用户名: 密码: 验证码:
青藏高原高寒草甸人工草地生产力和稳定性关系的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文以青藏高原高寒草甸三种常见禾本科牧草垂穗披碱草(Elymus nutans)、中华羊茅(Festuca.Sinensis)、羊茅(Festuca ovina)为材料,进行人工混播草地生产力和稳定性及其调控机制的研究。经三年的人工种植,测定和分析研究,得以下几方面的结论。
     (1)多年生混播草地生长期长,比天然草地提前10天左右返青,与天然草地同步成熟枯黄。
     (2)草地建成以后,单播草地在第三年开始减产(羊茅单播地例外),2种混播草地和3种混播草地在草地建植第二年和第三年连续高产,草地中的杂草丰富度和杂草生物量变化幅度小,其产量稳定性和种稳定性明显优于单播草地,3种混播草地又优于2种混播草地。在高寒地区,多年生禾草草地可以实现高产的目的,混播组合可以达到稳产的效果。
     (3)垂穗披碱草、中华羊茅和羊茅在出苗期表现出竞争差异,形成初步的竞争格局,草地建植第二年,幼苗期形成的竞争格局不变,垂穗披碱草占优势。草地建植第三年,羊茅较高的成株存活率增加了其竞争力。
     (4)混播草地建植第二年,垂穗披碱草/中华羊茅,垂穗披碱草/羊茅混播中,组分种由共享资源、种间无干扰,向着相互竞争的趋势发展;中华羊茅和羊茅混播,相互无干扰;3种物种的竞争等级为垂穗披碱草最强,中华羊茅次之,羊茅最差。草地建植第三年,在混播组合中,组分种之间争夺资源,相互干扰,垂穗披碱草竞争力最强,羊茅第二,中华羊茅第三,物种的竞争等级发生了变化。
     (5)施肥增强了人工草地群落中垂穗披碱草对水平空间的竞争力,中华羊茅和羊茅对垂直空间的竞争潜力增强,同时降低了草地中杂草生物量及丰富度,有效提高草地生产力的同时,维持了群落的稳定性。
     (6)刈割降低了草地牧草的产草量,草地中的杂草生物量和杂草丰富度增加,草地的产量稳定性和组分种的稳定性受到影响。在草地建植第一年,不能采取任何形式的利用,但是在建植第二年第三年可以对混播草地进行适度利用(一年刈割两次),适当提前第一次刈割的时间(如开花期),并缩短两次刈割的间隔,留茬以6cm较为适宜。
     (7)初始播种密度对二龄草地有一定的调控作用,适宜的密度能有效提高草地的产草量,降低草地中的杂草生物量及杂草丰富度,有利于维系草地的产量稳定性和组分稳定性。草地建植第三年,初始密度对牧草产量的调控作用和杂草的抑制作用减小。
     (8)高寒人工草地建植当年,禾草的侵占力较小,一年生阔叶杂草在草地中(尤其是单播中)占优势地位,其中,萼果香薷,白黎,甘青蒿对草地的危害程度最大;草地建植第二年和第三年,禾草较早返青,在草地中占据了优势,草地中许多杂草频度较低,对草地影响较小,二龄和三龄草地产草量虽然处于高峰期,但是杂草的防治工作不容忽视。
The experiment chooses three kinds of perennial grasses,Elymus nutans, Festuca.sinensis and Festuca ovina,which distributed widely in the east of Qinghai-Tibetan alpine meadow to study the productivity and stability of cultivated grassland.The experiment experience three years and the main conclusions as following:
     1.The re-growth period of cultivated grassland was 10 days ahead of natural pasture and the mature period was same.
     2.After establishment,the productivity of monoculture perennial grassland began to decrease in the third year(the F.ovina grassland was exceptional).Those of 2 species combined mixtures and 3 species combined mixture keep high production continuously in the second and third years and the change of weed biomass and weed abundance was unconspicuous.The stability of production and component in mixture grassland was better than in monoculture grassland and the 3 species combined mixture was the best. The mixture grassland of perennial grass can achieve the high production in alpine meadow.
