2018年国外图书馆学热点与前沿分析
|
摘要
[目的/意义]通过分析国外图书馆学的最新研究进展,以期为我国图书馆事业的发展提供参考。[方法/过程]从文献来源、文献主题、研究方法、研究热点和前沿等方面,系统梳理2018年国外Library Trends、Journal of Documentation和Library and Information Science Research三大专业期刊的论文。[结果/结论]分析显示,2018年国外图书馆学研究主要集中在7个主题,分别是信息分析与研究、信息行为、信息处理、信息计量、信息技术、图书馆管理和图书馆学基础研究。跨学科信息分析与研究、图书馆服务多样化成为国外图书馆学界的研究热点,具象信息和图书馆哲学成为国外学者研究的前沿领域,在一定程度上反映出国外图书馆学的最新趋势。
[Purpose/significance] By analyzing the latest research progress of library science abroad,this paper hopes to provide some references for the development of librarianship. [Method/process] This paper systematically reviews the papers published in three foreign professional journals: Library Trends,Journal of Documentation, Library and Information Science Research in 2018 from the aspects of research sources, themes, methods, hotspots, frontiers and so on. [Result/conclusion] According to the analysis,foreign library science research in 2018 mainly focused on the following seven topics: information analysis and research, information behavior, information processing, informetrics, information technology, library management and basic research of library science. Among them, interdisciplinary information analysis and research, and diversification of library services became hotspots in foreign library science research; while embodiment information and library philosophy became the frontiers, which to some extent reflected the trends of foreign library science research in the past year.
[Purpose/significance] By analyzing the latest research progress of library science abroad,this paper hopes to provide some references for the development of librarianship. [Method/process] This paper systematically reviews the papers published in three foreign professional journals: Library Trends,Journal of Documentation, Library and Information Science Research in 2018 from the aspects of research sources, themes, methods, hotspots, frontiers and so on. [Result/conclusion] According to the analysis,foreign library science research in 2018 mainly focused on the following seven topics: information analysis and research, information behavior, information processing, informetrics, information technology, library management and basic research of library science. Among them, interdisciplinary information analysis and research, and diversification of library services became hotspots in foreign library science research; while embodiment information and library philosophy became the frontiers, which to some extent reflected the trends of foreign library science research in the past year.
引文
[1]格洛莉亚·佩雷斯-萨尔梅隆,许桂菊,徐路.图书馆:社会变革的驱动器[J].图书馆杂志,2018,37(11):4-10.
[2]柯平,李健,刘亚,宋志强,谢海先. 2009年国外图书馆学研究前沿与热点分析——南开大学图书馆学前沿研究讨论之二[J].图书馆学研究,2010(10):2-9+13.
[3]柯平,贾东琴,李廷翰. 2010年国外图书馆学情报学研究热点分析[J].情报科学,2011,29(09):1281-1288+1293.
[4]柯平,何颖芳,闫娜. 2011-2012年国外图书馆学研究前沿与热点分析[J].情报科学,2013,31(06):3-9.
[5]柯平,陈信,宋家梅,亢奇. 2013年国外图书馆学研究前沿与热点分析[J].图书情报知识,2014(05):17-29.
[6]柯平,邹金汇.2014-2015年国外图书馆学研究前沿之一——《IFLA Journal》综述分析[J].图书馆理论与实践,2016(11):1-8.
[7]柯平,刘怡君,刘旭青,吴颖颖.2016-2017年国外图书馆学前沿与热点分析[J].图书馆工作与研究,2018(11):5-14.
[8]CHEN C F, LIQ, DENG Z Q, et al. The preferences of Chinese LIS journal articles in citing works outside the discipline[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):99-118.
[9]WANG X G, SONG N Y,ZHANG L,et al. Understanding subjects contained in Dunhuang mural images for deep semantic annotation[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(2):333-353.
[10]YU B Y, ANA N,LORRI M.MON,et al. E-inclusion or digital divide:An integrated model of digital inequality[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):552-574.
[11]WANG L.Twinning data science with information science in schools of library and information science[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):1243-1257.
[12]NATALIE G T.Youth information-seeking behavior and online government information:Tweens’ perceptions of US federal government websites[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):509-525.
[13]MELISSA G. OCEPEK.Bringing out the everyday in everyday information behavior[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(2):398-411.
[14]KONSTANTINA M,SIMON B.Exploring the everyday life information needs and the socio-cultural adaptation barriers of Syrian refugees in Scotland[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):1104-1132.
[15]DALI K.The lifeways we avoid:The role of information avoidance in discrimination against people with disabilities[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1258-1273.
[16]HUSSAIN A,DIANE R P.“Why not use it more?” Sources of self-efficacy in researchers’ use of social media for knowledge sharing[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(6):1274-1292.
[17]PIYAPAT J,ANDREW C, JO B.Community participation in the management of palm leaf manuscripts as Lanna cultural material in Thailand[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(5):951-965.
[18]YOO S,PARK J H.Hybrid gatekeeping framework for value-added information services[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):61-72.
[19]LEE H,PANG N.Understanding the effects of task and topical knowledge in the evaluation of websites as information patch[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):162-186.
[20]WELLA K, WEBBER S. Embodying HIV and AIDS Information:Experiences of Serodiscordant Couples[J].Library Trends,2018,66(4):442-465.
[21]ANTON V D V,ZUCCON G,KOOPMAN B,et al.A task completion framework to support single-interaction IR research[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(2):289-308.
[22]张雪梅.我国图书馆学研究的主题分类表构建及主题分布规律研究[D].吉林大学,2018:69-71.
[23]王芳,陈锋,祝娜,杨京.我国情报学理论的来源、应用及学科专属度研究[J].情报学报,2016(11):1150.
[24]POHJANNORO U,ROUSI A M.The modes of music information in a compositional process:A case study[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):987-1007.
[25]ROUSI A M,SAVOLAINEN R,HARVIAINEN M,et al.Situational relevance of music information modes:An empirical investigation among doctor of music students[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):1008-1024.
[26]LEE D,ROBINSON L.The heart of music classification:Toward a model of classifying musical medium[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(2):258-277.
[27]WALLER H J,WALLER D S.Opera costumes and the value of object biographies[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(6):1162-1174.
[28]BERRYMAN J.Art as document:On conceptual art and documentation[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(6):1149-1161.
[29]SUNDBERG K,KJELLMAN U.The tattoo as a document[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):18-35.
[30]HAJIBAYOVA L.Leveraging collective intelligence:From univocal to multivocal representation of cultural heritage[J]Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1190-1203.
[31]MIHALACHE I D.Tuna noodle casserole is tasty?The information network of recipes[J].Library Trends,2018,66(4):466-486.
[32]FOSTER M J.Navigating library collections,black culture,and current events[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):8-22.
[33]SHANKAR S, O'BRIEN H L, ABSAR R. Rhythms of everyday life in mobile information seeking:Reflections on a photo-diary study[J]. Library Trends, 2018, 66(4):535-567.
[34]HOWARD M, BUSSELL H. Habituated:A merleau-pontian analysis of the smartphone[J].Library trends,2018,66(3):267-288.
[35]CHO H,SCHMALZ M L, KEATING S A,et al.Analyzing anime users’online forum queries for recommendation using content analysis"Situational relevance of music information modes[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):918-935.
[36]ANITA N,KATRIINA B.Transitions in workplace information practices and culture:The influence of newcomers on information use in healthcare[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):827-843.
[37]LINDH K.The construction of lay rescuers in bystander CPR classes[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):315-328.
[38]BETH S J,GAGAN J,KATHERINE C.“You Have to Know Your Body!”:The role of the body in influencing the information behaviors of people with type 2 diabetes[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):289-314.
