基于冲突分析图模型的双渠道供应链价格冲突研究
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Research on Price Conflict in Dual-channel Supply Chain Based on Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
- 论文作者：赵士南 ; 徐海燕 ; 侯晓丽
- 英文论文作者：ZHAO Shi-nan ; XU Hai-yan ; HOU Xiao-li ; College of Economics and Management ; Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics ; School of Humanities ; Southeast University
- 年：2016
- 作者机构：南京航空航天大学经济管理学院;东南大学人文学院;
- 论文关键词：冲突分析图模型 ; 双渠道供应链 ; 价格冲突
- 英文论文关键词：graph model for conflict resolution ; dual-channel supply chain ; price conflict
- 会议召开时间：2016-11-12
- 会议录名称：第十八届中国管理科学学术年会论文集
- 英文会议录名称：Proceedings of the 18th Chinese Annual Conference on Management Science
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：F224.32;F274
- 学会代码：ZHYJ
- 会议名称：第十八届中国管理科学学术年会
- 会议地点：中国陕西西安
- 主办单位：中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会、西安交通大学、中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院、《中国管理科学》编辑部
- 学会名称：中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
- 页数：8
- 文件大小：759k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
本文将冲突分析图模型理论引入到双渠道供应链研究领域,利用冲突分析图模型方法分析、解决双渠道供应链的价格冲突难题。首先,本文构建了双渠道供应链价格冲突的基本图模型,并求得了双方博弈的初始均衡解,即都采取低价竞争策略,使得双方陷入价格战困境。然后,考虑到决策者风险认知的改变,本文又对双渠道供应链价格冲突的演化过程进行了研究,求得了制造商和零售商风险认知改变后的二次博弈的冲突均衡解,即双方都选择差异化策略。本文构建了双渠道供应链价格冲突的图模型框架,动态模拟了冲突双方协商和谈判的博弈过程,在战略层面为分析、解决双渠道供应链价格冲突问题提供了重要的分析工具和决策依据。
The graph model for conflict resolution is first employed to model and analyze the price conflict in dual-channel supply chain.Firstly,basic price conflict model of dual-channel supply chain is constructed and the initial equilibrium solution is obtained by GMCRDSS,in which both of the manufacturer and retailer choose to reduce product price.As a result,they will be trapped in a dilemma of price competition which increases their risk.Therefore,the status quo analysis of price conflict is carried out and the final equilibrium solution is figured out after the change of each decision maker's risk perception.The equilibrium is that all DMs prefer to the strategy of differentiation which can decrease their risk.The research in this paper provides an important analysis technique for how to analyze price conflict problem in dual-channel supply chain.
The graph model for conflict resolution is first employed to model and analyze the price conflict in dual-channel supply chain.Firstly,basic price conflict model of dual-channel supply chain is constructed and the initial equilibrium solution is obtained by GMCRDSS,in which both of the manufacturer and retailer choose to reduce product price.As a result,they will be trapped in a dilemma of price competition which increases their risk.Therefore,the status quo analysis of price conflict is carried out and the final equilibrium solution is figured out after the change of each decision maker's risk perception.The equilibrium is that all DMs prefer to the strategy of differentiation which can decrease their risk.The research in this paper provides an important analysis technique for how to analyze price conflict problem in dual-channel supply chain.
引文
[1]赵礼强,徐家旺.基于电子市场的供应链双渠道冲突与协调的契约设计[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(5):61-68.
[2]徐广业,但斌,肖剑.基于改进收益共享契约的双渠道供应链协调研究[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(6):59-64.
[3]许民利,聂晓哲,简惠云.不同风险偏好下双渠道供应链定价决策[J].控制与决策,2016,31(1):91-98.
[4]柏庆国,徐贤浩.带学习效应的双渠道供应链库存策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(2):59-69.
[5]吴晓志,陈宏,解东川,等.多因素扰动下同价双渠道供应链协调应对突发事件[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(6):95-127.
[6]Kigour D M,Hipel K W.Fang L iping.The graph model for conflicts[J].Automatica,1987,23(1):41-55.
[7]Li K W.Hipel K W.Kilgour D M,et al.Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and CyberneticsPart A:Systems and Humans,2004,34(4):507-520.
[8]Hamouda L.Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.Strength of preference in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Group Decision and Negotiation,2004,13(5):449-462.
[9]Hamouda L.KilgourD W,HipelK W.Strength of preference in graph models for multiple-decision-maker conflicts[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2006,179(1):314-327.
[10]Xu Haiyan,Hipel K W,Kilgour D M.Preference strength and uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution for two decision-makers[M].NEW YORK:IEEE,2008.
[11]Xu Haiyan,Hipel K W.Kilgour D M,etal.Combining strength and uncertainty for preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution with multiple decision makers[J].Theory and Decision,2010,69(4):497-521.
[12]Fang Liping,Hipel K W.Kigour D M.et al.A decision support system for interactive decision making-PartⅠ:Model formulation[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics-Part C:Applications and Reviews,2003,33(1):42-55.
[13]Fang Liping,Hipel K W,Kigour D M,et al.A decision support system for interactive decision making-PartⅡ:Analysis and output interpretation[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics-Part C:Applications and Reviews,2003,33(1):56-66.
[14]Yu Jing,Hipel K W.Kilgour D M,et al.Option prioritization for unknown preference[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2015,25(1):39-61.
[15]Fraser N M,Hipel K W.Solving complex conflicts[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics,1979,9(12):805-817.
[16]Inohara T.State transition time analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2016,274:372-382.
[17]Kinsara R A.Petersons O,Hipel K W.et al.Advanced decision support for the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Journal of Decision Systems,2015,24(2):117-145.
[18]Xu Haiyan,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.Matrix representation of conflict resolution in multiple-decision-maker graph models with preference uncertainty[J].Group Decision and Negotiation,2011,20(6):755-779.
[19]Xu Hanyan,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.et al.Using matrices to link conflict evolution and resolution in a graph model[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2010,207(1):318-329.
[20]Inohara T,Hipel K W.Interrelationships among attitude-based and conventional stability concepts within the graph model for conflict resolution[C]//Proeedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man and Cybernetics,San Antonio,U.S.,October,2009:1130-1135.
[21]Xu Haiyan,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W,et al.Theory and implementation of coalitional analysis in cooperative decision making[J].Theory and decision,2014,76(2):147-171.
[22]Li K W,Inohara T,Xu Haiyan.Coalition analysis with preference uncertainty in group decision support[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2014,231(1):307-319.
[23]Xu Haiyan,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.Matrix representation and extension of coalition analysis in group decision support[J].Computers and Mathematics with Applications,2010,60(5):1164-1176.
[24]Inohara T,Hipel K W.Coalition analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Systems Engineering,2008,11(4):343-359.
[25]韩雪山.基于冲突分析图模型的结盟稳定性研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2013.
[26]Li K W,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.Status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Journal of the Operational Research Society,2005,56(6):699-707.
[27]Xu Haiyan.Li K W,Hipel K W,et al.A matrix approach to status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2009,212(2).470-480.
[28]Zhao Min.Li K W,Xu Haiyan.Representations of status quo analysis in the graph model for strength of preference[C]//Proeedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man and Cybernetics,San Antonio,U.S..October,2009.
[29]Hipel K W.Sean B W.Conflict analysis in environmental management[J].Environmetrics,2010(22):279-293.
[30]He Shaiwei,Hipel K W.Kilgour D M.A hierarchical approach to study supply chain conflicts between Airbus and Boeing[C]//Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man and Cybernetics,San Diego,US,October 5-8,2014.
[31]Obeidi A,Hipel K W.Kilgour D M.Canadian bulk water exports:analyzing the sun belt conflict using the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Knowledge,Technology&Policy,2002,14(4):145-163.
[32]Sheikhmohammady,Hipel K W,Asilahijani H,et al.Strategic analysis of the conflict over Iran's nuclear program[C]//Proceeding of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics,San Antonio,Texas,US,October 11-14,2009.
[33]Su Xin.Chen Ye,Hipel K W,et al.Comparison of the analytic network process and the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Journal of Systems and Systems Engineering,2005,14(3):308-325.
[34]Heng M,Hipel K W,Fang Liping.Alberta oil sands development conflict[C]//Proceeding of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics,San Antonio,Texas,US,October 11-14,2009.
[2]徐广业,但斌,肖剑.基于改进收益共享契约的双渠道供应链协调研究[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(6):59-64.
[3]许民利,聂晓哲,简惠云.不同风险偏好下双渠道供应链定价决策[J].控制与决策,2016,31(1):91-98.
[4]柏庆国,徐贤浩.带学习效应的双渠道供应链库存策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(2):59-69.
[5]吴晓志,陈宏,解东川,等.多因素扰动下同价双渠道供应链协调应对突发事件[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(6):95-127.
[6]Kigour D M,Hipel K W.Fang L iping.The graph model for conflicts[J].Automatica,1987,23(1):41-55.
[7]Li K W.Hipel K W.Kilgour D M,et al.Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and CyberneticsPart A:Systems and Humans,2004,34(4):507-520.
[8]Hamouda L.Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.Strength of preference in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Group Decision and Negotiation,2004,13(5):449-462.
[9]Hamouda L.KilgourD W,HipelK W.Strength of preference in graph models for multiple-decision-maker conflicts[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2006,179(1):314-327.
[10]Xu Haiyan,Hipel K W,Kilgour D M.Preference strength and uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution for two decision-makers[M].NEW YORK:IEEE,2008.
[11]Xu Haiyan,Hipel K W.Kilgour D M,etal.Combining strength and uncertainty for preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution with multiple decision makers[J].Theory and Decision,2010,69(4):497-521.
[12]Fang Liping,Hipel K W.Kigour D M.et al.A decision support system for interactive decision making-PartⅠ:Model formulation[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics-Part C:Applications and Reviews,2003,33(1):42-55.
[13]Fang Liping,Hipel K W,Kigour D M,et al.A decision support system for interactive decision making-PartⅡ:Analysis and output interpretation[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics-Part C:Applications and Reviews,2003,33(1):56-66.
[14]Yu Jing,Hipel K W.Kilgour D M,et al.Option prioritization for unknown preference[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2015,25(1):39-61.
[15]Fraser N M,Hipel K W.Solving complex conflicts[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics,1979,9(12):805-817.
[16]Inohara T.State transition time analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2016,274:372-382.
[17]Kinsara R A.Petersons O,Hipel K W.et al.Advanced decision support for the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Journal of Decision Systems,2015,24(2):117-145.
[18]Xu Haiyan,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.Matrix representation of conflict resolution in multiple-decision-maker graph models with preference uncertainty[J].Group Decision and Negotiation,2011,20(6):755-779.
[19]Xu Hanyan,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.et al.Using matrices to link conflict evolution and resolution in a graph model[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2010,207(1):318-329.
[20]Inohara T,Hipel K W.Interrelationships among attitude-based and conventional stability concepts within the graph model for conflict resolution[C]//Proeedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man and Cybernetics,San Antonio,U.S.,October,2009:1130-1135.
[21]Xu Haiyan,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W,et al.Theory and implementation of coalitional analysis in cooperative decision making[J].Theory and decision,2014,76(2):147-171.
[22]Li K W,Inohara T,Xu Haiyan.Coalition analysis with preference uncertainty in group decision support[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2014,231(1):307-319.
[23]Xu Haiyan,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.Matrix representation and extension of coalition analysis in group decision support[J].Computers and Mathematics with Applications,2010,60(5):1164-1176.
[24]Inohara T,Hipel K W.Coalition analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Systems Engineering,2008,11(4):343-359.
[25]韩雪山.基于冲突分析图模型的结盟稳定性研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2013.
[26]Li K W,Kilgour D M,Hipel K W.Status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Journal of the Operational Research Society,2005,56(6):699-707.
[27]Xu Haiyan.Li K W,Hipel K W,et al.A matrix approach to status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2009,212(2).470-480.
[28]Zhao Min.Li K W,Xu Haiyan.Representations of status quo analysis in the graph model for strength of preference[C]//Proeedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man and Cybernetics,San Antonio,U.S..October,2009.
[29]Hipel K W.Sean B W.Conflict analysis in environmental management[J].Environmetrics,2010(22):279-293.
[30]He Shaiwei,Hipel K W.Kilgour D M.A hierarchical approach to study supply chain conflicts between Airbus and Boeing[C]//Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man and Cybernetics,San Diego,US,October 5-8,2014.
[31]Obeidi A,Hipel K W.Kilgour D M.Canadian bulk water exports:analyzing the sun belt conflict using the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Knowledge,Technology&Policy,2002,14(4):145-163.
[32]Sheikhmohammady,Hipel K W,Asilahijani H,et al.Strategic analysis of the conflict over Iran's nuclear program[C]//Proceeding of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics,San Antonio,Texas,US,October 11-14,2009.
[33]Su Xin.Chen Ye,Hipel K W,et al.Comparison of the analytic network process and the graph model for conflict resolution[J].Journal of Systems and Systems Engineering,2005,14(3):308-325.
[34]Heng M,Hipel K W,Fang Liping.Alberta oil sands development conflict[C]//Proceeding of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics,San Antonio,Texas,US,October 11-14,2009.