武夷山落叶林木本植物细根性状研究
|
摘要
细根作为植物吸收水分与养分的重要器官,其性状特征在指示植物的生长和分布等方面的意义重大。以江西武夷山国家级自然保护区落叶林群落木本植物的细根为对象,对根氮含量(RNC)、根磷含量(RPC)、根氮磷比(RN∶P)、根组织密度(RTD)、比根长(SRL)和比根面积(SRA)等6个细根性状进行了研究,并对群落内不同物种以及不同结构单元(灌木和乔木)间细根性状的差异性进行分析。结果表明:武夷山落叶林群落木本植物的平均RNC为(10.27±3.11) mg/g、平均RPC为(0.63±0.17) mg/g、平均RN∶P为16. 36±2. 61、平均RTD为(0. 10±0. 02) g/cm~3、平均SRL为(1582.65±186.67) cm/g、平均SRA为(464.81±64.10) cm~2/g;灌木的SRL显著高于乔木(P=0.033),其余细根性状在灌木和乔木之间无显著差异(P> 0.05);在细根性状中,RNC与RPC呈极显著正相关,但与RTD呈显著负相关,RPC、SRA分别与RTD呈极显著负相关,RPC、SRL分别与SRA呈极显著正相关。这可能反映了灌木倾向于通过增加SRL来提高水分和养分的获取能力以增强与乔木的竞争优势;群落中的植物通过改变SRA及RTD进行生长与防御之间的权衡。
As important organs for plants to absorb water and nutrients,fine roots are of great significance in indicating the growth and distribution of plants. In order to better understand the variation of fine root traits across species and structural units( shrubs and trees),here we collected fine roots of woody plants in deciduous forest of the Wuyishan National Nature Reserve,Jiangxi Province,and studied their traits including root nitrogen content( RNC),root phosphorus content( RPC),root nitrogen and phosphorus ratio( RN ∶ P),root tissue density( RTD),specific root length( SRL),and specific root surface area( SRA). We found that the mean values of chemical traits: RNC,RPC and RN ∶P of woody plants in the studied deciduous forest were( 10.27±3.11) mg/g,( 0.63±0.17) mg/g and 16.36 ± 2.61,respectively. The mean values of morphological traits,RTD,SRL and SRA were( 0.10±0.02) g/cm~3,( 1582.65±186.67) cm/g and( 464.81±64.10) cm~2/g,respectively. The SRL of shrubs was significantly higher than that of trees( P = 0.033),but there were no significant differences in other fine root traits between shrubs and trees( P > 0.05). The RNC was positively correlated with RPC but negatively with RTD; the RTD was negatively correlated with both RPC and SRA; the SRA was positively correlated with both RPC and SRL. These results suggest that shrubs tend to increase the accessibility of water and nutrients by increasing its SRL to enhance its competitive advantage over trees,and that woody plants in deciduous forest make a trade-off between growth and defense by changing their SRA and RTD.
As important organs for plants to absorb water and nutrients,fine roots are of great significance in indicating the growth and distribution of plants. In order to better understand the variation of fine root traits across species and structural units( shrubs and trees),here we collected fine roots of woody plants in deciduous forest of the Wuyishan National Nature Reserve,Jiangxi Province,and studied their traits including root nitrogen content( RNC),root phosphorus content( RPC),root nitrogen and phosphorus ratio( RN ∶ P),root tissue density( RTD),specific root length( SRL),and specific root surface area( SRA). We found that the mean values of chemical traits: RNC,RPC and RN ∶P of woody plants in the studied deciduous forest were( 10.27±3.11) mg/g,( 0.63±0.17) mg/g and 16.36 ± 2.61,respectively. The mean values of morphological traits,RTD,SRL and SRA were( 0.10±0.02) g/cm~3,( 1582.65±186.67) cm/g and( 464.81±64.10) cm~2/g,respectively. The SRL of shrubs was significantly higher than that of trees( P = 0.033),but there were no significant differences in other fine root traits between shrubs and trees( P > 0.05). The RNC was positively correlated with RPC but negatively with RTD; the RTD was negatively correlated with both RPC and SRA; the SRA was positively correlated with both RPC and SRL. These results suggest that shrubs tend to increase the accessibility of water and nutrients by increasing its SRL to enhance its competitive advantage over trees,and that woody plants in deciduous forest make a trade-off between growth and defense by changing their SRA and RTD.
