6005A T6铝合金室温拉伸实验方法分析
|
摘要
以GB/T 228.1—2010标准中的方法A和方法B为依据,分别采用应力、应变和横梁位移控制方式对6005A T6铝合金进行室温拉伸实验,通过对比实验结果来筛选理想的实验方法。结果表明:在综合考虑实验结果、实验效率、实验设备损耗和实验曲线连续性等因素下,采用应力-行程控制方法进行6005A T6铝合金的室温拉伸实验比较理想。
Based on the method A and method B in GB/T 228.1—2010 standard, tensile tests of 6005 A T6 aluminum alloy at room temperature are carried out by the control method of stress, strain and beam displacement. The ideal test method is selected through the comparison of test results. The experimental results show that the more ideal tensile test at room temperature for 6005 A T6 aluminum alloy is the stress-stroke control method under overall consideration of these factors such as experimental results, experimental efficiency, loss of experiment equipment and continuity of experimental curves etc..
Based on the method A and method B in GB/T 228.1—2010 standard, tensile tests of 6005 A T6 aluminum alloy at room temperature are carried out by the control method of stress, strain and beam displacement. The ideal test method is selected through the comparison of test results. The experimental results show that the more ideal tensile test at room temperature for 6005 A T6 aluminum alloy is the stress-stroke control method under overall consideration of these factors such as experimental results, experimental efficiency, loss of experiment equipment and continuity of experimental curves etc..
引文
[1]王宇,韩世涛,王周冰,等.轨道车体6005A大截面复杂制品性能分析[J].热处理技术与装备2018,39(3):44-48.
[2]李墨林.基于轻量化与模块化的铝合金车体结构设计[D].大连:大连理工大学,2015.
[3]孙文超.高速列车车体用6005A铝合金弯曲性能提升研究[J].铝加工,2015(5):20-23.
[4]吕丹,苏洪英,杨承波,等.不同控制模式下拉伸实验速率的测试及方法比较[J].理化检验-物理分册2012,48(1):47-52.
[5]刘瑞堂,刘之博,刘锦云.工程材料的力学性能[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业出版社,2001.
[2]李墨林.基于轻量化与模块化的铝合金车体结构设计[D].大连:大连理工大学,2015.
[3]孙文超.高速列车车体用6005A铝合金弯曲性能提升研究[J].铝加工,2015(5):20-23.
[4]吕丹,苏洪英,杨承波,等.不同控制模式下拉伸实验速率的测试及方法比较[J].理化检验-物理分册2012,48(1):47-52.
[5]刘瑞堂,刘之博,刘锦云.工程材料的力学性能[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业出版社,2001.