基于作战效能的军用飞机维修与保障
|
摘要
与民用飞机相比,军用飞机的维修与保障始终是以恢复、保持和提高作战效能为根本目的,并在此基础上寻求最佳的经济性。从作战效能的定义出发,建立了作战效能的广义模型;而后,提出了基于作战效能的维修与保障的概念,阐述了基于作战效能的维修与保障内涵,给出了基于作战效能的维修与保障实施流程,并进行了举例说明;最后,针对基于作战效能的维修与保障的几个关键问题进行了探讨。通过实施基于作战效能的维修与保障,可以将作战效能与维修保障活动的关系通过数学模型进行量化,从而优化维修与保障活动,实现军用飞机作战效能的最大化。
Compared with the civil aircraft, the restoring, maintaining and improving based on the combat effectiveness must always be taken as the fundamental purpose, and simultaneously, the seeking for the best economy must also be taken into consideration in the whole process of the maintenance and the support for the military aircraft. In this paper, a generalized model of combat effectiveness is established firstly based on the definition of combat effectiveness, and a concept named Combat Effectiveness Based Maintenance and Support(CEBM&S) is put forward. The connotation of the CEBM&S is expounded, and an application process of the CEBM&S is proposed, and an example is given. Finally, there are two key problems of the CEBM&S to be discussed. By applying the CEBM&S, the relationship between the combat effectiveness and the maintenance & support activities can be quantified by a mathematical model, and then the combat effectiveness can be maximized by optimizing the maintenance and support process.
Compared with the civil aircraft, the restoring, maintaining and improving based on the combat effectiveness must always be taken as the fundamental purpose, and simultaneously, the seeking for the best economy must also be taken into consideration in the whole process of the maintenance and the support for the military aircraft. In this paper, a generalized model of combat effectiveness is established firstly based on the definition of combat effectiveness, and a concept named Combat Effectiveness Based Maintenance and Support(CEBM&S) is put forward. The connotation of the CEBM&S is expounded, and an application process of the CEBM&S is proposed, and an example is given. Finally, there are two key problems of the CEBM&S to be discussed. By applying the CEBM&S, the relationship between the combat effectiveness and the maintenance & support activities can be quantified by a mathematical model, and then the combat effectiveness can be maximized by optimizing the maintenance and support process.
引文
[1] DEKKER R, WILDEMAN R E, FRANK A,et al. A Review of Multi-Component Maintenance Models with Cconomic Dependence[J]. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 1997, 45(3): 411-435.
[2] PARK G P, YOON Y T. Application of Ordinal Optimization on Reliability Centered Maintenance of Distribution System[J]. European Transactions on Electrical Power, 2012, 22(3): 391-401.
[3] JARDINE A K S, LIN D M, BANJEVIC D. A Review on Machinery Diagnostics and Prognostics Implementing Condition-Based Maintenance[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20(7): 1483-1510.
[4] NGUYEN K A, DO P, GRALL A. Multi-Level Predictive Maintenance for Multi-Component Systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 144: 83-94.
[5] 马绍民, 章国栋, 刘用权, 等. 综合保障工程[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1995. MA S M, ZHANG G D, LIU Y Q, et al. Comprehensive Support Engineering[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1995.(in Chinese)
[6] 朱宝鎏, 朱荣昌, 熊笑非. 作战飞机效能评估[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2006. ZHU B L, ZHU R C, XIONG X F. Combat Aircraft Effectiveness Evaluation[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2006.(in Chinese)
[7] 张恒喜, 刘晓东, 段宝君, 等. 现代飞机效费分析[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2001. ZHANG H X, LIU X D, DUAN B J, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Modern Aircraft[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2001.(in Chinese)
[8] ZHANG G F, QIAO X M, LUO M, et al. Effectiveness Evaluation Model of Fixed Wing UAV Based on the Improved ADC Model[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems. Beijing, 2017: 288-292.
[9] 杜晓明, 古平, 高鲁, 等. 基于仿真的装备故障效能评估[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2017. DU X M, GU P, GAO L, et al. Effectiveness Evaluation of Equipment Support Based on Simulation[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2017.(in Chinese)
[10] 韩坤, 何成铭, 刘维维, 等. 以系统效能为目标的装甲车辆可靠性、维修性、保障性和测试性权衡分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(2): 268-272. HAN K, HE C M, LIU W W, et al. Trade-Off Analysis of Reliability / Maintainability / Supportability / Testability of Armored Vehicle Based on System Effectiveness[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(2): 268-272.(in Chinese)
[2] PARK G P, YOON Y T. Application of Ordinal Optimization on Reliability Centered Maintenance of Distribution System[J]. European Transactions on Electrical Power, 2012, 22(3): 391-401.
[3] JARDINE A K S, LIN D M, BANJEVIC D. A Review on Machinery Diagnostics and Prognostics Implementing Condition-Based Maintenance[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20(7): 1483-1510.
[4] NGUYEN K A, DO P, GRALL A. Multi-Level Predictive Maintenance for Multi-Component Systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 144: 83-94.
[5] 马绍民, 章国栋, 刘用权, 等. 综合保障工程[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1995. MA S M, ZHANG G D, LIU Y Q, et al. Comprehensive Support Engineering[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1995.(in Chinese)
[6] 朱宝鎏, 朱荣昌, 熊笑非. 作战飞机效能评估[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2006. ZHU B L, ZHU R C, XIONG X F. Combat Aircraft Effectiveness Evaluation[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2006.(in Chinese)
[7] 张恒喜, 刘晓东, 段宝君, 等. 现代飞机效费分析[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2001. ZHANG H X, LIU X D, DUAN B J, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Modern Aircraft[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2001.(in Chinese)
[8] ZHANG G F, QIAO X M, LUO M, et al. Effectiveness Evaluation Model of Fixed Wing UAV Based on the Improved ADC Model[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems. Beijing, 2017: 288-292.
[9] 杜晓明, 古平, 高鲁, 等. 基于仿真的装备故障效能评估[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2017. DU X M, GU P, GAO L, et al. Effectiveness Evaluation of Equipment Support Based on Simulation[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2017.(in Chinese)
[10] 韩坤, 何成铭, 刘维维, 等. 以系统效能为目标的装甲车辆可靠性、维修性、保障性和测试性权衡分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(2): 268-272. HAN K, HE C M, LIU W W, et al. Trade-Off Analysis of Reliability / Maintainability / Supportability / Testability of Armored Vehicle Based on System Effectiveness[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(2): 268-272.(in Chinese)