用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于层次分析法的“环境学概论”课程成绩评定研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on grade evaluation of “Introduction to Environmental Science” based on analytic hierarchy process
  • 作者:顾成林 ; 陈季 ; 杨绪华
  • 英文作者:Gu Chenglin;Chen Ji;Yang Xuhua;School of Science, Jiamusi University;
  • 关键词:环境学概论 ; 成绩评定 ; 过程性评价 ; 层次分析法
  • 英文关键词:introduction to environmental science;;achievement assessment;;process assessment;;analytic hierarchy process
  • 中文刊名:KJXY
  • 英文刊名:Jiangsu Science & Technology Information
  • 机构:佳木斯大学理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-20
  • 出版单位:江苏科技信息
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.602
  • 基金:黑龙江省教育科学规划课题;项目名称:合作学习模式下的高校环境学课程过程性评价研究;项目编号:GBB1317128
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KJXY201917020
  • 页数:4
  • CN:17
  • ISSN:32-1191/T
  • 分类号:70-73
摘要
文章主要针对佳木斯大学地理科学专业必修课"环境学概论"的课程成绩评定进行研究。文章根据学生问卷结果与专业教师访谈确定"环境学概论"课程过程性评价指标要素;通过层次分析法建立合作学习模式下"环境学概论"课程过程性评价指标体系。结果表明:在合作学习模式下"环境学概论"课程的过程性评价中,学生评价与教师评价应占总评价的比重应为2:3;在过程性评价要素"五位一体"中,知识的权重最高,其权重为0.50,其次能力的权重最高,其权重为0.32,而技能、态度与行为的权重持平,均为0.06;在指标层中的过程性评价要素,权重排名前三位的依次是期末考试、协作能力和沟通能力,其中,期末考试的权重为0.36,协作能力与沟通能力的权重并列,均为0.10。权重排在最后的是电脑操作和教具使用,权重均为0.01。
        This study mainly focuses on the evaluation of the course performance of the compulsory course "Introduction to Environmental Science" for Geographic Science Major of Jiamusi University.According to the results of students questionnaires and the interview with the professional teachers,the process evaluation index elements of the course "Introduction to Environmental Science" are determined,and the process evaluation index system of the course "Introduction to Environmental Science" under the mode of cooperative learning is established by analytic hierarchy process.The results show that:In the process evaluation of the course " Introduction to Environmental Science" under the cooperative learning mode,the proportion of student evaluation and teacher evaluation should be 2:3.In the process evaluation element "five in one",the weight of knowledge is the highest,and its weight is 0.50.Secondly,the weight of ability is the highest,and its weight is 0.32,and the weight of skills,a ttitude and behavior is equal,all of which are 0.06.In the index level,the top three weights are final examination,collaborative ability and communication ability,in which the weights of final examination are 0.36,and the weights of collaborative ab ility and communication ability are 0.10.At the end of the weights are comp uter operation and tool use,and the weights are 0.01.
引文
[1]陈季,宋爱迪.基于合作学习的环境学概论课程考核实践研究——以佳木斯大学地理科学专业为例[J].佳木斯大学社会科学学报,2017(1):190-191,194.
    [2]常元伟.深化初中语文课堂合作学习的方式方法[J].教育教学论坛,2012(27):133-134.
    [3]林小兰,杨远帆.大学英语课堂合作学习理论与实践模式的探讨[J].山西大同大学学报(社会科学版),2008(2):91-93.
    [4]张晓明.基于粗糙集—AHM的装备制造业企业创新能力评价指标权重计算研究[J].中国软科学,2014(6):151-158.
    [5]杨小彬,李和明,尹忠东,等.基于层次分析法的配电网能效指标体系[J].电力系统自动化,2013(21):146-150,195.
    [6]邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2012(7):93-100.
    [7]王帅,阴丽娜,冯磊.基于AHP的高速公路投资项目遴选方法研究及应用[J].北方交通,2018(4):158-161,164.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700