岩壁复绿基质的持水性及土壤微生物活性
|
摘要
本文通过室内盆栽试验并结合野外喷播实践,以白三叶、紫穗槐、黑麦草、波斯菊4种植物幼苗作为实验材料,研究喷播基质配比技术和土壤菌群对岩石界面的活化技术,对解决山体水分保持和岩壁—喷施基质的融合问题,实现破坏山体植被恢复的长期维持,为我国的破坏山体植被恢复与环境重建提供理论依据和技术支撑。获得以下主要研究成果:
(1)保水剂含量对基质物理特性的影响
①不同结构基质的容重和非毛管孔隙度随保水剂含量的增加而逐渐减小,容重尤其当保水剂含量超过0.3 %以后,基质容重会明显偏低较低,非毛管孔隙度明显偏小。而总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度和保水能力均随保水剂含量的增加而提高,表明保水剂含量增加会明显提高喷播基质的总孔隙度和毛管孔隙度及其持水与供水能力。
②保水剂含量对基质抗冲性、抗剪性的影响相同。抗冲指数和抗剪强度均出现先增加后减小的变化趋势。保水剂含量在0.15%~0.3 %之间,会在一定程度上增加喷播基质抗冲能力和抗剪强度,促进植物生长和覆盖对地表的保护作用。不同结构基质的抗冲指数和抗剪强度随着时间的增加而增加,保水剂比例对基质的抗冲性和抗剪性时间动态变化趋势没产生显著影响。
(2)保水剂含量对植物生长的影响
①4种植物平均出苗率、苗高均高于土壤对照处理。随着保水剂含量增加,出苗率逐渐增加,而苗高先逐渐增大后逐渐减小。不同保水剂含量下,紫穗槐、白三叶和黑麦草的出苗率(分别为12.6%、74%和19%,)在0.30 %时达到最高,波斯菊的峰值出0.2%时(63%);其中波斯菊在0.3%梯度是达到最大值(9.5cm),黑麦草峰值出现在0.5%梯度(11.5cm),紫穗槐峰值在0.15%梯度时就出现,是峰值对应的保水剂含量最低的植物种。各保水剂梯度之间苗高相差不大,说明保水剂能够促进幼苗生长,但是对幼苗高影响有限,尤其是达到一定峰值后随着保水剂含量的增加苗高反而会减小。
②保水剂能增加土壤田间持水量,从4种植物种不同保水剂含量下的枯萎率看,总体上保水剂含量越高,相同时间内幼苗枯萎率越低,保水剂条件下植物的耐旱时间要明显增长。4种植物种枯萎速率快慢依次为:波斯菊>黑麦草>白三叶>紫穗槐。采用Tukey法多重比较后发现,保水剂含量差距越小,差异性就越不明显,反之则差异越大,这充分说明连旱条件下保水剂对延长植物生长时间的促进作用。
(3)保水剂含量对植物生理的影响
①本研究得出,8种基质条件下紫穗槐的Pn和Tr日变化均呈双峰型曲线;波斯菊、白三叶、黑麦草3种植物蒸腾速率日动态为单峰型曲线。峰值多出现在11:00～12:00左右。日动态曲线呈现“双峰型”的变化规律时,第一峰值多是高于第二峰值。在水分充足的对照条件下,保水剂对4种植物的影响作用基本相同。随着保水剂含量的增加,4种植物不同保水剂梯度出现峰值时间及峰值变化不完全不同;同时不是随着保水剂的增加而增加,而是在保水剂0.15%-0.3%对植物光合、蒸腾作用最有利。
②4种植物的在不同保水剂梯度下WUE变化趋势不同,水分利用效率日变化出现明显的波动,保水剂含量对4种植物水分利用效率的影响没有明显的规律性。结果表明所选4种植物具有较高的水分利用效率,适合在立地条件贫瘠的地方栽植,是良好的山体复绿的植物种。
(4)保水剂含量对基质水分动态变化的影响
①在萌芽期及成苗期不同保水剂梯度下基质水分动态变化趋势基本相同,均随着保水剂含量的增加,基质含水量变化趋势缓慢,基质持水性能增加,高含水时间增加。植物种类对保水剂梯度间基质水分变化趋势无显著影响。
②4种植物的基质含水量日变化趋势基本相同均为:中午12点之前,温度逐渐升高,基质水分含量略有下降,但下降幅度较小;12点至下午1点,水份蒸发和植物蒸腾作用达到最大值,出现了大幅度下降;1点之后基质水分缓慢明显下降。施用保水剂能有效抑制水分蒸发,且随着用量的增加,其持水性能逐渐增强。保水剂用量越大的处理,土壤含水量日变化越小,土壤含水量可长期处于较高水平。
(5)微生物对岩石的风化作用
①研究结果表明微生物-矿物的相互作用影响了矿物的溶解和沉淀。在南京幕府山采集的白云石矿石,通过富集分离法和直接矿石利用法筛选岩石降解菌,挑选出高活性菌株14株,其中6株细菌,8株真菌。经过显微观察和生理生化试验,将细菌1和细菌2鉴定为假单胞属,因而暂将细菌1和2命名为Pseudomonassp.PS-1和Pseudomonassp.PS-2。真菌株3和4初步确定菌株3和4属于曲霉属Aspergillus,暂命名为Aspergillus-3和Aspergillus-4,菌株5为木霉属,菌株6属于青霉属。
②真菌对白云石的风化作用是个复杂的过程,不仅有菌丝的机械破坏作用,还有胞外大分子物质的作用。真菌胞外分泌物有利于矿物的风化作用。
综合评价不同保水剂含量对植物的生长及生理指标的影响以及对基质结构特性的影响,得出保水剂含量在0.15%~0.3%范围之间,能改善基质结构,提高植被成活率,减少基质水土流失。江苏地区在今后客土喷播技术实施过程中,保水剂的用量应该在0.15%~0.3%这一范围;同时应当借鉴日本土壤菌永久绿化技术,在喷播过程中添加土壤有效菌种,增加基质微生物数量,加速研究生物风化,增加喷播基质的稳固性及与岩壁的融合性,从而实现破坏山体复绿的长期维持。
In recent years, the external-soil spray seeding technique is widely used to the ecological restoration on damaged mountain body. The structural composition of spray seeding matrix decides the stability and efficiency. But there is little research on the moisture physical properties of spray seeding matrix and the effect on vegetation growth. Study on the structural composition of spray seeding matrix and the soil fungi activation technique on rock slopes with a pot plant experiment and field spray seeding practices. And regarding trifolium repens、amorpha、ryegrass、calliopsis as experimental materials. The study could solve the difficult problems that water retention and the rock slope-spray seeding matrix interface integration. These theoretical and technical gist are very useful at vegetation restoration on damaged mountain body and environmental reconstruction in our country. The results as follow:
(1) Effect of water holding agent on the physical properties of spray seeding matrix
①Results had showed that its function was obviously different in different water holding agent content. With increasing holding agent content, density and non-capillary porosity reduced all along, but porosity and capillary porosity increased always. Especially the water holding content was more than 0.3 %, the density and non-capillary porosity were too small. So the result showed that water holding agent can obviously increase the water retention ability of spray seeding matrix.
②Effect of water holding agent on spray seeding matrix anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability were same. With increasing holding agent content, the anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability were increased firstly and reduced. And the content of water holding agent in 0.15%~0.3 % range could Strengthen the anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability of spray seeding matrix at a certain extent, improve vegetation growth and protection to soil face. And the anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability of different structural spray seeding matrix strengthened with time increase, and the change of water holding agent content had no influence on temporal dynamic change tend of the anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability .
(2) Effect of water holding agent on the plant growth
①The average germination rate and seedling height were higher than soil treatment. With increasing holding agent content, the germination rate and seedling height were increased firstly and reduced. The maximum germination rate of trifolium repens(12.6%)、amorpha(74%) and ryegrass (19%),were on 0.3% content of water holding, but the maximum germination rate of calliopsis was on 0.2% content. The highest tall of 4 species were not on same water holding agent content, and the seedling height were not obvious different on different water holding agent content. So the effect of water holding agent content on seedling height was limit, and if achieved some peak, increasing water holding agent would decreased seedling height.
②Water holding agent can field capacity. As a whole, the higher content of water holding agent, the seedling fade rates of 4 vegetations were lower on same time. On the same water holding agent content, the fade rates of 4 species vegetation were: calliopsis> ryegrass>trifolium repens> amorpha. Using Tukey multiple comparison method found that the water holding agent could prolong vegetation growth period.
(3) Effect of water holding agent on the plant physiology
①The paper analyzed the diurnal change of photosynthesis and transpiration of 4 trees. The results indicated that all photosynthesis and transpiration rates of amorpha displayed two-peak pattern, the other 3 trees were one-peak pattern. The peak always present in 10:00~12:00. When the diurnal change of photosynthesis and transpiration were two-peak pattern, the second peak was lower than first one. In enough water condition, the effects of water holding agent content on 4 trees were same. With the content increasing the peak rates of 4 trees presented on different time and the change trend did not same also. The different water holding agent made the photosynthesis and transpiration rate of 4 trees displayed at three levels. Too low or more were had negative effect on photosynthesis and transpiration of vegetation. And the results showed that the 0.15%,0.2%,0.3% were best content for 4 vegetation growth.
