重大决策终身责任追究的困境
|
摘要
作为决策问责领域的一项新的制度安排,重大决策终身责任追究在我国尚不成熟,仍然面临着制度建构和实际运行的诸多困境。当前我国学界更多围绕制度建构困境展开研究,未能对实际运行中的困境有充分的认识和把握。基于重大决策责任认定的困难,从重大决策中决策者避责行为、复杂的责任网络以及责任标准的缺失和演化等方面探讨了重大决策终身责任追究面临的运行困境。要实现重大决策终身责任追究的有效运行,需要同步推进重大决策的深入变革和贯彻执行。更全面而深入挖掘重大决策终身责任追究的困境,同时思考如何化解这些困境的对策将是未来研究的方向。
As a new institutional arrangement in the field of major administrative decision-making,the lifelong responsibility system is still not mature in China,facing many difficulties in system construction and practical operation. At present,our academic circles have studied more about the dilemma of system construction,while not fully understood and grasped the difficulties in the actual operation. Based on the difficulties of the responsibility identification of major administrative decision making,the paper makes an analysis of the operational difficulties of the lifelong responsibility system from three aspects: responsibility evasion of the decision-maker,the complex responsibility network,and the lack and evolution of decision responsibility standards.To achieve the effective operation of the lifelong responsibility system of major administration decision-making,the reform and implementation of major administrative decision-making need to be promoted simultaneously. The study of the dilemma of lifelong responsibility system of major administrative decision-making is far from enough at present,more comprehensive and in-depth exploration of the dilemma as well as its solution countermeasures will be the direction of the study in the future.
As a new institutional arrangement in the field of major administrative decision-making,the lifelong responsibility system is still not mature in China,facing many difficulties in system construction and practical operation. At present,our academic circles have studied more about the dilemma of system construction,while not fully understood and grasped the difficulties in the actual operation. Based on the difficulties of the responsibility identification of major administrative decision making,the paper makes an analysis of the operational difficulties of the lifelong responsibility system from three aspects: responsibility evasion of the decision-maker,the complex responsibility network,and the lack and evolution of decision responsibility standards.To achieve the effective operation of the lifelong responsibility system of major administration decision-making,the reform and implementation of major administrative decision-making need to be promoted simultaneously. The study of the dilemma of lifelong responsibility system of major administrative decision-making is far from enough at present,more comprehensive and in-depth exploration of the dilemma as well as its solution countermeasures will be the direction of the study in the future.
引文
[1]陈国权,谷志军.非竞选政治中的决策问责:意义、困境与对策[J].经济社会体制比较,2014,(2).
[2]曾志敏、李乐.论公共理性决策模型的理论构建[J].公共管理学报,2014,(2).
[3]王仰文.重大行政决策责任终身追究制度的确立基础与困局突破[J].云南行政学院学报,2014,(5).
[4]周叶中.论重大行政决策问责机制的构建[J].广东社会科学,2015,(2).
[5]黄学贤、桂萍.重大行政决策之范围界定[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(5).
[6]熊樟林.重大行政决策概念证伪及其补正[J].中国法学,2015,(3).
[7]张倩.重大行政决策终身责任追究制的法律困境及其突破[J].学习与探索,2016,(11).
[8]薛瑞汉.建立重大决策终身责任追究制度及责任倒查机制[J].领导科学,2015,(2).
[9]王仰文.中国行政决策责任追究的制度困局分析[J].天津行政学院学报,2014,(6).
[10]陈建科.重大决策终身责任追究制度研究[J].中共贵州省委党校学报,2014,(6).
[11]喻少如.论决策终身负责制的合理构造——基于行政法学视角的观察和思考[J].学术前沿,2014,(12).
[12]夏金莱.重大行政决策终身责任追究制度研究——基于行政法学的视角[J].法学评论,2015,(4).
[13]谭达宗.重大行政决策终身责任制的法律责任定位[J].中国行政管理,2016,(8).
