巨工程项目冲击下移民的福利变迁、能力补偿和博弈分析
|
摘要
“巨工程项目”是指那些规模特别庞大、特别复杂而且社会影响巨大的建设项目。一方面，这些巨工程项目为满足人类生存和发展的需要，解决日趋复杂的社会问题，带动产业结构优化和升级，促进科技突破性发展，提升国家核心竞争力而存在，具有重要战略性地位和意义，另一方面，巨工程项目的兴建，也使得相当一部分人原有的生活体系、社会网络遭到破坏，陷入新的贫困和发展困境；同时，巨工程项目引发的社会资源和利益再分配也导致出现新的区域发展不平衡、不协调。
传统的观点认为，巨工程项目对所影响区域，特别是区域中人的发展造成的负面冲击影响是应付的代价和牺牲，可以被忽略。然而，无数事实已证明，这种“以物为中心，忽略项目与人相互关联的”巨工程项目观往往对巨工程项目自身的可持续发展造成严重障碍，并衍生其他严重的社会问题。当前，我国社会经济发展的宏观背景已发生重大变化：市场机制已成为调节相关行为主体的基本机制；可持续发展理念为人们广为接受，被视为是协调发展与资源环境矛盾、实现人类永续发展的唯一选择；建设一个更加公平、和谐的社会已经成为发展的基本目标。在这样的背景下，如何从工程哲学的高度更为全面、科学地认识巨工程项目的经济效应和社会责任，探讨将巨工程项目的冲击影响转变为可持续发展的契机，并对所涉及的公平补偿、区域协调、社会公平等问题进行深入地剖析，实现巨工程项目管理从“以物为中心”向“以人为中心”理念的转变和巨工程项目综合效应的最大化，无疑是一个值得研究的重要问题。
本文以具体的巨工程项目——南水北调中线工程为研究的切入点，在实地调查获取的数据基础上，从巨工程项目社会责任的视角，综合运用福利经济学、项目管理学、计量经济学、公共管理学、博弈论等理论和方法，从如下方面对上述问题进行了系统的研究。
1.提出和建构了“冲击—能力补偿—内生发展”的理论分析框架。本文认为，为人的可持续内生发展创造空间和提供支持，促进社会更加和谐，为社会的可持续发展创造更多可能正是巨工程项目建设的根本目的之一，也是巨工程项目社会责任、社会效应的主要体现。然而，由于巨工程项目的建设冲击，必将激烈、快速地降低相当部分非自愿移民群体的多重核心福利水平，这些核心福利维度，既包括经济福利，也包括许多重要的非经济福利，它们共同构成了非自愿移民群体可持续发展能力的基础。因此，相当部分非自愿移民群体之所以长久、持续的陷入贫困漩涡而无法自拔，其本质是因为巨工程项目的冲击使他们持续发展能力遭到严重的贬损。传统的，单纯输血式的一次性经济补偿只能短时间提升非自愿移民受损的经济福利，并不能使他们真正获得可持续的内生发展，所以效果往往差强人意。要使非自愿移民群体摆脱贫困，获得更好的发展，只有全面补偿和提升他们在巨工程项目冲击中受损的多重福利，即进行“能力补偿”才能真正使他们获得持续的内生发展。
2.基于阿马蒂亚森（Amartya Sen）的可行福利理论，从理论和实证两方面系统研究了巨工程项目冲击影响下非自愿移民群体多维福利的水平变化和结构分化。首先，在系统梳理和对比主观福利理论、客观福利理论、阿罗的不可能定律、可行能力福利理论等不同福利流派思想特点和异同的基础上，论证了阿马蒂亚森的以“功能”与“能力”概念为理论基石，通过相互关联的功能性活动集合来测度的可行福利理论分析框架为何能更适合本研究的特点。而后，根据阿特金森（Atkinson）的不平等测度原理、塞斯（S.Seth）的双参数构造理论等重构了多维福利测度模型，论证了集合次序对模型构造的重要意义，建构了新的具有“分布不均衡敏感”、“路径独立”特点的测度模型WZ和新的具有“分布不均衡敏感”、“交联敏感”特点的测度模型W1
Z
。进而，基于对南水北调中线迁徙区域移民群体的调查数据，实证定量研究了非自愿移民群体多维福利水平变化和福利分布结构变化的特点。
3.基于共赢的能力补偿。在探讨工程移民群体的能力补偿优化问题时，应以利益相关方共赢为目标，在保持社会整体福利优化的基础上进行讨论。因此，本文首先根据利益相关理论，对与补偿紧密关联的利益相关者进行界定和分类，然后基于社会整体福利优化的角度，从静态和动态两方面就补偿优化问题进行了理论探讨，并结合我国现实国情和非自愿移民群体特点，研究了如何对非自愿移民进行多维度的能力补偿，以及如何将这种能力补偿转化将为其内生可持续发展的具体对策和措施。
4.巨工程项目利益相关方的行为博弈、协调及管理体制改进。巨工程项目是涉及经济、社会、资源和环境等诸多方面的系统工程，在工程的规划、建设、实施和运营中，涉及到的利益攸关方众多。另一方面，多维的能力补偿方案，必将导致原有利益分配格局的改变，使得利益相关方之间进行利益再分配与再调整的博弈；重构巨工程项目的利益分享新机制。本文建构了市场机制下资源利益获取集团、资源利益输出集团、中央政府三个利益相关相关方静态和动态博弈模型，分析了博弈中各利益相关方的博弈行为，而后，基于参与式管理相关理论，建构了巨工程项目协商参与式管理基本模型框架，讨论了基于协商参与式的利益协调和管理机制创新问题。
"Giant project" refers to those particularly large scale, particularly complex andenormous social impact of the project. On the one hand, These giant projects to meet theneeds of human survival and development, to solve the increasingly complex socialissues, promote the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure, promotetechnological breakthrough to enhance the core competitiveness of the nationalexistence, has an important strategic position and significance. On the other hand, Sincethe construction of the giant project, but also makes a considerable part of the originalpeople living system, the social system is destroyed, poverty and development into anew dilemma; Meanwhile, the giant project triggered the redistribution of socialresources and interests also led to the emergence of new regional developmentunbalanced, uncoordinated.
The traditional view is that the giant project on the affected area, particularly theimpact of the negative impact caused by the development of regional human sacrifice isthe price and payable, can be ignored. However, many facts have proved that the"making object in the center, ignoring interrelated projects and people," the giantproject concept is often a serious obstacle to the sustainable development of the giantproject itself and derivatives other serious social problems. Currently, China's social andeconomic development of the macro context has changed significantly: the marketmechanism has become a basic mechanism for regulating the relevant actors;sustainable development concept is widely accepted, is regarded as the coordinateddevelopment of the environment and resource conflicts, human beings can achieve theonly choice for sustainable development; building a more equitable and harmonioussociety has become a basic objective of development. In this context, how to more fullyfrom the height of philosophical, scientific understanding of the economic effects of thegiant projects and social responsibility, to explore the effects of the giant impactsustainable development projects into an opportunity, and fair compensation, regionalcoordination, to study the issue of social justice, etc., to achieve the giant projectmanagement from the "object-centric" to "people-centered" philosophy of change is animportant issue worthy of study.
In this paper, the giant concrete projects-North Water Transfer Project as astarting point the study, the data obtained on the basis of field surveys, the giant projectfrom the perspective of social responsibility, the integrated use of Welfare Economics, Project Management, Econometrics, Public Administration Science, Game Theory andother theories and methods from the following aspects of these issues have been studiedsystem.
1. Proposed and constructed a "Shock-Ability-Endogenous Development"theory analysis framework. This paper argues that human create space for sustainableendogenous development and to provide support and promote social harmony andcreate more likely it is one of the fundamental purpose of the giant construction projectsfor the sustainable development of society, but also the giant project of socialresponsibility, social effects mainly reflected. However, due to the impact of the giantconstruction projects, will intense, rapid reduction in the level of benefits aconsiderable part of the multi-core engineering involuntary immigrant groups, thesecore welfare, both economic benefits, but also includes many important non-economicbenefits, which together form the basis of involuntary immigrant groups engineeringsustainable development capacity. Thus, a considerable part of the reason for theinvoluntary immigrant groups long, sustained poverty whirlpool and can not extricatethemselves, the nature of the project because of the impact of huge ability to makethem sustainable development was severely derogatory. Traditional, simple transfusion-style short-time economic compensation can only enhance the involuntaryresettlement damaged economic welfare, does not make them truly achieve sustainableendogenous development, so the results are often unsatisfactory. To make involuntaryimmigrant groups out of poverty, access to better development, only a comprehensivecompensation and enhance their impact damaged the giant project in multiple benefits,namely " the ability to compensate," so that they can really achieve sustainedendogenous development.
