用户名: 密码: 验证码:
高层信息融合中可靠证据合成方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
高层信息融合(High-Level Information Fusion, HLIF)对应信息融合的高级阶段,其结果表现形式直观,应用方法灵活,较低层信息融合(Low-Level Information Fusion, LLIF)更能体现融合系统的能力。但是,HLIF的过程和信息更加复杂,不确定性问题更加严重,对信息融合方法的可靠性提出了更高的要求。证据理论具备良好的不确定性信息表达能力,可是相关研究对证据合成的可靠性关注较少,难以满足HLIF的高可靠度要求。所以,研究证据理论中的可靠证据合成问题,不仅可促进证据理论和HLIF的发展完善,而且对其在各领域的推广具有重要的理论意义和实用价值。
     论文依托某国防重点项目,面向一体化信息指控系统中的信息融合问题,针对信息融合中的证据理论方法,以提高证据合成结果可靠性为主线,重点研究了证据距离度量方法、证据冲突度量方法和冲突证据合成方法,具体内容如下:
     1.直接定义严格的证据距离度量非常困难,基于BPA概率转换的间接证据距离度量简单有效,针对其中的BPA概率转换问题,研究了一种基于不确定度加权的BPA概率转换方法。所提方法以Pignistic方法、PPT方法和DSmP方法为基础,选择认知程度作为转换过程保守或乐观的依据,实现了转换过程随BPA不确定度的自适应调整。选择非特异度作为所提方法中的不确定度权重得到了一种基于非特异度的BPA概率转换实例方法。针对实例方法中最特异BPA与转换概率在计算流程上的矛盾,提出了两者的“假设-校验”联合求解方法,实验结果验证了所提方法的合理性,可用于基于BPA概率转换的间接证据距离度量。
     2.针对基于BPA概率转换间接证据距离的度量精度问题,考虑概率转换前后两种形式下信息量的不一致会导致度量精度的下降,提出了信息守恒BPA概率转换方法。由于得到所建权重求解方程的解析解非常困难,在证明了解的存在唯一性和单调有界性的基础上,给出了转换概率数值解的快速迭代求解算法。利用BPA转换概率向量的2-范数距离与常用证据距离度量进行对比,结果表明所提间接距离度量方法能够合理有效的度量证据间距离。
     3.针对现有证据冲突度量无法体现不同证据间相互冲突程度差异的问题,研究了两种非对称证据冲突度量方法。所提方法建立在证据冲突的非对称关系分析和证据冲突度量的重新定义基础上,综合利用了证据焦元间的相交和包含信息。其中,第一种方法的计算过程简单,动态变换范围较小,第二种方法动态变化范围较大,计算过程相对复杂。与已有证据冲突度量方法的比较表明,所提方法可有效描述不同证据间相互冲突程度的差异,能够更加合理的度量证据间的冲突程度。
     4.提出了两种冲突证据折扣合成方法,解决了Dempster合成悖论问题。所提方法认为Dempster合成悖论的产生是因为Dempster规则处理证据的方式与人的认知过程不一致。借鉴人们日常生活中的信息处理方式,结合生物学研究中人们对不同证据的反应模型,在Shafer折扣方法的基础上,综合证据重要度和证据可靠度因素构成折扣因子,针对静态和动态两种不同的证据合成过程,分别提出了不同的重要度模型和折扣合成方法:证据分类折扣合成方法和证据复合折扣合成方法。实验结果表明,所提方法的证据合成过程与人的认知过程一致,能够解决Dempster合成悖论问题,提高了合成证据的可靠度。
High Level Information Fusion (HLIF) corresponds to the advanced stage of InformationFusion which displays more intuitive results and has flexible methods. HLIF can better reflectthe ability of fusing system than Low Level Information Fusion (LLIF). HLIF demands for morereliable information fusion methods because of the uncertainty due to more complex processingand information. Evidence theory has significant advantages in information representation.However, related research of evidence theory has paid little attention to the reliability ofevidence combination, which is preventing it from meeting the serious demand of reliability.Therefore, the research of reliable evidence combination is not only can promote thedevelopment of evidence theory and HLIF, but also has important theoretical significance andpractical value for their generalization in other application areas.
     Based on a key project of national defense, the thesis charges for the information fusionproblem of integrated information system, aims at the evidence theory of information fusionmethod, takes the improvement of reliability of evidence combination results as the mainline,mainly studies the evidence distance measurements, the evidence conflict measurements and theconflict evidence combination methods, specific content as follows:
     1. It is very difficult to define the rigorous evidence distance directly. However, the indirectevidence distance measurement based on BPA probability transformation is simple and useful.Therefore, a weighed BPA probability transformation method based on uncertainty for theindirect method is studied. The suggested method which takes Pignistic transformation, PPTmethod and DSmP method as the basis chooses cognitive degree as the indication ofconservation or optimism, and the transformation process can adjust adaptively. Takingspecificity as the uncertainty weight, we can get an example of BPA probability transformationmethod based on uncertainty. The “hypothesis and verification” method is proposed to get boththe most specific BPA and transformation probability for their contradiction in calculation flow.The test results indicate that the method is reasonable, and can be used in indirect evidencedistance measurement based on BPA probability transformation.
