用户名: 密码: 验证码:
亚热带红壤侵蚀退化区不同恢复水平生境内先锋树种竞争特征
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Competitive patterns of pioneer species at different restoration levels in the subtropical red soil erosion and degradation region
  • 作者:王从容 ; 李守中 ; 杨贤宇
  • 英文作者:WANG Congrong;LI Shouzhong;YANG Xianyu;National Demonstration Center for Experimental Geography Education, Fujian Normal University;Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Mountain Ecology, Fujian Normal University;
  • 关键词:竞争指数 ; 生态恢复 ; 马尾松 ; 侵蚀退化区 ; Voronoi图
  • 英文关键词:competition index;;ecological restoration;;Pinus massoniana;;erosion degradation region;;Voronoi diagram
  • 中文刊名:YYHS
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology
  • 机构:福建师范大学地理学国家级实验教学示范中心;福建师范大学湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-07 09:50
  • 出版单位:应用与环境生物学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.25;No.138
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(31470633);; 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC05054)资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YYHS201902004
  • 页数:7
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:51-1482/Q
  • 分类号:27-33
摘要
以亚热带红壤侵蚀退化区先锋树种马尾松(Pinus massionana Lamb.)和木荷(Schima superba Gardn. et Champ)为研究对象,设置4个不同恢复水平样地,构建Voronoi图确定林木生长空间和邻近竞争木,采用V_Hegyi竞争指数定量分析亚热带红壤丘陵生态恢复早期不同生境恢复阶段先锋树种竞争特征.结果显示:对象木个体竞争强度与其胸径服从幂函数关系(CI=AD~B);随着个体胸径的增大,个体受到的竞争压力逐渐减弱.林木竞争结构和竞争强度在不同样地间具有显著差异(P <0.005),其全林分个体平均竞争强度依次为中等恢复水平样地(3.839 63)>强度侵蚀水平样地(2.315 83)>阔叶树进入样地(2.019 12)>较高恢复水平样地(1.084 75).本研究表明从马尾松占优势的针叶林阶段向针阔混交阶段的生态过程中,林木竞争指数呈现先升后降的趋势,竞争在驱动群落发生演替的同时又受到群落结构变化和个体生长状况的影响而不断调整;因此针对不同生境恢复水平应采取相应措施,以减小竞争对生境恢复带来的不利影响.(图3表4参39)
        The pioneer species Pinus massionana and Schima superba were studied in four sample plots with different restoration levels in the subtropical red soil hill region. The competition patterns of the pioneer species were analyzed at different restoration levels during the early restoration period in the subtropical red soil hill region. A Voronoi diagram was constructed and used to determine the growth space of stems and adjacent competitive trees. The relation between the individual competitive intensity and DBH(diameter at breast height) is defined by the power function CI = AD~B; the competitive intensity decreased with increased DBH(P <0.005). The average individual competition intensity of our plot was in line with medium recovery level(3.839 63), strong erosion level(2.315 83), level of Pinus massionana and Sichima superba mixed forest(2.019 12) and high recovery level(1.084 75). This study showed that from the coniferous forest stage dominated by P. massionana to the ecological process of coniferous and broad-leaf mixed stage, the forest competition index showed a trend of rising first and then decreasing, and competition was driven by community succession, constantly adjusted with the effects of individual growth conditions. Therefore, measures should be taken to reduce the adverse effects of competition on habitat restoration of different habitats.