②The WUE of 4 trees were different in different water holding agent, and the diurnal change of WUE appeared obvious fluctuations, and the effect of water holding agent content on WUE did not show regularity. The paper data showed that the 4 selected trees had high water using efficiency , and all were adapt to be planted in arid soil condition area.
(4) Effect of water holding agent on the water dynamic change of spray seeding matrix
①The water dynamic change of spray seeding matrix with different water holding agent content were same in germination and growth period. With the content increasing, the water content of spray seeding matrix decreasing trend become slowly, and the holding water ability of spray seeding matrix strengthened, the high water time increased. But the effect of tree species was weaker.
②The diurnal change of spray seeding matrix of 4 species trees were same, all were contrary with temperature. Using water holding agent could reduce water evaporation of spray seeding matrix, and enforced the water holding ability. If the water holding agent content was bigger, the evaporation water was smaller.
(5) The effect of microorganism weathering to rock
①The interactions between minerals and microbes, which occur widely in nature and directly result in dissolution and formation of minerals, have profound impact on the environment. Several microorganisms are isolated from the dolomite from Mufu mountain Nanjing city. Total 14 high activity microorganism strains, the 6 strains of bacteria and 8 strains of fungi. By the Microscopic observation and physiological biochemical tests, train bacteria-1 and bacteria-2 belonged to Psuedomonas, strain fungi-3 and fungi-4 were belonged to Aspergillus, fungi-5 and fungi-6 were belonged to Trichoderma and Penicillium.
②The analysis indicates the growth of microorganism on rock weathering outdo obviously. Weathering can be accelerated through the direct contact with microbes, the secretion enzyme and acidic organic-matters from the microorganisms.
Comprehensively evaluate effect of water holding agent content on plant growth、plant physiology and structure of spray seeding matrix, the water holding agent content of spray seeding matrix among the 0.15%~0.3% range can improve structure of spray seeding matrix and germination rate, reduce spray seeding matrix loss. So the water holding agent content of external-soil spray seeding project in Jiangsu province should in this range. At same time, reference perpetual greening technique of Japan, add soil fungi in spray seeding matrix to improve the rock slope-spray seeding matrix interface integration, achieve the perpetual greening on damaged mountain body.
(1)保水剂含量对基质物理特性的影响
①不同结构基质的容重和非毛管孔隙度随保水剂含量的增加而逐渐减小,容重尤其当保水剂含量超过0.3 %以后,基质容重会明显偏低较低,非毛管孔隙度明显偏小。而总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度和保水能力均随保水剂含量的增加而提高,表明保水剂含量增加会明显提高喷播基质的总孔隙度和毛管孔隙度及其持水与供水能力。
②保水剂含量对基质抗冲性、抗剪性的影响相同。抗冲指数和抗剪强度均出现先增加后减小的变化趋势。保水剂含量在0.15%~0.3 %之间,会在一定程度上增加喷播基质抗冲能力和抗剪强度,促进植物生长和覆盖对地表的保护作用。不同结构基质的抗冲指数和抗剪强度随着时间的增加而增加,保水剂比例对基质的抗冲性和抗剪性时间动态变化趋势没产生显著影响。
(2)保水剂含量对植物生长的影响
①4种植物平均出苗率、苗高均高于土壤对照处理。随着保水剂含量增加,出苗率逐渐增加,而苗高先逐渐增大后逐渐减小。不同保水剂含量下,紫穗槐、白三叶和黑麦草的出苗率(分别为12.6%、74%和19%,)在0.30 %时达到最高,波斯菊的峰值出0.2%时(63%);其中波斯菊在0.3%梯度是达到最大值(9.5cm),黑麦草峰值出现在0.5%梯度(11.5cm),紫穗槐峰值在0.15%梯度时就出现,是峰值对应的保水剂含量最低的植物种。各保水剂梯度之间苗高相差不大,说明保水剂能够促进幼苗生长,但是对幼苗高影响有限,尤其是达到一定峰值后随着保水剂含量的增加苗高反而会减小。
②保水剂能增加土壤田间持水量,从4种植物种不同保水剂含量下的枯萎率看,总体上保水剂含量越高,相同时间内幼苗枯萎率越低,保水剂条件下植物的耐旱时间要明显增长。4种植物种枯萎速率快慢依次为:波斯菊>黑麦草>白三叶>紫穗槐。采用Tukey法多重比较后发现,保水剂含量差距越小,差异性就越不明显,反之则差异越大,这充分说明连旱条件下保水剂对延长植物生长时间的促进作用。
(3)保水剂含量对植物生理的影响
①本研究得出,8种基质条件下紫穗槐的Pn和Tr日变化均呈双峰型曲线;波斯菊、白三叶、黑麦草3种植物蒸腾速率日动态为单峰型曲线。峰值多出现在11:00～12:00左右。日动态曲线呈现“双峰型”的变化规律时,第一峰值多是高于第二峰值。在水分充足的对照条件下,保水剂对4种植物的影响作用基本相同。随着保水剂含量的增加,4种植物不同保水剂梯度出现峰值时间及峰值变化不完全不同;同时不是随着保水剂的增加而增加,而是在保水剂0.15%-0.3%对植物光合、蒸腾作用最有利。
②4种植物的在不同保水剂梯度下WUE变化趋势不同,水分利用效率日变化出现明显的波动,保水剂含量对4种植物水分利用效率的影响没有明显的规律性。结果表明所选4种植物具有较高的水分利用效率,适合在立地条件贫瘠的地方栽植,是良好的山体复绿的植物种。
(4)保水剂含量对基质水分动态变化的影响
①在萌芽期及成苗期不同保水剂梯度下基质水分动态变化趋势基本相同,均随着保水剂含量的增加,基质含水量变化趋势缓慢,基质持水性能增加,高含水时间增加。植物种类对保水剂梯度间基质水分变化趋势无显著影响。
②4种植物的基质含水量日变化趋势基本相同均为:中午12点之前,温度逐渐升高,基质水分含量略有下降,但下降幅度较小;12点至下午1点,水份蒸发和植物蒸腾作用达到最大值,出现了大幅度下降;1点之后基质水分缓慢明显下降。施用保水剂能有效抑制水分蒸发,且随着用量的增加,其持水性能逐渐增强。保水剂用量越大的处理,土壤含水量日变化越小,土壤含水量可长期处于较高水平。
(5)微生物对岩石的风化作用
①研究结果表明微生物-矿物的相互作用影响了矿物的溶解和沉淀。在南京幕府山采集的白云石矿石,通过富集分离法和直接矿石利用法筛选岩石降解菌,挑选出高活性菌株14株,其中6株细菌,8株真菌。经过显微观察和生理生化试验,将细菌1和细菌2鉴定为假单胞属,因而暂将细菌1和2命名为Pseudomonassp.PS-1和Pseudomonassp.PS-2。真菌株3和4初步确定菌株3和4属于曲霉属Aspergillus,暂命名为Aspergillus-3和Aspergillus-4,菌株5为木霉属,菌株6属于青霉属。
②真菌对白云石的风化作用是个复杂的过程,不仅有菌丝的机械破坏作用,还有胞外大分子物质的作用。真菌胞外分泌物有利于矿物的风化作用。
综合评价不同保水剂含量对植物的生长及生理指标的影响以及对基质结构特性的影响,得出保水剂含量在0.15%~0.3%范围之间,能改善基质结构,提高植被成活率,减少基质水土流失。江苏地区在今后客土喷播技术实施过程中,保水剂的用量应该在0.15%~0.3%这一范围;同时应当借鉴日本土壤菌永久绿化技术,在喷播过程中添加土壤有效菌种,增加基质微生物数量,加速研究生物风化,增加喷播基质的稳固性及与岩壁的融合性,从而实现破坏山体复绿的长期维持。
In recent years, the external-soil spray seeding technique is widely used to the ecological restoration on damaged mountain body. The structural composition of spray seeding matrix decides the stability and efficiency. But there is little research on the moisture physical properties of spray seeding matrix and the effect on vegetation growth. Study on the structural composition of spray seeding matrix and the soil fungi activation technique on rock slopes with a pot plant experiment and field spray seeding practices. And regarding trifolium repens、amorpha、ryegrass、calliopsis as experimental materials. The study could solve the difficult problems that water retention and the rock slope-spray seeding matrix interface integration. These theoretical and technical gist are very useful at vegetation restoration on damaged mountain body and environmental reconstruction in our country. The results as follow:
(1) Effect of water holding agent on the physical properties of spray seeding matrix
①Results had showed that its function was obviously different in different water holding agent content. With increasing holding agent content, density and non-capillary porosity reduced all along, but porosity and capillary porosity increased always. Especially the water holding content was more than 0.3 %, the density and non-capillary porosity were too small. So the result showed that water holding agent can obviously increase the water retention ability of spray seeding matrix.
②Effect of water holding agent on spray seeding matrix anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability were same. With increasing holding agent content, the anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability were increased firstly and reduced. And the content of water holding agent in 0.15%~0.3 % range could Strengthen the anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability of spray seeding matrix at a certain extent, improve vegetation growth and protection to soil face. And the anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability of different structural spray seeding matrix strengthened with time increase, and the change of water holding agent content had no influence on temporal dynamic change tend of the anti-scour ability and anti-shearing ability .