引文
[1]张小全,吴可红,Murach D.树木细根生产与周转研究方法评述.生态学报,2000,20(5):875-883.
[2]Gill R A,Jackson R B.Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems.New Phytologist,2000,147(1):13-31.
[3]Yuan Z Y,Chen H Y H.Fine root biomass,production,turnover rates,and nutrient contents in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species,climate,fertility,and stand age:literature review and meta-analyses.Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences,2010,29(4):204-221.
[4]Eissenstat D M,Yanai R D.The ecology of root lifespan.Advances in Ecological Research,1997,27(C):1-60.
[5]戚德辉,温仲明,杨士梭,王红霞,郭茹.基于功能性状的铁杆蒿对环境变化的响应与适应.应用生态学报,2015,26(7):1921-1927.
[6]权伟,余少娜,王国兵,阮宏华,方燕鸿,汪家社.武夷山不同海拔植被土壤细根比根长季节动态.南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(6):139-142.
[7]Blondel J.Guilds or functional groups:does it matter?Oikos,2003,100(2):223-231.
[8]Cummins K W.Structure and function of stream ecosystems.Bioscience,1974,24(11):631-641.
[9]Elser J J.Phylogenetic and growth form variation in the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus in the seed plants.American Naturalist,2006,168(4):E103-E122.
[10]龚时慧.环境与系统发育背景对延河流域植物群落功能性状的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[11]王晓洁.东北阔叶红松林植物功能性状与功能多样性的地理差异研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2015.
[12]张继勇.帽儿地区不同植物功能群叶片性状的比较研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.
[13]张月强.探究泰山木本植物功能性状间的关系及对环境因子的响应[D].济南:山东大学,2014.
[14]Sterner R W,Elser J J.Ecological Stoichiometry:The Biology of Elements From Molecules to The Biosphere.Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,2002.
[15]施宇,温仲明,龚时慧.黄土丘陵区植物叶片与细根功能性状关系及其变化.生态学报,2011,31(22):6805-6814.
[16]宋光.陕北黄土高原刺槐功能性状对环境因子的适应性研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2013.
[17]龚时慧,温仲明,施宇.延河流域植物群落功能性状对环境梯度的响应.生态学报,2011,31(20):6088-6097.
[18]Craine J M,Lee W G,Bond W J,Williams R J,Johnson L C.Environmental constraints on a global relationship among leaf and root traits of grasses.Ecology,2005,86(1):12-19.
[19]Reich P B,Walters M B,Tjoelker M G,Vanderklein D,Buschena C.Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate.Functional Ecology,1998,12(3):395-405.
[20]Valverde-Barrantes O J,Smemo K A,Blackwood C B.Fine root morphology is phylogenetically structured,but nitrogen is related to the plant economics spectrum in temperate trees.Functional Ecology,2015,29(6):796-807.
[21]周鹏,耿燕,马文红,贺金生.温带草地主要优势植物不同器官间功能性状的关联.植物生态学报,2010,34(1):7-16.
[22]Tjoelker M G,Craine J M,Wedin D,Reich P B,Tilman D.Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species.New Phytologist,2005,167(2):493-508.
[23]徐欢欢.武夷山自然保护区植被垂直分布与特征.武夷科学,2007,23(1):177-180.
[24]何建源,林建丽,刘初钿,陈鹭真,李振基.武夷山自然保护区蕨类植物物种多样性与区系的研究.福建林业科技,2004,31(4):40-43,57-57.
[25]权伟.武夷山不同海拔植被细根的空间变化与季节动态[D].南京:南京林业大学,2008.
[26]权伟,徐侠,王丰,汪家社,方燕鸿,阮宏华,余水强.武夷山不同海拔高度植被细根生物量及形态特征.生态学杂志,2008,27(7):1095-1103.
[27]卢宏典,靳冰洁,钟全林,马玉珠,郭炳桥,郑媛,李曼,程栋梁.中国南方5个地区木本植物根及叶片N、P生态化学计量学特征.安徽农业大学学报,2016,43(3):481-488.