2. Based on Amartya Sen’s Viable Welfare Theory, both from the theoretical andempirical aspects of the system to study the impact of the giant project engineeringinvoluntary immigrant groups under welfare changes. First, on the basis of SubjectiveWelfare Theory, Objective Welfare Theory, Arrow’s Impossible Welfare benefits,Amartya Sen’s Viable Welfare Theory, proved to Amartya Sen’s "feature "and" ability"concept is the cornerstone of the theory to measure through functional activitiesinterrelated set of feasible multidimensional welfare theoretical framework to better fitthe characteristics of why this study. Then, based on the principle of Atkinson'sinequality measure, Seth's two-parameter constructor theory reconstructed welfaremeasure model, demonstrate the importance of the collection order for the modelstructure, with construction of a new "uneven distribution sensitive","path independent" measure model and new features with the "uneven distribution ofsensitive,""cross-linked sensitive" measure model characteristics. Furthermore, basedon survey data migration to North Water Transfer area immigrant groups, empiricalquantitative study of involuntary multidimensional welfare level changes and thedistribution of welfare changes in structural engineering characteristics of immigrantgroups.
3. Based on the ability to compensate for the best overall social welfareoptimization. In discussing the ability to compensate for engineering optimizationproblems immigrant groups should be win-win for the target stakeholders to discussmaintaining optimal overall social welfare on the basis of. Therefore, this paper basedon stakeholder theory, and compensation is closely related to the interests ofstakeholders to define and classify, and then based on the best overall social welfarepoint of view, from both the static and dynamic aspects of the optimization problemdiscussed on compensation theory, and then combined the actual situation in ourcountry and involuntary immigrant groups engineering features, the ability tocompensate for how to study the works of involuntary immigrants multi-dimensional,and how this will be its ability to compensate for the conversion of specific policies andmeasures for sustainable endogenous development.
4. Behavior giant project stakeholders game, coordination and managementsystem improvements. Giant project is a systems engineering project involving manyaspects of economic, social, and environmental resources in the planning, construction,implementation and operation of the project, involving many stakeholders. On the otherhand, the ability to multi-dimensional compensation scheme will lead to changes in thepattern of the original distribution of benefits, so as to perform the redistribution andre-adjustment of interest among stakeholders game; reconstruction interests of giantprojects to share new mechanism. This paper constructs the resources to obtain benefitsunder the market mechanism group, resource interests output group, the centralgovernment of the three stakeholders stakeholders static and dynamic game model toanalyze the game behavior of all stakeholders in the game, and then, based on the theoryof participatory management construct a giant project management basic model ofparticipatory consultation framework to discuss the benefits of coordination andconsultation mechanisms for innovation in participatory management based.
传统的观点认为，巨工程项目对所影响区域，特别是区域中人的发展造成的负面冲击影响是应付的代价和牺牲，可以被忽略。然而，无数事实已证明，这种“以物为中心，忽略项目与人相互关联的”巨工程项目观往往对巨工程项目自身的可持续发展造成严重障碍，并衍生其他严重的社会问题。当前，我国社会经济发展的宏观背景已发生重大变化：市场机制已成为调节相关行为主体的基本机制；可持续发展理念为人们广为接受，被视为是协调发展与资源环境矛盾、实现人类永续发展的唯一选择；建设一个更加公平、和谐的社会已经成为发展的基本目标。在这样的背景下，如何从工程哲学的高度更为全面、科学地认识巨工程项目的经济效应和社会责任，探讨将巨工程项目的冲击影响转变为可持续发展的契机，并对所涉及的公平补偿、区域协调、社会公平等问题进行深入地剖析，实现巨工程项目管理从“以物为中心”向“以人为中心”理念的转变和巨工程项目综合效应的最大化，无疑是一个值得研究的重要问题。
本文以具体的巨工程项目——南水北调中线工程为研究的切入点，在实地调查获取的数据基础上，从巨工程项目社会责任的视角，综合运用福利经济学、项目管理学、计量经济学、公共管理学、博弈论等理论和方法，从如下方面对上述问题进行了系统的研究。
1.提出和建构了“冲击—能力补偿—内生发展”的理论分析框架。本文认为，为人的可持续内生发展创造空间和提供支持，促进社会更加和谐，为社会的可持续发展创造更多可能正是巨工程项目建设的根本目的之一，也是巨工程项目社会责任、社会效应的主要体现。然而，由于巨工程项目的建设冲击，必将激烈、快速地降低相当部分非自愿移民群体的多重核心福利水平，这些核心福利维度，既包括经济福利，也包括许多重要的非经济福利，它们共同构成了非自愿移民群体可持续发展能力的基础。因此，相当部分非自愿移民群体之所以长久、持续的陷入贫困漩涡而无法自拔，其本质是因为巨工程项目的冲击使他们持续发展能力遭到严重的贬损。传统的，单纯输血式的一次性经济补偿只能短时间提升非自愿移民受损的经济福利，并不能使他们真正获得可持续的内生发展，所以效果往往差强人意。要使非自愿移民群体摆脱贫困，获得更好的发展，只有全面补偿和提升他们在巨工程项目冲击中受损的多重福利，即进行“能力补偿”才能真正使他们获得持续的内生发展。
2.基于阿马蒂亚森（Amartya Sen）的可行福利理论，从理论和实证两方面系统研究了巨工程项目冲击影响下非自愿移民群体多维福利的水平变化和结构分化。首先，在系统梳理和对比主观福利理论、客观福利理论、阿罗的不可能定律、可行能力福利理论等不同福利流派思想特点和异同的基础上，论证了阿马蒂亚森的以“功能”与“能力”概念为理论基石，通过相互关联的功能性活动集合来测度的可行福利理论分析框架为何能更适合本研究的特点。而后，根据阿特金森（Atkinson）的不平等测度原理、塞斯（S.Seth）的双参数构造理论等重构了多维福利测度模型，论证了集合次序对模型构造的重要意义，建构了新的具有“分布不均衡敏感”、“路径独立”特点的测度模型WZ和新的具有“分布不均衡敏感”、“交联敏感”特点的测度模型W1
Z
。进而，基于对南水北调中线迁徙区域移民群体的调查数据，实证定量研究了非自愿移民群体多维福利水平变化和福利分布结构变化的特点。
3.基于共赢的能力补偿。在探讨工程移民群体的能力补偿优化问题时，应以利益相关方共赢为目标，在保持社会整体福利优化的基础上进行讨论。因此，本文首先根据利益相关理论，对与补偿紧密关联的利益相关者进行界定和分类，然后基于社会整体福利优化的角度，从静态和动态两方面就补偿优化问题进行了理论探讨，并结合我国现实国情和非自愿移民群体特点，研究了如何对非自愿移民进行多维度的能力补偿，以及如何将这种能力补偿转化将为其内生可持续发展的具体对策和措施。
4.巨工程项目利益相关方的行为博弈、协调及管理体制改进。巨工程项目是涉及经济、社会、资源和环境等诸多方面的系统工程，在工程的规划、建设、实施和运营中，涉及到的利益攸关方众多。另一方面，多维的能力补偿方案，必将导致原有利益分配格局的改变，使得利益相关方之间进行利益再分配与再调整的博弈；重构巨工程项目的利益分享新机制。本文建构了市场机制下资源利益获取集团、资源利益输出集团、中央政府三个利益相关相关方静态和动态博弈模型，分析了博弈中各利益相关方的博弈行为，而后，基于参与式管理相关理论，建构了巨工程项目协商参与式管理基本模型框架，讨论了基于协商参与式的利益协调和管理机制创新问题。
"Giant project" refers to those particularly large scale, particularly complex andenormous social impact of the project. On the one hand, These giant projects to meet theneeds of human survival and development, to solve the increasingly complex socialissues, promote the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure, promotetechnological breakthrough to enhance the core competitiveness of the nationalexistence, has an important strategic position and significance. On the other hand, Sincethe construction of the giant project, but also makes a considerable part of the originalpeople living system, the social system is destroyed, poverty and development into anew dilemma; Meanwhile, the giant project triggered the redistribution of socialresources and interests also led to the emergence of new regional developmentunbalanced, uncoordinated.
The traditional view is that the giant project on the affected area, particularly theimpact of the negative impact caused by the development of regional human sacrifice isthe price and payable, can be ignored. However, many facts have proved that the"making object in the center, ignoring interrelated projects and people," the giantproject concept is often a serious obstacle to the sustainable development of the giantproject itself and derivatives other serious social problems. Currently, China's social andeconomic development of the macro context has changed significantly: the marketmechanism has become a basic mechanism for regulating the relevant actors;sustainable development concept is widely accepted, is regarded as the coordinateddevelopment of the environment and resource conflicts, human beings can achieve theonly choice for sustainable development; building a more equitable and harmonioussociety has become a basic objective of development. In this context, how to more fullyfrom the height of philosophical, scientific understanding of the economic effects of thegiant projects and social responsibility, to explore the effects of the giant impactsustainable development projects into an opportunity, and fair compensation, regionalcoordination, to study the issue of social justice, etc., to achieve the giant projectmanagement from the "object-centric" to "people-centered" philosophy of change is animportant issue worthy of study.
