沼液施用量对毛竹林地土壤理化性质及碳储量的影响
|
摘要
为了解决沼液资源化利用,化肥减施的问题,该文以沼液替代化肥来研究相同氮磷钾含量肥料施用的前提下,不同沼液用量与化肥配合施用(N_1P_1K_1Z_1—沼液全氮替代化肥施氮总量的25%,N_2P_2K_2Z_2—沼液全氮替代化肥施氮总量的50%,N_3P_3K_3Z_3—沼液全氮替代化肥施氮总量的75%)对毛竹林地土壤理化性质及竹林固碳增汇效应的影响。结果表明,单独施用化肥或者化肥与沼液配合施用对毛竹林地土壤pH值、有机质、全氮、磷、钾含量的影响不明显(P>0.05),而沼液与化肥配合施用(特别是N_3P_3K_3Z_3—高量沼液)对土壤碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾含量提高的幅度较为显著(单施化肥处理除外)(P<0.05)。单独施用化肥或化肥与沼液配施显著降低了放线菌的比例(单施化肥处理除外),却显著增加了细菌和真菌的比例(P<0.05)。与不施肥对照CK处理相比,单施化肥处理显著增加了细菌与真菌数量的比值,增幅为24.51%;而沼液与化肥配施则与CK处理之间的差异不显著(P>0.05)。化肥与沼液配施均能显著提高毛竹林地土壤微生物量碳和氮的含量,而且能够显著提高土壤蔗糖酶、脲酶、过氧化氢酶的活性(P<0.05),各施肥处理均以N_3P_3K_3Z_3提高的幅度最大。此外,单独施用化肥或者化肥与沼液配施均能显著提高I度竹、II度竹和林分的平均胸径以及I度竹和林分的碳储量(P<0.05),各施肥处理仍以N_3P_3K_3Z_3处理增加的幅度最大。可见,施用沼液替代化肥能够提升土壤肥力水平,促进毛竹生长,尤其是新竹的生长和固碳增汇。
In order to solve the problem of resource utilization of biogas slurry and the reduction of chemical fertilizers, in this study, we worked on the effects of combined application of different biogas slurry dosages and chemical fertilizers(all treatments receiving the same amount of NPK application) on soil physical and chemical properties and carbon sink enhancement of bamboo forest. The result showed that the solo application of chemical fertilizers(NPK treatment) or combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers(N_1P_1K_1Z_1—total nitrogen in biogas slurry replaced 25% of the total application amount of chemical fertilizer, N_2P_2K_2Z_2—total nitrogen in biogas slurry replaced50% of the total application amount of chemical fertilizer, N_3P_3K_3Z_3—total nitrogen in biogas slurry replaced 75% of the total application amount of chemical fertilizer) had no obvious effects on the soil pH values and the contents of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium(P>0.05), while the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers(especially N_3P_3K_3Z_3 treatment-high dosage biogas slurry) significantly increased the contents of soil alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium(P<0.05). Compared to the CK treatment, solo application of chemical fertilizers slightly decreased the proportion of actinomycetes(P>0.05), while the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly decreased the proportion of actinomycetes(P<0.05), and significantly increased the proportions of bacterial and fungi, respectively(P<0.05). Relative to the CK treatment, NPK treatment significantly increased the ratio of bacteria to fungi by 24.51%(P<0.05), while the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers decreased the ratio of bacteria to fungi to different degrees with no significant difference(P>0.05). Solo application of chemical fertilizers had no significant effects on the contents of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen of bamboo forest(P>0.05), but the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly increased the contents of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen by 19.3%-62.0% and 52.7%-147.3%, respectively(P<0.05). Compared to the CK treatment, solo chemical fertilizers or combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly decreased the ratio of soil microbial biomass carbon to microbial biomass nitrogen(P<0.05). The solo application of chemical fertilizers had no significant effect on invertase activity(P>0.05), but the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly increased the invertase activity by 46.2%-138.5%(P<0.05). The solo application of chemical fertilizers or combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly improved urease activity by 7 to 14.5 times compared to the CK(P<0.05). Application of fertilizers significantly increased the acid phosphatase activity in the NPK and N_1P_1K_1Z_1 treatments compared to the CK, respectively(P<0.05), but no significant difference was found among CK, N_2P_2K_2Z_2 and N_3P_3K_3Z_3 treatments. There were no significant(P>0.05) difference among the CK, NPK, N_1P_1K_1Z_1 and N_2P_2K_2Z_2 treatments of catalase activity. In summary, the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers could significantly increase soil available nutrient contents, the proportions of bacterial and fungi, soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, and the activity of invertase, urease and catalase. In all fertilization treatments, the increase of above indicators under N_3P_3K_3Z_3 treatment was the most obvious. In addition, all fertilization treatments significantly increased the mean diameter at breast height of one-year bamboo, two-year bamboo and bamboo stand by 38.9%-61.7%, 11.8%-18.8%, and 13.1%-24.4%, respectively(P<0.05). In addition, all fertilization treatments significantly increased carbon storage of one-year bamboo and bamboo stand by 41.5%-179.0% and 26.3%-39.0%, respectively(P<0.05). For all fertilization treatments, the increase of mean diameter at breast height and carbon storage of one-year bamboo under N_3P_3K_3Z_3 treatment was the most obvious. It could be seen that the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers could increase soil fertility, promote the growth of bamboo(especially newly grown bamboo) and increase carbon sequestration of bamboo.
