一半.人民日报,2011-03-24.
[184]袁烨城,周成虎,覃彪,等.多层次格网模型的近邻指数聚类生态区划算法与实验——以新疆北部地区区划为例.地球信息科学学报,2011,13(1)：1-11.
[185]宅斌.合肥市土地利用总体规划用地分区研究.华东经济管理,1996,(5)：13-15.
[186]张晓山.中国农村土地制度变革的回顾和展望.学习与探索,2006,(5)：172-179.
[187]张洋.论我国现行体制下司法权与行政权的制衡问题.http://www.zjfzb.gov.cn/il.htm?a=si&key=main/fzyj&id=5c3f755b2b483ac5012c3a09a99d0e82, 2010-11-11.
[188]赵松乔,陈传康,牛文元.近三十年来我国综合自然地理学的进展.地理学报,1979,34(3)：187-199.
[189]郑度,欧阳,周成虎.对自然地理区划方法的认识与思考.地理学报,2008,63(6)：563-573.
[190]郑伟元.制度创新：城乡建设用地空间管制,管制用途、规划空间——专家谈城乡建设用地空间管制制度.中国国土资源报,2009-03-27.
[191]郑文含.城镇体系规划中的区域空间管制.规划师,2005,21(3)：72-77.
[192]郑振源.土地制度改革要义.中国改革,2010,(10)：76-79.
[193]周剑云,戚冬瑾.我国城市用地分类的困境及改革建议.城市规划,2008,32(3)：45-49.
[194]周金星,魏远,漆良华,等.基于ISODATA法的三峡库区生态区划.长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(3)：446-450.
[195]周立三.中国农业区划的理论与实践.合肥：中国科技大学出版社,1993.
[196]周新民.人事制度改革“顶层设计”把握“六大模块”http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2013/0220/c148980-20545216.html,2013-02-20.
[2]Allan Gregory. The seven lies of zoning, http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/zoning7lies.shtml. 2002-08-15.
[3]Asabere Paul K., Huffman Forrest E. Zoning and industrial land values:the case of Philadelphia. Real Estate Economics,1991,19(2):154-160.
[4]Atkinson Glen, Oleson Ted. Urban Sprawl as a Path Dependent Process. Journal of economic issues,1996, XXX(2):609-615.
[5]Bartke Richard W., Lamb John S. Upzoning, Public Policy, and Fairness-A Study and Proposal. William and Mary Law Review,1976,17(4):701-736.
[6]Bassett Edward M. Zoning:the laws, administration, and court decisions during the first twenty years. New York:Russell Sage Foundation,1940:26.
[7]Berry Brian J. L. and Hankins T. D. A Bibliographic Guide to the Economic Regions of the United States. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, Department of Geography Research Paper, No.87,1963.
[8]Berry Brian J. L. Approaches to Regional Analysis:A Synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1964,54(1):2-11.
[9]Blackwell Robert J. Overlay Zoning, Performance Standards, and Environmental Protection After Nollan. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review,1989,16(3):615-659.
[10]Buchanan James McGill, Tullock Gordon. The Calculus of Consent:Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,1962.
[11]Coase Ronald H. The Nature of the Firm. Economica,1937,4(16):386-405.
[12]Coase Ronald H. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics,1960,3 (1): 1-44.
[13]Coddmgton Alan. Creaking Semaphore and Beyond:A Consideration of Shackle's 'Epistemics and Economies'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,1975,26(2):152-163.
[14]Crecine John P., Davis Otto A. & Jackson John E. Urban Property Markets:Some Empirical Results and Their Implications for Municipal Zoning. Journal of Law and Economics,1967,10: 79-99.
[15]Deaton B. James, Hoehn John P., Norris Patricia E. Net Buyers, Net Sellers, and Agricultural Landowner Support for Agricultural Zoning. Land Economics,2007,83(2):153-165.
[16]Ellickson Robert C. Alternatives to Zoning:Covenants, Nuisance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls. The University of Chicago Law Review,1973,40(4):681-781.
[17]Elliott Donald L. A better way to zone:ten principles to create more livable cities. Washington D.C.:Island Press,2008.
[18]Epstein Richard A. Takings:Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain, Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1985:362.