(2) Effect of water holding agent on the plant growth
①The average germination rate and seedling height were higher than soil treatment. With increasing holding agent content, the germination rate and seedling height were increased firstly and reduced. The maximum germination rate of trifolium repens(12.6%)、amorpha(74%) and ryegrass (19%),were on 0.3% content of water holding, but the maximum germination rate of calliopsis was on 0.2% content. The highest tall of 4 species were not on same water holding agent content, and the seedling height were not obvious different on different water holding agent content. So the effect of water holding agent content on seedling height was limit, and if achieved some peak, increasing water holding agent would decreased seedling height.
②Water holding agent can field capacity. As a whole, the higher content of water holding agent, the seedling fade rates of 4 vegetations were lower on same time. On the same water holding agent content, the fade rates of 4 species vegetation were: calliopsis> ryegrass>trifolium repens> amorpha. Using Tukey multiple comparison method found that the water holding agent could prolong vegetation growth period.
(3) Effect of water holding agent on the plant physiology
①The paper analyzed the diurnal change of photosynthesis and transpiration of 4 trees. The results indicated that all photosynthesis and transpiration rates of amorpha displayed two-peak pattern, the other 3 trees were one-peak pattern. The peak always present in 10:00~12:00. When the diurnal change of photosynthesis and transpiration were two-peak pattern, the second peak was lower than first one. In enough water condition, the effects of water holding agent content on 4 trees were same. With the content increasing the peak rates of 4 trees presented on different time and the change trend did not same also. The different water holding agent made the photosynthesis and transpiration rate of 4 trees displayed at three levels. Too low or more were had negative effect on photosynthesis and transpiration of vegetation. And the results showed that the 0.15%,0.2%,0.3% were best content for 4 vegetation growth.
②The WUE of 4 trees were different in different water holding agent, and the diurnal change of WUE appeared obvious fluctuations, and the effect of water holding agent content on WUE did not show regularity. The paper data showed that the 4 selected trees had high water using efficiency , and all were adapt to be planted in arid soil condition area.
(4) Effect of water holding agent on the water dynamic change of spray seeding matrix
①The water dynamic change of spray seeding matrix with different water holding agent content were same in germination and growth period. With the content increasing, the water content of spray seeding matrix decreasing trend become slowly, and the holding water ability of spray seeding matrix strengthened, the high water time increased. But the effect of tree species was weaker.
②The diurnal change of spray seeding matrix of 4 species trees were same, all were contrary with temperature. Using water holding agent could reduce water evaporation of spray seeding matrix, and enforced the water holding ability. If the water holding agent content was bigger, the evaporation water was smaller.
(5) The effect of microorganism weathering to rock
①The interactions between minerals and microbes, which occur widely in nature and directly result in dissolution and formation of minerals, have profound impact on the environment. Several microorganisms are isolated from the dolomite from Mufu mountain Nanjing city. Total 14 high activity microorganism strains, the 6 strains of bacteria and 8 strains of fungi. By the Microscopic observation and physiological biochemical tests, train bacteria-1 and bacteria-2 belonged to Psuedomonas, strain fungi-3 and fungi-4 were belonged to Aspergillus, fungi-5 and fungi-6 were belonged to Trichoderma and Penicillium.
②The analysis indicates the growth of microorganism on rock weathering outdo obviously. Weathering can be accelerated through the direct contact with microbes, the secretion enzyme and acidic organic-matters from the microorganisms.
Comprehensively evaluate effect of water holding agent content on plant growth、plant physiology and structure of spray seeding matrix, the water holding agent content of spray seeding matrix among the 0.15%~0.3% range can improve structure of spray seeding matrix and germination rate, reduce spray seeding matrix loss. So the water holding agent content of external-soil spray seeding project in Jiangsu province should in this range. At same time, reference perpetual greening technique of Japan, add soil fungi in spray seeding matrix to improve the rock slope-spray seeding matrix interface integration, achieve the perpetual greening on damaged mountain body.
引文
安保昭,周庆桐.坡面绿化施工法[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1988,134-142.
包维楷,陈庆恒.退化山地植被恢复和重建的基本理论和方法[J].长江流域资源与环境, 1998, 7(4): 371-376.
柏明娥,洪利兴,钱华等.浙江省海宁市尖山区鼠尾山露采矿山植被恢复技术[J].中国水土保持科学. 2006,4(Supp.): 150-155.伯杰.细菌鉴定手册(第八版) .
曹兵,宋丽华,何嘉,等.谈宁夏高等级高速公路的绿化[D].中国园林,2001:84-86.
长江水利委员会长江科学院.裸露岩坡快速植生技术.,中国科技成果库——项目年度编号:99033067.
川岛和夫.农用土壤改良剂——新型保水剂[J].姚德兴摘译.土壤学进展,1986,3:49-52.
崔英德,郭建维,阎文峰,等.SA-IP-SPS型保水剂及其对土壤物理性能的影响[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(1):28-31.
陈兵,曹子龙,杨望涛,等.客土喷播在霍林河矿山植被恢复中的应用[J].山西建筑,2009,30(35):340-342.
陈波,包志毅.国外采石场的生态和景观恢复[J].水土保持学报.2003,17(5):70-73.
陈法杨,丛佩娟等.边坡喷混植生基质材料本地化试验[J].中国水土保持, 2005,(4): 26-27.
陈芳清,卢斌,王祥荣.樟村坪磷矿废弃地植物群落的形成与演替[J].生态学报,2001,21(8):1347-1353.
陈辉跃.闽南裸露山体整治与植被恢复技术初探[J].亚热带水土保持,2007,19(1) :59-61,68.
陈密峰,张秀娟,杨健茂.反相悬浮法合成高耐盐性的超强吸水剂[J].精细化工,2002 ,19(9) :543-547.
陈家宙,陈明亮,陈圆球.各具特色的当代土壤水分测量技术[J].湖北农业科学,2001(3):25-28.
陈平雁,黄浙明.spss10.0统计软件高级应用教程[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2004.
陈平雁,黄浙明.spss13.0统计软件应用教程[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.
陈志明.草坪建植与养护[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003.
东秀珠,蔡妙英.常见细菌系统鉴定手册.科学出版社.2001.2.
丁运华.关于生态恢复几个问题的讨论[J].中国沙漠, 2000, 20(3): 341-344.
刘茂祥,王林,王振东.浅析水稻节水灌溉技术适宜控制的方法[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2005,3(2):56 -57.
介晓磊,李有田,韩燕来,等.保水剂对土壤持水性的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2000,34(1):22-24.
丁访军,钟洪明,潘明亮等.赤水河下游不同林地类型土壤物理特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报, 2009,23 (3):179-183,231.
杜鹃.客土喷播施工法在日本的应用与发展[J].公路,2000,(7):72-74.
杜社妮,白岗栓,赵世伟,等.沃特和PAM保水剂对土壤水分及马铃薯生长的影响研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(8): 72-79.
杜晓东,王丽娟,刘作新.保水剂及其在节水农业上的应用[J].河南农业大学学报,2000,34(3):255-259.
樊慧萍,张复兴,田立新.山西省公路绿化树种的多样性选择[J].山西林业科技,2005,(3)45-46.
方华,林建平.植被护坡现状与展望[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):283-285.
顾宗濂.中国富营养化湖泊的生物修复.农村生态环境,2002,18 (1):42-45.
郭连声,田有亮. 4种针叶幼树光合速率、蒸腾速率与土壤含水量的关系及其抗旱性研究[J].应用生态学报, 1994, 5(1): 32-36.
贺康宁,田阳,史常青,等.黄土半干旱区集水造林条件下林木生长适宜的土壤水分环境[J].林业科学, 2003, 39(1): 10-16.
胡聃,奚增均.生态恢复工程系统集成原理的一些理论分析[J].生态学报,2002,22(6): 866-877.
胡海波,王琛瑞,张金池.太湖流域宜溧山区水土流失防治分区技术,南京林业大学学报,2002,26(6):33-36.
胡建忠,周心澄,李文忠,等.退耕地青海云杉人工林土壤抗冲性试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(6):6-10.
胡永红,吴志峰,李定强,等.基于ARIMA模型的区域水生态足迹时间序列分析[J].生态环境,2006,15(1):94-98.
黄义瑞,田积莹,雍绍萍.土壤内在性质对对侵蚀影响的研究[J].水土保持学报,1989,(3):9-14.
黄进,张金池.苏州市空气质量的时间序列变化过程研究[J].环境科学与技术,2009,32(6): 49-52..
黄敬军,倪红升.江苏省矿业废弃地类型及其环境恢复整治模式建议[J].西北地质,2005(增刊):24-246.
黄敬军,高德云.江苏生态省建设中矿产资源合理开发利用问题的研究[J] .地质灾害与环境保,2004,15 (3):1-5.
黄敬军,李向前,陆华.江苏省露采矿山地质环境综合评价研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2005 ,(5):97- 100.
黄占斌.农用保水剂应用原理与技术[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2005:1-3.
黄占斌,万会娥,邓西平,等.保水剂在改良土壤和作物抗旱节水中的效应[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(4):2-55.
黄志霖,傅伯杰,陈利顶.恢复生态学与黄土高原生态系统的恢复与重建问题[J].水土保持学报, 2002, 16(3): 122-125.
江浩浩,董希斌,王海飙边坡土壤含水率对不同植被土壤抗剪强度的影响森林工程2009,25 (3):77-80.
姜小三,倪绍祥,潘剑君,等.温度条件对TDR测定土壤水分的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2004,(4):102-104.
李保国,龚元石,左强,等.农田土壤水动态模型及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2000,107-131.
