杭州湾南岸大桥建设区域大型底栖动物群落生态学研究
|
摘要
底栖动物是滩涂湿地生态系统的重要组成部分,大型底栖动物群落决定着滩涂湿地生态系统的许多重要的生态过程。对滩涂大型底栖动物群落的研究不仅在群落生态学方面具有理论价值,而且对滩涂湿地生态环境、滩涂资源开发及生物多样性的保护也有重要的现实意义和应用价值。
本文以浙江省宁波慈溪庵东镇杭州湾跨海大桥建设区域具有代表性的滩涂湿地(泥滩)为研究基地,在中等尺度上对滩涂湿地生态系统中的大型底栖动物群落进行了研究,探讨了杭州湾跨海大桥工程建设区域不同潮带大型底栖动物群落的结构特征及分布、功能群及营养等级的季节动态,同时也选取该地区的优势种群之一伍氏厚蟹,对比其在工程建设区域与自然滩涂生境中的种群特征及回归关系。
主要研究结果如下:
(一)2006年5月至2007年1月,在杭州湾南岸大桥建设区域潮间带按季节取样对大型底栖动物群落进行了研究。共发现大型底栖动物32种,隶属6门7纲l 8科,主要为软体动物、节肢动物和环节动物多毛类。物种获得数潮位间差异极显著(F_(2,6)=75.71,P＜0.01),季节间差异显著(F_(3,6)=6.58,P＜0.05)。高潮带、中潮带和低潮带的密度、生物量分别为:97.00±13.13 ind/m~2,34.89±9.82 g/m~2;126.00±23.08 ind/m~2,33.25±9.54 g/m~2;13.75±2.32 ind/m~2,2.76±0.53g/m~2。密度季节间差异不显著(F_(3,6)=0.91,P＞0.05),潮位差异显著(F_(2,6)=10.48,P＜0.05);生物量季节间差异不显著(F_(3,6)=4.27,P＞0.05),潮位差异极显著(F_(2,6)=10.94,P＜0.01)。各多样性指数在潮带间差异显著,季节间则只有Margalef种类丰度(S)和Shannon-Wiener指数(H′)存在显著性差异;Margalef物种丰富度指数、Shannon-weiner多样性指数和Pielou均匀度指数4季平均数表现为:高潮带＞中潮带＞低潮带;Simpson优势度指数表现为:低潮带＞中潮带＞高潮带。对4季3潮带12个群落进行聚类和排序分析可以看出,中高潮带界限不明显,低潮带和中高潮带的界线明显。分析表明:生境条件的不同是大型底栖群落组成差异的主要原因,同一站位大型底栖动物群落物种组成在各季节之间有显著差异。
(二)根据其食性类型将所采的大型底栖动物划分为5种功能群。用功能群方法对这些物种与生境变化的关系进行了分析,结果表明,各功能群密度在季节间均不存在显著性差异,而在潮带间除了浮游生物食者外,其它类群均存在显著性差异;肉食者的种类数在潮带间不存在显著性差异,而在季节间存在显著性差异,其它功能群刚好相反。滩涂大型底栖动物群落主要包括4个营养级别,各营养级的构成密度在季节间差异不显著,在潮带间则差异显著;各营养级种类数是处于第四级的肉食者季节间差异显著,潮带间变化不显著,处于第二、三营养等级的功能群则正好相反。底栖动物功能群多样性综合反映了杭州湾南岸跨海大桥建设区域潮间带大型底栖动物群落变化情况。
(三)2004年7月中旬对杭州湾南岸伍氏厚蟹进行了取样调查和统计分析,结果表明:不同生境的种群密度、生物量,个体之间存在极显著差异。伍氏厚蟹的种群密度分别为:围垦滩涂23.00±5.86只/m~2,主要道路基地10.72±2.32只/m~2,自然滩涂6.36±1.43只/m~2;生物量:围垦滩涂172.27±43.89 g/m~2,主要道路基地120.28±26.03g/m~2,自然滩涂61.88±13.91g/m~2。整体样本及各生境雌雄样本的个体头胸甲长(BL)、头胸甲宽(BW)和体重(WW)之间都存在显著线性回归关系,其中头胸甲宽和体重之间的线性回归方程与预测值拟合程度最高。同时还发现各个生境个体、雌雄个体的头胸甲长、头胸甲宽、体重之间存在一定的差异。
Macrobenthic community is an important part of tidal flat ecosystem.Macrobentic community determines many significant ecological processes in the tidal flat wetland ecosystem. Studying on the macrobenthic community is important to improve our knowledge on the community ecology and the theory of ecology,and then it has affirmative significance to wetland resource exploitation and biodiversity conservation.
The dissertation based on the research on the macrobenthic community in the middle scale at the tidal flat wetland in the bridge construction zone at the South Bank of Hangzhou Bay,China, discussed on the structure characture,spatial distribution,seasonal variation,and seasonal dynamics of macrobenthic functional groups and trophic levels of the macrobenthic community. We also study on the population and the linear regression relationships of the dominant species Helice wuana in CiXi tidal flat in summer(July,2004).
Major conclusions from the research are:
1.From May 2006 to February 2007,the authors studied the macrobenthic community on the tidal flat near the Hangzhou Bay Sea-Crossing Bridge at the south bank.We found a total of 32 species,belonging to 18 families,7 classes and 6 phyla,most of them were arthropods and mollusks.Species' numbers were differ significantly among seasons(F_(3.6)=6.58,P＜0.05),and were distinct among tidal flats was(F_(2.6)=75.71,P＜0.01).The density and biomass of the upper, high,middle and low tidal flat were 97.00±13.13 ind/m~2,34.89±9.82 g/m~2;126.00±23.08 ind/m~2, 33.25±9.54 g/m~2;13.75±2.32 ind/m~2,2.76±0.53 g/m~2.Densities and biomass were not significantly affected by seasons(F_(3.6)=0.91 and F_(3.6)=4.27,P＞0.05),while differences were marked among tidal flats(F_(2.6)=10.48,P＜0.05 and F_(2.6)=10.94,P＜0.01).All the zoobenthic community's diversity indices referred to in this paper were significantly different between the tidal flats,while only Margalef's species richness indices and the Shannon-Wiener diversity coefficient showed a significant difference between seasons.Margalef's species richness indices, Shannon-Wiener diversity indices and Pielou's indices were as follows:high＞middle＞low, Simpson's indexes were:low＞middle＞high.Using the Hierarchical Cluster of between groups linkage method and the Nonmatric Multi-dimentional Scaling method,the 12 macrobenthic communities of high and middle tidal flat had no distinct dividing line,the macrobenthic communities of low tidal flat had a distinct dividing line frown high and middle tidal flat.The paper indicated that habitat differences were most important reason for differences in the macrobenthic communities composion.
2.A survey(May,2006 to February,2007)was carried out on the tidal flat near the Hangzhou Bay Sea-Crossing Bridge at the south bank,in order to assess the changes in habitat conditions of the tidal flat wetland resulting from differences in the zoobenthic community structure and function on different tidal flats and in different seasons.Macro-invertebrates were identified and counted.Based on the data collected from samplings near the bridge at the south bank of the Hangzhou Bay,we have categorized functional groups according to feeding types.32 species were identified,and assigned to 5 distinct functional groups(planktophagous, phytophagous,carnivorous,omnivorous and detritivorous)and 4 trophic levels.The results. showed that there was no significant difference between seasons for any of the diversity indices of functional group density,but a significant difference was found between the tidal fiats(except for the planktophagous group).The number of species in the carnivorous group showed no significant difference between tidal flats,while a significant difference was found between seasons,as opposed to the other functional groups.There was no significant difference between seasons for any of trophic levels density,but a significant difference was found between the tidal flats.The number of species placed in the carnivorous group showed a significant seasonal difference,while no significant difference between tidal flats,as opposed to the other functional groups which placed in the second and third trophic levels.This study suggests that basic zoobenthic community parameters were reflected in the composition and diversity of the functional groups.Obtaining species diversity information from the analysis of the composition and diversity of functional groups helps us to understand changes in the ecological relationships underlying complicated community changes.