In this paper, the giant concrete projects-North Water Transfer Project as astarting point the study, the data obtained on the basis of field surveys, the giant projectfrom the perspective of social responsibility, the integrated use of Welfare Economics, Project Management, Econometrics, Public Administration Science, Game Theory andother theories and methods from the following aspects of these issues have been studiedsystem.
1. Proposed and constructed a "Shock-Ability-Endogenous Development"theory analysis framework. This paper argues that human create space for sustainableendogenous development and to provide support and promote social harmony andcreate more likely it is one of the fundamental purpose of the giant construction projectsfor the sustainable development of society, but also the giant project of socialresponsibility, social effects mainly reflected. However, due to the impact of the giantconstruction projects, will intense, rapid reduction in the level of benefits aconsiderable part of the multi-core engineering involuntary immigrant groups, thesecore welfare, both economic benefits, but also includes many important non-economicbenefits, which together form the basis of involuntary immigrant groups engineeringsustainable development capacity. Thus, a considerable part of the reason for theinvoluntary immigrant groups long, sustained poverty whirlpool and can not extricatethemselves, the nature of the project because of the impact of huge ability to makethem sustainable development was severely derogatory. Traditional, simple transfusion-style short-time economic compensation can only enhance the involuntaryresettlement damaged economic welfare, does not make them truly achieve sustainableendogenous development, so the results are often unsatisfactory. To make involuntaryimmigrant groups out of poverty, access to better development, only a comprehensivecompensation and enhance their impact damaged the giant project in multiple benefits,namely " the ability to compensate," so that they can really achieve sustainedendogenous development.
2. Based on Amartya Sen’s Viable Welfare Theory, both from the theoretical andempirical aspects of the system to study the impact of the giant project engineeringinvoluntary immigrant groups under welfare changes. First, on the basis of SubjectiveWelfare Theory, Objective Welfare Theory, Arrow’s Impossible Welfare benefits,Amartya Sen’s Viable Welfare Theory, proved to Amartya Sen’s "feature "and" ability"concept is the cornerstone of the theory to measure through functional activitiesinterrelated set of feasible multidimensional welfare theoretical framework to better fitthe characteristics of why this study. Then, based on the principle of Atkinson'sinequality measure, Seth's two-parameter constructor theory reconstructed welfaremeasure model, demonstrate the importance of the collection order for the modelstructure, with construction of a new "uneven distribution sensitive","path independent" measure model and new features with the "uneven distribution ofsensitive,""cross-linked sensitive" measure model characteristics. Furthermore, basedon survey data migration to North Water Transfer area immigrant groups, empiricalquantitative study of involuntary multidimensional welfare level changes and thedistribution of welfare changes in structural engineering characteristics of immigrantgroups.
3. Based on the ability to compensate for the best overall social welfareoptimization. In discussing the ability to compensate for engineering optimizationproblems immigrant groups should be win-win for the target stakeholders to discussmaintaining optimal overall social welfare on the basis of. Therefore, this paper basedon stakeholder theory, and compensation is closely related to the interests ofstakeholders to define and classify, and then based on the best overall social welfarepoint of view, from both the static and dynamic aspects of the optimization problemdiscussed on compensation theory, and then combined the actual situation in ourcountry and involuntary immigrant groups engineering features, the ability tocompensate for how to study the works of involuntary immigrants multi-dimensional,and how this will be its ability to compensate for the conversion of specific policies andmeasures for sustainable endogenous development.
4. Behavior giant project stakeholders game, coordination and managementsystem improvements. Giant project is a systems engineering project involving manyaspects of economic, social, and environmental resources in the planning, construction,implementation and operation of the project, involving many stakeholders. On the otherhand, the ability to multi-dimensional compensation scheme will lead to changes in thepattern of the original distribution of benefits, so as to perform the redistribution andre-adjustment of interest among stakeholders game; reconstruction interests of giantprojects to share new mechanism. This paper constructs the resources to obtain benefitsunder the market mechanism group, resource interests output group, the centralgovernment of the three stakeholders stakeholders static and dynamic game model toanalyze the game behavior of all stakeholders in the game, and then, based on the theoryof participatory management construct a giant project management basic model ofparticipatory consultation framework to discuss the benefits of coordination andconsultation mechanisms for innovation in participatory management based.
引文
安虎森,邹璇.2005.“产权置换”与大型工程移民补偿问题——以三峡库区移民为例[J].管理世界,(11):93~100.
贝克尔.1987.人力资本[M].北京大学出版社.
曹磊,孟宪和.2010.北京奥运会项目群整合计划管理[J].项目研究,(7):9-16.
陈绍军.2003.施国庆.中国非自愿移民的贫困分析[J].甘肃社会科学,(5):14-20.
程静.2004.风险投资项目及其利益相关者研究[J].科技管理研究(5):44-45.
段跃芳.2007.开发性移民政策、概念框架、应用及发展[J].江汉论坛,(7):131-134.
樊万选.2006.南水北调中线水源区污染防治与生态环境保护研究[J].环境保护,(1):64-68.
丰景春.2005.大中型调水工程运作与管理体制[J].中国投资,(10):110-113.
风笑天.2008.安置方式、人际交往与移民适应——江苏、浙江343户三峡农村移民的比较研究[J].社会,(2):152-161.
风笑天.2006.落地生根：三峡农村移民的社会适应[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社.
封光寅,李身渝,林云发.2006.南水北调中线水源区水环境变化趋势分析[J].人民黄河,(8):44-45..
峰强,陶传进.2002.工程移民的性质定位兼与其他移民类型的比较J].江苏社会科学,(6):76-80.
冯江.2003.四川水资源开发项目的社会评价研究[D].西南交通大学硕士论文.
冯彦,何大明等.2000.澜沧江一湄公河水资源公平合理分配模式分析[J].自然资源学报,15(3):241-245
扶玉枝,朱磊.2007.家庭特征对衣户兼业经营的影响分析[J].广东商学院学报,(4):80-83.
付保红,陈丽晖,朱彤.2004.云南高山峡谷区大型水电站建设开发性移民研究——以漫湾、大朝山电站为例[J].地域研究与开发,(12):111-14.
傅湘.1999.区域水资源承载力综合评价,长江流域资源与环境[J],8(2):168-172.
高更和,管华.2002.南水北调中线工程源头区水土流失及其治理[J].水土保持通报,(3):65-68.
高进云,乔荣锋,张安录.2007.农地城市流转前后农户福利变化的模糊评价—基于森的可行能力理论[J].管理世界,(6):45-55.
高文艺.2003.世界各国的调水工程,世界地理[J],(4):1~20.
管驰明,姚士谋,陆树.2003.基于全球区位论的城市发展研究:以江苏省南通市为例[J].人文地理,(8):69-74.
郭菊娥,邢公奇,何建武.2003.黄河流域水资源价格与总产值变动的波及效应分析[J].水利经济.(9):42-45.
郭庆汉.2002.南水北调:十堰经济发展的重要机遇[J].武汉交通管理干部学院学报,(4):40-46.
郭秀锐等.2003..城市生态足迹计算与分析——以广州为例[J].地理研究,(5):654-662.
国家计委投资研究所、建设部标准定额研究所社会评价课题组.1997.投资项目社会评价指南[M].北京:经济管理出版社.
国务院.2005南水北调工程建设征地补偿和移民安置暂行办法..
韩传春.2004.第三经济主体[M].太原:山西经济出版社.
韩宇平,阮本清.2003.区域水安全评价指标体系初步研究[J].环境科学学报,23(2):267-272.
韩振燕.2006.水库移民迁移前后人力资本变化实证分析——温州珊溪水库移民案例研究[J].技术经济,(3):49-53.
郝永红,李绒,周海潮,黄登宇.2004.山西省可持续发展的灰色综合评估[J].经济地理.,(3);17-20.
郝志平.2004.高速公路社会效益评价指标体系分析研究[J].辽宁交通科技,(7):90-91.
何爱平.2005.区域经济可持续发展导论[M].经济科学出版社.
何继善,王孟均.2008.工程与工程管理的哲学思考[J].中国工程科学.10(3):9-10.
何晓光.2004.南水北调工程调水期的社会发展影响[J].水利发展研究.(4):15-19.
何雪松,黄富强,曾守锤.2010.城乡迁移与精神健康:基于上海的实证研究[J].社会学研究,(1):111-129.
贺寨平.2001.国外社会支持网研究综述[J].国外社会科学,(1):76-82.
胡枫.2007.中国农村劳动力转移的研究:一个文献综述[J].浙江社会科学,(1):201-209.
胡静,杨云彦.2009.大型工程非自愿移民的人力资本失灵——对南水北调中线工程的实证分析[J].经济评论,(4):74~80.
胡荣.2003.社会经济地位与网络资源[J].社会学研究.(5):50-58.
华金阿朗戈.2001.移民研究的评析[J].国际社会科学杂志,(3).23-28.
黄朝永,顾朝林,甄峰.2000.江苏可持续发展能力评价J].经济地理,(5):43-46.
黄海燕.2004.发展项目的公众参与研究[D].南京:河海大学博士论文.
