破宋人拘挛,多持平之论——王若虚文体学思想论析
|
摘要
王若虚文体学思想是其文学思想的重要组成部分,与其经学、史学思想亦有相通之处,在金代文体批评史上独成体系,堪与宋代欧阳修、黄庭坚、朱熹等文体学思想比肩。他主张以"体制为先"的辨体尊体为基础,同时肯定"不必以寻常体制绳之"的破体和变体观,在"以文为诗"和"以诗为词"上多持平之论。总体来说,秉持"大体须有,定体则无"的辩证通达文体观,破除了宋人之拘挛。
Wang Ruoxu's stylistic thought is an important part of his literary thought,and has something in common with his Confucian classics and historiography. It has a unique system in the history of Jin dynasty's stylistic criticism and can be compared with Ouyang Xiu's,Huang Ting-jian's and Zhu Xi's stylistic thoughts in the Song dynasty. He advocated that"system first"should be the basis of distinguishing style and respecting style. He also affirmed the breaking and variant view of "needn't be tied to the ordinary system". He held a more balanced view on"taking essay as poetry"and"taking poetry as poetry". Generally speaking,the adherence to the dialectical and accessible literary style of"generally there must be,but concretely there is not a set style"broke the constraints of the Song dynasty.
Wang Ruoxu's stylistic thought is an important part of his literary thought,and has something in common with his Confucian classics and historiography. It has a unique system in the history of Jin dynasty's stylistic criticism and can be compared with Ouyang Xiu's,Huang Ting-jian's and Zhu Xi's stylistic thoughts in the Song dynasty. He advocated that"system first"should be the basis of distinguishing style and respecting style. He also affirmed the breaking and variant view of "needn't be tied to the ordinary system". He held a more balanced view on"taking essay as poetry"and"taking poetry as poetry". Generally speaking,the adherence to the dialectical and accessible literary style of"generally there must be,but concretely there is not a set style"broke the constraints of the Song dynasty.
引文
[1]胡传志,李定乾.滹南遗老集校注[M].沈阳:辽海出版社,2006.
[2]吴承学.中国古代文体学研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2011.
[3]郑永晓.黄庭坚全集辑校编年[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2011.
[4]祝尧.古赋辨体[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[5]何文焕.历代诗话[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[6]王水照.宋代文学通论[M].开封:河南大学出版社,1997.
[7]胡应麟.诗薮[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1958.
[8]陈造.江湖长翁集[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[9]罗大经.鹤林玉露[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[10]刘祁.归潜志[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[11]吴承学.辨体与破体[J].文学评论,1991(4).
[12]李延寿.南史[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[13]蔡景康.明代文论选[C].北京:人民文学出版社,1993.
[14]郭绍虞.中国历代文论选(第2册)[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.
[25]刘辉.王若虚的经学思想研究[J].社会科学战线,2011(3).
[26]何俊,范立舟.南宋思想史[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.
[2]吴承学.中国古代文体学研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2011.
[3]郑永晓.黄庭坚全集辑校编年[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2011.
[4]祝尧.古赋辨体[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[5]何文焕.历代诗话[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[6]王水照.宋代文学通论[M].开封:河南大学出版社,1997.
[7]胡应麟.诗薮[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1958.
[8]陈造.江湖长翁集[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[9]罗大经.鹤林玉露[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[10]刘祁.归潜志[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[11]吴承学.辨体与破体[J].文学评论,1991(4).
[12]李延寿.南史[M].文渊阁四库全书影印本.
[13]蔡景康.明代文论选[C].北京:人民文学出版社,1993.
[14]郭绍虞.中国历代文论选(第2册)[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.
[25]刘辉.王若虚的经学思想研究[J].社会科学战线,2011(3).
[26]何俊,范立舟.南宋思想史[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.