硅质原料矿床勘查类型划分——划分因素及划分方法探讨
|
摘要
作为矿产资源勘查评价的基础,矿床勘查类型划分的合理与否,直接决定勘查的成败及投资的多少。现行DZ/T 0207-2002《玻璃硅质原料饰面石材石膏温石棉硅灰石滑石石墨矿产地质勘查规范》实施以来,指导了玻璃及其他硅质原料矿床的勘查工作,十几年来的实践证明其具有普适性,但也有一定的局限性,如矿床勘查类型的划分。文章在收集大量硅质原料勘查及前人研究成果基础上,对现行勘查规范中的矿床勘查类型划分因素进行深入研究,充分继承现行勘查规范划分因素的优点,调整不适宜之处,并增加了矿床成因类型因素,提出6个矿床成因类型划分因素及权重,赋予相应类型系数。运用其对全国105个硅质原料矿床进行了勘查类型重新划分,有14个矿床勘查类型发生变化,通过对勘查类型改变的典型矿床进行验证显示调整后的划分可能更为合理。本文所讨论研究勘查类型划分内容是对硅质原料勘查技术要求体系完善研究的一次有益尝试,对今后硅质原料矿产勘查开发有一定的借鉴意义。
As the basis for the exploration and evaluation of mineral resources, the rationality of dividing exploration types directly determines the success or failure of exploration and the amount of investment. The current "DZ/T 0207-2002 Specifications for glass-grade silicon materials, ornamental stone, gypsum, chrysotile asbestos, wollastonite, talc and graphite exploration" has guided the exploration of glass and other silicon material deposits since its implementation. It is proved that it has universality for more than ten years, but also has certain limitations, such as the dividing of mineral exploration types. Based on the investigation of a large number of siliceous materials surveys and previous research results, the elements for dividing exploration types of glass silicon materials deposits in the current specifications were further studied, the advantages of the existing exploration specifications were fully inherited, and then the inadequacies were adjusted. After fully discussing the importance of the genesis of the deposits for exploration types, the genesis element been increased, and then six genetic elements for dividing exploration types have been proposed.With reference to the current specifications of using the method of coefficient assignment determine the weights of the elments and assign corresponding type factors. And that using 105 silicon material deposits to vetify the new method, and founding that only 14 deposits had changed. The verification results of typical deposits with altered exploration types show that the adjusted division may be more reasonable. Therefore, the research in this paper is a useful attempt to improve the technical requirements for the exploration of silicon materials. It can be used as a reference for the exploration and development of silicon materials in the future.
As the basis for the exploration and evaluation of mineral resources, the rationality of dividing exploration types directly determines the success or failure of exploration and the amount of investment. The current "DZ/T 0207-2002 Specifications for glass-grade silicon materials, ornamental stone, gypsum, chrysotile asbestos, wollastonite, talc and graphite exploration" has guided the exploration of glass and other silicon material deposits since its implementation. It is proved that it has universality for more than ten years, but also has certain limitations, such as the dividing of mineral exploration types. Based on the investigation of a large number of siliceous materials surveys and previous research results, the elements for dividing exploration types of glass silicon materials deposits in the current specifications were further studied, the advantages of the existing exploration specifications were fully inherited, and then the inadequacies were adjusted. After fully discussing the importance of the genesis of the deposits for exploration types, the genesis element been increased, and then six genetic elements for dividing exploration types have been proposed.With reference to the current specifications of using the method of coefficient assignment determine the weights of the elments and assign corresponding type factors. And that using 105 silicon material deposits to vetify the new method, and founding that only 14 deposits had changed. The verification results of typical deposits with altered exploration types show that the adjusted division may be more reasonable. Therefore, the research in this paper is a useful attempt to improve the technical requirements for the exploration of silicon materials. It can be used as a reference for the exploration and development of silicon materials in the future.
引文
[1]左仁广,夏庆霖.矿产勘查与评价中的风险与不确定性[J].矿床地质,2010,29(S1):769-770.
