用户名: 密码: 验证码:
光电子产业创新网络的构建与演进研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
为了实现中国经济崛起的目标,必须改变我国高技术产业整体竞争力偏低的状况。光电子产业是新兴的高新技术产业部门,具有技术水平高、对国家核心竞争力提升贡献大的特点。由于光电子产业发展的“门槛”条件相对较高,因而其在全球范围内的分布呈现出非均衡格局。因此,分析德国等发达国家光电子企业创新网络特征和演变规律,对于促进我国高新技术产业的健康发展、丰富我国经济地理学研究内容均具有十分重要的意义。笔者在德国国家研究基金(DFG)项目“新兴经济体的知识吸收和国际竞争力研究——以中国光电子产业为例”(62201094)、中国国家自然科学基金项目“社会文化环境差异对上海地区中德企业网络构建的影响”(40371033)、国家留学基金项目“中德激光产业集群与创新网络研究”(2007u321 11)的支持下,通过广泛搜集文献资料,并在中德两地开展实地调研,对德国以及我国上海市光电子产业创新网络的形成、发展演化进行了较为系统的研究。
     国内外相关文献表明,很多学者多从对区域和企业的视角来研究创新网络问题。对于网络联系内容、网络结构和网络演化的研究,仍然主要集中于抽象的概括和简单的推理。然而,令人高兴的是,部分学者已经借助实证分析的方法,将研究的重点逐渐从抽象概念的简单描述向创新网络的具体功能和机理分析转移,社会网络定量分析方法和情景模拟也获得了更多的关注。
     论文在系统评述国内外技术创新体系、创新网络、产业集群研究成果的基础上,构建了光电子产业创新网络分析的理论框架。笔者沿着网络节点、链接、资源,网络构建条件、结构特征和演化的思路,系统地论述了光电子产业的特点和类别,回顾了德国四个重点地区光电子产业网络的形成、发展与演化过程,并将其与中国以及上海的光电子产业创新网络进行了对比分析,得出了以下几点结论:
     第一,网络节点特征、产品技术含量、制度环境条件决定着创新网络的类别和特征。光电子产业是比较特殊的高技术产业部门,除了具有风险大、技术含量高的特点外,还具有技术融合度高、技术合作要求高、产品应用范围广的特点。光电子产业创新网络则具有产品技术复杂、节点异质程度高的特征。借助社会网络分析方法,笔者分析了光电子产业网络的形成过程、影响因素、网络链接方式、网络节点空间格局等问题。
     第二,政府支持下各利益主体的合作研发对光电子产业创新网络的形成和发展具有十分重要的影响。技术的成熟和完善程度、缄默知识的传播以及知识产权保护等直接影响着网络联系的方式和强度。尽管创新主体之间的合作越来越密切,企业网络化趋势越来越明显,但高水平完善的创新网络也无法一蹴而就。
     第三,光电子产业创新网络的形成和发展具有历史偶然性和路径依赖的双重特征。中介组织为技术创新合作供需双方搭桥牵线,对马歇尔式创新网络的影响十分明显,而对轮轴式创新网络的影响十分有限。
     第四,政府支持对光电子产业创新网络发展的影响十分显著。联邦德国光电子产业创新网络发展的成功经验表明,除了发挥基层积极性、因地制宜之外,联邦政府和地方政府的资金援助、组织创新合作十分有效。正因为如此,德国四个重要的光电子产业密集区形成了各具地域特色、形态各异的光电子产业创新网络,有力地推动了德国创新型国家的建设和产业技术水平的全面提升。
     第五,我国光电子产业创新网络发展程度较低,自主创新十分有限,多具被动嵌入的特征。上海市是我国重要的光电子技术和产业基地,但光电子科研机构技术开发能力弱、官产学研一体化程度低、企业之间合作意愿不强、对外技术依赖程度高等问题,在一定程度上制约了上海光电子产业创新网络的健康发展,德国经验对上海发展具有一定的借鉴意义。
It is a must to change the lower competitiveness of high-tech industry in China.As anew high-tech sector,the photonic industry is featured by high technological standardand large contribution to improvement of national core competitiveness.Due to itstechnology intensiveness,the global photonic industry has an unevenly layout.It is ofgreat significance to analyze the feature of innovation network and the evolution ofphotonic industry in Germany.And it will be helpful to promote the development ofhigh-tech industry,as well as enriching the study of economic geography in China.
     The paper receives the academic support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft(DFG) project (Granted Code:62201094),China National Science Foundationproject(Granted Code:40371033) as well as the financial support from ChinaScholarship Council(Granted Code:2007u32111).Based on the documentationcollection and field survey in Germany and Shanghai,the paper pooled relatedmaterials for the study of Construction and Evolution of Photonic Industry InnovationNetwork in Germany and China.
     Through the review over documentation of home and abroad,the paper finds thestudies of innovation network are mainly from the perspective of firms or regions.The major research conclusions over network linkages,framework and evolution arebased on abstract deduction,while some scholars began to adopt empirical analysisapproach.The research focus of network gradually changes from simply descriptionto the function and mechanism analysis,with more attentions to the approach of socialnetwork analysis and simulation.
     Based on the review of theory in technological innovation system,innovation networkand industrial clusters,the thesis constructs a theoretical framework of innovationnetwork analysis in photonic industry.Following the Redline of network components(nodes,linkages,resources),network construction condition,structure characteristicand evolution path,the thesis makes a systematic study over the feature of photonicindustry networks.With the review over the photonic industry in Germany,the paper focuses its study on the formulation,development and evolution of its innovationnetwork as well as a comparative study over that of Shanghai.The paper has thefollowing conclusions:
     First,the construction of innovation network is fundamentally influenced by the thefeatures of network nodes,the technological character of products and theenvironment of network.As a special sector of high-tech industry,the photonicindustry share the commen feature of high developing risk and high intensity oftechnology with other high-tech sectors,as well as some specific characters oftechnological fusion and wide application.It needs strong technological cooperationduring the development of a new product in photonic industry.The innovationnetwork of photonic industry has thus the related features of complex technology andheterogeneity of nodes.The study that applied Social Network Analysis and evolutiontheory will be helpful for the finding of decisive factors of network construction,themode of network links and the regional disparity of nodes layout.
     Second,the contents of photonic industry innovation network are mainly based oncorporate R&D,accompanied by varied government influence.The standardization oftechnology and the application of tacit knowledge jointly affect the strongness andweakness of network linkages.At the same time,the density of corporate relationswill be affected by the intellectual property fights and technological know-how.Dueto the finite network density as well as corporate mode and contents,the corporatenetworking trend has its marking ends.