[28]郑成洋,刘增力,方精云.福建黄岗山东南坡和西北坡乔木物种多样性及群落特征的垂直变化.生物多样性,2004,12(1):63-74.
[29]刘信中,方福生.江西武夷山自然保护区科学考察集.北京:中国林业出版社,2001.
[30]Warton D I,Wright I J,Falster D S,Westoby M.Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry.Biological Reviews,2006,81(2):259-291.
[31]Venables W N,Smith D M,the R Core Team.An Introduction to R.Notes on R:A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics.Version 3.5.0 Under development(2017-12-06)[2017-12-20].http://ydl.oregonstate.edu/pub/cran/doc/manuals/r-patched/R-intro.pdf.
[32]那守海.氮磷营养对落叶松幼苗生长的调控[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.
[33]马玉珠,钟全林,靳冰洁,卢宏典,郭炳桥,郑媛,李曼,程栋梁.中国植物细根碳、氮、磷化学计量学的空间变化及其影响因子.植物生态学报,2015,39(2):159-166.
[34]Kerkhoff A J,Enquist B J,Elser J J,Fagan W F.Plant allometry,stoichiometry and the temperature-dependence of primary productivity.Global Ecology and Biogeography,2005,14(6):585-598.
[35]Liu X J,Zhang Y,Han W X,Tang A,Shen J L,Cui Z L,Vitousek P,Erisman J W,Goulding K,Christie P,Fangmeier A,Zhang F S.Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China.Nature,2013,494(7438):459-463.
[36]刘尔平,刘桂生,雷俊杰.闽北果园生态系统大气氮湿沉降研究.江西农业学报,2012,24(7):115-117.
[37]崔晓阳.植物对有机氮源的利用及其在自然生态系统中的意义.生态学报,2007,27(8):3500-3512.
[38]邱燕,张鼎华.南方酸性土壤磷素化学研究进展.福建稻麦科技,2003,21(3):14-17.
[39]刘广路,范少辉,郭宝华,杜满义,李兴军.不同年龄毛竹碳氮磷化学计量特征.热带作物学报,2016,37(2):279-285.
[40]Koerselman W,Meuleman A F M.The vegetation N∶P ratio:a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation.Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(6):1441-1450.
[41]Yuan Z Y,Chen H Y H,Reich P B.Global-scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus.Nature Communications,2011,2(1):344.
[42]Reich P B,Oleksyn J.Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2004,101(30):11001-11006.
[43]Wardle D A,Walker L R,Bardgett R D.Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences.Science,2004,305(5683):509-513.
[44]郑颖,温仲明,宋光,丁曼.环境及遗传背景对延河流域植物叶片和细根功能性状变异的影响.生态学报,2014,34(10):2682-2692.
[45]邹斌,蔡飞,郑景明,戴伟.亚热带天然林4种树木细根生物量垂直分布和主要功能性状的差异.东北林业大学学报,2015,43(3):18-22.
[46]Kong D L,Ma C G,Zhang Q,Li L,Chen X Y,Zeng H,Guo D L.Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species.New Phytologist,2014,203(3):863-872.
[47]Mc Cormack M L,Adams T S,Smithwick E A,Eissenstat D M.Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees.New Phytologist,2012,195(4):823-831.
[48]施宇.延河流域植物功能性状对环境变化的响应和植物适应策略研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[49]Kramer-Walter K R,Bellingham P J,Millar T R,Smissen R D,Richardson S J,Laughlin D C.Root traits are multidimensional:specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum.Journal of Ecology,2016,104(5):1299-1310.
[50]赵国靖.黄土丘陵区两乡土草混播下根系形态特征及其对土壤水分变化的响应[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014.
[51]高德武,王晓辉,蔡体久.公别拉流域露天煤矿排土场植被恢复制约因素及对策.黑龙江水利科技,2003,30(4):95-96.
[52]韦兰英,上官周平.黄土高原白羊草、沙棘和辽东栎细根比根长特性.生态学报,2006,26(12):4164-4170.
[53]寇萌,焦菊英,王巧利,尹秋龙.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被带植物群落的细根分布特征.农业机械学报,2016,47(2):161-171.
[54]徐琨,李芳兰,苟水燕,包维楷.岷江干旱河谷25种植物一年生植株根系功能性状及相互关系.生态学报,2012,32(1):215-225.