黄河.2002.引黄入晋工程太原供水区水价问题的思考[J].中国水利.(5):80.
黄贤全.2002.美国政府对田纳西河流域的开发,西南师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）[J],(7):46-51.
黄晓波,张喜峰.2007.广西个人社会网络资源状况及改进对策[J].广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,(6):124-128.
黄晓荣,汪党献,裴源生.2005.宁夏国民经济用水投入产出分析[J].资源科学,(3):135-139.
黄有光著,唐翔译.2005.社会福社与经济政策[M].北京:北京人学出版社.
恢晓薇等.2006.本国生态足迹指标的构建及其实证研究[J].东北大学学报（自然科学版）,(10):150-153.
彗姆斯. C.斯科特.2004.王晓毅译.国家的视角——那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的[M].北京:中国社会科学文献出版社.
贾柏富等.2006.水利工程管理体制改革的探讨[J].东北水利水电,(5):65-66.
贾生华,陈宏辉.2002.利益相关者的界定方法述评[J].外国经济与管理,(5)13-18.
荆善馄,李贵宝.2003.南水北调工程的巨大综合效益[J].南水北调与水利科技,(12):40-42.
孔令强,施国庆.2008.水电工程农村移民入股安置模式初探[J].长江流域资源与环境,(3):185-188.
孔令强.2006.易地开发性移民扶贫及其效益评价指标体系[J].学术交流,(7):75~77.
李晶等.水权与水价——国外经验研究与中国改革方向探讨[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2003.
李景华,陈锡康.2004.长江流域片水利投入占用产出分析[J].长江科学院院报,(2):44-47.
李利锋,郑度.2002.区域可持续发展评价:进展与展望J].地理科学进展,(3):237-248.
李林红,介俊,吴莉明.2001.昆明市环境保护投入产出表的多目标规划模型[J].昆明理工大学学报,(1):102-109.
李林红.2002.滇池流域可持续发展投入产出系统动力学模型[J].系统工程理论与实践.(8):89-94.
李明,王清,吴大千,王仁卿.2001.基于真实储蓄方法的招远市的可持续发展能力评价[J].山东大学学报,(9):56-60.
李培林,张翼.2003.走出生活逆境的阴影——失业下岗职工再就业中的“人力资本失灵”研究[J].中国社会科学,(5):85-101.
李强,陶传进.2000.工程移民的性质定位兼与其它移民类型比较[J].江苏社会科学,(11):76-80.
李强.2001.社会支持与青年下岗职工心理健康[J].青年研究,(7):12-17.
李强.2004.农民工与中国社会分层[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社.
李瑞,李永文.2004.南水北调中线工程与南阳旅游业发展前瞻[J].地域研究与开发,(2):65-68.
李润虎,张稳柱.1992.太原市水资源与国民经济投入产出模型[J],水利经济,(4):38-44.
李善同,许新宜.2004.南水北调与中国发展[M].北京:经济科学出版社.
李双成.2001.中国可持续发展水平区域差异的人工神经网络判定[J].经济地理,(9):523-526.
李小云.2001.参与式概论[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社.
李晓云.2007.农民工流动动因及特点研究综述[J].陕西行政学院学报,21(3):32-35.
李新安.2003.中国区域利益冲突及经济协调发展问题研究[D].南京:河海大学.
李雪松.2002.南水北调工程中的公平与效率问题J].地域研究与开发,(2):81-84.
李益民.2006.南水北调中线工程水源区基于舍理经济开发的环境保护[J].南阳师范学院学报,(9):55-57.
梁子安,李玉英,胡兰群等.2006..南水北调中线水源区生态监测及其瀛营养化评价[J].河南师范大学学报.(8):175-178.
廖蔚.2006.水库移民经济沦[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社.
赵长运.2003.南水北调（中线）工程库区移民安置方式及政策建议[J].南阳师范学院学报.(3):72-74.
林东升.2005..农民增收途径的政策分析[J].农村经济,(11):50-51.
林毅夫.2002.解决农村贫困问题需要有新的战略思路[J].北京大学学报.
刘传江,徐建玲.2006.利益补偿与分享机制缺失下的政策失效问题探讨[J].经济评论,(4):54-58.
刘汉桂,牵大为.2003.南水北调——北京可持续发展的支撑工程[J].北京水利,(4):5-6.
刘建必等.2005.中国经济发展与生态足迹的关系研究[J].资源科学,(3):33-39.
刘军.2004.社会网络分析导论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社.
刘凌波.2003.我国政府行为的博弈分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,(1):26-30.
刘爽.2005.试论消除能力贫困与西部大开发J].中国人口科学,(5):46-51.
刘新建.1997.国民经济动态投入占用产出分析的理论与方法研秃[J].系统工程学报,(1):40-48.
刘长生,郭小东,简玉峰.2008.社会福利指数、政府支出规模及其结构优化[J].公共管理学报,(3):91-99.
刘振,雷洪.1999.三峡移民在社会适应中的心态[J].人口研究,(2):19-27.
龙爱华等.2001..我国水资源管理中的行政分割问题与对策[J].中国软科学,(8):17-21.
卢双宝.2002.南水北调工程建设对河北经挤的拉动作用[J].甫水北调与水利科技,(2):11-15.
芦松菡.2007.区域发展综合测评标度:GDP、GGDP到MDP [J].科学教育研究,(2):100-101.
陆佑楣.2008.大型工程项目管理存在的主要问题[J].建筑经济,(6):5-7.
陆远权.2002.浅析三峡库区移民过渡期的贫困问题[J].人口与经济,(2).
罗本成,原魁,稚凌等.2002.基于灰关联度评价的投资决策模型及应用.系统工程理论与实践,(9):132-136.
罗利民,王超,顾强生,谢能刚.2006.基于投入产出分析法的节水经济效益分析[J].水利经济,(3):17-19.
马德峰.2002.影响三峡外迁农村移民社区适应性的客观因素——来自江苏省大丰市首批三峡移民的调查[J].管理世界,(10):43-50.
马骏,郑垂勇.2006.南水北调工程企业化管理浅议[J].水利经济,(4):58-60.
迈克尔.M.塞尼.1996.移民与发展——世界银行移民政策与经验研究[M].河海大学出版社.
迈克尔.M.塞尼.1998.把人放在首位一投资项目社会分析[M].北京:中国计划出版社.
毛汉英.1996.山东省可持续发展指标体系初步研究口[J].地理研究,(41):16-23.
闵庆文,李文华.2002.区域可持续发展能力评价及其在山东五莲的应用[J].生态学报,(6):7-9.
倪红珍,王浩,汪党献,张庆华.2006.基于水资源绿色核算的北京市水价[J],水利学报,(2):210-217.
倪红珍,王洁,汪党献.2004.产业部门的用水性质分析[J].水利水电技术,(5):91-94.
聂鑫,汪晗,郭洁雯,张安录2010.微观福利视角下的库区移民搬迁意愿调查[J].中国人口,资源与环境,(9):159-164.
聂华林,李秀红.2001.区际公平与区域经济可持续发展[J].甘肃社会科学,(5):30-31.
牛树海,秦耀辰.2002.区域可持续发展中的生态空间占用法理论研究[J].河南大学学报（自然科学版）,(4):65-70.
牛振国,崔伟宏.2006.面向区域可持续发展的信息特征分类[J].中国人口、资源与环境.(2):32-36.
潘家华.1994.三峡投资的社会评价及其政策涵义[J].江汉论坛,(8):63-68.
潘玉君等.2002.“区域可持续发展”概念的试定义[J].中国人口·资源与环境,(4):127-129.
戚杰等.2004.区域环境——经济系统的动态仿真——以南水北调后的湖北省襄樊市为例[J].系统工程理沦与实践,(3):107-113.
綦淑娟.1996.政府和农民互动关系的分析[J].社会学研究,(4).51-60.
乔家君.2004.改进的熵值法在河南省可持续发展能力评估中的应用广[J].资源科学,(1):113-119.
任宏.2001.巨工程项目管理[M].科学出版社.
施国庆,陈阿江.1999.工程移民中的社会学问题探讨[J].河海大学学报,(4):19-27.
施国庆.2002.移民学探讨.移民和社会发展国际研讨会论文集[M].
石智雷,杨云彦.2009.非自愿移民经济恢复的影响因素分析——三峡库区与丹江口库区移民比较研究[J].人口研究,(33):72-80.
石智雷,杨云彦,田艳平.2011.非自愿移民经济再发展:基于人力资本的分析[J].中国软科学,(3):115-127.
世界银行.1996.开发项目中的非自愿移民:技术文件[M],水利出版社.
世界银行.2000.世界银行资助项目中的非自愿移民实施政策说明OD4.30[M],水利出版社.
世界银行.1992.世界银行资助项目中的非自愿移民实施政策说明OPN10.08[M],水利出版社.
世界银行.1992.世界银行资助项目中的非自愿移民运行导册[M].水利出版社
舒尔茨.1996.论人力资本投资[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社.
孙田野,马才学,郭洁雯.2011.基于Logit模型的非自愿性移民迁徙分析[J].中国人口,资源与环境,(1):110~114.
陶传进.2000.工程移民搬迁动力分析框架[J].社会学研究,(6):105~111.
王伟,赵远翔,桂威.2013.缅甸伊江上游水电开发移民安置规划探索[J].人民长江,(1):46~53.
王忠伟.2005.大型工程的资源优化[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社.
翁定军.2005.冲突的策略——以S市三峡移民的生活适应为例[J].社会,(2):112-136.
吴隽、张剑英、任丽娟.2005.基于证据推理与粗级理论的供应链合作伙伴选择方法研究.中国软科学,(3):130-133.
徐烽烽,李放,唐焱.2010.苏南农户土地承包经营权置换城镇社会保障前后福利变化的模糊评价[J].中国农村经济,(8):67-79.
杨文键.2004.中国水库农村移民安置模式研究[M].云南美术出版社.
杨云彦,徐映梅等.2008.社会变迁、介入型贫困与能力再造——基于南水北调库区移民的研究[J].管理世界,(11):89-98.
叶嘉国、雷洪.2000.三峡移民对经济发展的适应性[J].中国人口科学,(6):55-60.
叶甚强,吴莉等.2001.区域可持续发展的技术创新与制度创新机制研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,(3):33-36.
易朝路,任晓华.2001.许厚泽.重大工程建设对湖北省产业布局的影响与调整[J].华中师范大学学报（自然科学舨）,(9):349-352.
尹睹波.2003.区域可持续菠器的生态安全评价[J].数量经济技术经济研究,(97):139-144.
尹奇,马璐璐,王庆日.2010.基于森的功能和能力福利理论的失地农民福利水平评价[J].中国土地科学,(7):41-46.
尹树赋.巢礼义,冯发林.2005.湖南省农业内在特征与水资源.:≮效利用模式[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,(4):80-84.
应星.2001.大河移民上访的故事[M].三联书店.
于冷,戴有息.2000.吉林省水资源投入产出分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,(2):136-140.
于谦,高萍.2011.中国农村社会福利指数的构造及实测研究[J].中国农村经济,7(2):63-71.
余文学,高渭文等.2000.水库移民问题的社会经济分析[J].河海大学学报.
元相虎,李华等.2005.基于生态足迹模型中国可持续发展动态分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境.(3):38-42.
袁俊森.2004.水利工程经济[M].中国水利水电出版.
袁睁,韩沛.2006.南水北凋中线丹江口库区及汇水支流水质现状与污染防治对策[J].水资源与水工程学报,(4):50-53.
岳东霞.2004.甘肃省生态足迹和生态承载力发展趋势研究[J].西北植物学报,(3):454-463.
阅克菲.2006.源头活水清清几许一一来自南水北调中线水源区的调[J].环境保护,(3):33-37.
张绍山,张东晓.1997.施国庆.中国水库移民综述.世界银行贷款项目水库移民研讨会文集[C].
张绍山.1992.水库移民的“次生贫困”及其对策初探[J].水利经济.
张绍山.2006.中国水工程移民补偿机制发展与改革[J].水利水电科技进展,(3):1-6.
张维迎.1996.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社.(5)397-445.
张文,尹继东.2006.我国中部农村劳动力转移影响因素的实证分析[J].江西社会科学.(6):28.
张文宏.1996,阮丹青,潘允康.天津农村居民的社会网[J].社会学研究,(2):108-119.
张学文.2002.区域可持续发展的调控及其对策研究[J].学术交流,(3):95-98.
张郁,邓伟.2006.基于投入产出模型的吉林省水资源经济效益分析[J].东北师大学报（自然科学版）,(3):133-137.
赵锋,杨云彦.2009.外力冲击下水库移民生计脆弱性及其解决机制——以南水北调中线工程库区为例[J].人口与经济,(4):1-7.
郑远红.20006.关于农民增收途径的实证分析[J].农业经济(2):56-57.
中共湖北省委宣传部等.2006..湖北新农村建设的思路与对策[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社.
中国环境年鉴编辑委员会编.2003.中国环境年鉴:[M].北京:中国环境年鉴编辑委员会年鉴社.
周甲禄,黄艳,吴植.2011.南水北调工程的“世界之最”[N/OL].新华网,Http://News.Xinhuanet.Com/Energy/2011-12/20/C_122452944.Htm.
朱东恺.2004.投资项目利益相关者管理探析[J].理论与改革,(1):92-93.
American Society of Civil Engineers.2002. Architectural Wonders of The World's Top Ten In20thCentury[J]. Michael Cernea. Washington D. C.
Anand S, Sen A.2000, The Income Component of The Human Development Index [J]. Journal ofHuman Development and Capabilities,1(1):83–106.
Anthony B. Atkinson and Bourguignon F.1982. The Comparison of Multidimensioned Distributionof Economic Status [J]. Review of Economic Studies,(49):183–201,
Anthony B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon.1987. Income Distribution and Differences In Needs[M].Macmillan Press, London.
Atkinson,A.B. and Bourguignon,F.1982. The Comparison of Multi-Dimensioned Distributions ofEconomic Status [J]. Review of Economic Studies, Vol.49(2):183–201.
Bebbington A. J.1997. Social Capital and Rural Intensification: Local Organizations and Islands ofSustainability In The Rural andes [J]. The Geographic Journal,163(2):189~197.
Bourguignon F, Chakravarty S R.2011. The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty[J]. Journalof Economic Inequality,(1)25-49.
Bratt R.2002. Housing and Family Well-Being[J]. Housing Studies,14(1):13-26.
Chris De Wet.2002. Improving Outcomes In Development—Induced Displacement andResettlement (DIDR) Projects[J]. Forced Migration Review.(12).
Davenport T. O.1999. Human Capital: What Is It and Why People Invest It[M].. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Dutta, I., Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y.2003. On Measuring Deprivation and The Standard of LivingIn A Multidimensional Framework On The Basis of Aggregate Data[J]. Economica,(278):197–221.
Elena Bardasi, Stephen Jenkins, and John A. Rigg. Documentation.2001.For Derived Current andAnnual Net Household Income Variables, BHPS Waves1-9[M]. Mimeo,University of Essex,
Esfandiar Maasoumi.1986. The Measurement and Decomposition of Multi-DimensionalInequality[J]. Econometrica,(4):991–997.
Esfandiar Maasoumi.2004. Composite Indices of Income and Other Developmental Indicators: AGeneral Approach. Research On Economic Inequality[J], Economica,(1):269–286.
Foster J, Shorrocks.2000.A. Subgroup Consistent Poverty Indices [J]. Econometrica,59(3):687–709.
Francois Bourguignon and Satya R..1999. Chakravarty. A Family of Multidimensional PovertyMeasures. In D. Slottje, Editor, Advances In Econometrics, Income Distribution andMethodology of Science[M]. Springer Verlag, London.
Francois Bourguignon and Satya R. Chakravarty.2003. The Measurement of MultidimensionalPoverty[J]. Journal of Economic Inequality.
Hicks D.1997. The Inequality Adjusted Human Development Index: A Constructive Proposal[J].World Development,25(8):83–98.
Jac. L.A.Geurts, Cisca Joldersma..2001. Methodology For Participatory Policy Analysis[J].Europe Journal of Operational Research,67-70.
Joereskog K. G..2001. Analysis of Ordinal Variables2: Cross-Sectional Data[M]. Mimeo, SSIWebsite.
Joereskog K. G. and Goldberger.1975. Estimation of A Model With Multiple Indicators andMultiples Causes of A Single Latent Variable[J]. Journal of The American StatisticalAssociation,70:637–639.
Joseph G. Hirschberg, Esfandiar Maasoumi, and Daniel J. Slottje.2000. Clusters of Attributes andWell-Being In The USA[M]. Journal of Applied Econometrics,(16):445–460,
Klugman, J., F. Rodriguez, and H. J. Choi.2011. The HDI2010: New Controversies, OldCritiques[M]. UNDP–HDRO, New York.
Klugman, J., Rodriguez F., and H. J. Choi.2011. The HDI2010: New Controversies, OldCritiques[M]. UNDP–HDRO, New York.
Kolm, S.-C.1977. Multidimensional Equalitarianisms[J],. Quarterly Journal of Economics,91(1),1.13.
Lancaster K.1966.. A New Approach to Consumer Theory[J]. Journal of Political Economy,74:132–157.
Lin Nan.2000. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action [M]. Cambridge UniversityPress.
Mathur H. M.1995.The Resettlement of People Displaced By Development Projects Issues andApproaches, Development, Displacement and Resettlement: Focus On Asian Experiences[M].Vikas Publishing House,(5):15~38.
Michael M. Cernea.1988. Involuntary Resettlement and Development: Some Projects Have AdverseSocial Effects. Can These Be Prevent?[J]. Finance and Development,(33):44-46.
Pearce D. W..1999. Methodological Issues In Economic Analysis. The Economics of InvoluntaryResettlement: Challenges and Questions[M]. Michael Cernea. Washington D. C. TheworldBank.
Peter M. Bentler and David G.Weeks.1980. Linear Structural Equations With Latent Variables.[J]Psychometrika,45(3):289–308.
Pirttil,J. and R.Uusitalo.2010. A ‘Leaky Bucket’ In The Real World:Estimating Inequality AversionUsing Survey Data[J], Economica.77(305):60-76
Richmond A.1988. Sociological Theories of International Migration: The Case of Refugees[J].Current Sociology,(36)7-25.
Sabina Alkire.2002.Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction[M].Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sara Lelli.2001. Factor Analysis Vs. Fuzzy Sets Theory: Assessing The Influence of DifferentTechniques On Sen’s Functioning Approach[M]. KU Leuven.
Scoones I.2001. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framewok Analysis[M]. Institute forDevelopment Studies, Brighton, Uk.
Serge-Christoph Kolm.1977. Multidimensional Egalitarianism. Quarterly Journal of Economics[J],(91):1–13.
Seth,S.2009.Inequality, Interactions, and Human Development, Journal of Human Developmentand Capabilities[J],(10),375–396.
Stephan Klasen.2000. Measuring Poverty and Deprivation In South Africa. Review of Income andWealth[J],(46):33–58,.
Suman Seth.2012. Inequality, Interactions and Human Development[M]. New York:McgrawHill,:325-340.
Tania Burchardt and Julian Le Grand..2002. Constraint and Opportunity: Identifying VoluntaryNon-Employment[J]. CASE Working Paper,(55).
W. Gorman..1980.A Possible Procedure For Analyzing Quality Differentials In The Egg-Market.Review of Economic Studies[J],(47):843–856,.
Wiebke Kuklys and Ingrid Robeyns.2004. Sen’s Capability Approach to Welfare Economics[J].Cambridge Working Papers On Economics.
Wiebke Kuklys.2003. Measuring Standard of Living In The UK-An Application of Sen’sCapability Approach Using Structural Equation Modelling[J]. Max Planck Institute ForResearch Into Economic Systems: Papers On Strategic Interaction.
World Commission On Dams.2003. Dams and Development:A New Framework For DecisionMaking-Overview[M].World Commission On Dams.
贝克尔.1987.人力资本[M].北京大学出版社.
曹磊,孟宪和.2010.北京奥运会项目群整合计划管理[J].项目研究,(7):9-16.
陈绍军.2003.施国庆.中国非自愿移民的贫困分析[J].甘肃社会科学,(5):14-20.
程静.2004.风险投资项目及其利益相关者研究[J].科技管理研究(5):44-45.
段跃芳.2007.开发性移民政策、概念框架、应用及发展[J].江汉论坛,(7):131-134.
樊万选.2006.南水北调中线水源区污染防治与生态环境保护研究[J].环境保护,(1):64-68.
丰景春.2005.大中型调水工程运作与管理体制[J].中国投资,(10):110-113.
风笑天.2008.安置方式、人际交往与移民适应——江苏、浙江343户三峡农村移民的比较研究[J].社会,(2):152-161.
风笑天.2006.落地生根：三峡农村移民的社会适应[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社.
封光寅,李身渝,林云发.2006.南水北调中线水源区水环境变化趋势分析[J].人民黄河,(8):44-45..
峰强,陶传进.2002.工程移民的性质定位兼与其他移民类型的比较J].江苏社会科学,(6):76-80.
冯江.2003.四川水资源开发项目的社会评价研究[D].西南交通大学硕士论文.
冯彦,何大明等.2000.澜沧江一湄公河水资源公平合理分配模式分析[J].自然资源学报,15(3):241-245
扶玉枝,朱磊.2007.家庭特征对衣户兼业经营的影响分析[J].广东商学院学报,(4):80-83.
付保红,陈丽晖,朱彤.2004.云南高山峡谷区大型水电站建设开发性移民研究——以漫湾、大朝山电站为例[J].地域研究与开发,(12):111-14.
傅湘.1999.区域水资源承载力综合评价,长江流域资源与环境[J],8(2):168-172.
高更和,管华.2002.南水北调中线工程源头区水土流失及其治理[J].水土保持通报,(3):65-68.
高进云,乔荣锋,张安录.2007.农地城市流转前后农户福利变化的模糊评价—基于森的可行能力理论[J].管理世界,(6):45-55.
高文艺.2003.世界各国的调水工程,世界地理[J],(4):1~20.
管驰明,姚士谋,陆树.2003.基于全球区位论的城市发展研究:以江苏省南通市为例[J].人文地理,(8):69-74.
郭菊娥,邢公奇,何建武.2003.黄河流域水资源价格与总产值变动的波及效应分析[J].水利经济.(9):42-45.
郭庆汉.2002.南水北调:十堰经济发展的重要机遇[J].武汉交通管理干部学院学报,(4):40-46.
郭秀锐等.2003..城市生态足迹计算与分析——以广州为例[J].地理研究,(5):654-662.
国家计委投资研究所、建设部标准定额研究所社会评价课题组.1997.投资项目社会评价指南[M].北京:经济管理出版社.
国务院.2005南水北调工程建设征地补偿和移民安置暂行办法..
韩传春.2004.第三经济主体[M].太原:山西经济出版社.
韩宇平,阮本清.2003.区域水安全评价指标体系初步研究[J].环境科学学报,23(2):267-272.
韩振燕.2006.水库移民迁移前后人力资本变化实证分析——温州珊溪水库移民案例研究[J].技术经济,(3):49-53.
郝永红,李绒,周海潮,黄登宇.2004.山西省可持续发展的灰色综合评估[J].经济地理.,(3);17-20.
郝志平.2004.高速公路社会效益评价指标体系分析研究[J].辽宁交通科技,(7):90-91.
何爱平.2005.区域经济可持续发展导论[M].经济科学出版社.
何继善,王孟均.2008.工程与工程管理的哲学思考[J].中国工程科学.10(3):9-10.
何晓光.2004.南水北调工程调水期的社会发展影响[J].水利发展研究.(4):15-19.
何雪松,黄富强,曾守锤.2010.城乡迁移与精神健康:基于上海的实证研究[J].社会学研究,(1):111-129.
贺寨平.2001.国外社会支持网研究综述[J].国外社会科学,(1):76-82.
胡枫.2007.中国农村劳动力转移的研究:一个文献综述[J].浙江社会科学,(1):201-209.
胡静,杨云彦.2009.大型工程非自愿移民的人力资本失灵——对南水北调中线工程的实证分析[J].经济评论,(4):74~80.
胡荣.2003.社会经济地位与网络资源[J].社会学研究.(5):50-58.
华金阿朗戈.2001.移民研究的评析[J].国际社会科学杂志,(3).23-28.
黄朝永,顾朝林,甄峰.2000.江苏可持续发展能力评价J].经济地理,(5):43-46.
黄海燕.2004.发展项目的公众参与研究[D].南京:河海大学博士论文.
黄河.2002.引黄入晋工程太原供水区水价问题的思考[J].中国水利.(5):80.
黄贤全.2002.美国政府对田纳西河流域的开发,西南师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）[J],(7):46-51.
黄晓波,张喜峰.2007.广西个人社会网络资源状况及改进对策[J].广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,(6):124-128.
黄晓荣,汪党献,裴源生.2005.宁夏国民经济用水投入产出分析[J].资源科学,(3):135-139.
黄有光著,唐翔译.2005.社会福社与经济政策[M].北京:北京人学出版社.
恢晓薇等.2006.本国生态足迹指标的构建及其实证研究[J].东北大学学报（自然科学版）,(10):150-153.
彗姆斯. C.斯科特.2004.王晓毅译.国家的视角——那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的[M].北京:中国社会科学文献出版社.
贾柏富等.2006.水利工程管理体制改革的探讨[J].东北水利水电,(5):65-66.
贾生华,陈宏辉.2002.利益相关者的界定方法述评[J].外国经济与管理,(5)13-18.
荆善馄,李贵宝.2003.南水北调工程的巨大综合效益[J].南水北调与水利科技,(12):40-42.
孔令强,施国庆.2008.水电工程农村移民入股安置模式初探[J].长江流域资源与环境,(3):185-188.
孔令强.2006.易地开发性移民扶贫及其效益评价指标体系[J].学术交流,(7):75~77.
李晶等.水权与水价——国外经验研究与中国改革方向探讨[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2003.
李景华,陈锡康.2004.长江流域片水利投入占用产出分析[J].长江科学院院报,(2):44-47.
李利锋,郑度.2002.区域可持续发展评价:进展与展望J].地理科学进展,(3):237-248.
李林红,介俊,吴莉明.2001.昆明市环境保护投入产出表的多目标规划模型[J].昆明理工大学学报,(1):102-109.
李林红.2002.滇池流域可持续发展投入产出系统动力学模型[J].系统工程理论与实践.(8):89-94.
李明,王清,吴大千,王仁卿.2001.基于真实储蓄方法的招远市的可持续发展能力评价[J].山东大学学报,(9):56-60.
