用户名: 密码: 验证码:
矿业权价值评估的竞争分析法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
矿业权评估价值系统性偏低于拍卖成交价款的事实说明,矿业权价值评估的现有方法可能有缺陷的,评估判据可能有问题的。2005年以来澳大利亚铁矿石出口价格逐年上涨71.5%、19%、16.5%和88.92%,2008年与2004年的比价为5.81:1,这一案例甚至动摇了人们对公平市场价值准则的信念。此外,矿山经营的长期性、矿产品价格的波动性,都不支持矿业权价值评估的现有规范要求。增强评估的客观性、合理性、公正性、科学性和准确性,需要直面问题并弥补理论缺陷。
     针对暴露出来的评估问题,论文没有沿着参数修正等途径,去改善现有矿业权价值评估方法,而是直接探寻造成系统性评估偏差的原因,并据此设计新的评估方案。研究的重点也不停留于传统的个体评估,而转向对矿业权价值的总体评估。超越评估业务7项目的,论文研究的新方法主要服务于矿业的战略经营。
     论文从经济学角度研究矿业权价值评估。在分析矿产资源价值构成、形成和确认中,以规范研究方法为主;在研究矿产品价格波动、评估偏差等问题时,则主要采用实证方法。根据总体分析的需要,论文在实证研究中主要采用统计工具。除了遵循矿业经济学常规理论外,论文研究的理论根基是利润平均化理论、产业竞争分析和经济循环理论。
     论文的主要工作包括如下几个方面:
     提出一套矿业权价值总体评估的方法。除了评估结果不准确外,现有矿业权价值评估未考虑矿业周期的影响,也未清楚表明投资目的。可是,矿产品价格却有长度为28年的周期,并且波幅大,各矿种的周期同步性显著。为了反映资本趋利特性和矿业经营特征,本文以马克思的利润平均化理论为基础,提出依据资本收益率趋同准则评估矿业权价值的新方法。这一方法通过产业竞争分析的途径来推算资本收益指标值,以期望价格来反映矿山长期经营的特征,消除矿产品时序波动对矿业权价值评估产生的系统性偏差、反映矿山长期经营的实际。以铁矿石为计算案例,按照资本收益率趋同准则的评估,可以甄别市场价格过高、过低的异常情况,能够界定合理的价格范围。这从一个侧面验证了采用资本收益率趋同准则来进行矿业权价值评估的合理性。
     把产业竞争分析方法应用于矿业权价值评估中。根据波特的产业竞争理论,相关产业之间具有相对竞争优势,竞争优势的显著标志是获利能力大小。本文据此用相关产业的资本收益指标值来确定评估对象的资本收益指标值范围,根据产业内部竞争强度,分别给出乐观、折中、谨慎的评估计算式,计算程序和参照选择,把产业竞争分析方法应用到矿业权价值评估中。这样的做法,尽管少了些数值计算精确,却更符合评估的实际,所以案例评估的结果置信度更高。
     通过实证研究得出:矿业周期长28年,价格波动幅度大。实证得知,原油和铁矿石都有长为28年的价格周期,并且两者的相关系数为90.25%。原油在一个周期内的年度平均价格的下探幅度为70%、上探幅度为58%;一个年度内的原油价格波动幅度在16%到70%之间,近10年平均波幅为35.7%。铁矿石在一个周期内的年度平均价格的下探幅度为37%、上探幅度为245%。铁矿石偏离期望价格10%以上的时间概率达60%,从而证明传统规范评估是测不准矿业权价值的。另外从计算知,2004/2005年间,合理预期价格下新方法评估价值是铁矿权评估价值的1.335倍到5.917倍,此测算结果与根据公开拍卖数据整理的事实基本一致,这说明新方法具有一定的解释力,是有参考意义的。
     同时,叙述归纳了矿山的经营特征。作者认为,研究不是就事论事的活动,研究的逻辑起点不是研究对象的现实状况,而是从现状中归结出来特征特性。以往人们似乎不够关注矿业经营的特征,论文对此做了些弥补。矿业的主要经营特性有长期性、周期性、价格波幅大、投资规模大、滞后于经济周期、寡头垄断竞争格局、不可逆性、可延迟性、不确定性、环境依存性等。
The fact that a mining rights evaluation (MRE) is usually less than the cost of its successful bidder, reveals fact that there may be defects in the methods of the MRE available or problem in its criterion. Epecially, the exporting price of iron ore from Australia increases yearly 71.5%,19%,16.5%,88.92% since 2005, the ratio of the 2008's price to the 2004's is 5.81:1,which shakes people's belief in the criterion of fair market valuation. Furthmore, the currently guidelines of the the MRE are also not supported by such facts as the long-term of mine business, the fluctuation character of minerals price and the like. To enhance the objectivity, rationality, fairness, scientificalness and veracity of the MRE, it is worthwhile facing the prblems and making up for the theoretic defects.