[19]Evans Tim. Large-Lot Zoning Responsible for Rapid Loss of Open Lands. http://www.njfuture.org/news/op-ed-articles/large-lot-zonin/,2011-06-31.
[20]Fernandez Raquel, Rogerson Richard. Keeping people out:income distribution, zoning and the quality of public education.International Economic Review,1997,38(1):23-42.
[21]Fischel William A. A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning. Land Economics,1978, 54(1):64-81.
[22]Fischel William A. Exclusionary zoning and growth controls:a comment on the APA's endorsement of the Mount Laurel Doctrine. Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law,1991,40: 65-73.
[23]Fischel William A. Externalities and Zoning. Public Choice,1980,35(1):37-43.
[24]Fischel William A. The Economics of Zoning Laws:A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1985:274-279.
[25]Fischel William A. Zoning and land use regulation. http://www.dartmouth.edu/-wfischel/Papers/WAF-zoning%20ELEpdf.pdf,1999.
[26]Frazier Bart. Zoning's attack on liberty and property, http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0610d.asp 2007-02-02.
[27]Frederickson George H. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1996.(中译本：张成福等译.公共行政的精神.北京：中国人民大学出版社,2009)
[28]Garkovich Lori. Effects of Zoning on Rural Land. http://www.slidefinder.net/e/effects zoning rural land lori/pp3garkovich-b/9713128. 2003-12-01.
[29]Giddens Anthony. The constitution of society-outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford: Polity Press,1984(中译本：李康、李猛译,社会的构成：结构化理论大纲.北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998)
[30]Grant Jill. Mixed Use in Theory and Practice:Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle. Journal of the American Planning Association,2002,68(1):71-84.
[31]Grice Andrew. Whitehall'needs radical reform'to avoid a crisis. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/whitehall-needs-radical-reform-to-avoid-a-crisis-7 536447.html.2012-03-05.
[32]Grieson Ronald E. And White James R. The Effects of Zoning on Structure and Land Markets. Journal of the Urban Economics,1981,10:271-285.
[33]Grigg David. The Logic of Regional Systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1965,55(3):465-491.
[34]Guttenberg Albert Z. Regionalization as a Symbolic Process. Canadian Journal of Regional Science,1988,10(3):373-392.
[35]Guttenberg Albert Z. Toward a Behavioral Theory of Regionalization. Theories and Models of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space. Pisa:Springer-Verlag,1992,639:110-121.
[36]Hall Ola & Arnberg Wolter. A Method for Landscape Regionalization Based on Fuzzy Membership Signature. Landscape and Urban Planning,2002,59(4):227-240.
[37]Hartshorne Richard. The Nature of Geography:A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1939,29(3):173-412.
[38]Hartshorne Richard. The Nature of Geography:A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past (Conclusion). Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1939,29(4): 413-658.
[39]Hayek Friedrich A. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1960.
[40]Hecke M. T. Zoning Ordinances and Restrictions in Deeds. The Yale Law Journal,1928, 37(4):407-425.
[41]Hengera R. & Bizera K. Tradable planning permits for land-use control in Germany. Land Use Policy,2010,27:843-852.
[42]Henneberry David M. and Barrows Richard L. Capitalization of Exclusive Agricultural Zoning into Farmland Prices. Land Economics,1990,66(3):249-258.
[43]Hirsch Werner Z. The Efficiency of Restrictive Land Use Instruments. Land Economics, 1977,53(2):145-156.
[44]International City/County Management Association (ICMA) & American Planning Association (APA). The Practice of Local Government Planning. Washington D. C.:ICMA,2000.(中译本：张永刚等译.地方政府的规划实践-原著第三版.北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2006)
[45]ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). An Overview of Land Use Control Management Systems, BRNFLD-3. Washington D. C.:Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Brownfields Team, www.itrcweb.org,2008.
[46]James Franklin J. & Windsor Oliver Duane. Fiscal Zoning, Fiscal Reform, and Exclusionary Land Use Controls. Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1976,42(2):130-141.
[47]Johnston R. J. Classification in geography. Concepts and techniques in modern geography 6. Norwich:Environmental Publications,1976. http://qmrg.org.uk/files/2008/11/6-classification-in-geography.pdf,2008-11-06.
