用户名: 密码: 验证码:
二维超声TI-RADS分类联合超声造影在诊断甲状腺癌中的应用
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Two-dimensional Ultrasound TI-RADS Classification Combined with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis
  • 作者:吴晓安 ; 刘丽萍
  • 英文作者:WU Xiaoan;LIU Liping;Department of Ultrasound, the First Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University;
  • 关键词:甲状腺肿瘤 ; 超声检查 ; 造影剂 ; 甲状腺影像学报告及数据系统
  • 英文关键词:Thyroid neoplasms;;Ultrasonography;;Contrast media;;Thyroid imaging reporting and data system
  • 中文刊名:ZYYZ
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
  • 机构:重庆医科大学附属第一医院超声科;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-25
  • 出版单位:中国医学影像学杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.27;No.189
  • 基金:重庆市卫生局面上项目(2011-2-100)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZYYZ201902013
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-3154/R
  • 分类号:57-60
摘要
目的探讨二维超声甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)分级联合超声造影(CEUS)对甲状腺癌的诊断价值。资料与方法回顾性分析300例甲状腺结节患者(共419个结节)的二维超声及CEUS资料,观察甲状腺癌二维超声、CEUS征象,并以手术病理结果为"金标准",比较二维超声TI-RADS分类、CEUS单一及其联合检查甲状腺癌的诊断效能。结果 419个甲状腺结节经手术病理证实恶性结节135个,其中乳头状癌126个。二维超声显示甲状腺恶性结节142个,表现出低回声119个,均形态不规则、内部回声不均;CEUS检出甲状腺恶性结节153个,其中不均匀低强化120个。TI-RADS分级联合CEUS诊断甲状腺癌的敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为93.33%、92.96%、93.08%、86.30%、96.70%,均显著高于TI-RADS分级的74.07%、85.21%、81.62%、70.42%、87.36%以及CEUS检查的85.19%、86.62%、86.16%、75.16%、92.48%,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论与二维超声TI-RADS分类、CEUS单一检查相比,两者联合检查诊断甲状腺癌具有明显优势。
        Purpose To explore the diagnostic value of two-dimensional thyroid imaging reporting and data system(TI-RADS classification combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) in thyroid cancer. Materials and Methods The two-dimensional ultrasound and CEUS imaging data of 300 patients with thyroid nodules(in total 419 nodules) were retrospectively analyzed. Twodimensional ultrasound and CEUS signs of thyroid cancer were observed and with surgical pathological results as golden standards, twodimensional ultrasound TI-RADS classification, CEUS single and diagnostic efficacy of thyroid cancer with combined examination were compared. Results Among the 419 thyroid nodules, 135 nodules were confirmed by surgery and pathology malignant, including 126 papillary carcinomas. Two-dimensional ultrasound showed 142 malignant thyroid nodules and 119 nodules showed hypoechoic echoes.All nodules were irregular in morphology and inhomogeneous in internal echo. 153 malignant thyroid nodules were detected through CEUS, including 120 nodules with inhomogeneous low enhancement. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of TI-RADS classification combined CEUS in thyroid cancer diagnosis were 93.33%, 92.96%, 93.08%, 86.30%and 96.70%, respectively; which were significantly higher than the 74.07%, 85.21%, 81.62%, 70.42%, 87.36% of TI-RADS classification and 85.19%, 86.62%, 86.16%, 75.16% and 92.48% examined by CEUS. The difference was of statistical significance(all P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with two-dimensional ultrasound TI-RADS classification and CEUS single examination, combination of the two has obvious advantages in thyroid cancer diagnosis.
引文
[1]李小鹏,张红丽,何鑫,等.甲状腺良恶性结节超声造影特征与病理微血管密度的相关性研究.中国临床医学影像杂志,2015,26(9):631-634.
    [2]Park JY,Lee HJ,Jang HW,et al.A proposal for a thyroid imaging reporting and data system for ultrasound features of thyroid carcinoma.Thyroid,2009,19(11):1257-1264.
    [3]Kwak JY,Han KH,Yoon JH,et al.Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules:a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk.Radiology,2011,260(3):892-899.
    [4]钟丽佳,黄艳红,沈志云,等.超声造影诊断甲状腺癌的临床价值.中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2017,24(2):63-66.
    [5]Zhang B,Jiang YX,Liu JB,et al.Utility of contrastenhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules.Thyroid,2010,20(1):51-57.
    [6]王怡,张群霞,冉海涛.美国放射学院与Kwak甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的比较.中国医学影像学杂志,2017,25(12):881-884.
    [7]聂芳,汪延芳,耿祥亮,等.不同标准TI-RADS分级对甲状腺癌的价值探讨.中国超声医学杂志,2016,32(11):967-970.
    [8]Horvath E,Majlis S,Rossi R,et al.An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management.J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2009,94(5):1748-1751.
    [9]余小琴,郭莉,何惠丽,等.TI-RADS分类系统联合超声造影对甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别诊断价值.医学影像学杂志,2017,27(6):1056-1059,1072.
    [10]邓瑶瑶,何云,杨红,等.甲状腺影像学报告及数据系统分级联合超声造影对甲状腺良、恶性结节的鉴别诊断价值.广西医学,2015,37(8):1079-1081,1084.
    [11]郝莹,田家玮,刘微,等.改良甲状腺影像学报告及数据系统(TI-RADS)分级诊断甲状腺癌的可行性研究.中华超声影像学杂志,2015,24(10):878-881.
    [12]林婉玲,吕国荣,李伯义,等.甲状腺TI-RADS超声指标与肿瘤生物学行为的关系.中国超声医学杂志,2016,32(10):871-873.
    [13]邬亮,姚树新,何东方.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统联合超声弹性成像对甲状腺良恶性结节的诊断价值.中国临床医学影像杂志,2018,29(5):309-312.
    [14]乔妙,孙艳,侯新华,等.超声造影对桥本甲状腺炎背景下甲状腺良恶性结节的诊断效能.中国医学影像学杂志,2018,26(2):104-108.
    [15]Schaefer IM,Sauer U,Liwocha M,et al.Occult gastric signet ring cell carcinoma presenting as spermatic cord and testicular metastases:"Krukenberg tumor"in a male patient.Pathol Res Pract,2010,206(7):519-521.
    [16]陈超男,梁萍,程志刚,等.超声造影在甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别中的临床应用.解放军医学院学报,2015,36(7):651-653,678.
    [17]黄丽丽,孔德华,周琦,等.甲状腺良恶性结节实时超声造影误诊分析.中华内分泌外科杂志,2017,11(4):307-310.
    [18]Zhang Y,Jiang Q,Zhang Y,et al.Association between realtime contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics and thyroid carcinoma size.Mol Clin Oncol,2015,3(4):743-746.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700