     2. Considering the accuracy of measure would descend if the information content isdisaccord before and after the probability transformation, a BPA probability transformationmethod is proposed for the measurement accuracy of evidence distance based on BPAprobability transformation. For the difficulty to get the analytical solution of the transcendentalequation, a fast solving algorithm of numerical solutions is proposed based on the certification ofthe existence and uniqueness of the equation’s solution, as well as its monotonic and boundedproperties. The comparison between the2-norm distance of probability vectors and the commonly used evidence distance measurement shows that our indirect evidence distancemeasurement is reasonable and effective in measuring evidence distances.
     3. Aiming at the problem that the existing methods can not reflect the difference ofconflicting degrees among each other, two asymmetric evidence conflict measures are proposed.The proposed methods are based on the asymmetric character consideration and redefinition ofevidence conflict, and make good use of intersect and inclusion information of focal elementsbetween evidences synthetically. The first measure concerns simple calculation and smalldynamic range, while the second measure entails more complex calculation and larger dynamicrange. Finally, the experimental compare with the existing evidence conflict measurementsindicate that our methods, which can present the variant degrees of conflict among variousevidences, are more reasonable in presenting conflict degrees among evidences.
     4. Two kinds of conflict evidence discounting combination are proposed which can solvethe Dempster's counterintuitive conclusions. The Dempster's rule produced inconsistent resultswith people's intuition, implying its processing of evidence differs from people's cognition. Thethesis proposes two evidence importance models and two evidence combination methods:classified discounting and composite discounting for the static and dynamic evidencecombination respectively. To achieve this, we use the information processing method in people'sdaily life, and people's reaction model to different evidences in biology research for referenceand construct the discount factor in Shafer's discounting method considering the evidenceimportance and evidence reliability. The test results indicate that our methods are consistent withpeople’s cognitive process, and can solve the Dempster's counterintuitive problems with morereliable combination results.
引文
[1]韩崇昭,朱洪艳,段战胜.多源信息融合[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2010.
    [2] E W, J L.Multisensor Data Fusion[M]. Boston: Artech House Radar Library,1990.
    [3] Karlsson A. Dependable and generic high-level information fusion-methods and algorithms foruncertainty management[J].2007.
    [4] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and Control,1965,8(3):338-353.
    [5] P Z. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data[M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers,1991.
    [6] D.L.Hall.Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion[M]. Norwood: Artech House,1992.
    [7] G S. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press,1976.
    [8] M L R. A discipline independent definition of information[J].Journal of the American Society forInformation Science,1997,48:254-269.
    [9] Bloch I, Hunter A, Appriou A, et al. Fusion: General concepts and characteristics[J]. InternationalJournal of Intelligent Systems,2001,16:1107–1134.
    [10] Moskal M, Sudit M,Sambhoos K. The role of information fusion in providing analytical rigor forintelligence analysis[A], Proceedings of the14thInternational Conference on Information Fusion(FUSION)[C],2011:1-6.
    [11]简小刚,贾鸿盛,石来德.多传感器信息融合技术的研究进展[J].中国工程机械学报,2009,7(2):227-232.
    [12] Bosse E, Guitouni A, Valin P. An essay to characterise information fusion systems[A], The9thInternational Conference on Information fusion[C],2006.
    [13] White F E. Data Fusion Lexicon[M]. San Diego: Joint Directors of Laboratories, Technical Panel for C3,Data Fusion Sub-Panel, Naval Ocean Systems Center,1991.
    [14] J M, D.-W.H.DATA FUSION AND SENSOR MANAGEMENT: A Decentralized informationTheoretic Approach[M]. Ellis Horwood Linited,1994.
    [15] Bostr m H, Andler S F, Brohede M, et al. On the Definition of Information Fusion as a Field ofResearch[R], Informatics Research Centre, University of Sk vde,2007.
    [16] Sidek O, Quadri S A. A review of data fusion models and systems[J]. International Journal of Image andData Fusion.2012,3(1):3-21.
    [17] Boyd J. A discourse on winning and losing. Unpublished set of briefng slides, Air University Library,Maxwell AFB, AL, USA, May1987.
    [18] Esteban J, Starr A, Willetts R, et al. A review of data fusion models and architectures towardsengineering guidelines[J]. Neural computing and applications,2004,14(4):273-281.
    [19] Bedworth M, Brien J O. The Omnibus Model: A New Model of Data Fusion[A], The2ndInternationalconference on information fusion[C],1999.
    [20] Steinberg A N, Bowman C L, White F E. Revisions to the JDL data fusion model[A], Proc. of the SPIEConference on Sensor Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications III[C],1999:430-441.
    [21] Hall D, McMullen S. Mathematical techniques in multi-sensor data fusion (2ndedition)[M]. Norwood:Artech house,2004.
