用户名: 密码: 验证码:
中国劳动力供求变化研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文的主旨是研究中国劳动力供求的变化。中国劳动力的供求始终保持不平衡的态势,这种不平衡表现在我国在上个世纪末面临巨大“民工潮”的冲击,而近年来许多地区和行业却出现“民工荒”。因此,分析我国劳动力供求变化的趋势和原因,制定有效的政策措施,对于发挥现阶段劳动力资源的比较优势,提高劳动力资源的利用效率,促进经济快速发展具有重要的现实意义。
     本文从劳动力供求的总量变化、结构变化入手,着重分析了1978年以后我国劳动力供求结构变化的原因;接着从人口年龄结构变动入手,分析由于人口年龄结构变动所产生的经济效应、所带来的劳动力供求的变化;然后运用实证分析方法,从劳动力供给与需求两个角度出发,分析我国劳动力在劳动力参与率、劳动力供给时间以及就业方面所发生波动的趋势、原因;最后归纳出主要的结论与政策含义。
     我国自改革开放以来,劳动力供求总量发生了阶段性变化,劳动力供求结构性矛盾也在加大。本文通过对相关数据的分析发现:从产业上看,劳动力已经由以前集中的第一、二产业向第三产业转移,而且这种转移的趋势会逐步加强;从行业上看,劳动力目前正向制造业、交通运输仓储和邮电通信业、批发零售贸易和餐饮业上转移;从地区上看,劳动力目前主要集中于东部地区,特别是东南部地区成为劳动力转移的主要选择区域。
     在对影响劳动力供求的基本因素即人口年龄结构变动的分析中,本文重点讨论了由于人口年龄结构变动带来的劳动力供求的变动,这些变动虽然加大了劳动力供求矛盾,但是也为中国能否利用“人口红利”推动经济发展提供了重要机遇。随着人口老龄化进程的加快,劳动力人口比重下降,“人口红利”势必会逐步消失。因此,一方面中国要采取措施确保“人口红利”有效利用,另一方面,要在“人口红利”消失之前,制定新的发展战略,确保中国新的竞争优势。
     在对劳动力供给变化的具体分析上,本文从劳动力参与率与劳动力供给时间两个方面入手。通过实证分析发现,1978年以来我国劳动力参与率一直保持在较高的水平上,但是进入到上个世纪90年代之后,劳动力参与率开始下降。引起这种变化的主要原因是宏观经济形势、失业、教育状况以及劳动者生活水平的变化。
     近年来,随着工资的缓慢上升,我国劳动力供给时间呈不断上扬态势。不过我国劳动者收入水平仍然相对偏低,劳动力供给(时间)曲线尚未出现向后弯曲的态势。从长远来看,由于工资的变化、就业制度健全、劳动者自身生理因素与社会因素的影响,劳动力供给时间会逐步下降。
     1978年后,我国的就业弹性在不停地波动,但是就业人数呈缓慢上升态势。这种变化与工资变动、经济增长、技术进步、结构调整有着密切的联系。从长期来看,为了充分利用劳动力资源,在“人口红利”尚未消失之前,为促进我国经济快速增长,制定有效的政策措施就显得格外重要。
     本文试图在以下三点上有所创新:第一,从总量与结构两个方面来考察劳动力供求的变化。从现有的文献来看,许多学者在对劳动力供求的分析中,往往将总量矛盾与结构矛盾混为一谈,于是引发对目前中国劳动力是否处于“刘易斯拐点”的争议。因此对劳动力供求总量与供求结构的分别研究,对于把握我国劳动力供求的未来走势,针对劳动力供求出现的矛盾,特别是结构矛盾制定相关政策是很有必要的。第二,注重对人口年龄结构变动引发的劳动力供求变化的分析。由于以往关于劳动力供求分析往往从静态方面入手,这对全面研究劳动力供求变化带来了一定的局限,只有将劳动力供求的研究视角由以往关注的对人口增长、人口规模的变化转向对人口年龄结构变动的分析,才能深刻剖析人口年龄结构变动对劳动力供求以及经济发展的影响。第三,从劳动力参与率、劳动力供给时间、就业三个方面对劳动力供求变化进行了较深入的分析。
The main goal of the dissertation is to study the change of labor supply and demand (LSD) in China. China’s LSD keeps in an unbalanced situation all the time. This imbalance leads to being confronted with the enormous "farmers frenzied hunting for work in cities" in last century, and the labor shortage phenomenon in many areas and industries in recent years. Therefore, it is practically important to analyze the trends and causes of the LSD change in China. And the effective policies and measures are significant to improve the utilization ratio to human resources.