     Third,the photonic industry innovation networks are featured by historic coincidenceand path dependence.The intermediate organization in innovation network could bebetter functioned in Marshallian industrial district,while not so much in Spoke-Hubdistrict.The importance of core nodes in the innovation network could be perfect bythe well organization of intermediate organization.
     Fourth,the development of photonic industry embodies the will of a nation.Thegovernments of industrial advanced countries try to strengthen the technologicaladvantage through providing fund and organizing innovation cooperation.The federalgovernment and local governments of Germany adopt selective development strategyin varied photonic industrial clusters,formulating different shapes in the structure ofinnovation networks.
     Lastly,Chinese government is not well prepared in organizing of innovation inphotonic industry.Local photonic industry is mostly characterized by embeddedbranch of foreign companies.As a key city in developing photonic technology andindustry,the local research facilities do not act as the major technology providers.
引文
1.Agrawal, A.University-to-Industry Knowledge Transfer, Literature Review and Unanswered Questions [J].International Journal of Management Reviews, 2001,3(4):285-302.
    2.AIM (Advanced Institute of Management Research).Developing Photonics Clusters: Commonalities, Contrasts and Contradictions [R].2007.
    3.Albert, R.& A-L.Barab(?)si.Statistical mechanics of complex network [J].Review of Modern Physics, 2002, 74 (Jan.):47-97.
    4.Asheim, B.T.& A.Isaksen.Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local 'Sticky' and Global 'Ubiquitous' Knowledge [J].Journal of Technology Transfer, 2002, 27 (1):77-86.
    5.Asheim, B.T.& L.Coenen Contextualising Regional Innovation Systems in a Globalising Learning Economy: On Knowledge Bases and Institutional Frameworks[J].Journal of Technology Transfer, 2006, 31 (1): 163-173.
    6.Baptista, R.& P.Swann.Do firms in clusters innovate more? [J].Research Policy, 1998, 27 (5):525-540.
    7.Barab(?)si, A.& R.Albert.“Emergence of scaling in random networks”, Science, 1999, 286: 509-512.
    8.Bathelt, H.'Geographies of Production: Growth Regimes in Spatial Perspectives 1-Innovation, Institutions and Social Systems' [J].Progress in Human Geography,2003,27 (6), 789-804.
    9.Behr, M., Engel, T.; Kottmann, A.2002: Wirtschaftlicher Optimismus!-Versiegende Fachkr(a|¨)ftebasis?.Ergebnisse einer Gesch(a|¨)ftsf(u|¨)hrerbefragung zu Besch(a|¨)ftigungsperspektiven und Entwicklungsm(o|¨)glichkeiten der Optonet-Region in Th(u|¨)ringen(Forschungsbericht).Jena: IPRAS.
    10.Berg, A.Commercial applications of optoelectronics[J],Photonics sprctra, 2006 (February):54-61.
    11.Bistow, G.Everyone's a 'winner': problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness [J]Journal of Economic Geography, 2005, 5(3):285-304.
    12.Borgatti, S.P., M.G.Everett, L.C.Freeman.Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis[M].Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.2002.
    13.Boschma, R.A.'Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment'[J].Regional Studies, 2005, 39(1):61-74.
    14.Boschma, R.A.& Anne L.J.ter WalKnowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the South of Italy[J].Industry & Innovation, 2007, 14 (2):177-199.
    15.Boschma, R.A.& Frenken, K.Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography [J].Journal of EconomicGeography, 2006(6): 273-302.
    16.Boschma, R.A.& Lambooy, J.G.Evolutionary economics and economic geography [J].Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1999, 9(4):411-429.
    17.Bramwell A., Nelles J., Wolfe D.A.'Knowledge, Innovation and Institutions: Global and Local Dimensions of the ICT Cluster in Waterloo, Canada'[J],Regional Studies, 2008, 42(1): 101-116.
    18.Branson, J.Transfer Technology Knowledge by International Corporation to Developing Countries [J].American Economics Review, 1966, (3):259-267.
    19.Brennenraedts R., R.Bekkers, B.Verspagen, The different cnannels of university-industry knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence from Biomedical Engineering [A], Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, The Netherlands, Working Paper.2006.
    20.Breschi, S.& Lissoni, F.(2003) Mobility and social networks: Localised knowledge spillovers revisited [A].http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/dw2003-694.pdf.21.Bohn, R.Measuring and Managing Technological Knowledge [J].Sloan Management Review, 1994, (9):61-73.
    22.Brenner, T.Identification of Local Industrial Clusters in Germany [J].Regional Studies, 2006, 40 (9):991-1004.
    23.Budd, L.& Hirmis, A.(2004) 'Conceptual Framework for Regional Competitiveness'[J].Regional Studies, 38(9):1015-1028.
    24.Buenstorf,G.Evolution on the Shoulders of Giants: Entrepreneurship and Firm Survival in the German Laser Industry [J].Review ofIndustrial Organization, 2007 (30):179-202.
    25.Burt, R.'Structural holes: The social structure of competition'[C].in N.Nohria and R.Eccles(eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action, Boston: HarvardBusiness School Press 1992: 57-91.
    26. Camagni, R. Local 'milieu', uncertainty and innovation networks: towards a new dynamic theory of economic space. In: Camagni, R. (Ed.), Innovation Networks. Belhaven Press,London, 1991: 121-144.
    