     3.The initial competitive pattern was formed between E.nutans,F. sinensis and F.ovina in the seeding emergence stage and the pattern was not changed in the second year.E.nutans was dominant species and F. sinensis and F.ovina were inferior species in mixtures.In the third year, the highest adult survival increased F.ovina competitive ability in mixture.The adult survival ability of E.nutans,F.sinensis were second and third.
     4.In E.nutans/F.sinensis and E.nutans/F.ovina mixtures,the combined components utilized the same resource and showed competitive trend in higher seeding densities and the combined components in F.sinensis/F. ovina mixture utilized the same resource in the second year.The competition ability of E.nutans was the strongest,then F.sinensis, followed F.ovina based on Relative Yield Total and Competition Ratio.In the third year,the combined components competed the same resource and interfered each other in three mixtures.The competitive ability of E. nutans was the strongest,F.ovina was the second and F.sinensis was the third.
     5.Fertilizer improved the horizontal competitive ability of dominant population(E.nutans)and improve the upright competitive ability of inferior population(F.sinensis and F.ovina).At the same time,it decreased weed biomass and weed abundance in mixture grassland.The production of grassland increased lineally due to fertilizer,the stability can be improved as well.
     6.Clipping decreased the production and increased the weed biomass and weed abundance in mixtures.The cultivated grassland must not be used by any way in the first year and can be utilized moderately in the second and third year.6cm stubble,2 clipping annually,the first clipping in the blooming stage of grass,the second clipping in the elongating stage of grass was the ideal clipping management for mixture grassland of perennial grass in the alpine region of Gannan area.
     7.The mezzo seeding density could increase the grassland production effectively and decreased the weed biomass and weed abundance in grassland in the second year.seeding density was effective way to maintain the stability of production and combined component in cultivated grassland. The seeding density effect on the grassland production was minished in the third year.
     8.In the first year of grassland establishment,the aggressivity of grass was relatively low,and they failed to compete with the weed.The annual weed were compete winners such as E.patrini Garcke,Artemisia tangutica and Chenopodium Album.The seeding grass re-growth early and became dominate population in grassland in the second and third year.The frequency of many weed were decreased and had no serious effect on grassland production.The production of grassland achieved fastigium in the second and third year but the work of weed removed was still a serious question.
引文
01.杜峰,梁宗锁,胡莉娟.2004.植物竞争研究综述.生态学报.3(4):157-163.
    02.王刚,张大勇.1996.生物竞争理论.陕西科学技术出版出版社,西安.
    03.常会宁,刘春起,李固江,刘忠德.1997.刘割对羊茅黑麦草和无芒雀麦集转化的影响.草业学报.6(1).53-56.
    04.车敦仁.1995.高寒牧区栽培禾草施氮的效应曲线及其变化.草业学报.4:1-8.
    05.陈宝书,温尚文.1985.主要栽培牧草根系的研究.四川草原.4:30-36.
    06.陈默君,贾慎修.2002.中国饲用植物.北京:中国农业出版社,119-120.
    07.陈银萍.2000.祁连山青海云杉种群结构组建稳定性机制研究.硕士学位论文.甘肃农业大学.
    08.董世魁,胡自治.2000.人工草地群落稳定性及其调控机制研究现状,草原与草坪.3:3-8.
    09.董世魁,蒲小朋,马金星,石振田.2001.甘肃天祝高寒地区燕麦品种生产性能评价.草地学报.9(2):44-49.
    10.董世魁.2001.高寒地区多年生禾草混播草地群落稳定性及其调控机制.甘肃农业大学博士学位论文.
    11.杜国祯,王刚1995.甘南亚高山草甸人工草地的演替和质量变化。植物学报,37(4):306-313.
    12.杜国祯,王刚1998.垂穗披碱草个体大小与种群密度的关系.植物生态学报.22(6):552-558.