     To the questions revealed,this dissertation pays attention directly to analysizing the causes which bring about the systematic bias of the MRE and to developing a new method for the MRE accordingly, and not to improving the pre-existing methods by such way as corrected parameter. The focuses of the study are located to the overall evaluation of the MRE,and not to the individual evaluation as before. Beyond the seven business purposes of the MRE, the new method is aimed at the strategic business for mining industry.
     This dissertation researchs on MRE from the standpoint of economics. Normative research methods have the main application in analysizing the constitution,formation and confirmation of mineral resources valuation. Empirical research methods have their main application in the fluctuation of minerals price, the bias of the MRE and the like. This dissertation mostly applies statistic tools owing to the needs of overall analysis. Except for following general theory of mining economics, our theory roots in Marx's average returns on investment, competitive analysis and economical cirlulation theory.
     This dissertation's main contents include as follow:
     A overall evaluation method for MRE is proposed. The currently available methods of the MRE don't consider the influences of the period of mining industry and don't make clear the investment objectives, besides their accuracy being lower. Hawever, the length of the period of minerals'price is 28 years, the fluctuation of the price is wide, and the periodical synchronicity of all sors of minerals is obvious. This dissertation puts a method forward to the evaluation according to the criterion of capital yield convergence, based on Marx's average returns on investment, which is much suit with the characteristics of capital gain and mining business. The new method get the targeted value of capital gain by the way of competitive analysis, expected price used in calculation to suit with the characteristics of the long-term of mining business and to eliminate the systematic bias caused by time series wave of minerals's price. As an numerical calculation casus for iron ore on the basis of the criterion of capital yield convergence, the new method can discriminate the anomalies of its price, i.e.it can fix the range of its reasonable price. This demonstrates the rationality with the criterion of capital yield convergence to the MRE.
     This dissertation applies the methods of competitive analysis to evaluate mining rights. According to Porter's industry competition theory, it is of relative competitive advantage among industries interrelated, which is remarkably indicated by the capacity of obtaining benefits. This dissertation takes measuments and calculates the upper-lower limit of the targeted value of capital gain according to the targeted value of capital gain of industries interrelated. This dissertation also gives formulas with respectively to optimistic, cautious and average distinguished by the intensity difference of the industrial competition,and with its computational procedure and its parameters setting, applying the methods of competitive analysis in the MRE. This way much correspond with the actual state in evaluation, despite of losting some accuracy in numerical calculation, so the assessment result as the casus being of higher degree of its confidence.
     Some empirical conclutions are obtained such as 28 years cycle length of mining industry and wide fluctuation of its price. It demonstates that the length of their price period of crude oil and iron ore is 28 years and the related coefficient between them is equal to 90.25%. With regard to crude oil annual average price, the hit bottom width is 70%, the top 58%. The annual fluctuation range of oil price is changed from 16% to 70%, the average being 35.7% in recent 10 years. With regard to iron ore annual average price, the hit bottom width is 37%, the top 245%. The probablity is about 60% for the iron ore price off the expected price over 10%, with which we can understand that the current methods are indeterminative in normality condition. It is known by calculation that the value by the new method is 1.335-5.917 times to the traditional evaluation between 2004 and 2005, the calculated result in roughly keeping with the first fact arranged by the public auction data. This proves that the new methd is surely of explanation functions and referential meaning.
     In the meantime, some characteristics of mining business are induced. This author believes that research activities don't consider something as it stands, and the logic origin of research activity is't the realities of sduty object but its features induced. Owing to the fact that people do not pays enough attention to these features before, to some extent, this dissertation makes some up for it. The main features of mining business are such as the long-term, periodicity, wide amplitude for its price, large scale of investment, lag behind of economic period, oblqopoly competition, irreversibility, delayability, nondeterminacy, surroundings dependency and the like.