    27. Camagni, R. On the concept of territorial competitiveness: sound or misleading? [J]. Urban Studies, 2002, 39 (13): 2395-2411.
    
    28. Cantner & Graf.The network of innovators in Jena: An applicationof social network analysis [J]. Research Policy 2006 (35):463-480.
    
    29. Carbonara, N. Innovation processes within geographical clusters: A Cognitive Approach [J].Technovation. 2004, 24 (1) 17-28.
    
    30. Coleman J.S. 'Social capital in the creation of human capital' [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988(94):95-120.
    
    31. Cooke, P. The New Wave of Regional Innovation Networks: Analysis, Characteristics and Strategy [J]. Small Business Economics, 1996, (8): 159-171.
    
    32. Cooke, P. Regions in a global market: the experience of Wales and Baden-Wuerttemburg [J].Review of International Political Economy, 1997 (4), 349—381.
    
    33. Cooke, P. Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence from Biotechnology Clusters [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2002,27 (1): 133-145.
    
    34. Cooke, P. & K.Morgan. The Intelligent Region: Industrial and Institutional Restructuring in Emilia-Romagna [R]. Regional Industrial Research Report No. 7, University of Wales,Cardiff. 1991.
    
    35. Cooke P., Uranga M., Etxebarria G Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions [J]. Research Policy. 1997, 26(4-5):475-491.
    
    36. Council on Competitiveness. Innovate America: Thriving in a World of Challenge and Change[R]. http://innovateamerica.org/webscr/Innovate%20America%20Final.pdf.2004.
    
    37. Debresson, C. & F.Amesse Networks of innovation: a review and introduction to the issue[J].Research Policy, 1991, (20):363-379.
    
    38. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY.Competitiveness White Paper[R], London,1998 http://www.planotecnologico.pt/InnerPage.aspx?idCat=202&idMasterCat=37&idLang=2.
    
    39. DING K. Distribution System of China's Industrial Clusters: Case Study of Yiwu China Commodity City[A], DISCUSSION PAPER No. 75, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan.2006,
    
    40. Dodgson M., J. Mathews, T. Kastelle, Mei-Chih Hu.The evolving nature of Taiwan's national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks [J], Research Policy,2008, 37 (3) 430-445.
    
    41. Dunford, ML, 'Industrial districts, magic circles and the restructuring and the Italian textiles and clothing chain', Economic Geography, 2006, 82(1): 27-59.
    
    42. Dyer J.H. & Noboeka K. Creating and Managing a High Performance Knowledge Sharing Network: the Case of Toyota [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, Special issue 21(3):345-368.
    
    43. Fabrice, C. The use of Social Network Analysis in Innovation Research: A literature review [EB/OL]. www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/dw2005-1613.pdf.2005.
    
    44. Fallick, B. C.& A. Fleischmann & James B. Rebitzer. Job Hopping in Silicon Valley: Some Evidence Concerning the Micro-Foundations of a High Technology Cluster [A]. Published in Oct., 2005; cited in Oct., 2007. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11710.
    
    45. Freeman, C. Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues [J]. Research Policy,1991, (20):499-514.
    
    46. Freeman, C.Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness [J].Industrial and Corporate Change, 2004, 13 (3):541-569.
    
    47. Frenken, K. & R.A.Boschma. A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process [J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2007, (7): 635-649.
    
    48. Frietscha R. & H.Grupp.There's a new man in town: the paradigm shift in optical technology [J], Technovation, 2006, (26): 13-29.
    
    49. Gay, B. & B. Dousset. Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry [J]. Research Policy, 2005 (34)1457-1475.
    
    50. Gilbert, N. A Simulation of the Structure of Academic Science [J/OL] .Sociological Research Online, 1997, 2(2) http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/3.html.
    
