26个辣椒品种主要农艺性状分析与测评
|
摘要
为了筛选出适于常德春露地栽培的辣椒品种,对26个辣椒品种的13个性状作了相关性分析和聚类分析,并进行群众测评。结果表明:单果重与商品果横径、果肩形状呈极显著正相关,与叶形、果形、熟性呈极显著负相关;单产与单果重呈极显著正相关,与商品果横径、果肩形状呈显著正相关,与果形、熟性、叶形呈极显著负相关;熟性与叶形呈极显著正相关,与果形呈显著正相关,与商品果横径、单果重、果肩形状呈极显著负相关;将26个品种聚类分成4大类,果形和产量是影响聚类结果的重要因素。农民测评投票的选择意向与株高、株幅、果肩形状、病毒病抗性呈极显著相关关系,相关系数分别为0.538、0.542、-0.570、-0.518,与果实横径、叶形、果形呈显著相关;评选出‘湘研青翠’、‘丰抗21’、‘更新8号’、‘兴蔬201’等品种适于当地栽培。
To screen out pepper varieties suitable for spring open cultivation in Changde, we analyzed 13 characters by correlation analysis, cluster analysis and mass evaluation for 26 pepper varieties. The single fruit weight was significantly correlated with the transverse diameter of commodity fruit and the shape of fruit-shoulder. The single fruit weight was significantly negatively correlated with the leaf shape, fruit shape and maturity. The yield per plant was significantly correlated with the single fruit weight, and significantly positively correlated with the transverse diameter of commodity fruit and the shape of fruit-shoulder, but was significantly negatively correlated with the leaf shape, fruit shape and maturity. The maturity was significantly correlated with the leaf shape, and significantly positively correlated with the fruit shape, but was significantly negatively correlated with the transverse diameter of commodity fruit, the single fruit weight and the shape of fruit-shoulder. The 26 varieties were divided into four categories based on cluster analysis. The fruit shape and yield were the most important factors affecting the clustering results. The willingness of farmers to choose a variety was correlated with plant height, plant width, shape of fruit-shoulder, and virus resistant.And the correlation coefficient was 0.538, 0.542, -0.570, -0.518, respectively. It was correlated with transverse diameter of fruit, leaf shape and fruit shape. ‘Xiangyan-qingcui’, ‘Fengkang 21’, ‘Gengxin 8’, ‘Xingshu 201’ were suitable for cultivation in Changde.
To screen out pepper varieties suitable for spring open cultivation in Changde, we analyzed 13 characters by correlation analysis, cluster analysis and mass evaluation for 26 pepper varieties. The single fruit weight was significantly correlated with the transverse diameter of commodity fruit and the shape of fruit-shoulder. The single fruit weight was significantly negatively correlated with the leaf shape, fruit shape and maturity. The yield per plant was significantly correlated with the single fruit weight, and significantly positively correlated with the transverse diameter of commodity fruit and the shape of fruit-shoulder, but was significantly negatively correlated with the leaf shape, fruit shape and maturity. The maturity was significantly correlated with the leaf shape, and significantly positively correlated with the fruit shape, but was significantly negatively correlated with the transverse diameter of commodity fruit, the single fruit weight and the shape of fruit-shoulder. The 26 varieties were divided into four categories based on cluster analysis. The fruit shape and yield were the most important factors affecting the clustering results. The willingness of farmers to choose a variety was correlated with plant height, plant width, shape of fruit-shoulder, and virus resistant.And the correlation coefficient was 0.538, 0.542, -0.570, -0.518, respectively. It was correlated with transverse diameter of fruit, leaf shape and fruit shape. ‘Xiangyan-qingcui’, ‘Fengkang 21’, ‘Gengxin 8’, ‘Xingshu 201’ were suitable for cultivation in Changde.
引文
[1]聂楚楚,王秀峰,毛芙蓉,等.辣椒品种的聚类及主成分分析[J].北方园艺,2017(17):86-91.
[2]王永平,何嘉,张绍刚,等.我国辣椒国内外市场需求现状及变化趋势[J].北方园艺,2010(1):213-216.
[3]黄任中,黄启中,吕中华,等.我国干制辣椒产业现状及发展对策[J].中国蔬菜,2015,1(2):9-11.
[4]陈文超.湖南辣椒发展状况[J].辣椒杂志,2017(2):8-9.
[5]耿三省,陈斌,张晓芬,等.我国辣椒育种动态及市场品种分布概况[J].辣椒杂志,2011(3):1-4,9.
[6]韩泽群,姜波.加工番茄品种多性状综合评价方法研[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(2):357-365.
[7]王安乐,邓稳桥,吉甫成.湖南主要辣椒品种产量与主要农艺性状的相关性及通径分析[J].湖南农业科学,2015(5):1-3.
[8]乔迺妮,陈益元.辣椒主要农艺性状的相关性及通径分析[J].长江蔬菜,2013(22):16-19.
[9]李锡香,张宝玺.辣椒种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
[10]赫卫,张慧,董延龙,等.辣椒种质资源形态学性状相关性、主成分与聚类分析[J].北方园艺,2018(4):9-17.
[11]夏碧波,李颖,王恒明,等.国外引进辣椒资源形态学性状的聚类分析[J].分子植物育种,2017,15(8):3318-3330.
[12]邹学校,侯喜林,戴雄泽,等.辣椒地方品种的主成分分析及数量分类[J].湖南农业大学学报,2004,30(3):243-246.
[13]杨志刚,胡全红,王勇,等.辣椒种质色价及主要果实性状指标的聚类分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2015,43(5):149-155.
[14]詹永发,杨红,涂祥敏,等.辣椒品种资源的遗传多样性和聚类分析[J].贵州农业科学,2010,38(11):12-15.
[15]程海刚,郭艳萍,李翎,等.线辣椒主要生物学性状相关性分析及产量因素通径分析[J].陕西农业科学,2012(2):71-73.
[16]乔丹,李红勋,柯水发,等.农户对林业公共服务的满意度影响因素分析--基于北京市怀柔区293户农户的调查[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):48-55.
[17]刘梦龙,赵伟,蒋丽媛,等.关中东部早春茬番茄优良品种筛选[J].西北农业学报,2018,27(3):402-410.
[18]陈玉玲,王其海,夏乐晗,等.河南地区9个柿品种果实品质评价[J].经济林研究,2017,35(3):199-202.
[2]王永平,何嘉,张绍刚,等.我国辣椒国内外市场需求现状及变化趋势[J].北方园艺,2010(1):213-216.
[3]黄任中,黄启中,吕中华,等.我国干制辣椒产业现状及发展对策[J].中国蔬菜,2015,1(2):9-11.
[4]陈文超.湖南辣椒发展状况[J].辣椒杂志,2017(2):8-9.
[5]耿三省,陈斌,张晓芬,等.我国辣椒育种动态及市场品种分布概况[J].辣椒杂志,2011(3):1-4,9.
[6]韩泽群,姜波.加工番茄品种多性状综合评价方法研[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(2):357-365.
[7]王安乐,邓稳桥,吉甫成.湖南主要辣椒品种产量与主要农艺性状的相关性及通径分析[J].湖南农业科学,2015(5):1-3.
[8]乔迺妮,陈益元.辣椒主要农艺性状的相关性及通径分析[J].长江蔬菜,2013(22):16-19.
[9]李锡香,张宝玺.辣椒种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
[10]赫卫,张慧,董延龙,等.辣椒种质资源形态学性状相关性、主成分与聚类分析[J].北方园艺,2018(4):9-17.
[11]夏碧波,李颖,王恒明,等.国外引进辣椒资源形态学性状的聚类分析[J].分子植物育种,2017,15(8):3318-3330.
[12]邹学校,侯喜林,戴雄泽,等.辣椒地方品种的主成分分析及数量分类[J].湖南农业大学学报,2004,30(3):243-246.
[13]杨志刚,胡全红,王勇,等.辣椒种质色价及主要果实性状指标的聚类分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2015,43(5):149-155.
[14]詹永发,杨红,涂祥敏,等.辣椒品种资源的遗传多样性和聚类分析[J].贵州农业科学,2010,38(11):12-15.
[15]程海刚,郭艳萍,李翎,等.线辣椒主要生物学性状相关性分析及产量因素通径分析[J].陕西农业科学,2012(2):71-73.
[16]乔丹,李红勋,柯水发,等.农户对林业公共服务的满意度影响因素分析--基于北京市怀柔区293户农户的调查[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):48-55.
[17]刘梦龙,赵伟,蒋丽媛,等.关中东部早春茬番茄优良品种筛选[J].西北农业学报,2018,27(3):402-410.
[18]陈玉玲,王其海,夏乐晗,等.河南地区9个柿品种果实品质评价[J].经济林研究,2017,35(3):199-202.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |