用户名: 密码: 验证码:
浦东和虹桥机场一次大雾过程对比分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative Analysis of a Heavy Fog Process at Pudong and Hongqiao Airports
  • 作者:吴妍
  • 英文作者:WU Yan;East China Air Traffic Management Bureau of CAAC;
  • 关键词:平流雾 ; 航空气象报文 ; 机场警报 ; 预报检验 ; 大面积航班延误响应机制
  • 英文关键词:advection fog;;aviation weather report;;airport warnings;;forecasting verification;;MDRS
  • 中文刊名:MHXE
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Civil Aviation
  • 机构:中国民用航空华东地区空中交通管理局;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-25
  • 出版单位:民航学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.3
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:MHXE201902006
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:10-1526/V
  • 分类号:26-29
摘要
本文利用连续性和准确度较高的机场气象要素探测资料,在处理和解析民用航空气象报文和机场警报的基础上,分析了2016年1月27~表明:1)浦东和虹桥机场的预报与实况报文的绝对误差均呈现明显的正态分布,并且浦东比虹桥机场预报准确率偏高;2)浦东机场对于云高位于30~准确,提前量较高,但对于云高小于30 m和主导能见度400~600 m区间的机场警报内容与实况偏差较大,缺乏提前量;3)虹桥机场对于28日03:30~10:30能见度低于800 m的机场警报内容准确,提前量较高,但对于28日11:00主导能见度大于1 000 m的机场警报缺乏提前量。
        Based on the processing and analysis of aviation weather reports and warnings, the weather service effects for a typical severe fog in Shanghai on January 27-28, 2016 are analysed by using the airport weather observing data with high continuity and accuracy. It shows that: 1) absolute errors of forecast and reality at Pudong and Hongqiao show obvious normal distribution, and the accuracy of Pudong is higher than Hongqiao; 2) for the Pudong airport warnings, the warning accuracy and leading time of cloud height ranging from 30 to 60 meters are higher than that of cloud height less than 30 meters, and there is a same result when comparing the visibility ranging from 600 to 800 meters with visibility ranging from 400 to 600 meters; 3) for the Hongqiao Airport warnings on January 28 th, the accuracy and leading time of visibility less than 800 meters between 03: 30 and 10: 30 are higher than visibility more than1 000 meters at 11: 00.
引文
[1]任国玉,郭军,徐铭志,等.近50年中国地面气候变化基本特征[J].气象学报, 2005, 63(6):942-956.
    [2]王大钧,陈列,丁裕国.近40年来中国降水量、雨日变化趋势及与全球温度变化的关系[J].热带气象学报,2006, 22(3):283-290.
    [3] Wu D, Tie X X, Li C C, et al. An extremely low visibility event over the Guangzhou region:A case study[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(35):6568-6570.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700