    13.樊江文,在不同压力和干扰条件下鸭茅和黑麦草的竞争研究.草业学报.1997.6(3):23-31.
    14.范青慈.2000.青海省退化草地现状及防治对策.青海草业.1:22-24.
    15.顾梦鹤,杜晓光,文淑均,马涛,陈敏,任青吉,杜国祯.2008.施肥和刈割对垂穗披碱草、中华羊茅和羊茅种间竞争力影响的研究.生态学报.28(6):2472-2479.
    16.韩建国,韩永伟,孙铁军等.2004.农牧交错带退耕还草对土壤有机质和氮的影响.草业学报.13(4):21-28.
    17.1 何玮,张新全,杨春华.2006.刈割次数、施肥量及混播比例对牛鞭草和白三叶混播草地牧草品质的影响.草业科学.23(4):39-42.
    18.和占星,黄梅芬,杨国荣,黄必志.云南温带地区放牧草地长期维持施肥量的研究.草业科学.1992.9(1):26-30.
    19.黄建辉.1994.生态系统内的物种多样性对稳定性的影响.生物多样性研究的原理和方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社.
    20.兰玉荣.2004.青藏高原高寒草甸草地退化现状及治理对策,青海草业.13(1):27-30.
    21.李昂,吕正文,顾梦鹤,周显辉,杜国祯,2008.草业学报.施肥和刈割对混播草地产量的影响.25(7).
    22.李本银,汪金舫,赵世杰,张宏伟,赵明旭.2004.施肥对退化草地土壤肥力、牧草群落结构及生物量的影响.中国草地.26(1):14-17.
    23.李博,陈家宽,A.R.沃金森.1998.植物竞争研究进展.植物学通报.15(4):18-29.
    24.李博主编.1993.普通生态学内蒙古大学出版社.
    25.李楠.宋建国,刘伟.2001.龚长虹草原施肥对牧草产量和质量的作用及其经济效益分析.黑龙江农业科学.2:16-18.
    26.李志华,聂朝相,陈宝书.1994.氮磷钾肥单施与混施对燕麦产草量的影响.草业科学, 11(4):24-26.
    27.陆光平,聂斌,2002.垂穗披碱草利用价值评价.草业科学.19(9):13-15.
    28.陆明华,罗光恒,邓承德.1995.放牧条件下不同牧草品种混播组合的研究.草业科学.12(6):39-41.
    29.罗燕江.2006.退化和恢复中的植物群落.兰州大学博士毕业论文.
    30.马春辉,韩建国,李鸿祥等.1999.一年生混播草地生物量和品质以及种问竞争的动态研究.草地学报.7(1):62-71.
    31.马春辉,韩建国,李鸿祥,毛培胜,戎郁萍.1999.一年生混播草地生物量和品质以及种间竞争的动态研究.草地学报.7(1):62-71.
    32.马涛.2007.青藏高原高寒草甸植物群落结构和功能对施肥和刈割干扰的响应研究.兰州大学硕士毕业论文.
    33.牛克昌,赵志刚,罗燕江,杜国祯.2006.施肥对高寒草甸植物群落组分种繁殖分配的影响.
    34.张仁平.2007.绿洲区苜蓿与无芒雀麦混播草地种群特征和第一性生产力的研究.
    35.邱正强,马玉寿,施建军,董全民,王彦龙.2006.刈割对“黑土滩”人工草地植被的影响.青海大学学报(自然科学版).24(4):16-24.
    36.任继周.1995.草地农业生态学.中国农业出版社.
    37.沈益新,梁祖铎,王槐三,陈志飞,1992,种植密度、刈割高度和刈割频度对百脉根产草性能的影响.草业科学.9(3):37-40.
    38.孙铁军.2005.施肥对禾本科牧草种子产量形成及种子发育过程中生理生化特性的影响.中国农业大学草地研究所博士学位论文.