[39]ANN H,PAROMITA B.Searching for the “sacred cow”:A conceptual analysis of the term in nursing literature[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1134-1148.
[40]SPITERI L,PECOSKIE J.Expanding the scope of affect:Taxonomy construction for emotions,tones,and associations[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(2):383-397.
[41]O’BRIEN H,GREYSON D,CHABOT J S C.Young parents’ personal and social information contexts for child feeding practices:An ethnographic study in British Columbia,Canada[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):608-623.
[42]ALSTAD K,HERTZUM M.Information seeking by geoscientists:An update on Bichteler and Ward(1989)[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(2):447-460.
[43]CHRISTIAN O S.Using electronic information resources to solve cultural translation problems:Differences between students and professional translators[J]Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1293-1317.
[44]ALBASSAM S A A,RUTHVEN I.Users’ relevance criteria for video in leisure contexts[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):62-79.
[45]CHARDONNENS A,RIZZA E,COECKELBERGS M,et al.Mining user queries with information extraction methods and linked data[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):936-950.
[46]SPEZI V,WAKELING S,PINFIELD S,et al.“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundnessonly peer review in open-access mega-journals[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):137-161.
[47]GUDINAVI?IUS A,?UMINAS A.Choosing a book by its cover:Analysis of a reader’s choice[J].Journal of Doc umentation,2018,74(2):430-446.
[48]BRUHN C, SYN S Y. Pragmatic thought as a philosophical foundation for collaborative tagging and the Semantic Web[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(3):575-587.
[49]WILSON T D. Human information behavior[J].Informing Science,2000,3(2):49-55.
[50]LIU J J,HASSAN Z,YUAN L,et al.Search systems and their features:What college students use to find and save information[J].Library and Information Science Research, 2018,40(2):118-124.
[51]CLICK A B. International graduate students in the United States:Research processes and challenges[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):153-162.
[52]DUBNJAKOVIC A. Antecedents and consequences of autonomous information seeking motivation[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):9-17.
[53]MADDEN A D,WEBBER S,FORD N,et al.The relationship between students’ subject preferences and their information behaviour[J].Journal of Documentation,2018, 74(2):398-411.
[54]EVERHART N, ESCOBAR K L. Conceptualizing the information seeking of college students on the autism spectrum through participant viewpoint ethnography[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):269-276.
[55]TAYLOR N G. Youth information-seeking behavior and online government Information Tweens’ perceptions of US federal government websites[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(3):509-525.
[56]HAN H. Children’s help-seeking behaviors and effects of domain knowledge in using Google and Kids.gov:Query formulation and results evaluation stages[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):208-218.
[57]ROTHBAUER P, DALMER N K. Reading as a lifeline among aging readers:Findings from a qualitative interview study with older adults[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):165-172.
[58]MAHINDARATHNE M.G.P.P,MIN Q.Developing a model to explore the information seeking behaviour of farmers[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):781-803.
[59]BADIA G.Identifying “best bets” for searching in chemical engineering comparing database content and performance for information retrieval[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(1):80-98.
[60]HARVIAINEN J T,RAPP A. Multiplayer online role-playing as information retrieval and system use:an ethnographic study[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):624-640.
[61]RYAN B. A model to explain information seeking behavior by individuals in the response phase of a disaster[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):73-85.
[62]MARCELLA R. The use of self moderated focus groups to gather exploratory data on information beliefs and their impact on information seeking behavior[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):45-52.
[63]KEILTY P,LEAZER G.Feeling documents:toward a phenomenology of information seeking[J].Journal of Docu mentation,2018,74(3):462-489.
[64]OCEPEK M G.Sensible shopping:a sensory exploration of the information environment of the grocery store[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):371-394.
[65]GORICHANAZ T. Understanding and information constellations in ultrarunning[J]. Library Trends,2018,66(3):329-350.
[66]NOLIN J M.Defining transparency movements[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(5):1025-1041.
[67]GRAMINIUS C,HAIDER J.Air pollution online:everyday environmental information on the social media site Sina Weibo[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(4):722-740.
[68]HOOD C, REID P.Social media as a vehicle for user engagement with local history:A case study in the North East of Scotland[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):741-762.
[69]ZENK-M?LTGEN W, AKDENIZ E, KATSANIDOU A,et al. Factors influencing the data sharing behavior of researchers in sociology and political science[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(5):1053-1073.
[70]ALSHAHRANI H,PENNINGTON D R.“Why not use it more?” Sources of self-efficacy in researchers’ use of social media for knowledge sharing[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(6):1274-1292.
[71]GREIFENEDER E, PONTIS S, BLANDFORD A,et al. Researchers’ attitudes towards the use of social networking sites[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):119-136.
[72]BAKERMANS M H, PLOTKE R Z. Assessing information literacy instruction in interdisciplinary first year project-based courses with STEM students[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):98-105.
[73]FLIERL M, BONEM E, MAYBEE C, et al. Information literacy supporting student motivation and performance:Course-level analyses[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):30-37.
[74]CHU S K W,HUANG H,WONG W N M,et al.Quality and clarity of health information on Q&A sites[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018, 40(3-4):237-244.
[75]HICKS A.Developing the methodological toolbox for information literacy research:Grounded theory and visual research methods[J].Library and Information Science Research, 2018,40(3-4):194-200.
[76]GROSS M, LATHAM D, JULIEN H. What the framework means to me:Attitudes of academic librarians toward the ACRL framework for information literacy for higher education[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):262-268.
[77]HUVILA I, AHMAD F. Holistic information behavior and the perceived success of work in organizations[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):18-29.
[78]LOPATOVSKA I,CARCAMO T,NICHOLAS D.et al.Not just a pretty picture part two:testing a visual literacy program for young childrens[J].Journal of Documentation,2018, 74(2):588-607.
[79]BARRIAGE S.Task-centered activities as an approach to data collection in research with children and youth[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):1-8.
[80]POTNIS D, DEOSTHALI K, ZHU X H, et al. Factors influencing undergraduate use of e-books:A mixed methods study[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018, 40(2):106-117.
[81]MISILEI J, LIEW C L. Perceived value of digital components in library programmes:The case of Auckland libraries’ dare to explore summer reading programme[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):219-236.
[82]YOO S, PARK J H.Hybrid gatekeeping framework for value-added information services[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):61-72.
[83]PERRIER L, BLONDAL E, MACDONALD H. Exploring the experiences of academic libraries with research data management:A meta-ethnographic analysis of qualitative studies[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):173-183.
[84]HEDEMARK?, LINDBERG J. Babies, bodies, and books—librarians’ work for early literacy[J].Library Trends,2018,66(4):422-441.
[85]GUZIK E. Information sharing as embodied practice in a context of conversion to Islam[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):351-370.
[86]BATES J.The politics of data friction[J]Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(1):412-429.
[87]HIGGINS S.Digital curation:the development of a discipline within information science[J].Journal of Documen tation,2018,74(6):1318-1338.
[88]BURKE M.Making choices:developing digital research frameworks for information management[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):247-254.
[89]HOWARD S A, KNOWLTON S A.Browsing through bias:the library of congress classification and subject headings for African American studies and LGBTQIA studies[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):74-88.
[90]MARON D, FEINBERG M.What does it mean to adopt a metadata standard?A case study of Omeka and the Dublin Core[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):674-691.
[91]LI C Q,SUGIMOTO S.Provenance description of metadata application profiles for long-term maintenance of metadata schemas[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):36-61.
[92]GORICHANAZ T,LATHAM K F,WOOD E.Life world as “unit of analysis”[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(4):880-893.
[93]GRAC K F.Enriching and enhancing moving images with linked data[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(2):354-371.