[55]Freschet G T,Valverde-Barrantes O J,Tucker C M,Craine J M,Mc Cormack M L,Violle C,Fort F,Blackwood C B,Urban-Mead K R,Iversen C M,Bonis A,Comas L H,Cornelissen J H C,Dong M,Guo D L,Hobbie S E,Holdaway R J,Kembel S W,Makita N,Onipchenko V G,Picon-Cochard C,Reich P B,de la Riva E G,Smith S W,Soudzilovskaia N A,Tjoelker M G,Wardle D A,Roumet C.Climate,soil and plant functional types as drivers of global fine-root trait variation.Journal of Ecology,2017,105(5):1182-1196.
[56]郑淑霞,上官周平.黄土高原地区植物叶片养分组成的空间分布格局.自然科学进展,2006,16(8):965-973.
[57]Macarthur R,Levins R.The limiting similarity,convergence,and divergence of coexisting species.American Naturalist,1967,101(921):377-385.
[58]Lavorel S,Garnier E.Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits:revisiting the Holy Grail.Functional Ecology,2002,16(5):545-556.
[59]Wright I J,Falster D S,Melinda P,Westoby M.Cross-species patterns in the coordination between leaf and stem traits,and their implications for plant hydraulics.Physiologia Plantarum,2006,127(3):445-456.
[60]Westoby M,Falster D S,Moles A T,Vesk P A,Wright I J.Plant ecological strategies:some leading dimensions of variation between species.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,2002,33(1):125-159.
[61]赵文霞,邹斌,郑景明,罗久富.常绿阔叶林常见树种根茎叶功能性状的相关性.北京林业大学学报,2016,38(6):35-41.
[62]胡耀升.长白山森林不同演替阶段植物功能性状及其影响因子的研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2014.
[63]许旸.中国热带27个阔叶树种不同根序细根的形态特征、解剖结构和碳氮研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2011.
[64]郑颖.延河流域植物叶片与细根功能性状的时空变化[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014.
[65]Valverde-Barrantes O J,Blackwood C B.Root traits are multidimensional:specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum:Commentary on Kramer-Walter et al.(2016).Journal of Ecology,2016,104(5):1311-1313.
[2]Gill R A,Jackson R B.Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems.New Phytologist,2000,147(1):13-31.
[3]Yuan Z Y,Chen H Y H.Fine root biomass,production,turnover rates,and nutrient contents in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species,climate,fertility,and stand age:literature review and meta-analyses.Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences,2010,29(4):204-221.
[4]Eissenstat D M,Yanai R D.The ecology of root lifespan.Advances in Ecological Research,1997,27(C):1-60.
[5]戚德辉,温仲明,杨士梭,王红霞,郭茹.基于功能性状的铁杆蒿对环境变化的响应与适应.应用生态学报,2015,26(7):1921-1927.
[6]权伟,余少娜,王国兵,阮宏华,方燕鸿,汪家社.武夷山不同海拔植被土壤细根比根长季节动态.南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(6):139-142.
[7]Blondel J.Guilds or functional groups:does it matter?Oikos,2003,100(2):223-231.
[8]Cummins K W.Structure and function of stream ecosystems.Bioscience,1974,24(11):631-641.
[9]Elser J J.Phylogenetic and growth form variation in the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus in the seed plants.American Naturalist,2006,168(4):E103-E122.
[10]龚时慧.环境与系统发育背景对延河流域植物群落功能性状的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[11]王晓洁.东北阔叶红松林植物功能性状与功能多样性的地理差异研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2015.
[12]张继勇.帽儿地区不同植物功能群叶片性状的比较研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.
[13]张月强.探究泰山木本植物功能性状间的关系及对环境因子的响应[D].济南:山东大学,2014.
[14]Sterner R W,Elser J J.Ecological Stoichiometry:The Biology of Elements From Molecules to The Biosphere.Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,2002.
[15]施宇,温仲明,龚时慧.黄土丘陵区植物叶片与细根功能性状关系及其变化.生态学报,2011,31(22):6805-6814.
[16]宋光.陕北黄土高原刺槐功能性状对环境因子的适应性研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2013.