引文
1马振兴.生态学基础[M].北京:中国时代经济出版社,2002[Ma ZX.Fundamentals of Ecology[M].Beijing:Economic Publishing House of China,2002]
    2 Maleki K,Kiviste A,Korjus H.Analysis of individual tree competition effect on diameter growth of silver birch in Estonia[J].For Syst,2015,24(2):e023
    3 Swenson NG,Enquist BJ.Ecological and evolutionary determinants of a key plant functional trait:wood density and its community-wide variation across latitude and elevation[J].Am J Bot,2007,94(3):451-459
    4 Di Y,Fu X,Wang H,W Li,S Wang.N concentration of old leaves and twigs is more sensitive to stand density than that of young ones in Chinese fir plantations:a case study in subtropical China[J].J For Res,2018(4):1-7
    5龚直文,亢新刚,顾丽.森林植被恢复阶段生态环境动态变化研究[C]//任海,章家恩.第五届中国青年生态学工作者学术研讨会论文集.广东:广东省科学技术协会,2008:511-512[Gong ZW,Kang XG,Gu L.Study on the dynamic changes of ecological environment in forest vegetation restoration phase[C]//Ren H,Zhang JE.Proceedings of the 5th China Youth Ecologists Symposium.Guangdong:Guangdong Provincial Association for Science and Technology,2008:511-512]
    6毛磊,杨丹青,王冬梅,杨晓辉.红花尔基自然保护区天然樟子松林种内种间竞争分析[J].植物资源与环境学报,2008,17(2):9-14[Mao L,Yang DQ,Wang DM,Yang XH.Analyses of intraspecific and interspecific competiton of Pinus sylvestrisver mongolica natural forest in Honghuerji Nature Reserve of Inner Mongolia[J].J.Plant Resour Environ,2008,17(2):9-14]
    7 Ledermann T.Evaluating the performance of semi-distance-independent competition indices in predicting the basal area growth of individual trees[J].Rev Can Recherche For,2010,40(4):796-805
    8 Bi TSD,Kouassi KI,Kouakou KL,KK Koffi,Baudoin JP,Zoro BIA.Existing competitive indices in the intercropping system of Manihot esculenta Crantz and Lagenaria siceraria(Molina)Standley[J].J Plant Interactions,2016,11(1):178-185
    9 Peltoniemi M,M?kip??R.Quantifying distance-independent tree competition for predicting Norway spruce mortality in unmanaged forests[J].For Ecol Manage,2011,261(1):30-42
    10 Bristow M,Vanclay J K,Brooks L,Hunt M.Growth and species interactions of Eucalyptus pellita in a mixed and monoculture plantation in the humid tropics of north Queensland[J].For Ecol Manage,2005,233(2):285-294
    11李清雪,李钢铁,王永胜,邹受益.浑善达克沙地不同立地类型榆树种内竞争分析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,31(3):304-308[Li QX,Li GT,Wang YS,Zou SY.Analysis on individual competitive of eim growing in different site types in Otingdag Sandy Land[J].J.Inner Mongolia Agric Uni(Nat Sci Ed),2010,31(3):304-308]
    12汤孟平,陈永刚,施拥军,周国模,赵明水.基于Voronoi图的群落优势树种种内种间竞争[J].生态学报,2007,27(11):4707-4716[Tang MP,Chen YG,Shi YJ,Zhou GM,Zhao MS.Intraspecific and interspecific competition analysis of community dominant plant populations based in Voronoi diagram[J].Acta Ecol Sin,2007,27(11):4707-4716]
    13游娟,林乐乐,谢磊,崔国发.鹦哥岭海南五针松的种内和种间竞争[J].广西植物,2017,37(6):776-782[You J,Lin LL,Xie L,Cui GF,BF University.Interaspecific and intraspecific competitions of Pinus fenzeliana in Yinggeling,Hainan Province[J].Guihaia,2017,37(6):776-782]
    14 Aakala T,Fraver S,D’Amato A W,Palik BJ.Influence of competition and age on tree growth in structurally complex old-growth forests in northern Minnesota,USA[J].For Ecol Manage,2013,308(4):128-135
    15张泽浦,方精云,菅诚.邻体竞争对植物个体生长速率和死亡概率的影响:基于日本落叶松种群试验的研究[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(3):340-345[Zhang ZP,Fang JY,Kan M.Effects of competition on growth rate and probability of death of plant individuals a study based on nursery experiments of leptolepis populations[J].Acta Phytoecol Sin,2000,24(3):340-345]
    16项小燕,吴甘霖,段仁燕,闫玉梅,张小平.大别山五针松种内和种间竞争强度[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):389-395[Xiang XY,Wu GL,Duan RY,Yan YM,Zhang XP.Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Pinus dabeshanesis[J].Acta Ecol Sin,2015,35(2):389-395]
    17 Anazawa M.Interplay between habitat subdivision and minimum resource requirement in two-species competition[J].Theor Population Biol,2018,120:90-102
    18张炜平,潘莎,贾昕,储诚进,肖洒,林玥,白燕远,王根轩.植物间正相互作用对种群动态和群落结构的影响:基于个体模型的研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(6):571-582[Zhang WP,Pan S,Zhu CJ,Xiao S,Lin Y,Bai YY,Wang GX.Effects of positive plant interactions on population dynamics and community structures:a review based on individual-based simulation models[J].Acta Phytoecol Sin,2013,37(6):571-582]
    19 Chauvet M,Kunstler G,Roy J,Morin X,Russo S.Using a forest dynamics model to link community assembly processes and traits structure[J].Funct Ecol,2017,31(7):1452-1461
    20马志波,黄清麟,庄崇洋,郑群瑞,王宏.基于分层的典型中亚热带天然阔叶林林木竞争关系研究[J].林业科学研究,2018(2):1-10[Ma ZB,Huang QL,Zhuang CY,Zhen QR,Wang H.Competition relationship in typical natural broad-leaved forest community of mid-subtropical zone:based on arbor-layer stratification[J].For Res,2018(2):1-10]
    21张青青,陈志强,陈志彪,马倩怡.南方典型红壤区不同水保措施下坡面产流产沙及稀土迁移特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):46-53[Zhang QQ,Chen ZQ,Chen ZB,Ma YQ.Characteristic of slope runoff and sediment yield and rees migration under different soil and water conservation measures in a typical red soil region of southern China[J].J Soil Water Conservation,2018,32(1):46-53]
    22林培治.福建长汀水土流失区马尾松种群动态及其机制研究[D].福州:福建师范大学,2013[Lin PZ.Population dynamics and mechanism of Pinus massoniana Lamb.in the restoring ecosystem,Changting County of Fujian Province[D].Fuzhou:Fujian Normal University,2013]
    23张欣,杨淑贞,赵明水,李令键,刘亮,陈小勇.天目山自然保护区柳杉种群种内和种间竞争[J].生态与农村环境学报,2004,20(4):10-14[Zhang X,Yang SZ,Zhao MS,Li LJ,Liu L,Chen XY.Intra and interspecific competition within Cryptomeria fortunei populations in the Mountain Tianmu National Nature Reserve[J].J Ecol Rural Environ,2004,20(4):10-14]
    24张池,黄忠良,李炯,史军辉,李林.黄果厚壳桂种内与种间竞争的数量关系[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(1):22-26[Zhang C,Huang LZ,Li J,Shi JX,Li L.Quantitative relationships of intra-and interspecific competition in Cryptocarya concinna[J].Chin J Appl Ecol,2006,17(1):22-26]
    25 Lutz H J.T heveget at ion of hear t’s content,avirgin forest innorthwestern Pennsylvania[J].Ecology,1930,11(1):1-29
    26王林林,唐坚强,张光富,陈亚,黄沙.南京朴树林竞争强度及其群落稳定性[J].生态与农村环境学报,2012,28(6):654-660[Wang LL,Tang JQ,Zhang GF,Chen Y,Huang S.Conmpition intensity and community stability of Celtis sinensis forest in Manjing[J].J Ecol Rural Environ,2012,28(6):654-660]
    27刘发林,曾思齐,吕勇,刘勉声,肖化顺,彭其龙,刘玉.木荷次生林经营密度调控技术的研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(11):26-28[Liu LF,Zen SQ,LüY,Liu MS,Xiao HS,Peng QL,Liu Y.Study on intraspecifc and interspecifc competition in Schima superba[J].JCent South Uni For Technol,2013,33(11):26-28]
    28李志洪,胡淑仪,李伟,李清湖.粤东北马尾松-木荷混交林种内种间竞争强度分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(8):91-95[Li ZH,Hu SY,Li W,Li QH.Intra-specific and inter-specific competitions among major trees species in Pinus massoniana and Schima superba mixed forest in northeastern Guangdong Province[J].J Cent South Univ ForTechnol,2013,33(8):91-95]
    29 HEGYI F.A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands[M]//Friesj J.Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation.Stockholm:Royal College of Forestry,1974:74-90
    30付梦瑶,崔秋芳,吴明,陈家林,杨喜田.松栎混交林中马尾松的种内种间竞争[J].河南农业大学学报,2016(3):311-317[Fu MY,Cui QF,Wu M,Chen JL,Yang XT.Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Pinus massoniana and Quercus acutissima mixed artificial forest[J].JHenan Agricultural Univ,2016,(8):331-317]
    31卢昌泰,李吉跃,康强,黄玉梅,何茜,陶建军,向劲松.马尾松胸径与根径和冠径的关系研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(1):58-63[Fu MY,Cui QF,Wu M,Chen JL,Yang XT.Relationship between DBHand ground diameteras well as crowndiameter of Pinus massoniana[J].J.Beijing For Univ,2008,30(1):58-63]
    32刘怡青,田育红,宋含章,黄薇霖.胸径和林分密度决定内蒙古东部落叶松林种内竞争[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(3):847-853[Liu YQ,Tian YH,Song HZ,Huang WL.DBH and stand density regulate intraspecific competition of Larix gmelinii in eastern Inner Mongolia[J].Chin J Ecol,2018,37(3):847-853]
    33李际平,房晓娜,封尧,孙华,曹小玉,赵春燕,李建军.基于加权Voronoi图的林木竞争指数[J].北京林业大学学报,2015(3):61-68[Li JP,Fang XN,Feng Y,Sun H,Cao XY,Zhao CY,Li JJ.Tree competition indexes based on weighted Voronoi diagram[J].J Beijing For Univ,2015(3):61-68]
    34王海军,程华荣,林石狮,孙延军.深圳羊台山森林公园红鳞蒲桃种内与种间竞争研究[J].广东林业科技,2015(1):23-28[Li JP,Fang XN,Feng Y,Sun H,Cao XY,Zhao CY,Li JJ.Intraspecific and interspecific competition in Syzygium hancei in Yangtai Mountain of Shenzhen[J].Guangdong For Sci Technol,2015(1):23-28]
    35姜春武,徐庆,张蓓蓓,高德强,马迎宾.马尾松光合生理特性及资源利用效率研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2017,30(4):24-28[Jiang CW,Xu Q,Zhang BB,Gao DQ,Ma YB.A review on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics and resource use efficiency of Pinus massoniana[J].World For Res,2017,30(4):24-28]
    36李先琨,欧祖兰,宁世江,苏宗明,唐润琴,李瑞棠.元宝山冷杉群落种内与种间竞争研究[C]//中国科学院科学院生物多样性委员会.生物多样性保护与区域可持续发展--第四届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集.北京:中国林业出版社,2000:20-24[Li XK,Ou ZL,Ning SJ,Su ZM,Tang RQ,Li RT.Study on intra-and interspecies competition of fir community in Yuanbaoshan[C]//Biodiversity Com mit tee of The Chinese Academy of Sciences.Biodiversit y Conser vation and Beglonal Sustainable Development in China:Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in China.Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2000:20-24]
    37和桂青,赵菊,苏泽春,龚云麒,李国庆,李兆光,徐天才,王丽娟,薛润光.不同施肥量及种植密度对拉萨大黄产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(6):70-74[He GQ,Zhao J,Su ZC,Gong YL,Li GQ,Li ZG,Xu TC Wang LJ,Xue RG.Effects of different fertilization rates and planting densities on yield of Rheum lhasaense[J].Chin Agric Sci Bull,2018,34(6):70-74]
    38李博,张大勇,王德华.生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004[Li B,Zhang DY,Wang DH.Ecology-From Individual to Ecosystems[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,2004]
    39邢海涛,陆元昌,刘宪钊,王晓明,贾宏炎,曾冀.基于近自然改造的马尾松林分竞争强度研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(9):42-54[Xing HT,Lu YC,Liu XZ,Wang XM,Jia HY,Zeng J.Competition i ntensit y of Pinu s massoniana st a nd based on close-to-nat u re management[J].J Beijing For Univ,2016,38(9):42-54]

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700