[14]谷志军.重大行政决策终身责任追究的适用范围[J].理论视野,2016,(4).
[15]韩春晖.行政决策终身责任追究制的法律难题及其解决[J].中国法学,2015,(6).
[16]李娜.构建重大行政决策终身责任追究制的法律对策[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(7).
[17]刘召.重大公共决策责任研究中的“多只手难题”[N].学习时报,2014-11-24.
[18]陶鹏.迟滞、分化及泛化:避责政治与风险规制体制形塑[J].云南社会科学,2016,(6).
[19]朱德米.决策与风险源:社会稳定源头治理之关键[J].公共管理学报,2015,(1).
[20]王柳.绩效问责的制度逻辑及实现路径[J].中国行政管理,2016,(7).
[21]刘峰.建立重大决策终身责任追究制度及责任倒查机制[J].理论视野,2015,(1).
[22]珍妮特·登哈特,罗伯特·登哈特.新公共服务:服务,而不是掌舵[M].丁煌,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
(1)“完全理性全知”(The Rational Comprehensive)认为决策者能够全面而准确识别决策问题,对于决策价值和目标是清晰的,对解决问题的各种方案的利弊是清楚的,能够准确认清不同决策方案的成本和收益、优点和缺点以及所产生的结果。基于此,决策者能够选择最优的决策方案。
[2]曾志敏、李乐.论公共理性决策模型的理论构建[J].公共管理学报,2014,(2).
[3]王仰文.重大行政决策责任终身追究制度的确立基础与困局突破[J].云南行政学院学报,2014,(5).
[4]周叶中.论重大行政决策问责机制的构建[J].广东社会科学,2015,(2).
[5]黄学贤、桂萍.重大行政决策之范围界定[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(5).
[6]熊樟林.重大行政决策概念证伪及其补正[J].中国法学,2015,(3).
[7]张倩.重大行政决策终身责任追究制的法律困境及其突破[J].学习与探索,2016,(11).
[8]薛瑞汉.建立重大决策终身责任追究制度及责任倒查机制[J].领导科学,2015,(2).
[9]王仰文.中国行政决策责任追究的制度困局分析[J].天津行政学院学报,2014,(6).
[10]陈建科.重大决策终身责任追究制度研究[J].中共贵州省委党校学报,2014,(6).
[11]喻少如.论决策终身负责制的合理构造——基于行政法学视角的观察和思考[J].学术前沿,2014,(12).
[12]夏金莱.重大行政决策终身责任追究制度研究——基于行政法学的视角[J].法学评论,2015,(4).
[13]谭达宗.重大行政决策终身责任制的法律责任定位[J].中国行政管理,2016,(8).
[14]谷志军.重大行政决策终身责任追究的适用范围[J].理论视野,2016,(4).
[15]韩春晖.行政决策终身责任追究制的法律难题及其解决[J].中国法学,2015,(6).
[16]李娜.构建重大行政决策终身责任追究制的法律对策[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(7).
[17]刘召.重大公共决策责任研究中的“多只手难题”[N].学习时报,2014-11-24.
[18]陶鹏.迟滞、分化及泛化:避责政治与风险规制体制形塑[J].云南社会科学,2016,(6).
[19]朱德米.决策与风险源:社会稳定源头治理之关键[J].公共管理学报,2015,(1).
[20]王柳.绩效问责的制度逻辑及实现路径[J].中国行政管理,2016,(7).
[21]刘峰.建立重大决策终身责任追究制度及责任倒查机制[J].理论视野,2015,(1).
[22]珍妮特·登哈特,罗伯特·登哈特.新公共服务:服务,而不是掌舵[M].丁煌,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
(1)“完全理性全知”(The Rational Comprehensive)认为决策者能够全面而准确识别决策问题,对于决策价值和目标是清晰的,对解决问题的各种方案的利弊是清楚的,能够准确认清不同决策方案的成本和收益、优点和缺点以及所产生的结果。基于此,决策者能够选择最优的决策方案。