饶阳凹陷中北部古近系储层研究
|
摘要
通过参考饶阳凹陷中北部古近系的大量文献与资料,可以看出该区地质结构复杂,前期对储层方面的研究只限于局部地区和层位,缺少全面、系统的研究。针对上述问题,本文对饶阳凹陷中北部古近系10个三级层序发育的储层进行了研究,以期为该区下一阶段的勘探与开发方案提供依据。
本文以沉积学、层序地层学以及油田开发地质学为理论基础和指导,充分利用地震资料、岩心资料、室内资料、测井资料及数字处理成果等分析研究区的构造背景,进行地层划分与对比,建立层序地层格架,进而以三级层序为单元进行沉积体系分析。在构造、沉积及层序地层研究的基础上,结合大量的普通岩石薄片、铸体薄片、扫描电镜及文字鉴定报告等,系统地研究了该区储层的岩石学及物性特征,总结出研究区储层砂岩的成分与结构成熟度均较低,储集物性较差,以低孔低渗、中孔低渗和中孔中渗储层为主。同时,分层段研究了储层的成因类型及其特征、钻遇砂岩累计厚度及含砂率,总结出Ek-Ed1等10个三级层序中钻遇砂岩厚度及含砂率规律。然后,对该区成岩作用类型、成岩阶段划分及成岩相类型进行了全面研究,总结出早成岩阶段B期及中成岩阶段A期分别对应Ed2-Ed3及Es1-Es3,为原生、次生孔隙发育阶段,储层较为发育,储集性能较好。最后,以储集性能、孔隙结构类型、砂岩百分含量、砂体成因类型及成岩相带为依据建立储层综合评价标准,分层段进行储层综合评价,并在储层评价的基础上,结合构造、沉积特征及试油试采资料进行有利区带预测,总结出Es3上、Es2、Es1、Ed3及Ed2为该区的5个重点层位。
After learning lots of reference and data, there is a conclution that the texture of the researching area is very complex, and the prophase study on reservoir is so limited to local area and formation that it lacks comprehensive and systematical research. So the paper studied the reservoir with 10 Paleogene three-order sequence in the North-central of Raoyang Sag to provide basis for further exploration and formulation of development scheme.
On the basis of sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy and geology of oilfield development, making full use of seismic date, core material indoor, well logging information and its digital process outcome and so on, the article analyzed the tectonic background of the study area, so as to divide and compare strata and establish the sequence stratigraphic framework, and then to analyze the sedimentary systems with units of the three-order sequence. Based on the research about tectonic, sedimentation and sequence stratigraphy and combined with large amounts of ordinary rock slices, casting slices, photos of microscope scanning electron and appraisal report ,the paper studied the lithologic and physical property characteristics systematically, and concluded that the maturity of composition and structure of reservoir sandstone of the researching area are low and the physical property is not so good mainly containing reservoir with low porosity and low permeability, reservoir of moderate porosity and low permeability and of moderate porosity and moderate permeability. Furthermore, the article studied the forming types of reservoir and its features, the gross thickness of sandstone and sand factor, and then summed up the rules of the gross thickness of sandstone and sand factor on 10 (Ek-Ed1)three-order sequences, and then discussed the types of diagenesis, division of diagenetic stages and diagenesis phases comprehensively to conclude that the early diagenetic stage B and middle diagenetic stage A which are primary and secondary porosity stage respectively are in correspondence with Ed2-Ed3 and Es1-Es3, and the reservoir grows well and its accumulating property is good. Ultimately, on the basis of reservoir property, pore structure types, sandstone amounts, genesis types of sand bodies and diagenesis phase spread and so on, the paper established the comprehensive evaluation standard of reservoir ,and evaluated reservoirs of different formations comprehensively, and then based on the reservoir evaluation predicted the beneficial zone with structure, sedimentation characteristics and oil production data , and finally summarized that Es3上,Es2,Es1,Ed3 and Ed2 are the key formations in the researching area.