    [22]何友,王国宏,关欣.信息融合理论及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2010.
    [23]王洪锋,周磊,单甘霖.国外军事信息融合理论与应用的研究进展[J].电光与控制,2007,14(4):13-18.
    [24] Hall D L, Llinas J. Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion[M]. CRC Press,2001.
    [25] Bosse E, Roy J, Wark S. Concepts, Models, and Tools for Information Fusion[M]. Artech House,2007.
    [26] Blasch E, Bosse E, Lambert D A. High-Level Information Fusion Management and Systems Design[M].Artech House,2012.
    [27]龙永锡.多目标跟踪方法[J].指挥与控制,1980,1:6-10.
    [28]董志荣.多目标密集环境下航迹处理问题及集合论描述法[J].火控技术,1981,1:1-12.
    [29]何友.多目标多传感器综合算法研究[D],武汉:海军工程大学,1988.
    [30]刘少辉,王振宇.一个基于黑板模型的多传感器信息融合专家系统[J].计算机杂志,1989,4:9-18.
    [31]何友,王国宏.多传感器信息融合及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2007.
    [32]杨万海.多传感器数据融合及其应用[M].西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,2004.
    [33]聂伟,王祁,孙圣和.多传感器检测系统中的多元假设数据融合方法[J].电子科学学刊,1999,1:78-81.
    [34]刘盼芝,韩崇昭.分布式自动删除平均恒虚警率检测技术[J].自动化学报,2009,35(7):903-910.
    [35]付梦印,赵诚.基于二代Curvelet变换的红外与可见光图像融合[J].红外与毫米波学报,2009,28(4):254-258.
    [36]刘贵喜,杨万海.基于小波分解的图像融合方法及性能评价[J].自动化学报,2002,28(6):927-934.
    [37]王晓帆.信息融合中的态势评估技术研究[D],西安:西安电子科技大学,2012.
    [38]李闯,端木京顺,雷英杰,等.基于认知图和直觉模糊推理的态势评估方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2012,34(10):2064-2068.
    [39]张华睿,杨宏文,胡卫东,等.基于Fisher信息距离的传感器管理方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2012,34(8):1587-1591.
    [40]崔博鑫,许蕴山,夏海宝,等.基于任务控制的动态多传感器管理方案[J].系统工程与电子技术,2012,34(12):2473-2478.
    [41]罗志勇,何佳洲.信息融合国际研究动向--第10届国际信息融合会议快报[J].指挥控制与仿真,2007,29(5):121-122.
    [42] Sheridan F K J. Asurvey of techniques for inference under uncertainty[J]. Artifcial Intelligence Review,1991,5:89-119.
    [43] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1978,1(1):3-28.
    [44] Florea M C, Jousselme A-L, Bosse E. Fusion of Imperfect Information in the Unified Framework ofRandom Sets Theory: Application to Target Identification[R], DTIC Document,2007.
    [45] Julier S J, Uhlmann J K. A non-divergent estimation algorithm in the presence of unknowncorrelations[A], Proceedings of the1997American Control Conference [C], IEEE,1997:2369-2373.
    [46] Makarenko A, Brooks A, Kaupp T, et al. Decentralised data fusion: A graphical model approach[A],12thInternational Conference onInformation Fusion[C], IEEE,2009:545-554.
    [47] Maybeck P S, Stochastic models. estimation and control[M]. Academic Press,1982.
    [48] Khaleghi B, Khamis A, Karray F O, et al. multisensor data fusion: A review of the state-of-the-art[J].Information Fusion,2013,14(1):28-44.
    [49] Wellington S, Atkinson J, Sion R. Sensor validation and fusion using the Nadaraya-Watson statisticalestimator[A], Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion [C], IEEE,2002:321-326.
    [50] Frolik J, Abdelrahman M, Kandasamy P. A confidence-based approach to the self-validation, fusion andreconstruction of quasi-redundant sensor data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation andMeasurement,2001,50(6):1761-1769.
    [51] Uhlmann J K. Covariance consistency methods for fault-tolerant distributed data fusion[J]. InformationFusion,2003,4(3):201-215.
    [52] Maskell S. A Bayesian approach to fusing uncertain, imprecise and conflicting information[J].Information Fusion,2008,9(2):259-277.
    [53]杨风暴,王肖霞.D-S证据理论的冲突证据合成方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2010.
    [54] Llinas J, Liggins M E, Hall D L. Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion: Theory and Practice[M]. CRC Press,2008.
    [55] Destercke S, Dubois D. Idempotent conjunctive combination of belief functions: Extending the minimumrule of possibility theory[J]. Information Sciences,2011,181(18):3925-3945.
    [56] Cattaneo M E. Belief functions combination without the assumption of independence of the informationsources[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2011,52(3):299-315.
    [57]潘泉,王增福,梁彦,等.信息融合理论的基本方法与进展[J].控制理论与应用,2012,29(10):1233-1244.
