管理视角下数字信息资源长期保存元数据研究进展
|
摘要
[目的/意义]保存元数据是解决数字信息资源长期保存问题的关键要素。通过系统梳理保存元数据当前最新研究进展,可以把握研究趋势,为进一步深入研究提供参考。[研究设计/方法]从管理视角出发,围绕保存元数据的概念、PREMIS保存元数据标准框架和保存元数据质量评估,系统梳理了数字信息资源长期保存元数据的研究进展。[结论/发现]对保存元数据的概念研究主要从功能、类别和目标三个角度进行界定;保存元数据核心框架标准PREMIS使得保存元数据实现了从理论探讨到实施操作的转变,研究更多地聚焦于如何将PREMIS应用于不同领域的数字信息资源长期保存;在保存元数据质量评估方面,除了参考不同元数据标准保障保存元数据质量,以及借鉴多种元数据质量评估方法开展保存元数据生成和维护的质量评估,还需要根据不同机构的长期保存需求和资源特点来设计专门的保存元数据质量评估指标体系。[创新/价值]从管理视角系统梳理了国内外数字信息资源长期保存元数据的研究进展,为我国数字信息资源的长期保存研究和实践提供参考。
[Purpose/Significance]Preservation metadata is the key factor to solve the problem of long-term preservation of digital information resources. [Design/Methodology]From the perspective of management, this paper systematically reviews the research process of long-term preservation metadata from the aspects of conception, framework and quality assessment. [Findings/Conclusion]The concept research of preservation metadata is mainly defined from three perspectives: function, category and targe. As the core framework for preservation metadata, PREMIS makes the preservation metadata realize the transition from theoretical discussion to practical implementation, and current research focuses more on how to apply PREMIS to digital information resources in different fields; In the aspect of quality assessment of preservation metadata, besides referring to different metadata standards to ensure the quality of preservation metadata and referring to various metadata quality assessment methods to carry out quality assessment of the generation and maintenance of preserved metadata, it is also necessary to design specific preservation metadata quality assessment index systems according to the long-term preservation needs and resource characteristics of different institutions. [Originality/Value]From the perspective of management, the research progress of long-term preservation metadata of digital information resources at home and abroad has been reviewed, which could provide reference for the long-term preservation research and practice of digital information resources in China.
[Purpose/Significance]Preservation metadata is the key factor to solve the problem of long-term preservation of digital information resources. [Design/Methodology]From the perspective of management, this paper systematically reviews the research process of long-term preservation metadata from the aspects of conception, framework and quality assessment. [Findings/Conclusion]The concept research of preservation metadata is mainly defined from three perspectives: function, category and targe. As the core framework for preservation metadata, PREMIS makes the preservation metadata realize the transition from theoretical discussion to practical implementation, and current research focuses more on how to apply PREMIS to digital information resources in different fields; In the aspect of quality assessment of preservation metadata, besides referring to different metadata standards to ensure the quality of preservation metadata and referring to various metadata quality assessment methods to carry out quality assessment of the generation and maintenance of preserved metadata, it is also necessary to design specific preservation metadata quality assessment index systems according to the long-term preservation needs and resource characteristics of different institutions. [Originality/Value]From the perspective of management, the research progress of long-term preservation metadata of digital information resources at home and abroad has been reviewed, which could provide reference for the long-term preservation research and practice of digital information resources in China.
引文
1 P?oszajski G.Metadata in Long-Term Digital Preservation[M]// Traczyk T ,W?odzimierz Ogryczak,Piotr Pa?ka,et al.Digital Preservation:Putting It to Work.New York:Springer International Publishing,2017:15-61.
2,14 OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata.Preservation Metadata for Digital Objects:A Review of the State of the Art[EB /OL].[2017-09-13].http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/presmeta_wp.pdf.
3 National Information Standards Organization.NISO Webinar:Metadata for Preservation:A Digital Object's Best Friend[EB/OL].[2017-09-14].https://www.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/niso-webinar-metadata-for-preservation-a-digital-objects-best-friend-16512979.
4,70 Dappert A,Guenther R S,Peyrard S.Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners[M].New York:Springer International Publishing,2016:13-22.
5 Johnson D,Mullins J.Filling In the Gaps:Missing Preservation Metadata:A Report of the ALCTS PARS Preservation Metadata Interest Group Meeting[J].Technical Services Quarterly,2018,35(3):280-282.