本文以沉积学、层序地层学以及油田开发地质学为理论基础和指导,充分利用地震资料、岩心资料、室内资料、测井资料及数字处理成果等分析研究区的构造背景,进行地层划分与对比,建立层序地层格架,进而以三级层序为单元进行沉积体系分析。在构造、沉积及层序地层研究的基础上,结合大量的普通岩石薄片、铸体薄片、扫描电镜及文字鉴定报告等,系统地研究了该区储层的岩石学及物性特征,总结出研究区储层砂岩的成分与结构成熟度均较低,储集物性较差,以低孔低渗、中孔低渗和中孔中渗储层为主。同时,分层段研究了储层的成因类型及其特征、钻遇砂岩累计厚度及含砂率,总结出Ek-Ed1等10个三级层序中钻遇砂岩厚度及含砂率规律。然后,对该区成岩作用类型、成岩阶段划分及成岩相类型进行了全面研究,总结出早成岩阶段B期及中成岩阶段A期分别对应Ed2-Ed3及Es1-Es3,为原生、次生孔隙发育阶段,储层较为发育,储集性能较好。最后,以储集性能、孔隙结构类型、砂岩百分含量、砂体成因类型及成岩相带为依据建立储层综合评价标准,分层段进行储层综合评价,并在储层评价的基础上,结合构造、沉积特征及试油试采资料进行有利区带预测,总结出Es3上、Es2、Es1、Ed3及Ed2为该区的5个重点层位。
After learning lots of reference and data, there is a conclution that the texture of the researching area is very complex, and the prophase study on reservoir is so limited to local area and formation that it lacks comprehensive and systematical research. So the paper studied the reservoir with 10 Paleogene three-order sequence in the North-central of Raoyang Sag to provide basis for further exploration and formulation of development scheme.
On the basis of sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy and geology of oilfield development, making full use of seismic date, core material indoor, well logging information and its digital process outcome and so on, the article analyzed the tectonic background of the study area, so as to divide and compare strata and establish the sequence stratigraphic framework, and then to analyze the sedimentary systems with units of the three-order sequence. Based on the research about tectonic, sedimentation and sequence stratigraphy and combined with large amounts of ordinary rock slices, casting slices, photos of microscope scanning electron and appraisal report ,the paper studied the lithologic and physical property characteristics systematically, and concluded that the maturity of composition and structure of reservoir sandstone of the researching area are low and the physical property is not so good mainly containing reservoir with low porosity and low permeability, reservoir of moderate porosity and low permeability and of moderate porosity and moderate permeability. Furthermore, the article studied the forming types of reservoir and its features, the gross thickness of sandstone and sand factor, and then summed up the rules of the gross thickness of sandstone and sand factor on 10 (Ek-Ed1)three-order sequences, and then discussed the types of diagenesis, division of diagenetic stages and diagenesis phases comprehensively to conclude that the early diagenetic stage B and middle diagenetic stage A which are primary and secondary porosity stage respectively are in correspondence with Ed2-Ed3 and Es1-Es3, and the reservoir grows well and its accumulating property is good. Ultimately, on the basis of reservoir property, pore structure types, sandstone amounts, genesis types of sand bodies and diagenesis phase spread and so on, the paper established the comprehensive evaluation standard of reservoir ,and evaluated reservoirs of different formations comprehensively, and then based on the reservoir evaluation predicted the beneficial zone with structure, sedimentation characteristics and oil production data , and finally summarized that Es3上,Es2,Es1,Ed3 and Ed2 are the key formations in the researching area.
引文
[1]张锐锋.饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层学及隐蔽油气藏勘探研究[D],2005:1.
[2]杜金虎,邹伟宏.冀中坳陷油气分布规律与勘探方向[M],2000:524～597.
[3]王建东,刘吉余,于润涛等.层次分析法在储层评价中的应用[J].大庆石油学院学报,2003,27(3):12～14.
[4]邓万友.基于模糊综合评判法的双河油田储层评价[J].大庆石油学院学报,2008,32(1):18～20.
[5]孙洪志,刘吉余.储层综合定量评价方法研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(6):8～10.
[6]李国军.核磁共振测井在储层评价中的应用[J].内蒙古石油化工,2005,(1):91.
[7]封晓霞,吕勇.核磁共振储层评价技术应用[J].南方油气,2006,19(2～3):46～49.
[8] Watson A T, Chang C T P. Characterizing Porous Media with NMR Methods. Prog Nucl M ag Res Spec,1997,31:343～386.