    51. Gilbert N., A. Pyka, P. Ahrweiler.Innovation Networks - A Simulation Approach [J/OL] .Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2001, 4(3)http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/3/8.html.
    52.Giuliani, E.The structure of cluster knowledge networks: uneven and selective, not pervasive and collective[A].DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference.2005.
    53.Gordon, I.R.& P.McCann.Clusters, Innovation and Regional Development [J].Journal of Economic Geography, 2005, 5 (5): 523-543.
    54.Granovetter, M.S.`The strength of weak ties'[J].American Journal of Sociology, 1973 (78): 1360-1380.
    55.Grupp, H.Learning in a Science-driven Market: The Case of Lasers [J], Industrial and Corporate Change, 2000, 9(1):143-172.
    56.H(?)kansson, H.Industrial technological development: A network approach.Croom Helm Ltd., London.1987.
    57.Hassink, R.& M.Wood.Geographic 'clustering' in the German optoelectronics, industry: its impact on R & D collaboration and innovation[J],Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1998, 10 (4):277-296.
    58.Hendry C., J.Brown, R.Defillippi, R.Hassink.Industry clusters as commercial, knowledge and institutional networks: Optoelectronics in Six Regions in the UK, USA and Germany[C].In Anna Grandori, Inter-firm Networks: Organization and Industrial Competitiveness, 1999: 151-184.
    59.Hendry C., J.Brown, R.Defillippi.Regional Clustering of High Technology-based Firms: Opto-electronics in Three Countries [J], Regional Studies, 2000, 34 (2): 129-144(16).60.Hendry C., J.Brown, H-D.Ganter, S.Hilland.Understanding Innovation: How firms innovate and what governments can do to help-Wales and Thuringia compared [R].Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society.www.agf.org.uk.2002.
    61.Hendry C., J.Brown, H-D Ganter, S.Hilland.”Facilitating innovation in opto-electronics in a national, global, and regional context”[J].Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy.2003:21(1) 53-70.
    62.Hendry, C.& Brown, J.Dynamics of Clustering and Performance in the UK Optoelectronics Industry Regional Studies[J],the Journal of the Regional Studies Association, 2006, 40(7): 707-725.
    63.Hite J.M.& Hesterly W.S.The Evolution of Firm Networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2001, (22):275-286.
    64.Hobday.Product Complexity, Innovation and Industrial Organisation [DB/OL], www.cops.ac.uk/pdf/cpn52.pdf. 1998. CoPS working paper Publication No52, downloaded on Apr.5, 2009.
    
    65. Ijiri Y. & Kuhn R.L. New Directions in Creative and Innovative Management: Bridging Theory and Practice, Ballinger Publishing. 1988.
    
    66. 1PRAS. Evaluation der Kompetenznetze Optische Technologien Deutschland—Im Auftrag des VD1-TZ, IPRAS / FSU Jena - Ergebnisse Evaluation OT [R]. Mainz.2007.
    
    67. KAPID. Market Trends and Activity. ICOIA Annual International Congress, 2006. Hong Kong, China.
    
    68. Keteis C, Lindqvist G., S(?)lvell (?). Cluster lintiatives in Developing and Transition Economics [DB/OL]. Center for Strategy and Competitiveness, Stockholm. 2006.
    
    69. Kitson, M., R.Martin, P.Tyler. 'Regional Competitiveness: An Elusive yet Key Concept?'[J].Regional Studies, 2004, 38(9): 991-999.
    
    70. Koschatzky K., M. Kulicke, A.Zenker. Innovation networks: concepts and challenges in the European perspective [M]. Springer, 2001.
    
    71. Kodama F. Emerging Patterns of Innovation: Sources of Japan's Technological Edge.Harvard Business Press. 1995.
    
    72. Liefner. I. . S. Hennemann, H. Wang. Geography of Knowledge: a Unipartite Spatial Network Analysis of China's Optical Technology Sector. Submitted to Economic Geography [A]. 2008.(under review)
    
    73. Markusen, A. Studying regions by studying firms [J]. Professional Geographer, 1994(46):477-490.
    
    74. Markusen, A. Sticky Places in Slippery Spaces[C]. in Barnes & Gertler(ed.) The New Industrial Geography: Regions. Regulations and Institutions, Routledge 1999: 98-126.
    
    75. Mailing, R. & Sunley, P. Deconstructing Clusters: Chaotic Concept of Policy Panacea? [J].Journal of Economic Geography, 2003, 3(1): 5-35.
    
    76. Mathews J.A. & HU MEI-CHIH Enhancing the Role of Universities in Building National Innovative Capacity in Asia: The Case of Taiwan [J], World Development, 2007,35(6): 1005-1020.
    
    77. Mayer, A. Optech Consulting Optische Technologien Wirtschaftliche Bedeutung in Deutschland, BMBF, 2007.
    
    78. Morgan, K. The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal [J]. Regional Studies, 1997, 31(5): 491-503.
    
    79. Morgan K. The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems [J], Journal of Economic Geography, 2004, (4): 3-22.
    
    80. Morgan, K. The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal [J].Regional Studies, 2007, 31(5) 491-503.
    
    81. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: AComparative Analysis [M]. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1993.
    
    82. Newman M E J. The structure and function of complex networks [J]. SLAM Review, 2003,(45):167-256.
    
    83. Nooteboom, B & V. A.Gilsing. Density and Strength of Ties in Innovation Networks: A Competence and Governance View. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2004-005-ORG.Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=496711. 2004.
    
    84. NRC (National Research Council): Harnessing Light: Optical Science and Engineering for the 21st Century[R], the National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 1998.
    
    85. OECD. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development - Frascati Manual [R], Paris. 1993.
    
    86. OECD. Cities and Regions in the New Learning Economy [R]. ISBN: 9789264185685.2001.
    
    87. OECD.Oslo Manual GUIDELINES FOR COLLECTING AND INTERPRETING [NNOVATION DATA (Third edition) [R].Paris, 2005.
    
    88. Ouimet, M., Landry, R., Amara, N. Network positions and radical innovation: a social network analysis of the Quebec optics and photonics cluster [A]. Paper to be presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2004 on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development,Elsiore, Denmark. 2004. www.druid.dk/uploads/tx picturedb/ds2004-1325.pdf.
    