In order to solve the problem of resource utilization of biogas slurry and the reduction of chemical fertilizers, in this study, we worked on the effects of combined application of different biogas slurry dosages and chemical fertilizers(all treatments receiving the same amount of NPK application) on soil physical and chemical properties and carbon sink enhancement of bamboo forest. The result showed that the solo application of chemical fertilizers(NPK treatment) or combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers(N_1P_1K_1Z_1—total nitrogen in biogas slurry replaced 25% of the total application amount of chemical fertilizer, N_2P_2K_2Z_2—total nitrogen in biogas slurry replaced50% of the total application amount of chemical fertilizer, N_3P_3K_3Z_3—total nitrogen in biogas slurry replaced 75% of the total application amount of chemical fertilizer) had no obvious effects on the soil pH values and the contents of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium(P>0.05), while the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers(especially N_3P_3K_3Z_3 treatment-high dosage biogas slurry) significantly increased the contents of soil alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium(P<0.05). Compared to the CK treatment, solo application of chemical fertilizers slightly decreased the proportion of actinomycetes(P>0.05), while the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly decreased the proportion of actinomycetes(P<0.05), and significantly increased the proportions of bacterial and fungi, respectively(P<0.05). Relative to the CK treatment, NPK treatment significantly increased the ratio of bacteria to fungi by 24.51%(P<0.05), while the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers decreased the ratio of bacteria to fungi to different degrees with no significant difference(P>0.05). Solo application of chemical fertilizers had no significant effects on the contents of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen of bamboo forest(P>0.05), but the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly increased the contents of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen by 19.3%-62.0% and 52.7%-147.3%, respectively(P<0.05). Compared to the CK treatment, solo chemical fertilizers or combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly decreased the ratio of soil microbial biomass carbon to microbial biomass nitrogen(P<0.05). The solo application of chemical fertilizers had no significant effect on invertase activity(P>0.05), but the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly increased the invertase activity by 46.2%-138.5%(P<0.05). The solo application of chemical fertilizers or combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers significantly improved urease activity by 7 to 14.5 times compared to the CK(P<0.05). Application of fertilizers significantly increased the acid phosphatase activity in the NPK and N_1P_1K_1Z_1 treatments compared to the CK, respectively(P<0.05), but no significant difference was found among CK, N_2P_2K_2Z_2 and N_3P_3K_3Z_3 treatments. There were no significant(P>0.05) difference among the CK, NPK, N_1P_1K_1Z_1 and N_2P_2K_2Z_2 treatments of catalase activity. In summary, the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers could significantly increase soil available nutrient contents, the proportions of bacterial and fungi, soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, and the activity of invertase, urease and catalase. In all fertilization treatments, the increase of above indicators under N_3P_3K_3Z_3 treatment was the most obvious. In addition, all fertilization treatments significantly increased the mean diameter at breast height of one-year bamboo, two-year bamboo and bamboo stand by 38.9%-61.7%, 11.8%-18.8%, and 13.1%-24.4%, respectively(P<0.05). In addition, all fertilization treatments significantly increased carbon storage of one-year bamboo and bamboo stand by 41.5%-179.0% and 26.3%-39.0%, respectively(P<0.05). For all fertilization treatments, the increase of mean diameter at breast height and carbon storage of one-year bamboo under N_3P_3K_3Z_3 treatment was the most obvious. It could be seen that the combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizers could increase soil fertility, promote the growth of bamboo(especially newly grown bamboo) and increase carbon sequestration of bamboo.