    [58] Hinman M L. Some computational approaches for situation assessment and impact assessment[A],Proceedings of the5th International Conference on Information fusion[C],2002.
    [59] Blasch E, Bossé E, Lambert D A. High-Level Information Fusion Management and Systems Design[M]:Artech House,2012.
    [60] Noble D F. Schema-based knowledge elicitation for planning and situation assessment aids[J]. IEEETransactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,1989,19(3):473-482.
    [61] Azarewicz J, Fala G, Heithecker C. Template-based multi-agent plan recognition for tactical situationassessment[A],1989, the5thConference on Artificial Intelligence Applications[C], IEEE,1989:247-254.
    [62] Zhang W, Hill Jr R W. A template-based and pattern-driven approach to situation awareness andassessment in virtual humans[A], Proceedings of the4thinternational conference on Autonomousagents[C], ACM,2000:116-123.
    [63] Hanson M L, Sullivan O, Harper K A. On-line situation assessment for unmanned air vehicles[A],Proceedings of the Florida Artificial Intelligence and Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference, KeyWest Florida[C],2001:48.
    [64] Blackrnan S, House A. Design and analysis of modern tracking systems[J]. Boston, MA: Artech House,1999.
    [65] Blasch E P, Huang S H. Multilevel Feature-based fuzzy fusion for target recognition[A], InternationalSociety for Optics and Photonics in AeroSense[C],2000:279-288.
    [66] Blasch E P. Modeling intent for a target tracking and identification scenario[A], International Societyfor Optics and Photonics in:Defense and Security[C],2004:260-269.
    [67] Kreucher C, Blatt D, Hero A, et al. Adaptive multi-modality sensor scheduling for detection andtracking of smart targets[J]. Digital Signal Processing,2006,16(5):546-567.
    [68] Laudy C, Ganascia J G, Sedogbo C. High-level fusion based on conceptual graphs[A],200710thInternational Conference on Information Fusion[C],2007:1-8.
    [69] Costa P C G, Kuo-Chu C, Laskey K B, et al. A multi-disciplinary approach to high level fusion inpredictive situational awareness[A], The12thInternational Conference on Information Fusion[C],2009:248-255.
    [70] Kadar I, Chong C, Ruget G, et al. Fusion, Vision and Challenges[A], International Conference onInformation Fusion[C],2000.
    [71] Blasch E, Hinman M, Llinas J, et al. Data Fusion for Levels2,3, and4[A], International Conference onInformation Fusion[C],2001.
    [72] Blasch E, Kadar I, Salerno J, et al. Issues and Challenges in Situation Assessment (Level2Fusion)[J].Journal of Advances in Information Fusion,2006,1(2):122-139.
    [73] Das S, Llinas J, Pavlin G, et al. Agent Based Information Fusion[A], International Conference onInformation Fusion[C],2007.
    [74] E B e. Resource Management and Its Interactions with Level2/3Fusion: Panel Discussion[A],International Conference on Information Fusion[C],2007.
    [75] Blasch E, Kadar I, Hintz K, et al. Resource Management Coordination with Level2/3Fusion Issues andChallenges[J]. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine,2008,23(3):32-46.
    [76] Kadar I, Svensson P. Challenges in higher level fusion: unsolved, difficult, and misunderstoodproblems/approaches in levels2-4fusion research[A], International Conference on InformationFusion[C],2004.
    [77] Toth G, Kokar M M, Wallenius K, et al. Higher-level Information Fusion: Challenges to the AcademicCommunity[A], International Conference on Information Fusion[C],2008.
    [78] Costa P C G, Chang K-C, Laskey K, et al. High-level fusion: Issues in developing a formal theory[A],International Conference on Information Fusion[C],2010.
    [79] Blasch E, Valin P, Jousselme A-L, et al. Top ten trends in High-Level Information Fusion[A],International Conference on Information Fusion[C],2012.
    [80] Kruger K, Schade U, Ziegler J. Uncertainty in the fusion of information from multiple diverse sourcesfor situation awareness[A], The11thInternational Conference on Information Fusion[C], Cologne,2008:1-8.
    [81] WL O, al. e. Challenge problems:uncertainty in system response given uncertain parameters[J].Reliability Engineering&System Safety,2004,85(1-3):11-19.
    [82] Lee H, Lee B, Park K, et al. Fusion techniques for reliable information: A survey[J].InternationalJournal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications,2010,4(2):74-88.
    [83] P S. Data fusion in the transferable belief model[A], Proceedings of the3rdInternational Conference onInformation Fusion[C], France,2000, PS21-PS33.
    [84] R.A., R.H.Campbell. An infrastructure for context awareness based on first order logic[J]. Personal andUbiquitous Computing,2003,7:353-364.
    [85]岳昆,刘惟一,朱运磊,等.一种基于概率图模型的不确定性数据世系表示方法[J].计算机学报,2011,34(10):1897-1906.
    [86] Bernardo J M, Smith A F M. Bayesian Theory[M]. John Wiley andsons,2000.