    89. OIDA. Optoelectronics technology and roadmaps. ICOIA Annual International Congress.Hong Kong, China .2006.
    
    90. OIDA. Global Optoelectronics Industry Market Report and Forecast (eccerpt)[EB/OL].http://www.oida.org. 2007.
    
    91. OITDA. Market Trend and Key Emerging Highlights in Optoelectronics in Japan, ICOIA Annual International Congress. Hong Kong, China.2006.
    
    92. Optech-consulting. World Market for Lasers and Laser Systems 2006[R]. http://www.optech-consulting.com/lasertechnologymarkets.html . 2007.
    
    93. OpTech-Net. Overview of Market Trends and Key Emerging Highlights[R], ICOIA Annual International Congress, Hong Kong, China, 2006.
    
    94. OptoNet.OptecNet 2006: Mitglieder[R]. http://www.optecnet.de/wirueberuns/Mitgliedschaft.
    
    95. Padmore, T. & H. Gibson. Modeling systems of innovation: II. A framework for industrial cluster analysis in regions. Research Policy. 1998, 26(6):625-641.
    
    96. Photonics21.Towards a Bright Future for Europe: Strategic Research Agenda in Photonics[R],www.Photonics21.org , 2006.
    
    97. PIDA.Worldwide Market and Worldwide Market and the Development of Taiwan Photonics Industry. ICOIA Meeting. http://www.hkoea.org/icoia/download.htm. 2006.
    
    98. Pinch S., Henry N., Jenkins M., Tallman S. From 'industrial districts' to 'knowledge clusters':a model of knowledge dissemination and competition in industrial agglomerations [J],Journal of Economic Geography, 2003(3): 373-388.
    
    99. Phillips S-A M. & H. W-C Yeung. A Place for R&D? The Singapore Science Park [J], Urban Studies, 2003, 40 (4): 707-732.
    
    100. Pittaway, L., M.Robertson, K. Munir, D. Denyer, A. Neely. Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence [J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2004,5-6(3-4):137-168.
    
    101. Porter M. E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations [M]. Basingstoke, Macmillan. 1990.
    
    102. Porter M. E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance[R].Issue 10. PA Consulting Group, London. 1992.
    
    103. Porter M.E. Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Companies, Governments and Institutions [M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 1997.
    
    104. Porter M. E. On Competition [M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998 (a).
    
    105. Porter M.E. Location, clusters and the new economics of competition [J]. Business Economics, 1998(b), (33): 7-17.
    
    106. Porter M.E. location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy [J]. Economic Development Quarterly, 2000(14): 15-34.
    
    107. Porter M. E. Regions and the new economics of competition[C], in Scott, A. J. (Ed.) Global City Regions, Oxford: Blackwell. 2001 (a):139-152.
    
    108. Porter M.E. Cluster of Innovation: Regional Foundations of US Competitiveness [R]. Council on Competitiveness, Washington, DC. 2001 (b).
    109. Porter M. E. The economic performance of regions [J], Regional Studies, 2003, (37):549-578.
    110. Powell, W. W. NeitherMarket nor Hierarchy: Network forms of Organization [C]. in B. M.Staw and L. L. Cummints, eds., Research in Organizational Behavior, 1990 (12): 295-336.
    111.Powell, W. W., D.R.White, K.W.Koput, J.Owen-Smith. Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Inter-organizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences [J].American Journal of Sociology, 2005,110 (4): 1132-1205
    
    112. Robertson P.L. & R. N. Langlois. Innovation, networks, and vertical integration [J]. Research Policy, 1995, 24 (4): 543-562.
    
    113. Robin, C. Network models of innovation and knowledge diffusion, MERJT-Infonomics Research Memorandum series, 2004,http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/rmpdf/2004/rm2004-016.pdf(Dec. 17, 2008)
    
    114. Rothwell, R. Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process [J]. International Marketing Review, 1994, 11(1):7-31.
    
    115. Schricke, E. Lokalisierungsmuster und Entwicklungsdynamik von Clustern der Optischen Technologienin Deutschland: Untersucht am Beispiel von Clusterstrukturen in Thuringen,Bayern und Niedersachsen [D]. Universit(?)t Hannover Dissertation. 2007.
    
    116.Scott, A. Flexible Production Systems and Regional Development: The Rise of New Industrial Spaces in North America and Western Europe [C]. in Trevor J. Barnes, Jamie Peck,Eric Sheppard, Adam Tickell (ed.) Reading Economic Geography, Blackwell Publishing Ltd,2004:125-136.
    
    117. Scott, J. Social Network Analysis: a handbook [M]. SAGE Publications. 2000.
    
    118. Saxenian, A.L. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128[M]. Boston: Harvard University Press. 1994.
    
    119. Spectaris. The optical, medical and mechatronical industry in Germany[R]. Industry Report,2005.
    
    120. Spetaris. Hightech, Innovation und Wachstum- Die optische, medizinische und mechatronishche industrie in Deutschland [R]. Branchenbericht, 2008.
    
    121. SPIE.Optics and Photonics Clusters [DB/OL]. http://www.photonicsclusters.com/.2008.
    
    122. Storper, M. Institutions in a Learning Economy, Paper presented to the OECD Conference 'Employment Growth in a Knowledge-based Economy', Copenhagen, Denmark, 1995 (a).
    
    123. Storper, M. Competitiveness policy options; the technology-regions connection[J], Growth and Change, 1995(b),Spring, 285-308.
    
    124. Sydow J., A.Windeler, F.LerchBewertung und Begleirung der Netzwerkentwicklung von OpTecBB - Abschlussbericht[R].2008.
    
    125. Tallman & Jenkins, Alliance, Knowledge Flows, and Performance in Regional Clusters[C]..Contractor. F.J. & Lorange, P. (eds.) Co-operative Strategies and Allicances. Pergamon,Amsterdam. 2002:163-187.
    
    126. Todtling, F. & Trippl, M. Knowledge links in high-technology industries: Markets, Networks or Milieu? The case of the Vienna biotechnology cluster.Paper prepared for the DRUID tenth Anniversary Summer Conference, June 27~(th) - 29~(th), 2005,Copenhagen.www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/ds2005-1526.pdf.
    
    127. Tracey & Gordon. Alliances, Networks and Competitive Strategy: Rethinking Clusters of Innovation [J]. Growth and Change. 2003, 34 (1): 1-16.
    
    128.UN1DO. INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERS AND POVERTY REDUCTION, Towards a methodology for poverty and social impact assessment of cluster development initiatives[R],Vienna.ORIGINAL ARTICLE.2004.
    
    129. Utterback, J.M. & Abemathy, W.J. A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation [J].OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science, 1975,3 (6)639-656.
    
    130. Uzzi, B. 'Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness'[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997(42): 35-67.
    
    131.VDI Technologiezentrum GmbH. Bildungsangebote der Hochschulen in den Optischen Technologien: Bestandsaufnahme und Analyse[R]. D(?)sseldorf .Februar 2004.
    