6,30,43 刘建华,张智雄.保存元数据的发展趋势研究[J].图书馆杂志,2016(6):10-16.
7,44,48 刘建华.数字保存元数据体系[EB/OL].[2017-09-26].http://www.irgrid.ac.cn/handle/1471x/928850.
8,20 Day M.Issues and Approaches to Preservation Metadata[C]//Joint RLG and NPO Preservation Conference:Guidelines for Digital Imaging.UK,Coventry,1998.
9,27,69 Brain L,Richard G.Preservation Metadata (2nd edition)[EB/OL].[2017-09-14].http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/twr13-03.
10 张民.科研数据的迁移和保存元数据研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2013.
11 肖希明.图书馆学研究进展[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007:668.
12,39 OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation.Preservation Metadata and the OAIS Information Model—A Metadata Framework to Support the Preservation of Digital Objects[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf.
13 王军.保存型元数据研究[J].图书馆理论与实践,2006(5):30-32.
15 盛小平.数字信息长期保存的元数据研究[J].情报学报,2002(4):450-457.
16 Ruusalepp R.AHDS Preservation Metadata Framework-Recommended AHDS Preservation Metadata Schema (Final Version)[EB/OL][2018-06-22].http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.882.624&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
17 牛金芳,吴开华.论保存元数据[J].大学图书馆学报,2002,2(2):67-70.
18 秦将华.医学图书馆数字资源长期保存技术应用框架研究[D].北京:中国人民解放军军事医学科学院,2011.
19,38 PREMIS Editorial Committee.PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata(Version 3.0)[R/OL].[2017-09-28].http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf.
21,32,54 刘志.PREMIS保存元数据与数字资源长期保存研究[D].湘潭:湘潭大学,2009.
22 罗毅.数字信息资源长期保存的主要问题及研究进展[J].信息资源管理学报,2014(2):22-36.
23 Segawa S.Managing Technical and Administrative Metadata in the Preservation of Digital Information[D].Sweden:Lulea University of Technology,2015.
24,47 丁亮.数字资源长期保存元数据:PREMIS以及和METS的结合使用[J].无线互联科技,2013(11):177-178,188.
25 肖珑,赵亮.中文元数据概论与实例[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2007:11.
26 刘家真.电子文件管理——电子文件与证据保留[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:135-137.
28 Vermaaten S,Lavoie B,Caplan P.Identifying Threats to Successful Digital Preservation:The SPOT Model for Risk Assessment[J].D-Lib Magazine,2012(18):14-25.
29 张智雄.数字保存是数字时代信息中心的一项重要战略[EB/OL].[2017-09-15].http://wenku.baidu.com/view/a9f4e2a30066f5335a8121bd.html.
31 宛玲,张晓林.数字资源长期保存中的合作管理元数据设计探讨[J].图书情报知识,2004(1):55-57.
33,40 敖毅.OCLC/RLG保存元数据简介[J].数字图书馆论坛,2005(10):37-44.
34 Preservation Metadata for Digital Objects:A Review of the State of the Art,A White Paper by the OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/presmeta_wp.pdf.
35 秦金聚.数字信息保存元数据研究进展及启示[J].情报理论与实践,2007,30(2):284-288.
36 张智雄等.数字资源长期保存技术的研究与实践[M].国家图书馆出版社,2015:411-423.
37 Dappert A.Digital Preservation Metadata and Improvements to PREMIS in Version 3.0[EB/OL].[2017-09-25].https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/tutorialslides.pdf.
41 高嵩,张智雄.PREMIS保存元数据体系分析[J].现代图书情报技术,2006(4):19-23,52.
42 刘志,肖文建,沈丽.PREMIS保存元数据及其对我国的启示[J].图书馆学研究,2009(2):18-22.
45 Caplan P,Guenther R S.Practical Preservation:The PREMIS Experience[J].Library Trends,2005,54(1):111-124.
46 Guenther R S,Dappert A,Peyrard S.An Introduction to the PREMIS Data Dictionary for Digital Preservation Metadata[M]// Dappert A,Guenther R S,Peyrard S.Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners.New York:Springer International Publishing,2016:23-36.
