论王夫之庄学研究的儒学立场

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：On the Confucian Position of Wang Fuzhi's Academic Research about Zhuangzi 作者：李志旭 英文作者：LI Zhi-xu;Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Fudan University; 关键词：王夫之 ; 庄子 ; 庄学研究 ; 儒学立场 英文关键词：Wang Fuzhi;;Zhuangzi;;academic research about Zhuangzi;;Confucian position 中文刊名：DSYZ 英文刊名：Journal of Taiyuan Normal University(Social Science Edition) 机构：复旦大学中文系; 出版日期：2019-05-15 出版单位：太原师范学院学报(社会科学版) 年：2019 期：v.18;No.95 语种：中文; 页：DSYZ201903001 页数：7 CN：03 ISSN：14-1303/C 分类号：6-12

摘要

在明末清初的社会大变革之际,庄学研究开始逐渐走出宋明理学的樊篱。某种意义上,王夫之的庄学研究(《庄子通》和《庄子解》)重新回到《庄子》文本,建构了其自身"以庄解庄"的阐释方法。然而,作为一个毕生致力于儒学尤其是经学研究的大儒者,王夫之个人对《庄子》的阐释实际上带有深层的儒学立场。
        After the social transformation between Ming and Qing Dynasties,the academic research about Zhuangzi was no longer fenced by Neo-Confucianism. In his two books of interpreting Zhuangzi,Wang Fuzhi focused on the text of Zhuangzi again in his research so that he constructed his own method of interpreting Zhuangzi in Zhuangzi's way. However,as a Confucian who devoted to Confucianism study in his whole life,Wang expounded his Confucian position invariably in his academic research about Zhuangzi.

引文

[1]赵尔巽.清史稿[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
    [2]王夫之.老子衍;庄子通;庄子解[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
    [3]彭玉麟,殷家儁(主编).衡阳县志[M].台北:成文出版社,1970.
    [4]王夫之.王船山诗文集[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
    [5]郭庆藩(辑).庄子集释[M].北京:中华书局,1961.
    [6]许慎.说文解字[M].北京:中华书局,1963.
    [7]段玉裁.说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981.
    [8]吴立民,徐荪铭.船山佛道思想研究[M].长沙:湖南出版社,1992.
    [9]永瑢,纪昀(主编).四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
    [10]中研院历史语言研究所.中研院历史语言研究所集刊论文类编:思想与文化编[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
    [11]中华书局编辑部.四部备要(第61册)[M].北京:中华书局,1989.
    [12]王夫之(撰),严寿澂(导读).船山思问录[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2000.
    [13]王夫之.船山遗书(第12冊)[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2011.
    [14]中华书局编辑部.四部备要(第62册)[M].北京:中华书局,1989.