3.A seven-days survey(11～17,July,2004)was carried out at the CiXi tidal flat of the south bank of Hangzhou Gulf to investigate the population characters of Helice wuana,which was one of the dominant species in CiXi tidal flat.The result showed there was a highly significant difference on population density and biomass among different habitats,The density of the crabs in the reclaimed area was 23.00±5.86 individuals/m~2,main road basement 10.72±2.32 individuals/ m~2,tidal flat 6.36±1.43 individuals/m~2,respectively,with the corresponding biomass being 172.27±43.89 g/m~2(wet weight),120.28±26.03 g/m~2(wet weight),61.88±13.91 g/m~2(wet weight). There was a significant liner regression relationship between body length and wet weight,between body width and wet weight,especially for the goodness of fit of the latter.The author also found that there existed substantial,distinction among these samples from different habitats,as well as the discovery of the differentiation about the body length,body width,wet weigh from one Helice wuana to another,and from male to female.
本文以浙江省宁波慈溪庵东镇杭州湾跨海大桥建设区域具有代表性的滩涂湿地(泥滩)为研究基地,在中等尺度上对滩涂湿地生态系统中的大型底栖动物群落进行了研究,探讨了杭州湾跨海大桥工程建设区域不同潮带大型底栖动物群落的结构特征及分布、功能群及营养等级的季节动态,同时也选取该地区的优势种群之一伍氏厚蟹,对比其在工程建设区域与自然滩涂生境中的种群特征及回归关系。
主要研究结果如下:
(一)2006年5月至2007年1月,在杭州湾南岸大桥建设区域潮间带按季节取样对大型底栖动物群落进行了研究。共发现大型底栖动物32种,隶属6门7纲l 8科,主要为软体动物、节肢动物和环节动物多毛类。物种获得数潮位间差异极显著(F_(2,6)=75.71,P＜0.01),季节间差异显著(F_(3,6)=6.58,P＜0.05)。高潮带、中潮带和低潮带的密度、生物量分别为:97.00±13.13 ind/m~2,34.89±9.82 g/m~2;126.00±23.08 ind/m~2,33.25±9.54 g/m~2;13.75±2.32 ind/m~2,2.76±0.53g/m~2。密度季节间差异不显著(F_(3,6)=0.91,P＞0.05),潮位差异显著(F_(2,6)=10.48,P＜0.05);生物量季节间差异不显著(F_(3,6)=4.27,P＞0.05),潮位差异极显著(F_(2,6)=10.94,P＜0.01)。各多样性指数在潮带间差异显著,季节间则只有Margalef种类丰度(S)和Shannon-Wiener指数(H′)存在显著性差异;Margalef物种丰富度指数、Shannon-weiner多样性指数和Pielou均匀度指数4季平均数表现为:高潮带＞中潮带＞低潮带;Simpson优势度指数表现为:低潮带＞中潮带＞高潮带。对4季3潮带12个群落进行聚类和排序分析可以看出,中高潮带界限不明显,低潮带和中高潮带的界线明显。分析表明:生境条件的不同是大型底栖群落组成差异的主要原因,同一站位大型底栖动物群落物种组成在各季节之间有显著差异。
(二)根据其食性类型将所采的大型底栖动物划分为5种功能群。用功能群方法对这些物种与生境变化的关系进行了分析,结果表明,各功能群密度在季节间均不存在显著性差异,而在潮带间除了浮游生物食者外,其它类群均存在显著性差异;肉食者的种类数在潮带间不存在显著性差异,而在季节间存在显著性差异,其它功能群刚好相反。滩涂大型底栖动物群落主要包括4个营养级别,各营养级的构成密度在季节间差异不显著,在潮带间则差异显著;各营养级种类数是处于第四级的肉食者季节间差异显著,潮带间变化不显著,处于第二、三营养等级的功能群则正好相反。底栖动物功能群多样性综合反映了杭州湾南岸跨海大桥建设区域潮间带大型底栖动物群落变化情况。
(三)2004年7月中旬对杭州湾南岸伍氏厚蟹进行了取样调查和统计分析,结果表明:不同生境的种群密度、生物量,个体之间存在极显著差异。伍氏厚蟹的种群密度分别为:围垦滩涂23.00±5.86只/m~2,主要道路基地10.72±2.32只/m~2,自然滩涂6.36±1.43只/m~2;生物量:围垦滩涂172.27±43.89 g/m~2,主要道路基地120.28±26.03g/m~2,自然滩涂61.88±13.91g/m~2。整体样本及各生境雌雄样本的个体头胸甲长(BL)、头胸甲宽(BW)和体重(WW)之间都存在显著线性回归关系,其中头胸甲宽和体重之间的线性回归方程与预测值拟合程度最高。同时还发现各个生境个体、雌雄个体的头胸甲长、头胸甲宽、体重之间存在一定的差异。
Macrobenthic community is an important part of tidal flat ecosystem.Macrobentic community determines many significant ecological processes in the tidal flat wetland ecosystem. Studying on the macrobenthic community is important to improve our knowledge on the community ecology and the theory of ecology,and then it has affirmative significance to wetland resource exploitation and biodiversity conservation.
The dissertation based on the research on the macrobenthic community in the middle scale at the tidal flat wetland in the bridge construction zone at the South Bank of Hangzhou Bay,China, discussed on the structure characture,spatial distribution,seasonal variation,and seasonal dynamics of macrobenthic functional groups and trophic levels of the macrobenthic community. We also study on the population and the linear regression relationships of the dominant species Helice wuana in CiXi tidal flat in summer(July,2004).
Major conclusions from the research are:
1.From May 2006 to February 2007,the authors studied the macrobenthic community on the tidal flat near the Hangzhou Bay Sea-Crossing Bridge at the south bank.We found a total of 32 species,belonging to 18 families,7 classes and 6 phyla,most of them were arthropods and mollusks.Species' numbers were differ significantly among seasons(F_(3.6)=6.58,P＜0.05),and were distinct among tidal flats was(F_(2.6)=75.71,P＜0.01).The density and biomass of the upper, high,middle and low tidal flat were 97.00±13.13 ind/m~2,34.89±9.82 g/m~2;126.00±23.08 ind/m~2, 33.25±9.54 g/m~2;13.75±2.32 ind/m~2,2.76±0.53 g/m~2.Densities and biomass were not significantly affected by seasons(F_(3.6)=0.91 and F_(3.6)=4.27,P＞0.05),while differences were marked among tidal flats(F_(2.6)=10.48,P＜0.05 and F_(2.6)=10.94,P＜0.01).All the zoobenthic community's diversity indices referred to in this paper were significantly different between the tidal flats,while only Margalef's species richness indices and the Shannon-Wiener diversity coefficient showed a significant difference between seasons.Margalef's species richness indices, Shannon-Wiener diversity indices and Pielou's indices were as follows:high＞middle＞low, Simpson's indexes were:low＞middle＞high.Using the Hierarchical Cluster of between groups linkage method and the Nonmatric Multi-dimentional Scaling method,the 12 macrobenthic communities of high and middle tidal flat had no distinct dividing line,the macrobenthic communities of low tidal flat had a distinct dividing line frown high and middle tidal flat.The paper indicated that habitat differences were most important reason for differences in the macrobenthic communities composion.
