用户名: 密码: 验证码:
沉积物中污染物释放原位控制实验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
富营养化已成为影响地表水体水质最主要的环境问题。水体中过量的营养元素是引起富营养化的根本原因,其中磷和氮是重要的控制因素。一个主要的原因就是在适当条件下沉积物中的营养盐通过间隙水与上覆水体进行物理、化学和生物交换作用,将这些物质分解转化并向水体释放。因此控制沉积物中营养元素的释放成为湖泊(水库)科学研究的重点。
     本次实验以西安市近郊汤峪水库和扬州运河沉积物为研究对象,通过实验室静态模拟,分别研究了化学稳定剂控制水库水体底泥中营养盐的释放和填料原位覆盖+微生物固定化技术控制景观水体底泥中营养盐的释放效果。
     化学稳定结合扬水曝气控制沉积物污染物释放研究结果表明:
     (1)化学稳定剂结合扬水曝气可以有效的控制沉积物中磷酸盐的释放,从而降低上覆水中P043-的浓度。PAC的浓度越高抑制磷释放的效果越明显,抑制率的平均值分别为37.06%、41.36%、49.96%和63.16%。PAC和PAM联合使用的抑制效果较单独使用PAC的抑制效果好,抑制率的平均值可达88.38%。Ca(N03)2对于抑制磷酸盐的释放效果比较明显且持续时间较长,经过20天,抑制率达到95%.
     (2)化学稳定剂控制Fe2+的释放效果明显,Fe2+的释放与P043-的释放相关,随着PAC浓度的增大,平均抑制率分别为28.57%、49.52%、69.52%和89.49%。Ca(N03)2对于抑制Fe2+的释放作用效果最好,整个实验过程中6≠反应器中Fe2+的浓度始终低于0.13mg/L,PAC联合PAM抑制铁释放的效果优于单独使用PAC。
     (3)Ca(NO3)2在富氧的环境中促使底泥中的Mn向水体释放,在缺氧环境中抑制Mn向水体释放。
     (4)2#-5#反应器中NOM的平均抑制率分别为36.22%、25.02%、30.75%和34.09%.化学稳定剂抑制底泥中有机物的释放与水体中Zeta电位大小有一定的关系,Zeta电位越靠近中性,抑制效果越好。
     (5)沉积物中磷形态分析结果表明,化学稳定剂主要抑制了底泥中Fe/Al-P的释放,Ca-P相对比较稳定,不易释放。
     针对景观水体(扬州运河)底泥中氮磷高负荷污染控制问题,考察了不同溶解氧条件下硝酸钙原位处理、填料覆盖(沸石、方解石、沸石和方解石)+微生物固定化技术对底泥氮磷释放控制的作用。研究结果表明:
     (1)单独使用一种填料时,沸石控制底泥中氨氮释放的效果比其他几种填料好,对氨氮的去除率为84.3%。方解石对磷酸盐的去除率比其他几种填料高,可达87.9%。
     (2)对于氨氮浓度较高的景观水体,组合填料覆盖层可以有效的去除水体中的氨氮,未挂膜填料和挂膜填料对氨氮的去除率分别为79.98%和74.31%。
     (3)挂膜覆盖层促使底泥中的正磷向水体释放,与未挂膜的填料相比,更容易使底泥中的正磷释放出来。
Eutrophication has become important environment problemsthat draw our attention in the fields of water resources management. The basic reason of eutrophication is the excessive nutrients in water,in which the main controlling factors are nitrogen and phosphorus. The main reason is largely due to the release of nutrients from sediments into overlying water through physical, chemical and biological exchange.So it is necessary to do further study about controlling the inner pollution of sediment of the lakes (reservoirs).
     In this experiment, The sediments of Tangyu reservoir in Xi'an City and Yangzhou canal is the research object. Based on the laboratory static simulation of sediment-water interface environment,the effect of chemical stabilization inhibiting pollutions releasing from sediment,and the technology of filler in situ coverage+immobilized microorganisms removing pollution from water were studied. Chemical stabilization with Water-lifting Aerator controling sediments pollutants released results show that:
     (1) As shown in the data of experiment, it can be concluded that this new method can inhibit phosphorus releasing from sediment effectively. As to reactors (2#-5#), it can be concluded that the higher the PAC concentration was, the better the inhibiting efficiency was. And the PAM can strengthen the inhibiting efficiency of PAC, which was illustrated by the curve 5#. The mean E of 2#-6# for PO43- were 37.06.%,41.36%, 49.96% and 63.16% and 88.38% respectively. After 20 days incubation time, the E of reactor (6#) was kept constant at 95% or so, which was higher than that of others.
     (2) Chemical stabilization can inhibit Fe2+ releasing from sediment effectively,the researche on pollutants releasing from the sediments indicated that the Fe2+ released into the overlying water was positively correlated with phosphate concentration. As to Fe2+, the corresponding values of 2#-6# were 28.75%,49.52%,69.52%,89.49% and 82.88% respectively.
     (3) It can be concluded that at aerobic condition Ca(NO3)2 can accelerate Mn release from sediments and at anaerobic condition which opposited to that of in an anaerobic or anoxic condition
     (4) As2#-5#,all these agents were effective in inhibiting the release of NOM and the mean E value of them were 36.22%,25.02%,30.75%,34.09% and 39.53% respectively. The inhibiting efficiency PAC and PAM on NOM was positively correlated with Zeta potential.
     (5) Phosphorus form in sediment analysis results show:the PO43- released into overlying water was main from Fe/Al-P,while Ca-P was considerable stable.
     For high concentration nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in landscape water sediment(Yangzhou canal). Studying the condition of different oxygen, the technology of controlling nitrogen and phosphorus release by calcite in situ treatment, filler coverage (zeolite, calcite and compound capping with zeolite and calcite) biological filter media filler in situ coverage+biological filter media
     (1) The results showed that zeolite can inhibit ammonia releasing from sediment effectively. The mean E of zeolite for ammonia were84.3.%. For removal rate of phosphate, the calcite remove phosphorus effectively than other kinds of filler.The mean E of calcite for phosphate were 87.9%.
     (2) In the high concentration ammonia of landscape water, combined filler and biological filter media can remove ammonia from water effectively.the removal rate were 79.98% and 74.31% respectively. Filter and calcium nitrate can improve microbial activity and speed up the removal rate of ammonia.
     (3) Compared with filler, biological filter urge phosphate to release to surface water from sediments.
引文
[1]Karl DA.A sea of change:Biogeochemical variability in North Pacific subtropical gyre[J].Ecosystems,1992,2:181-214.
    [2]Berelson WM.The flux of particulate organic carbon into the ocean interior:a comparison of four U.S.JGOFS regional studies[J].Oceanography,2001,14(4):59-67.
    [3]Sondergard M. Jensen JP. et al. Internal phosphorous loading in shallow Danish lakes [J]. Hydrobiologia.1999,8 (6):145-152.
    [4]张立成,章申,董文江等.湘江江水中重金属转化的主要地球化学因素[J].环境科学学报,1986,6(4):395-402.
    [5]金相灿等.沉积物污染化学[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1992,309-312
    [6]Hosokawa YRemediation work for mercury contaminated bay-experiences of Minamata Bay project,Japan[J].Wat.Sci.Tech.,1993,28(8-9):339-348.
    [7]Blom G, Winkels HJ. Modeling sediment accumulation and dispersion of contaminants in lake Ijsselmeer(the Netherlands)[J].Wat Sci Tech,1998,37(6-7):17-24.
    [8]何孟常等.乐安江沉积物重金属污染及生态风险性评价[J].环境科学,1999,20(1)7~10.
    [9]杨小梦等.深圳市大沙河底泥毒物污染特征及对策探讨[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)2003,37(4):572~575.的沉积物.
    [10]李圭白,张杰.水质工程学[M]北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005,7.
    [11]Rutenberh.K.C.Development of a Sequential Extraction Method for Different Forms of Phosphorus in Marine Sediments[J].Limnol Oceanoga,1992,37(7):1460-1482.
    [12]Emil Rydin.Potentially Modile Phosphorus in Lake ERKEN Sediment[J].Water Research, 2000,36(3):2037-2048.
    [13]尹大强,覃秋荣,阎航.环境因子对五里湖沉积物磷释放的影响[J].湖泊科学,1994(3):25-28.
    [14]李建超.河流底泥冲刷悬浮对水质影响途径的实验研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(2):137-140.
    [15]范成新,杨龙云,张路.太湖底泥及其间隙水中氮磷垂直分布及相互关系分析[J].湖泊科学,2000,4(12):359-362
    [16]李文红,陈英旭,孙建平.不同溶解氧水平对控制底泥向上覆水体释放污染物的影响研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2003,22(2):170-173
    [17]范成新,秦伯强,孙越.梅梁湖和五里湖水——沉积物界面的物质交换[J].湖泊科学,1998,10(1):73-78.
    [18]洪祖喜,何品晶.受污染底泥易地处理处置技术[J].上海环境科学,2002,21(4):233-236.
    [19]洪祖喜,何品晶,邵立明.水体受污染底泥原地处理技术[J].环境保护,2002(10):15-17.
    [20]陈汉辉.应用水网藻净化水源水质[J].重庆环境科学,1998,3(2):19-21
    [21]MurphyT P, Lawson A. Review of emerging issues in sediment treatment [J]. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and management,1999,2:419-434
    [22]Jon Renholds. In-site treatmentofcontaminated sediments [R].USEPA,1998.27
    [23]何晶晶.受污染城市水体淤泥的清理与处置技术研究,中国城市建设与环境保护实际.北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997,181~184.
    [24]濮培民,王国祥等.底泥疏浚能控制湖泊富营养化吗?[J].湖泊科学,2000,12(3):269~279.
    [25]Holdren CW,Jones J.Managing Lakes and Reservoirs.3rd edition Prep.By N.Am.Lake Manage Soc And Terrene lnst,In coop with U.S.EPA.,2001.
    [26]Otis MJ."New Bedford Harbor,Massachusetts Dredging/disposal of PCB Contaminated sediments"Dredging 94-Proceeding of the second International Conference on Dredging og Dredged Material Placement,American Society of Civil Engineers,1994,1:579-587.
    [27]柳惠青.湖泊污染内源治理中的环保疏浚[J].水运工程,2000,(11):21~27.
    [28]莫孝翠,湖泊内源污染治理中的环保疏浚浅析[J].人民长江,2003,34(12):47~49.
    [29]Irvine K. N, Droppol. G, MurphyT. P,1997. Sediment resuspension and dissolved oxygen levels associated with ship traffic:implications for habitat renlediation.Water Poll.Res. [J]. Canada32(4):421-437.
    [30]汤承彬.草海底泥堆放对地下水的污染分析[J].1998,云南环境科学17(2):31~34.
    [31]MICHAELR PALERMO.A state ofthe overview ofcontaminated sedmi ent remediation in theUnitedStates[C]. Italy InternationalConferenceonRe-mediation ofContaminated Sedmi ents,, Venice,2001.
    [32]朱厂伟,陈英旭,田光明.水体沉积物的污染控制技术研究进展[J].农业环境保护,2002,21(4):378-380.
    [33]敖静.污染底泥释放控制技术的研究进展[J].环境保护科学,2004(6):30-35.
    [34]陈华林,陈英旭.污染底泥修复技术进展[J].农业环境保护,2002,21(2):179-182.
    [35]孙傅,曾思育,陈吉宁.富营养化湖泊底泥污染控制技术评估[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2003,4(8):61-64.
    [36]GERLINDEW,THOMASG,PETERC.P-mi mobilisation andphosphatase activities in lake sedmi ent following treatmentwith nitrate and iorn[J].Lmi nologica,2005,35:102-108.
    [37]Ripl w.Biochemical oxidation of polluted lake sediment with nitrate-A new restoration method [J].Ambio,1976,5:132~135.
    [38]张锡辉.水环境修复工程学原理与应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
    [39]孙傅,曾思育,陈吉宁.富营养化湖泊底泥污染控制技术评估[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,
    2003,4(8):61-64.
    [40]JACOBSPH,FDRSTNERU.Conceptofsubaqueous cappingofcontami-nated sedmi ents with active barriersy stems(ABS) using natural and modified zeolites[J]. WarRes, 1999,38(9):2083-2087.
    [41]Jon Renholds. In situ treatment of contaminated sediments.Technology status report prepared for the U.S.EPA Technology Innovation office.Washington,D.C.1998,7-9.
    [42]刘鸿亮,金相灿,荆一凤.湖泊底泥环境疏浚工程技术[J].中国工程科学,1999,1(1):81-84.
    [43]朱敏,王国祥,王建等.南京玄武湖清淤前后底泥主要污染指标的变化[J].南京师范大学学报(工程技术版),2004,4(2):66—69.
    [44]刘德启,李敏,朱成文等.模拟太湖底泥疏浚对氮磷营养物释放过程的影响研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2005,24(3):521-52.
    [45]王宁,张刚,王媛.湖泊内源污染的环保疏浚及其效果—以长春南湖清淤工程为例阴.环境科学研究,2004,17(2):34-37.
    [46]颜昌宙,范成新,杨建华等.湖泊底泥环保疏浚技术研究展望闭.环境污染与防治,2004,26(3):1 89—192.
    [47]李文红,陈英旭,孙建平.疏浚对影响底泥向上覆水体释放污染物的研究.农业环境科学学报.2003,22(4):446—45.
    [48]国家环境保护总局.《水和废水监测分析方法》(第四版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002
    [49]孙淑娟.海河沉积物中磷释放的模拟研究[J]环境科学研究,2008,21(4):126-131.
    [50]Gerlinde W.,Thomas G.,Peter C.,et al.P-immobilisation and Phosptaseha activities in lkaeSediment following treatment with nitrate and iorn[J].Limnologica,2005,35:102-108.
    [51]吴群河,曾学云,黄钥.溶解氧对河流底泥中三氮释放的影响[J].环境污染与防治,2005,27(1):21-24,52.
    [52]刘伟,畴楼,王军等.小城镇河流沉积物无机氮迁移循环研究[J]农业环境科学学报,2004,12(3):520—524
    [53]Jacobs P H,Forstner U. Concept of subaqueous capping of contaminated sediments with active barrier system (ABS) using natural and modified zeolite[J].Water Research,1999,33(3): 2083-2087.
    [54]Berg U, Neumann T, Donnert D, etal.Sediment capping in eutrophic lakes-efficiency of ndisturbed calcite barriers to immobilize phosphorus [J].Applied Geochemistry,2004,19: 1759-1771.
    [55]Barry T H,SimonR, Robert J, et al. Active barrier to reduce release from sediments: effectiveness of three forms of CaCO3[J]. Aust JC hem,2003,56:207-217.
    [56]蔡蕙兰,繁培仁,郑小明等.缙云沸石的开发应用,北京:地质出报社,1992,144
    [57]赵南霞,孙德智.用沸石去除饮用水中氨的研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报.33(3):385-389.
    [58]Plant L J, House W A. Precipitation of calcite in the presence of inorganic phosphate[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,2002,203:143-153.
    [59]Song Y H, Weidler P G, Berg U,et al. Calcite-seeded crystallization of calcium phosphate for phosphorus recovery [J]. Chemosphere,2006,63(2):236-243.
    [60]叶恒朋,陈繁忠,盛彦清等.覆盖法控制城市河涌底泥磷释放研究[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(2):262—26.7
    [61]温东辉,唐孝炎.天然斜发沸石对溶液中NH4+的物化作用机理[J].中国环境科学,2003,23(5):509—514.
    [62]LI Z.Use of surfactant-modi.ed ezolite as fertilizer carriesr to control nitrate release[J]. Microporous and MesoPorous Materials,2003,61:181-188.
    [63]刘静等,天然斜发沸石氨氮吸附性能及曝气再生研究[J],2009,(5):303-305
    [64]董浩平,姚琪.水体沉积物磷释放及控制[J].水资源保护,2004,20(6):20~23.
    [65]韩沙沙,温琰茂.富营养化水体沉积物中磷的释放及其影响因素[J].生态杂志,2004,23(2):98-101.
    [66]田钟荃.沸石去除饮用水源中有机污染物的展望[J].中国给水排水,1999,15(4):31-32.
    [67]林建伟.地表水体底泥氮磷污染原位控制技术及相关机理研究[D]
    [68]吴丰昌,万国江,蔡玉蓉.沉积物—水界面的生物地球化学作用[J].地球科学进展,1996,11(2):191-197
    [69]贾国东,彭平安.珠江口近百年来富营养化加剧的沉积记录[J].第四纪究.2002,22(2):158-165
    [70]Loveley D R.Phillips E J.Novel mode of microbial metabolism:Organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron and manganese[J].Appl Environ Microbiol Microbiol, 1988,54:1472-1480
    [71]周启星,朱荫湄.西湖底泥不同供养条件下有机质降解及C02与CH4释放速率的模拟研究.环境科学学报,1999,19(1):11-15

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700