用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于灰色评价法的云南省有机产品认证质量评价研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:An Evaluation Research on the Quality Accreditation of Yunnan Organic Product Based on Grey Evaluation Method
  • 作者:刘兰凯 ; 韩燕 ; 李键
  • 英文作者:LIU Lankai;HAN Yan;LI Jian;Quality Development Institute,Kunming University of Science and Technology;
  • 关键词:有机认证 ; 灰色评价 ; 评价指标
  • 英文关键词:Yunnan Province;;organic certification;;Gray rating;;evaluation index
  • 中文刊名:KMLS
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Science)
  • 机构:昆明理工大学管理与经济学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 出版单位:昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.19;No.113
  • 基金:云南省科技厅项目“有机认证推动云南高原特色农业集群品牌建设模式研究”(2014RD025);; 昆明理工大学人文社会科学研究培育项目“有机认证推动云南高原特色农业发展过程中的经济效益及其影响因素分析研究”(KKZ3201758017);昆明理工大学人文社会科学研究培育项目“标准必要专利及其法律规制问题研究”
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KMLS201903011
  • 页数:7
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:53-1160/C
  • 分类号:81-87
摘要
基于云南省"有机产品认证示范创建区"的调查数据,运用主成分分析和灰色评价法,研究云南省有机产品认证质量。结果表明:以评价值C (C=4,3,2,1,代表"较好、好、一般、差")为基准,云南省有机认证质量评价值为2. 818,表示其处于由"一般"向"较好"转变的过渡阶段。有机生产行为不规范、认证机构的认证质量难保障、政府等部门监管不到位是目前云南省有机产业发展需要关注的重要问题。结合现状,云南应建立有机认证行业自治机制,加强行业诚信体系建设,拓展有机认证社会监督渠道,完善监督问责机制,落实责任连带机制,强化风险识别与管控。
        Based on the survey data of "Organic Product Accreditation Demonstration Zone"in Yunnan Province,this paper studies the quality of organic product certification by using principal component analysis and gray evaluation method. The results show that with C( C = 1,2,3,4,represents"very good,good,average,poor") as the evaluation benchmark,the quality evaluation value of organic certification implementation in Yunnan Province is 2. 818,which means it is in the transitional stage from "general"to "better". The quality of management of organic certification is better than the quality of supervision,but there are still a large number of violations in the organic production process. The supervision of the government and certification bodies are not adequately effective,and the non-standard organic production process remains the main problem in the implementation of the organic certification in Yunnan Province. Aiming at solving these difficulties,the paper puts forward such countermeasures and suggestions as follows: establishing an autonomous mechanism for organic certification industry; strengthening the construction of industry credit system; expanding the social supervision channel for organic certification; improving the supervision and accountability mechanism; implementing the responsibility and joint mechanism and strengthening risk identification and control.
引文
[1]FIBL,IFOAM. The World of Organic Agriculture Statistics&Emerging Trends,2017[R/OL](2017-09-20)[2018-08-14]. http://www. ooganic-world. net/yearbook/yearfook-2017. html.
    [2]单吉堃.认证制度的建构与有机农业发展[J].学习与探索,2004(4):81-86.
    [3]韩燕,刘兰凯,张彪.有机认证过程中的策略选择对有机食品消费者信任的影响[J].信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,38(1):54-58.
    [4]王太文.有机农业产业国内研究综述[J].山西农业科学,2015,43(3):356-361.
    [5]齐静,孙玉涛,常郝.中国有机农业现存问题及发展对策[J].现代农业科技,2016(20).
    [6]LOHR L. Implications of Organic Certification for Market Structure and Trade[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1998,80(5):1125-1129.
    [7]JULIE G. Back to the Land:the Paradox of Organic Food Standards[J],Environment and Planning A,2004,36(2):25-30.
    [8]BARRETT H R,BROWNE A W,HARRIS PJC. Organic Certification and the UK Market:Organic Imports From Developing Countries[J]. 2007(23):301-318.
    [9]孙菁,孙文莫,陈祯,等.云南有机农产品认证现状与分析[J].安徽农业科学,2015(10).
    [10]黎斌林,康丕菊,黄丹,等.中国有机产品认证与监管问题研究——基于云南省有机农业市场培育视角[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(23):211-214.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700