2.A survey(May,2006 to February,2007)was carried out on the tidal flat near the Hangzhou Bay Sea-Crossing Bridge at the south bank,in order to assess the changes in habitat conditions of the tidal flat wetland resulting from differences in the zoobenthic community structure and function on different tidal flats and in different seasons.Macro-invertebrates were identified and counted.Based on the data collected from samplings near the bridge at the south bank of the Hangzhou Bay,we have categorized functional groups according to feeding types.32 species were identified,and assigned to 5 distinct functional groups(planktophagous, phytophagous,carnivorous,omnivorous and detritivorous)and 4 trophic levels.The results. showed that there was no significant difference between seasons for any of the diversity indices of functional group density,but a significant difference was found between the tidal fiats(except for the planktophagous group).The number of species in the carnivorous group showed no significant difference between tidal flats,while a significant difference was found between seasons,as opposed to the other functional groups.There was no significant difference between seasons for any of trophic levels density,but a significant difference was found between the tidal flats.The number of species placed in the carnivorous group showed a significant seasonal difference,while no significant difference between tidal flats,as opposed to the other functional groups which placed in the second and third trophic levels.This study suggests that basic zoobenthic community parameters were reflected in the composition and diversity of the functional groups.Obtaining species diversity information from the analysis of the composition and diversity of functional groups helps us to understand changes in the ecological relationships underlying complicated community changes.
3.A seven-days survey(11～17,July,2004)was carried out at the CiXi tidal flat of the south bank of Hangzhou Gulf to investigate the population characters of Helice wuana,which was one of the dominant species in CiXi tidal flat.The result showed there was a highly significant difference on population density and biomass among different habitats,The density of the crabs in the reclaimed area was 23.00±5.86 individuals/m~2,main road basement 10.72±2.32 individuals/ m~2,tidal flat 6.36±1.43 individuals/m~2,respectively,with the corresponding biomass being 172.27±43.89 g/m~2(wet weight),120.28±26.03 g/m~2(wet weight),61.88±13.91 g/m~2(wet weight). There was a significant liner regression relationship between body length and wet weight,between body width and wet weight,especially for the goodness of fit of the latter.The author also found that there existed substantial,distinction among these samples from different habitats,as well as the discovery of the differentiation about the body length,body width,wet weigh from one Helice wuana to another,and from male to female.
引文
[1]陈放,马延祥。关于辽宁省海岸带、海涂开发战略的设想。见:张海峰主编.中国海洋经济研究[M].北京:海洋出版社,1982.88-101.
[2]中国地理学会海洋地理专业委员会.中国海洋地理[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.130-131.
[3]朱大奎.中国海涂资源的开发利用问题[J].地理科学,1986,6(1):34-40.
[4]陈永文,刘君德,李天任.中国国土资源及区域开发[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社.1989.163-165.
[5]《中国百科大词典》编委会.中国百科大词典[M].北京:华夏出版社,1990.920.
[6]杨宝国,王颖,朱大奎.中国的海洋海涂资源[J].自然资源学报,1997,2(4):307-316.
[7]《中国自然资源丛书》编撰委员会.中国自然资源丛书·海洋卷[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1995.245-246.
[8]彭建,王仰麟.我国沿海滩涂景观生态的初步研究[J].地理研究,2000,19(3):249-256.
[9]龚志军,谢平,阎云君.底栖动物次级生产力研究的理论与方法[J].湖泊科学,2001,13(1):79-88.
[10]叶属峰,纪焕红,曹恋,等.河口大型工程对长江河口底栖动物种类组成及生物量的影响研究[J].海洋通报,2004,13(4):32-37.
[11]袁兴中,陆健健.围垦对长江口南岸底栖动物群落结构及多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2001.21(10):1642-1647.
[12]Monbet,Y.Ame'nagement de grands ports.In:Dauvin,J.C.(Ed.),Les bioce'noses marines et littorales Atlantique,Manche et Mer du Nord,synthe'se,menaces et perspectives.Muse'um National d'Histoire Naturelle,Paris[J].Patrimoines Naturels,1997,(28):259-267.
[13]赵志模,郭依泉.群落生态学原理与方法[M].重庆:科学技术出版社重庆分社,1990.1-6.
[14]Molles M C.Ecology:Concepts and Applications(影印版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[15]孙儒泳.动物生态学原理(第二版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1992.
[16]马藏允,刘海,王惠卿,等.底栖生物群落结构变化多元变量统计分析[J].中国环境科学,1997,17(4):297-230.
[17]Hixon M A,Brostoff W N.Damselfish as keystone species in reverse:intermediate disturbance and diversity of reef algae[J].Science.1983,220:511-513.
[18]葛宝明,鲍毅新.灵昆岛潮间带大型底栖动物群落结构与生态位分析[J].生态学报,2005,25(11):3037-3043
[19]龚志军,谢平,阎云君.底栖动物次级生产力研究的理论与方法[[J].湖泊科学,2001,13(1):79-88.
[20]Alongi D M,Coastal Ecosystem Processes[M].Boca Raton:CRC Press,1997.419.
[21]Giblin A E,Foreman K F,Banta.Biogeochemical processes and marine benthic community structure:witch follows witch? In:Linking Species and Ecosystem[M].Jons C G,Lawton J H eds.New York:Chapman and Hall,1995.29-36.
[22]AI Bakri D,Behbehani M,Khuraibet A.Quantitative assessment of the intertidal environment of Kuwait Ⅰ:Integrated environment classification[J].Journal of Environmental Mannagement,1997,51:321-332.
[23]AI Bakri D,Behbehani M,Khuraibet A.Quantitative assessment of the intertidal environment of Kuwait Ⅱ:Controlling factors[J].Journal of Environmental Mannagement,1997,51:333-341.
[24]Armonies W,Reise K.Empty habitat in coastal sediments for populations of macrozoobenthos[J].Helgol.Mar.Res.,2003,56:279-287.
[25]Wiens J A.Spatial scaling in ecology[J].Functional Ecology,1989,3:385-397.
[26]Levin S A.The problem of parttern and scal in ecology[J].Ecology,1992,73:1943-1967.
[27]Forman R T,Godron M.Landscape Ecology[M].New York:Wiley&Sons,1986.
[28]Constable A J.Ecology of benthic macro-invertebrates in soft-sediment environments:A review of progress towards quantitative modles and predictions[J].Australian Journal of Ecology.1999,24:452-476.
[29]Day J W,Halt C A S,Kemp W M,et al.Estuarine Ecology[M].New York:Wiley Interscience,1989.339-376.
[30]Engle V D,Summer J K.Latitudinal gradients in benthic community composition in Western Atlantic estuaries[J].Journal of Biogeography,1999,26:1007-1023.
[31]Edgar G J,Shaw C,Watson G F,-Hammond L S.Comparisons of species richness,size-structure and production of benthos in vegetates and un-vegetates habitats in Western Port[J].Vict.J.EYp.Mar.boil.Ecol.,1994,160:201-216.