49 Park O N.A Study on Developing Preservation Metadata Based on PREMIS Focusing on Digital Data in National Library of Korea[J].Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science,2012,46(2).
50 Askhoj J,Sugimoto S,Nagamori M.A Metadata Framework for Cloud-based Digital Archives Using METS with PREMIS[M]//Xing C,Cresta F,Rauber A.Digital Libraries:For Cultural Heritage,Knowledge Dissemination,and Future Creation.Berlin:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,2011:118-127.
51 PREMIS Editorial Committee.PREMIS Usage Examples [EB/OL].[2018-06-26].https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/examples.html.
52 PREMIS Editorial Committee.Guidelines for Using PREMIS with METS for Exchange [EB/OL].[2018-06-26].http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis-mets.html.
53 张民.科研数据的迁移和保存元数据研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2013.
55 姜爱蓉.国家数字图书馆长期保存元数据规范与应用指南[M].国家图书馆出版社,2014:12-34.
56 刘越男,杨建梁.面向电子文件保存的统一元数据模型的构建[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(2):66-79.
57 Dappert A,Enders M.Using METS,PREMIS and MODS for Archiving eJournals[J].D-Lib Magazine,2008(14):21-30.
58 Romaniuk L.Metadata for a Web Archive:PREMIS and XMP as Tools for the Task[J/OL].Library Philosophy & Practice,2014(2):7 [2018-06-26].https://search.proquest.com/docview/1738006250/C1DFC5567B4945D1PQ/7 accountid=15157.
59 Duerr R,Weaver R,Parsons M A.A New Approach to Preservation Metadata for Scientific Data – A Real World Example[M]// Standard-Based Data and Information Systems for Earth Observation.Berlin:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,2010:305-308.
60 Recker A,Müller S.Preserving the Essence:Identifying the Significant Properties of Social Science Research Data[J].New Review of Information Networking,2015,20(1-2):229-235.
61 Moon J Y,Kim T S.A Study on Contents Model for Business Records by the Application of the PREMIS Data Model[J].Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management,2011,28(1):43-68.
62 Bunawan A A,Nordin S,Haron H.A Model for Preserving the Electronic Records Event History Metadata in Malaysia Government Agencies[C]// Seventh International Conference on Computational Intelligence,Modelling and Simulation.Kuantan,Malaysia,2016.
63 Donaldson D R,Conway P.Implementing PREMIS:A Case Study of the Florida Digital Archive[J].Library Hi Tech,2010,28(2):273-289.
64 Qarabolaq Z F,Inallou M S,Hafezi H A,et al.The Role of PREMIS Preservation Metadata in Information Management in Virtual Museums[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013(73):396-402.
65 Hitchcock S,Brody T,Hey J M N,et al.Preservation Metadata for Institutional Repositories:Applying PREMIS[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].http://preserv.eprints.org/papers/presmeta/presmeta-paper.html.
66 Askhoj J,Sugimoto S,Nagamori M.Developing an Ontology for Cloud-based Archive Systems[J].International Journal of Metadata Semantics & Ontologies,2015,10(1):133-146.
67 Gerrard D M,Mooney J E,Thompson D.Digital Preservation at Big Data Scales:Proposing a Step-change in Preservation System Architectures[J].Library Hi Tech,2018,36(3):524-538.
68 Jordan M,Mclellan E.PREMIS in Open-Source Software:Islandora and Archivematica[M]// Dappert A,Guenther R S,Peyrard S.Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners.New York:Springer International Publishing,2016:227-239.
71 刘家真,廖茹.电子文件管理元数据的质量控制与管理[J].图书情报知识,2009(6):91-96.
72 程颖.数字资源元数据质量管理的研究与探索[J].图书馆,2015(7):66-69,104.
73 蒋引娣.元数据质量评价研究[J].图书馆理论与实践,2009(5):39-41.
74 曹月珍,马建玲.国内外元数据质量控制的研究进展与发展趋势[J].图书与情报,2013(6):101-104.
75 Bruce T.R,Hillman D.I..TheContinuum of Metadata Quality:Defining,Expressing,Exploiting[M]// Hillmann D.,Weatbrooks E.L.Metadata in Practice.Chicago:American Library Association,2004:238-256.
76 Directory of Open AccessRepositories.OpenDOAR [EB/OL].[2017-09-29].http://opendoar.org/.
77,96 黄如花,邱春艳.数字信息资源长期保存元数据的管理策略[J].信息资源管理学报,2014(2):58-64.