     The causes of the change of LSD in China since 1978 are studied from the total quantity and structure. Economic effects of population change are also analyzed through the factor that affects LSD. And the LSD change connected with population change is discussed as well. Through the empirical analysis method, the practical trend and cause of labor participation rate, the work time and employment are studied from both the labor supply and the labor demand. The corresponding policy suggestions are provided in the last chapter of the dissertation. And the main conclusions and policy meanings are presented meanwhile.
     Stage change happened since the reform and opening. However, the structure contradiction of LSD is enlarged at mean time. Through the analysis of relevant data the dissertation comes to conclusion as follow: the labor forces in the primary industry and the secondary industry have already shifted towards the tertiary industry, and the trend still continues; the labor forces are shifting towards construction, transportation, communication, retail trading and restaurant industry.; now the labor force is concentrated to the eastern regions, especially to the southeast headquarter areas where is apt to be the main destination of the labor force.
     The labor force population alteration brought by population change is mainly discussed following the analysis of essential elements that affect the labor force. On one hand, the changes of labor force population and population itself are increasing the contradiction of LSD; on the other hand, they also provide an important basis on which China can make use of population bonus to drive economic growth. However, with the accelerated trend of population aging, the rate of labor force population to total population is decreasing. So the population bonus will be definitely disappeared.
     Therefore, on one hand, it is necessary to adopt measures to ensure population bonus in China, on the other hand, new development strategy must be worked out to cultivate new competitive advantages before the population bonus disappears.
     When the labor supply change is studied, the labor force participation rate (LFPR) and the labor force supply time are taken into account in the dissertation. From 1978, the labor force participation rate in China is high, but the LFPR is decreasing nowadays. The empirical analysis on this trend reveals that the wage, macroeconomic situation, unemployment, education and living status are the important factors to affect the labor force participation rate.
     Recently, labor force supply time in China has been increasing. Through the analysis, it could be found that the backward trend has not appeared in the labor force supply curve, which means that labor income is still at a relatively low level. With the change of wage, the perfecting of employment institution, the influence of physiology and society, labor force supply time will be definitely decreasing in future.
     Employment fluctuation in China also changes all the time though the general trend is that the employment number rises slowly. This change is raised by the inherent cause that affects employment change including the change of wage, economic development, technology innovation and structure adjustment. It is also closely connected with employment cost. So from the long-run viewpoint, the corresponding policies and measures for fully utilizing human resources and population bonus must be worked out before the population bonus disappears.
     Three innovations are formed in this dissertation. Firstly, the changes of LSD are analyzed in both total quantity and structural way. So forth from available reference, when the LSD were analyzed, the contradiction of total quantity was always confused with contradiction of structure which raising the dispute that if China’s labor has been in the "Lewis inflexion ". So it is very significant to study the total quantity and structure of LSD respectively. It is very important to grasp the LSD change in the future. And it is essential to aim at the contradiction of LSD, especially the relevant policy for the structural contradiction. Secondly, main attention is paid to the analysis of the LSD change resulted from the change of population structure. In the past, when the labor force was studied, the supply and demand was always analyzed in a static state. Obviously there are many limitations in such kind of study on LSD change. The influence of population change on LSD and economical development could only be deeply investigated when the LSD research focus on population structure change rather than the population growth and population scale. Thirdly, in this dissertation, the LSD is analyzed on three aspects of the labor force participation rate, the supply time of labor force and employment.
引文
[1] Axel Borsch-Supan. Labor Market Effects of Population Aging. Labor, 2003, 17:5-44.
    [2] Andrew J.Oswald. The Effect of Social Security on Labor Supply: A Cohort Analysis of the Notch Generation. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 10, No. 4. (Oct., 1992):412-437.
    [3] Anne O.Krueger. The Implications of a Backward Bending Labor Curve. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.29, No.4 (0ct. 1962):327-328.
    [4] Abert Rees. An Overview of the Labor–Supply Results. The Journal of Human Resources, Vol.9, No.2 (Spring, 1974):158-180.
    [5] Albert Lauterbach. Employment, Unemployment and Underemployment: A Conceptual Re-examination. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol.36, No.3 (Jul., 1977):283-298.