引文
[1]詹朝阳、崔彬、欧阳瑜华,国外矿业权评估方法综述[J],中国矿业,2003(12),16-18,42
    [2]李德,包胜志,矿业权评估方法综述[J],采矿技术,2005(1),101-102
    [3]刘朝马.矿业权估价理论与方法[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2003.
    [4]王广成.矿产资源管理理论与方法[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2002.
    [5]夏佐铎、姚书振,我国矿业权评估准则体系架构研究[J],煤炭经济研究,2007(5),30-32
    [6]向永生,金矿资源矿业权评估理论与方法研究[D],北京科技大学,20001201,博士论文
    [7]王春秀,矿业权市场及矿业权价值评估研究[D],昆明理工大学,20030528.博士论文
    [8]徐兰军,耗竭性资源资产评估理论与方法研究[D],中南大学,200302,博士论文
    [9]刘铁华,我国矿业权评估方法与参数研究[D],中国地质大学(北京),2007-06-26,博士论文
    [10]BRENNAN M. J., SCHWARTZ E. S. Evaluating Natural Resource Investments[J]. Journal of Business, 1985, (2):135-157.
    [11]耿书文,基于博弈论的矿业权评估理论与方法研究[D],北京科技大学,20020125,博士论文
    [12]黄生权,基于实物期权理论的矿业投资决策理论与方法研究[D],中南大学,2006-11-27,博士论文
    [13]喻建良、戴塔根,实物期权价值忽视与国有资产流失——我国现行矿业权价值评估方法评述[J], 湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2005(6),60-62
    [14]Markowitz H M. Portfolio Selection [J].Journal of Finance,1952,7:77-91
    [15]Sharpe W F. Capital Asset Prices:a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk[J]. Journal of Finance,1964,19:425-442
    [16]Soss S. The arbitrage theory of capital asset priceing[J]. Journal of Economic Thery,1976,13:341-360
    [17]Konno H, Yamazaki H. Mean-absollute deviation portfoliooptimization model anITS applications to Tokyo stock market[J]. Management Science,1991,37:519-531
    [18]Luis H.R. Alvarez and Rune Stenbacka, Optimal risk adoption:a real options approach, Economic Theory,2004.23,123-147
    [19]Dixit A. Irreversible investment with uncertainty and scale economics[J], Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,1995,19(3):327-350
    [20]Brannan M J, Schwartz E S, Evaluating Natural Resource Investments [J], Journal of Business,1985, Vol.58 No.2:135-156.
    [21]Gerald Feltham and Janes A. Ohlson. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities [J].Contemporary Acounting Research,1995(9).,105-112
    [22]阳正熙,Bre-X骗局始末——矿床勘查史上-宗最大的丑闻[J],中国地质矿产经济,1998(11),26-30
    [23]云南东川博卡金矿骗局[EB/OL], blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_45ea206b0100a4h2.html 33K 2008-9-2
    [24]Batman金矿床事件始末[EB/OL], www.cqvip.com/qk/95607X/199702/2511824.html 26K 2008-12-7
    [25]吴杰,矿产资源储量公允价值计量模式研究[J],长江大学学报(社会科学版),2009(2),50-54
    [26]修订小组,矿业权评估指南(2004年修订版)[M],中国大地出版社,2006-04-01
    [27]矿业权评估准则[EB/OL],资料来源:http//www. mlr. gov. cn/xwdt/jrxw/200808/
    [28]项波, 陶知翔.矿业权概念之思考[J].江西理工大学学报,2006,(05),77-79
    [29]李柏林,彭绍贤,李英龙.矿业权法律与矿产资源所有权比较[J].中国矿业,2003,(05),20-22
    [29]戴永生,国内外矿业权之法律属性分析[J], 世界有色金属,2006,(02),43-47
    [30]张桦、黎萍、邢磊,浅谈矿业权价值评估的基本原则[J],资源产业,2001(4),24-26
    [31]许抄军,罗能生,王良健.我国矿产资源产权研究综述及发展方向[J].中国矿业,2007(1),20-22
    [32]彭方思.浅析矿产资源所有权矿业权特征及其相互关系[J].中国地质,2000(4),20-21,24
    [33]陈建宏、古德生,矿业经济学[M],中南大学出版社,2007.8,
    [34]张钦礼、王新民、刘保卫,矿产资源评估学[M],中南大学出版社,2007.7
    [35]刘丽松,资产评估前沿报告[M],中国经济出报社,2001.2