    132. Wasserman S & Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1994.
    
    133. Watts D. J. & Strogatz S. H., Collective dynamics of "small-world" networks[J], Nature, 393(1998)440-442.
    
    134. Watts. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age [M]. Norton, New York. 2003.
    135.Wellman, B. "Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance'Tresents network analytic theory, with substantive examples. in Social Structures a Network Approach, edited by Wellman B. & S.D. Berkowitz. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988: 19-61.
    136.Zander, I.How do you mean “global”? An empirical investigation of innovation networks in multinational corporation[J],Research Policy, 1999, 28 (2-3):195-213.
    137.巴泽尔.H.产业集群研究的新视角[J].世界地理研究,2005,14(1):1-8.
    138.波特.M.国家竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社,1998:68.
    139.陈学光.网络能力、创新网络及创新绩效关系研究—以浙江高新技术企业为例[D].杭州:浙江大学,2007: 68-71.
    140.陈阳.全球价值链下上海半导体照明产业升级研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2007:26.
    141.蔡宁,吴结兵.产业集群企业网络体系:系统建构与结构分析[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2006.12(2):9-14.
    142.蔡宁,吴结兵,殷鸣.产业集群复杂网络的结构与功能分析[J].经济地理,2006,26(3):378-392.
    143.蔡宁,潘松挺.网络关系强度与企业技术创新模式的耦合性及其协同演化——以海正药业技术创新网络为例[J].中国工业经济,2008, (4):137-144.
    144.曹健林,樊仲维.关于发展我国光电子产业的思考[J].光机电信息,2001(1):6-11.
    145.长城战略咨询.韩国平板显示产业:后进国家的跨越式发展模式[J].科技智囊.2006 (9): 32-35.
    146.陈苗海.中国激光加工产业现状和发展前景[J].激光与红外,2004,34(1):73-77.
    147.陈孝先.技术特性对技术转移的影响初探[J].科学管理研究,2004(3):32-34.
    148.池仁勇、汤临佳,企业外部创新网络与创新源的关联性特征研究[J].科技进步与对策,2008,25(11:38-40.
    149.范钧.区域软环境对企业竞争力的作用机制及其评价体系[J].科研管理,2007, 28 (2):99-104.
    150.樊霞,朱桂龙.基于小世界模型的企业创新网络研究[J].软科学,2008, 22(1):126-128.
    151.冯德连.经济全球化下产业集群的创新机制研究[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(5): 46-49.
    152.傅家骥.技术创新学.清华大学出版社.1998.
    153.干福熹.发展我国光电子产业的若干思考[R].中国科协2001年学术年会分会场特邀报告154.盖文启,王缉慈(a).论区域的技术创新模式及其创新网络——以北京中关村地区为例[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999, 36(5):29-36
    155.盖文启,王缉慈(b).论区域创新网络对我国高新技术中小企业发展的作用[J].中国软科学, 1999 (9):102-106
    156.关士续.区域创新网络在高技术产业发展中的作用——关于硅谷创新的一种诠释[J].自然辩证法通讯,2002,24(2):51-56.
    157.顾朝林,王恩儒,石爱华.“新经济地理学”与经济地理学的分异与对立[J].地理学报,2002,57(4):497-504.
    158.黄泰岩,牛飞亮.西方企业网络理论与企业家的成长[J].中国工业经济,1999, (2) :75-78.
    159.洪勇、苏敬勤.自主创新导向的我国复杂产品系统合作创新网络研[J].中国科技论坛,2008 (9):30-32.
    160.季国平.中国平板显示器产业的发展[J].硅酸盐通报,2005,(5):29-36.
    161.贾根良.网络组织:超越市场与企业两分法[J].经济社会体制比较,1998,(4):13-19
    162.景秀艳.网络权力及其影响下的企业空间行为研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2007:25
    163.景秀艳,曾刚.全球与地方的契合:权力与生产网络的二维治理[J].人文地理,2007(3):22-27
    164.景秀艳,曾刚.从对称到非对称:内生型产业集群权力结构演化及其影响研究[J].经济问题探索.2006,(10) :41-44.
    165.李二玲、李小建.基于社会网络分析方法的产业集群研究——以河南省虞城县南庄村钢卷尺产业集群为例[J].人文地理,2007, (6): 10-15,128.
    166.李海华,王宇.“光谷”现状与展望[J].光机电信息,(2002), (5) :50-52.
    167.李金华.广义创新网络的演化结构及其现实意义[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008 (2):101-107.
    168.李兰冰.区域创新网络的多层次发展动因与演进机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2008,25(11): 45-48.
    169.李守伟,钱省三,沈运红.基于产业网络的创新扩散机制研究[J].科研管理,2007, 28(4):49-55.
    170.李小建.经济地理学中的企业网络研究[J].经济地理,2002,22 (5) :516-520.
    171.李小建,李国平,曾刚等.经济地理学(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:4-5.
    172.李新春.专业镇与企业创新网络[J].广东社会科学,2000(6):29-33.
    173.林兰,曾刚。技术扩散空间尺度与高新技术企业布局[J].科技管理研究,2006(7):70-74.
    174.梁浩.企业网络理论的现状及国内研究中的困境[J].江淮论坛,2006 (3):33-37.
    175.刘存福,侯光明,李存金.2005.中小民营企业集群的社会网络分析及发展趋势探[J].科学学与科学技术管理(7) :144-148.
    176.刘锦英,聂鸣.产业集群的创新动力及其形成机制分析[J].经济经纬,2006 (3): 40-43.
    177.刘军.社会网络分析导论.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:113-182.
    178.刘颂豪.21世纪的光电子产业[J].光电子技术与信息,2000,13(5):1-11.
    179.刘颂豪.光纤激光器的新进展[J].光电子技术与信息,2003,16 (1) :1-8.
    180.刘颂豪.光电子技术与产业[J].激光与光电子学进展,2004, 41(4):1-13.
    181.刘涛,陈忠,陈晓荣.复杂网络理论及其应用研究概述明.系统工程,2005,23(6):1-7.
    182.刘铁根,张凡,查英.光电子技术及产业区域发展设想[J].光电子技术与信息,2004,17(3):1-5,
    183.刘友金,刘莉君.基于混沌理论的集群式创新网络演化过程研究[J].科学学研究,2008, 26(1):185-190.
    184.柳卸林.技术创新经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1993:12-15.
    185.罗家德.NQ风暴——关系管理的智慧.北京:科学文献出版社.2002:37-57.
    186.骆品亮,杨树.我国基因工程制药业创新网络结构特征分析与发展对策[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(1):64-69.
    187.马骏,唐方成,郭菊娥,席酉民.复杂网络理论在组织网络研究中的应用[J].科学学研究,2005.23(2):173-178.
    188.苗长虹.马歇尔产业区理论的复兴及其理论意义[J].地域研究与开发,2004,23(1):1-6.
    189.苗长虹.全球-地方联结与产业集群的技术学习——以河南许昌发制品产业为例[J].地理学报,2006,425-434.
    190.苗长虹,崔立华.产业集聚:地理学与经济学主流观点的对比[J].人文地理,2003,18(3):2-46.
