依—舒地堑汤原断陷构造演化及其对成藏的控制作用
|
摘要
本文以依-舒地堑汤原断陷为研究对象,应用地球动力学、构造运动学、沉积学、油藏地质学等理论,以地质、地球物理资料和钻井资料为基础,对依-舒地堑汤原断陷构造演化及其对成盆、成烃和成藏的控制作用进行了系统研究。
通过对依-舒地堑构造演化研究认为汤原断陷中生界盆地与新生界盆地为叠置关系,断裂在新生界时期表现为控盆断裂,断裂性质为张剪性,断陷属于被动性成盆机制所控制的被动型裂谷盆地。汤原断陷构造和沉积演化经历了中生界断陷期、新生代的强烈断陷期、持续断陷期、断凹转化期、断陷萎缩期、断陷消亡期六个阶段。断陷整体表现为东西分带、南北分块的构造格架。汤原断陷断裂发育主要有两个方向,即北东向和北西西向,其次发育近东西向和近南北向断层。北东向断裂控制着断陷的走向和次一级构造带的走向,与区域北东向构造走向一致;北西西向断层与北东向展布的主控断层呈依附和切割关系,使北东向展布的构造带呈现出南北分块的特点。断层主要发育有拉张/张扭、挤压/压扭、走滑断层三种类型,七种样式。边缘大断裂控制烃源岩的展布,主干断裂控制圈闭的形成和分布,断穿源岩和源岩附近的断裂为油气的运移提供了良好的通道条件,封闭的断裂为油气聚集成藏提供了有利的遮挡条件。
通过构造运动学研究得出断陷内Ⅳ块的基底伸展量最大,Ⅰ块其基底伸展率和伸展系数却是断陷内最大的,Ⅴ块的梧桐河向斜和军校屯构造是汤原断陷基底伸展量最小的地区。通过对15个块体的实例计算总结出不同构造、不同时期断块体的翘倾运动程度存在很大差异。走滑运动研究结果表明汤原断陷自宝泉岭组一段沉积以来,受太平洋板块由北西向俯冲转变为近东西向俯冲的影响,断陷内主要断层发生了右旋走滑运动,出现了近北东走向的滑移断层。
研究认为汤原断陷油气成藏模式主要为油气沿砂体侧向运移的地层超覆、断层遮挡、砂岩上倾尖灭、断块圈闭等成藏模式,其次为油气沿不整合面或砂体与断层组合长距离运移的古隆起之上各种类型圈闭成藏模式。汤原断陷发育有构造-岩性复合油气藏、岩性油气藏、构造油气藏、地层超覆及地层不整合遮挡等四种油气藏类型。
综合分析认为中央凸起带为最有利的勘探带,区块Ⅲ为最有利的勘探区块。主要油气勘探目的层应为宝泉岭组一段之下的深部地层。
The Tangyuan Fault Depression in Yi-Shu Graben is the object of this study.Based on the geology, seismic and drilling data, the structural evolution of TangyuanFault Depression and its impacts on basin formation, hydrocarbon formation and oilaccumulation are systemically studied by the study of geo-kinetics, tectonics,sedimentology, petroleum geology and other analysis.
The structural evolution of Tangyuan Fault Depression shows that: its Mesozoicbasin is overridden by its Cenozoic basin;the Cenozoic fault controlled the boundaryof the depression and the depression is a passive rift basin. The structural andsedimentary evolution experienced 6 phases: Mesozoic fault depression phase,Cenozoic strong fault depression phase, continuing fault depression phase,fault-depression transformation phase, fault depression suppression phase and faultdepression subduction phase. The faults developed mainly in NE and NNW, secondlyin approximately NS and approximately EW. The NE faults controlled thetrend of thedepression and the sub-depressions;the NWW faults dependented on and cut the NEfaults, dividing the NE structural trends into North and south blocks. 3 main types offault exists: tensional/ tensional-shear faults, compression/ compression-shear faultsand strike slip faults. The bounary major faults controlled the distribution of sourcerocks;major faults controlled the formation and distribution of traps;the faults whichdisrupted or near the source rocks provided good passage forpetroleum migration;sealed faults acted as the favorable shelter to petroleum accumulations.
The tectonic –kinetics study reveals that IV Block in the depressiopn has themaximal basement extension distance., while I Block has the maximal basementextension rate and factor, and the Wutonghe syncline and Jnjiaotun structure in VBlock have the minimal basement extension distance. Since the first member ofBaoquanling Group sedimented, the Pacific Plate diving direction changed from NWto approximately EW, causing the dextral strike slip faulting happened to the majorfaults in the depression, then some approximately NE slump faults appeared.