李捍东,梁近光,钟阳,等.优势复合菌群用于城市生活污水净化新技术的研究.环境科学研究,2000,13 (5):14-16.
李宏艳,梁冰,苏荣华.土壤水热迁移问题的混合有限元法[J].灌溉排水,2002,21(1):49-52.
李辉华,郭弘艺,唐文乔,等.ARIMA模型在预测长江靖江段沿岸鱼类渔获量时间格局中的应用[J].水产学报, 2008, 32(6):899-905.
李景生,黄韵竹.土壤保水剂的吸水保水性能研究动态[J].中国沙漠,1996,16(1):86-91.
李俊,舒为群,陈济安,等1降解DBP菌株CQ0302的分离鉴定及其降解特性[J].中国环境科学,2005,25(1):47-511.
李文华,刘广权,马松涛,等.干旱胁迫对苗木蒸腾耗水和生长的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报, 2004, 32(1):61-65.
李旭光,毛文碧,徐福有.日本的公路边坡绿化与防护——1994年赴日本考察报告[J].公路交通科技, 1995, 12(2): 59-64.
李旭光,毛文碧,涂相有.日本的公路边坡绿化[J].公路交通科技.1995,12(2):59-64.
李毅,王全九,王文焰,等.入渗、再分布和蒸发条件下一维土壤水运动的数值模拟[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(1):5-8.
李云开,杨培岭,刘洪禄.保水剂农业应用及其效应研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(2):182-187.
雷志栋,杨诗秀.非饱和土壤水一维流动的数值计算[J].土壤学报,1982,19(2):141-153.
雷志栋,胡和平,杨诗秀.土壤水研究进展与评述[J].水科学进展,1999,10(3):311-318.
陆垂裕,裴源生.适应复杂上表面边界条件的一维土壤水运动数值模型[J].水利科学,2007,38(2):136-142.
吕岁菊,李春光.土壤水——盐运移规律数值模拟研究综述[J].农业科学研究,2005,26(1):107-131.
林乃正,张凤英.攀援植物[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1984.
连宾.硅酸盐细菌GY92对伊利石的释钾作用[J].矿物学报, 1998,18(2): 234-237.
连宾,傅平秋,莫德明,等.硅酸盐细菌解钾作用机理的综合效应[J].矿物学报, 2002,22(2): 179-183.
梁爱学,李统益,王清茹,等.植生带边坡防护技术研究[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版).2007,(4): 163-166.
梁爱学,王欢,晏晓林,等.营养袋技术在边坡植被防护中的应用[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版).2007,3:58-61.
梁春,林植芳,孔国辉.不同光强下生长的亚热带树苗的光合光响应特性的比较[J].应用生态学报, 1997, 8(1):7-11
刘本同,钱华,何志华,等.我国岩石边坡植被修复技术现状和展望[J].浙江林业科技, 2004,24(3):47-55.
刘春霞,韩烈保.高速公路边坡植被恢复研究进展[J].生态学报.2007,27(5):2900-2908.
刘刚,李红丽,董智,孙明高.泰山抽水蓄能电站扰动区不同植被恢复措施效果研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(6): 41-45.
刘国恩,康政虹.南京市露采矿山存在的环境问题与整治建议[J].江苏地质, 2005,29 (2):112-115.
刘国华、张金池,南京幕府山矿区废弃地植被恢复模式研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(1):141-144.
刘国华、张金池,南京幕府山构树种群的空间分布格局[J].南京林业大学学报,2005,29(1):104-106.
刘桂元.浏阳磷矿边坡植被护坡试验研究[J].冶金矿山设计与建设,1997,6:58-61.
刘建宁,高洪文,王运琦,等,山西太旧高速公路边坡绿化种草技术研究[J].中国草地,1999,(6): 23-26.
刘建培.福泉高速公路边坡植物选择[J].中国城市林业.2005,3(3):40-42.
刘青松,左平,邹欣庆,等.吴县市露天采矿区生态重建与环太湖地区生态旅游模式的契合[J].生态学杂志.2003,22(1):73-78.
刘向东.秦沈客运专线路基边坡植被防护设计与施工技术[J].岩土工程技术.2002,(1):60-62.
刘询.岩质边坡的生态恢复工程新技术研究[J].广东水利水电.2001,(5):21-22.
刘永兵,蒲万芬,杨燕,等. AA/AM二元共聚超强吸水剂的合成[J].材料科学与工艺,2007 ,15(5):723-726.
刘玉华,贾志宽,史纪安等.旱作条件下不同苜蓿品种光合作用的日变化[J].生态学报,2006,26(5):1468-1471.
刘骅,林英华,王西和,等.长期配施秸秆对灰漠土质量的影响[J].生态环境,2007,16(5): 1492-1497.
柳长顺,齐实.深圳市裸露山体缺口景观影响程度研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):36-38.
娄仲连.岩质边坡的生态恢复工程新技术研究[J].地下空间,2001,(4):318-323.
陆子锋.深圳市裸露山体缺口整治技术探讨[J].水土保持通报.2002,22(5):55-56,73.
马海天才,廖心北.边坡生物防护研究现状初探[J].四川草原,2003(3):15-16.
江苏省地质调查研究院.江苏省矿山地质环境调查与评估报告[R]. 2006.
钱华,柏明娥,刘本同等.岩质边坡绿化过程中人工土壤的重建[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4:83-86.
彭少麟.恢复生态学与植被重建.生态科学,1996 , 15 (2) :26-31.
任海,彭少麟.恢复生态学导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
沈萍,范秀容,李广武.微生物学实验[M].第3版.北京:高等教育出版社, 1999.
沈恒胜,陈君琛,汤葆莎,等.稻草品质促变因素的系统评价与秸秆种类品质比较[J].福建农业学报,2003,18(12): 222-226.
宋永昌.植被生态学.上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2001.598-599.
宋永昌.生态恢复是生态科学的最终试验[J].中国生态学会通讯,1997,(4) :4-5.
唐启义,冯明光.DPS数据处理系统[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
田晶会,贺康宁,王百田等.不同土壤水分下黄土高原侧柏生理生态特点分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):175-178.
王爱勤,张俊平.有机-无机复合高吸水性树脂研究进展与发展趋势[J].功能材料,2006,3(5):14218.
王百田,张府娥.黄土高原主要造林树种苗木蒸腾耗水特性[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2003,27(6):93-97.
王百田,杨雪松.黄土半干旱地区油松与侧柏林分适宜土壤含水量研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,16 (1) :80-83.
王琛瑞、张金池,太湖流域水土流失影响因素及土壤侵蚀预报模型,南京林业大学学报,2000,24(6):31-35.
王得祥,康博文,刘建军,等.主要城市绿化树种苗木耗水特性研究[J].西北林学院学报, 2004, 19(4): 20-23.
王海珍,梁宗锁,韩蕊莲,等.不同土壤水分条件下黄土高原乡土树种耗水规律研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(6):57-63.
王燕,宋凤斌,刘阳,等.高植物篱种植模式及其应用中存在的问题[J].广西农业生物科学,2006,25(4):369-374.
王国祥.微生物在污染环境生物修复中的应用[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(3):198-202.
王云琦,张洪江,肖江伟,等.重庆缙云山不同土地利用类型土壤结构对土壤抗剪性能的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(3):40-45.
王玉杰,王云琦,夏一平.重庆缙云山典型林分的林地土壤抗蚀抗冲性能[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(1):20-27.
王瑞庆,王晛,李渝曾.基于时间序列ARMAX模型的短期电价预测方法[J].华东电力,2009,37(5):727-730
王志忠,刘秀菊,王树林,等.黄河流域棉花品种产量性状时间序列的ARIMA模型预测研究[J].棉花学报,2007,19(3): 220-226.
王声锋,张展羽,段爱旺,等.豫北地区降水的时间序列特性分析[J].中国农村水利水,2008,(3):13-16.
王永焱.中国黄土研究的新进展[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1985.
汪立刚,武继承,王林娟.保水剂有效使用的土壤水分条件及对小麦的增产效果[J].土壤通报,2003, (1):80-82.
魏景超.真菌鉴定手册.第一版.北京:科学出版社.1979.
魏天,余新晓,朱金兆,等.黄土区防护林主要造林树种水分供需关系研究[J].应用生态学报2001,12 (2):185-189.
吴长文,章梦涛,付奇峰.喷播绿化技术在斜坡水土保持生态环建设中的应用研究[J].水土保持学报, 2000(6):11-14.
吴月茹,王维真,晋锐,等.TDR测定土壤含水量的标定研究[J].冰川冻土,2009,31(2):262-267.
武继承,王志和,何方,等.不同技术措施对降水利用和土壤养分的影响[J].华北农学报,2005,20(6):73-76.
谢影、张金池,黄河、长江流域水土流失现状及森林植被保护对策,南京林业大学学报,2002,26(6):88-92.
谢正辉,曾庆存,戴永久,等.有限元集中质量法在非饱和土壤水流中的应用[J].气候与环境研究,1998,3(1):73-8.
谢正辉,曾庆存,戴永久,等.非饱和流问题的数值模拟研究[J] .中国科学(D辑),1998,28(2):175-180.
许文年,李建林,叶建军.岩石边坡护坡绿化技术应用研究[J].水利水电技术,2002(7):35-36.
许文年,李建林,叶建军,等.清江隔河岩电厂高陡混凝土边坡绿化技术研究.水利水电技术,2003(6):43-46.