[48]Johnston Robert A., Schwartz Seymour I., Wandesforde-Smith Geoffrey A., et al. Selling Zoning:Do Density Bonus Incentives for Moderate-Cost Housing Work. Washington University Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law,1989,65(1):1-12.
[49]Joint Economic Planning Committee (JEPC) of the Medina County. Land Use Compatibility Study. http://www.planning.co.medina.oh.us/JEPC%20Study/Land%20Use%20Compatibility%20Study report.pdf.2004-09-28.
[50]Jud G. Donald. The Effects of Zoning on Single-Family Residential Property Values: Charlotte, North Carolina. Land Economics,1980,56(2):142-154.
[51]Karkkainen Bradley C. Zoning:a reply to the critics. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law,1994,10(1):2-46.
[52]Kautz Barbara Ehrlich. In Defense of Inclusionary Zoning:Successfully Creating Affordable Housing. University of San Francisco Law Review,2002,36:971-1032.
[53]Kenneth Lieberthal(李侃如)Governing China:From Revolution Through Reform. New York:W. W. Norton & Company,2003(中文版,胡国成、赵梅译,治理中国：从革命到改革.北京：中国社会科学出版社,2010)
[54]Lai L. W C. Property rights justifications for planning and a theory of zoning. Progress in Planning,1997,48(3):161-245.
[55]Lai L. W. C. The Economics of Land Use Zoning:A Literature Review an Analysis of the Work of Coase. Town Planning Review,1994,64:77-79.
[56]Lai W. C. The economics of land-use zoning:a literature review and analysis of the work of Coase. Town Planning Review,1994,65(1):77-98.
[57]Lenon Maryjane, Chattopadhyay Sajal K. & Heffley Dennis R. Zoning and Fiscal Interdependencies. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,1996,12(2):221-234.
[58]Lichtenberg Erik. Open Space and Urban Sprawl:The Effects of Zoning and Forest Conservation Regulations in Maryland. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,2011, 40(3):393-404.
[59]Makielski S. J. Zoning:Legal Theory and Political Practice. Journal of Urban Law,1967, 45:1-22.
[60]Mandelker Danime R. Land Use Takings:The Compensation Issue. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly,1980,8:491-516.
[61]Marcus Norman. Exclusionary zoning:the need for a regional planning context. New York Law Forum,1970,16:732-740.
[62]Mason Greg. The deregulation of urban land markets:a note on the alternatives to zoning. Annals of Regional Science,1979, (3):54-66.
[63]McLean Mary. Local Planning Administration (Third Ed). Chicago:The International City Managers'Association,1959.
[64]Miceli Thomas J. and Segerson Kathleen. Regulatory Takings:When Should Compensation be Paid? Journal of Legal Studies,1994,23(2):749-776.
[65]Miceli Thomas J. Optimal Fiscal Zoning That Distorts Housing Consumption. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,1992,5:323-331.
[66]Mills David E. Segregation, Rationing and Zoning. Southern Economic Journal,1979,45(4): 1195-1207.
[67]Morrisette Peter M. Conservation easements and the public good:preserving the environment on private lands. Natural Resources Journal,2001,41(2):373-426.
[68]Mueller Dennis C. Public Choice Ⅲ. Cambridge University Press,2003(中译本：杨春学等译.公共选择理论-第三版.北京：中国社会科学出版社,2010)
[69]New York City, http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/subcats/zoning.shtml,2013.
[70]North Douglass C. Institutional Change and Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic History,1971,31(1):118-125.
[71]North Douglass. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1990.
[72]Nuissla H. & Schlaack Christoph S. On the economic approach to the containment of land consumption. Environmental Science & Policy,2009,12(3):270-280.
[73]OECD. Economies in Transition:Structural Adjustment Experience in OECD Countries. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,1989.
[74]Ohls James C., Weisberg Richard Chadbourn, White Michelle J. The Effect of Zoning on Land Value. Journal of Urban Economics,1974, (1):428-444.
[75]OlsonMancur Lloyd. The Logic of Collective Action:Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1965.