    [87] Gelman A, Carlin J B, Stern H S, et al. Bayesian Data Analysis[M]. Chapman&Hall,2004.
    [88] Klaus-Dieter S, Olaf K, Fernando Puente L, et al. A Bayesian Approach to Information Fusion forEvaluating the Measurement Uncertainty[A],2006IEEE International Conference on MultisensorFusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems[C],2006:507-511.
    [89]柴慧敏,王宝树.态势评估中的贝叶斯网络模型研究[J].西安电子科技大学学报(自然科学版),2009,36(3):491-495.
    [90] Schubert R, Wanielik G. A Unified Bayesian Approach for Object and Situation Assessment[J].Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, IEEE,2011,3(2):6-19.
    [91] Di Giorgio A, Liberati F. Interdependency modeling and analysis of critical infrastructures based onDynamic Bayesian Networks[A],201119th Mediterranean Conference on Control&Automation(MED)[C],2011:791-797.
    [92] Bladon P, Hall R J, Wright W A. Situation assessment using graphical models[A], Proceedings of the5th International Conference on Information fusion[C],2002.
    [93] Johansson F, Falkman G. Implementation and integration of a Bayesian network for prediction oftactical intention into a ground target simulator[A], Proceedings of the9th International Conference onInformation fusion[C].2006.
    [94] Mirmoeini F, Krishnamurthy V. An adaptive situation assessment based decision making system[A],Proceedings of the9th International Conference on Information fusion[C],2006.
    [95] Pavlin G, Nunnink J. Inference meta models: Towards robust information fusion with Bayesiannetworks[A], Proceedings of the9th International Conference on Information fusion[C],2006.
    [96] Okello N, Thoms G. Threat assessment using Bayesian networks[A], Proceedings of the6thInternational Conference on Information fusion[C],2003.
    [97] Cozman F G. Graphical models for imprecise probabilities[J]. International Journal of ApproximateReasoning,2005,39:167-184.
    [98] Coupe V M, Gaag L C v. Properties of sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks[J]. Annals ofMathematics andArtifcial Intelligence,2002,36:323-356.
    [99] Th ne H, Güntzer U, Kieβling W. Increased robustness of Bayesian networks through probabilityintervals[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,1997,17:37-76.
    [100] Coupé V M H, Gaag L C v d. Properties of Sensitivity Analysis of Bayesian Belief Networks[J]. Annalsof Mathematics andArtifcial Intelligence,2002,36:323-356.
    [101]梁洪泉.动态贝叶斯网络在战场目标态势威胁评估中的应用[D].北京:北京邮电大学,2007.
    [102] Dempster A P. A generalization of Bayesian inference[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society SeriesB,1968,30(2):205-247.
    [103] Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press,1976.
    [104] Kohlas, A M P. A Mathematical Theory of Hints: An Approach to Dempster-Shafer Theory ofEvidence[R], Lecture Note in Economics and Mathematical Systems.
    [105] R H. Probabilistic argumentation systems: a new perspective on Dempster-Shafer theory[J].Intemational Journal of Intelligent Systems,18(1):93-106.
    [106] John Y. Generalizing the Dempster-Shafer theory to Fuzzy Sets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Manand Cybernetics,1990,20(3):559-570.
    [107]张文修,梁怡,徐萍.基于包含度的不确定性推理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007.
    [108] Perry W L, Stephanou H. Belief function divergence as a classifier[A], Proceedings of the1991IEEEInternational Symposium on Intelligent Control[C], IEEE,1991:280-285.
    [109] Tessem B. Approximations for effcient computation in the theory of evidence[J]. Artifcial Intelligence,1993,61(2):315–329.
    [110] Han D, Deng Y, Han C, et al. Some notes on betting commitment distance in evidence theory[J].Science China,2012,55(3):558-565.
    [111] L.M.Zouhal, T.Denoeux. An evidence-theoretic k-nn rule with parameter optimization[J]. IEEETransactions On Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Reviews,1998,28(2):263-271.
    [112] Smarandache F, Martin A, Osswald C. Contradiction measures and specifcity degrees of basic beliefassignments[A], International Conference on Information Fusion[C], Boston, USA,2011.
    [113] A.Martin, A.-L.Jouselme, C.Osswald. Conflict measure for the discounting operation on belieffunctions[A], IEEE international conference on information fusion[C],2008:1-8.
    [114] Quost B, Masson M-H, Denoeux T. Classifer fusion in the Dempster-Shafer framework usingoptimized t-norm based combination rules[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2011,52(3):353-374.
    [115] Cuzzolin F. Consistent approximations of belief functions[A], The6thInternational Symposium onImprecise Probability: Theories and Applications[C], Durham, United Kingdom,2009.
    [116] Cuzzolin F. Lp consonant approximations of belief functions[J]. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems (underreview).
    [117] Wen C, Wang Y, Xu X. Fuzzy information fusion algorithm of fault diagnosis based on similaritymeasure of evidence[A], Advances in Neural Networks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science[C],2008,5264:506-515.
