用户名: 密码: 验证码:
内固定术与人工关节置换术治疗老年髋部骨折的临床效果观察
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Clinical Effect Observation of Internal Fixation and Artificial Joint Replacement in the Treatment of Hip Fracture in Elderly Patients
  • 作者:陈仁浩
  • 英文作者:CHEN Renhao;Beijing Zhongguancun Hospital;
  • 关键词:髋部骨折 ; 内固定术 ; 人工关节置换术 ; 老年患者
  • 英文关键词:Hip fracture;;Internal fixation;;Artificial joint replacement;;Elderly patients
  • 中文刊名:YJZY
  • 英文刊名:Chinese and Foreign Medical Research
  • 机构:北京市中关村医院;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-05
  • 出版单位:中外医学研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.17;No.417
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YJZY201913012
  • 页数:3
  • CN:13
  • ISSN:23-1555/R
  • 分类号:33-35
摘要
目的:比较老年髋部骨折患者内固定术与人工关节置换术治疗的效果。方法:选取2015年12月-2018年11月笔者所在医院收治的64例老年髋部骨折患者,分别经内固定术(内固定组)及人工关节置换术(人工关节组)治疗。比较两组手术相关指标、术后并发症发生率、术后3个月髋关节功能评分的随访结果。结果:两组患者的手术持续时间,术中出血量、术中及术后输血总量、术后引流量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);内固定组下地负重时间晚于人工关节组,且术后并发症发生率高于人工关节组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3个月随访,人工关节组患者的髋关节功能恢复效果优于内固定组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:老年髋部骨折患者经人工关节置换术后并发症更少,髋关节功能恢复更好。
        Objective:To analyze the effect of internal fixation and artificial joint replacement in the treatment of elderly patients with hip fracture.Method:A total of 64 cases of elderly patients with hip fracture from December 2015 to November 2018 in our hospital were treated with internal fixation(internal fixation group) and artificial joint replacement(artificial joint group).Compared the related indexes of operation,incidence of postoperative complications,the3 months after operation follow-up results about hip function score.Result:Compared the duration of operation,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion,postoperative drainage between the two groups,the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).While the load bearing time of the internal fixation group was later than that of the artificial joint group and the complication rate of postoperative complications was higher than that of the artificial joint group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The follow-up results of hip function score at 3 months after operation showed that the effect of hip function recovery in the artificial joint group was better than that in the internal fixation group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Elderly patients with hip fracture have fewer complications and better recovery of hip function after artificial joint replacement.
引文
[1]刘承鸿,陈震东,黄世桥,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定与髋关节置换治疗高龄骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折患者的疗效及围术期处理[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(13):3149-3151.
    [2]戴军,赵鉴非,佟刚.老年髋部骨折内固定与人工髋关节置换术的临床疗效比较[J].创伤外科杂志,2016,11(2):105-108.
    [3]侯颖周.老年髋部骨折行内固定术与人工髋关节置换术的临床对比研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(8):65-66.
    [4]杨明轩,罗志强,刘昊楠,等.内固定与全髋关节置换治疗移位型股骨颈骨折的中期疗效[J].实用医学杂志,2017,33(10):1651-1655.
    [5]周锦春,陈哲峰,宋黄鹤,等.全髋关节置换与内固定治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折的远期疗效及费用比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2015,17(2):114-117.
    [6]徐斌,王群,金华,等.空心钉内固定和关节置换术治疗移位型股骨颈骨折的成本效用分析[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97(21):1650.
    [7]金天明,黄燕.髋关节置换手术与动力髋螺钉内固定治疗移位型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国现代医学杂志,2017,27(23):112-116.
    [8]郑佐慧,谭志伟,冯经旺,等.内固定与人工髋关节置换术治疗老年髋部骨折的疗效及经济性比较[J].山西医药杂志,2017,46(15):1841-1843.
    [9]孙友强,邵敏,何伟,等.人工关节置换与内固定修复老年股骨转子间骨折的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,20(13):1954-1960.
    [10]吴畏,李波.内固定和关节置换治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤杂志,2015,31(6):537-539.
    [11]岳玲,丁薇,綦珂,等.老年髋部骨折后肺部感染危险因素分析[J].中国临床保健杂志,2016,19(3):282-284.
    [12]曾国华,谢泰安,刘胜元,等.老年髋部骨折行内固定术与人工髋关节置换术的效果比较[J].浙江临床医学,2015,17(12):2140-2141.
    [13]王旌晶,邹永根,唐燕红,等.人工关节置换与内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,13(14):44-46.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700