[76]Osborne David, Gaebler Ted. Reinventing Government:How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York:Plume,1993(中译本：周敦仁等译.改革政府-企业家精神如何改革着公共部门.上海：上海译文出版社,2010)
[77]Ostrom Elinor, Gardner Roy & Walker James. Rules, Games, and Common Pool Resources. Ann Arbor:Michigan University Press,1994(中译本：王巧玲等译.规则、博弈与公共池塘资源.西安：陕西人民出版社,2011)
[78]Ostrom Elinor, Larry Schroeder, & Susan Wynne. Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development:Infrastructure Policies in Perspective. Boulder CO:Westview Press,1993(中译本：毛寿龙译.制度激励与可持续发展：基础设施政策透视.上海：上海三联书店,2000)
[79]Ostrom Elinor. A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action. American Political Science Review,1998,92(1):1-22.
[80]Peltzman Sam, Levine Michael E. & Noll Roger G. The economic theory of regulation after a decade of deregulation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity:Microeconomics,1989,1989: 1-41.
[81]Peltzman Sam. Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics,1976,19(2):211-240.
[82]Pogodzinski J. Michael & Sass Tim R. The Economic Theory of Zoning:A Critical Review. Land Economics,1990,66(3):294-314.
[83]Pruetz Rick. Beyond givings and takings:saving natural areas, farmland, and historic landmarks with transfer of development rights and density transfer charges. Los Angeles:Arje Press,2003.
[84]Ramadan Tariq. Radical reform:Islamic ethics and liberation. Oxford University Press,2008.
[85]Sayre Paul. Aesthetics and Property Values:Does Zoning Promote the Public Welfare? American Bar Association Journal,1948,35:471.
[86]Schill Michael H. Regulations and Housing Development:What We Know and What We Need to Know, http://www.huduser.org/rbc/pdf/regulations housing development.pdf,2004-05.
[87]Schmutz George L. Economic Effects of Zoning. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Part 2:Zoning in the United States,1931,155:172-177.
[88]Shenkel William M. The Economic Consequences of Industrial Zoning. Land Economics, 1964,40(3):255-265.
[89]Shrago Yevgeny. Anything Zoning Can Do, Covenants Can Do Too. Harvard law& policy review, http://hlpronline.com/2012/03/,2012-03-21.
[90]Siegan Bernard H. Non-Zoning in Houston. Journal of Law and Economics,1970,13(1): 71-147.
[91]Stigler George J. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,1971,2(1):3-21.
[92]Stockman Paul K. Anti-Snob Zoning in Massachusetts:Assessing One Attempt at Opening the Suburbs to Affordable Housing. Virginia Law Review,1992,78:535-580.
[93]Stoebuck William B. Police Power, Takings, and Due Process. Washington and Lee Law Review,1980,37(4):1057-1099.
[94]Toole Randal O. Land-Use Regulation Does Increase Income Inequality. http://www.cato.org/blog/yes-land-use-regulation-does-increase-income-inequality.2012-07-23.
[95]Turner Ⅱ B.L., Skole D., Sanderson S., et al. Land-use and land-cover change science/research plan. IGBP Report NO.35 and HDP Report No7. Stockholm:IGBP,1995.
[96]Wallace Nancy E. The Market Effects of Zoning Undeveloped Land:Does Zoning Follow the Market? Journal of Urban Economics 1988,2:301-326.
[97]Wang Shaoguang. Defective Institution and Its Consequences:The Institutional Roots of Central-Local Rivalry in China,1980-1993. http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/gpa/wang files/Roots.pdf 2000-02-05.
[98]Whatcom County Zoning Ordinance. http://www.co.whatcom.wa.us/pds/pdf/title20 revised308.pdf,2008-03.
[99]Wilkens Edward B. Impact of Rural Zoning on Agriculture. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/17343/1/ar560103.pdf.1956-01-03.
[100]Williamson O. E. The New Institutional Economics:Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature,2000,38(2):595-613.
[101]Witt Donald R. Progress in the Science of Zoning. Nebraska Law Review,1965,44(1): 151-179.
[102]Wolf Charles. A Theory of "non-market failure":framework for implementation analysis (first published in 1978). The Rand paper series, P-6034, http://130.154.3.14/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2006/P6034.pdf.2006.