    [118] Khatibi V, Montazer G A. A New Evidential Distance Measure Based on Belief Intervals[J]. ScienceIranica Transactions D: Computer Science&Engineering and Electrical Engineering,2010,17:119-132.
    [119] Jousselme A-L, Maupin P. Distances in evidence theory: Comprehensive survey and generalizations[J].International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2012,53:118-145.
    [120] Jousselme A-L, Grenier D,Bosse E. A new distance between two bodies of evidence[J]. InformationFusion,2001,2:91-101.
    [121] Han D, Dezert J, Han C, et al. New dissimilarity measures in evidence theory[A], Proceedings of the14thInternational Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)[C], IEEE,2011:1-7.
    [122] Cobb B R, Shenoy P P. On the plausibility transformation method for translating belief function modelsto probability models[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2006,41(3):314-330.
    [123] Smets P, R. K. The transferable belief model[J]. Artificial Intelligence,1994,66(4):191-234.
    [124] Cuzzolin F. On the properties of the Intersection probability[J]. submitted to the Annals of Mathematicsand AI,2007.
    [125] Lifang H, You H, Xin G, et al. A New Probabilistic Transformation in Generalized Power Space[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2011,24:449-460.
    [126] Deqiang H, Dezert J, Chongzhao H, et al. Is entropy enough to evaluate the probability transformationapproach of belief function?[A], The13th Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)[C],2010:1-7.
    [127]许培达,韩德强,邓勇.一种基本概率赋值转换为概率的最优化方法[J].电子学报,2011,39(3A):121-125.
    [128] J.Sudano. Yet Another Paradigm Illustrating Evidence Fusion(YAPIEF)[A], Proc. of Fusion06[C],Florence,2006.
    [129] Dezert J, Smarandache F. A new probabilistic transformation of belief mass assignment[A], The11thInternational Conference on Information Fusion [C],2008:1-8.
    [130]王万请,赵拥军,黄洁,等.基于不确定度的基本概率赋值概率转换方法[J].控制与决策,2013,8.
    [131] A Z L. A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule ofcombination[J]. AI magazine,1986,2(7):85-90.
    [132] Florea M C, Jousselme A-L, Bossé é, et al. Robust combination rules for evidence theory[J].Information Fusion,2009,10(2):183-197.
    [133] Denoeux T. The cautious rule of combination for belief functions and some extensions, InternationalConference on Information Fusion[C], Italy,2006.
    [134] Osswald C, Martin A. Understanding the large family of Dempster-Shafer theory's fusion operators-adecision-based measure[A], International Conference on Information Fusion[C], Italy,2006.
    [135] Martin A, Osswald C. Toward a combination rule to deal with partial confict and specifcity in belieffunctions theory[A], International Conference on Information Fusion[C], Canada,2007.
    [136] Martin A, Jousselme A-L, Osswald C. Confict measure for the discounting operation on belieffunctions[A], International Conference on Information Fusion[C], Germany,2008.
    [137]胡昌华,司小胜,周志杰,等.新的证据冲突衡量标准下的D-S改进算法[J].电子学报,2009,37(7):1578-1583.
    [138] Martin A. About confict in the theory of belief functions[J]. BELIEF FUNCTIONS: THEORY ANDAPPLICATIONS Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing,2012,164:161-168.
    [139] xiaoge Z, ya L, yajuan Z, et al. A new method to measure conflict in evidece theory[J]. Journal ofComputational Information Systems,2012,8(12):4865-4872.
    [140]邓勇,王栋,李齐,等.一种新的证据冲突分析方法[J].控制理论与应用,2011,28(6):839-844.
    [141] Liu W. Analyzing the degree of confict among belief functions[J]. Artifcial Intelligence,2006,170:909-924.
    [142]蒋雯,张安,邓勇.改进的二元组冲突表示方法[J].红外与激光工程,2009,38(5):936-940.
    [143]蒋雯,彭进业,邓勇.一种新的证据冲突表示方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2010,32(3):562-563.
    [144] Ying P, Huairong S. Combination rule for belief functions based on improved measure of conflict[A],2010IEEE International Conference on Information Theory and Information Security (ICITIS)[C],2010:1134-1138.
    [145] Smarandache F, Dezert J. Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion(Volume2)[M].Rehoboth: American Research Press,2006.
    [146] E. L, Colot O,Vannoorenberghe P. Belief function combination and conflict management[J].Information Fusion,2002,3(3):149-162.
    [147] C.K. M. Combining Belief Functions When Evidence Conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems,2000,29:1-9.
    [148] Yong D, Wenkang S, Zhenfu Z, et al. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence[J].Decision Support Systems,2004,38(3):489-493.
    [149]韩德强,韩崇昭,邓勇,等.基于证据方差的加权证据组合[J].电子学报,2011,39(3A):153-157.
    [150] Deqiang H, Yong D, Chongzhao H, et al. Weighted evidence combination based on distance of evidenceand uncertainty[J]. J. Infrared Millim. Waves,2011,30(5):396-400.