The petroleum geology study shows the main petroleum accumulation patternsare stratigraphic overlapping, fault screening, sandstone updip pinchout and faultblocking. The 4 main types of hydrocarbon reservoirs in the depression arestructural-lithologic reservoir, lithologic reservoir, structral reservoir, stratigraphicoverlap reservoir and stratigraphic unconformity screening reservoir.
Comprehensive analysis reveals that the central convex trends is most favorableexploration play, III Block is the most favorable exploration block.. The main zonesof interest are the deeper beds below the first member of Baoquanling Group.
通过对依-舒地堑构造演化研究认为汤原断陷中生界盆地与新生界盆地为叠置关系,断裂在新生界时期表现为控盆断裂,断裂性质为张剪性,断陷属于被动性成盆机制所控制的被动型裂谷盆地。汤原断陷构造和沉积演化经历了中生界断陷期、新生代的强烈断陷期、持续断陷期、断凹转化期、断陷萎缩期、断陷消亡期六个阶段。断陷整体表现为东西分带、南北分块的构造格架。汤原断陷断裂发育主要有两个方向,即北东向和北西西向,其次发育近东西向和近南北向断层。北东向断裂控制着断陷的走向和次一级构造带的走向,与区域北东向构造走向一致;北西西向断层与北东向展布的主控断层呈依附和切割关系,使北东向展布的构造带呈现出南北分块的特点。断层主要发育有拉张/张扭、挤压/压扭、走滑断层三种类型,七种样式。边缘大断裂控制烃源岩的展布,主干断裂控制圈闭的形成和分布,断穿源岩和源岩附近的断裂为油气的运移提供了良好的通道条件,封闭的断裂为油气聚集成藏提供了有利的遮挡条件。
通过构造运动学研究得出断陷内Ⅳ块的基底伸展量最大,Ⅰ块其基底伸展率和伸展系数却是断陷内最大的,Ⅴ块的梧桐河向斜和军校屯构造是汤原断陷基底伸展量最小的地区。通过对15个块体的实例计算总结出不同构造、不同时期断块体的翘倾运动程度存在很大差异。走滑运动研究结果表明汤原断陷自宝泉岭组一段沉积以来,受太平洋板块由北西向俯冲转变为近东西向俯冲的影响,断陷内主要断层发生了右旋走滑运动,出现了近北东走向的滑移断层。
研究认为汤原断陷油气成藏模式主要为油气沿砂体侧向运移的地层超覆、断层遮挡、砂岩上倾尖灭、断块圈闭等成藏模式,其次为油气沿不整合面或砂体与断层组合长距离运移的古隆起之上各种类型圈闭成藏模式。汤原断陷发育有构造-岩性复合油气藏、岩性油气藏、构造油气藏、地层超覆及地层不整合遮挡等四种油气藏类型。
综合分析认为中央凸起带为最有利的勘探带,区块Ⅲ为最有利的勘探区块。主要油气勘探目的层应为宝泉岭组一段之下的深部地层。
The Tangyuan Fault Depression in Yi-Shu Graben is the object of this study.Based on the geology, seismic and drilling data, the structural evolution of TangyuanFault Depression and its impacts on basin formation, hydrocarbon formation and oilaccumulation are systemically studied by the study of geo-kinetics, tectonics,sedimentology, petroleum geology and other analysis.
The structural evolution of Tangyuan Fault Depression shows that: its Mesozoicbasin is overridden by its Cenozoic basin;the Cenozoic fault controlled the boundaryof the depression and the depression is a passive rift basin. The structural andsedimentary evolution experienced 6 phases: Mesozoic fault depression phase,Cenozoic strong fault depression phase, continuing fault depression phase,fault-depression transformation phase, fault depression suppression phase and faultdepression subduction phase. The faults developed mainly in NE and NNW, secondlyin approximately NS and approximately EW. The NE faults controlled thetrend of thedepression and the sub-depressions;the NWW faults dependented on and cut the NEfaults, dividing the NE structural trends into North and south blocks. 3 main types offault exists: tensional/ tensional-shear faults, compression/ compression-shear faultsand strike slip faults. The bounary major faults controlled the distribution of sourcerocks;major faults controlled the formation and distribution of traps;the faults whichdisrupted or near the source rocks provided good passage forpetroleum migration;sealed faults acted as the favorable shelter to petroleum accumulations.