杨建伟,韩蕊莲,刘淑明,等.不同土壤水分下杨树的蒸腾变化及抗旱适应性研究[J].西北林学院学报,2004, 19(3): 7-10.
杨娜,王冬梅,王百田等.土壤含水量对紫穗槐蒸腾速率与光合速率影响研究[J].水土保持应用技术, 2006(3):6-9
杨京平.生态恢复工程技术(生态、环境与生态工程丛书)[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
杨柱.深圳城郊废弃石场开发性治理的探索之路[J].水土保持研究,2000,9(3):205-207.
杨学春,董希斌,肖生灵.森林采伐学CAJ课件的研制及应用效果[J].黑龙江教育学院学报, 2004 (5): 57-59.
杨连利,李仲谨,邓娟利.保水剂的研究进展及发展新动向[J ] .材料导报,2005 ,19 (6) :42244.
舒俭民,刘晓春.恢复生态学的理论基础、关键技术与应用前景[J].中国环境科学,1998,18(6):540-543.
姚正学,杨军.岩石坡面土壤菌永久绿化法原理[J].甘肃科学学报,2005,17(4):31-39.
叶建军,许文年.南方岩质坡地生态恢复探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(增1):2245-2249.
张厚华,黄占斌.黄土高原生物气候分区与该区生态系统的恢复[J].干旱区资源与环境,2001,15(1): 64-71.
张国红.我国水土流失现状及其治理对策的探讨[J].林业资源管理,1999,(5):30-33.
张俊,郭浩,王彦辉.干瘠石质山地环境生态工程构建技术[J].世界林业研究. 2005, 18(3): 29-32.
张俊云,周德培,李绍才.岩石边坡生态护坡研究简介[J].水保持通报,2000,20(4) :36-38.
张俊平,刘瑞凤,王爱勤. PAM/凹凸棒粘土复合高吸水性树脂的吸水性能[ J ].高分子材料科学与工程,2006,22(5): 151-158.
张金池,杜天真等.长江中下游山地丘陵区植被恢复与重建[J].中国林业出版社,2006.
张金池,西部喀斯特山区植被的恢复措施[M].中国林业教育,2001,(5) :37-38.
张金池,胡海波.水土保持及防护林学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997.
张光灿,刘霞,贺康宁.黄土半干旱区刺槐和侧柏林地土壤水分有效性及生产力分级研究[J].应用生态学报2003,14(6):858-862.
张明柱,黎庆淮,石秀兰.土壤学与农作学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1994:16-19.
张友炎,刘致远,周泽福等.环境因子对毛乌素沙地紫穗槐光合、蒸腾速率的影响[J].林业科学研究, 2006,19(4):463-466.
张振克.人为裸露坡面植被自然恢复的初步研究[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(1):26-28.
中国科学院南京土壤研究.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.
庄文化,冯浩,吴普特.高分子保水剂农业应用研究进[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(6) :265-270.
赵清侠、贾忠奎,徐程扬.干旱半干旱石质山地困难立地植被恢复技术[J].江西农业大学学报,2004, 26(4):559-565.
赵文智,程国栋.干旱区生态水文过程研究若干问题评述[J].科学通报,2001,46(22) :1851-1857
赵永贵.保水剂的开发及应用进展[J].中国水土保持,1999,(5): 52-54.
赵军子,翁志学.耐盐性高吸水性树脂[J].化工新型材料,2001,(12):12-13.
周德培,张俊云.植被护坡工程技术[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.
诸葛健,王正祥.工业微生物实验技术手册[M].北京:中国轻I一业出版社,1994
宗辉.地质灾害危险性评估的半定量评价方法[J].地质灾害与环境保,2003,(2):51-53.
邹新喜.超强吸水剂(第2版)[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002:473-505.
Achwal W B. Optimum conditions for microbial degradation of poly (vinyl alcohol) in wastewater[J]. Colourage,1997, 44: 47-48.
Allen E B W, Wallace C, Donald A F. Developing the conceptual basis for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 1997, 5 (4):275--276
Arbona V, Iglesias D J, Jacas J, et al. Hydrogel substrate amendment alleviates drought effects on young citrus plants[J]. Plant and Soil,2005,270:73-82.
Boopathy R. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies.Bioresource Technology ,2000 ,74 (1) :63～67
Bosgep, Jenkins G M, Reinsel G C. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control[M].The third edition. NY: Prentice-HallInc, 1994.
Cao Bin, Song Lihua, He Jia, et al. Green High-Grade Highway in Ningxia[D]. Chinese Garden, 2001: 84-86.
Chen Fayang, Cong Peijuan, et al. Slope spray mixed vegetation matrix localization test[J]. China Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, (4): 26-27.
Cregg B M, Zhang J W. Physiology and morphology of Pinus sylvestris from diverse sources under cyclic drought stress[ J ]. Forest Ecology andManagement, 2001, 154: 131-139.
Dane J H,Mathis F H.An adaptive finite difference scheme for the one dimensional water flow equation[J].Soil Sci,1981,45:1048-1054.
Devine D M, Higginbotham C L. Synthesis and characterization of chemically crosslinked N-viny pyrrolidione (NVP) based hydrogels[J]. European PolymerJournal,2005,41:1272-1279.
Dervoot M V,Dougherty M,Watson S. Combining KO-HOEN maps with ARIMA time series model to forecast traffic flow[J].Transportation Research,1996,4(5):307-318.
Du Sheni, Bai Gangshuan, Zhao Shiwei, et al. Effect of wotesuper absorbent and PAM absorbent on soil moisture and growth of potato[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007,23(8):72-79.(in Chinese with English abstract)
Ehrlich H L. How microbes influence mineral growth and dissolution[J ]. Chem ical Geology, 1996, 132: 529.
Ehrlich H L. Geomicrobiology: Its significance for geology [ J ].Earth2Science Reviews, 1998, 45: 45-60. Fanta G F ,Burr R C. [J ] . J Applpolymer sci ,1996 , (10) :926-927.Wu J, Wei Y, Lin J , Lin S. [J ] . Polymer ,2003 ,44 :6513.
Hasio, T C. Plant responses to water stress[ J ]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1973, 24: 519 - 570.
Hegde D M. Effect of soil matric potential , mathod of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on yield , quality , nutrient up take and water use of radish[J ] . Irrig Sci , 1987 , (8) :13-32.Hobbs R J. Towards a conceptual framework of restoration ecology(J.Restoration ecology,1996,4(2):93-110.
Hooker B. S. ,Skeen R. S. Intrinsic bioremediation :an environmental restoration technology. Curr. Opin.Biotechnol. 1996 ,7 :317
Horn R , Taubner H ,Wuttke M. Soil physical properties related to soil structure [J].Soil and Tillage Research , 1994 , 30(2) : 187-216.
Hursh C R. Climatic Factors Controlling Roadside Design and Development[C]//Highway Roadside Dev Com Report, 1949:9-19.
Imanishi A, Murakami K, Imanishi J,etal. Herbaceous plant species richness and species distribution pattern at fragmented forests in Kyoto City .Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 2005,31: 51-56( in Japanese)
IshidaH, HattoriT, TakedaY,et al. Relationship be-tween species richness or species composition and area of fragmented Lucida phallus forests in southeastern Hyogo Prefecture. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 1998,48: 1-16 ( in Japanese)
Janardan S , Singh J . Effect of stockosorb polymers and potassium levels on potato and onion [J ] . Journal of Potassium Research , 1998 ,4(1) :78-82.
Jackson LL, Lopoukine D,Hillyard D. Ecological restoration: a definition and comments. Restoration Ecology, 1995, 3(2): 71-75.
Jinchi Zhang, Hiroyuki Nakamura. Effect of Tree Roots on Soil Erosion Control at Seadikes in the Northern Part of the Hang Zhou Bay(J), China. (日本)砂防学会志,1998(2):5-12.
Krebs C J . Ecology : The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance[J]. New York : Fairfield Graphics, 1978: 225-228.
Ledieu, J.,P.De Ridder, P.De Clerck, and S.Dautrebande.1986. A method of measuring soil moisture by time-domain reflectometry, [J].Hydrol.88:319-328.
LIAN Bin. A study on how silicate bacteria GY92 dissolve potassium from illite [J]. Acta Mineralogical Silica, 1998, 18 (2): 234-237.
LIAN Bin, FU Pinqiu, MO Deming, et al. A comprehensive review of the mechanism of potassium releasing by silicate bacteria[J]. Act mineralogical silica, 2002, 6: 22(2): 179-183.
Liu I S, Rempel G L. Effect of organic solvents on thesynthesis of super absorbents[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science,1997,64:1345-1351.
Liu X, Cheng R-M, XiaoW-. Review and prospect on soil seed bank research. World Forestry Research,2008,21(1): 27-31 ( in Chinese)
Michael S , Johnson , Comelis J Veltkamp. Structure and functioning of water - storing agricultural polycrylamides[J ] . J Sci Food Agri , 1985 ,36 :789 -793.
Milena Holmgren, Marten Scheffer . ELN in as a window of opportunity for the restoration of degraded arid Ecosystems [J]. Ecosystems, 2001 (4) : 151- 159.