    [6] Alvin K.Klevorick. A Note on a Keynesian Aggregate Employment Function. International Economic Review, Vol.7, No.2 (May, 1966):226-230.
    [7] David E.Bloom, Richard B.Freeman. The Effect of Rapid Population Growth on Labor and Employment in Developing Countries. Population and Development Review, Sep., 1986, Vol.12, No.3:381-414.
    [8] Daniel S. Hamermesh. A General Model of Dynamic Labor Demand. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.74, No.4 (Nov., 1992):733-737.
    [9] Daron Acemoglu. Beyond Becker: Training in Imperfect Labor Markets. NBER Working Paper, No.6740, September 1998, JEL No.J24, J31, J41:1-25.
    [10] David E. Bloom, David Canning, Pia N. Malaney. Population Dynamics and Economic Growth in Asia. Population and Development Review, Vol.26, Supplement: Population and Economic Change in East Asia. (2000):257-290.
    [11] David E.Bloom, David Canning, Jaypee Sevilla. Economic Growth and the Demographic Transition. NBER Working Paper, No.8685, DEC., 2001:1-63.
    [12] David Romer. Advanced Macroeconomics. Shanghai University of Finance & Economics Press, Second Edition, 2003:26-31.
    [13] Edward D.Kalachek, Fredric Q.Raines, Donald Larson. The Determination of Labor Supply: A Dynamic Model. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. Apr.1979, Vol.32, No.3:367-377.
    [14] Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro. Asymmetric Labor Supply. Empirical Economics, 2006.26: 183-197.
    [15] Edward M.Crenshaw, Ansari Z.Ameen, Matthew Christenson. Population Dynamics and Economic Development: Age-Specific Population Growth Rates and Economic Growth in Developing Countries, 1965 to 1990. American Sociological Review, Vol.62, No.6, Dec., 1997:974-984.
    [16] Fei, C.H, Ranis.G. "A Theory of Economic Development". American Economic Review, 1961. September: 114-129.
    [17] Feng Wang, Xuejin Zuo. Inside China’s Cities: Institutional Barriers and Opportunities for Urban Migrants. The American Economic Review, May, 1999. Vol.89, No.2: 276-280.
    [18] Fang Cai, Meiyan Wang. Challenge Facing China’s Economic Growth in Its Aging but not Affluent Era. China and World Economy, 2006, Vol.14, No.5:20-31.
    [19] Finegan. Estimating the Supply Curve of Working Hours. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, Vol.20, No.1 (Mar., 1962):74-80.
    [20] Golin Camerer. Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997.112(2): 104-116.
    [21] Gary S.Becker, Edward L.Glaeser. Population and Economic Growth. The American Economic Review, May, 1999, Vol.89, No.2:145-149.
    [22] Glen Cain. Married Women in the Labor Force. Chicago: University of a ChicagoPress, 1966:77-83.
    [23] George J.Borjas. The Relationship between Wages and Weekly Hours of Work: The Role of Division Bias. The Journal of Human Resources, Vol.15, No.3 (Summer, 1980):409-423.
    [24] Giuseppe Bertola ,Francine.D.Blau. Laboe Market Institutions and Demographic Employment Patterns, NBER Working Paper, July 2002, No.9043:1-36.
    [25] Henry S.Farber. Is Tomorrow Another Day? The Labor Supply of New York Cab Drivers. Journal of Political Economy, 2005.113(2):89-113.
    [26] Heinrich Hock, David N.Weil. The Dynamics of the Structure. Dependency and Consumption. The Journal of Political Economy, June 21, 2006:1-34.
    [27] James M.Holmes. The Keyness Aggregate Supply Function for Labor. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol.67, No.34, (Dec., 1972):797-802.
    [28] James J.Heckman. What Has Been Learned about Labor Supply in the Past Twenty Years? American Economic Review, May 1993:116-121.
    [29] Jinghai Zheng. A Comparative Study of Employment Adjustment in Chinese Enterprises(1986-1990)Economics of Planning 34, 2001:73-88.
    [30] Juan Betero. The Regulation of Labor. NBER Working Paper, June 2003, No.9756:1-10.
    [31] Lisa A.Cameron, J.Malcolm Dowling, Christopher Worswic. Education and Labor Market Participation of Women in Asia: Evidence form Five Countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol.49, No.3 (Apr., 2001):459-477.
    [32] M.S.Feldstein. Estimating the Supply Curve of Working Hours. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, Vol.20, No.1 (Mar., 1968):74-80.