The tectonic –kinetics study reveals that IV Block in the depressiopn has themaximal basement extension distance., while I Block has the maximal basementextension rate and factor, and the Wutonghe syncline and Jnjiaotun structure in VBlock have the minimal basement extension distance. Since the first member ofBaoquanling Group sedimented, the Pacific Plate diving direction changed from NWto approximately EW, causing the dextral strike slip faulting happened to the majorfaults in the depression, then some approximately NE slump faults appeared.
The petroleum geology study shows the main petroleum accumulation patternsare stratigraphic overlapping, fault screening, sandstone updip pinchout and faultblocking. The 4 main types of hydrocarbon reservoirs in the depression arestructural-lithologic reservoir, lithologic reservoir, structral reservoir, stratigraphicoverlap reservoir and stratigraphic unconformity screening reservoir.
Comprehensive analysis reveals that the central convex trends is most favorableexploration play, III Block is the most favorable exploration block.. The main zonesof interest are the deeper beds below the first member of Baoquanling Group.
引文
[1] 薛良清.层序地层分析在裂谷盆地油气勘探中的应用.石油学报 2000,(21)7～11
[2] 蔡希源,李思田,等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学.北京:地质出版社,2003,3～4
[3] 李丕龙,等.陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探.北京:石油工业出版社,2003,7～11
[4] 樊太亮,等.层序地层应用于陆相油藏预测的成功实例[J].石油学报,1999,20(2):12～17
[5] 赵锡文.古地理学概论[M] .北京:地质出版社,1992
[6] 刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏,等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用.北京:石油工业出版社,2002,45～47
[7] 许浚远.依-舒地堑新生代构造演化.地球科学—中国地质大学学报 1997,(4) 406～409
[8] 许浚远,李惠芳,王艳萍,等.汤原断陷早第三纪中期基底顶面的三维古构造重建. 吉林地质 1997, 1(16)63～69
[9] 王永春.伊通地堑含油气系统与油气成藏.北京:石油工业出版社,2003,10～11
[10] 王孔伟,陈守田,刘立刚,等.黑龙江省东部第三系盆地传递断层带特征及其石油地质意义,大庆石油地质与开发 1998,4(17)1～3
[11] 白新华,罗群,等.汤原断陷中生界地层及含油气远景预测.大庆石油地质与开发, 1997,4(16)30～32
[12] 郭巍,朱建伟,等.断陷湖盆层序地层格架中的油气聚集规律.吉林大学学报,3(32):233～237
[13] 解习农.陆相盆地幕式构造旋回与层序构成.地球科学,1998,23(1):27～33
[14] 张强等.走滑环境中陆相盆地充填层序特征——以云南先锋盆地为例.沉积学报,1997,15(4):11～22
[15] 纪友亮.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学.北京:石油工业出版社,1996,22～43
[16] 杨玉峰,王孔伟,王始波,等.汤原断陷下第三系构造活动对层序的控制作用.石油与天然气地质,1999,1(20):50～53
[17] 周海燕,庞雄奇,等.应用排烃门限理论评价汤原断陷泥质烃源岩.石油勘探与开发 2000,1(27):25～28
[18] 黄第藩.煤成油地球化学新进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992
[19] 黄第藩.煤成油的形成和成烃机理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995
[20] 冯子辉,汪振英,等.汤原断陷煤成油地球化学特征.大庆石油地质与开发 2000,6(19):1～3
[21] 张晓东. 中国东北地区 CO2气藏成因及聚集规律分析.石油学报 2003,6(24):13～17
[22] 张晓东.依兰—伊通地堑构造演化特征与油气.黑龙江省石油学会, 2003 年学术年会论文
[23] 罗群等,复杂地区地震资料解释技术及其在汤原断陷的应用.石油实验地质,1998,1(20):27～33
[24] 王成金,刘士平,等.依通-舒兰断裂带的演化过程及其邻近地区地震危险区的模拟.长春地质学院学报,1987,1(17):21～28
[25] 刘家麒.论东北大裂谷系的形成和演化.地质科学,1989,(3):209～215
[26] 刘茂强,伊通-舒兰地堑地质构造特征及其演化.北京地质出版社,1993,1～200
[27] 吴河勇,刘文龙,等.外围盆地评价优选.大庆石油地质与开发,2004,5(23):20～22
[28] 梁春秀,魏志平,李本才,等.依兰-伊通盆地输导体系与油气运聚.天然气工业,2002,1(22):31～32
[29] 朱建伟,刘招君,等.吉林省伊通地堑莫里青断陷水下扇沉积特征.古地理学报,2002,3(4): 67～72
[30] 罗群,白新华,等.汤原断陷断裂构造特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用.长春科技大学学报,1999,3(29):247～251
[31] 罗群.汤原断陷断裂特征与油气成藏关系.新疆石油地质,1999,2(20):90～95
[32] 牛克智.依兰—依舒地堑地质特征及含油气远景.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1983,(11):25～66
[33] 苏景龙,李斌,贾琪,等.依—舒地堑汤原断陷北部石油地质特征研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1992,(20):361～375
[34] 苏景龙,李斌,贾琪,等.汤原断陷吉祥屯—龙王庙地区构造圈闭特征及含油气性研究.石油地质 研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1993,(21):135～144