    39.王刚,蒋文兰.人工草地种群生态学研究.兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社,1998.
    40.王国宏.2000.河西山地、绿洲、荒漠植物群落种群多样性研究,博士学位论文.甘肃农业大学.
    41.王薇娟,1999.青海省优势害鼠的种类、分布及防治建议.青海草业1:50-52.
    42.王文,苗建勋,常生华等,2003,刈割对混播草地种群生长与产量关系及种间竞争特性的影响(J),草业学报,20(9):20-23.
    43.文亦蒂,蒋文兰,冉繁军.2001.改良云贵高原退化红壤人工草地的旋肥效应研究.草原与草坪,5(2):46-48.
    45.夏景新.1994.刈牧对禾草草地的再生和生产力影响的研究进展.草地学报.2(1):45-55.
    46.张永亮,胡自治,赵海新,王健丽.2004.刈割对混播当年生物量及再生速率的影响.草地学报.12(4):308-312.
    47.赵志刚,杜国祯,任青吉.2004.5种毛茛科植物个体大小依赖的繁殖分配和性分配.植物生态学报.28(1):1-16.
    48.周集中,马世骏,1990.生态系统的稳定性.现代生态学透视.北京:高等教育出版社.
    49.周青平,金继运,德科加,徐成体.2005.不同施氮水平对高寒草地牧草增产效益的研究.土壤肥料.3:29-31.
    50.周青平.2005.高寒地区一年生禾豆饲草混播群落内部组分及调控的研究.甘肃农业大学博士学位论文.
    51.周兴民等.2001.中国嵩草草甸.北京:科学出版社.
    52.祝廷成,钟章成,李建东编.1988.植物生态学.高等教育出版社.
    53.Aarssen L.W.&Turkington R 1985.Competitive re1ations among species from pastures of different ages.Canadian Journal of Botany.63:2319-2325.
    54.Aarssen L.W.& Keogh T.2002.Conundrums of competitive ability in plants:what to measure? Oikos,96(3):531-542.
    55.Amato A.W.D.& Puettmann K.J.(2004)The relative dominance hypothesis explains interaction dynamics in mixed species Alnus rubra/ Pseudotsuga menziesii stands.Journal of Ecology.,92:450-463.
    56.Austin M.P.,Fresco L.F.M.,Nicholls AO,et al.1988.Competition and relative yield:estimation and interpretation at different densities and under various nutrient concentrations using Silybum Marianum and Cirsium Vulgar.Journal of Ecology.6:57-71.
    57.Bazzaz F.A.1996.Plants in changing environment:Linking physiological,population,and community ecology.Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.
    58.Burke I.C,Schimet D.S.,Yonker C.M.,Parton W.J.,Joyce L.A.&Lauenroth W.K.1990.Regional modeling of grassland biogeochemistry using GIS.Landscape Ecology.4:45-54.
    59.Cannell M.G.R.,Rothery P.& Ford E.D.1984.Competition within stands of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta.Annals of Botany.53:349-362.
    60.Carle,C,R.K(o|¨)lliker,B.Reidy,A.L(u|¨)scher,and J.N(u|¨)sberger.2002.Effect of season and cutting frequency on root and shoot competition between Festuca pratensis and Dactylis glomerata.Grass and Forage Science.57:247-254.
    61.Clements F.E.1916.Plant succession:An analysis of community functions.Carnegie Institute,Washington.USA.
    62.Connolly J,Wayne P,Bazzaz FA.2001.Interspecific competition in plants:how well do current methods answer rundmental questions?The naturalist American naturalist.57(2):107-125.
    63.De Grandpre L.&Bergeron Y.,1997.Diversity and stability of understory communities following disturbance in the southern boreal forest.Journal of Ecology.85:77-84.
    64.De Steven D.1991.Experiments on mechanisms of tree establishment in old-field succession:seedling survival and growth.Ecology.72:1076-1088.