[32]Mannino A,Montagna P A.Small-scale spatial variation of macrobenthic community structure[J].Estuaries,1997,20(1):159-173.
[33]Webster P J,Rowden A A,Attrill M J.Effect of shoot density on the Macro-invertebrate community within a Zostera Marina sea-grass bed[J].Estuarine,coastal and Shelfscience,1998,47:351-357.
[34]Günther C P.Dispersal of intertidal invertebrates:a strategy to react to disturbances of different scale[J]? Neth.J.Sea Res.o 1992,30:.45-56.[35]吕宪国.湿地生态系统保护与管理[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
[36]Bertness M D.The ecology of a New England salt marsh[J].American Scientist,1992,80:260-268.
[37]Frid C,James R.The marine invertebrate fauna of a British coastal salt marsh[J].Holarctic Ecology,1989,12:9-5.
[38]Levins J M,Brewer J S,Bertness M S.Nutriens,competition and plant zonation in New England salt marsh[J]..Journal of Ecology,.1998,85:285-292.
[39]Lana P C,Guiss C.Influence of Spartina alterniflora on structure and temparal variability of macrobenthic associations in a tidal flat of Paranagua Bay(Southeastern Brazil)[J].Mar.Ecol.Prog.Ser.,1991,73:233-244.
[40]Wulff A K,Nilsson C,Carlson L,et al.Effect of sediment load on the microbenthic community of a shallow-water sandy sediment[J].Estuaries,1997,20:547-558.
[41]Deegan L A,Finn J T,Ayvazian S G,et al.Development and validation of an estuarine biotic integrity index[J].Estunaries,1997,20:601-617.
[42]Weisberg S B.An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity for Chesapeake Bay[J].Estuaries,1997,20:149-158.
[43]Dolah R F V,Hyland J L,Rosen A F,et al.A benthic index of biological integrity for assessing habitat quality in estuaries of the southeastern USA[J].Mar.Env.Res.,1999,48:269-283.
[44]余日清,陈桂珠,章金鸿,等.排放生活污水对红树林底栖动物群落季节变化的影响[J].中国环境科学,1997,17(6):497-500.
[45]鲍毅新,葛宝明,郑祥.温州湾天河滩涂大型底栖动物群落分布与季节变化[J].动物学报,2006,52(1):45-52.
[46]熊飞,李文朝,潘继征.抚仙湖底栖软体动物的物种组成与空间分布[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(1):122-125.
[47]韩洁,张志南,于子山.渤海中、南部大型底栖动物的群落结构[J].生态学报,2004,24(3):531-537.
[48]周晓,葛振鸣,施文彧,等.长江口九段沙湿地大型底栖动物群落结构的季节变化规律[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(11):2079-,2083.
[49]李宝泉,李新正,王洪法,等.长江口附近海域大型底栖动物群落特征[J].动物学报,2007,53(1):76-82.
[50]郑荣泉,张永普,李灿阳,等.乐清湾滩涂大型底栖动物群落结构的时空变化[J].动物学报,2007,53(2):390-398.
[51]San Vicente C,Sorbe J C.Spatio-temporal structure of the suprabenthic community from Creixell beach(western Mediterranean)[J].Acta Oecol.,1999,20:377-389.
[52]Mucha A P,Costa M H.Macrozoobenthic community structure in two Portuguese estuaries:Relationship with organic enrichment and nutrient gradients[J].Acta Oecol.,1999,20:363-376.
[53]Honkoop P J C,Pearson G B,Lavaleye M S S,et al.Spatial variation of the intertidal sediments and maerozoo-benthic assemblages along Eighty-mile Beach,North-western Australia[J].J.Sea Res.2006,55:278-291.
[54]Bonsdorff E.Zoobenthic diversity-gradients in the Baltic Sea:Continuous post-glacial succession in a stressed ecosystem[J].J.Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol.2006,330:383-391.
[55]Ysebaert T,Herman P M J,Meire P,et al.Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries:estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary,NW Europe[J].Estuar.Coast.Shelf Sci.,2003,57:335-355.
[56]Nanami A,Saito H,Akita T,et al..Spatial.distribution and assemblage structure of macrobenthic invertebrates in a brackish lake in relation to environmental variables[J].Estuar.Coast.Shelf Sci.,2005,63:167-176.
[57]Rakocinski C F,Brown S S,Gaston G R,et al..Species-abundance-biomass responses by estuarine maerobenthos to sediment chemical contamination[J].J.Aquat.Ecosys.Stress Recov.2000,7:201-214.
[58]Mucha A P,Vasconcelos M T S D,Bordalo A A.Vertical distribution of the macrobenthic community and its relationships to trace metals and natural sediment characteristics in the lower Douro estuary,Portugal[J].Estuar Coast.Shelf Sci.,2004,59:663-673.
[59]Dauvin J C,Thiébaut E,Gesteira J L G,et.al.Spatial structure ofa subtidal macrobenthic community in the Bay of Veys(western Bay of Seine,.English Channel)[J].J.Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol.2004,307:217-235.
[60]Steneck,R S,Watling L.Feeding capabilities and limitation of herbivorous molluscs:a functional group approach[J].Mar.Biol.,1982,68(3):299-319.
[61]Terborg J,Robinson S.Guilds and their utility in ecology.In:Kikkawa J,Anderson DJ ed. Community Ecology:Pattern and Processes[M].Melbourne:Blackwell Scientific Publications,1986,65-99.
[62]Jones J,Rowlatt S M,Ress H L,et al.Marine pollution monitoring group:Fifth report of the group coordinating sea disposal monitoring[J].Aquat.Environ.Monit.Rep.Direct.Fish.Res.Lowestoft,1993,39:1-42.
[63]Anderson A N.A classification of Australian ant communities,based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance[J].Journal of Biogeography,1995,22:15- 29.
[64]Tilman D,Knops J,Wedin D,Reich P,Ritchie M,Siemann E,1997.The influence of functional diversity and composition on coo-system processes[J].Science,277:1300-1302.
[65]Roth S,Wilson J G Functional analysis by trophic guilds of macrobenthic community structure in Dublin Bay,Ireland[J].J.Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol.,1998,222:195-217.
[66]Diana B,Luis Cancela da F,Carla Teles-Ferreira.Trophic structure of macrobenthic communities on the Portuguese coast.A.review of lagoonal,estuarine and rocky littoral habitats[J].Acta Oecologica,1999,20(4):407-415.
[67]Douglas J S,Mitsch W J.A model of macroinvertebrate trophic structure and oxygen demand in freshwater wetlands[J].Ecol.Model.2003,161:183-194.
[68]Wieking G,Krtncke I.Is benthic trophic structure affected by food quality? The Dogger Bank example[J].Mar.Biol.,2005,146:387-400.
[69]Thrush S F,Hewitt J E,Gibbs M,et al.Functional role of large organisms in intertidal communities:community effects and ecosystem function[J].Ecosystem,2006,9:1029-1040.
[70]刘瑞玉.我国海洋生态学研究三十年.见:中国海洋湖沼学会.第三次中国海洋湖沼科学会议论文集[C].北京:科学出版社,1983.303-313.
[71]厉红梅,蔡立哲,林丽珠,等.2001.深圳湾潮间带底栖动物群落结构的等级聚类与非度量多维标度排序[J].厦门大学学报,40(3):735-740.
[72]胡知渊,鲍毅新,葛宝明,等.围垦滩涂潮沟秋季大型底栖动物群落和生态位分析[J].动物学报,2006,52(4):800-809.
