值班律师制度:现实困境与完善路径——以认罪认罚从宽制度为视角

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：The Realistic Dilemma and Future Solutions of Duty Lawyer System——From the Perspective of System of Leniency on Guilty Plea and Acceptance of Punishment 作者：申惠丹 英文作者：SHEN Hui-dan;School of Law,Sichuan University Chengdu; 关键词：值班律师 ; 认罪认罚从宽制度 ; 法律援助 英文关键词：duty lawyer;;system of leniency on guilty plea and acceptance of punishment;;legal aid 中文刊名：MDJD 英文刊名：Journal of Mudanjiang University 机构：四川大学法学院; 出版日期：2019-07-05 出版单位：牡丹江大学学报 年：2019 期：v.28;No.239 语种：中文; 页：MDJD201907027 页数：4 CN：07 ISSN：23-1450/G4 分类号：110-113

摘要

我国的值班律师制度始于2006年河南省修武县开展的试点项目。作为认罪认罚从宽制度的基础性配套制度之一,值班律师制度在保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的诉讼权利方面发挥着重要作用,但在实际运行过程中,也存在着角色定位不清、价值未能完全发挥以及配套保障机制缺失等问题。就未来发展而言,需要明确值班律师的定位、优化值班律师制度运行机制并加强值班律师的工作保障。
        The duty lawyer system in our country was initiated after the experimental duty lawyer pilot project in Xiuwu County, Henan Province in 2006. As one of the basic supporting systems of the system of leniency on guilty plea and acceptance of punishment, the duty lawyer system plays an important role in protecting the rights of the suspect and the accused. However,there also exist some problems in reality such as unclear role definition,value of the system which is not fully exploited,lacking of supporting safeguard mechanism. In the future,it is necessary to define the position of the duty lawyer, optimize the operating mechanism of the duty lawyer system and ensure the performance of their work more efficiently.

引文

[1]赵鹏.我国值班律师制度的构建[D].长春:吉林大学,2012:2.
    [2]闵春雷.认罪认罚案件中的有效辩护[J].当代法学,2017(4):30-31.
    [3]姚莉.认罪认罚程序中值班律师的角色与功能[J].法商研究,2017(6):49.
    [4]熊秋红.审判中心视野下律师的有效辩护[J].当代法学,2017(6):18-19.
    [5]顾永忠,肖沛权.“完善认罪认罚从宽制度”的亲历观察与思考、建议[J].法治研究,2017(1):58.
    [6]甘权仕,王中义.认罪认罚从宽程序中值班律师制度的定位与完善——以“有效的法律帮助”为研究视角[J].中国司法,2017(8):63.
    [7]陈永生.刑事法律援助的中国问题与域外经验[J].比较法研究,2014(1):38-39.
    [8]董红民,麻伟静.构建法律援助值班律师制度实证探析[J].中国司法,2016(10):39.
    [9]郑自文,郭婕.探索建立中国特色的法律援助值班律师制度[J].中国司法,2006(12):76.
    (1)《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第35条规定,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人申请法律援助必须符合一定的条件,且强制指定辩护的对象更是仅限于几类特殊案件。