[9]藏士宾,孙玺,袁海燕等.核磁共振技术在储层评价中的应用研究-以青海柴达木盆地为例[J].青海石油,2007,25(4):7～11.
[10]李娜,李新胜,许登才等.灰色系统理论在国外OLT油田储层精细评价中的应用[J].西北地质,2007,40(4):75～80.
[11]陈荣环,宋子齐,康立明等.灰色系统在新疆克拉玛依油田七中区储层评价中的应用[J].内蒙古石油化工,2005,(7):110～113.
[12]赵加凡,陈小宏,张勤等.灰关联分析在储层评价中的应用[J].勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(4):282～286.
[13]胡涛.潜江凹陷新沟嘴组砂体预测技术[J].江汉石油学院学报,2003, 25(1): 1～3.
[14]武军昌,吴胜和,高志勇等.东营凹陷坨71区块有利储集砂体预测研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(1):6～8.
[15]张年富,齐雪峰,王英民等.准噶尔盆地侏罗系Ⅲ层序底界上下砂体预测与有利评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):145～149.
[16]刘云武,吴海波,刘金平等.大庆长垣南部扶杨油层河道砂体预测方法与应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(5):106～108.
[17]胡水清,韩大匡,刘文岭等.应用谱分解技术预测河道砂体[J].新疆石油地质,2008,29(3):370～372.
[18]王宏亮.红柳油田河流相砂体储层预测技术[J].内江科技,2008,(4):109.
[19]周开明,刘贤红,查树贵等.几种时频分析技术的性能研究及在河道砂体预测中的应用[J].天然气工业,2007,27:451～453.
[20]关达,张秀荣.利用地震属性预测河道砂体[J].石油物探,2004,43(1):56～58.
[21]孙思敏,彭仕宓.地质统计学反演方法及其在薄层砂体预测中的应用[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(1):41～48.
[22] Haas A,Dubrule O.Geostatistical inversion 2A sequential method for stochastic reservoir modeling constrained by seis2 mic data[J]. First Break,1994,13(12):61～569.
[23] Dubrule O,Thibaut M,Lamy P,et al. Haas,Geostatistical reservoir aracterization constrained by 3d seismic data [J].Petroleum science,1998(4):121～128.
[24] Rothman D H. Geostatistical inversion of 32D seismic data for thin2sand delineation[J]. Geophysics , 1998 , 51 (2): 332～346.
[25]许辉群,桂志先.利用测井约束地震反演预测砂体展布[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2006,28(3):258～260.
[26]梁光河.测井约束地震子波外推方法研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,1998,33(3):296～304.
[27]朱夏.试论中国中新生代含油气盆地的地球动力学背景[A].朱夏:中国中新生代盆地构造和演化,北京:科学出版社,1983.1～10.
[28]张文朝,崔周旗,韩春元等.冀中坳陷老第三纪湖盆演化与油气[J].古地理学报,2001,3(1):45～49.
[29]纪友亮,杜金虎,赵贤正等.饶阳凹陷下第三系层序类型及发育模式[J].沉积学报,2007,25(1):1～9.
[30]李春光.渤海湾盆地的隐蔽油气勘探[J].复式油气田,2000,(2):1～5.
[31]金凤鸣,陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成与勘探-以冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷为例[D],2007: 65～71.
[32]纪友亮,张世奇等.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京:地质出版社, 1998:1～195.
[33]朱筱敏.层序地层学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2006:120.
[34] Keith W.Shanley and Peter J.Mcabe.1994,Perspective on the Sequence Stratigraphy ofContinental Strata,AAPG, 78(4),544～568.
[35] Yagishita K. Paleocurrent and fabric analysesbof fluvial conglomerates of the Paleogene Noda Group, Northeast Japain. Sedementary Geology,1997,109(1～2):53～71.
[36] Padmalal D,Ramachandran K K,Seralathan P.Significance of heavy mineral suite in riverine and estuarine sediments in the southwest coast of India:a case study. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences,1998, 27(2):185～189.
[37] DeGraaff K A,Ireland T R,McWilliams M 0. Empirical evaluation of detrital zircon systematics in fluvial and turbidite depositional systems. Geological Society of America, 1999 annual meeting, Abstracts with Program, 1999, 31:7.