78 Peyrard S,Angela D,Rebecca S.G.How to Develop a Digital Preservation Metadata Profile:Risk and Requirements Analysis[M]// Dappert A,Guenther R S,Peyrard S.Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners.New York:Springer International Publishing,2016:11-21.
79 林爱群.机构知识库元数据的自动生成与评估研究[J].图书馆学研究,2009(7):10,21-23.
80 黄莺,李建阳.元数据质量评估方法及模型研究[J].图书馆学研究,2013(12):51,52-56.
81 Moen W E,Stewart E L,McClure C R.Assessing Metadata Quality:Findings and Methodological Considerations from an Evaluation of the US Government Information Locator Service(GILS)[C]//Proceedings IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries,IEEE,1998.
82 Bruce T R,Hillman D I.The Continuum of Metadata Quality:Defining,Expressing,Exploiting[C]// Hillmann D,Weatbrooks E L.Metadata in Practice.Chicago:American Library Association,2004,238-256.
83 Ochoa X,Duval E.AutomaticEvaluation of Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories[J].International Journal on Digital Libraries,2009,10(2-3):67-91.
84 Chen Y N,Wen C Y,Chen H P,et al.Metrics for Metadata Quality Assurance and Their Implications for Digital Libraries[M]// Xing C,Cresta F,Rauber A.Digital Libraries:For Cultural Heritage,Knowledge Dissemination,and Future Creation.Berlin:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,2011:138-147.
85 Trippel T,Broeder D,Durco M,et al.Towards Automatic Quality Assessment of Component Metadata[C]// 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation,Reykjavík,Iceland,2014.
86 Stvilia B,Gasser L.Value-based Metadata Quality Assessment[J].Library & Information Science Research,2008,30(1):67-74.
87 Margaritopoulos T,Margaritopoulos M,Mavridis I,et al.A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment[C]//Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications,Berlin,Germany,2008.
88 Park J.Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories:A Survey of the Current State of the Art[J].Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,2009,47(3-4):213-228.
89 Bellini E,Nesi P.Metadata Quality Assessment Tool for Open Access Cultural Heritage Institutional Repositories[M]//Nesi P,Santucci R(Eds.).Information Technologies for Performing Arts,Media Access,and Entertainment.New York:Springer International Publishing,2013:90-103.
90 Reiche K J,H?fig E.Implementation of Metadata Quality Metrics and Application on Public Government Data[C]// 2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference,IEEE,2013.
91 Bui Y,Park J R.An Assessment of Metadata Quality:A Case Study of the National Science Digital Library Metadata Repository[C]// Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS/Actes du congrès annuel de l’ACSI,Toronto,Canada,2006.
92 Sboui T,Salehi M,Bédard Y,et al.Towards a Quantitative Evaluation of Geospatial Metadata Quality in the Context of Semantic Interoperability[C]// 6th International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality 2009,Newfoundland,Canada,2009.
93 Chassanoff A M.Metadata Quality Evaluation in Institutional Repositories:A Survey of Current Practices[D].Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,2009.
94 Van Hooland S.Metadata Quality in the Cultural Heritage Sector:Stakes,Problems and Solutions[D].Belgium:Université Libre de Bruxelles,2009.
95 Alemneh D G.Metadata Quality Assessment:A Phased Approach to Ensuring Long-term Access to Digital Resources[EB/OL].[2017-09-29].https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460380.
97 林爱群.机构知识库元数据的自动生成与评估研究[J].图书馆学研究,2009(7):21-23.
98 黄莺.元数据质量的定量评估方法综述[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(4):143-148.
99 曹月珍,马建玲.国内外元数据质量控制的研究进展与发展趋势[J].图书与情报,2013(6):101-104.
100,101 黄莺,李建阳.元数据质量评估研究现状剖析[J].中国电子商务,2013(4):164-165.
2,14 OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata.Preservation Metadata for Digital Objects:A Review of the State of the Art[EB /OL].[2017-09-13].http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/presmeta_wp.pdf.
3 National Information Standards Organization.NISO Webinar:Metadata for Preservation:A Digital Object's Best Friend[EB/OL].[2017-09-14].https://www.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/niso-webinar-metadata-for-preservation-a-digital-objects-best-friend-16512979.