引文
[1]Seiler C,Hutjes R W A,Kruijt B,et al.The sensitivity of wet and dry tropical forests to climate change in Bolivia[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Biogeosciences,2015,120(3):399-413.
[2]Lan Q,Lewis S L,Sullivan M J P,et al.Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects[J].Nature Communications,2017,8(1):1-11.
[3]Wang Z,Li Y,Chang S X,et al.Contrasting effects of bamboo leaf and its biochar on soil CO2 efflux and labile organic carbon in an intensively managed Chinese chestnut plantation[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2014,50(7):1109-1119.
[4]Zhou G M,Jiang P K,Mo L F.Bamboo:A possible approach to the control of global warming[J].International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation,2009,10(4):547-550.
[5]张厚喜,庄舜尧,季海宝,等.我国南方毛竹林生态系统碳储量的估算[J].土壤,2014,46(3):413-418.Zhang Houxi,Zhuang Shunyao,Ji Haibao,et al.Estimating carbon storage of moso bamboo forest ecosystem in southern China[J].Soils,2014,46(3):413-418.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]刘恩斌,施拥军,李永夫,等.基于非空间结构的浙江省毛竹林固碳潜力[J].林业科学,2012,48(11):9-14.Liu Enbin,Shi Yongjun,Li Yongfu,et al.Carbon sequestration potential of Moso bamboo forest in Zhejiang province based on the non-spatial structure[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2012,48(11):9-14.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]马少杰,李正才,王斌,等.不同经营类型毛竹林土壤活性有机碳的差异[J].生态学报,2012,32(8):2603-2611.Ma Shaojie,Li Zhengcai,Wang Bin,et al.Changes in soil active organic carbon under different management types of bamboo stands[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(8):2603-2611.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]夏恩龙,吴志庄,梦梦.中国竹林认证的发展现状和趋势分析[J].竹子研究汇刊,2014,33(2):1-4.Xia Enlong,Wu Zhizhuang,Meng Meng.The development situation and trend of bamboo certification in China[J].Journal of Bamboo Research,2014,33(2):1-4.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]李永夫,姜培坤,刘娟,等.施肥对毛竹林土壤水溶性有机碳氮与温室气体排放的影响[J].林业科学,2010,46(12):165-170.Li Yongfu,Jiang Peikun,Liu Juan,et al.Effect of fertilization on water-soluble organic C,N,and emission of greenhouse gases in the soil of Phyllostachys edulis stands[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2010,46(12):165-170.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]乔锋,肖洋,赵淑苹.海林农场沼肥连年施用对玉米产量和土壤化学性质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(36):93-98.Qiao Feng,Xiao Yang,Zhao Shuping.Consecutive application of biogas manure affects maize production and soil chemical properties in Hailin farm[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2018,34(36):93-98.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Jia Y,Sun G X,Huang H,et al.Biogas slurry application elevated arsenic accumulation in rice plant through increased arsenic release and methylation in paddy soil[J].Plant&Soil,2013,365(1/2):387-396.
[12]Du Z J,Chen X M,Qi X B,et al.The effects of biochar and hoggery biogas slurry on fluvo-aquic soil physical and hydraulic properties:A field study of four consecutive wheat-maize rotations[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2016,16(8):2050-2058.