[103]Wolf Charles. Market and Non-Market Failures:Comparison and Assessment. Journal of Public Policy,1987.7(1):43-70.
[104]Zuger William P. Exclusionary Zoning. North Dakota Law Review,1974,50:45-60.
[105][德]范伯格著,史世伟等译.经济学中的规则和选择.西安：陕西人民出版社,2011.
[106][德]哈特向(Hartshorne Richard)著,黎樵译.地理学性质的透视(原著1959).北京：商务印书馆,1996.
[107][德]赫特纳(Hettner Alfred)著,王兰生译.地理学——它的历史、性质和方法(原著1927年).北京：商务印书馆,1985.
[108][加]梁鹤年.人本思想与公共利益.国际城市规划,2008,22(1)：99-101.
[109][美]邦奇(Bunge William)著,石高玉、石高俊译.理论地理学(原著1962年)北京：商务印书馆,1991.
[110][苏]萨莫伊洛夫(ИВ СамойЛов)著,李恒译.自然区划方法论(作者1957年在北京的讲稿).北京：科学出版社,1957.
[111][苏]伊萨钦科(A.Г.ИсаЧенко)著,胡寿田译.今日地理学(原著1973年).北京：商务印书馆,1986.
[112][苏]伊萨钦科(A.Г.ИсаЧенко)著,中山大学地质地理系译.自然地理学原理(译自作者1957-1959年在中山大学、北京大学讲课的讲稿).北京：高等教育出版社,1965.
[113]蔡继明.土地管制不能依靠所有制歧视.http://money.163.com/12/0307/16/7S0PRP4300254O4Vall.html,2012-03-07.
[114]陈刚,刘欣葵,张瑾.美国地方政府的规划实践(之五).北京规划建设,2002,(5)：70-75.
[115]陈剑.政治体制改革应当从现有制度入手.http://www.21 ccom.net/articles/zgyi/ggcx/article 2012110970723.html,2012-11-09.
[116]陈利根.土地用途管制制度研究.南京农业大学博士学位论文,2000.
[117]程烨,王静,孟繁华.土地用途分区管制研究.北京：地质出版社,2003.
[118]丁维莉,章元.局部改革与公共政策效果的交互性和复杂性.经济研究,2009,(6)：28-39.
[119]董祚继,邓红蒂.建立适合中国国情的土地用途分区管制制度,土地用途管制与耕地保护.北京大学出版社,1997：98-104.
[120]杜钢建,刘杰.美国地方政府与地方自治.小城镇建设,2000,(3)：66-67.
[121]段正梁.关于土地科学中土地概念的一些思考.中国土地科学,2000,14(4)：18-21.
[122]樊纲.渐进改革的政治经济学分析.上海：上海远东出版社,1996.
[123]范树平,程久苗,程美琴,等.国内外土地利用分区研究概况与展望.广东土地科学,2009,8(4)：22-27.
[124]傅蔚冈.土地管制制度不改,违规征地难除http://think.sifl.org/?p=3206,2011-05-20.
[125]韩渊丰,张治勋,赵汝植.区域地理理论与方法.西安：陕西师范大学出版社,1999.
[126]郝春艳,黄明华.对城市总体规划中心城区空间管制分区的建议,生态文明视角下的城乡规划——2008中国城市规划年会论文集.大连：大连出版社,2008.
[127]何芳.土地利用规划.上海：百家出版社,1994.
[128]华闻周刊.刺激经济发展英国拟放松城市规划法.http://www.thechineseweekly.com/article.php?id=7825,2012-09-07.
[129]黄秉维.中国综合自然区划草案.科学通报,1959,(18)：594-602.
[130]霍宪森.中国政治体制改革的理论研究方法要尽快从书斋走向现实.http://www.aisixiang.com/data/detail.php?id5571,2005-01-25.
[131]纪大海.顶层设计与教育科学发展.中国教育学刊,2009,(9)：28-30.
[132]江平.法治中国需政治体制改革http://finance.qq.com/a/20120320/001947.htm, 2012-03-20.
[133]赖世刚.开发许可制与土地使用分区管制比较研究——从财产权与信息经济分析入手.规划师,2002,18(4)：64-66,70.