    191.慕继丰,冯宗宪,陈方丽.企业网络的运行机理与企业的网络管理能力[J].外国经济与管理,2001,23(10):21-25.
    192.诺斯.D,经济史的结构与变迁,上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
    193.潘旭明.战略联盟的信任机制:基于社会网络的视角[J].财经科学,2006, (5) :50-56.
    194.平全虎,孔庆新.对技术定义的思索[J].电力学报,2004, (19)4:306-308.
    195.丘海雄,徐建牛.产业集群技术创新中的地方政府行为[J].管理世界,2004(10):36-46.
    196.丘海雄,崔强.剖析集群创新[J].学术研究,2004,(7):25-31.
    197.芮鸿程.规模化与敏捷化经营之路:企业网络——理论透视与实践的剖析[J].管理现代化,2004 (2):8-12.
    198.孙国强.网络组织的内涵、特征与构成要素[J].南开管理评论,2001 (4) :38-40.
    199.孙华,激光璀灿,前景辉煌——全球激光产业发展及市场前景展望[J].科技创业月刊2002, (9) :17—18.
    200.孙劭方.高新区创新网络的运行机制研究[J].决策探索.2003 (1) :22-23.
    201.孙文.中国激光材料加工发展现状:巨大的差距、澎湃的潜力、辉煌的前景[J].激光与光电子学进展,2004,41(1) :54-56.
    202.孙耀吾.基于技术标准的高技术企业技术创新网络研究[D]长沙:湖南大学,2007:31.
    203.唐国庆.上海光电子产业发展及机遇[R].Hongkong, ICOIA meeting China Forum,2006
    204.陶良虎,张道金.产业竞争力理论体系的构建[N].光明日报,第7版理论与实践,2006-02-07.
    205.童昕,王缉慈.论全球化背景下的本地创新网络[J].中国软科学.2000 (9):80-83
    206.王安宇.合作研发组织模式选择与治理机制研究:兼论我国松散性企业集团研发体系重构[D].上海:复旦大学.2003.
    207.王春梅,袁继祖.高新技术产业集群创新体系框架模型实证分析[J].科技进步与对策.2006 (7): 124-126.
    208.王大洲.高技术产业创新的治理——美国硅谷的创新网络及其启示[J].决策借鉴.2001(a) ,14 (4):59-62.
    209.王大洲.企业创新网络的进化与治理:一个文献综述[J].科研管理.2001 (b), 22(5):96-103.
    210.王大洲.企业创新网络的进化机制分析[J].科学学研究,2006,24 (5) :780-787.
    211.王灏,曾刚.集群创新网络与上海张江高科技园区软件业的发展[J].地域研究与开发,2008,27 (4):9-14.
    212.王灏.德国光电子产业集群的创新网络建设与启示[J].企业活力,2009, (1) :62-63.
    213.王缉慈.简评新产业区的国际学术讨论[J].地理科学进展,1998, (3) :1-7.
    214.王缉慈.创新的空间——企业集群与区域发展[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
    215.王缉慈,创新及其相关概念的跟踪观察——返璞归真、认识进化和前沿发现[J],中国软科学,2002(12):30-34.
    216.王剑锋,创新网络的结构特征对集群创新影响的理论与应用研究[D],成都:电子科技大学,2007:32-33.
    217.王琳.中国光电产业现状与中国光学光电子行业协会发展[J].激光与红外.2006,36(增刊):817-821.
    218.王琳,肖勤,曾刚.上海浦东新区电子信息与生物医药企业创新合作网络比较研究[J].地域研究与开发.2005, 24(5):34-37.
    219.王琳,曾刚.浦东新区中小高新技术企业创新合作网络构成特征研究[J].地域研究与开 发,2006, 25(2):35-38.
    220.王晓健,郭跃华.社会网络视角下战略联盟关键问题研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005,(10) :8-11.
    221.魏江.创新系统演进和集群创新系统构建[J].自然辩证法通讯.2004.26 (1):48-54.
    222.文贯中.中国的疆域变化与走出农本社会的冲动——李约瑟之谜的经济地理学解析[J].经济学季刊,(2005) 4(2) :519-540.
    223.文嫮、曾刚.全球价值链治理与地方产业网络升级研究——以上海浦东集成电路产业网络为例[J].中国工业经济,2005 (7) :20-27.
    224.邬爱其.集群企业网络化成长机制研究—对浙江三个产业集群的实证研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2004:68-85.
    225.邬爱其.企业创新网络构建与演进的影响因素实证分析[J].科学学研究,2006,24(1):141-149.
    226.吴结兵,蔡宁.产业集群理论述评——从三个角度看集群理论的融合与发展.重庆大学学报(社会科学版)[J].2006,13 (6) :16-21.
    227.吴结兵,徐梦周.网络视角下产业集群竞争优势:理论模型与实证研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008, 38 (4) :163-172.
    228.吴金闪,狄增如.从统计物理学看复杂网络研究[J].物理学进展.2004.24(1):18-46.
    229.吴红,杜严勇.创造与创新辨析——兼论创造学与创新学[J].科学管理研究,2007,25(3):31-33,41.
    230.吴永忠.企业创新网络的形成及其演化[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21 (9) :69-72.
    231.肖鸿.试析当代社会网研究的若干进展[J].社会学研究,1999, (3) :1-11.
    232.谢伟,吴贵生.技术学习的功能和来源[J].科研管理,2000,21 (1) :8-13.
    233.许小虎,项保华.企业网络理论发展脉络与研究内容综述[J].科研管理,2006,27(1):114-122.
    234.杨锐、黄国安.网络位置和创新——杭州手机产业集群的社会网络分析[J].工业技术经济,2005,24(7):114-118.
    235.易将能,孟卫东,杨秀苔.区域创新网络演化的阶段性研究[J].科研管理,2005, 26(5):24-28.
    236.殷国鹏,莫云生,陈禹.利用社会网络分析促进隐性知识管理[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2006, 46(S1):964-969.
    237.原长弘,贾一伟.国内创新网络研究基本状况和主要进展[J].科学学研究,2003,21(5):552-555.
    238.曾刚.技术扩散与区域经济发展[J].地域研究与开发,2002,21(3):38-41.
    239.曾刚,丰志勇,林兰.基于科技中介服务机构的产业密集区技术扩散研究[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008.
    240.曾刚,林兰.不同空间尺度的技术扩散影响因子研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(2):22-27.
    241.曾刚,林兰.技术扩散与高技术企业区位研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    242.张存刚,李明,陆德梅.社会网络分析——一种重要的社会学研究方法[J].甘肃社会科学,2004,(2):109-111.
    243.张靖,刘刚明,田坤,廖柯.大功率半导体激光器最新研究进展[J].半导体光电,2007,(2):151-155.
    244.张其仔.新经济社会学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社.2001:33-50.
    245.张伟峰,万威武.企业创新网络的构建动因与模式研究[J].研究与发展管理,2004,16(3):62-68.
    246.张治河,胡树华.“中国光谷”的竞争态势及其人才战略[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2001,1(3):21-24.
    247.张治河,胡树华,李正元.“中国光谷”与产业创新[J],中南财经政法大学学报,2002 (1):55-58
    248.赵玉林.创新经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2006:14
    249.朝阳,慢光.2006年激光产业发展分析(一)[J].激光与光电子学进展,2007(4):72-75.
    250.周少华.平板显示领域的知识产权竞争[J].中国发明与专利,2008,(10):47-48
    251.周涛,柏文洁,汪秉宏,刘之景,严钢.复杂网络研究概述[J],物理,2005,34(1):31-36.
    252.周仲麒.关于我国光纤产业现状及几点看法[J].当代通讯,2005(6):12-15.
    253.朱国宏,桂勇.经济社会学导论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2005:234.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700