[38] Dill H G.Areview of heavy minerals in clastic in sediments with case studies from the alluvial-fan through’the nearshore-marine environments.Earth Science Reviews,1998, 45(1～2):103～132.
[39]崔周旗.渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷古近系沉积体系与隐蔽油气藏勘探[D]. 2005,11～49.
[40]杜金虎,邹伟宏,费宝生等.冀中坳陷古潜山复式油气聚集区[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
[41]田崇鲁,李德同,刘铁铨.箕状凹陷演化模式及其研究方法探讨-以冀中坳陷早第三纪凹陷演化为例[D]. 1991,37(2): 107～116.
[42]苑保国.霸县凹陷鄚州地区古近系沙河街组沙一下～沙四段层序地层及沉积体系研究[D].2009,58～101.
[43]刘井旺.冀中中部石油地质综合研究及预探目标评价,2004.
[44]王余全.饶阳凹陷中南部沉积体系研究与预探目标优选,2003.
[45] Scholle,Peter,Sandstone Depositional Environment,AAPG,print.27,1982.
[46] Galloway,W.E.and D.K.Hobday,1996,Terrigenous Clastic Depositional Systems 219～225 (Springer Verlag Berlin).
[47]朱筱敏,钟大康,张琴等.济阳拗陷古近系碎屑岩储层特征和评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:243～251.
[48]陈春强.东营凹陷古近系层序格架内储层成岩作用研究[D].2006:119～125.
[49]冯娟萍.陕北姚店油田北区延长组沉积相及储层微观特征研究[D].2008:90～100.
[50]谢正温.陇东地区长6-8油层组沉积、储层特征及压裂地质研究[D].2004:54～56.
[51]李成博.松辽盆地南部情南-黑帝庙地区青山口组储层沉积学研究[D].2007:37～42.
[52]张世奇,纪友亮.油气田地下地质学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2006:124～130.
[53]陈桂菊.西地区上三叠统油气储层控制因素及评价研究[D],2007:58～70.
[54]李微.苏丹Palogue油层层序地层与储层分布预测[D],2006:88～98.
[55]操应长.成岩作用与储层评价[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2007:17～87.
[56]应凤祥,罗平,何东博等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:91～120.
[57]康健,吴应川,魏荷花等.文东深层低渗油藏成岩作用及成岩相模式研究[J].西南石油,2005,14(5):5～15.
[58]刘林玉,王震亮.白豹地区延长组长3储层的成岩作用与成岩相[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2008,38(1):99～102.
[59]周海燕,胡见义,郑俊章等.南图尔盖盆地储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2008,27(6):547～588.
[60]付国民,李鑫,梁志录等.油层砂岩成岩作用及其对储层性质的影响[J].西安科技大学学报,2007,27(3):377～381.
[61]李晓清,郭勤涛,丘东洲等.潍北油田储层的成岩作用及成岩相划分[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2001,21(4):28～33.
[62]王勇,鲍志东,张春雷等.西部凹陷北部沙河街组成岩作用及成岩相研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,30(5):64～68.
[63]高星,陈洪德,朱平等.苏里格气田西部盒8段储层成岩作用及其演化[J].天然气工业,2009,29(3):17～22.
[64]孙永传,李忠,李惠生等.中国东部含油气断陷盆地的成岩作用[M].北京:科学出版社,1996:22～25.
[65]徐志强,熊明.饶阳凹陷下第三系碎屑岩储集条件分析[J].沉积学报,1996,14 (2): 95～101.
[66]余家仁.冀中饶阳凹陷深部碎屑岩储层研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1992,10(1): 79～86.
[67]郑荣才,耿威,周刚等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6砂岩成岩作用与成岩相研究[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):1～8.
[68]田军.塔里木盆地库车坳陷白垩系-第三系沉积相及储层分布预测研究[D].2005:104～157.
[2]杜金虎,邹伟宏.冀中坳陷油气分布规律与勘探方向[M],2000:524～597.
[3]王建东,刘吉余,于润涛等.层次分析法在储层评价中的应用[J].大庆石油学院学报,2003,27(3):12～14.
[4]邓万友.基于模糊综合评判法的双河油田储层评价[J].大庆石油学院学报,2008,32(1):18～20.
[5]孙洪志,刘吉余.储层综合定量评价方法研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(6):8～10.
