用户名: 密码: 验证码:
不同坡位对4种阔叶乡土树种叶片养分的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of different slope positions on leaf nutrient of four broadleaf native tree species
  • 作者:余明 ; 王卓敏 ; 薛立
  • 英文作者:YU Ming;WANG Zuomin;XUE Li;College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture,South China Agricultural University;
  • 关键词:阔叶乡土树种 ; 人工林 ; 木荷 ; 灰木莲 ; 乐昌含笑 ; 山杜英 ; 叶片养分 ; 坡位 ; 广东省韶关市
  • 英文关键词:broadleaf native tree species;;artificial forest;;Schima superba;;Manglietia glauca;;Michelia chapensis;;Elaeocarpus sylvestris;;leaf nutrient;;slope position;;Shaoguan City,Guangdong Province
  • 中文刊名:ZNLB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology
  • 机构:华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-08 11:35
  • 出版单位:中南林业科技大学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.215
  • 基金:中央财政林业科技推广示范项目“广东省生态公益林培育技术推广”(2015-GDTK-07);; 广东省林业厅资助项目“韶关市生态公益林碳储量动态估测研究”(粤财农2017-83号)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZNLB201905014
  • 页数:6
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:43-1470/S
  • 分类号:95-100
摘要
对木荷Schima superba、灰木莲Manglietia glauca、乐昌含笑Michelia chapensis、山杜英Elaeocarpus sylvestris在不同坡位的叶片养分含量和叶片化学计量进行了研究,以期揭示这些树种在不同坡位上的适应特征。结果表明:1)4个树种在上坡、中坡和下坡的叶片碳含量范围分别为483.58~527.36、501.99~507.58和473.85~527.18 g·kg~(-1),叶片氮含量范围分别为10.31~14.86、12.34~16.94和11.37~18.38 g·kg~(-1),叶片磷含量范围分别为0.65~1.05、0.82~1.14和0.93~1.44 g·kg~(-1);2)通常上坡的叶片氮、磷含量较低,同一树种不同坡位之间的叶片氮、磷含量大多差异显著;3)4种树种叶片C∶N高于全球平均水平,在上坡、中坡、下坡的分布范围分别为32.5~48.1、29.6~41.0、25.8~45.3;C∶P较低,在上坡、中坡、下坡的分布范围分别为500.1~766.0、439.9~614.0、329.6~557.0;N∶P在上坡、中坡、下坡的分布范围分别为14.0~16.4、12.9~15.1、12.3~16.8。
        The leaf nutrients in four native tree species(Schima superba, Manglietia glauca, Michelia chapensis and Elaeocarpus sylvestris) were investigated and their stoichiometry were studied in Xiaokeng Forest Farm of Shaoguan City, Guangdong Province in order to reveal the adaptation characteristics of these tree species in different slope positions. The results showed that: 1) Leaf C content of four different tree species ranged from 483.58 to 527.36(uphill), 483.58 to 527.36(mid-slope) and 483.58 to 527.36(downhill) g·kg~(-1),uphill leaf N content ranged from 10.31 to 14.86, mid-slope 12.34 to 16.94 and downhill 11.37 to 18.38 g·kg~(-1), and P content(g·kg~(-1)) ranged from uphill 0.65 to 1.05, mid-slope 0.82 to 1.14 and downhill 0.93 to 1.44 g·kg~(-1), respectively. 2) Generally, the leaf nitrogen and phosphorus contents in uphill trees were lower than those of others, and mostly the leaf nitrogen and phosphorus contents of the same tree species at different slope positions had obviously differences each other. 3) Leaf C/N of the four tree species was higher than that of the global average level, ranging from 32.5 to 48.1 at upper-slope, 29.6 to 41.0 at middle-slope and 25.8 to 45.3 at down-slope,respectively; Leaf C/P in the four tree species was lower, ranging from 500.1 to 766.0 at upper-slope, 439.9 to 614.0 at middle-slope and329.6 to 577.0 at down-slope, respectively; Leaf N/P ranged from 14.0 to 16.4 at upper-slope, 12.9 to 15.1 at mid-slope and 12.3 to 16.8,at down-slope, respectively.
引文
[1]薛立,张柔,奚如春,等.华南地区6种阔叶幼苗叶片形态特征的季节变化[J].生态学报,2012,32(1):123-134.
    [2]崔珺,柯立,张驰,等.皖南亚热带常绿阔叶林林下灌木层主要树种叶片养分特征[J].植物资源与环境学报,2014,23(2):34-40.
    [3]马露莎,陈亚南,张向茹,等.黄土高原刺槐叶片生态化学计量学特征[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):57-61.
    [4]刘佳庆,王晓雨,郭焱,等.长白山林线主要木本植物叶片养分的季节动态及回收效率[J].生态学报,2015,35(1):165-171.
    [5]孔令仑,黄志群,何宗明,等.不同林龄杉木人工林的水分利用效率与叶片养分浓度[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(4):1069-1076.
    [6]祁建,马克明,张育新.北京东灵山不同坡位辽东栎(Quercus liaotungensis)叶属性的比较[J].生态学报,2008,28(1):122-128.