[13]Zheng X B,Fan J B,Cui J,et al.Effect of biogas slurry application on peanut yield,soil nutrients,carbon storage,and microbial activity in an Ultisol soil in southern China[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2016,16(2):449-460.
[14]郑学博,樊剑波,周静,等.沼液化肥配施对红壤旱地土壤养分和花生产量的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(3):675-684.Zheng Xuebo,Fan Jianbo,Zhou Jin,et al.Effects of combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer on soil nutrients and Peanut yield in upland red soil[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2016,53(3):675-684.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1978.
[16]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
[17]国家环境保护总局本书编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2002.
[18]周国模,姜培坤,徐秋芳.竹林生态系统中碳的固定与转化[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:78-79.
[19]李翀,周国模,施拥军,等.毛竹林老竹水平和经营措施对新竹发育质量的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(8):2243-2254.Li Chong,Zhou Guomo,Shi Yongjun,et al.Effects of old bamboo forests and relevant management measures on growth of new bamboo forests[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(8):2243-2254.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]郑学博,樊剑波,何园球,等.沼液化肥全氮配比对土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(19):142-150.Zheng Xuebo,Fan Jianbo,He Yuanqiu,et al.Effect of total nitrogen ratio of biogas slurry/chemical fertilizer on microflora and enzyme activities of soil[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE),2015,31(19):142-150.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]冯丹妮,伍钧,杨刚,等.连续定位施用沼液对水旱轮作耕层土壤微生物区系及酶活性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(8):1644-1651.Feng Danni,Wu Jun,Yang Gang,et al.Influence of long-term applications of biogas slurry onmicrobial community composition and enzymatic activities in surface soil under rice-rape rotation[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2014,33(8):1644-1651.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]郭振,王小利,徐虎,等.长期施用有机肥增加黄壤稻田土壤微生物量碳氮[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(5):1168-1174.Guo Zhen,Wang Xiaoli,Xu Hu,et al.A large number of long-term application of organic fertilizer can effectively increase microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in yellow paddy soil[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,2017,23(5):1168-1174.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]王娟娟,朱莎,靳士科,等.上海市3种森林类型土壤微生物生物量碳和氮的时空格局[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(4):615-621.Wang Juanjuan,Zhu Sha,Jin Shike,et al.Spatio-temporal distribution of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in three types of urban forest soils in Shanghai[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2016,32(4):615-621.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]张宝泉,李红红,马虎,等.渭北旱塬区不同年限苜蓿对土壤主要养分及微生物量的影响[J].草地学报,2015,23(6):1190-1196.Zhang Baoquan,Li Honghong,Ma Hu,et al.Effects of Medicago sativa on soil nutrients and microbial biomass under different years in the arid area of northern Weihe river basin[J].Acta Agrestia Sinica,2015,23(6):1190-1196.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]Behera N,Sahani U.Soil microbial biomass and activity in response to Eucalyptus plantation and natural regeneration on tropical soil[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2003,174(1):1-11.
[26]袁晶晶,同延安,卢绍辉,等.生物炭与氮肥配施对枣园土壤培肥效应的综合评价[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(1):134-140.Yuan Jingjing,Tong Yan’an,Lu Shaohui,et al.Comprehensive evaluation on soil fertility quality of jujube orchard under combined application of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE),2018,34(1):134-140.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]Kayikcioglu H H.Short-term effects of irrigation with treated domestic wastewater on microbiological activity of a Vertic xerofluvent soil under Mediterranean conditions[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2012,102:108-114.