    [151] R.R. Y. On the Dempster-Shafer Framework and New Combination Fules[J]. Information Sciences,1987,41:93-137.
    [152] Dubois D, Prade H. Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibilitymeasures[J]. Computational Intelligence,1988,4:244-264.
    [153] D D, H P. A set theoretical view of belief functions[J]. International Journal of Generalized Systems,1986,12(3):193-226.
    [154] Smets P. Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty[J]. Uncertainty inArtificial Intelligence,1990,5:29-40.
    [155] Smarandache F, Dezert J. Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion[M]. Rehoboth:American Research Press,2004.
    [156] Xin W, Yindong J, Xiaobin X, et al. Combining Belief Functions Based on Three Mechanisms: Average,Multiplication and Intersection[A],2012Fifth International Conference on Intelligent ComputationTechnology and Automation (ICICTA)[C],2012:494-500.
    [157]杨艺,韩德强,韩崇昭.基于多准则排序融合的证据组合方法[J].自动化学报,2012,38(5):823-831.
    [158] R H. Are Alternatives to Dempster's rule of combination real alternative? Comments on "about thebelief function combination and the conflict management problem"[J]. Information Fusion,2002,3(4):237-239.
    [159] G S. Rejoinder to Comments on "Perspectives in the theory and practice of belief functions"[J].International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,1992,6:445-480.
    [160] Z L, Q P, Y C, et al. Sequential adaptive combination of unreliable sources of evidence[A], Proceedingof workshop on the theory of belief functions[C], Brest, France,2010.
    [161]吴英,蒋雯,王栋,等.一种最优冲突证据组合方法[J].电机与控制学报,2009,13:178-182.
    [162] Liu Z g, Dezert J, Pan Q, et al. Combination of sources of evidence with different discounting factorsbased on a new dissimilarity measure[J]. Decision Support Systems,2011,52:133-141.
    [163] Klein J, Colot O. Automatic discounting rate computation using a dissent criterion[A], Proceedings ofthe Workshop on the Theory of Belief Functions[C], Brest, France,2010:1-6.
    [164]周哲,徐晓滨,文成林,等.冲突证据融合的优化方法[J].自动化学报,2012,38(6):976-985.
    [165] Martin A, Jousselme A-L, Osswald C. Confict measure for the discounting operation on belieffunctions[A], Proceedings of the11thInternational Conference on Information Fusion[C], Cologne,Germany,2008,1003–1010.
    [166] D M, B Q, T D. Refined modeling of sensor reliability in the belief function framework usingcontextual discounting[J]. Information Fusion,2008,9(2):246-258.
    [167] H Z, O B. Extended Discounting Scheme for Evidential Reasoning as Applied to MS LesionDetection[A], The7th International Conference on Information Fusion[C], Sweden,2004,280-287.
    [168] D M, T D, M M. General Correction Mechanisms for Weakening or Reinforcing Belief Functions[A],The9th International Conference on Information Fusion[C], Italy,2006:1-7.
    [169] Y D. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence[J]. Decision Support Systems,2004,38:489-493.
    [170] Garvey T D, Lowrance J D, Fischler M A. An inference technique for integrating knowledge fromdisparate sources[A], Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artifcial Intelligence[C],1981:319-325.
    [171] Svensson P. On reliability and trustworthiness of high-level fusion-based decision support systems:basic concepts and possible formal methodologies[A], Proceedings of the9thInternational Conferenceon Information fusion[C],2006.
    [172] Xinhan H, Peng L, Min W. Evidence reasoning machine based on DSmT for mobile robot mapping inunknown dynamic environment[A], IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics[C],Guilin,2009:753-758.
    [173] Florea M C, Bosse E. Crisis Management using Dempster Shafer Theory: Using dissimilarity measuresto characterize sources' reliability[A], C3I in Crisis, Emergency and Consequence Management[C],Bucharest,2009:17-1-17-14.
    [174] Cuzzolin F. Two new Bayesian approximations of belief functions based on convex geometry[J]. IEEETransactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics,2007,37(4):993-1008.
    [175] Dempster A. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping[J]. Annals ofMathematical Statistics,1967,38:325-339.
    [176] Y. H J, R. F. A new approach to updating beliefs[J]. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence,1991,6.
    [177] Cuzzolin F. On the relative belief transform[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2012,53(5):786–804.
    [178]贾宇平.基于信任函数理论的融合目标识别研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2009.
    [179] P S, R K. The transferable belief model[J]. Artificial Intelligence,1994,66(3).
    [180] Daniel M. On Probabilistic Transformations of Belief Functions[A]. Symbolic and QuantitativeApproaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty(ECSQARU2005)[C], LNAI,2005,3571:539-551.献
    [181] Smets P. Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation[J]. InternationalJournal of Approximate Reasoning,2005,38:133-147.
    [182] E.T.Jaynes. Information theory and statistical mechanics[J]. Physical Review,1957,106(4):620-630.
    [183] Daniel M. Consistency of Probabilistic Transformations of Belief Functions[A]. Proceedings of theTenth International conference IPMU[C],2004:1135-1142.
    [184] Sudano J J. Pignistic probability transforms for mixes of low and high probability events[A], The4thInternational Conference on Information Fusion[C], Canada,2001:23-27.
    [185] F. S, A. M, Osswald. Contradiction measures and specifcity degrees of basic belief assignments[A],International Conference on Information Fusion[C], Boston, USA,2011.
    [186] RVL H. Transmission of information[J]. Bell System Technical Journal,1928,7:535-563.
    [187] C.E.Shannon. A Mathematical Theory of Communication[J]. Bell Syst.Tech.J,1948,27:379-423and623-656.
    [188] D D, H. P. A note on measures of specificity for fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of General Systems,1985,10(4):279-283.
    [189] D H, GJ K. Measuring total uncertainty in Dempster-Shafer theory[J]. International Journal of GeneralSystems,1994,22(4):405-419.
    [190]韩德强,邓勇,韩崇昭,等.利用不确定度的冲突证据组合[J].控制理论与应用,2011,28(6):788-792.
    [191] Jousselme A-L, Liu C, Grenier D. Measuring Ambiguity in the Evidence Theory[J]. IEEE Transactionson Systems, Man and Cybernetics,2006,36(5):890-903.
    [192] Klir G J, Wierman M J, Uncertainty-based information, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing[M].New York: Heidelberg,1999.
    [193] Tessem B. Approximations for efficient computation in the theory of evidence[J]. Artifcial Intelligence,1993,61:315-329.
    [194] B.Ristic, P.Smets. The TBM global distance measure for the association of uncertain combat IDdeclarations[J]. Information Fusion,2006,7:276-284.
    [195] J.Sudano. The system probability information content (PIC) relationship to contributing components,combining independent multi-source beliefs, hybrid and pedigree pignistic probabilities[A],Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion[C], Annapolis,2002.
    [196] Rudin W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis[M].1976.
    [197] Klein J, Colot O. Singular sources mining using evidential confict[J]. International Journal ofApproximate Reasoning,2011,52(9).
    [198]蒋黎明,何加浪,张宏.D-S证据理论中一种新的冲突证据融合方法[J].计算机科学,2011,38(4):236-238.
    [199] F C. A geometric approach to the theory of evidence[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man andCybernetics,2008,38:522-534.
    [200] Yuxin C, Jiyi W, Jian C, et al. A more effective definition of evidential conflict combined with evidentialdistance[J]. Journal of Information&Computational Science,2011,8(9):1729-1734.
    [201]史超,程咏梅.基于证据冲突度的多传感器冲突信息组合方法[J].计算机应用研究,2011,28(3):865-868.
    [202] RR Y. On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules[J]. Information Sciences,1987,41(2):93-137.
    [203] D D, H P. Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibilitymeasures[J]. Computational Intelligence,1988,4:244-264.
    [204] Smets P, R. K. The transferable belief model[J]. Artificial Intelligence,1994,66(4):191-234.
    [205]胡丽芳,关欣,何友,等.基于Haenni方法的证据冲突原因分析[J].信息与电子工程,2011,9(2):219-223.
    [206] P S. The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model[J]. IEEE Transactions on PatternAnalysis and Machine Intelligence,1990,447-458.
    [207] Elouedi Z, Lefèvre E, Mercier D. Discountings of a Belief Function using a Confusion Matrix[A], IEEEInternational Conference onTools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)[C], Tunis, Tunisia,2010,1:287-294.
    [208] Smarandache F, Dezert J, Tacnet J. Fusion of sources of evidence with different importances andreliabilities[A], The13th Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)[C],2010:1-8.
    [209] Xiaosheng S, Changhua H, Jianbo Y, et al. On the dynamic evidential reasoning algorithm for faultprediction[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38:5061-5080.
    [210] W G H, K S W, Y D. Evaluating sensor reliability in classification problems based on evidence theory[J].IEEE Transactions On SMC-PART B:Cybern,2006,36(5):970-981.
    [211] L R G, V N. Reliability in Information Fusion: Literature Survey[A], The7thInternational Conferenceon Information Fusion[C], Sweden,2004,1158-1165.
    [212] FP d L, O J, S D. Accumulation of evidence during sequential decision making: the importance oftop-down factors[J]. Journal of Neuroscience,2010,30:731-738.
    [213] FP d L, S v G, VAF L, et al. How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During HumanDecision-Making[J]. PLoS Biology,2011,9(11):1-10.
    [214]何兵,毛士艺,张有为,等.基于证据分类的DS证据合成及判决方法[J].电子与信息学报,2002.21(7):894-899.
    [215]陈圣群,王应明.证据的分组合成法[J].控制与决策,2013,4.
    [216] T a, MN S. Probabilistic reasoning by neurons[J]. Nature,2007,447:1075-1080.
    [217] A Z L. A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule ofcombination[J]. AI Magazine,1986,7(2):85-90.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700