4,70 Dappert A,Guenther R S,Peyrard S.Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners[M].New York:Springer International Publishing,2016:13-22.
5 Johnson D,Mullins J.Filling In the Gaps:Missing Preservation Metadata:A Report of the ALCTS PARS Preservation Metadata Interest Group Meeting[J].Technical Services Quarterly,2018,35(3):280-282.
6,30,43 刘建华,张智雄.保存元数据的发展趋势研究[J].图书馆杂志,2016(6):10-16.
7,44,48 刘建华.数字保存元数据体系[EB/OL].[2017-09-26].http://www.irgrid.ac.cn/handle/1471x/928850.
8,20 Day M.Issues and Approaches to Preservation Metadata[C]//Joint RLG and NPO Preservation Conference:Guidelines for Digital Imaging.UK,Coventry,1998.
9,27,69 Brain L,Richard G.Preservation Metadata (2nd edition)[EB/OL].[2017-09-14].http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/twr13-03.
10 张民.科研数据的迁移和保存元数据研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2013.
11 肖希明.图书馆学研究进展[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007:668.
12,39 OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation.Preservation Metadata and the OAIS Information Model—A Metadata Framework to Support the Preservation of Digital Objects[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf.
13 王军.保存型元数据研究[J].图书馆理论与实践,2006(5):30-32.
15 盛小平.数字信息长期保存的元数据研究[J].情报学报,2002(4):450-457.
16 Ruusalepp R.AHDS Preservation Metadata Framework-Recommended AHDS Preservation Metadata Schema (Final Version)[EB/OL][2018-06-22].http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.882.624&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
17 牛金芳,吴开华.论保存元数据[J].大学图书馆学报,2002,2(2):67-70.
18 秦将华.医学图书馆数字资源长期保存技术应用框架研究[D].北京:中国人民解放军军事医学科学院,2011.
19,38 PREMIS Editorial Committee.PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata(Version 3.0)[R/OL].[2017-09-28].http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf.
21,32,54 刘志.PREMIS保存元数据与数字资源长期保存研究[D].湘潭:湘潭大学,2009.
22 罗毅.数字信息资源长期保存的主要问题及研究进展[J].信息资源管理学报,2014(2):22-36.
23 Segawa S.Managing Technical and Administrative Metadata in the Preservation of Digital Information[D].Sweden:Lulea University of Technology,2015.
24,47 丁亮.数字资源长期保存元数据:PREMIS以及和METS的结合使用[J].无线互联科技,2013(11):177-178,188.
25 肖珑,赵亮.中文元数据概论与实例[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2007:11.
26 刘家真.电子文件管理——电子文件与证据保留[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:135-137.
28 Vermaaten S,Lavoie B,Caplan P.Identifying Threats to Successful Digital Preservation:The SPOT Model for Risk Assessment[J].D-Lib Magazine,2012(18):14-25.
29 张智雄.数字保存是数字时代信息中心的一项重要战略[EB/OL].[2017-09-15].http://wenku.baidu.com/view/a9f4e2a30066f5335a8121bd.html.
31 宛玲,张晓林.数字资源长期保存中的合作管理元数据设计探讨[J].图书情报知识,2004(1):55-57.
33,40 敖毅.OCLC/RLG保存元数据简介[J].数字图书馆论坛,2005(10):37-44.
34 Preservation Metadata for Digital Objects:A Review of the State of the Art,A White Paper by the OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/presmeta_wp.pdf.
35 秦金聚.数字信息保存元数据研究进展及启示[J].情报理论与实践,2007,30(2):284-288.
36 张智雄等.数字资源长期保存技术的研究与实践[M].国家图书馆出版社,2015:411-423.
37 Dappert A.Digital Preservation Metadata and Improvements to PREMIS in Version 3.0[EB/OL].[2017-09-25].https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/tutorialslides.pdf.
41 高嵩,张智雄.PREMIS保存元数据体系分析[J].现代图书情报技术,2006(4):19-23,52.
42 刘志,肖文建,沈丽.PREMIS保存元数据及其对我国的启示[J].图书馆学研究,2009(2):18-22.