[6]李国军.核磁共振测井在储层评价中的应用[J].内蒙古石油化工,2005,(1):91.
[7]封晓霞,吕勇.核磁共振储层评价技术应用[J].南方油气,2006,19(2～3):46～49.
[8] Watson A T, Chang C T P. Characterizing Porous Media with NMR Methods. Prog Nucl M ag Res Spec,1997,31:343～386.
[9]藏士宾,孙玺,袁海燕等.核磁共振技术在储层评价中的应用研究-以青海柴达木盆地为例[J].青海石油,2007,25(4):7～11.
[10]李娜,李新胜,许登才等.灰色系统理论在国外OLT油田储层精细评价中的应用[J].西北地质,2007,40(4):75～80.
[11]陈荣环,宋子齐,康立明等.灰色系统在新疆克拉玛依油田七中区储层评价中的应用[J].内蒙古石油化工,2005,(7):110～113.
[12]赵加凡,陈小宏,张勤等.灰关联分析在储层评价中的应用[J].勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(4):282～286.
[13]胡涛.潜江凹陷新沟嘴组砂体预测技术[J].江汉石油学院学报,2003, 25(1): 1～3.
[14]武军昌,吴胜和,高志勇等.东营凹陷坨71区块有利储集砂体预测研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(1):6～8.
[15]张年富,齐雪峰,王英民等.准噶尔盆地侏罗系Ⅲ层序底界上下砂体预测与有利评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):145～149.
[16]刘云武,吴海波,刘金平等.大庆长垣南部扶杨油层河道砂体预测方法与应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(5):106～108.
[17]胡水清,韩大匡,刘文岭等.应用谱分解技术预测河道砂体[J].新疆石油地质,2008,29(3):370～372.
[18]王宏亮.红柳油田河流相砂体储层预测技术[J].内江科技,2008,(4):109.
[19]周开明,刘贤红,查树贵等.几种时频分析技术的性能研究及在河道砂体预测中的应用[J].天然气工业,2007,27:451～453.
[20]关达,张秀荣.利用地震属性预测河道砂体[J].石油物探,2004,43(1):56～58.
[21]孙思敏,彭仕宓.地质统计学反演方法及其在薄层砂体预测中的应用[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(1):41～48.
[22] Haas A,Dubrule O.Geostatistical inversion 2A sequential method for stochastic reservoir modeling constrained by seis2 mic data[J]. First Break,1994,13(12):61～569.
[23] Dubrule O,Thibaut M,Lamy P,et al. Haas,Geostatistical reservoir aracterization constrained by 3d seismic data [J].Petroleum science,1998(4):121～128.
[24] Rothman D H. Geostatistical inversion of 32D seismic data for thin2sand delineation[J]. Geophysics , 1998 , 51 (2): 332～346.
[25]许辉群,桂志先.利用测井约束地震反演预测砂体展布[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2006,28(3):258～260.
[26]梁光河.测井约束地震子波外推方法研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,1998,33(3):296～304.
[27]朱夏.试论中国中新生代含油气盆地的地球动力学背景[A].朱夏:中国中新生代盆地构造和演化,北京:科学出版社,1983.1～10.
[28]张文朝,崔周旗,韩春元等.冀中坳陷老第三纪湖盆演化与油气[J].古地理学报,2001,3(1):45～49.
[29]纪友亮,杜金虎,赵贤正等.饶阳凹陷下第三系层序类型及发育模式[J].沉积学报,2007,25(1):1～9.
[30]李春光.渤海湾盆地的隐蔽油气勘探[J].复式油气田,2000,(2):1～5.
[31]金凤鸣,陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成与勘探-以冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷为例[D],2007: 65～71.
[32]纪友亮,张世奇等.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京:地质出版社, 1998:1～195.
[33]朱筱敏.层序地层学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2006:120.
[34] Keith W.Shanley and Peter J.Mcabe.1994,Perspective on the Sequence Stratigraphy ofContinental Strata,AAPG, 78(4),544～568.
[35] Yagishita K. Paleocurrent and fabric analysesbof fluvial conglomerates of the Paleogene Noda Group, Northeast Japain. Sedementary Geology,1997,109(1～2):53～71.
