用户名: 密码: 验证码:
完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术的近期临床疗效对比研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:A comparative study of clinical short-term efficacy between total laparoscopic gastrectomy and laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer
  • 作者:倪立新 ; 朱泓宇 ; 周健 ; 宋辉 ; 杨军 ; 宋庆杰
  • 英文作者:NI Li-xin;ZHU Hong-yu;ZHOU Jian;Department of the Second General Surgery,Qidong People's Hospital;
  • 关键词:胃肿瘤 ; 胃癌根治术 ; 腹腔镜检查 ; 疗效比较研究
  • 英文关键词:Stomach neoplasms;;Radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer;;Laparoscopy;;Comparative effectiveness research
  • 中文刊名:FQJW
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
  • 机构:启东市人民医院;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-20
  • 出版单位:腹腔镜外科杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.24
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:FQJW201901005
  • 页数:5
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:37-1361/R
  • 分类号:31-35
摘要
目的:对比完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术的短期临床疗效,探讨完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的安全性及可推广性。方法:回顾分析2016年1月至2018年7月施行完全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术(完全组,n=36)与腹腔镜辅助下远端胃癌根治术(辅助组,n=42)的临床资料。结果:完全组胃肠吻合时间[(24.2±11.5) min vs.(26.1±10.3) min,t=-4.719,P=0.684]、术中出血量[(42.0±9.5) m L vs.(52.0±11.5) m L,t=-0.792,P=0.416]与辅助组相比差异无统计学意义,但切口长度[(3.0±2.0) cm vs.(6.5±2.5) cm,t=-19.134,P<0.001]、肛门排气时间[(2.0±0.7) d vs.(3.0±0.8) d,t=-8.177,P=0.001]、进食流质时间[(2.5±1.0) d vs.(3.2±0.8) d,t=-8.792,P<0.001]、住院时间[(9.1±1.2) d vs.(11.9±1.5) d,t=-11.921,P<0.001]优于辅助组,且术后患者需要止痛剂剂量[(2.5±1.0)支vs.(4.0±1.2)支,t=-13.713,P<0.001]少。完全组出现吻合口漏1例,辅助组均未发生吻合口相关并发症。结论:完全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术安全、可行,具有创伤小、康复快、住院时间短、疼痛轻等优势,近期疗效显著。
        Objective: To compare the clinical short-term efficacy between total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and to explore the safety and replicability of total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.Methods: The clinical data of 36 patients who received total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and 42 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy from Jan.2016 to Jul.2018 were retrospectively analyzed.Results: Compared with the laparoscopic-assisted group,the gastrointestinal anastomosis time [( 24.2±11.5) min vs.( 26.1±10.3) min,t =-4.719,P = 0.684]and intraoperative blood loss [( 42.0±9.5) m L vs.( 52.0±11.5) m L,t=-0.792,P= 0.416]of the total laparoscopic group were not statistically significantly different,but the length of the incision [( 3.0±2.0) cm vs.( 6.5±2.5) cm,t =-19.134,P<0.001],the anal exhaust time [( 2.0±0.7) d vs.( 3.0±0.8) d,t =-8.177,P =0.001],the fluid intake time [( 2.5±1.0) d vs.( 3.2±0.8) d,t =-8.792,P<0.001] and hospitalization time [( 9.1± 1.2) d vs.( 11.9±1.5) d,t =-11.921,P<0.001] were significantly shorter.Besides,the postoperative analgesic dosage in total laparoscopic group [( 2.5±1.0) vs.( 4.0±1.2),t =-13.713,P<0.001] was reduced.There was 1 case of anastomotic leakage in the total laparoscopic group,while no anastomotic-related complications occurred in the laparoscopic-assisted group.Conclusions: Total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is safe and feasible.It has the advantages of few trauma,quick recovery,short hospital stay and mild pain,the short-term efficacy is remarkable.
引文
[1]Torre LA,Bray F,Siegel RL,et al.Global cancer statistics,2012[S].CA Cancer J Clin,2015,65(2):87-108.
    [2]Chen W,Zheng R,Baade PD,et al.Cancer statistics in China,2015[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2016,66(2):115-132.
    [3]邹文斌,杨帆,李兆申.中国胃癌诊治关键在于提高早期诊断率[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2015,44(1):9-14,53.
    [4]鱼海峰,王道荣.腹腔镜辅助下胃癌D2根治术应用现状[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2009,12(6):514-516.
    [5]余佩武.腹腔镜胃癌根治术的原则与评价[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2009,16(1):1-5.
    [6]牟一平.完全腹腔镜胃癌根治术消化道重建方式的选择及技巧[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2012,17(5):339-341.
    [7]臧潞.腹腔镜胃癌手术的消化道重建[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(8):787-789.
    [8]余佩武,钱锋,郝迎学,等.腹腔镜胃癌根治术726例的疗效分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2011,10(1):44-47.
    [9]罗国德,曹永宽,张林,等.腹腔镜与开腹手术对进展期胃癌D2根治术的临床对比分析[J].华西医学,201l,26(9):1323-1326.
    [10]Ohtani H,Tamamori Y,Noguchi K,et al.Meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J].J Surg Res,2011,171(2):479-485.
    [11]Chen WJ,Xu CY,Shen JG,et al.Outcome of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy vs.open gastrectomy for gastric cancer:a retrospective comparative study[J].Hepatogastroenterology,2012,59(115):938-941.
    [12]Oki E,Sakaguchi Y,Ohgaki K,et al.The impact of obesity on the use of a totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer[J].J Gastric Cancer,2012,12(2):108-112.
    [13]Ikeda O,Sakaguchi Y,Aoki Y,et al.Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(10):2374-2379.
    [14]Strong VE,Devaud N,Allen PJ,et al.Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma:a case-control study[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2009,16(6):1507-1513.
    [15]Carboni F,Lepiane P,Santoro R,et al.Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer:preliminary experience[J].Gastric Cancer,2005,8(2):75-77.
    [16]Kim JJ,Song KY,Chin HM,et al.Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy with various types of intracorporeal anastomosis using laparoscopic linear staplers:preliminary experience[J].Surg Endosc,2008,22(2):436-442.
    [17]Bracale U,Marzano E,Nastro P,et al.Side-to-side esophagojejunostomy during totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy for malignant disease:a multicenter study[J].Surg Endosc,2010,24(10):2475-2479.
    [18]蔡逊,叶家欣,马丹丹,等.完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术近期临床疗效的对比研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2016,23(2):186-191.
    [19]朱甲明,刘晶晶,文大成,等.全腔镜下吻合技术在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2013,16(9):881-884.
    [20]徐晓武,潘宇,陈钶,等.完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术对比研究的meta分析[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2014,43(5):591-596.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700