朝阳沟油田一类区块深部调剖剂配方优选与性能评价
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Formulation Optimization and Performance Evaluation for Deep Profile Control Agent in the First-class Block of Chaoyanggou Oilfield
- 论文作者：郭永贵
- 英文论文作者：Guo Yonggui
- 年：2016
- 作者机构：大庆油田有限责任公司第十采油厂;
- 论文关键词：朝阳沟油田 ; 深部调剖 ; 配方优选 ; 性能评价 ; 驱油实验
- 英文论文关键词：Chaoyanggou Oilfield ; deep profile control ; formulation optimization ; performance evaluation ; oil displacement experiment
- 会议召开时间：2016-09-01
- 会议录名称：《采油工程文集》2016年第3辑
- 英文会议录名称：Oil Production Engineering
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：TE39
- 学会代码：DQGY
- 学会名称：大庆油田有限责任公司采油工程研究院
- 页数：6
- 文件大小：1479k
- 原文格式：D
摘要
朝阳沟油田一类区块早期注水开发,目前含水率较高,为了改善开发效果,对该区块采取了深部调剖措施。通过室内实验优选出一种适合朝阳沟油田一类区块应用的深部调剖剂,并对其进行了性能评价分析。优选结果如下:主剂为质量浓度1200~2000mg/L的部分水解聚丙烯酰胺,交联剂由质量分数分别是2.23%、2.64%、1.97%的氯化铬、乳酸、氢氧化钠组成,添加剂为质量浓度600~800mg/L的NaCl、500~1500mg/L的NaHCO_3和800mg/L的硫脲,交联比为15∶1。优选深部调剖剂性能良好,从室内岩心实验可以看出,该深部调剖剂能有效封堵裂缝,并大幅度提高采收率,平均封堵率和平均提高采收率分别达到83.95%和24.9%,对现场应用具有重要的指导意义。
The early water injection development of the first-class block in Chaoyanggou Oilfield has caused a high water cut presently. In order to improve the development effect, it is necessary to take the deep profile control measures in the block. A new type of deep profile control agent suitable for the first-class block in Chaoyanggou Oilfield has been developed, whose performance has been evaluated by laboratory experiment. The results showed that the main agent was HPAM with the mass concentration of 1200~2000mg/L; the crosslinking agent was made of chromium chloride, lactic acid and sodium hydroxide, whose mass fraction were 2. 23%, 2. 64% and 1. 97% respectively; the additives were NaCl, NaHCO_3 and thiourea, whose mass concentration were 600 ~ 800mg/L, 500 ~1500mg/L and 800 mg/L; and the crosslinking ratio was 15∶ 1. The optimal deep profile control agent has a very good performance. The indoor core experiments indicated that the deep profile control agent could plug the fractures effectively, and enhance the oil recovery greatly. The average plugging rate and the average enhanced oil recovery reached 83. 95% and 24. 9% respectively, which would provide important guidance in the field application.
The early water injection development of the first-class block in Chaoyanggou Oilfield has caused a high water cut presently. In order to improve the development effect, it is necessary to take the deep profile control measures in the block. A new type of deep profile control agent suitable for the first-class block in Chaoyanggou Oilfield has been developed, whose performance has been evaluated by laboratory experiment. The results showed that the main agent was HPAM with the mass concentration of 1200~2000mg/L; the crosslinking agent was made of chromium chloride, lactic acid and sodium hydroxide, whose mass fraction were 2. 23%, 2. 64% and 1. 97% respectively; the additives were NaCl, NaHCO_3 and thiourea, whose mass concentration were 600 ~ 800mg/L, 500 ~1500mg/L and 800 mg/L; and the crosslinking ratio was 15∶ 1. The optimal deep profile control agent has a very good performance. The indoor core experiments indicated that the deep profile control agent could plug the fractures effectively, and enhance the oil recovery greatly. The average plugging rate and the average enhanced oil recovery reached 83. 95% and 24. 9% respectively, which would provide important guidance in the field application.
引文
[1]张持坤.朝阳沟油田低渗透储层综合定量评价[J].石油地质与工程,2009,23(1):78-79.
[2]杨正明,张英芝,郝明强,等.低渗透油田储层综合评价方法[J].石油学报,2006,23(1):64-66.
[3]殷代印,杨安萍,陈玉新.朝阳沟油田一、二类区块开采效果评价[J].石油地质与工程,2008,22(5):58-59.
[4]宋立忠,李本才,王芳.松辽盆地南部扶余油层低渗透油藏形成机制[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):57-58.
[5]刘子良,魏兆胜,陈文龙,等.裂缝性低渗透砂岩油田合理注采井网[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(4):85-87.
[6]王利民.朝阳沟低渗透油田井网加密方法研究[J].油气田地面工程,2010,29(4):8-10.
[7]张庆国,鲍志东,那未红.注水开发油田水淹油层测井响应特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,2006,30(4):101-102.
[8]由庆,于海洋,王业飞,等.国内油田深部调剖技术的研究进展[J].断块油气田,2009,16(4):68-69.
[9]吕广普,郭焱,蒲春生,等.低渗透油藏用深部调剖剂[J].油气田地面工程,2010,29(6):13-14.
[10]武海燕,罗宪波,张廷山,等.深部调剖剂研究新进展[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(3):1-3.
[11]王鑫,王清发,卢军.体膨颗粒深部调剖技术及其在大庆油田的应用[J].油田化学,2004,27(2):150-151.
[2]杨正明,张英芝,郝明强,等.低渗透油田储层综合评价方法[J].石油学报,2006,23(1):64-66.
[3]殷代印,杨安萍,陈玉新.朝阳沟油田一、二类区块开采效果评价[J].石油地质与工程,2008,22(5):58-59.
[4]宋立忠,李本才,王芳.松辽盆地南部扶余油层低渗透油藏形成机制[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):57-58.
[5]刘子良,魏兆胜,陈文龙,等.裂缝性低渗透砂岩油田合理注采井网[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(4):85-87.
[6]王利民.朝阳沟低渗透油田井网加密方法研究[J].油气田地面工程,2010,29(4):8-10.
[7]张庆国,鲍志东,那未红.注水开发油田水淹油层测井响应特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,2006,30(4):101-102.
[8]由庆,于海洋,王业飞,等.国内油田深部调剖技术的研究进展[J].断块油气田,2009,16(4):68-69.
[9]吕广普,郭焱,蒲春生,等.低渗透油藏用深部调剖剂[J].油气田地面工程,2010,29(6):13-14.
[10]武海燕,罗宪波,张廷山,等.深部调剖剂研究新进展[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(3):1-3.
[11]王鑫,王清发,卢军.体膨颗粒深部调剖技术及其在大庆油田的应用[J].油田化学,2004,27(2):150-151.