NBAS-ASP服务在肺癌术后急性疼痛管理中应用

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：NBAS-ASP Service in Postoperative Acute Pain Management of Lung Cancer 作者：张学美 ; 赵淑潭 ; 崔立敏 ; 苏全志 ; 李秀芝 英文作者：ZHANG Xue-mei;ZHAO Shu-tan;CUI Li-min;SU Quan-zhi;LI Xiu-zhi;Department of Nursing, Outpatient Operating Room, Binzhou Women & Children's Health Care Hospital;Shuiluopo Town's Health Center of Yangxin Country;Nursing Department of Binzhou People's Hospital;Cardio thoracic surgery in Binzhou People's Hospital; 关键词：NBAS-APS ; 护士 ; 肺癌 ; 急性疼痛 ; 规范化镇痛 英文关键词：NBAS-APS;;Nurses;;Lung cancer;;Acute pain;;Standardized pain management 中文刊名：XTYX 英文刊名：Systems Medicine 机构：滨州市妇幼保健院门诊手术室;阳信县水落坡镇卫生院外科;滨州市人民医院护理部;滨州市人民医院心胸外科; 出版日期：2017-11-05 出版单位：系统医学 年：2017 期：v.2;No.33 基金：山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2013WS0097) 语种：中文; 页：XTYX201721067 页数：4 CN：21 ISSN：10-1369/R 分类号：168-171

摘要

目的探讨以护士为主体、临床医师及麻醉医师协作的的服务模式(Nurse-based Acute Pain Service,NBASAPS)对肺癌术后急性疼痛控制的干预效果。方法选取2014年11月—2015年12月在该院手术的肺癌患者152例,随机分为干预组(77例)和对照组(75例)。干预组运行NBAS-APS规范化的疼痛干预,对照组实施常规疼痛干预。观察两组患者术前1d—术后72 hVAS分值、胸腔引流管置管时间、术后首次下床活动时间、术后5 d肺部并发症发生率及镇痛满意度。结果干预组患者:术后12 hVAS(3.91±1.89)分、术后24 h(3.01±1.88)分、术后48 h(2.55±1.78)分、VASmax(4.94±1.67)分、VASmean(2.76±1.51)分、PVAS>3(12.79±2.86)h,均明显低于对照组(P<0.01);胸腔引流管置管时间(57.1±3.97)h较对照组明显缩短(P<0.01),首次下床活动时间(29.57±3.54)h较对照组提前(P<0.01);肺炎发生率3.90%、肺不张发生率1.30%,均明显低于对照组(P<0.05);术后5 d镇痛满意度较对照组提高33.89%(χ~2=249.72,P<0.01)。结论 NBAS-APS疼痛规范化干预充分发挥了护士在疼痛管理中的优势,有效降低了患者急性疼痛强度,缩短了首次下床活动及胸腔引流管带管时间,减轻了肺部并发症的发生率,患者镇痛满意度大幅度提高。
        Objective This paper tries to evaluate the clinical effect of NBAS-APS in standardized pain management in the controlling acute pain of postoperative patients with lung cancer. Methods 152 patients with lung cancer received the surgical treatment in this hospital from November 2014 to December 2015 were selected and were randomly divided into intervention group(77 patients) and control group(75 patients). The intervention group adopted NBAS-APS standardized pain intervention and the control group performed routine pain intervention. The VAS scores of 1 d before surgery and 72 h after operation, chest drainage tube catheterization time, time to first bed after ambulation, incidence of pulmonary complications 5 d after operation and analgesia satisfaction of the two groups were observed. Results Compared with that in the control group in the postoperative period, the pain VAS scores at postoperative 12 h was(3.91±1.89) poins, the pain VAS scores at postoperative 24 h was(3.01±1.88) points, the pain VAS scores at postoperative 48 h was(2.55±1.78) points, the maximum of pain VAS scores was(4.94±1.67) points, the mean of pain VAS scores was(2.76±1.51) points, the length of pain VAS scores PVAS>3(12.79±2.86)h, lower than control group(P<0.01). The time with a chest tube in the intervention group was(57.1±3.9) in 7 h and the first time out of bed after operation was(29.57±3.54) h, shorter than the control group(P<0.01). The incidence of pneumonia and atelectasis was 3.90% and 1.30%, significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05). The analgesic satisfaction in the intervention group was 33.89%, higher than the control group(χ~2=249.72,P<0.01). Conclusion NBAS-APS in standardized pain management in the controlling acute pain of postoperative patients with lung cancer can significantly reduce acute pain intensity and shorten the first time out of bed after operation and the time with a chest tube and reduce the incidence of pulmonary complications. And it also greatly improves the analgesic satisfaction of patients.

引文

[1]耿寒,孙兆菲,朱荣孜.护理干预在疼痛管理中的应用[J].中国实用医刊,2015,42(20):114-115.
    [2]Chhangani BS,Roehrs TA,Harris EJ,et al.Pain Sensi tivity in Sleepy Pain-Free Normals[J].Sleep,2009,32(8):1011-1017.
    [3]Rawal N,Berggren L.Organization or acute pain services:a low cost model[J].Pain,1994,57(1):117-123.
    [4]丁文玲.持续质量改进在骨创伤患者疼痛管理中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2014,20(4):108-109.
    [5]苏全志,崔立敏,杨丕荣.骨折患者围术期疼痛规范化管理临床效果分析[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2014,20(6):18-21.
    [6]江志伟,黎介寿.规范化开展加速康复外科几个关键问题[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(1):44-46.
    [7]胡丽霞,张英,耿文真,等.快速康复外科规范镇痛在肛周疾病围术期患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2016,22(24):5-7.
    [8]任红艳,刘东英,卢红梅,等.品管圈活动提高癌痛患者疼痛治疗依从性的临床实践[J].中国实用医刊,2016,43(18):71-73.
    [9]王君慧,严伟,董翠萍,等.急性疼痛服务组织对开胸术后病人疼痛控制的方法与效果[J].护理管理杂志,2012,12(7):519-520.
    [10]莫春慧,叶翠萍.多样化健康教育对肺癌术后患者疼痛控制的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2017,14(10):78-79.
    [11]于海荣,严海霞,王丹丹.规范化疼痛管理在肺癌围手术期的应用[J].齐齐哈医学院学报,2015,36(26):4024-4025.
    [12]周萍.肺癌术后活动性疼痛护理评估对疼痛管理质量的影响[J].中国社区医师,2016,32(30):172-174.
    [13]金东振,信国玺,张艳丽,等.肺癌患者围术期呼吸道管理及其并发症[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(12):6967-6968.
    [14]曾莹,陈芳兰.呼吸道管理在老年晚期肺癌患者中的应用[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2014,17(3):469-471.
    [15]蔡晓慧,陈岩玲.肺癌患者术后疼痛护理干预研究[J].江苏科技信息,2017,3(1):77-78.