    [36]Rausser.G. A.Small.Valuing research leads:biospecting and the conservation of v-enetic resource[J].Journal of Political Economy,2000,108(1):173-206
    [37]翁春林、叶加冕、李锡康,采矿权价值评估方法研究[J],矿业研究与开发,2004(3),16-18,41
    [38]刘建兵谢英亮,基于平均回弹过程矿业权价值评估的收益法模型[J],有色金属,2003(5),46-48
    [39]查道林冯永志,矿业权收益核算探讨[J],财会通讯,2007(9),53-54
    [40]Lohmann J R, The IRR NPV and Payback Period and Their Relative Performance in Common Capital Bud-getting Decision Procedures for Dealing with Risk [J]. The Engineering Economist.1993.39(1)
    [41]晁坤.运用DCF法进行采矿权评估时折现率的合理确定[J].煤炭经济研究,2004,(06),17-18
    [42]张桦, 朱林, 郑建斌.采矿权评估中风险因素的实务分析[J].中国矿业,2004,(02),32·35
    [43]徐鹏彪 王全生,采矿权评估价值合理性探讨[J],煤炭经济研究,2007(5),33-34
    [44]黄生权、孙宗硕,基于不确定性的矿业投资评价指标[J],中国矿业,2003(11),-16-17
    [45]Randall A, Ives B, Eastman C. Bidding games of aesthetic environmental improvements [J] Journal of Environmental Management and Econonmics,1974(1),132-149
    [46]王全生, 戴风良, 李克荣.采矿权评估计算方法及参数确定探讨[J].煤炭经济研究,2000,(03),19-21
    [47]陆建华, 张立明.关于采矿权评估实际工作中几个问题的探讨[J].中国地质矿产经济,2003,(05),25-26
    [48]晁坤.对采矿权评估方法中贴现现金流量法的思考[J].煤炭经济研究,2005,(10),12-13
    [49]翁春林、叶加冕、李锡康,采矿权价值评估方法研究[J],矿业研究与开发,2004.024(003),-16-18,
    [50]王文才,蔡嗣经、采矿权评估急需推广可比销售法[J],有色金属,2005(2),16-20
    [51]廖作鸿等.实物期权方法在矿业权评估中的应用初探[J].矿产保护与利用,2002,8:1-3
    [52]BRENNAN M J, SCHWARTZ E S.Evaluating Natural Re-source Investments[J]. Journal of Business,1985, (2):135-157
    [53]Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment under uncertainty[M]. Princeton University Press,1994
    [54]Kogut.B, N.Kulatilaka. Options thinking and platform investments:investing in opportunity[J], California Management Review,1994,36(2):52-67
    [55]Palm S K, Pearson N D, Read J A, Jr. Option Pricing:a new approach to mine valuation [J]. CIM Bulltin, May 1986:61-88.
    [56]Brannan M J, Schwartz E S, Evaluating Natural Resource Investments [J], Journalof Business,1985, Vol.58 No.2:135-156.
    [57]廖作鸿、李晓昭、彭会清,生产阶段矿业投资评估模型建立的实物期权方法[J],中国矿业,2007(4),28-30
    [58]王春秀、李英龙,期权定价理论与矿业权价值评估[J],技术经济与管理研究,2002(6),44-45
    [59]周洛华著.资产定价学[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2004:61-70
    [60]黄生权、陈晓红,基于实物期权的矿业投资最佳时机决策模型[J],系统工程,2008(3),65-67
    [61]李松青、刘异玲,基于延迟实物期权的矿业投资决策模型[J],系统工程,2006(4),124-126
    [62]J. Ingersoll & S. Ross, Waiting to invest:Investment and Uncertainty[J]. Journal of Business,1992
    [63]张宏哲、李英龙,复合期权模型在矿业工程投资决策中的应用[J],价值工程,2006(8)
    [64]L. Trigeorgis. Real Options:Managerial Flexibility an Strategy in Resource Allocation[M]. The MIT Press, 1996
    [65]L. Trigeorgis. Real Options and Interactions with Financial Flexibility [J], Financial Management 22,1993
    [66]Paddock J, Siegel D, Smith J. Options valuation ofclaims on physical assets:the case of offshore petroleum lease[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1988,103(3):479-508.