45 Caplan P,Guenther R S.Practical Preservation:The PREMIS Experience[J].Library Trends,2005,54(1):111-124.
46 Guenther R S,Dappert A,Peyrard S.An Introduction to the PREMIS Data Dictionary for Digital Preservation Metadata[M]// Dappert A,Guenther R S,Peyrard S.Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners.New York:Springer International Publishing,2016:23-36.
49 Park O N.A Study on Developing Preservation Metadata Based on PREMIS Focusing on Digital Data in National Library of Korea[J].Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science,2012,46(2).
50 Askhoj J,Sugimoto S,Nagamori M.A Metadata Framework for Cloud-based Digital Archives Using METS with PREMIS[M]//Xing C,Cresta F,Rauber A.Digital Libraries:For Cultural Heritage,Knowledge Dissemination,and Future Creation.Berlin:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,2011:118-127.
51 PREMIS Editorial Committee.PREMIS Usage Examples [EB/OL].[2018-06-26].https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/examples.html.
52 PREMIS Editorial Committee.Guidelines for Using PREMIS with METS for Exchange [EB/OL].[2018-06-26].http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis-mets.html.
53 张民.科研数据的迁移和保存元数据研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2013.
55 姜爱蓉.国家数字图书馆长期保存元数据规范与应用指南[M].国家图书馆出版社,2014:12-34.
56 刘越男,杨建梁.面向电子文件保存的统一元数据模型的构建[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(2):66-79.
57 Dappert A,Enders M.Using METS,PREMIS and MODS for Archiving eJournals[J].D-Lib Magazine,2008(14):21-30.
58 Romaniuk L.Metadata for a Web Archive:PREMIS and XMP as Tools for the Task[J/OL].Library Philosophy & Practice,2014(2):7 [2018-06-26].https://search.proquest.com/docview/1738006250/C1DFC5567B4945D1PQ/7 accountid=15157.
59 Duerr R,Weaver R,Parsons M A.A New Approach to Preservation Metadata for Scientific Data – A Real World Example[M]// Standard-Based Data and Information Systems for Earth Observation.Berlin:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,2010:305-308.
60 Recker A,Müller S.Preserving the Essence:Identifying the Significant Properties of Social Science Research Data[J].New Review of Information Networking,2015,20(1-2):229-235.
61 Moon J Y,Kim T S.A Study on Contents Model for Business Records by the Application of the PREMIS Data Model[J].Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management,2011,28(1):43-68.
62 Bunawan A A,Nordin S,Haron H.A Model for Preserving the Electronic Records Event History Metadata in Malaysia Government Agencies[C]// Seventh International Conference on Computational Intelligence,Modelling and Simulation.Kuantan,Malaysia,2016.
63 Donaldson D R,Conway P.Implementing PREMIS:A Case Study of the Florida Digital Archive[J].Library Hi Tech,2010,28(2):273-289.
64 Qarabolaq Z F,Inallou M S,Hafezi H A,et al.The Role of PREMIS Preservation Metadata in Information Management in Virtual Museums[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013(73):396-402.
65 Hitchcock S,Brody T,Hey J M N,et al.Preservation Metadata for Institutional Repositories:Applying PREMIS[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].http://preserv.eprints.org/papers/presmeta/presmeta-paper.html.
66 Askhoj J,Sugimoto S,Nagamori M.Developing an Ontology for Cloud-based Archive Systems[J].International Journal of Metadata Semantics & Ontologies,2015,10(1):133-146.
67 Gerrard D M,Mooney J E,Thompson D.Digital Preservation at Big Data Scales:Proposing a Step-change in Preservation System Architectures[J].Library Hi Tech,2018,36(3):524-538.
68 Jordan M,Mclellan E.PREMIS in Open-Source Software:Islandora and Archivematica[M]// Dappert A,Guenther R S,Peyrard S.Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners.New York:Springer International Publishing,2016:227-239.
71 刘家真,廖茹.电子文件管理元数据的质量控制与管理[J].图书情报知识,2009(6):91-96.
72 程颖.数字资源元数据质量管理的研究与探索[J].图书馆,2015(7):66-69,104.
73 蒋引娣.元数据质量评价研究[J].图书馆理论与实践,2009(5):39-41.
74 曹月珍,马建玲.国内外元数据质量控制的研究进展与发展趋势[J].图书与情报,2013(6):101-104.