    [33] N.A.Weston. Shorten Working Time and Unemployment. The American Economic Review, Vol.22, and No.1 (Mar., 1938):8-15.
    [34] Peter S.Barth. Unemployment and Labor Force Participation. Southern Economic Journal, Vol.34, No.3 (Jan.1968):375-382.
    [35] Rodrigo R.Soares. The Demographic Transition and the Sexual Division of Labor January 2007. NBER Working Paper No.12838:1-24.
    [36] Russell Cooper, Jonathan Willis. The Cost of Labor Adjustment: Inferences Form Gap. NBER Working Paper September 2003.No.10006:2-18.
    [37] Robert Shimer. The Impact of Young Workers on the Aggregate Labor Market. NBER Working Paper, August, 1999, No.7306:1-27.
    [38] Robin L.Lumsdaine.“Why Are Retirement Rates So High At Age 65?”Advances in the Economics of Aging, Chicago Press, 1996:123-137.
    [39] Richard S. Toikka, Charles C. Holt. Labor Force Participation and Earnings in a Demographic Model of the Labor Market. The American Economic Review.Vol. 66, No. 2.Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-Eighth. Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. (May, 1976):295-301.
    [40] Robert Shimer. The Impact of Young Workers on the Aggregate Labor Market. NBER Working Paper, August, 1999, No.7306:1-27.
    [41] Robert Whaples. The Shortening of the American Work Week, The Journal of Economic History, Vol.51, No.2 (Jun., 1991):454-457.
    [42] Ricardo T.Caballeroe et al. Aggregate Employment Dynamics: Building from Microeconomic Evidence. The American Review, Vol.87, No.1 (Mar., 1997):115-137.
    [43] Russell Cooper, Jonathan L.Willis. A Comment on the Economics of Labor Adjustment: Mind the Gap. The American Economic Review, Sep, 2004. Vol.94, No.4: 1223-1237.
    [44] Richard B.Freeman. Labor Markets and Institutions in Economic Development. The American Economic Review, May, 1993, Vol.83, No.2:403-408.
    [45] Sadoulet. Household Behavior with Imperfect Labor Markets. Industrial Relations, January 1998, Vol.37, No.1: 85-89.
    [46] Stuart O. Schweitzer, Ralph E. Smith. The Persistence of the Discouraged WorkerEffect. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.27, No.2. (Jan., 1974): 249-260.
    [47] Shelly Lundberg. The Added Worker Effect. Journal of Labor Economics, 1985, Vol.3, No.1: 11-37.
    [48] Shulamit Kahn, Kevin Lang. The Effect of Hours Constrains on Labor Supply Estimates. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.73, No.4 (Nov., 1991): 605-611.
    [49] Shelly Lundberg. Tied Wage-Hours Offers and the Endogeneity of Wage. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.67, No.3 (Aug., 1985):405-410.
    [50] Steven N S Cheung. The Contractual Nature of the Firm. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.XXVI (April, 1983):3-6.
    [51] Thomas J.Kniesner, Qi Li. Nonlinearity in Dynamic Adjustment: Semiparametric Estimation of Panel Labor Supply. Empirical Economics, 2002.27:131-148.
    [52] T.N.Carve. The Theory of the Shortened Working Week. The American Economic Review, Vol.26, No.3 (Sep., 1936):451-462.
    [53] T.Aldrich.Finegan. The Backward-Sloping Supply Curve. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.15, No.2 (Jan., 1962):230-234.
    [54] William G.Bowen, T.Aldrich Finegan. Educational Attainment and Labor Force Participation. The American Economic Review, Vol.56, No1/2(May. 1996):567-582.
    [55] Walter Y.Oi. Labor As a Quasi-fixed Factor. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.70, No.6 (Dec., 1962):538-555.
    [56] Yoram Barzel. The Determination of Daily Hours and Wages. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Nov.87, No.2 (May, 1978):220-238.
    [57]阿尔弗雷德·马歇尔.经济学原理(下).陈瑞华译.陕西人民出版社,2000:402.
    [58]包小忠.刘易斯模型与“民工荒”.经济学家, 2005.4:55-60.
    [59]程连升.中国反失业政策研究(1950-2000).北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002:119-120.
    [60]程红莉.我国产业结构与就业结构的偏离及对失业的影响.统计观察,2006.2:87-98.
    [61]陈晴晔.城市化视野的我国就业制度演进与创新.改革,2006.4:17-22.
    [62]蔡昉.劳动力短缺:我们是否应该未雨绸缪.中国人口科学,2005.6:11-18.
    [63]蔡昉,王美艳.中国城镇劳动参与率的变化及其政策含义.中国人口科学,2004.4:68-79.
    [64]蔡昉,都阳.“十一五”期间劳动力供求关系及相关政策.宏观经济研究,2005.6:21-23.
    [65]蔡昉,都阳,王美艳著.中国劳动力市场转型和发育.北京:商务印书馆,2005:53-54.
    [66]蔡昉.中国就业统计的一致性:事实和政策涵义.中国人口科学,2004.3:2-12.
    [67]蔡昉,都阳,高文书.就业弹性、自然失业和宏观经济政策.经济研究,2004.9,18-27.
    [68]蔡昉.论就业在社会经济发展政策中的优先地位.中国人口科学,2003.3:1-6.
    [69]蔡昉,百南生.中国转轨时期劳动力流动.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006:39-75.
    [70]蔡昉,王德文.人口转变的储蓄效应和增长效应.人口研究,2004.5:11-20.
    [71]蔡昉.认识中国劳动力市场及其变化趋势.比较,北京:中信出版社,2007,第30辑:1-14.
    [72]大卫·桑普斯福特,泽弗里斯·桑纳托斯著.劳动力市场经济学(第一版).王询译.北京:中国税务出版社,2005:6-37.
    [73]大源宽,森岗仁著.经济人口学.张真宁译.北京:中国科学出版社,1989:89-95.
    [74]付利.马尔萨斯.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2006:126-129.
    [75]费景汉和古斯塔夫·拉尼斯.劳动力剩余经济的发展.王月,甘杏娣,吴立范译.杨敬年校.北京:华夏出版社,1989年:31-33.
    [76]国家计委社会发展研究所课题组.“九五”中国劳动力供求与就业问题分析.南方经济,1999.9:18-20.
    [77]郭庆旺,贾俊雪.中国全要素生产率的估算:1979-2004.经济研究,2005.6:51-59.
    [78]葛培波,崔越.中国劳动力供求非均衡与促进就业的对策.山东财政学院学报,2002.5:68-72.
    [79]郭继强.劳动供求状态:基于向下倾斜劳动供给曲线的理论与经验.浙江大学博士学位论文.浙江大学图书馆,2005年.
    [80]龚玉泉,袁志刚.中国经济增长与就业增长的非一致性及其形成的机理.经济学动态,2002.10:35-40.
    [81]胡放之.我国二元劳动力市场与工资水平的决定.经济研究,2005.9:32-41.
    [82]胡景北.对经济发展过程中的工资上升运动的一种解释.经济研究, 1994.3:15-22.
    [83]胡行之.未来十年我国劳动力供求态势探悉.喀什师范学院学报,2003.3:17-21.
    [84]赫尔希曼.经济发展战略.北京:经济科学出版社,1991:42-58.
    [85]黄荣清.转型时期中国社会人口,辽宁:辽宁教育出版社:2004:202-203.
    [86]黄彬云.技术进步的就业效应研究综述.求实,2006.10:49-52.
    [87]黄赜琳.科技进步与就业波动变化的影响分析.统计研究,2006.6:34-39.
    [88]杰拉尔德·M.梅尔,詹姆斯·E.劳赫.经济发展的前沿问题.黄仁伟,吴雪明等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2004:245-246.
    [89]金剑.经济转型时期的中国劳动力参与问题.河北经贸大学学报,2006.1:18-23.
    [90] Judith Banister.中国制造业工资和劳动者报酬.中国劳动经济学.北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2006:Vol.3 No.2:42-44.
    [91]钱纳里.发展的格局:1950-1970.北京:中国财政经济出版社,1989:62-71.
    [92]钱纳里等.工业化与经济增长的比较分析.上海:上海三联书店,1989:89-94.
    [93]简新华,张建伟.从“民工潮”到“民工荒”-农村剩余劳动力有效转移的制度分析.人口研究,2005.3:49-56.
    [94]坎贝尔·G.麦克南,斯坦利·L.布鲁,大卫·A.麦克菲逊著.当代劳动经济学.刘文,赵成美,连海霞译.刘文较,北京:人民邮电出版社.2004:114-132.
    [95]库兹涅茨.现代经济增长.北京:北京经济学院出版社,1991:76-88.
    [96]刘铮.民工供给量的统计分析-兼论“民工荒”.中国农村经济, 2005.1:13-17.
    [97]林毅夫.发展战略与经济发展.北京:北京出版社,2004:118-120.
    [98]林毅夫.自生能力、经济发展与转型理论与实证.北京:北京出版社:2004:5-15.
    [99]李壑.边际成本:劳动力供给曲线的重新解释.浙江大学学报(人文社科版),1999.4:116-121.
    [100]李为永,周庄.我国养老保险制度面临的问题和对策.中南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2006.6:189-192.
    [101]李仲生.人口经济学.北京:清华大学出版社,2006:112-119.
    [102]李俊锋,王代敬,宋小军.经济增长与就业增长关系研究.中国软科学,2005.1:64-71.
    [103]理查德·B.弗里曼.劳动经济学.北京:商务印书馆,1987:18-89.
    [104]赖德建,熊婷燕.人口增长与经济发展的空间回归分析.统计观察,2006.12:72-73.
    [105]马克思.资本论(根据作者修订的法文版第一卷翻译).中共中央马恩列斯著作编译局翻译.北京:中国科学出版社,1983:397-487
    [106]彭维文.民工荒现象透析.数理统计与管理,2006.3:138-144.
    [107]孔泾源主编.中国劳动力市场发展与政策研究.北京:中国计划出版社,2006:240-247.
    [108]全国劳动力市场信息网监测中心.2001年用工需求情况报告.职业杂志,2001.5:39.
    [109]萨尔·D.霍夫曼.劳动力市场经济学.崔伟,张志强译.上海:上海三联出版社,1989:18-106.
    [110]史及伟.促进充分就业的目标及政策选择.浙江学刊,2007.3:200-203.
    [111]宋健.信息化为劳动力市场职业供求分析搭建高效平台.深圳信息职业技术学院学报,2004.6,第二卷.第一期:91-94.
    [112]汤兆云.我国现行人口政策的形成与稳定.江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2004.1:45-50.
    [113]谭友林.中国就业压力的空间格局与区域经济发展.人口研究,1999.11:48-56.
    [114]王德文.人口低生育率阶段德劳动力供求变化与中国经济增长.中国人口科学,2007.1:45-55.
    [115]王谦,郭震威.人口增长对经济增长的影响分析.人口研究,2001.1:20-23.
    [116]武剑.储蓄、投资和经济增长.经济研究,1999.11:13-24.
    [117]谢培秀.关于中国农村剩余劳动力数量估计.中国人口.资源与环境,2004.1:53-56.
    [118]杨河清主编,王守志副主编.劳动经济学.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:5-56.
    [119]杨宜勇.城市化创造就业机会与城市就业空间分析.管理世界,2000.2:121-129.
    [120]杨俊青.论工资的上升对劳动者的激励与就业.中国人口科学,2005.5:54-59.
    [121]姚先国,谭岚.家庭收入与中国城镇已婚妇女劳动参与率与决策分析.经济研究,2005.7:18-27.
    [122]原毅军,丁永健.城市发展可持续性评估指标体系研究.城市现代化指标体系探讨.北京:红旗出版社,2001:225-228.
    [123]周业安,章泉.劳动供给研究的新发展.教学与研究,2006.2: 55-61.
    [124]朱忠文.从“民工荒”看未来若干年农村劳动力的供求.统计研究,2006.2:17-21.
    [125]赵武,刘艳.“民工荒”现象的经济学分析.经济学家,2005.3:124-127.
    [126]章铮.民工供给量的统计分析-兼论“民工荒”.中国农村经济, 2005.1:25-28.
    [127]周博.中国劳动力需求弹性分析.经济与管理研究,2002.4:43-47.
    [128]《中国就业问题》课题组.1998-2007我国劳动年龄人口增长高峰.中国统计.3:2005:20-21.
    [129]周树平.劳动力无限供给与农民工短缺.人口经济,2006.4:15-17.
    [130]朱舟.人力资本投资的成本收益分析.上海:上海财经大学出版社,1999:193.
    [131]周清杰.低技能劳动力供给曲线研究.农业技术经济,2004.6:18-23.
    [132]张彦宁,陈兰通主编.2006中国企业劳动关系状况报告.北京:企业管理出版社,2006:28-29.
    [133]张培刚主编.发展经济学教程.北京:经济科学出版社,2001:657-673.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700