    65.De Wit,C.T.,1960.On competition.Versiagen van Landbouwk undige onderzoekingen,66:1-82.
    66.Dong,S.K.,M.Y.Kang,Z.Z.Hu,R.Long,and X.P.Pu.2004.Performance of cultivated perennial grass mixtures under different grazing intensities in the alpine region of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Grass and Forage Science 59:298-306.
    67.Firbank L.G &Watkinson A.R.1990.On the effects of competition:from monocultures to mixtures.Perspective on Plant competition(eds Grace,J.B &Tilman,D.),Acedemic Press,San Diego.USA.ppl65-192.
    68.Firbank LG and Watkinson A R.1990.On the effects of competition:from monocultures to mixtures.Perspective on Plant competition.USA,Academic Press,San Diego,165-192.
    69.Fowler.N.1982.Competition and coexistence in a North Carolina Grassland.Journal of Ecology.70.77-92.
    70.Freckleton R.P.& Watinson A.R.2001.Asymmetric competition between plant species.Functional Ecology.15:615-623.
    71.Fynn R.W.S.,C.D.Morris,and K.P.Kirkman.2005.Plant strategies and trade-offs influence trends in competitive ability along gradients of soil fertility and disturbance.Journal of ecology.1-10.
    72.Gaudet,C.L.,and P.A.Keddy.1995.Competitive performance and species distribution in shoreline plant communities:a comparative approach.Ecology.76:280-291.
    73.Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants.Journal of Ecolog,87,1-16.
    74.Gibson D.J.,Connolly J.,1990.Hartnett D.C.& Weidenhamer D.
    75.Gleason H.A.The individualistic concept of the plant association.Bulletin of the Torrey.Botanical Club.1926,44:463481.
    76.Goldberg D.E.& Barton A.M.1992.Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities:a review of field experiments with plants.American natural,39,771-801.
    77.Goldberg D.E.1996.Competitive ability:definitions,contingency and correlated traits.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London,351:377-385.
    78.Goldsmith F.B.1978.Interaction(competition)studies as a step towards the synthesis of seacliff vegetation.Journal of Ecology.66:921-931.
    79.Grime,J.P.1979.Plant Strategies and vegetation processes.Wiley,Chrichester,UK.
    80.Hamback P.A.and Beckerman A.P.2003.Herbivory and plant resource competition:a review of two interacting interactions.Oikos.101:26-37.
    81.Harper J.L.1977.Plant population Biology.Acedemic Press,San Diego,USA.
    82.Harper,1.L.1977.Population biology of plants.Academic Press,London,New York,Toronto,Sydney,San Francisco.
    83.Hartgerink A.P.& Bazzaz F.A.(1984)seedling-scale environmental heterogeneity influences individual fitness and population structure.Ecology,65:198-206.
    84.Howard T.G.& Goldberg D.E.2001.Competitive response hierarchies for germination,growth,and survival and their influence.Ecology,82(4):979-990.
    85.Joliffe PA.2000.The replacement series.Journal of Ecology,88:371-385.
    86.Keddy P.A.(1989)Competition.Chapman & Hall,London,UK.
    87.Keddy P.A.,Gaudet C.& Fraser L.H.2000.Effects of low and high nutrients on the competetive ierarchy of 26 shoreline plants.Journal of ecology,88,413-423.
    88.Keddy P.A.,Twolan-strutt L.& Shipley B.1997.Experimental evidence that interspecific competitive asymmetry increases with soil production.Oikos,80:253-256.
    89.Keddy,P.A.1990.Competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization in plant communities.In:J.B.Grace and D.Tilman.Perspectives on plant competition.California,USA:Academic Press,San Diego.p.265-290.
    90.Knapp A.K.&Fahnestock J.T.1993.Landscape patterns in soil-plant relations and primary production in tallgrass prairie.Ecology.74(2):549-560.
    91.Knee,M,and L.C.Thomas.2002.Light utilization and competition between Echinacea purpurea,Panicum virgatum and Ratibida pinnata under greenhouse and field conditions.Ecological Research.17:591-599.
