用户名: 密码: 验证码:
个别正常与骨性Ⅲ类错颞下颌关节的CBCT对比分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:A comparative study on TMJ for skeletal Ⅲ class malocclusion and individual normal occlusion by CBCT
  • 作者:苑芳连 ; 刘志杰 ; 陈立艳 ; 于淑婷 ; 张苗苗
  • 英文作者:YUAN Fanglian;LIU Zhijie;CHEN Liyan;YU Shuting;ZHANG Miaomiao;Department of Orthodontics,School of Stomatology of Harbin Medical University;
  • 关键词:颞下颌关节 ; 个别正常 ; 骨性Ⅲ类 ; CBCT
  • 英文关键词:TMJ;;individual normal occlusion;;skeletal Ⅲ Class malocclusion;;CBCT
  • 中文刊名:KQYX
  • 英文刊名:Stomatology
  • 机构:哈尔滨医科大学口腔医院正畸科;哈尔滨医科大学口腔医院放射科;
  • 出版日期:2017-08-31 08:58
  • 出版单位:口腔医学
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.37;No.238
  • 基金:黑龙江省博士后基金(LRB2008-564)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KQYX201708008
  • 页数:5
  • CN:08
  • ISSN:32-1255/R
  • 分类号:41-45
摘要
目的探讨哈尔滨地区个别正常与骨性Ⅲ类错青年患者颞下颌关节CBCT影像的差异性。方法选取颞下颌关节健康的个别正常志愿者及高角骨性Ⅲ类错患者各40例,两组样本均为哈尔滨地区青年人(年龄为20~28岁)。获取两组牙尖交错位的颞下颌关节CBCT影像,采用Mimics16.0和Simplant O&O软件对颞下颌关节的位置形态进行测量,用SPSS17.0软件进行统计学分析。结果骨性Ⅲ类错组和个别正常组测量结果比较有8个测量项目有明显差异(P<0.05),分别为MI指数、髁突相对位置、髁突半径值、关节窝深、髁突指数、关节窝指数、两侧关节窝外径、两侧髁突长轴夹角。结论哈尔滨地区骨性Ⅲ类错患者与正常人群颞下颌关节位置形态具有差异。
        Objective To compare the difference of TMJ CBCT images between young people with individual normal occlusion and skeletal Ⅲ class malocclusion in Harbin. Methods 40 volunteers with healthy TMJ individual normal occlusion and 40 patients with healthy high-angle skeletal Ⅲ class malocclusion were selected. The age of young people in the two groups was between 20 and 28 years old in Harbin region.Two groups underwent CBCT in the intercuspal position,and measurement of the TMJ morphology and position was conducted with Mimics16.0 and Simplant O&O software. The data was analyzed with SPSS 17. 0 software. Results 8 measurements showed significant differences between individual normal occlusion and the skeletal Ⅲ class malocclusion( P< 0.05),which were MI,AE'/AC,Condylar radius value,depth of glenoid fossa,index of condyles,index of glenoid fossa,outer diameter of glenoid fossa on two sides,the angle of condylar long axis on two sides. Conclusion The morphology and position of TMJ are different between individual normal occlusion and skeletal Ⅲ class malocclusion in Harbin.
引文
[1]Salemi F,Shokri A,Mortazavi H,et al.Diagnosis of simulated condylar bone defects using panoramic radiography,spiral tomography and cone-beam computed tomography:A comparison study[J].Clin Exp Dent,2015,7(1):34-39.
    [2]李岩峰,郭晓倩,苏宏.单侧有症状的颞下颌关节紊乱病患者双侧关节间隙锥形束CT对比研究[J].口腔医学,2016,36(1):40-43.
    [3]吴燕燕,俞焕苗,李帅.全景片与锥形束CT对诊断AngleⅡ2错牙合畸形颞下颌关节改变的研究[J].口腔医学,2016,36(2):158-161
    [4]王婷,厉松.Cone-beam CT技术及其在口腔正畸学中的应用进展[J].北京口腔医学,2011,19(2):113-115.
    [5]Maret D,Molinier F,Braga J,et al.Accuracy of 3D reconstructions based on cone beam computed tomography[J].J Dent Res,2010,89(12):1465-1469.
    [6]Jansen CE.CBCT technology for diagnosis and treatment planning:What general practitioners should consider[J].Compend Contin Educ Dent,2014,35(10):749-753.
    [7]Al Okshi A,Nilsson M,Petersson A,et al.Using Gaf Chromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography[J].Dentomaxillofac Radiol,2013,42(7):280-286.
    [8]Naka jima A,Sameshima GT,Arai Y,et al.Two and three dimensional orthodontic imaging using limited cone beam computed tomography[J].Angle Orthod,2005,75(6):895-903.
    [9]Lorenzoni DC,Bolognese AM,Garib DG,et al.Cone-beam compu-ted tomography and radiographs in dentistry:aspects related to radiation dose[J].Int J Dent,2012,10(4):1-10.
    [10]王智军.CBCT对安氏Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ病人颞下颌关节形态结构的研究[D].福建:福建医科大学,2008.
    [11]王智军,史建陆,许志强,等.CBCT对安氏Ⅱ1和Ⅱ2颞下颌关节形态结构的研究[J].中外健康文摘2011,3(17):34-37.
    [12]Gribel BF,Gribel MN,Frazào DC,et al.Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans[J].Angle Orthod,2011,81(1):26-35.
    [13]么学东,范松青,安高,等.颞下颌关节骨性结构的测量与分析[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2011,27(6):801-804.
    [14]Saccucci M,Polimeni A,Festa F,et al.Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume,surface and shape A3D analysis[J].Head Face Med,2012,8(1):15-23.
    [15]Saccucci M,Attilio MD,Rodolfino D,et al.Condylar volume and condylar area in ClassⅠ,ClassⅡand ClassⅢyoung adult subjects[J].Head Face Med,2012,8(1):34-42.
    [16]Elgüy D,Elgüy M,Fi爧ek9iogˇlu E,et al.Articular eminence inclination,height,and condyle morphology on cone beam computed tomography[J].Scientific World J,2014,13(2):761714.
    [17]Katsavrias EG,Halazonetis DJ.Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns:a morphometric tomographic study[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2005,128(3):337-346.
    [18]王瑞永,马绪臣,张万林,等.健康成年人颞下颌关节间隙锥形束计算机体层摄影术测量分析[J].北京大学学报,2007,39(5):503-506.
    [19]Learreta JA,Barrientos EE.Temporomandibular Joint Method to study the morphology and relationship of the hard structures[J].Cranio,2010,28(4):223-231.
    [20]武杰,李洪发.成人高角骨性Ⅲ类错牙合颞下颌关节锥体束CT测量分析[J].口腔医学研究,2012,28(5):432-435.
    [21]Zahra D,Nasim K.Assessing joint space and condylar position in the people with normal function of temporomandibular joint with cone-beam computed tomography[J].Dent Res J,2012,9(5):607-612.
    [22]Rodrignes AF,Vitral R.Computed tomography evaluation of thetemporomandibular joint in Class I malocclusion patients:condylar symmetryand condyle-fossa relationship[J].Am J Ofthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009,136(2):192-198.
    [23]Machado GL.CBCT imaging-A boon to orthodontics[J].Saudi Dent J,2015,27(1):12-21.
    [24]俞沣洋,卢海平.锥形束CT应用于头影测量的研究进展[J].口腔医学,2016,36(1):84-89.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700