[73]李新正,于海燕.胶州湾大型底栖动物的物种多样性现状[J].生物多样性,2001,9(1):80-84.
[74]袁兴中,陆健健.长江口潮沟大型底栖动物群落的初步研究[J].动物学研究,2001,22(3):211-215.
[75]袁兴中,陆健健.长江口潮滩湿地大型底栖动物群落的生态学特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(5):414-420.
[76]袁兴中,陆健健,刘红.长江口底栖动物功能群分布格局及其变化[J].生态学报,2002,22(12):2054-2062.
[77]Yuan X.,Lu J J.Change of Benthic Macro-invertebrate Community in a Salt Marsh of the Chang jiang Estuary after a Short-term Tidal Restriction[J].International Journal of Ecology Environment Sciences.2001.27:105-110.
[78]袁兴中,陆健健.长江口岛屿湿地的底栖动物资源研究[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(1):37-41.
[79]朱晓君,陆健健.长江口九段沙潮间带底栖动物的功能群[J].动物学研究,2003,24(5):355-361.
[80]袁兴中,陆健健,刘红.长江口新生沙洲底栖动物群落组成及多样性特征[J]。海洋学报,2002,24(2):133-139.
[81]葛宝明,鲍毅新.郑祥.围垦滩涂不同生境冬季大型底栖动物群落结构[J].动物学研究,2005,26(1):47-54.
[82]葛宝明,鲍毅新,郑祥.灵昆岛围垦滩涂潮沟大型底栖动物群落生态学研究[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):446-453.
[83]鲍毅新,葛宝明,郑祥,等.温州湾灵昆岛东滩潮间带大型底栖动物群落的季节动态[J].水生生物学报,2007,31(3):437-444.
[84]葛宝明,郑祥,程宏毅,等.灵昆岛围垦滩涂潮沟大型底栖动物群落和物种生态位分析[J].水生生物学报,2007,31(5):675-681.
[85]尤仲杰,王一农,董任彭,等.浙江沿海泥螺.Bullacta exarate繁殖生物学初步观察[J].浙江水产学院学报,1993,12(4):23-32.
[86]尤仲杰,王一农,徐海军.泥螺Bullacta exarata(Philippi)生态的初步观察[J].浙江水产学院报,1994,13(4):245-250.
[87]顾晓英,尤仲杰,王一农.泥螺Bullacta exarata生长生物学的初步研究[J].浙江水产学院学报,1997,16(1):6-11.
[88]叶属峰,陆健健.长江口泥螺的种群特征及其生态学意义[J].长江流域资源与环境,2001,10(3):216-222.
[89]叶属峰,陆健健.长江口泥螺种群夏季的空间格局分析[J].动物学研究,.2001,22(2):131-136.
[90]於宏,王一农,徐丹.宁波三山滩涂珠带拟蟹守螺种群的年龄组成与生长[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2004,17(1):48-51.
[91]郑荣泉,张永普,王霆,等.乐清湾珠带拟蟹守螺夏季种群的分布格局[J].动物学研究,2007,42(1):134-139.
[92]郭艳霞,范代读,赵娟.潮坪层序的粒度特征与沉积相划分--以杭州湾庵东浅滩为例[J].海洋地质动态,2004,20(5):9-14.
[93]刘涛,艾晓东.杭州湾跨海大桥南岸栈桥设计及施工方案[J].石家庄铁道学院学报,2004,17(增刊):66-69.
[94]刘苍字,董永发.杭州湾的沉积结构与沉积环境分析[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1990,10(4):53-65.
[95]冯应俊,李炎,谢钦春,等.杭州湾地貌及沉积界面的活动性[J].海洋学报,1990,12(2):213-223.
[96]董永发.杭州湾底质的粒度特征和泥沙来源[J].上海地质,1991,(3):44-51.
[97]王美珍.杭州湾南岸滩涂环境状况及与贝类养殖的关系[J].农村生态环境,2005,21(4):33-37.
[98]胡方华.见证世界最长跨海大桥[J].工程现场,2004,(7):34-37。
[99]范代读,郭艳霞,李从先,等.杭州湾庵东浅滩潮坪层序粒度特征及应用[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(5):687-691.
[100]全国海岸带和海涂资源综合调查简明规程编写组.全国海岸带和海涂资源综合调查简明规程[M].北京:海洋出版社,1986.
[101]国家海洋局908专项办公室.海岛调查技术规程[M].北京:海洋出版社,2005.
[102]Fauchald K,Jurnars P A.The diet of worms:A study of Polychaete feeding guilds[J].Oceanogr.Mar.Biol.Ann.Rev.1979,17:193-284.
[103]童春富,陆健健.草坪无脊椎动物群落物种多样性及功能群研究[J],生物多样性, 2002,10(2):149-155.
[104]Diana B,Luis Cancela da F,Carla Teles-Ferreira.Trophic structure of macrobenthic communities on the Portuguese coast.A review of lagoonal,estuarine and rocky littoral habitats[J].Acta Oecologica,1999,20(4):407-415.
[105]张青田,胡桂坤,倪蕊,等.塘沽潮间带大型底栖动物营养结构的初步分析[J].海洋湖沼通报,2005,(3):73-78.
[106]厉红梅,孟海涛.深圳湾底栖动物群落结构时空变化环境影响因素分析[J].海洋环境科学,2004,23(1):37-40.
[107]张永普,应雪萍,高素阳,等.北麂列岛岩相潮间带无脊椎动物的群落结构[J].东海海洋,2001,29(4):21-27.
[108]李新正,李宝泉,王洪法,等.胶州湾潮间带大型底栖动物的群落生态[J].动物学报,2006,52(3):612-618.
[109]Ozolin'sh A V.Seasonal dynamics of soft bottom macrobenthic communities of the sublittoral in Peter the Great Bay,Sea of Japan[J];Russian Journal of Marine Biology,2002,28(4):235-243.
[110]韩海骞,熊绍隆,朱军政,等.杭州湾跨海大桥对钱塘江河口水流的影响[J].东海海洋,2002,20(4):57-63.
[111]French K,Robertson S,O'Donnel M A.Differences in invertebrate infaunal assemblages of constructed and natural tidal flats in New South Wales,Australia[J]:Estuarine,Coastal and Shelf Science,2004,61:173-!83..
[112]Warwick R M,Clarke K R.Comparing the severity of disturbance:a meta-analysis of marine macrobenthic community data[J].Mar.Ecol.Prog.Ser.,1993,92:221-231.
[113]Gray J S,Clarke K R,Warwick R M,et al.Detection of initial effects of pollution on marine benthos:an example from the Ekofisk and Eldfisk oilfields,North Sea[J].Mar.Ecol.Prog.Ser.,1990,66:285-299.
[114]Field J G,Clarke K R,Warwick R M.A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns[J].Mar.Ecol.Frog.Ser.,1982,8:37-52.
[115]丛建国.烟台潮间带底栖无脊椎动物群落和多样性研究[J].生态学报,1998,18(1):56-62.
[116]周时强,郭丰,吴荔生,等:福建海岛潮间带底栖生物群落生态的研究[J].海洋学报,2001,23(5):104-109.
[117]袁兴中.河口潮滩湿地底栖动物群落的生态学研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,上海,2001.
[118]李加林,杨晓平,童亿勤,等.互花米草入侵对潮滩生态系统服务功能的影响及其管理[J].海洋通报,2005,24(5):33-38.
[119]陈中义,付萃长,王海毅,等.互花米草入侵东滩盐沼对大型底栖无脊椎动物群落的影响[J].湿地科学,2005,3(1):1-7.
[120]Norkko A,Bonsdorff E.Population responses of coastal zoobenthos to stress induced by drifting algal mats[J].Mar.Ecol.Progr.Ser.,1996,140:141-150.
[121]宋宪国.用底栖动物评价水环境[J].山西水利科技,1997,(2):88-89.
[122]尤平,任辉.底栖动物及其在水质评价和监测上的应用[J].淮北煤炭师院学报,2001,22(4):44-48.
[123]张微,宋玉芳,孙铁珩,等.土壤线虫对环境污染的指示作用[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1973-1978
[124]戴爱云.中国海洋蟹类[M].北京:海洋出版社,1986.505.
[125]浙江动物志编辑委员会.浙动物志(甲壳动物)[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,1291:439-440
[126]鲁琳.厦门地区潮间带蟹类的种类组成与分布[J].台湾海峡,1996,6,15(2):163-169.
[127]金刚.蟹类生态学研究进展[J].深圳职业技术学院学报,2003,(1):28-34.
[128]李加林,童亿勤,许继琴,等.杭州湾南岸生态系统服务功能及其经济价值研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004,20(6):104-108.
[129]李春喜.生物统计学(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[130]李明云.普陀及宁波滩涂弧边招潮生物学特征研究[J].动物学杂志,.1996,31(6):32-35.
[2]中国地理学会海洋地理专业委员会.中国海洋地理[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.130-131.
[3]朱大奎.中国海涂资源的开发利用问题[J].地理科学,1986,6(1):34-40.
[4]陈永文,刘君德,李天任.中国国土资源及区域开发[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社.1989.163-165.
[5]《中国百科大词典》编委会.中国百科大词典[M].北京:华夏出版社,1990.920.
[6]杨宝国,王颖,朱大奎.中国的海洋海涂资源[J].自然资源学报,1997,2(4):307-316.
[7]《中国自然资源丛书》编撰委员会.中国自然资源丛书·海洋卷[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1995.245-246.
[8]彭建,王仰麟.我国沿海滩涂景观生态的初步研究[J].地理研究,2000,19(3):249-256.
[9]龚志军,谢平,阎云君.底栖动物次级生产力研究的理论与方法[J].湖泊科学,2001,13(1):79-88.
[10]叶属峰,纪焕红,曹恋,等.河口大型工程对长江河口底栖动物种类组成及生物量的影响研究[J].海洋通报,2004,13(4):32-37.
[11]袁兴中,陆健健.围垦对长江口南岸底栖动物群落结构及多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2001.21(10):1642-1647.
[12]Monbet,Y.Ame'nagement de grands ports.In:Dauvin,J.C.(Ed.),Les bioce'noses marines et littorales Atlantique,Manche et Mer du Nord,synthe'se,menaces et perspectives.Muse'um National d'Histoire Naturelle,Paris[J].Patrimoines Naturels,1997,(28):259-267.
[13]赵志模,郭依泉.群落生态学原理与方法[M].重庆:科学技术出版社重庆分社,1990.1-6.
[14]Molles M C.Ecology:Concepts and Applications(影印版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[15]孙儒泳.动物生态学原理(第二版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1992.
[16]马藏允,刘海,王惠卿,等.底栖生物群落结构变化多元变量统计分析[J].中国环境科学,1997,17(4):297-230.
[17]Hixon M A,Brostoff W N.Damselfish as keystone species in reverse:intermediate disturbance and diversity of reef algae[J].Science.1983,220:511-513.
[18]葛宝明,鲍毅新.灵昆岛潮间带大型底栖动物群落结构与生态位分析[J].生态学报,2005,25(11):3037-3043
[19]龚志军,谢平,阎云君.底栖动物次级生产力研究的理论与方法[[J].湖泊科学,2001,13(1):79-88.
[20]Alongi D M,Coastal Ecosystem Processes[M].Boca Raton:CRC Press,1997.419.
[21]Giblin A E,Foreman K F,Banta.Biogeochemical processes and marine benthic community structure:witch follows witch? In:Linking Species and Ecosystem[M].Jons C G,Lawton J H eds.New York:Chapman and Hall,1995.29-36.
[22]AI Bakri D,Behbehani M,Khuraibet A.Quantitative assessment of the intertidal environment of Kuwait Ⅰ:Integrated environment classification[J].Journal of Environmental Mannagement,1997,51:321-332.
[23]AI Bakri D,Behbehani M,Khuraibet A.Quantitative assessment of the intertidal environment of Kuwait Ⅱ:Controlling factors[J].Journal of Environmental Mannagement,1997,51:333-341.
[24]Armonies W,Reise K.Empty habitat in coastal sediments for populations of macrozoobenthos[J].Helgol.Mar.Res.,2003,56:279-287.
[25]Wiens J A.Spatial scaling in ecology[J].Functional Ecology,1989,3:385-397.
[26]Levin S A.The problem of parttern and scal in ecology[J].Ecology,1992,73:1943-1967.
[27]Forman R T,Godron M.Landscape Ecology[M].New York:Wiley&Sons,1986.
[28]Constable A J.Ecology of benthic macro-invertebrates in soft-sediment environments:A review of progress towards quantitative modles and predictions[J].Australian Journal of Ecology.1999,24:452-476.
[29]Day J W,Halt C A S,Kemp W M,et al.Estuarine Ecology[M].New York:Wiley Interscience,1989.339-376.
[30]Engle V D,Summer J K.Latitudinal gradients in benthic community composition in Western Atlantic estuaries[J].Journal of Biogeography,1999,26:1007-1023.
[31]Edgar G J,Shaw C,Watson G F,-Hammond L S.Comparisons of species richness,size-structure and production of benthos in vegetates and un-vegetates habitats in Western Port[J].Vict.J.EYp.Mar.boil.Ecol.,1994,160:201-216.
[32]Mannino A,Montagna P A.Small-scale spatial variation of macrobenthic community structure[J].Estuaries,1997,20(1):159-173.
[33]Webster P J,Rowden A A,Attrill M J.Effect of shoot density on the Macro-invertebrate community within a Zostera Marina sea-grass bed[J].Estuarine,coastal and Shelfscience,1998,47:351-357.
[34]Günther C P.Dispersal of intertidal invertebrates:a strategy to react to disturbances of different scale[J]? Neth.J.Sea Res.o 1992,30:.45-56.[35]吕宪国.湿地生态系统保护与管理[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
[36]Bertness M D.The ecology of a New England salt marsh[J].American Scientist,1992,80:260-268.
[37]Frid C,James R.The marine invertebrate fauna of a British coastal salt marsh[J].Holarctic Ecology,1989,12:9-5.
[38]Levins J M,Brewer J S,Bertness M S.Nutriens,competition and plant zonation in New England salt marsh[J]..Journal of Ecology,.1998,85:285-292.
[39]Lana P C,Guiss C.Influence of Spartina alterniflora on structure and temparal variability of macrobenthic associations in a tidal flat of Paranagua Bay(Southeastern Brazil)[J].Mar.Ecol.Prog.Ser.,1991,73:233-244.
[40]Wulff A K,Nilsson C,Carlson L,et al.Effect of sediment load on the microbenthic community of a shallow-water sandy sediment[J].Estuaries,1997,20:547-558.
[41]Deegan L A,Finn J T,Ayvazian S G,et al.Development and validation of an estuarine biotic integrity index[J].Estunaries,1997,20:601-617.
[42]Weisberg S B.An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity for Chesapeake Bay[J].Estuaries,1997,20:149-158.
[43]Dolah R F V,Hyland J L,Rosen A F,et al.A benthic index of biological integrity for assessing habitat quality in estuaries of the southeastern USA[J].Mar.Env.Res.,1999,48:269-283.
[44]余日清,陈桂珠,章金鸿,等.排放生活污水对红树林底栖动物群落季节变化的影响[J].中国环境科学,1997,17(6):497-500.
[45]鲍毅新,葛宝明,郑祥.温州湾天河滩涂大型底栖动物群落分布与季节变化[J].动物学报,2006,52(1):45-52.
[46]熊飞,李文朝,潘继征.抚仙湖底栖软体动物的物种组成与空间分布[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(1):122-125.
[47]韩洁,张志南,于子山.渤海中、南部大型底栖动物的群落结构[J].生态学报,2004,24(3):531-537.
[48]周晓,葛振鸣,施文彧,等.长江口九段沙湿地大型底栖动物群落结构的季节变化规律[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(11):2079-,2083.
[49]李宝泉,李新正,王洪法,等.长江口附近海域大型底栖动物群落特征[J].动物学报,2007,53(1):76-82.
[50]郑荣泉,张永普,李灿阳,等.乐清湾滩涂大型底栖动物群落结构的时空变化[J].动物学报,2007,53(2):390-398.
[51]San Vicente C,Sorbe J C.Spatio-temporal structure of the suprabenthic community from Creixell beach(western Mediterranean)[J].Acta Oecol.,1999,20:377-389.
[52]Mucha A P,Costa M H.Macrozoobenthic community structure in two Portuguese estuaries:Relationship with organic enrichment and nutrient gradients[J].Acta Oecol.,1999,20:363-376.
[53]Honkoop P J C,Pearson G B,Lavaleye M S S,et al.Spatial variation of the intertidal sediments and maerozoo-benthic assemblages along Eighty-mile Beach,North-western Australia[J].J.Sea Res.2006,55:278-291.
[54]Bonsdorff E.Zoobenthic diversity-gradients in the Baltic Sea:Continuous post-glacial succession in a stressed ecosystem[J].J.Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol.2006,330:383-391.
[55]Ysebaert T,Herman P M J,Meire P,et al.Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries:estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary,NW Europe[J].Estuar.Coast.Shelf Sci.,2003,57:335-355.
[56]Nanami A,Saito H,Akita T,et al..Spatial.distribution and assemblage structure of macrobenthic invertebrates in a brackish lake in relation to environmental variables[J].Estuar.Coast.Shelf Sci.,2005,63:167-176.
[57]Rakocinski C F,Brown S S,Gaston G R,et al..Species-abundance-biomass responses by estuarine maerobenthos to sediment chemical contamination[J].J.Aquat.Ecosys.Stress Recov.2000,7:201-214.
[58]Mucha A P,Vasconcelos M T S D,Bordalo A A.Vertical distribution of the macrobenthic community and its relationships to trace metals and natural sediment characteristics in the lower Douro estuary,Portugal[J].Estuar Coast.Shelf Sci.,2004,59:663-673.
[59]Dauvin J C,Thiébaut E,Gesteira J L G,et.al.Spatial structure ofa subtidal macrobenthic community in the Bay of Veys(western Bay of Seine,.English Channel)[J].J.Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol.2004,307:217-235.
[60]Steneck,R S,Watling L.Feeding capabilities and limitation of herbivorous molluscs:a functional group approach[J].Mar.Biol.,1982,68(3):299-319.
[61]Terborg J,Robinson S.Guilds and their utility in ecology.In:Kikkawa J,Anderson DJ ed. Community Ecology:Pattern and Processes[M].Melbourne:Blackwell Scientific Publications,1986,65-99.
[62]Jones J,Rowlatt S M,Ress H L,et al.Marine pollution monitoring group:Fifth report of the group coordinating sea disposal monitoring[J].Aquat.Environ.Monit.Rep.Direct.Fish.Res.Lowestoft,1993,39:1-42.
[63]Anderson A N.A classification of Australian ant communities,based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance[J].Journal of Biogeography,1995,22:15- 29.
[64]Tilman D,Knops J,Wedin D,Reich P,Ritchie M,Siemann E,1997.The influence of functional diversity and composition on coo-system processes[J].Science,277:1300-1302.
[65]Roth S,Wilson J G Functional analysis by trophic guilds of macrobenthic community structure in Dublin Bay,Ireland[J].J.Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol.,1998,222:195-217.
[66]Diana B,Luis Cancela da F,Carla Teles-Ferreira.Trophic structure of macrobenthic communities on the Portuguese coast.A.review of lagoonal,estuarine and rocky littoral habitats[J].Acta Oecologica,1999,20(4):407-415.
[67]Douglas J S,Mitsch W J.A model of macroinvertebrate trophic structure and oxygen demand in freshwater wetlands[J].Ecol.Model.2003,161:183-194.
[68]Wieking G,Krtncke I.Is benthic trophic structure affected by food quality? The Dogger Bank example[J].Mar.Biol.,2005,146:387-400.
[69]Thrush S F,Hewitt J E,Gibbs M,et al.Functional role of large organisms in intertidal communities:community effects and ecosystem function[J].Ecosystem,2006,9:1029-1040.
[70]刘瑞玉.我国海洋生态学研究三十年.见:中国海洋湖沼学会.第三次中国海洋湖沼科学会议论文集[C].北京:科学出版社,1983.303-313.
[71]厉红梅,蔡立哲,林丽珠,等.2001.深圳湾潮间带底栖动物群落结构的等级聚类与非度量多维标度排序[J].厦门大学学报,40(3):735-740.
[72]胡知渊,鲍毅新,葛宝明,等.围垦滩涂潮沟秋季大型底栖动物群落和生态位分析[J].动物学报,2006,52(4):800-809.
[73]李新正,于海燕.胶州湾大型底栖动物的物种多样性现状[J].生物多样性,2001,9(1):80-84.
[74]袁兴中,陆健健.长江口潮沟大型底栖动物群落的初步研究[J].动物学研究,2001,22(3):211-215.
[75]袁兴中,陆健健.长江口潮滩湿地大型底栖动物群落的生态学特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(5):414-420.
[76]袁兴中,陆健健,刘红.长江口底栖动物功能群分布格局及其变化[J].生态学报,2002,22(12):2054-2062.
[77]Yuan X.,Lu J J.Change of Benthic Macro-invertebrate Community in a Salt Marsh of the Chang jiang Estuary after a Short-term Tidal Restriction[J].International Journal of Ecology Environment Sciences.2001.27:105-110.
[78]袁兴中,陆健健.长江口岛屿湿地的底栖动物资源研究[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(1):37-41.
[79]朱晓君,陆健健.长江口九段沙潮间带底栖动物的功能群[J].动物学研究,2003,24(5):355-361.
[80]袁兴中,陆健健,刘红.长江口新生沙洲底栖动物群落组成及多样性特征[J]。海洋学报,2002,24(2):133-139.
[81]葛宝明,鲍毅新.郑祥.围垦滩涂不同生境冬季大型底栖动物群落结构[J].动物学研究,2005,26(1):47-54.
[82]葛宝明,鲍毅新,郑祥.灵昆岛围垦滩涂潮沟大型底栖动物群落生态学研究[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):446-453.
[83]鲍毅新,葛宝明,郑祥,等.温州湾灵昆岛东滩潮间带大型底栖动物群落的季节动态[J].水生生物学报,2007,31(3):437-444.
[84]葛宝明,郑祥,程宏毅,等.灵昆岛围垦滩涂潮沟大型底栖动物群落和物种生态位分析[J].水生生物学报,2007,31(5):675-681.
[85]尤仲杰,王一农,董任彭,等.浙江沿海泥螺.Bullacta exarate繁殖生物学初步观察[J].浙江水产学院学报,1993,12(4):23-32.
[86]尤仲杰,王一农,徐海军.泥螺Bullacta exarata(Philippi)生态的初步观察[J].浙江水产学院报,1994,13(4):245-250.
[87]顾晓英,尤仲杰,王一农.泥螺Bullacta exarata生长生物学的初步研究[J].浙江水产学院学报,1997,16(1):6-11.
[88]叶属峰,陆健健.长江口泥螺的种群特征及其生态学意义[J].长江流域资源与环境,2001,10(3):216-222.
[89]叶属峰,陆健健.长江口泥螺种群夏季的空间格局分析[J].动物学研究,.2001,22(2):131-136.
[90]於宏,王一农,徐丹.宁波三山滩涂珠带拟蟹守螺种群的年龄组成与生长[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2004,17(1):48-51.
[91]郑荣泉,张永普,王霆,等.乐清湾珠带拟蟹守螺夏季种群的分布格局[J].动物学研究,2007,42(1):134-139.
[92]郭艳霞,范代读,赵娟.潮坪层序的粒度特征与沉积相划分--以杭州湾庵东浅滩为例[J].海洋地质动态,2004,20(5):9-14.
[93]刘涛,艾晓东.杭州湾跨海大桥南岸栈桥设计及施工方案[J].石家庄铁道学院学报,2004,17(增刊):66-69.
[94]刘苍字,董永发.杭州湾的沉积结构与沉积环境分析[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1990,10(4):53-65.
[95]冯应俊,李炎,谢钦春,等.杭州湾地貌及沉积界面的活动性[J].海洋学报,1990,12(2):213-223.
[96]董永发.杭州湾底质的粒度特征和泥沙来源[J].上海地质,1991,(3):44-51.
[97]王美珍.杭州湾南岸滩涂环境状况及与贝类养殖的关系[J].农村生态环境,2005,21(4):33-37.
[98]胡方华.见证世界最长跨海大桥[J].工程现场,2004,(7):34-37。
[99]范代读,郭艳霞,李从先,等.杭州湾庵东浅滩潮坪层序粒度特征及应用[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(5):687-691.
[100]全国海岸带和海涂资源综合调查简明规程编写组.全国海岸带和海涂资源综合调查简明规程[M].北京:海洋出版社,1986.
[101]国家海洋局908专项办公室.海岛调查技术规程[M].北京:海洋出版社,2005.
[102]Fauchald K,Jurnars P A.The diet of worms:A study of Polychaete feeding guilds[J].Oceanogr.Mar.Biol.Ann.Rev.1979,17:193-284.
[103]童春富,陆健健.草坪无脊椎动物群落物种多样性及功能群研究[J],生物多样性, 2002,10(2):149-155.
[104]Diana B,Luis Cancela da F,Carla Teles-Ferreira.Trophic structure of macrobenthic communities on the Portuguese coast.A review of lagoonal,estuarine and rocky littoral habitats[J].Acta Oecologica,1999,20(4):407-415.
[105]张青田,胡桂坤,倪蕊,等.塘沽潮间带大型底栖动物营养结构的初步分析[J].海洋湖沼通报,2005,(3):73-78.
[106]厉红梅,孟海涛.深圳湾底栖动物群落结构时空变化环境影响因素分析[J].海洋环境科学,2004,23(1):37-40.
[107]张永普,应雪萍,高素阳,等.北麂列岛岩相潮间带无脊椎动物的群落结构[J].东海海洋,2001,29(4):21-27.
[108]李新正,李宝泉,王洪法,等.胶州湾潮间带大型底栖动物的群落生态[J].动物学报,2006,52(3):612-618.
[109]Ozolin'sh A V.Seasonal dynamics of soft bottom macrobenthic communities of the sublittoral in Peter the Great Bay,Sea of Japan[J];Russian Journal of Marine Biology,2002,28(4):235-243.
[110]韩海骞,熊绍隆,朱军政,等.杭州湾跨海大桥对钱塘江河口水流的影响[J].东海海洋,2002,20(4):57-63.
[111]French K,Robertson S,O'Donnel M A.Differences in invertebrate infaunal assemblages of constructed and natural tidal flats in New South Wales,Australia[J]:Estuarine,Coastal and Shelf Science,2004,61:173-!83..
[112]Warwick R M,Clarke K R.Comparing the severity of disturbance:a meta-analysis of marine macrobenthic community data[J].Mar.Ecol.Prog.Ser.,1993,92:221-231.
[113]Gray J S,Clarke K R,Warwick R M,et al.Detection of initial effects of pollution on marine benthos:an example from the Ekofisk and Eldfisk oilfields,North Sea[J].Mar.Ecol.Prog.Ser.,1990,66:285-299.
[114]Field J G,Clarke K R,Warwick R M.A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns[J].Mar.Ecol.Frog.Ser.,1982,8:37-52.
[115]丛建国.烟台潮间带底栖无脊椎动物群落和多样性研究[J].生态学报,1998,18(1):56-62.
[116]周时强,郭丰,吴荔生,等:福建海岛潮间带底栖生物群落生态的研究[J].海洋学报,2001,23(5):104-109.
[117]袁兴中.河口潮滩湿地底栖动物群落的生态学研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,上海,2001.
[118]李加林,杨晓平,童亿勤,等.互花米草入侵对潮滩生态系统服务功能的影响及其管理[J].海洋通报,2005,24(5):33-38.
[119]陈中义,付萃长,王海毅,等.互花米草入侵东滩盐沼对大型底栖无脊椎动物群落的影响[J].湿地科学,2005,3(1):1-7.
[120]Norkko A,Bonsdorff E.Population responses of coastal zoobenthos to stress induced by drifting algal mats[J].Mar.Ecol.Progr.Ser.,1996,140:141-150.
[121]宋宪国.用底栖动物评价水环境[J].山西水利科技,1997,(2):88-89.
[122]尤平,任辉.底栖动物及其在水质评价和监测上的应用[J].淮北煤炭师院学报,2001,22(4):44-48.
[123]张微,宋玉芳,孙铁珩,等.土壤线虫对环境污染的指示作用[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1973-1978
[124]戴爱云.中国海洋蟹类[M].北京:海洋出版社,1986.505.
[125]浙江动物志编辑委员会.浙动物志(甲壳动物)[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,1291:439-440
[126]鲁琳.厦门地区潮间带蟹类的种类组成与分布[J].台湾海峡,1996,6,15(2):163-169.
[127]金刚.蟹类生态学研究进展[J].深圳职业技术学院学报,2003,(1):28-34.
[128]李加林,童亿勤,许继琴,等.杭州湾南岸生态系统服务功能及其经济价值研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004,20(6):104-108.
[129]李春喜.生物统计学(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[130]李明云.普陀及宁波滩涂弧边招潮生物学特征研究[J].动物学杂志,.1996,31(6):32-35.