[28]朱琳琳,张萌新,赵竑绯,等.不同经营措施对毛竹林生物量与碳储量的影响[J].经济林研究,2014,32(1):58-64.Zhu Linlin,Zhang Mengxin,Zhao Hongfei,et al.Effects of different management measures on biomass and carbon storage in Phyllostachys pubescens forest[J].Nonwood Forest Research,2014,32(1):58-64.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]杜满义,刘广路,范少辉,等.施肥对闽西毛竹生物量及碳储量分布格局的影响[J].热带作物学报,2015,36(5):872-877.Du Manyi,Liu Guanglu,Fan Shaohui,et al.Effects of fertilization on the distribution patterns of biomass and carbon storage in Moso bamboo forest,western Fujian province,China[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,2015,36(5):872-877.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]黄继川,徐培智,彭智平,等.基于稻田土壤肥力及生物学活性的沼液适宜用量研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(2):362-371.Huang Jichuan,Xu Peizhi,Peng Zhiping,et al.Biogas slurry use amount for suitable soil nutrition and biodiversity in paddy soil[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,2016,22(2):362-371.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Lan Q,Lewis S L,Sullivan M J P,et al.Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects[J].Nature Communications,2017,8(1):1-11.
[3]Wang Z,Li Y,Chang S X,et al.Contrasting effects of bamboo leaf and its biochar on soil CO2 efflux and labile organic carbon in an intensively managed Chinese chestnut plantation[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2014,50(7):1109-1119.
[4]Zhou G M,Jiang P K,Mo L F.Bamboo:A possible approach to the control of global warming[J].International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation,2009,10(4):547-550.
[5]张厚喜,庄舜尧,季海宝,等.我国南方毛竹林生态系统碳储量的估算[J].土壤,2014,46(3):413-418.Zhang Houxi,Zhuang Shunyao,Ji Haibao,et al.Estimating carbon storage of moso bamboo forest ecosystem in southern China[J].Soils,2014,46(3):413-418.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]刘恩斌,施拥军,李永夫,等.基于非空间结构的浙江省毛竹林固碳潜力[J].林业科学,2012,48(11):9-14.Liu Enbin,Shi Yongjun,Li Yongfu,et al.Carbon sequestration potential of Moso bamboo forest in Zhejiang province based on the non-spatial structure[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2012,48(11):9-14.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]马少杰,李正才,王斌,等.不同经营类型毛竹林土壤活性有机碳的差异[J].生态学报,2012,32(8):2603-2611.Ma Shaojie,Li Zhengcai,Wang Bin,et al.Changes in soil active organic carbon under different management types of bamboo stands[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(8):2603-2611.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]夏恩龙,吴志庄,梦梦.中国竹林认证的发展现状和趋势分析[J].竹子研究汇刊,2014,33(2):1-4.Xia Enlong,Wu Zhizhuang,Meng Meng.The development situation and trend of bamboo certification in China[J].Journal of Bamboo Research,2014,33(2):1-4.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]李永夫,姜培坤,刘娟,等.施肥对毛竹林土壤水溶性有机碳氮与温室气体排放的影响[J].林业科学,2010,46(12):165-170.Li Yongfu,Jiang Peikun,Liu Juan,et al.Effect of fertilization on water-soluble organic C,N,and emission of greenhouse gases in the soil of Phyllostachys edulis stands[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2010,46(12):165-170.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]乔锋,肖洋,赵淑苹.海林农场沼肥连年施用对玉米产量和土壤化学性质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(36):93-98.Qiao Feng,Xiao Yang,Zhao Shuping.Consecutive application of biogas manure affects maize production and soil chemical properties in Hailin farm[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2018,34(36):93-98.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Jia Y,Sun G X,Huang H,et al.Biogas slurry application elevated arsenic accumulation in rice plant through increased arsenic release and methylation in paddy soil[J].Plant&Soil,2013,365(1/2):387-396.
[12]Du Z J,Chen X M,Qi X B,et al.The effects of biochar and hoggery biogas slurry on fluvo-aquic soil physical and hydraulic properties:A field study of four consecutive wheat-maize rotations[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2016,16(8):2050-2058.
[13]Zheng X B,Fan J B,Cui J,et al.Effect of biogas slurry application on peanut yield,soil nutrients,carbon storage,and microbial activity in an Ultisol soil in southern China[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2016,16(2):449-460.
[14]郑学博,樊剑波,周静,等.沼液化肥配施对红壤旱地土壤养分和花生产量的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(3):675-684.Zheng Xuebo,Fan Jianbo,Zhou Jin,et al.Effects of combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer on soil nutrients and Peanut yield in upland red soil[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2016,53(3):675-684.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1978.