    [67]ArmstrongM, A.Option pricing:anew approach to valuing mining projects [J], CIM Bulletin,1997,19(12), 37-44
    [68]Zhai, Lian-Yin. Feature extraction using rough set theory and genetic algorithms-An application for the simplification of product quality evaluation [J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering,2002 (4),661-676
    [69]严绍兵安艳杰,对公平市场价值的思考[J],辽宁财税,2000(12),48-49
    [70]张国华,刘胜富,矿业权评估的价值标准浅析[J],资源产业经济,2003(8),33-40
    [71]谢贵明,矿业权价值构成的初步探讨[J],中国国土资源经济,2004(10),21-22
    [72]李万亨,矿业权价值的构成及其经济实现[J],地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2002(1),81-84
    [73]刘金平、裴宗平,矿产资源自然价值及其费用[J],云南冶金,1994,87(2),23-25
    [74]Jose Pinera. Wealth Through Ownership:Creating Property Rights in Chilean mining[J]. Cato Journal.2004 (3).295-302.
    [75]McLeod H. Compensation for land owners affected by mineral development:the Fijian experience[J].Resources Policy,2000(26):115-125.
    [76]Robert Constanza, Ralph d Arge, Rudolf de Groot, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem service and natural capital [J].Nat,1997,387:253-260.
    [77]刘金平、裴宗平,矿产资源自然价值及其费用[J],云南冶金,1994,87(2),23-25
    [78]翁春林、叶加冕、李锡康,采矿权价值评估方法研究[J],矿业研究与开发,2004.024(003),-16-18,41
    [79]Charies M.C.Lee..Accounting-Based Valuation Impact on Business Practices and Research [J]. A counting horizon, December 1999,13(4):413-425.
    [80]Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being:a framework for assessment[M].Washington DC:Island Press,2003
    [81]James P. Dorfan & H. Brett Humphreys,矿业对经济的影响——过渡经济国家中矿业的新地位[J],地质技术经济管理,1995(3),赵连荣译自:Natural resources Forum,1994,18(1),22-25
    [82]Kofi Annan, Klaus Topfer, Global Environment Outlook 3[M].Londan, Earthscan Publications Ltd,2002
    [83]陈林杰,我国金属矿业经济增长影响因素分析与发展战略[J],科技和产业,2009(2),1-14
    [84]万会、沈镭,矿业城市发展的影响因素及可持续发展对策[J],资源科学,2005(1),20-25
    [85]胡明扬、肖唐付、杨志勇、徐安全,矿业外部性问题[J],中国矿业.2004.013(008).-13-16
    [86]赵鹏大等,矿产勘探理论与技术[M],北京:中国地质大学出版社,2001
    [87]张明燕,用环境标准建立和规范矿业[J],资源产业,2001(11),44-45
    [88]夏玉成、石平五,关于环境变迁和矿业工程效益的讨论[J],中国矿业,2002(1),63-66
    [89]樊杰、孙威、王玉平,“矿产资源-基础工业”发展战略的综合集成研究——以中国东部地区为例[J],中国矿业大学学报,2004.033(004),462-467
    [90]白丁,国外有色金属矿山建设的成本[J],世界有色金属,2005(4),57-59
    [91]廖作鸿、黄敬宝,矿业投资项目不确定性和实物期权分析[J],工业技术经济,2005(7),104-106
    [92]李志民,基于敏感性分析的矿业投资决策持续优化研究[J],投资研究,2008(8),39-42
    [93]Unite Nation, Integrated Environment and Economics Accounting[M], New York:U.N.1993
    [94]Piramuthu, Selwyn. Evaluating feature selection methods for learning in data mining applications [J].(Decision and Information Sciences, University of Florida,351 Stuzin Hall) Source:European Journal of Operational Research, v156, n2, Jul16,2004, p483-494
