长江经济带工业绿色发展效率测量与提升路径研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Research on Measurement and Promotion Path of Industrial Green Development Efficiency in Yangtze River Economic Belt 作者：王建民 ; 仇定三 ; 蒋倩颖 ; 张敏 英文作者：Wang Jianmin;Qiu Dingsan;Jiang Qianying;Zhang Min;School of Economics and Management, Anhui University Of Science And Technology;School of Economics, Fudan University; 关键词：长江经济带 ; 绿色发展效率 ; 改进的灰色关联度 ; 发展路径 英文关键词：Yangtze River economic belt;;green development efficiency;;improved grey relational degree;;development path 中文刊名：KJGL 英文刊名：Science and Technology Management Research 机构：安徽理工大学经济与管理学院;复旦大学经济学院; 出版日期：2019-06-20 出版单位：科技管理研究 年：2019 期：v.39;No.430 基金：国家自然科学基金面上项目“区域承接产业低碳发展绩效评价与驱动模式创新”(71473001);; 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“我国碳金融发展驱动政策设计与路径创新”(2017M621324) 语种：中文; 页：KJGL201912006 页数：7 CN：12 ISSN：44-1223/G3 分类号：53-59

摘要

基于长江经济带2007—2016年11省市面板数据,运用Super-SBM模型与Malmquist指数对工业绿色发展效率进行动静分析;并结合改进的灰色斜率关联模型分析影响工业绿色发展效率的因素。研究表明,长江经济带工业绿色发展效率呈上升趋势,区域差别显著;技术进步对工业绿色发展效率提高的贡献率高,提升潜力大;经济发展水平、城镇化等因素促进工业绿色发展效率提升,工业产业结构和环境规制则具有抑制作用。最后提出提高长江经济带工业绿色发展效率的发展路径。
        Based on the panel data of 11 provinces and cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in 2007-2016 years, the Super-SBM model and Malmquist index are used to analyze the industrial green development efficiency, and the factors that affect the industrial green development efficiency are analyzed with the improved grey slope correlation model. The research shows that the industrial green development efficiency of the Yangtze River Economic Zone is on the rise, the regional difference is remarkable, the contribution rate of the technological progress to the industrial green development efficiency is high, the promotion potential is great. The economic development level, urbanization and other factors promote the industrial green development efficiency, and the industrial structure and environmental regulation are suppressed. The research finally puts forward the development path to improve the green development efficiency of the Yangtze River economic belt.

引文

[1]王建民,杨文培,杨力.双赢目标约束下中国能源结构调整测算[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(3):27-36.
    [2]YANG L,WANG J M,SHI J.Can China meet its 2020 economic growth and carbon emissions reduction targets?[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,142:993-1001.
    [3]李小玉,邱信丰.长江中游城市群工业绿色发展协作机制研究[J].经济纵横,2017(10):67-74.
    [4]UNIDO.Green industry:policies for supporting green industry[R].Vienna:UNIDO,2011.
    [5]张纯洪,刘海英.地区发展不平衡对工业绿色全要素生产率的影响:基于三阶段DEA调整测度效率的新视角[J].当代经济研究,2014(9):39-45.
    [6]邱虹,朱南,张为波.中国省域工业生态经济效率实证分析:基于两阶段效率评价模型[J].生态经济,2016,32(8):41-46.
    [7]杨亦民,王梓龙.湖南工业生态效率评价及影响因素实证分析:基于DEA方法[J].经济地理,2017,37(10):151-156.
    [8]王晓玲,方杏村.东北老工业基地生态效率测度及影响因素研究:基于DEA-Malmquist-Tobit模型分析[J].生态经济,2017,33(5):95-99.
    [9]岳鸿飞,徐颖,周静.中国工业绿色全要素生产率及技术创新贡献测评[J].上海经济研究,2018(4):52-61.
    [10]TONE K.A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J].European Journal of Operation Research,2001,130(3):498-509.
    [11]TONE K.A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2002,143(1):32-41.
    [12]孙玉刚,党耀国.灰色斜率关联度的改进模型[J].统计与决策,2007(15):12-13.
    [13]刘晓萌,孟祥瑞,汪克亮.城市工业生态效率测度与评价:安徽的实证[J].华东经济管理,2016,30(8):29-34.
    [14]梁星,卓得波.中国区域生态效率评价及影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2017(19):143-147.
    [15]宫大鹏,赵涛,慈兆程,等.基于超效率SBM的中国省际工业化石能源效率评价及影响因素分析[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(2):585-595.