NaganoM. Study of the Vegetation Restoration with Forest Top soil Spraying. Osaka: Study of Improving the Nazina T N1 Physiological and phylogenetic diversity of aerobic sap rot orphic bacteria from the Daqing Oilfield [J].Microbiology , 2000 ,69 (1): 89-951Mino River Dam Natrual Recovery, 1980 ( in Japanese)
Omidian H J, Rocca G, Park K. Advanced in super porous hydro gels [J]. Journal of Controlled elease,2005,102:3-12. Panl, Warrick A W, Wierenga P J. Finite elements methods for simulation water flow in variably saturated porous media:numerical oscillation and mass distributed schemes[J].Water Resources Research,1996,32:1883-1889.
Silberbush M, Adear E, De Malach Y. Use of an hydrophilic polymer to improve water storage and availability to crops grown in sand dunesI. Corn irrigated by trickling [ J ] . Agricultural Water Management 1993 ,23 :303 -313.
Rensburg -L -van, et. al. Comparative analysis of differential drought stress - induced supp cession of and recovery in carbon dioxide fixation: stomatal and non - stomata limitation in Nicotiana tabacum L [ J ]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1993, 142 (3) : 296 - 306.
Topp.G.C.J.L.Davis&A.P.Annan.1980, Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines[J].Water Resources Research,V. 16. No.3:574-58
Watanabe K. Microorganisms relevant to bioremediation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology ,2001 ,12 :237-241
Yokotas, Fukudat L ,Wombats A, et al. The effect of rain water in filtration with a slope of pyroclastic deposits, recorded using automated electric prospecting [J]. Bulletin of engineering Geology and the Environment, 1998, 57(1): 51-58.
Yamadera Y. Study of the vegetation restoration of the subalpine zone. Revegetation Technology, 1976, 3: 1-32 ( in Japanese) ZhangY-M, PanK-W,et al. Potential contribution of the soil seed banks to the restoration of native plants. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biolog, 2003,9(3): 326-332 ( in Chinese)
全国土壤菌工法永久绿化协会(日).土壤微生物による永久绿化工法——土壤菌工法解说资料(内部资料)
包维楷,陈庆恒.退化山地植被恢复和重建的基本理论和方法[J].长江流域资源与环境, 1998, 7(4): 371-376.
柏明娥,洪利兴,钱华等.浙江省海宁市尖山区鼠尾山露采矿山植被恢复技术[J].中国水土保持科学. 2006,4(Supp.): 150-155.伯杰.细菌鉴定手册(第八版) .
曹兵,宋丽华,何嘉,等.谈宁夏高等级高速公路的绿化[D].中国园林,2001:84-86.
长江水利委员会长江科学院.裸露岩坡快速植生技术.,中国科技成果库——项目年度编号:99033067.
川岛和夫.农用土壤改良剂——新型保水剂[J].姚德兴摘译.土壤学进展,1986,3:49-52.
崔英德,郭建维,阎文峰,等.SA-IP-SPS型保水剂及其对土壤物理性能的影响[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(1):28-31.
陈兵,曹子龙,杨望涛,等.客土喷播在霍林河矿山植被恢复中的应用[J].山西建筑,2009,30(35):340-342.
陈波,包志毅.国外采石场的生态和景观恢复[J].水土保持学报.2003,17(5):70-73.
陈法杨,丛佩娟等.边坡喷混植生基质材料本地化试验[J].中国水土保持, 2005,(4): 26-27.
陈芳清,卢斌,王祥荣.樟村坪磷矿废弃地植物群落的形成与演替[J].生态学报,2001,21(8):1347-1353.
陈辉跃.闽南裸露山体整治与植被恢复技术初探[J].亚热带水土保持,2007,19(1) :59-61,68.
陈密峰,张秀娟,杨健茂.反相悬浮法合成高耐盐性的超强吸水剂[J].精细化工,2002 ,19(9) :543-547.
陈家宙,陈明亮,陈圆球.各具特色的当代土壤水分测量技术[J].湖北农业科学,2001(3):25-28.
陈平雁,黄浙明.spss10.0统计软件高级应用教程[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2004.
陈平雁,黄浙明.spss13.0统计软件应用教程[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.
陈志明.草坪建植与养护[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003.
东秀珠,蔡妙英.常见细菌系统鉴定手册.科学出版社.2001.2.
丁运华.关于生态恢复几个问题的讨论[J].中国沙漠, 2000, 20(3): 341-344.
刘茂祥,王林,王振东.浅析水稻节水灌溉技术适宜控制的方法[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2005,3(2):56 -57.
介晓磊,李有田,韩燕来,等.保水剂对土壤持水性的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2000,34(1):22-24.
丁访军,钟洪明,潘明亮等.赤水河下游不同林地类型土壤物理特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报, 2009,23 (3):179-183,231.
杜鹃.客土喷播施工法在日本的应用与发展[J].公路,2000,(7):72-74.
杜社妮,白岗栓,赵世伟,等.沃特和PAM保水剂对土壤水分及马铃薯生长的影响研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(8): 72-79.
杜晓东,王丽娟,刘作新.保水剂及其在节水农业上的应用[J].河南农业大学学报,2000,34(3):255-259.
樊慧萍,张复兴,田立新.山西省公路绿化树种的多样性选择[J].山西林业科技,2005,(3)45-46.
方华,林建平.植被护坡现状与展望[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):283-285.
顾宗濂.中国富营养化湖泊的生物修复.农村生态环境,2002,18 (1):42-45.
郭连声,田有亮. 4种针叶幼树光合速率、蒸腾速率与土壤含水量的关系及其抗旱性研究[J].应用生态学报, 1994, 5(1): 32-36.
贺康宁,田阳,史常青,等.黄土半干旱区集水造林条件下林木生长适宜的土壤水分环境[J].林业科学, 2003, 39(1): 10-16.
胡聃,奚增均.生态恢复工程系统集成原理的一些理论分析[J].生态学报,2002,22(6): 866-877.
胡海波,王琛瑞,张金池.太湖流域宜溧山区水土流失防治分区技术,南京林业大学学报,2002,26(6):33-36.
胡建忠,周心澄,李文忠,等.退耕地青海云杉人工林土壤抗冲性试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(6):6-10.
胡永红,吴志峰,李定强,等.基于ARIMA模型的区域水生态足迹时间序列分析[J].生态环境,2006,15(1):94-98.
黄义瑞,田积莹,雍绍萍.土壤内在性质对对侵蚀影响的研究[J].水土保持学报,1989,(3):9-14.
黄进,张金池.苏州市空气质量的时间序列变化过程研究[J].环境科学与技术,2009,32(6): 49-52..
黄敬军,倪红升.江苏省矿业废弃地类型及其环境恢复整治模式建议[J].西北地质,2005(增刊):24-246.
黄敬军,高德云.江苏生态省建设中矿产资源合理开发利用问题的研究[J] .地质灾害与环境保,2004,15 (3):1-5.
黄敬军,李向前,陆华.江苏省露采矿山地质环境综合评价研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2005 ,(5):97- 100.
黄占斌.农用保水剂应用原理与技术[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2005:1-3.
黄占斌,万会娥,邓西平,等.保水剂在改良土壤和作物抗旱节水中的效应[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(4):2-55.
黄志霖,傅伯杰,陈利顶.恢复生态学与黄土高原生态系统的恢复与重建问题[J].水土保持学报, 2002, 16(3): 122-125.
江浩浩,董希斌,王海飙边坡土壤含水率对不同植被土壤抗剪强度的影响森林工程2009,25 (3):77-80.
姜小三,倪绍祥,潘剑君,等.温度条件对TDR测定土壤水分的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2004,(4):102-104.
李保国,龚元石,左强,等.农田土壤水动态模型及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2000,107-131.
李捍东,梁近光,钟阳,等.优势复合菌群用于城市生活污水净化新技术的研究.环境科学研究,2000,13 (5):14-16.
李宏艳,梁冰,苏荣华.土壤水热迁移问题的混合有限元法[J].灌溉排水,2002,21(1):49-52.
李辉华,郭弘艺,唐文乔,等.ARIMA模型在预测长江靖江段沿岸鱼类渔获量时间格局中的应用[J].水产学报, 2008, 32(6):899-905.
李景生,黄韵竹.土壤保水剂的吸水保水性能研究动态[J].中国沙漠,1996,16(1):86-91.
李俊,舒为群,陈济安,等1降解DBP菌株CQ0302的分离鉴定及其降解特性[J].中国环境科学,2005,25(1):47-511.
李文华,刘广权,马松涛,等.干旱胁迫对苗木蒸腾耗水和生长的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报, 2004, 32(1):61-65.
李旭光,毛文碧,徐福有.日本的公路边坡绿化与防护——1994年赴日本考察报告[J].公路交通科技, 1995, 12(2): 59-64.
李旭光,毛文碧,涂相有.日本的公路边坡绿化[J].公路交通科技.1995,12(2):59-64.
李毅,王全九,王文焰,等.入渗、再分布和蒸发条件下一维土壤水运动的数值模拟[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(1):5-8.
李云开,杨培岭,刘洪禄.保水剂农业应用及其效应研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(2):182-187.
雷志栋,杨诗秀.非饱和土壤水一维流动的数值计算[J].土壤学报,1982,19(2):141-153.
雷志栋,胡和平,杨诗秀.土壤水研究进展与评述[J].水科学进展,1999,10(3):311-318.
陆垂裕,裴源生.适应复杂上表面边界条件的一维土壤水运动数值模型[J].水利科学,2007,38(2):136-142.