    [95]Eger, T. Salmoni, A.; Whissell, R. Factors influencing load-haul-dump operator line of sight in underground mining[J]. Applied Ergonomics,93-103
    [96]尹桥, 中国钨业现状与发展分析[N],消费日报,20050511
    [97]刘菁、李兴文、杨媛媛,中国现有钨储量静态保证开采年限屈指可数[N],中国税务报,20050110
    [98]张丽华,2003年中国钨半成品出口2.6万吨[N],中国矿业报,20050111
    [99]李丰洲,中国钨价暴涨凸显产业结构与资源配置困局[N],中国工业报,20050425
    [100]刘良先,治理整顿、总量控制、行业自律助推钨价高位盘桓[J],中国钨业,2006(4),3-6
    [101]龚家友,钱学锋,中国对外贸易贫困化增长的实证分析[J], 贵州财经学院学报-2003(4),40-44
    [102]Michael E. porter. Competitive Advantage[M]. New York:Free Press.1985
    [103]Michael E. porter. Competitive Advantage of Nations[M]. New York:Copyright.1998
    [104]周三多、陈传明、鲁明泓,管理学——原理与方法,复旦大学出版社,2004.8,307-309
    [105]朱灏,从两类典型经济循环看经济社会的科学发展,中南大学学报,2006(4),471-476
    [106]朱灏,韩国经济循环增强的动力机制探析[J],亚太经济,2008(1),50-54
    [107]朱灏,美国的经济自增强循环流程体系研究及启示,世界经济导刊,2005(6),63-69
    [108]Schulze, William D, Brookshire D, et al. The economic benefits of preserving visibility in the National Parkland of the Southwest [J],1983,23:149-165
    [109]兰兴华,欧洲锌矿山生产成本的比较——从生产到废物管理[J],中国铅锌锡锑,2005(1),9·12
    [110]Kogut.B, N.Kulatilaka. Options thinking and platform investments:investing in opportunity[J]. California Management Review,1994,36(2):52-67
    [111]郦天权、焦玉书,论矿山成本计算与国际接轨[J],中国矿业,2004(1),-22-26
    [112]张霉,美洲黄金矿山生产成本[J],国土资源情报,2005(11),31-34
    [113]夏玉成、石平五,关于环境变迁和矿业工程效益的讨论[J],中国矿业,2002(1),63-66
    [114]刘友芝,论负的外部性内在化的一般途径[J],经济评论,2003(3),7-10
    [115]Jose Pinera. Wealth Through Ownership:Creating Property Rights in Chilean mining[J]. Cato Journal.2004 (3).295-302.
    [116]苑二刚,日本企业密谋铁矿石价格陷阱[N],中国贸易报,20050303
    [117]日本钢铁产品进出口结构[N],中国冶金报,20050329
    [118]贾银松,中国国民经济发展情况与钢铁产业发展现状[N],中华工商时报,20050617
    [119]吴溪淳,制造业用钢需求[N],中国工业报,20050412
    [120]铁矿石生产成本进一步下降,矿业快讯,2001(10),14
    [121]杨大鹏, 中国与印度钢铁业相互吸引[N],经济参考报。20050531
    [122]中国海关统计(http://www1.cunstoms.gov.cn-2005.12进口重点商品量值)
    [123]张剑桥(译),世界铁矿石海运贸易到2010年可能接近9亿吨[J],太钢译文,2007(2),25
    [124]陈宇峰、陆晓燕,铜尾矿资源化的现状和展望[J],南通工学院学报,2004(4),60-62
    [125]卢辉畴,锌金共生矿综合回收研究与生产实践[J],矿产保护与利用,2007(4),23-25
    [126]张燕红,崔延遂,三道庄多金属共生矿综合利用浅析[J],矿产保护与利用,2003(6),27-31
    [127]张燕红.栾川钼矿白钨回收产业化前景[J].中国钨业,2002,(3)
    [128]陈忠典.栾川钼资源的开发利用和保护[J].中国钼业1998,(4
    [129]耿林、张志,我国非传统矿产资源的发展研究方向及建议[J],中国矿业,2006(12),5-7
    [130]王春宏、于跃进,关于矿产资源评价指标体系的探讨[J],中国国土资源经济,2008(3),35-37
    [131]期待更新的采矿技术[J],科技新时代,2008(11),9-9
    [132]王凤君/明茜, 中国冶金矿山企业协会理事长邹健[N]:21世纪经济报道,20050414
    [133]郭声琨 尚福山,中国有色金属矿业现状及发展[J],中国矿业,1999(5),23-26
    [134]Aaron Chaze, Local Companies Outbid Foreigners For Oil and Gas Exploration Rights [J], Global Finance,2005.10, Vol:19, Iss9,14
    [135]牛文元,可持续发展导论[M],北京:科学出版社,1997年11月
    [136]袁怀雨;陈晓莉;刘保顺,对制订《矿业权评估准则》的若干建议[J],中国国土资源经济2007(2),2-12

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700