[16]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
[17]国家环境保护总局本书编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2002.
[18]周国模,姜培坤,徐秋芳.竹林生态系统中碳的固定与转化[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:78-79.
[19]李翀,周国模,施拥军,等.毛竹林老竹水平和经营措施对新竹发育质量的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(8):2243-2254.Li Chong,Zhou Guomo,Shi Yongjun,et al.Effects of old bamboo forests and relevant management measures on growth of new bamboo forests[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(8):2243-2254.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]郑学博,樊剑波,何园球,等.沼液化肥全氮配比对土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(19):142-150.Zheng Xuebo,Fan Jianbo,He Yuanqiu,et al.Effect of total nitrogen ratio of biogas slurry/chemical fertilizer on microflora and enzyme activities of soil[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE),2015,31(19):142-150.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]冯丹妮,伍钧,杨刚,等.连续定位施用沼液对水旱轮作耕层土壤微生物区系及酶活性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(8):1644-1651.Feng Danni,Wu Jun,Yang Gang,et al.Influence of long-term applications of biogas slurry onmicrobial community composition and enzymatic activities in surface soil under rice-rape rotation[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2014,33(8):1644-1651.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]郭振,王小利,徐虎,等.长期施用有机肥增加黄壤稻田土壤微生物量碳氮[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(5):1168-1174.Guo Zhen,Wang Xiaoli,Xu Hu,et al.A large number of long-term application of organic fertilizer can effectively increase microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in yellow paddy soil[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,2017,23(5):1168-1174.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]王娟娟,朱莎,靳士科,等.上海市3种森林类型土壤微生物生物量碳和氮的时空格局[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(4):615-621.Wang Juanjuan,Zhu Sha,Jin Shike,et al.Spatio-temporal distribution of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in three types of urban forest soils in Shanghai[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2016,32(4):615-621.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]张宝泉,李红红,马虎,等.渭北旱塬区不同年限苜蓿对土壤主要养分及微生物量的影响[J].草地学报,2015,23(6):1190-1196.Zhang Baoquan,Li Honghong,Ma Hu,et al.Effects of Medicago sativa on soil nutrients and microbial biomass under different years in the arid area of northern Weihe river basin[J].Acta Agrestia Sinica,2015,23(6):1190-1196.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]Behera N,Sahani U.Soil microbial biomass and activity in response to Eucalyptus plantation and natural regeneration on tropical soil[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2003,174(1):1-11.
[26]袁晶晶,同延安,卢绍辉,等.生物炭与氮肥配施对枣园土壤培肥效应的综合评价[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(1):134-140.Yuan Jingjing,Tong Yan’an,Lu Shaohui,et al.Comprehensive evaluation on soil fertility quality of jujube orchard under combined application of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE),2018,34(1):134-140.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]Kayikcioglu H H.Short-term effects of irrigation with treated domestic wastewater on microbiological activity of a Vertic xerofluvent soil under Mediterranean conditions[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2012,102:108-114.
[28]朱琳琳,张萌新,赵竑绯,等.不同经营措施对毛竹林生物量与碳储量的影响[J].经济林研究,2014,32(1):58-64.Zhu Linlin,Zhang Mengxin,Zhao Hongfei,et al.Effects of different management measures on biomass and carbon storage in Phyllostachys pubescens forest[J].Nonwood Forest Research,2014,32(1):58-64.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]杜满义,刘广路,范少辉,等.施肥对闽西毛竹生物量及碳储量分布格局的影响[J].热带作物学报,2015,36(5):872-877.Du Manyi,Liu Guanglu,Fan Shaohui,et al.Effects of fertilization on the distribution patterns of biomass and carbon storage in Moso bamboo forest,western Fujian province,China[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,2015,36(5):872-877.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]黄继川,徐培智,彭智平,等.基于稻田土壤肥力及生物学活性的沼液适宜用量研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(2):362-371.Huang Jichuan,Xu Peizhi,Peng Zhiping,et al.Biogas slurry use amount for suitable soil nutrition and biodiversity in paddy soil[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,2016,22(2):362-371.(in Chinese with English abstract)
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |