贵阳市岩溶地下水水化学特征及水质评价
|
摘要
贵阳市是典型的岩溶盆地地貌,地下水系统十分复杂,具有特殊的水文地球化学特征。为查明贵阳市主城区及周边地区地下水水化学特征及水质状况,运用数理统计、piper三线图、Schoeller图对该研究区60个地下水监测点枯、丰两季的水化学指标进行分析,采用基于GRA-AHP的地下水水质评价模型对研究区的水质进行评价,结果表明:研究区地下水中各水化学指标满足生活饮用水标准,地下水化学参数除K~+、Fe~(3+)变异性较强外,其他含量均相对稳定,水化学成分中优势阳离子为Ca~(2+)、Mg~(2+),优势阴离子为HCO_3~-、SO_4~(2-),地下水水化学类型以HCO_3~-.SO_4~(2-)-Ca型、HCO_3~--Ca.Mg型和HCO_3~--Ca型为主;相关关系分析表明地下水表现出高Ca~(2+)、Mg~(2+)、SO_4~(2-)特征是来自该研究区石灰岩、白云岩、石膏中不同造岩矿物的溶解;利用基于GRA-AHP的地下水水质评价模型对研究区的水质进行综合评价,结果显示该研究区岩溶地下水丰水期质量优于枯水期质量,丰水期Ⅱ类水占33%,Ⅲ类水占63%,枯水期Ⅱ类水占16%,Ⅲ类水占75%。该研究结果对贵阳市的水-岩-生态-环境的保护提供依据。
Guiyang is a typical karst basin landform,the groundwater system is very complex and has unique hydrogeological and geochemical characteristics.In order to ascertain the groundwater chemical characteristics and water quality of the main urban area and surrounding areas of Guiyang City,the monitoring data of 60 groundwater samples in the area were analyzed,the hydrochemicl characteristics of the area were analyzed by mathematical statistics,piper three-line diagram and Schoeller diagram,and the GRA-AHP based groundwater quality assessment model was used for water quality evaluation.The results show that:the hydrochemical indicators in the groundwater of the study area meet the drinking water standards;except the strong variability of K~+and Fe~(3+),the groundwater chemical parameters are relatively stable,the dominant cations in hydrochemical composition are Ca~(2+) and Mg~(2+),and the dominant anions are HCO_3~-,SO_4~(2-),the groundwater chemical type is mainly HCO_3~-.SO_4~(2-)-Ca type,、HCO_3~--Ca.Mg type and HCO_3~--Ca type.Correlation analysis shows that the groundwater shows high Ca~(2+),Mg~(2+),SO_4~(2-) characteristics from the dissolution of different rock-forming minerals in limestone,dolomite and gypsum in the study area.The results of water quality evaluation by using GRA-AHP model based on index scale in study area show that the quality of kars groundwater in rainy season in this study area is better than that in dry season.In flood season,typeⅡ water accounts for 33%,typeⅢ water accounts for 63%,while in dry season,typeⅡwater accounts for 16%,and typeⅢ water accounts for 75%.The results of this study provide a basis for the protection of water-rock-ecological-environment in Guiyang City.
Guiyang is a typical karst basin landform,the groundwater system is very complex and has unique hydrogeological and geochemical characteristics.In order to ascertain the groundwater chemical characteristics and water quality of the main urban area and surrounding areas of Guiyang City,the monitoring data of 60 groundwater samples in the area were analyzed,the hydrochemicl characteristics of the area were analyzed by mathematical statistics,piper three-line diagram and Schoeller diagram,and the GRA-AHP based groundwater quality assessment model was used for water quality evaluation.The results show that:the hydrochemical indicators in the groundwater of the study area meet the drinking water standards;except the strong variability of K~+and Fe~(3+),the groundwater chemical parameters are relatively stable,the dominant cations in hydrochemical composition are Ca~(2+) and Mg~(2+),and the dominant anions are HCO_3~-,SO_4~(2-),the groundwater chemical type is mainly HCO_3~-.SO_4~(2-)-Ca type,、HCO_3~--Ca.Mg type and HCO_3~--Ca type.Correlation analysis shows that the groundwater shows high Ca~(2+),Mg~(2+),SO_4~(2-) characteristics from the dissolution of different rock-forming minerals in limestone,dolomite and gypsum in the study area.The results of water quality evaluation by using GRA-AHP model based on index scale in study area show that the quality of kars groundwater in rainy season in this study area is better than that in dry season.In flood season,typeⅡ water accounts for 33%,typeⅢ water accounts for 63%,while in dry season,typeⅡwater accounts for 16%,and typeⅢ water accounts for 75%.The results of this study provide a basis for the protection of water-rock-ecological-environment in Guiyang City.
引文
[1]周忠发,张结,殷超,等.岩溶洞穴地下水水化学特征及其地球化学敏感性比较———以贵州双河洞和织金洞为例[J].水利水电技术,2017,48(6):98-105.
[2]资惠宇,庞园,张明珠.基于主成分分析法的广州市从化区地下水质量评价[J].人民珠江,2017,38(10):72-76.
[3]魏光辉,马亮.基于正态云模型的区域水资源承载力评价[J].节水灌溉,2015(1):68-71.
[4]庞园,李志威,曾慧,等.广花盆地浅层地下水环境质量评价[J].节水灌溉,2018(7):56-60.
[5]刘博,肖长来,田浩然,等.灰色关联和层次分析法在地下水质评价中的应用———以吉林市为例[J].节水灌溉,2013(1):26-27.
[6]汪明武,周天龙,叶晖,等.基于联系云的地下水水质可拓评价模型[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(8):3 035-3 041.
[7]刘奇.贵阳岩溶地下水水质评价及污染风险性研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2006.
[8]王中美.贵阳市岩溶地下水4种污染离子的空间分布特征[J].贵州农业科学,2013,41(5):158-164.
[9]杨秀丽,罗维,裴建国,等.贵阳市岩溶地下水水质变化特征浅析[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(5):713-720.
[10]张罗致.贵阳市轨道交通1号线主要水文地质问题分析[D].成都:成都理工大学,2011.
[11]宋小庆.影响贵阳地下空间开发的环境地质因素分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2017,13(2):503-507.
[12]王中美,谭正莲.贵阳市岩溶地下水动态特征分析[J].贵州大学学报,2013,30(1):27-32.
[13]孙大明.基于层次分析法的大连市大沙河流域水质综合评价[J].水电能源科学,2017,35(8):53-55,115.
[14]张晨光,吴泽宁.层次分析法(AHP)比例标度的分析与改进[J].郑州工业大学学报,2000,(2):85-87.
[15]孙东生,朱懿,周水兴.基于指数标度的层次分析法在桥梁评定中的应用[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2010,29(6):867-870.
[16]张世旭,王中美,代天豪.毕节地区岩溶地下水水化学特征与水质评价[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(5):28-33,41.
[2]资惠宇,庞园,张明珠.基于主成分分析法的广州市从化区地下水质量评价[J].人民珠江,2017,38(10):72-76.
[3]魏光辉,马亮.基于正态云模型的区域水资源承载力评价[J].节水灌溉,2015(1):68-71.
[4]庞园,李志威,曾慧,等.广花盆地浅层地下水环境质量评价[J].节水灌溉,2018(7):56-60.
[5]刘博,肖长来,田浩然,等.灰色关联和层次分析法在地下水质评价中的应用———以吉林市为例[J].节水灌溉,2013(1):26-27.
[6]汪明武,周天龙,叶晖,等.基于联系云的地下水水质可拓评价模型[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(8):3 035-3 041.
[7]刘奇.贵阳岩溶地下水水质评价及污染风险性研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2006.
[8]王中美.贵阳市岩溶地下水4种污染离子的空间分布特征[J].贵州农业科学,2013,41(5):158-164.
[9]杨秀丽,罗维,裴建国,等.贵阳市岩溶地下水水质变化特征浅析[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(5):713-720.
[10]张罗致.贵阳市轨道交通1号线主要水文地质问题分析[D].成都:成都理工大学,2011.
[11]宋小庆.影响贵阳地下空间开发的环境地质因素分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2017,13(2):503-507.
[12]王中美,谭正莲.贵阳市岩溶地下水动态特征分析[J].贵州大学学报,2013,30(1):27-32.
[13]孙大明.基于层次分析法的大连市大沙河流域水质综合评价[J].水电能源科学,2017,35(8):53-55,115.
[14]张晨光,吴泽宁.层次分析法(AHP)比例标度的分析与改进[J].郑州工业大学学报,2000,(2):85-87.
[15]孙东生,朱懿,周水兴.基于指数标度的层次分析法在桥梁评定中的应用[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2010,29(6):867-870.
[16]张世旭,王中美,代天豪.毕节地区岩溶地下水水化学特征与水质评价[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(5):28-33,41.