[17]龚时慧,温仲明,施宇.延河流域植物群落功能性状对环境梯度的响应.生态学报,2011,31(20):6088-6097.
[18]Craine J M,Lee W G,Bond W J,Williams R J,Johnson L C.Environmental constraints on a global relationship among leaf and root traits of grasses.Ecology,2005,86(1):12-19.
[19]Reich P B,Walters M B,Tjoelker M G,Vanderklein D,Buschena C.Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate.Functional Ecology,1998,12(3):395-405.
[20]Valverde-Barrantes O J,Smemo K A,Blackwood C B.Fine root morphology is phylogenetically structured,but nitrogen is related to the plant economics spectrum in temperate trees.Functional Ecology,2015,29(6):796-807.
[21]周鹏,耿燕,马文红,贺金生.温带草地主要优势植物不同器官间功能性状的关联.植物生态学报,2010,34(1):7-16.
[22]Tjoelker M G,Craine J M,Wedin D,Reich P B,Tilman D.Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species.New Phytologist,2005,167(2):493-508.
[23]徐欢欢.武夷山自然保护区植被垂直分布与特征.武夷科学,2007,23(1):177-180.
[24]何建源,林建丽,刘初钿,陈鹭真,李振基.武夷山自然保护区蕨类植物物种多样性与区系的研究.福建林业科技,2004,31(4):40-43,57-57.
[25]权伟.武夷山不同海拔植被细根的空间变化与季节动态[D].南京:南京林业大学,2008.
[26]权伟,徐侠,王丰,汪家社,方燕鸿,阮宏华,余水强.武夷山不同海拔高度植被细根生物量及形态特征.生态学杂志,2008,27(7):1095-1103.
[27]卢宏典,靳冰洁,钟全林,马玉珠,郭炳桥,郑媛,李曼,程栋梁.中国南方5个地区木本植物根及叶片N、P生态化学计量学特征.安徽农业大学学报,2016,43(3):481-488.
[28]郑成洋,刘增力,方精云.福建黄岗山东南坡和西北坡乔木物种多样性及群落特征的垂直变化.生物多样性,2004,12(1):63-74.
[29]刘信中,方福生.江西武夷山自然保护区科学考察集.北京:中国林业出版社,2001.
[30]Warton D I,Wright I J,Falster D S,Westoby M.Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry.Biological Reviews,2006,81(2):259-291.
[31]Venables W N,Smith D M,the R Core Team.An Introduction to R.Notes on R:A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics.Version 3.5.0 Under development(2017-12-06)[2017-12-20].http://ydl.oregonstate.edu/pub/cran/doc/manuals/r-patched/R-intro.pdf.
[32]那守海.氮磷营养对落叶松幼苗生长的调控[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.
[33]马玉珠,钟全林,靳冰洁,卢宏典,郭炳桥,郑媛,李曼,程栋梁.中国植物细根碳、氮、磷化学计量学的空间变化及其影响因子.植物生态学报,2015,39(2):159-166.
[34]Kerkhoff A J,Enquist B J,Elser J J,Fagan W F.Plant allometry,stoichiometry and the temperature-dependence of primary productivity.Global Ecology and Biogeography,2005,14(6):585-598.
[35]Liu X J,Zhang Y,Han W X,Tang A,Shen J L,Cui Z L,Vitousek P,Erisman J W,Goulding K,Christie P,Fangmeier A,Zhang F S.Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China.Nature,2013,494(7438):459-463.
[36]刘尔平,刘桂生,雷俊杰.闽北果园生态系统大气氮湿沉降研究.江西农业学报,2012,24(7):115-117.
[37]崔晓阳.植物对有机氮源的利用及其在自然生态系统中的意义.生态学报,2007,27(8):3500-3512.
[38]邱燕,张鼎华.南方酸性土壤磷素化学研究进展.福建稻麦科技,2003,21(3):14-17.
[39]刘广路,范少辉,郭宝华,杜满义,李兴军.不同年龄毛竹碳氮磷化学计量特征.热带作物学报,2016,37(2):279-285.
[40]Koerselman W,Meuleman A F M.The vegetation N∶P ratio:a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation.Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(6):1441-1450.
[41]Yuan Z Y,Chen H Y H,Reich P B.Global-scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus.Nature Communications,2011,2(1):344.
[42]Reich P B,Oleksyn J.Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2004,101(30):11001-11006.
[43]Wardle D A,Walker L R,Bardgett R D.Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences.Science,2004,305(5683):509-513.
[44]郑颖,温仲明,宋光,丁曼.环境及遗传背景对延河流域植物叶片和细根功能性状变异的影响.生态学报,2014,34(10):2682-2692.
[45]邹斌,蔡飞,郑景明,戴伟.亚热带天然林4种树木细根生物量垂直分布和主要功能性状的差异.东北林业大学学报,2015,43(3):18-22.
[46]Kong D L,Ma C G,Zhang Q,Li L,Chen X Y,Zeng H,Guo D L.Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species.New Phytologist,2014,203(3):863-872.
[47]Mc Cormack M L,Adams T S,Smithwick E A,Eissenstat D M.Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees.New Phytologist,2012,195(4):823-831.
[48]施宇.延河流域植物功能性状对环境变化的响应和植物适应策略研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[49]Kramer-Walter K R,Bellingham P J,Millar T R,Smissen R D,Richardson S J,Laughlin D C.Root traits are multidimensional:specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum.Journal of Ecology,2016,104(5):1299-1310.
[50]赵国靖.黄土丘陵区两乡土草混播下根系形态特征及其对土壤水分变化的响应[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014.
[51]高德武,王晓辉,蔡体久.公别拉流域露天煤矿排土场植被恢复制约因素及对策.黑龙江水利科技,2003,30(4):95-96.
[52]韦兰英,上官周平.黄土高原白羊草、沙棘和辽东栎细根比根长特性.生态学报,2006,26(12):4164-4170.
[53]寇萌,焦菊英,王巧利,尹秋龙.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被带植物群落的细根分布特征.农业机械学报,2016,47(2):161-171.
[54]徐琨,李芳兰,苟水燕,包维楷.岷江干旱河谷25种植物一年生植株根系功能性状及相互关系.生态学报,2012,32(1):215-225.
[55]Freschet G T,Valverde-Barrantes O J,Tucker C M,Craine J M,Mc Cormack M L,Violle C,Fort F,Blackwood C B,Urban-Mead K R,Iversen C M,Bonis A,Comas L H,Cornelissen J H C,Dong M,Guo D L,Hobbie S E,Holdaway R J,Kembel S W,Makita N,Onipchenko V G,Picon-Cochard C,Reich P B,de la Riva E G,Smith S W,Soudzilovskaia N A,Tjoelker M G,Wardle D A,Roumet C.Climate,soil and plant functional types as drivers of global fine-root trait variation.Journal of Ecology,2017,105(5):1182-1196.
[56]郑淑霞,上官周平.黄土高原地区植物叶片养分组成的空间分布格局.自然科学进展,2006,16(8):965-973.
[57]Macarthur R,Levins R.The limiting similarity,convergence,and divergence of coexisting species.American Naturalist,1967,101(921):377-385.
[58]Lavorel S,Garnier E.Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits:revisiting the Holy Grail.Functional Ecology,2002,16(5):545-556.
[59]Wright I J,Falster D S,Melinda P,Westoby M.Cross-species patterns in the coordination between leaf and stem traits,and their implications for plant hydraulics.Physiologia Plantarum,2006,127(3):445-456.
[60]Westoby M,Falster D S,Moles A T,Vesk P A,Wright I J.Plant ecological strategies:some leading dimensions of variation between species.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,2002,33(1):125-159.
[61]赵文霞,邹斌,郑景明,罗久富.常绿阔叶林常见树种根茎叶功能性状的相关性.北京林业大学学报,2016,38(6):35-41.
[62]胡耀升.长白山森林不同演替阶段植物功能性状及其影响因子的研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2014.
[63]许旸.中国热带27个阔叶树种不同根序细根的形态特征、解剖结构和碳氮研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2011.
[64]郑颖.延河流域植物叶片与细根功能性状的时空变化[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014.
[65]Valverde-Barrantes O J,Blackwood C B.Root traits are multidimensional:specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum:Commentary on Kramer-Walter et al.(2016).Journal of Ecology,2016,104(5):1311-1313.