从2018雅加达亚运会田径比赛成绩看亚洲田径格局
|
摘要
本文以2018雅加达亚运会田径比赛成绩为研究对象,采用文献资料法等研究方法对亚洲各地区和国家田径竞技项目和项群进行了研究,并对亚洲田径发展趋势进行了分析。结果表明:东亚地区获得金牌和奖牌数最多,西亚地区紧随其后,南亚地区实力强劲,中亚和东南亚地区田径竞技实力较弱;东亚地区在快速性力量项群项目具有明显的优势,西亚地区则在速度性项群和耐力性项群项目上具有较强的竞争力,南亚、中亚和东南亚地区尚未形成优势项群;总体来说,亚洲地区田径竞争格局发展趋势表现在东亚地区实力强劲,但优势不再明显、西亚地区强势崛起、南亚地区印度独树一帜、东南亚和中亚地区田径竞技实力薄弱。
In this paper,the track and field results of the Asian Games in Jakarta in 2018 were taken as the research object,and the track and field events and events groups of different regions and countries in Asia were studied by using the method of literature,and the development trend of Asian track and field was analyzed. The results show that East Asia has the largest number of gold medals and medals,followed by West Asia; South Asia is strong,Central Asia and Southeast Asia is weak in track and field competitiveness; East Asia has obvious advantages in speed strength event group,West Asia has strong competitiveness in speed event group and endurance event group. South Asia,Central Asia and Southeast Asia has not yet formed an advantage group. Overall,the development trend of track and field competition pattern in Asia is strong in East Asia,but the advantage is no longer obvious.Strong rise was seen in West Asia,and India is unique in South Asia,with the weak competitiveness in Southeast and Central Asia.
In this paper,the track and field results of the Asian Games in Jakarta in 2018 were taken as the research object,and the track and field events and events groups of different regions and countries in Asia were studied by using the method of literature,and the development trend of Asian track and field was analyzed. The results show that East Asia has the largest number of gold medals and medals,followed by West Asia; South Asia is strong,Central Asia and Southeast Asia is weak in track and field competitiveness; East Asia has obvious advantages in speed strength event group,West Asia has strong competitiveness in speed event group and endurance event group. South Asia,Central Asia and Southeast Asia has not yet formed an advantage group. Overall,the development trend of track and field competition pattern in Asia is strong in East Asia,but the advantage is no longer obvious.Strong rise was seen in West Asia,and India is unique in South Asia,with the weak competitiveness in Southeast and Central Asia.
引文
[1]张莉清,冯树勇,白银川.从历届世锦赛看中国田径的未来和发展——对莫斯科世锦赛的思考[J]. 2014,40(1):85-88.
[2]刘昌亚.从2014年韩国仁川亚运会田径比赛看亚洲田径格局[J].四川体育科学,2015(3):57-60.
[3]卢元镇.体育社会学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2014:279.
[4]孙作乐.伦敦世锦赛世界田坛格局与中国田径竞技表现分析[J].南京体育学院学报,2018,1(1):64-70.
[5]钟丹.亚运会男子短跑竞争格局及发展趋势分析[J].长春师范大学学报,2017,36(8):107-110.
[6]刘金飞,王加新.仁川亚运会亚洲田径竞技实力分析[J].四川体育科学,2016,35(1):66-101.
[7]杜放,李红梅,郑洪才,等.第13届世界田径锦标赛竞争格局及我国田径竞技实力剖析[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2013,31(6):87-92.
[8]连小刚,曹景川,武旭. 21世纪初我国田径运动发展现状——近四届奥运会田径比赛结果分析[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2013,31(5):84-88.
[9]李良胤.多维视阈下发达国家高校竞技体育人才培养模式的启示[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2012,30(4):81-84.
[2]刘昌亚.从2014年韩国仁川亚运会田径比赛看亚洲田径格局[J].四川体育科学,2015(3):57-60.
[3]卢元镇.体育社会学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2014:279.
[4]孙作乐.伦敦世锦赛世界田坛格局与中国田径竞技表现分析[J].南京体育学院学报,2018,1(1):64-70.
[5]钟丹.亚运会男子短跑竞争格局及发展趋势分析[J].长春师范大学学报,2017,36(8):107-110.
[6]刘金飞,王加新.仁川亚运会亚洲田径竞技实力分析[J].四川体育科学,2016,35(1):66-101.
[7]杜放,李红梅,郑洪才,等.第13届世界田径锦标赛竞争格局及我国田径竞技实力剖析[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2013,31(6):87-92.
[8]连小刚,曹景川,武旭. 21世纪初我国田径运动发展现状——近四届奥运会田径比赛结果分析[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2013,31(5):84-88.
[9]李良胤.多维视阈下发达国家高校竞技体育人才培养模式的启示[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2012,30(4):81-84.