[2]徐云鹏.用数学方法研究矿床勘探类型—以磷矿床为例[J].湖北地质,1988(1):41-56.
[3]张廷勋.矿床勘探类型的数学地质研究[J].地质与勘探,1995(6):41-43.
[4]国土资源部.全国矿产资源储量通报(二〇一六年)[R].北京:国土资源部,2017.
[5]丁嘉榆,邓国庆.现行离子型稀土勘查规范存在的主要问题与修订建议[J].有色金属科学与工程,2013,4(4):96-102.
[6]胡魁.论矿产资源储量分类与勘查阶段的关系[J].地质与勘探,2002(3):64-69.
[7]胡魁.论矿产资源分类标准修订中的几个原则问题[J].资源与产业,2009,11(5):122-125.
[8]胡魁.固体矿产资源储量1999分类修订方案[J].中国矿业,2010,19(1):7-16.
[9]赵先良.实施《固体矿产资源/储量分类》和《固体矿产地质勘查规范总则》国家标准之我见[J].中国国土资源经济,2007(6):7-10,46.
[10]陶维屏.中国非金属矿床形成和分布的若干规律—中国的非金属矿床和板块构造[J].地质学报,1988(2):143-156.
[11]陶维屏.中国非金属矿床的成矿系列[J].地质学报,1989,63(4):324-337.
[12]陶维屏.中国的非金属矿床含矿建造[J].建材地质,1992(1):35-37,57.
[13]曹建劲,吴起俊,蔡昌瑛.分界粉石英矿床地质特征及成因初探[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),1997(36)(S1):92-95.
[14]吴时兴,邓富银.渝东粉石英矿地质特征及其应用[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2001(3):34-35.
[15]刘敦一,简平.大别山双河硬玉石英岩的超高压变质和退变质事件——SHRIMP测年的证据[J].地质学报,2004,78(2):211-217.
[16]司荣军,顾雪祥,杨道荣,等.山东崔家峪玻璃用石英砂岩矿床地质特征及成因[J].地质找矿论丛,2004(1):30-33.
[17]余志伟.云阳微结晶石英岩矿成因探讨[J].地质科技情报,2007(5):45-48.
[18]第五春荣,孙勇,袁洪林,等.河南登封地区嵩山石英岩碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学、Hf同位素组成及其地质意义[J].科学通报,2008,53(16):1923-1934.
[19]孙金彪.湖北白石冲脉石英矿床特征及其可选性试验研究[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2009(6):39-41.
[20]戴元毅.福建漳浦山门石英砂矿地质特征及成因探讨[J].福建地质,2010(2):111-114.
[21]方应贤,张洪.凤阳玻璃用石英岩矿地质特征及成因分析[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2010(6):52-54.
[22]付西珂.沂南石英砂岩地质特征及其开发利用[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2010(4):58-59.
[23]谢朝永,韩江伟,巴燕,等.河南省栾川县脉石英矿特征及找矿远景[J].化工矿产地质,2011,33(3):161-165.
[24]高继辉,欧阳友和,王言伟.临沂中北部地区脉石英成矿特征及找矿方向[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2015(6):35-37,57.
[25]戈金明.海南岛石英砂矿成矿机制浅析[J].西部探矿工程,2017,29(9):136-137,141.
[26]梁玉明,刘晓辉,卓志丽.湖南溆浦谭家湾石英砂岩矿床地质特征及成因浅析[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2017(1):49-51,55.
[27]赵亚辉,唐卫国,傅群和,等.矿床成因类型对铅锌矿床勘查类型划分的影响[J].地质学报,2016,90(10):2897-2907.
[28]毛党龙,傅群和,刘敏,等.成矿后构造破坏对矿床勘查类型的影响及勘查类型系数优化[J].地质与勘探,2017,53(5):960-967.
[29]万贵龙,苗琦,万会.我国矿床勘查类型划分及影响研究[J].现代矿业,2017(2):43-45,51.