吕岁菊,李春光.土壤水——盐运移规律数值模拟研究综述[J].农业科学研究,2005,26(1):107-131.
林乃正,张凤英.攀援植物[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1984.
连宾.硅酸盐细菌GY92对伊利石的释钾作用[J].矿物学报, 1998,18(2): 234-237.
连宾,傅平秋,莫德明,等.硅酸盐细菌解钾作用机理的综合效应[J].矿物学报, 2002,22(2): 179-183.
梁爱学,李统益,王清茹,等.植生带边坡防护技术研究[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版).2007,(4): 163-166.
梁爱学,王欢,晏晓林,等.营养袋技术在边坡植被防护中的应用[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版).2007,3:58-61.
梁春,林植芳,孔国辉.不同光强下生长的亚热带树苗的光合光响应特性的比较[J].应用生态学报, 1997, 8(1):7-11
刘本同,钱华,何志华,等.我国岩石边坡植被修复技术现状和展望[J].浙江林业科技, 2004,24(3):47-55.
刘春霞,韩烈保.高速公路边坡植被恢复研究进展[J].生态学报.2007,27(5):2900-2908.
刘刚,李红丽,董智,孙明高.泰山抽水蓄能电站扰动区不同植被恢复措施效果研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(6): 41-45.
刘国恩,康政虹.南京市露采矿山存在的环境问题与整治建议[J].江苏地质, 2005,29 (2):112-115.
刘国华、张金池,南京幕府山矿区废弃地植被恢复模式研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(1):141-144.
刘国华、张金池,南京幕府山构树种群的空间分布格局[J].南京林业大学学报,2005,29(1):104-106.
刘桂元.浏阳磷矿边坡植被护坡试验研究[J].冶金矿山设计与建设,1997,6:58-61.
刘建宁,高洪文,王运琦,等,山西太旧高速公路边坡绿化种草技术研究[J].中国草地,1999,(6): 23-26.
刘建培.福泉高速公路边坡植物选择[J].中国城市林业.2005,3(3):40-42.
刘青松,左平,邹欣庆,等.吴县市露天采矿区生态重建与环太湖地区生态旅游模式的契合[J].生态学杂志.2003,22(1):73-78.
刘向东.秦沈客运专线路基边坡植被防护设计与施工技术[J].岩土工程技术.2002,(1):60-62.
刘询.岩质边坡的生态恢复工程新技术研究[J].广东水利水电.2001,(5):21-22.
刘永兵,蒲万芬,杨燕,等. AA/AM二元共聚超强吸水剂的合成[J].材料科学与工艺,2007 ,15(5):723-726.
刘玉华,贾志宽,史纪安等.旱作条件下不同苜蓿品种光合作用的日变化[J].生态学报,2006,26(5):1468-1471.
刘骅,林英华,王西和,等.长期配施秸秆对灰漠土质量的影响[J].生态环境,2007,16(5): 1492-1497.
柳长顺,齐实.深圳市裸露山体缺口景观影响程度研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):36-38.
娄仲连.岩质边坡的生态恢复工程新技术研究[J].地下空间,2001,(4):318-323.
陆子锋.深圳市裸露山体缺口整治技术探讨[J].水土保持通报.2002,22(5):55-56,73.
马海天才,廖心北.边坡生物防护研究现状初探[J].四川草原,2003(3):15-16.
江苏省地质调查研究院.江苏省矿山地质环境调查与评估报告[R]. 2006.
钱华,柏明娥,刘本同等.岩质边坡绿化过程中人工土壤的重建[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4:83-86.
彭少麟.恢复生态学与植被重建.生态科学,1996 , 15 (2) :26-31.
任海,彭少麟.恢复生态学导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
沈萍,范秀容,李广武.微生物学实验[M].第3版.北京:高等教育出版社, 1999.
沈恒胜,陈君琛,汤葆莎,等.稻草品质促变因素的系统评价与秸秆种类品质比较[J].福建农业学报,2003,18(12): 222-226.
宋永昌.植被生态学.上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2001.598-599.
宋永昌.生态恢复是生态科学的最终试验[J].中国生态学会通讯,1997,(4) :4-5.
唐启义,冯明光.DPS数据处理系统[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
田晶会,贺康宁,王百田等.不同土壤水分下黄土高原侧柏生理生态特点分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):175-178.
王爱勤,张俊平.有机-无机复合高吸水性树脂研究进展与发展趋势[J].功能材料,2006,3(5):14218.
王百田,张府娥.黄土高原主要造林树种苗木蒸腾耗水特性[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2003,27(6):93-97.
王百田,杨雪松.黄土半干旱地区油松与侧柏林分适宜土壤含水量研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,16 (1) :80-83.
王琛瑞、张金池,太湖流域水土流失影响因素及土壤侵蚀预报模型,南京林业大学学报,2000,24(6):31-35.
王得祥,康博文,刘建军,等.主要城市绿化树种苗木耗水特性研究[J].西北林学院学报, 2004, 19(4): 20-23.
王海珍,梁宗锁,韩蕊莲,等.不同土壤水分条件下黄土高原乡土树种耗水规律研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(6):57-63.
王燕,宋凤斌,刘阳,等.高植物篱种植模式及其应用中存在的问题[J].广西农业生物科学,2006,25(4):369-374.
王国祥.微生物在污染环境生物修复中的应用[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(3):198-202.
王云琦,张洪江,肖江伟,等.重庆缙云山不同土地利用类型土壤结构对土壤抗剪性能的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(3):40-45.
王玉杰,王云琦,夏一平.重庆缙云山典型林分的林地土壤抗蚀抗冲性能[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(1):20-27.
王瑞庆,王晛,李渝曾.基于时间序列ARMAX模型的短期电价预测方法[J].华东电力,2009,37(5):727-730
王志忠,刘秀菊,王树林,等.黄河流域棉花品种产量性状时间序列的ARIMA模型预测研究[J].棉花学报,2007,19(3): 220-226.
王声锋,张展羽,段爱旺,等.豫北地区降水的时间序列特性分析[J].中国农村水利水,2008,(3):13-16.
王永焱.中国黄土研究的新进展[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1985.
汪立刚,武继承,王林娟.保水剂有效使用的土壤水分条件及对小麦的增产效果[J].土壤通报,2003, (1):80-82.
魏景超.真菌鉴定手册.第一版.北京:科学出版社.1979.
魏天,余新晓,朱金兆,等.黄土区防护林主要造林树种水分供需关系研究[J].应用生态学报2001,12 (2):185-189.
吴长文,章梦涛,付奇峰.喷播绿化技术在斜坡水土保持生态环建设中的应用研究[J].水土保持学报, 2000(6):11-14.
吴月茹,王维真,晋锐,等.TDR测定土壤含水量的标定研究[J].冰川冻土,2009,31(2):262-267.
武继承,王志和,何方,等.不同技术措施对降水利用和土壤养分的影响[J].华北农学报,2005,20(6):73-76.
谢影、张金池,黄河、长江流域水土流失现状及森林植被保护对策,南京林业大学学报,2002,26(6):88-92.
谢正辉,曾庆存,戴永久,等.有限元集中质量法在非饱和土壤水流中的应用[J].气候与环境研究,1998,3(1):73-8.
谢正辉,曾庆存,戴永久,等.非饱和流问题的数值模拟研究[J] .中国科学(D辑),1998,28(2):175-180.
许文年,李建林,叶建军.岩石边坡护坡绿化技术应用研究[J].水利水电技术,2002(7):35-36.
许文年,李建林,叶建军,等.清江隔河岩电厂高陡混凝土边坡绿化技术研究.水利水电技术,2003(6):43-46.
杨建伟,韩蕊莲,刘淑明,等.不同土壤水分下杨树的蒸腾变化及抗旱适应性研究[J].西北林学院学报,2004, 19(3): 7-10.
杨娜,王冬梅,王百田等.土壤含水量对紫穗槐蒸腾速率与光合速率影响研究[J].水土保持应用技术, 2006(3):6-9
杨京平.生态恢复工程技术(生态、环境与生态工程丛书)[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
杨柱.深圳城郊废弃石场开发性治理的探索之路[J].水土保持研究,2000,9(3):205-207.
杨学春,董希斌,肖生灵.森林采伐学CAJ课件的研制及应用效果[J].黑龙江教育学院学报, 2004 (5): 57-59.
杨连利,李仲谨,邓娟利.保水剂的研究进展及发展新动向[J ] .材料导报,2005 ,19 (6) :42244.
舒俭民,刘晓春.恢复生态学的理论基础、关键技术与应用前景[J].中国环境科学,1998,18(6):540-543.
姚正学,杨军.岩石坡面土壤菌永久绿化法原理[J].甘肃科学学报,2005,17(4):31-39.
叶建军,许文年.南方岩质坡地生态恢复探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(增1):2245-2249.
张厚华,黄占斌.黄土高原生物气候分区与该区生态系统的恢复[J].干旱区资源与环境,2001,15(1): 64-71.
张国红.我国水土流失现状及其治理对策的探讨[J].林业资源管理,1999,(5):30-33.
张俊,郭浩,王彦辉.干瘠石质山地环境生态工程构建技术[J].世界林业研究. 2005, 18(3): 29-32.
张俊云,周德培,李绍才.岩石边坡生态护坡研究简介[J].水保持通报,2000,20(4) :36-38.
张俊平,刘瑞凤,王爱勤. PAM/凹凸棒粘土复合高吸水性树脂的吸水性能[ J ].高分子材料科学与工程,2006,22(5): 151-158.