[35] 王孔伟,苏景龙,文武,等.地堑汤原断陷构造特征与油气关系研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆 石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1994,(22):226～240
[36] 王平在,文武,王青海,等.汤原断陷烃源岩生烃潜力研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理 局勘探开发研究院 (内部材料)1995,(23):226～236
[37] 王始波,张吉光,张立国,等. 汤原断陷构造圈闭优选与油气藏类型分析.石油地质研究报告集, 大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1996,(24):67～73
[38] 孙德君,杨玉峰,苏景龙,等.汤原断陷沉积相及储层特征研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1997,(25):160～166
[39] 谢春林,郭学斌,彭威,等.汤原断陷吉祥屯、互助村构造气藏描述.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1997,(25):167～171
[40] 徐怀大译.威尔格斯 C K.层序地层学原理.北京:石油工业出版社,1993,49～85
[41] 陈全茂,李忠飞.辽河盆地东部凹陷构造及其含油气性分析 北京:地质出版社,1998,30～54
[42] 陈发景、陈全茂等.1988,板块与含油气盆地,中国地质大学出版社。
[43] 伊恩.勒奇著,蔡希源等译.盆地分析的定量方法(第二卷) 北京:石油工业出版社,2001,175～178
[44] 钟建华,李自安,张琴华等.剪切作用及剪切构造与生、储油[J ] .石油勘探与开发,1996,(2)21～23
[45] Jean du Rouchet . Stress field , a key to oil migration[J ]1AAPG Bulletin , 1981 ,65 (1) :174 ～ 851
[46] 童亨茂,地应力对排烃的影响方式及作用模型[J ]石油实验地质,2000,22(3):201～205
[47] 童亨茂 应力对流体压力、油气运移作用的几种模式[J ] 石油大学学报,1999 ,23 (2) 1
[48] 童亨茂 伸展盆地复杂断层组合成因新模式[A] 北京大学国际地质科学学术研讨会论文集[ C ] 北京: 地震出版社, 1998,1107～1111
[49] 马寅生,地应力在油气地质研究中的作用、意义和研究现状[J ]地质力学学报,1997,3(2):41～45
[50] Stockmal G S,Beaumont C and Boutelier R, Geodynamic models of convergent margin tectonics;the transition from rifted margin to overth rust belt and the consequences fo r fo rland basin development. AAPG Bull, 1986, 70: 180～190
[51] 孙 樯,谢鸿森,郭 捷,等.构造应力与油气藏生成及分布[J ]石油与天然气地质,2000,21(2):99～103
[52] 刘文汇.值得重视的有机质演化营力——成烃的力化学作用[J ] .天然气地球科学,1995,6(4):1～7
[53] Wilgus C K,Posamentier H W,Hastings B S,etal. 徐怀大等译,层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析)[M] .北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[54] ProsserS.Rift_related linked depositional systems and their seismic expression[A].In:Williams G D and Dobb A,eds.,Tectionics and seismic sequence stratigraphy[C].London:The Geological Society Pubishing House,1993,Geological Society Society Special Publication 71:35～66
[55] Posamentier H W,Vail P R.Eustatic controls on clastic deposition2-sequence and systems tract models[A].Wilgus C K,eds.Sea-level Changes:an Integrated Approach[C].SEPM Special Publication,1988(42):125～154
[56] Armentrout J M.Sequence Stratigraphy as an Exploration Tool:Concepts and Practices in the Gulf Coast[R].adam,s Mark Hotel,Houston,Texas,June2-5,1991.379～388
[57] W ilgus C K,etal.Sea_ level changes:an integrated approach[C].SEPM Special Pubication 42,1988
[58] Gallow W E.Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysis I:architecture and genesis of flooding_ surface bounded depositional units[j].AAPG Bulletin,1989,(2):125～142
[59] Vail P R,Audemard F,Bomman S A,et al.The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics,eustasy and sedimentology ---overview[A].In: Einsele G,Ricken W,Seilacher A,eds.Cycles and events stratigraphy[C].Springer -Verlag Beelin Heidelberg,1991.617～659
[60] Sloss L L.Forty years of sequence stratigraphy[J].Geol Soc Am Bull,1988,100:1 66～1 665
[61] Sloss L L .构造 – 层序地层学的主要控制因素:一种独立的观点[J] 刘树臣译。地质科学动态,1992,9(6)
[62] Wang H Z,Shi X Y.Ascheme of the Hierarchy for sequence stratigraphy[J].of China Uni Geosci,1996, (1) 7:1～12
[63] Steiner J.The sequence of geological events and the dynamics of the Milhy Way galady:the present cosmic year,a preliminary study[J].Journal of the Geological Society of Australia.1967,14(1):99～131
[64] Fernandez J,Bluck B Jetal.The effects of fluctuating base level on the structure of alluvial fan and associated fan delta depodits:an example from the Tertiary of the Betic Cordillera,Spain.Sedimentology,1993,(40)
[65] Shanley K W,Mc Cabe P J.Perspectives on the sequence strstigraphic of continental strata,AAPG Bull,1994,(78)
[66] Wheeler H E.Base level ,lithosphere surface and time-stratigraphy[J].Bull Geol Soc,1964,16(2):89～97
[67] Galloway W E.Siliciclastic slope and base-of-slope depositional systems:component facies,stratigraphic architecture,and classification[J].AAPG Bulletin,1998,82(4):569～595
[68] Van Wagoner J C,etal.Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs,cores,and outcrops[J].AAPG Methods in Exploration Series,1991,No.7
[69] Goldhammer P K,Lehmann P J ,Dunn P A.The Origin of high – frenquency platform carbonate cycles and third – order sequences (Lower Ordovician EL Pso GP,West Texas):constraints from outcrop data and stratigraphic modeling[J].Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1993,63(3):318～359
[70] Cloetingh S.Intraplate stresses: a new tectonic mechanism for fluctuation of relative sea – level[J].Geology,1986,14:617～621
[71] Posamentier H W,Vail P R.Eustatic controls on clastic deposition I – conceptual framework[A].In:Wilgus C K.et al,eds.Sea – level changes:an integrated approach[C].SEPM Spe Pub,1988,(42):109～124
[72] Jervey M T.Quantitative geological modeling of siliciclastic rock sequences and their seismic expressions[A].In Wilgus C K ,et al ,eds. Sea – level changes:an integrated approach[C].SEPM Spe Pub,1988,(42):47～69
[73] Embry A F .Mesozoic history of the Arctic Island[A].In: Trettin H P,ed.Geology of the innuitian orogen and Arctic platform of Canada and Greenland[C].Geological Survey of Canada , Geology of Canada ,1991,3:13
[74] Trexler J H ,Nitchman S P .Sequences stratigraphy and evolution of the Antler foreland basin ,east – central Nevada[J].Geology,1990,18:422～425
[75] Sarg J F .Carbonate sequence stratigraphy[A].In:Wilgus C K.et al,eds.Sea – level changes – an integrated approach[C].SEPM Spe Pub ,1988,(42):155～181.
[76] Schlager W .Depositional bias and environmental change – important factors in sequence stratigaphy[J].Sedimentary Geology ,1990,70:109～130 .
[77] Haq B V ,Hardenbol J ,Vail P R .Mesozoic Cenozoic chronostratigaphy and eustatic cycles[A] .In:Wilgus C K ,et al ,eds .Sea – level change:antegrated approach[C].SEPM Spe Pub ,1988,(42):71～108 .
[78] Mail A D .Stratigraphic sequences and their chronostratigraphyic correlation[J].Journal of Sedimentary Petrology ,1991 ,61(4):497～505 .
[79] TasimiY,OtofujiY,Mastuda T,etal.Opening of Japan Sea by asthenospheric injection.Tectonophysics 1989,166:317～329
[80] Lallem and S,Jolivet L.Japan Sea:a pull part basin Earth and Planetery Science Letters,1986,76:375～389
[81] Kimura G,TamakiK.Collision,rotation,and back-arc-spreading in the region of Okhotsk and Japan Sea.Tectonics,1986,(3):389～401
[82] Kimura G,Yakahashi M,Kono M.Mesozoic collision-extrusion tectonics in eastern China.Tectonophysics,1990,181(1-4):15～24
[83] Jolivet L.America-Eurasia plate boundary in eastern Asia and the opening of marginal basins.Earth and planetary Science Letters,1987,81(2/3):258～282
[84] Jolivet L,Huchon P,Rangin C.Tectonic setting of Western Pacific marginal basins.Tectonophsics,1989,160(1/4):23～47
[85] SNOWDON L R,POWELL T G.Immature oil and condensate-modification of hydrocarabon generation model from terrestrial organic matter[J].AAPG,1982,(66):775～788.
[2] 蔡希源,李思田,等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学.北京:地质出版社,2003,3～4
[3] 李丕龙,等.陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探.北京:石油工业出版社,2003,7～11
[4] 樊太亮,等.层序地层应用于陆相油藏预测的成功实例[J].石油学报,1999,20(2):12～17
[5] 赵锡文.古地理学概论[M] .北京:地质出版社,1992
[6] 刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏,等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用.北京:石油工业出版社,2002,45～47
[7] 许浚远.依-舒地堑新生代构造演化.地球科学—中国地质大学学报 1997,(4) 406～409
[8] 许浚远,李惠芳,王艳萍,等.汤原断陷早第三纪中期基底顶面的三维古构造重建. 吉林地质 1997, 1(16)63～69
[9] 王永春.伊通地堑含油气系统与油气成藏.北京:石油工业出版社,2003,10～11
[10] 王孔伟,陈守田,刘立刚,等.黑龙江省东部第三系盆地传递断层带特征及其石油地质意义,大庆石油地质与开发 1998,4(17)1～3
[11] 白新华,罗群,等.汤原断陷中生界地层及含油气远景预测.大庆石油地质与开发, 1997,4(16)30～32
[12] 郭巍,朱建伟,等.断陷湖盆层序地层格架中的油气聚集规律.吉林大学学报,3(32):233～237
[13] 解习农.陆相盆地幕式构造旋回与层序构成.地球科学,1998,23(1):27～33
[14] 张强等.走滑环境中陆相盆地充填层序特征——以云南先锋盆地为例.沉积学报,1997,15(4):11～22
[15] 纪友亮.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学.北京:石油工业出版社,1996,22～43
[16] 杨玉峰,王孔伟,王始波,等.汤原断陷下第三系构造活动对层序的控制作用.石油与天然气地质,1999,1(20):50～53
[17] 周海燕,庞雄奇,等.应用排烃门限理论评价汤原断陷泥质烃源岩.石油勘探与开发 2000,1(27):25～28
[18] 黄第藩.煤成油地球化学新进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992
[19] 黄第藩.煤成油的形成和成烃机理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995
[20] 冯子辉,汪振英,等.汤原断陷煤成油地球化学特征.大庆石油地质与开发 2000,6(19):1～3
[21] 张晓东. 中国东北地区 CO2气藏成因及聚集规律分析.石油学报 2003,6(24):13～17
[22] 张晓东.依兰—伊通地堑构造演化特征与油气.黑龙江省石油学会, 2003 年学术年会论文
[23] 罗群等,复杂地区地震资料解释技术及其在汤原断陷的应用.石油实验地质,1998,1(20):27～33
[24] 王成金,刘士平,等.依通-舒兰断裂带的演化过程及其邻近地区地震危险区的模拟.长春地质学院学报,1987,1(17):21～28
[25] 刘家麒.论东北大裂谷系的形成和演化.地质科学,1989,(3):209～215
[26] 刘茂强,伊通-舒兰地堑地质构造特征及其演化.北京地质出版社,1993,1～200
[27] 吴河勇,刘文龙,等.外围盆地评价优选.大庆石油地质与开发,2004,5(23):20～22
[28] 梁春秀,魏志平,李本才,等.依兰-伊通盆地输导体系与油气运聚.天然气工业,2002,1(22):31～32
[29] 朱建伟,刘招君,等.吉林省伊通地堑莫里青断陷水下扇沉积特征.古地理学报,2002,3(4): 67～72
[30] 罗群,白新华,等.汤原断陷断裂构造特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用.长春科技大学学报,1999,3(29):247～251
[31] 罗群.汤原断陷断裂特征与油气成藏关系.新疆石油地质,1999,2(20):90～95
[32] 牛克智.依兰—依舒地堑地质特征及含油气远景.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1983,(11):25～66
[33] 苏景龙,李斌,贾琪,等.依—舒地堑汤原断陷北部石油地质特征研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1992,(20):361～375
[34] 苏景龙,李斌,贾琪,等.汤原断陷吉祥屯—龙王庙地区构造圈闭特征及含油气性研究.石油地质 研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1993,(21):135～144
[35] 王孔伟,苏景龙,文武,等.地堑汤原断陷构造特征与油气关系研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆 石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1994,(22):226～240
[36] 王平在,文武,王青海,等.汤原断陷烃源岩生烃潜力研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理 局勘探开发研究院 (内部材料)1995,(23):226～236
[37] 王始波,张吉光,张立国,等. 汤原断陷构造圈闭优选与油气藏类型分析.石油地质研究报告集, 大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1996,(24):67～73
[38] 孙德君,杨玉峰,苏景龙,等.汤原断陷沉积相及储层特征研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1997,(25):160～166
[39] 谢春林,郭学斌,彭威,等.汤原断陷吉祥屯、互助村构造气藏描述.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料) 1997,(25):167～171
[40] 徐怀大译.威尔格斯 C K.层序地层学原理.北京:石油工业出版社,1993,49～85
[41] 陈全茂,李忠飞.辽河盆地东部凹陷构造及其含油气性分析 北京:地质出版社,1998,30～54
[42] 陈发景、陈全茂等.1988,板块与含油气盆地,中国地质大学出版社。
[43] 伊恩.勒奇著,蔡希源等译.盆地分析的定量方法(第二卷) 北京:石油工业出版社,2001,175～178
[44] 钟建华,李自安,张琴华等.剪切作用及剪切构造与生、储油[J ] .石油勘探与开发,1996,(2)21～23
[45] Jean du Rouchet . Stress field , a key to oil migration[J ]1AAPG Bulletin , 1981 ,65 (1) :174 ～ 851
[46] 童亨茂,地应力对排烃的影响方式及作用模型[J ]石油实验地质,2000,22(3):201～205
[47] 童亨茂 应力对流体压力、油气运移作用的几种模式[J ] 石油大学学报,1999 ,23 (2) 1
[48] 童亨茂 伸展盆地复杂断层组合成因新模式[A] 北京大学国际地质科学学术研讨会论文集[ C ] 北京: 地震出版社, 1998,1107～1111
[49] 马寅生,地应力在油气地质研究中的作用、意义和研究现状[J ]地质力学学报,1997,3(2):41～45
[50] Stockmal G S,Beaumont C and Boutelier R, Geodynamic models of convergent margin tectonics;the transition from rifted margin to overth rust belt and the consequences fo r fo rland basin development. AAPG Bull, 1986, 70: 180～190
[51] 孙 樯,谢鸿森,郭 捷,等.构造应力与油气藏生成及分布[J ]石油与天然气地质,2000,21(2):99～103
[52] 刘文汇.值得重视的有机质演化营力——成烃的力化学作用[J ] .天然气地球科学,1995,6(4):1～7
[53] Wilgus C K,Posamentier H W,Hastings B S,etal. 徐怀大等译,层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析)[M] .北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[54] ProsserS.Rift_related linked depositional systems and their seismic expression[A].In:Williams G D and Dobb A,eds.,Tectionics and seismic sequence stratigraphy[C].London:The Geological Society Pubishing House,1993,Geological Society Society Special Publication 71:35～66
[55] Posamentier H W,Vail P R.Eustatic controls on clastic deposition2-sequence and systems tract models[A].Wilgus C K,eds.Sea-level Changes:an Integrated Approach[C].SEPM Special Publication,1988(42):125～154
[56] Armentrout J M.Sequence Stratigraphy as an Exploration Tool:Concepts and Practices in the Gulf Coast[R].adam,s Mark Hotel,Houston,Texas,June2-5,1991.379～388
[57] W ilgus C K,etal.Sea_ level changes:an integrated approach[C].SEPM Special Pubication 42,1988
[58] Gallow W E.Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysis I:architecture and genesis of flooding_ surface bounded depositional units[j].AAPG Bulletin,1989,(2):125～142
[59] Vail P R,Audemard F,Bomman S A,et al.The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics,eustasy and sedimentology ---overview[A].In: Einsele G,Ricken W,Seilacher A,eds.Cycles and events stratigraphy[C].Springer -Verlag Beelin Heidelberg,1991.617～659
[60] Sloss L L.Forty years of sequence stratigraphy[J].Geol Soc Am Bull,1988,100:1 66～1 665
[61] Sloss L L .构造 – 层序地层学的主要控制因素:一种独立的观点[J] 刘树臣译。地质科学动态,1992,9(6)
[62] Wang H Z,Shi X Y.Ascheme of the Hierarchy for sequence stratigraphy[J].of China Uni Geosci,1996, (1) 7:1～12
[63] Steiner J.The sequence of geological events and the dynamics of the Milhy Way galady:the present cosmic year,a preliminary study[J].Journal of the Geological Society of Australia.1967,14(1):99～131
[64] Fernandez J,Bluck B Jetal.The effects of fluctuating base level on the structure of alluvial fan and associated fan delta depodits:an example from the Tertiary of the Betic Cordillera,Spain.Sedimentology,1993,(40)
[65] Shanley K W,Mc Cabe P J.Perspectives on the sequence strstigraphic of continental strata,AAPG Bull,1994,(78)
[66] Wheeler H E.Base level ,lithosphere surface and time-stratigraphy[J].Bull Geol Soc,1964,16(2):89～97
[67] Galloway W E.Siliciclastic slope and base-of-slope depositional systems:component facies,stratigraphic architecture,and classification[J].AAPG Bulletin,1998,82(4):569～595
[68] Van Wagoner J C,etal.Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs,cores,and outcrops[J].AAPG Methods in Exploration Series,1991,No.7
[69] Goldhammer P K,Lehmann P J ,Dunn P A.The Origin of high – frenquency platform carbonate cycles and third – order sequences (Lower Ordovician EL Pso GP,West Texas):constraints from outcrop data and stratigraphic modeling[J].Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1993,63(3):318～359
[70] Cloetingh S.Intraplate stresses: a new tectonic mechanism for fluctuation of relative sea – level[J].Geology,1986,14:617～621
[71] Posamentier H W,Vail P R.Eustatic controls on clastic deposition I – conceptual framework[A].In:Wilgus C K.et al,eds.Sea – level changes:an integrated approach[C].SEPM Spe Pub,1988,(42):109～124
[72] Jervey M T.Quantitative geological modeling of siliciclastic rock sequences and their seismic expressions[A].In Wilgus C K ,et al ,eds. Sea – level changes:an integrated approach[C].SEPM Spe Pub,1988,(42):47～69
[73] Embry A F .Mesozoic history of the Arctic Island[A].In: Trettin H P,ed.Geology of the innuitian orogen and Arctic platform of Canada and Greenland[C].Geological Survey of Canada , Geology of Canada ,1991,3:13
[74] Trexler J H ,Nitchman S P .Sequences stratigraphy and evolution of the Antler foreland basin ,east – central Nevada[J].Geology,1990,18:422～425
[75] Sarg J F .Carbonate sequence stratigraphy[A].In:Wilgus C K.et al,eds.Sea – level changes – an integrated approach[C].SEPM Spe Pub ,1988,(42):155～181.
[76] Schlager W .Depositional bias and environmental change – important factors in sequence stratigaphy[J].Sedimentary Geology ,1990,70:109～130 .
[77] Haq B V ,Hardenbol J ,Vail P R .Mesozoic Cenozoic chronostratigaphy and eustatic cycles[A] .In:Wilgus C K ,et al ,eds .Sea – level change:antegrated approach[C].SEPM Spe Pub ,1988,(42):71～108 .
[78] Mail A D .Stratigraphic sequences and their chronostratigraphyic correlation[J].Journal of Sedimentary Petrology ,1991 ,61(4):497～505 .
[79] TasimiY,OtofujiY,Mastuda T,etal.Opening of Japan Sea by asthenospheric injection.Tectonophysics 1989,166:317～329
[80] Lallem and S,Jolivet L.Japan Sea:a pull part basin Earth and Planetery Science Letters,1986,76:375～389
[81] Kimura G,TamakiK.Collision,rotation,and back-arc-spreading in the region of Okhotsk and Japan Sea.Tectonics,1986,(3):389～401
[82] Kimura G,Yakahashi M,Kono M.Mesozoic collision-extrusion tectonics in eastern China.Tectonophysics,1990,181(1-4):15～24
[83] Jolivet L.America-Eurasia plate boundary in eastern Asia and the opening of marginal basins.Earth and planetary Science Letters,1987,81(2/3):258～282
[84] Jolivet L,Huchon P,Rangin C.Tectonic setting of Western Pacific marginal basins.Tectonophsics,1989,160(1/4):23～47
[85] SNOWDON L R,POWELL T G.Immature oil and condensate-modification of hydrocarabon generation model from terrestrial organic matter[J].AAPG,1982,(66):775～788.