[134]李正国,王仰麟,张小飞,等.景观生态区划的理论研究.地理科学进展,2006,25(5)：10-20.
[135]燎原.林业局和国土局的“暗战”http://www.nfcmag.com/article/3846.html, 2013-01-23.
[136]林超.河北省及其附近地区自然区划工作的一些经验.地理学报,1960,26(1)：52-60.
[137]林毅夫.关于制度变迁的经济学理论：诱致性变迁与强制性变迁http://4a.hep.edu.cn/ncourse/ep/resource/part1/WE/18.htm,1994.
[138]刘飞.城乡规划的法律性质分析.国家行政学院学报,2009，(2)：45-48.
[139]刘国臻.土地利用分区管制论略.政法学刊,2003,20(5)：26-28.
[140]刘康.为什么要建立“城乡建设用地空间管制制度”.中国国土资源报,2008-11-28.
[141]刘守英.中国土地管制制度限制了农地流转.http://business.sohu.com/20100128/n269888628.shtml,2010-01-28.
[142]刘卫东.江汉平原土地类型与综合自然区划.地理学报,1994,49(1)：73-83.
[143]刘胤汉.土地类型与综合自然区划.西安：陕西师范大学地理系,1982.
[144]柳传志.中国企业家很软弱没勇气抗衡政府不当行为(原载于中国青年报)http://tech.ifeng.com/it/detail 201211/07/18914876 O.shtml,2012-11-07.
[145]卢现祥.我国的渐进式改革及其寻租问题.中南财经大学学报,1998,(5)：15-21.
[146]毛寿龙.坐而论道为公立学：公共管理与治道变革.北京：中国法制出版社,2008.
[147]孟旭光.国土资源规划理论与实践.北京：地质出版社,2009.
[148]倪绍祥.土地类型与土地评价(第二版).北京：高等教育出版社,1999：1-115.
[149]欧名豪.土地用途分区体系探讨.南京农业大学学报,2001,24(3)：111-116.
[150]彭小雷,苏洁琼,焦怡雪,等.城市总体规划中“四区”的划定方法研究.城市规划,2009,33(2)：56-61.
[151]戚聿东,柳学信.深化垄断行业改革的模式与路径：整体渐进改革观.中国工业经济,2008,(6)：44-55.
[152]曲福田.土地行政学.南京：江苏人民出版社,1997.
[153]石磊,李巍.河北省将大幅削减房地产开发审批并清理收费项目.http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2009-02/24/content 1240740.htm,2009-02-24.
[154]史舟,吴宏海,王人潮.空间分析技术和图论树算法在农业区划中的应用.中国图像图形学报,2000,5(3)：244-248.
[155]孙斌栋,王颖,郑正.城市总体规划中的空间区划与管制.城市发展研究,2007,14(3)：32-36.
[156]谭术魁,张孜仪.寻租行为在土地用途管制中的衍生路径及抑制.中国土地科学,2012,26(5)：76-81.
[157]汪秀莲,张建平.土地用途分区管制国际比较.中国土地科学,2001,15(4)：16-21.
[158]汪玉凯,竹立家.改革重点在于限制政府权力(原载于京华时报) http://news.163.com/12/1109/03/8FRCOJ8700014AED.html,2012-11-09.
[159]王超.关于土地类型结构及其与综合自然区划关系的初步探讨.地理科学,1994,6(2)：191-194.
[160]王静.关于我国县级土地用途管制分区类型的建议.中国土地科学,2001,15(4)：26-30.
[161]王万茂,严金明,韩桐魁,等.土地利用规划学.北京：中国大地出版社,1996.
[162]王向东,刘卫东.土地利用规划：公权力与私权利.中国土地科学,2012a,26(3)：34-40.
[163]王向东,刘卫东.土地利用规划：由概念和本质属性谈起.国土资源情报,2011,(10)：54-60.
[164]王向东,刘卫东.中国空间规划体系的现状、问题与重构.经济地理,2012b,32(5)：7-15.
[165]王小映,郑振源,盛洪,等.土地制度改革与修法建言.中国改革,2012,(3)：73-80,82.
[166]吴传钧,郭焕成.中国土地利用.北京：科学出版社,1994.
