行政学基石范畴的谱系
|
摘要
从学科基本问题及其元概念出发,本文在内容和形式的理性框架内来梳理和界定行政学基石范畴的谱系。行政质料范畴是政治性、统治性、公共性和管理属性的四位一体,学科在内容合理性上形成齐整匹配的理性格局,需要正视行政之于统治的有效性和合法性,促使政治性视野回归,准确定位公共性的坐标,引领技术性向社会工程管理发展。形式基石范畴是基本属性、客体对象、目标和治理方式等概念,纯粹的行政以责任为本位,以制度性为基本属性,以有序为目标,治理方式向网络化治理转换。
The foundation domain is the core concept that determines what administration is and what the study of administration is. Beginning with this subject's basic questions and their meta-concepts, this article categorizes and defines the spectrum of foundation domains in the study of administration, using the rational framework of content and form. The material domain of administration is the quaternity of political, dominant, public and managerial attributes. In order to construct a neat-matching rational pattern in content rationality, this subject needs to value the effectiveness and legitimacy of administration over governance, to force the regression of political horizon, to accurately locate public elements, and to lead technicality into the development of social engineering management. The basic form domain includes the concepts of basic attribute, objective, target, and governance pattern. Pure administration is based on responsibility, takes institutional attribute as a fundamental attribute, aims at good orders and transforms its governance pattern to network governance.
The foundation domain is the core concept that determines what administration is and what the study of administration is. Beginning with this subject's basic questions and their meta-concepts, this article categorizes and defines the spectrum of foundation domains in the study of administration, using the rational framework of content and form. The material domain of administration is the quaternity of political, dominant, public and managerial attributes. In order to construct a neat-matching rational pattern in content rationality, this subject needs to value the effectiveness and legitimacy of administration over governance, to force the regression of political horizon, to accurately locate public elements, and to lead technicality into the development of social engineering management. The basic form domain includes the concepts of basic attribute, objective, target, and governance pattern. Pure administration is based on responsibility, takes institutional attribute as a fundamental attribute, aims at good orders and transforms its governance pattern to network governance.
引文
[1]张文显.论法学的范畴意识、范畴体系与基石范畴[J].法学研究,1991(3).
[2][14][19]罗梁波,颜昌武.从单一性到复合化:中国公共管理研究的现实与未来[J].政治学研究,2018(5).
[3]何艳玲.指向真实实践的中国行政学研究:一个亟待关注的问题[J].中国行政管理,2009(8).
[4]张成福.译者前言[A].罗森布鲁姆等.公共行政学:管理、政治和法律的途径[C].张成福等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.2.
[5][10][15]罗梁波.论行政学研究的基础和取向[A].复旦公共行政评论[C].上海:上海人民出版社,2010.
[6]韦伯.经济与社会(第2卷)[M].阎克文译.上海:上海人民出版社,2010.
[7]董礼胜.西方公共行政学理论评析:工具理性与价值理性的分野与整合[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015.
[8]欧力同,张伟.法兰克福学派研究[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1993.
[9]亚里士多德.形而上学[M].吴寿彭译.北京:商务印书馆,1959.
[11]James H.Svara.The Myth of the Dichotomy:Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration,Public Administration Review,2001,61(2).
[12]Barry Bozeman(ed.).Public Management:The State of the Art.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers,1993.
[16]弗雷德里克森.公共行政的精神[M].张成福等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
[17]罗森布鲁姆等.公共行政学:管理、政治和法律的途径[M].张成福等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[13][18][美]沃尔多.行政国家:美国公共行政的政治理论研究[M].颜昌武译.北京:中央编译出版社,2017.
(1)罗森布鲁姆等就强调公共行政的政治性重在强调“代表性”“政治回应”“责任”等价值,这也突破了传统政治学视野的统治性与阶级性维度。学科的政治性视野应该更进一步打开,着重于行政的过程和内容。
(2)如大数据管理、网络化信息技术、应急管理、公共服务、公共事业管理、公共政策等方面。
[2][14][19]罗梁波,颜昌武.从单一性到复合化:中国公共管理研究的现实与未来[J].政治学研究,2018(5).
[3]何艳玲.指向真实实践的中国行政学研究:一个亟待关注的问题[J].中国行政管理,2009(8).
[4]张成福.译者前言[A].罗森布鲁姆等.公共行政学:管理、政治和法律的途径[C].张成福等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.2.
[5][10][15]罗梁波.论行政学研究的基础和取向[A].复旦公共行政评论[C].上海:上海人民出版社,2010.
[6]韦伯.经济与社会(第2卷)[M].阎克文译.上海:上海人民出版社,2010.
[7]董礼胜.西方公共行政学理论评析:工具理性与价值理性的分野与整合[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015.
[8]欧力同,张伟.法兰克福学派研究[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1993.
[9]亚里士多德.形而上学[M].吴寿彭译.北京:商务印书馆,1959.
[11]James H.Svara.The Myth of the Dichotomy:Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration,Public Administration Review,2001,61(2).
[12]Barry Bozeman(ed.).Public Management:The State of the Art.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers,1993.
[16]弗雷德里克森.公共行政的精神[M].张成福等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
[17]罗森布鲁姆等.公共行政学:管理、政治和法律的途径[M].张成福等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[13][18][美]沃尔多.行政国家:美国公共行政的政治理论研究[M].颜昌武译.北京:中央编译出版社,2017.
(1)罗森布鲁姆等就强调公共行政的政治性重在强调“代表性”“政治回应”“责任”等价值,这也突破了传统政治学视野的统治性与阶级性维度。学科的政治性视野应该更进一步打开,着重于行政的过程和内容。
(2)如大数据管理、网络化信息技术、应急管理、公共服务、公共事业管理、公共政策等方面。