李培林,张翼.2003.走出生活逆境的阴影——失业下岗职工再就业中的“人力资本失灵”研究[J].中国社会科学,(5):85-101.
李强,陶传进.2000.工程移民的性质定位兼与其它移民类型比较[J].江苏社会科学,(11):76-80.
李强.2001.社会支持与青年下岗职工心理健康[J].青年研究,(7):12-17.
李强.2004.农民工与中国社会分层[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社.
李瑞,李永文.2004.南水北调中线工程与南阳旅游业发展前瞻[J].地域研究与开发,(2):65-68.
李润虎,张稳柱.1992.太原市水资源与国民经济投入产出模型[J],水利经济,(4):38-44.
李善同,许新宜.2004.南水北调与中国发展[M].北京:经济科学出版社.
李双成.2001.中国可持续发展水平区域差异的人工神经网络判定[J].经济地理,(9):523-526.
李小云.2001.参与式概论[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社.
李晓云.2007.农民工流动动因及特点研究综述[J].陕西行政学院学报,21(3):32-35.
李新安.2003.中国区域利益冲突及经济协调发展问题研究[D].南京:河海大学.
李雪松.2002.南水北调工程中的公平与效率问题J].地域研究与开发,(2):81-84.
李益民.2006.南水北调中线工程水源区基于舍理经济开发的环境保护[J].南阳师范学院学报,(9):55-57.
梁子安,李玉英,胡兰群等.2006..南水北调中线水源区生态监测及其瀛营养化评价[J].河南师范大学学报.(8):175-178.
廖蔚.2006.水库移民经济沦[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社.
赵长运.2003.南水北调（中线）工程库区移民安置方式及政策建议[J].南阳师范学院学报.(3):72-74.
林东升.2005..农民增收途径的政策分析[J].农村经济,(11):50-51.
林毅夫.2002.解决农村贫困问题需要有新的战略思路[J].北京大学学报.
刘传江,徐建玲.2006.利益补偿与分享机制缺失下的政策失效问题探讨[J].经济评论,(4):54-58.
刘汉桂,牵大为.2003.南水北调——北京可持续发展的支撑工程[J].北京水利,(4):5-6.
刘建必等.2005.中国经济发展与生态足迹的关系研究[J].资源科学,(3):33-39.
刘军.2004.社会网络分析导论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社.
刘凌波.2003.我国政府行为的博弈分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,(1):26-30.
刘爽.2005.试论消除能力贫困与西部大开发J].中国人口科学,(5):46-51.
刘新建.1997.国民经济动态投入占用产出分析的理论与方法研秃[J].系统工程学报,(1):40-48.
刘长生,郭小东,简玉峰.2008.社会福利指数、政府支出规模及其结构优化[J].公共管理学报,(3):91-99.
刘振,雷洪.1999.三峡移民在社会适应中的心态[J].人口研究,(2):19-27.
龙爱华等.2001..我国水资源管理中的行政分割问题与对策[J].中国软科学,(8):17-21.
卢双宝.2002.南水北调工程建设对河北经挤的拉动作用[J].甫水北调与水利科技,(2):11-15.
芦松菡.2007.区域发展综合测评标度:GDP、GGDP到MDP [J].科学教育研究,(2):100-101.
陆佑楣.2008.大型工程项目管理存在的主要问题[J].建筑经济,(6):5-7.
陆远权.2002.浅析三峡库区移民过渡期的贫困问题[J].人口与经济,(2).
罗本成,原魁,稚凌等.2002.基于灰关联度评价的投资决策模型及应用.系统工程理论与实践,(9):132-136.
罗利民,王超,顾强生,谢能刚.2006.基于投入产出分析法的节水经济效益分析[J].水利经济,(3):17-19.
马德峰.2002.影响三峡外迁农村移民社区适应性的客观因素——来自江苏省大丰市首批三峡移民的调查[J].管理世界,(10):43-50.
马骏,郑垂勇.2006.南水北调工程企业化管理浅议[J].水利经济,(4):58-60.
迈克尔.M.塞尼.1996.移民与发展——世界银行移民政策与经验研究[M].河海大学出版社.
迈克尔.M.塞尼.1998.把人放在首位一投资项目社会分析[M].北京:中国计划出版社.
毛汉英.1996.山东省可持续发展指标体系初步研究口[J].地理研究,(41):16-23.
闵庆文,李文华.2002.区域可持续发展能力评价及其在山东五莲的应用[J].生态学报,(6):7-9.
倪红珍,王浩,汪党献,张庆华.2006.基于水资源绿色核算的北京市水价[J],水利学报,(2):210-217.
倪红珍,王洁,汪党献.2004.产业部门的用水性质分析[J].水利水电技术,(5):91-94.
聂鑫,汪晗,郭洁雯,张安录2010.微观福利视角下的库区移民搬迁意愿调查[J].中国人口,资源与环境,(9):159-164.
聂华林,李秀红.2001.区际公平与区域经济可持续发展[J].甘肃社会科学,(5):30-31.
牛树海,秦耀辰.2002.区域可持续发展中的生态空间占用法理论研究[J].河南大学学报（自然科学版）,(4):65-70.
牛振国,崔伟宏.2006.面向区域可持续发展的信息特征分类[J].中国人口、资源与环境.(2):32-36.
潘家华.1994.三峡投资的社会评价及其政策涵义[J].江汉论坛,(8):63-68.
潘玉君等.2002.“区域可持续发展”概念的试定义[J].中国人口·资源与环境,(4):127-129.
戚杰等.2004.区域环境——经济系统的动态仿真——以南水北调后的湖北省襄樊市为例[J].系统工程理沦与实践,(3):107-113.
綦淑娟.1996.政府和农民互动关系的分析[J].社会学研究,(4).51-60.
乔家君.2004.改进的熵值法在河南省可持续发展能力评估中的应用广[J].资源科学,(1):113-119.
任宏.2001.巨工程项目管理[M].科学出版社.
施国庆,陈阿江.1999.工程移民中的社会学问题探讨[J].河海大学学报,(4):19-27.
施国庆.2002.移民学探讨.移民和社会发展国际研讨会论文集[M].
石智雷,杨云彦.2009.非自愿移民经济恢复的影响因素分析——三峡库区与丹江口库区移民比较研究[J].人口研究,(33):72-80.
石智雷,杨云彦,田艳平.2011.非自愿移民经济再发展:基于人力资本的分析[J].中国软科学,(3):115-127.
世界银行.1996.开发项目中的非自愿移民:技术文件[M],水利出版社.
世界银行.2000.世界银行资助项目中的非自愿移民实施政策说明OD4.30[M],水利出版社.
世界银行.1992.世界银行资助项目中的非自愿移民实施政策说明OPN10.08[M],水利出版社.
世界银行.1992.世界银行资助项目中的非自愿移民运行导册[M].水利出版社
舒尔茨.1996.论人力资本投资[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社.
孙田野,马才学,郭洁雯.2011.基于Logit模型的非自愿性移民迁徙分析[J].中国人口,资源与环境,(1):110~114.
陶传进.2000.工程移民搬迁动力分析框架[J].社会学研究,(6):105~111.
王伟,赵远翔,桂威.2013.缅甸伊江上游水电开发移民安置规划探索[J].人民长江,(1):46~53.
王忠伟.2005.大型工程的资源优化[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社.
翁定军.2005.冲突的策略——以S市三峡移民的生活适应为例[J].社会,(2):112-136.
吴隽、张剑英、任丽娟.2005.基于证据推理与粗级理论的供应链合作伙伴选择方法研究.中国软科学,(3):130-133.
徐烽烽,李放,唐焱.2010.苏南农户土地承包经营权置换城镇社会保障前后福利变化的模糊评价[J].中国农村经济,(8):67-79.
杨文键.2004.中国水库农村移民安置模式研究[M].云南美术出版社.
杨云彦,徐映梅等.2008.社会变迁、介入型贫困与能力再造——基于南水北调库区移民的研究[J].管理世界,(11):89-98.
叶嘉国、雷洪.2000.三峡移民对经济发展的适应性[J].中国人口科学,(6):55-60.
叶甚强,吴莉等.2001.区域可持续发展的技术创新与制度创新机制研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,(3):33-36.
易朝路,任晓华.2001.许厚泽.重大工程建设对湖北省产业布局的影响与调整[J].华中师范大学学报（自然科学舨）,(9):349-352.
尹睹波.2003.区域可持续菠器的生态安全评价[J].数量经济技术经济研究,(97):139-144.
尹奇,马璐璐,王庆日.2010.基于森的功能和能力福利理论的失地农民福利水平评价[J].中国土地科学,(7):41-46.
尹树赋.巢礼义,冯发林.2005.湖南省农业内在特征与水资源.:≮效利用模式[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,(4):80-84.
应星.2001.大河移民上访的故事[M].三联书店.
于冷,戴有息.2000.吉林省水资源投入产出分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,(2):136-140.
于谦,高萍.2011.中国农村社会福利指数的构造及实测研究[J].中国农村经济,7(2):63-71.
余文学,高渭文等.2000.水库移民问题的社会经济分析[J].河海大学学报.
元相虎,李华等.2005.基于生态足迹模型中国可持续发展动态分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境.(3):38-42.
袁俊森.2004.水利工程经济[M].中国水利水电出版.
袁睁,韩沛.2006.南水北凋中线丹江口库区及汇水支流水质现状与污染防治对策[J].水资源与水工程学报,(4):50-53.
岳东霞.2004.甘肃省生态足迹和生态承载力发展趋势研究[J].西北植物学报,(3):454-463.
阅克菲.2006.源头活水清清几许一一来自南水北调中线水源区的调[J].环境保护,(3):33-37.
张绍山,张东晓.1997.施国庆.中国水库移民综述.世界银行贷款项目水库移民研讨会文集[C].
张绍山.1992.水库移民的“次生贫困”及其对策初探[J].水利经济.
张绍山.2006.中国水工程移民补偿机制发展与改革[J].水利水电科技进展,(3):1-6.
张维迎.1996.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社.(5)397-445.
张文,尹继东.2006.我国中部农村劳动力转移影响因素的实证分析[J].江西社会科学.(6):28.
张文宏.1996,阮丹青,潘允康.天津农村居民的社会网[J].社会学研究,(2):108-119.
张学文.2002.区域可持续发展的调控及其对策研究[J].学术交流,(3):95-98.
张郁,邓伟.2006.基于投入产出模型的吉林省水资源经济效益分析[J].东北师大学报（自然科学版）,(3):133-137.
赵锋,杨云彦.2009.外力冲击下水库移民生计脆弱性及其解决机制——以南水北调中线工程库区为例[J].人口与经济,(4):1-7.
郑远红.20006.关于农民增收途径的实证分析[J].农业经济(2):56-57.
中共湖北省委宣传部等.2006..湖北新农村建设的思路与对策[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社.
中国环境年鉴编辑委员会编.2003.中国环境年鉴:[M].北京:中国环境年鉴编辑委员会年鉴社.
周甲禄,黄艳,吴植.2011.南水北调工程的“世界之最”[N/OL].新华网,Http://News.Xinhuanet.Com/Energy/2011-12/20/C_122452944.Htm.
朱东恺.2004.投资项目利益相关者管理探析[J].理论与改革,(1):92-93.
American Society of Civil Engineers.2002. Architectural Wonders of The World's Top Ten In20thCentury[J]. Michael Cernea. Washington D. C.
Anand S, Sen A.2000, The Income Component of The Human Development Index [J]. Journal ofHuman Development and Capabilities,1(1):83–106.
Anthony B. Atkinson and Bourguignon F.1982. The Comparison of Multidimensioned Distributionof Economic Status [J]. Review of Economic Studies,(49):183–201,
Anthony B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon.1987. Income Distribution and Differences In Needs[M].Macmillan Press, London.
Atkinson,A.B. and Bourguignon,F.1982. The Comparison of Multi-Dimensioned Distributions ofEconomic Status [J]. Review of Economic Studies, Vol.49(2):183–201.
Bebbington A. J.1997. Social Capital and Rural Intensification: Local Organizations and Islands ofSustainability In The Rural andes [J]. The Geographic Journal,163(2):189~197.
Bourguignon F, Chakravarty S R.2011. The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty[J]. Journalof Economic Inequality,(1)25-49.
Bratt R.2002. Housing and Family Well-Being[J]. Housing Studies,14(1):13-26.
Chris De Wet.2002. Improving Outcomes In Development—Induced Displacement andResettlement (DIDR) Projects[J]. Forced Migration Review.(12).
Davenport T. O.1999. Human Capital: What Is It and Why People Invest It[M].. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Dutta, I., Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y.2003. On Measuring Deprivation and The Standard of LivingIn A Multidimensional Framework On The Basis of Aggregate Data[J]. Economica,(278):197–221.
Elena Bardasi, Stephen Jenkins, and John A. Rigg. Documentation.2001.For Derived Current andAnnual Net Household Income Variables, BHPS Waves1-9[M]. Mimeo,University of Essex,
Esfandiar Maasoumi.1986. The Measurement and Decomposition of Multi-DimensionalInequality[J]. Econometrica,(4):991–997.
Esfandiar Maasoumi.2004. Composite Indices of Income and Other Developmental Indicators: AGeneral Approach. Research On Economic Inequality[J], Economica,(1):269–286.
Foster J, Shorrocks.2000.A. Subgroup Consistent Poverty Indices [J]. Econometrica,59(3):687–709.
Francois Bourguignon and Satya R..1999. Chakravarty. A Family of Multidimensional PovertyMeasures. In D. Slottje, Editor, Advances In Econometrics, Income Distribution andMethodology of Science[M]. Springer Verlag, London.
Francois Bourguignon and Satya R. Chakravarty.2003. The Measurement of MultidimensionalPoverty[J]. Journal of Economic Inequality.
Hicks D.1997. The Inequality Adjusted Human Development Index: A Constructive Proposal[J].World Development,25(8):83–98.
Jac. L.A.Geurts, Cisca Joldersma..2001. Methodology For Participatory Policy Analysis[J].Europe Journal of Operational Research,67-70.
Joereskog K. G..2001. Analysis of Ordinal Variables2: Cross-Sectional Data[M]. Mimeo, SSIWebsite.
Joereskog K. G. and Goldberger.1975. Estimation of A Model With Multiple Indicators andMultiples Causes of A Single Latent Variable[J]. Journal of The American StatisticalAssociation,70:637–639.
Joseph G. Hirschberg, Esfandiar Maasoumi, and Daniel J. Slottje.2000. Clusters of Attributes andWell-Being In The USA[M]. Journal of Applied Econometrics,(16):445–460,
Klugman, J., F. Rodriguez, and H. J. Choi.2011. The HDI2010: New Controversies, OldCritiques[M]. UNDP–HDRO, New York.
Klugman, J., Rodriguez F., and H. J. Choi.2011. The HDI2010: New Controversies, OldCritiques[M]. UNDP–HDRO, New York.
Kolm, S.-C.1977. Multidimensional Equalitarianisms[J],. Quarterly Journal of Economics,91(1),1.13.
Lancaster K.1966.. A New Approach to Consumer Theory[J]. Journal of Political Economy,74:132–157.
Lin Nan.2000. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action [M]. Cambridge UniversityPress.
Mathur H. M.1995.The Resettlement of People Displaced By Development Projects Issues andApproaches, Development, Displacement and Resettlement: Focus On Asian Experiences[M].Vikas Publishing House,(5):15~38.
Michael M. Cernea.1988. Involuntary Resettlement and Development: Some Projects Have AdverseSocial Effects. Can These Be Prevent?[J]. Finance and Development,(33):44-46.
Pearce D. W..1999. Methodological Issues In Economic Analysis. The Economics of InvoluntaryResettlement: Challenges and Questions[M]. Michael Cernea. Washington D. C. TheworldBank.
Peter M. Bentler and David G.Weeks.1980. Linear Structural Equations With Latent Variables.[J]Psychometrika,45(3):289–308.
Pirttil,J. and R.Uusitalo.2010. A ‘Leaky Bucket’ In The Real World:Estimating Inequality AversionUsing Survey Data[J], Economica.77(305):60-76
Richmond A.1988. Sociological Theories of International Migration: The Case of Refugees[J].Current Sociology,(36)7-25.
Sabina Alkire.2002.Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction[M].Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sara Lelli.2001. Factor Analysis Vs. Fuzzy Sets Theory: Assessing The Influence of DifferentTechniques On Sen’s Functioning Approach[M]. KU Leuven.
Scoones I.2001. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framewok Analysis[M]. Institute forDevelopment Studies, Brighton, Uk.
Serge-Christoph Kolm.1977. Multidimensional Egalitarianism. Quarterly Journal of Economics[J],(91):1–13.
Seth,S.2009.Inequality, Interactions, and Human Development, Journal of Human Developmentand Capabilities[J],(10),375–396.
Stephan Klasen.2000. Measuring Poverty and Deprivation In South Africa. Review of Income andWealth[J],(46):33–58,.
Suman Seth.2012. Inequality, Interactions and Human Development[M]. New York:McgrawHill,:325-340.
Tania Burchardt and Julian Le Grand..2002. Constraint and Opportunity: Identifying VoluntaryNon-Employment[J]. CASE Working Paper,(55).
W. Gorman..1980.A Possible Procedure For Analyzing Quality Differentials In The Egg-Market.Review of Economic Studies[J],(47):843–856,.
Wiebke Kuklys and Ingrid Robeyns.2004. Sen’s Capability Approach to Welfare Economics[J].Cambridge Working Papers On Economics.
Wiebke Kuklys.2003. Measuring Standard of Living In The UK-An Application of Sen’sCapability Approach Using Structural Equation Modelling[J]. Max Planck Institute ForResearch Into Economic Systems: Papers On Strategic Interaction.
World Commission On Dams.2003. Dams and Development:A New Framework For DecisionMaking-Overview[M].World Commission On Dams.