    92.Li B.& Watkinson A.R.2000.Competition along nutrient gradient:a case study with Daucus carota and Chenopodium album.Ecological Research,15,293-306.Feed value of native forages of the Tibetan Plateau of China.Animal Feed Science Technology 80:101-113.
    93.Long,R.J.,S.O.Apori,F.B.Castro,and E.R.(?)rskov.1999b.
    94.MacArthur,RH.1972.Geographical Ecology,Harper&Row,New York.
    95.McGilchrist,C.A.,1965.Analysis of competition experiment,Biometrics.21:975-985.
    96.Peart D.R.(1989)Species interactions in a successional grassland.Ⅱ.Colonization of vegetated sites.Journal of Ecology.77,252-166.
    97.Reader R J.,Wilson S.D.&Belcher J.W.et al,1994.Plant competition in relation to neighbor biomass:An intercontinental study with poa pratensis.Ecology 75(6):1753-1760.
    98.Remison S.U.&Snaydon K W.1980.A companion of root competition and shoot competition between Dactylis glomerata and Holcus lanatus.Grass and Forage Science.35:183187.
    99.Remison S.U.&Snaydon R W.1990.Effects of defoliation and fertilizers on root competition between Dactylis glomerata and Lolium perenne.Grass and Forage Science.35:81-93.
    100.Ross M.A.& Harper J.L.1972.Occupation of biological source during粒ling establishment.Journal of Ecology,60:77-88.
    101.Schmitt J.,Ehrhardt D.& Cheo M.1987.Dominance and suppression,size-dependent growth and self-thinning in a natural Impatiens capensis population.Journal of Ecology,75:651-665.
    102.Schwinning,S.and J.Weiner.1998.Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants.Oecologia.113:447-455.
    103.Scott D.W.&Tileman D.1993.Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization.Ecology,74(2):599-611.
    104.Silvertown J.W.1982.Introduction to plant population ecology.Longman,New York,USA.132-163.
    105.Taylor D.R,Aarssen L.W.&Loehle C.1990.On the relationship between R/K selection and environmental carrying capacity:A new habitat templet for life history strategies,Oikos.58:239-250.
    106.Taylor D.R,& Aarssen.(1989)On the density dependence of replacement-series competition experiments.Journal of Ecology,77,975-988.
    107.Tilman,D.1982.Resource Competition and Community Structure.Princeton,New Jersey,USA:Princeton University Press.
    108.Tilman,D.1990b.Constraints and tradeoffs:toward a predictive theory of competition and succession.Oiks.58:3-15.
    109.Tilman,D.1988.Plant strategies and the Dynamics and structure of plant community.Princeton University Press,Princeton,N.J.
    110.Tilman,D.,1985.The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession.American Naturalist,125:827-852.
    111.Watkinson A.R.,Lonsdale W.M.& Firbank L.G.1983.A neighbourhood approach to self-thinning.Oecologia,56:381-384.
    112.Weigelt A.& Jolliffe P.(2003)Indices of plant competition.Journal of ecology,91:707-720.
    113.Willey R.W.& Rao M.R.1980.A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops.Experimental Agriculture,16:117-125.
    114.Willey,R W.1979.Inter-cropping its importance and research needs.Part Ⅰ.Competition and yield advantages.Field Crop Abstract.32:1-10.
    115.Williams E.D.,1984.Some effects of fertilizer and frequency of defoliation on the botanical composition and field of permanent grassland.Ecology.
    116.Wilson,S.D.and D.Tilman.2002.Quadratic variation in old-field species richness along gradients of disturbance and nitrogen.Ecology.83:492-504.
    117.Xue,B.X.Q.Zhao,and Y.S.Zhan.2005.Seasonal changes in weight and body composition of yak grazing on alpine meadow ssland in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau of China.American Animal Science 83:1908-1913.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700