75 Bruce T.R,Hillman D.I..TheContinuum of Metadata Quality:Defining,Expressing,Exploiting[M]// Hillmann D.,Weatbrooks E.L.Metadata in Practice.Chicago:American Library Association,2004:238-256.
76 Directory of Open AccessRepositories.OpenDOAR [EB/OL].[2017-09-29].http://opendoar.org/.
77,96 黄如花,邱春艳.数字信息资源长期保存元数据的管理策略[J].信息资源管理学报,2014(2):58-64.
78 Peyrard S,Angela D,Rebecca S.G.How to Develop a Digital Preservation Metadata Profile:Risk and Requirements Analysis[M]// Dappert A,Guenther R S,Peyrard S.Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners.New York:Springer International Publishing,2016:11-21.
79 林爱群.机构知识库元数据的自动生成与评估研究[J].图书馆学研究,2009(7):10,21-23.
80 黄莺,李建阳.元数据质量评估方法及模型研究[J].图书馆学研究,2013(12):51,52-56.
81 Moen W E,Stewart E L,McClure C R.Assessing Metadata Quality:Findings and Methodological Considerations from an Evaluation of the US Government Information Locator Service(GILS)[C]//Proceedings IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries,IEEE,1998.
82 Bruce T R,Hillman D I.The Continuum of Metadata Quality:Defining,Expressing,Exploiting[C]// Hillmann D,Weatbrooks E L.Metadata in Practice.Chicago:American Library Association,2004,238-256.
83 Ochoa X,Duval E.AutomaticEvaluation of Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories[J].International Journal on Digital Libraries,2009,10(2-3):67-91.
84 Chen Y N,Wen C Y,Chen H P,et al.Metrics for Metadata Quality Assurance and Their Implications for Digital Libraries[M]// Xing C,Cresta F,Rauber A.Digital Libraries:For Cultural Heritage,Knowledge Dissemination,and Future Creation.Berlin:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,2011:138-147.
85 Trippel T,Broeder D,Durco M,et al.Towards Automatic Quality Assessment of Component Metadata[C]// 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation,Reykjavík,Iceland,2014.
86 Stvilia B,Gasser L.Value-based Metadata Quality Assessment[J].Library & Information Science Research,2008,30(1):67-74.
87 Margaritopoulos T,Margaritopoulos M,Mavridis I,et al.A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment[C]//Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications,Berlin,Germany,2008.
88 Park J.Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories:A Survey of the Current State of the Art[J].Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,2009,47(3-4):213-228.
89 Bellini E,Nesi P.Metadata Quality Assessment Tool for Open Access Cultural Heritage Institutional Repositories[M]//Nesi P,Santucci R(Eds.).Information Technologies for Performing Arts,Media Access,and Entertainment.New York:Springer International Publishing,2013:90-103.
90 Reiche K J,H?fig E.Implementation of Metadata Quality Metrics and Application on Public Government Data[C]// 2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference,IEEE,2013.
91 Bui Y,Park J R.An Assessment of Metadata Quality:A Case Study of the National Science Digital Library Metadata Repository[C]// Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS/Actes du congrès annuel de l’ACSI,Toronto,Canada,2006.
92 Sboui T,Salehi M,Bédard Y,et al.Towards a Quantitative Evaluation of Geospatial Metadata Quality in the Context of Semantic Interoperability[C]// 6th International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality 2009,Newfoundland,Canada,2009.
93 Chassanoff A M.Metadata Quality Evaluation in Institutional Repositories:A Survey of Current Practices[D].Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,2009.
94 Van Hooland S.Metadata Quality in the Cultural Heritage Sector:Stakes,Problems and Solutions[D].Belgium:Université Libre de Bruxelles,2009.
95 Alemneh D G.Metadata Quality Assessment:A Phased Approach to Ensuring Long-term Access to Digital Resources[EB/OL].[2017-09-29].https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460380.
97 林爱群.机构知识库元数据的自动生成与评估研究[J].图书馆学研究,2009(7):21-23.
98 黄莺.元数据质量的定量评估方法综述[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(4):143-148.
99 曹月珍,马建玲.国内外元数据质量控制的研究进展与发展趋势[J].图书与情报,2013(6):101-104.
100,101 黄莺,李建阳.元数据质量评估研究现状剖析[J].中国电子商务,2013(4):164-165.