[2]徐云鹏.用数学方法研究矿床勘探类型—以磷矿床为例[J].湖北地质,1988(1):41-56.
[3]张廷勋.矿床勘探类型的数学地质研究[J].地质与勘探,1995(6):41-43.
[4]国土资源部.全国矿产资源储量通报(二〇一六年)[R].北京:国土资源部,2017.
[5]丁嘉榆,邓国庆.现行离子型稀土勘查规范存在的主要问题与修订建议[J].有色金属科学与工程,2013,4(4):96-102.
[6]胡魁.论矿产资源储量分类与勘查阶段的关系[J].地质与勘探,2002(3):64-69.
[7]胡魁.论矿产资源分类标准修订中的几个原则问题[J].资源与产业,2009,11(5):122-125.
[8]胡魁.固体矿产资源储量1999分类修订方案[J].中国矿业,2010,19(1):7-16.
[9]赵先良.实施《固体矿产资源/储量分类》和《固体矿产地质勘查规范总则》国家标准之我见[J].中国国土资源经济,2007(6):7-10,46.
[10]陶维屏.中国非金属矿床形成和分布的若干规律—中国的非金属矿床和板块构造[J].地质学报,1988(2):143-156.
[11]陶维屏.中国非金属矿床的成矿系列[J].地质学报,1989,63(4):324-337.
[12]陶维屏.中国的非金属矿床含矿建造[J].建材地质,1992(1):35-37,57.
[13]曹建劲,吴起俊,蔡昌瑛.分界粉石英矿床地质特征及成因初探[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),1997(36)(S1):92-95.
[14]吴时兴,邓富银.渝东粉石英矿地质特征及其应用[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2001(3):34-35.
[15]刘敦一,简平.大别山双河硬玉石英岩的超高压变质和退变质事件——SHRIMP测年的证据[J].地质学报,2004,78(2):211-217.
[16]司荣军,顾雪祥,杨道荣,等.山东崔家峪玻璃用石英砂岩矿床地质特征及成因[J].地质找矿论丛,2004(1):30-33.
[17]余志伟.云阳微结晶石英岩矿成因探讨[J].地质科技情报,2007(5):45-48.
[18]第五春荣,孙勇,袁洪林,等.河南登封地区嵩山石英岩碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学、Hf同位素组成及其地质意义[J].科学通报,2008,53(16):1923-1934.
[19]孙金彪.湖北白石冲脉石英矿床特征及其可选性试验研究[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2009(6):39-41.
[20]戴元毅.福建漳浦山门石英砂矿地质特征及成因探讨[J].福建地质,2010(2):111-114.
[21]方应贤,张洪.凤阳玻璃用石英岩矿地质特征及成因分析[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2010(6):52-54.
[22]付西珂.沂南石英砂岩地质特征及其开发利用[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2010(4):58-59.
[23]谢朝永,韩江伟,巴燕,等.河南省栾川县脉石英矿特征及找矿远景[J].化工矿产地质,2011,33(3):161-165.
[24]高继辉,欧阳友和,王言伟.临沂中北部地区脉石英成矿特征及找矿方向[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2015(6):35-37,57.
[25]戈金明.海南岛石英砂矿成矿机制浅析[J].西部探矿工程,2017,29(9):136-137,141.
[26]梁玉明,刘晓辉,卓志丽.湖南溆浦谭家湾石英砂岩矿床地质特征及成因浅析[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2017(1):49-51,55.
[27]赵亚辉,唐卫国,傅群和,等.矿床成因类型对铅锌矿床勘查类型划分的影响[J].地质学报,2016,90(10):2897-2907.
[28]毛党龙,傅群和,刘敏,等.成矿后构造破坏对矿床勘查类型的影响及勘查类型系数优化[J].地质与勘探,2017,53(5):960-967.
[29]万贵龙,苗琦,万会.我国矿床勘查类型划分及影响研究[J].现代矿业,2017(2):43-45,51.