[167]吴传钧.土地和国土.经济地理,1982,(3)：221.
[168]吴殿廷,朱青.区域定量划分方法的初步研究——兼论用断裂点理论进行区域划分问题.北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,39(3)：412-416.
[169]吴殿廷.突变理论与自然区划,资源·环境·区域开发——青年地理工作者论文集.长春：吉林文史出版社,1986：29-33.
[170]吴敬琏.构筑竞争性市场体系.http://finance.ifeng.com/news/special/yb12013/20130222/7691965.shtml,2013-02-22.
[171]吴启焰.城市社会空间分异的研究领域及进展.城市规划汇刊,1999,(3)：23-26.
[172]伍光和,蔡运龙.综合自然地理学(第二版).北京：高等教育出版社,2004.
[173]西广成.生态经济区划的熵方法.自动化学报,1990,16(2)：170-173.
[174]晓冬.冲破思想观念的障碍、突破利益固化的藩篱：顶层设计理论框架设想.http://paper.people.com.cn/rmlt/html/2012-12/20/content_1163649.htm?div=-1,2012-12-20.
[175]新华网(转载之瞭望新闻周刊).规划编制的“三国演义”.http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2005-11/10/content_3757733.htm,2005-11-10.
[176]徐邓耀,税远友.论土地利用分区.四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),1996,17(2)：71-74.
[177]许牧.试论土地利用区划.经济地理,1982,(1)：18-21.
[178]杨勤业.自然地理区划研究,20世纪中国学术大典：地理学.福州：福建教育出版社,2002.
[179]杨仕省.房产项目开发需166个公章不合理盖章藏部门利益.http://finance.ifeng.com/news/house/20130202/7637481.shtml,2013-02-02.
[180]杨子生,郝性中.土地利用区划几个问题的探讨.云南大学学报(自然科学版),1995,17(4)：363-368.
[181]叶剑平,宋家宁.基于产权视角的中国土地问题探析.人民论坛学术前沿(总第321 期)http://www.rmlt.com.cn/News/201103/201103251105345999.html,2011-03-25.
[182]叶竹盛.法院：“数字化生存”的逻辑与异化(源于南风窗网.http://www.nfcmag.com/article/3813.html,2013-01-04.
[183]于猛,宁晶.全国违法占用耕地面积公路铁路超一半.人民日报,2011-03-24.
[184]袁烨城,周成虎,覃彪,等.多层次格网模型的近邻指数聚类生态区划算法与实验——以新疆北部地区区划为例.地球信息科学学报,2011,13(1)：1-11.
[185]宅斌.合肥市土地利用总体规划用地分区研究.华东经济管理,1996,(5)：13-15.
[186]张晓山.中国农村土地制度变革的回顾和展望.学习与探索,2006,(5)：172-179.
[187]张洋.论我国现行体制下司法权与行政权的制衡问题.http://www.zjfzb.gov.cn/il.htm?a=si&key=main/fzyj&id=5c3f755b2b483ac5012c3a09a99d0e82, 2010-11-11.
[188]赵松乔,陈传康,牛文元.近三十年来我国综合自然地理学的进展.地理学报,1979,34(3)：187-199.
[189]郑度,欧阳,周成虎.对自然地理区划方法的认识与思考.地理学报,2008,63(6)：563-573.
[190]郑伟元.制度创新：城乡建设用地空间管制,管制用途、规划空间——专家谈城乡建设用地空间管制制度.中国国土资源报,2009-03-27.
[191]郑文含.城镇体系规划中的区域空间管制.规划师,2005,21(3)：72-77.
[192]郑振源.土地制度改革要义.中国改革,2010,(10)：76-79.
[193]周剑云,戚冬瑾.我国城市用地分类的困境及改革建议.城市规划,2008,32(3)：45-49.
[194]周金星,魏远,漆良华,等.基于ISODATA法的三峡库区生态区划.长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(3)：446-450.
[195]周立三.中国农业区划的理论与实践.合肥：中国科技大学出版社,1993.
[196]周新民.人事制度改革“顶层设计”把握“六大模块”http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2013/0220/c148980-20545216.html,2013-02-20.