    [7]王卓敏,薛达,薛立.阳江5种滨海园林植物的光合特性和叶片元素[J].安徽农业大学学报,2017,44(2):277-277.
    [8]任书杰,于贵瑞,陶波,等.兴安落叶松(Larix gmelinii Rupr.)叶片养分的空间分布格局[J].生态学报,2009,29(4):1899-1906.
    [9]陈珊,陈双林,郭子武,等.林地覆盖经营雷竹林叶片养分特征及其与土壤养分的关系[J].广西植物,2014,34(6):793-798.
    [10]毛金梅,王建友,刘凤兰,等.不同质地土壤不同林龄巴旦木叶片及土壤养分动态变化研究[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(15):202-210.
    [11]PERRY E,HICKMAN G W.A survey to determine the leaf nitrogen concentrations of 25 landscape tree species[J].Journal of Arboriculture,2001,27(3):152-159.
    [12]李因刚,柳新红,马俊伟,等.追施氮肥对浙江楠容器苗生长和叶片养分状况的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(1):33-38.
    [13]罗汉东,朱丛飞,江亮波,等.不同模式施肥对油茶叶片生长及其养分含量的影响[J].经济林研究,2016,34(3):148-152.
    [14]冯梅,黄文娟,李志军.胡杨叶形变化与叶片养分间的关系[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(6):1467-1473.
    [15]刘宏伟,刘文丹,王微,等.重庆石灰岩地区主要木本植物叶片性状及养分再吸收特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(12):4071-4080.
    [16]王卓敏,刘小川,薛立,等.广东横琴岛园林植物叶片和土壤的养分特性研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(10):36-44.
    [17]方怡然,蔡金桓,薛立.3种人工阔叶林的叶片养分和光合特性研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(5):109-114.
    [18]刘落鱼,佘汉基,周彤彤,等.10种茶花苗木叶片的主要养分特征与SLA比较[J].经济林研究,2018,36(3):162-166.
    [19]戚嘉敏,张鹏,奚如春.油茶树体氮磷钾养分的年动态变化[J].经济林研究,2017,35(3):121-126.
    [20]李宏伟,王孝安,郭华,等.黄土高原子午岭不同森林群落叶功能性状[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(3):544-550.
    [21]鲁如坤,时正元,钱承梁.磷在土壤中有效性的衰减[J].土壤学报,2000,37(3):323-329.
    [22]HAN W,FANG J,GUO D,et al.Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China[J].New Phytologist,2010,168(2):377-385.
    [23]OLEKSYN J,REICH P B.Global patterns of plant leaf N and P inrelation to temperature and latitude[J].Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA,2004,101(30):11001-11006.
    [24]吴统贵,陈步峰,肖以华,等.珠江三角洲3种典型森林类型乔木叶片生态化学计量学[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(1):58-63.
    [25]姜沛沛,曹扬,陈云明,等.陕西省3种主要树种叶片、凋落物和土壤N、P化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):443-454.
    [26]郭子武,陈双林,杨清平,等.雷竹林土壤和叶片N、P化学计量特征对林地覆盖的响应[J].生态学报,2012,32(20):6361-6368.
    [27]罗艳,贡璐,朱美玲,等.塔里木河上游荒漠区4种灌木植物叶片与土壤生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(24):8326-8335.
    [28]III F S C,MATSON P A,MOONEY H A.Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology[M].New York:Springer,2002:369-397.
    [29]李洁,周彤彤,薛立.5个阔叶树种叶片的养分特征分析[J].湖南林业科技,2016,43(4):16-20.
    [30]皮发剑,袁丛军,喻理飞,等.黔中天然次生林主要优势树种叶片生态化学计量特征[J].生态环境学报,2016,25(5):801-807.
    [31]STERNER R W.Ecological stoichiometry:the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere[M].New Jersey:Princeton University Press,2002:1-20.
    [32]ELSER J J,FAGAN W F,DENNO R F,et al.Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs[J].Nature,2000,408(6812):578-580.
    [33]陶冶,张元明.古尔班通古特沙漠4种草本植物叶片与土壤的化学计量特征[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(3):659-665.
    [34]HE J S,HAN X G.Ecological stoichiometry:Searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2010,34(1):2-6.
    [35]?GREN G I.The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs-theory and observations[J].Ecology Letters,2010,7(3):185-191.
    [36]阎恩荣,王希华,郭明,等.浙江天童常绿阔叶林、常绿针叶林与落叶阔叶林的C:N:P化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(1):48-57.
    [37]俞月凤,彭晚霞,宋同清,等.喀斯特峰丛洼地不同森林类型植物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(4):947-954.
    [38]胡启武,聂兰琴,郑艳明,等.沙化程度和林龄对湿地松叶片及林下土壤C、N、P化学计量特征影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(9):2246-2255.
    [39]邬畏,何兴东,周启星.生态系统氮磷比化学计量特征研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(2):296-302.
    [40]KOERSELMAN W.The Vegetation N:P Ratio:a New Tool to Detect the Nature of Nutrient Limitation[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(6):1441-1450.
    [41]张立恒,贾志清,王学全,等.共和盆地15种植物叶片的元素化学计量学特征[J].森林与环境学报,2018,38(2):216-221.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700