[36] Padmalal D,Ramachandran K K,Seralathan P.Significance of heavy mineral suite in riverine and estuarine sediments in the southwest coast of India:a case study. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences,1998, 27(2):185～189.
[37] DeGraaff K A,Ireland T R,McWilliams M 0. Empirical evaluation of detrital zircon systematics in fluvial and turbidite depositional systems. Geological Society of America, 1999 annual meeting, Abstracts with Program, 1999, 31:7.
[38] Dill H G.Areview of heavy minerals in clastic in sediments with case studies from the alluvial-fan through’the nearshore-marine environments.Earth Science Reviews,1998, 45(1～2):103～132.
[39]崔周旗.渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷古近系沉积体系与隐蔽油气藏勘探[D]. 2005,11～49.
[40]杜金虎,邹伟宏,费宝生等.冀中坳陷古潜山复式油气聚集区[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
[41]田崇鲁,李德同,刘铁铨.箕状凹陷演化模式及其研究方法探讨-以冀中坳陷早第三纪凹陷演化为例[D]. 1991,37(2): 107～116.
[42]苑保国.霸县凹陷鄚州地区古近系沙河街组沙一下～沙四段层序地层及沉积体系研究[D].2009,58～101.
[43]刘井旺.冀中中部石油地质综合研究及预探目标评价,2004.
[44]王余全.饶阳凹陷中南部沉积体系研究与预探目标优选,2003.
[45] Scholle,Peter,Sandstone Depositional Environment,AAPG,print.27,1982.
[46] Galloway,W.E.and D.K.Hobday,1996,Terrigenous Clastic Depositional Systems 219～225 (Springer Verlag Berlin).
[47]朱筱敏,钟大康,张琴等.济阳拗陷古近系碎屑岩储层特征和评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:243～251.
[48]陈春强.东营凹陷古近系层序格架内储层成岩作用研究[D].2006:119～125.
[49]冯娟萍.陕北姚店油田北区延长组沉积相及储层微观特征研究[D].2008:90～100.
[50]谢正温.陇东地区长6-8油层组沉积、储层特征及压裂地质研究[D].2004:54～56.
[51]李成博.松辽盆地南部情南-黑帝庙地区青山口组储层沉积学研究[D].2007:37～42.
[52]张世奇,纪友亮.油气田地下地质学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2006:124～130.
[53]陈桂菊.西地区上三叠统油气储层控制因素及评价研究[D],2007:58～70.
[54]李微.苏丹Palogue油层层序地层与储层分布预测[D],2006:88～98.
[55]操应长.成岩作用与储层评价[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2007:17～87.
[56]应凤祥,罗平,何东博等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:91～120.
[57]康健,吴应川,魏荷花等.文东深层低渗油藏成岩作用及成岩相模式研究[J].西南石油,2005,14(5):5～15.
[58]刘林玉,王震亮.白豹地区延长组长3储层的成岩作用与成岩相[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2008,38(1):99～102.
[59]周海燕,胡见义,郑俊章等.南图尔盖盆地储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2008,27(6):547～588.
[60]付国民,李鑫,梁志录等.油层砂岩成岩作用及其对储层性质的影响[J].西安科技大学学报,2007,27(3):377～381.
[61]李晓清,郭勤涛,丘东洲等.潍北油田储层的成岩作用及成岩相划分[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2001,21(4):28～33.
[62]王勇,鲍志东,张春雷等.西部凹陷北部沙河街组成岩作用及成岩相研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,30(5):64～68.
[63]高星,陈洪德,朱平等.苏里格气田西部盒8段储层成岩作用及其演化[J].天然气工业,2009,29(3):17～22.
[64]孙永传,李忠,李惠生等.中国东部含油气断陷盆地的成岩作用[M].北京:科学出版社,1996:22～25.
[65]徐志强,熊明.饶阳凹陷下第三系碎屑岩储集条件分析[J].沉积学报,1996,14 (2): 95～101.
[66]余家仁.冀中饶阳凹陷深部碎屑岩储层研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1992,10(1): 79～86.
[67]郑荣才,耿威,周刚等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6砂岩成岩作用与成岩相研究[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):1～8.
[68]田军.塔里木盆地库车坳陷白垩系-第三系沉积相及储层分布预测研究[D].2005:104～157.