张金池,杜天真等.长江中下游山地丘陵区植被恢复与重建[J].中国林业出版社,2006.
张金池,西部喀斯特山区植被的恢复措施[M].中国林业教育,2001,(5) :37-38.
张金池,胡海波.水土保持及防护林学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997.
张光灿,刘霞,贺康宁.黄土半干旱区刺槐和侧柏林地土壤水分有效性及生产力分级研究[J].应用生态学报2003,14(6):858-862.
张明柱,黎庆淮,石秀兰.土壤学与农作学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1994:16-19.
张友炎,刘致远,周泽福等.环境因子对毛乌素沙地紫穗槐光合、蒸腾速率的影响[J].林业科学研究, 2006,19(4):463-466.
张振克.人为裸露坡面植被自然恢复的初步研究[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(1):26-28.
中国科学院南京土壤研究.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.
庄文化,冯浩,吴普特.高分子保水剂农业应用研究进[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(6) :265-270.
赵清侠、贾忠奎,徐程扬.干旱半干旱石质山地困难立地植被恢复技术[J].江西农业大学学报,2004, 26(4):559-565.
赵文智,程国栋.干旱区生态水文过程研究若干问题评述[J].科学通报,2001,46(22) :1851-1857
赵永贵.保水剂的开发及应用进展[J].中国水土保持,1999,(5): 52-54.
赵军子,翁志学.耐盐性高吸水性树脂[J].化工新型材料,2001,(12):12-13.
周德培,张俊云.植被护坡工程技术[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.
诸葛健,王正祥.工业微生物实验技术手册[M].北京:中国轻I一业出版社,1994
宗辉.地质灾害危险性评估的半定量评价方法[J].地质灾害与环境保,2003,(2):51-53.
邹新喜.超强吸水剂(第2版)[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002:473-505.
Achwal W B. Optimum conditions for microbial degradation of poly (vinyl alcohol) in wastewater[J]. Colourage,1997, 44: 47-48.
Allen E B W, Wallace C, Donald A F. Developing the conceptual basis for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 1997, 5 (4):275--276
Arbona V, Iglesias D J, Jacas J, et al. Hydrogel substrate amendment alleviates drought effects on young citrus plants[J]. Plant and Soil,2005,270:73-82.
Boopathy R. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies.Bioresource Technology ,2000 ,74 (1) :63～67
Bosgep, Jenkins G M, Reinsel G C. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control[M].The third edition. NY: Prentice-HallInc, 1994.
Cao Bin, Song Lihua, He Jia, et al. Green High-Grade Highway in Ningxia[D]. Chinese Garden, 2001: 84-86.
Chen Fayang, Cong Peijuan, et al. Slope spray mixed vegetation matrix localization test[J]. China Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, (4): 26-27.
Cregg B M, Zhang J W. Physiology and morphology of Pinus sylvestris from diverse sources under cyclic drought stress[ J ]. Forest Ecology andManagement, 2001, 154: 131-139.
Dane J H,Mathis F H.An adaptive finite difference scheme for the one dimensional water flow equation[J].Soil Sci,1981,45:1048-1054.
Devine D M, Higginbotham C L. Synthesis and characterization of chemically crosslinked N-viny pyrrolidione (NVP) based hydrogels[J]. European PolymerJournal,2005,41:1272-1279.
Dervoot M V,Dougherty M,Watson S. Combining KO-HOEN maps with ARIMA time series model to forecast traffic flow[J].Transportation Research,1996,4(5):307-318.
Du Sheni, Bai Gangshuan, Zhao Shiwei, et al. Effect of wotesuper absorbent and PAM absorbent on soil moisture and growth of potato[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007,23(8):72-79.(in Chinese with English abstract)
Ehrlich H L. How microbes influence mineral growth and dissolution[J ]. Chem ical Geology, 1996, 132: 529.
Ehrlich H L. Geomicrobiology: Its significance for geology [ J ].Earth2Science Reviews, 1998, 45: 45-60. Fanta G F ,Burr R C. [J ] . J Applpolymer sci ,1996 , (10) :926-927.Wu J, Wei Y, Lin J , Lin S. [J ] . Polymer ,2003 ,44 :6513.
Hasio, T C. Plant responses to water stress[ J ]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1973, 24: 519 - 570.
Hegde D M. Effect of soil matric potential , mathod of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on yield , quality , nutrient up take and water use of radish[J ] . Irrig Sci , 1987 , (8) :13-32.Hobbs R J. Towards a conceptual framework of restoration ecology(J.Restoration ecology,1996,4(2):93-110.
Hooker B. S. ,Skeen R. S. Intrinsic bioremediation :an environmental restoration technology. Curr. Opin.Biotechnol. 1996 ,7 :317
Horn R , Taubner H ,Wuttke M. Soil physical properties related to soil structure [J].Soil and Tillage Research , 1994 , 30(2) : 187-216.
Hursh C R. Climatic Factors Controlling Roadside Design and Development[C]//Highway Roadside Dev Com Report, 1949:9-19.
Imanishi A, Murakami K, Imanishi J,etal. Herbaceous plant species richness and species distribution pattern at fragmented forests in Kyoto City .Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 2005,31: 51-56( in Japanese)
IshidaH, HattoriT, TakedaY,et al. Relationship be-tween species richness or species composition and area of fragmented Lucida phallus forests in southeastern Hyogo Prefecture. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 1998,48: 1-16 ( in Japanese)
Janardan S , Singh J . Effect of stockosorb polymers and potassium levels on potato and onion [J ] . Journal of Potassium Research , 1998 ,4(1) :78-82.
Jackson LL, Lopoukine D,Hillyard D. Ecological restoration: a definition and comments. Restoration Ecology, 1995, 3(2): 71-75.
Jinchi Zhang, Hiroyuki Nakamura. Effect of Tree Roots on Soil Erosion Control at Seadikes in the Northern Part of the Hang Zhou Bay(J), China. (日本)砂防学会志,1998(2):5-12.
Krebs C J . Ecology : The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance[J]. New York : Fairfield Graphics, 1978: 225-228.
Ledieu, J.,P.De Ridder, P.De Clerck, and S.Dautrebande.1986. A method of measuring soil moisture by time-domain reflectometry, [J].Hydrol.88:319-328.
LIAN Bin. A study on how silicate bacteria GY92 dissolve potassium from illite [J]. Acta Mineralogical Silica, 1998, 18 (2): 234-237.
LIAN Bin, FU Pinqiu, MO Deming, et al. A comprehensive review of the mechanism of potassium releasing by silicate bacteria[J]. Act mineralogical silica, 2002, 6: 22(2): 179-183.
Liu I S, Rempel G L. Effect of organic solvents on thesynthesis of super absorbents[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science,1997,64:1345-1351.
Liu X, Cheng R-M, XiaoW-. Review and prospect on soil seed bank research. World Forestry Research,2008,21(1): 27-31 ( in Chinese)
Michael S , Johnson , Comelis J Veltkamp. Structure and functioning of water - storing agricultural polycrylamides[J ] . J Sci Food Agri , 1985 ,36 :789 -793.
Milena Holmgren, Marten Scheffer . ELN in as a window of opportunity for the restoration of degraded arid Ecosystems [J]. Ecosystems, 2001 (4) : 151- 159.
NaganoM. Study of the Vegetation Restoration with Forest Top soil Spraying. Osaka: Study of Improving the Nazina T N1 Physiological and phylogenetic diversity of aerobic sap rot orphic bacteria from the Daqing Oilfield [J].Microbiology , 2000 ,69 (1): 89-951Mino River Dam Natrual Recovery, 1980 ( in Japanese)
Omidian H J, Rocca G, Park K. Advanced in super porous hydro gels [J]. Journal of Controlled elease,2005,102:3-12. Panl, Warrick A W, Wierenga P J. Finite elements methods for simulation water flow in variably saturated porous media:numerical oscillation and mass distributed schemes[J].Water Resources Research,1996,32:1883-1889.
Silberbush M, Adear E, De Malach Y. Use of an hydrophilic polymer to improve water storage and availability to crops grown in sand dunesI. Corn irrigated by trickling [ J ] . Agricultural Water Management 1993 ,23 :303 -313.
Rensburg -L -van, et. al. Comparative analysis of differential drought stress - induced supp cession of and recovery in carbon dioxide fixation: stomatal and non - stomata limitation in Nicotiana tabacum L [ J ]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1993, 142 (3) : 296 - 306.
Topp.G.C.J.L.Davis&A.P.Annan.1980, Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines[J].Water Resources Research,V. 16. No.3:574-58
Watanabe K. Microorganisms relevant to bioremediation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology ,2001 ,12 :237-241
Yokotas, Fukudat L ,Wombats A, et al. The effect of rain water in filtration with a slope of pyroclastic deposits, recorded using automated electric prospecting [J]. Bulletin of engineering Geology and the Environment, 1998, 57(1): 51-58.
Yamadera Y. Study of the vegetation restoration of the subalpine zone. Revegetation Technology, 1976, 3: 1-32 ( in Japanese) ZhangY-M, PanK-W,et al. Potential contribution of the soil seed banks to the restoration of native plants. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biolog, 2003,9(3): 326-332 ( in Chinese)
全国土壤菌工法永久绿化协会(日).土壤微生物による永久绿化工法——土壤菌工法解说资料(内部资料)
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |