摘要
查慎行诗学批评文献主要由《敬业堂诗集》中的论诗诗、《初白庵诗评十二种》及《敬业堂文集》三个部分组成。然而由于文献极为稀见,学界对《初白庵诗评十二种》《敬业堂文集》的了解较少,这种情形制约着对查慎行诗学理论研究的进一步展开,这也是查慎行诗学理论隐而不彰之主要原因。若欲扭转当前学界对查慎行诗学理论盲点的认识,就必须深入挖掘《初白庵诗评十二种》等相关诗学文献,并从中梳理查慎行诗学理论体系的主要框架与基本倾向,以期消弭学界长期以来形成的某些认知误区。
Zha Shenxing's poetry criticism literature mainly consists of three parts, The Jingye Holl Poetry Anthology, The Poetical Comments in Chubai Hut, The Jingye Hall Anthology. However, because of the the last two kinds literature were rare, the academic circles have little understanding of them, which restricts the further development of the research on the Zha Shenxing 's theory of poetics.Therefore, the main reason why Zha Shenxing's poetics theory is not obvious is very closely related to the spread of the two literature.In order to reverse the current academic community's understanding of the blind spot of Zha Shenxing's poetic theory, it is necessary to dig into the relevant poetics literature, and to sort out the main framework and basic tendencies of the theoretical system of the poetic theory of prudance, then we can eliminate some wrong cognition that has been formed in the academic circles for a long time.
引文
[1]吕慧鹃,刘波,卢达.中国历代著名文学家评传:续编三[M].济南:山东教育出版社,1989:257.
[2]张仲谋.清代文化与浙派诗[M].北京:东方出版社,1997:140-170.
[3]蒋寅.清代诗学史:第一卷[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012:490-606.
[4]王英志.清代唐宋诗之争流变史[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2012:154-164.
[5]张金明.清代诗人查慎行研究述评[J].燕山大学学报,2011(4):109-115.
[6]李世英.熟处求生开新境——论查慎行对清代诗歌的贡献[J].北方工业大学学报,1998(4):67-72.
[7]查慎行.初白庵诗评十二种[O].张载华,辑.民国间上海六艺书局石印本.
[8]查慎行.新辑查慎行文集:附录[M].范道济,辑校.郑州:中州古籍出版社,2012:279.
[9]第一历史档案馆.清代文字狱档·陈辉祖奏审拟卓天柱等折[Z].上海:上海书店出版社,1986:548-550.
[10]李圣华.查慎行与《忆鸣诗集》案[J].浙江师范大学学报,2014(3):30-36.
[11]刘世南.清诗流派史[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2004:226.