[94]WICKETT K.A logic-based framework for collection item metadata relationships[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(6):1175-1189.
[95]PARK E G,BURR G, SLONOSKY V,et al.Data rescue archive weather:Preserving the complexity of historical climate data[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):763-780.
[96]STOBO V,PATTERSON K,ERICKSON K,et al.“I should like you to see them some time”:An empirical study of copyright clearance costs in the digitisation of Edwin Morgan’s scrapbooks[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):641-667.
[97]ULLAH A, AMEEN K. Account of methodologies and methods applied in LIS research:A systematic review[J].Library and Information Science Research, 2018,40(1):53-60.
[98]JAMALI H R. Does research using qualitative methods(grounded theory, ethnography, and phenomenology)have more impact?[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):201-207.
[99]CRAIG F S, NI C Q, SUGIMOTO C. Different mysteries, different lore:An examination of inherited referencing behaviors in academic mentoring[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):277-284.
[100]CHANG Y W. Exploring the interdisciplinary characteristics of library and information science(LIS)from the perspective of interdisciplinary LIS authors[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):125-134.
[101]LUO J B.Habitual wayfinding in academic libraries:Evidence from a liberal arts college[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):285-295.
[102]MANDEL L H, LEMEUR K A. User wayfinding strategies in public library facilities[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):38-43.
[103]KOUZARI E, STAMELOS I. Process mining applied on library information systems:A case study[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):245-254.
[104]LUEG C,TWIDALE M.Designing for humans,not robots(or vulcans)[J].Library Trends,2018,66(4):409-421.
[105]TUMMON N, MCKINNON D. Attitudes and practices of Canadian academic librarians regarding library and online privacy:A national study[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):86-97.
[106]POOLE A H,GARWOOD D A.“Natural allies” librarians, archivists, and big data in international digital humanities project work[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(4):804-826.
[107]HALL H, CRUICKSHANK P,RYAN B.Long-term community development within a researcher network:A social network analysis of the DREaM project cadre[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):844-861.
[108]WICKHAM M E, SWEENEY M E. Are we still transmitting whiteness? A case study of a southern, rural library’s youth collections[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):89-106.
[109]WILLIAMS R N.Future strategic considerations and development priorities for national museum libraries[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1190-1203.
[110]LARSEN H.Archives, libraries and museums in the Nordic model of the public sphere[J].Journal of Documen tation,2018,74(1):187-194.
[111]LIU L G, GEE H, TERNG C. Exploring the determinants of scholarly book prices in the fields of science,technology, and medicine[J]. Library Trends. 2018,67(2):255-285.
[112]SZETO K. The roles of academic libraries in shaping music publishing in the digital age[J]. Library Trends.2018,67(2):303-318.
[113]LI Y, LIPPINCOTT S K,HARE S,et al. The library-press partnership:Anoverview and two case studies[J].Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):319-334.
[114]SCHLOSSER M. Building capacity for academy-owned publishing through the library publishing coalition[J].Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):359-375.
[115]KRISTOF C.The development of resource sharing, scholarly communication, and the role of publishers in the context of academic libraries[J].Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):394-414.
[116]BURTLE L,BURRIGHT M. Academic libraries as unlikely defendants:Acomparative fair use analysis of the georgia state university e-reserves and hathitrust cases[J].Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):376-393.
[117]HOLLEY R P.Open access:Current overview and future prospects[J]. Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):214-240.
[118]XIA J.Applying rational choice theory to authors'behaviors in unethical publishing in China[J].Library Trends, 2018,67(2):241-254.
[119]BAWDEN D,ROBINSON L.Curating the infosphere:Luciano Floridi’s Philosophy of Information as the foundation for library and information science[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,73(5):2-17.
[120]S?E S O.Algorithmic detection of misinformation and disinformation:Gricean perspectives[J].Journal of Docu mentation,2018,74(2):309-332.
[121]DAY R E.Documents from head to toe:Bodies of knowledge in the works of Paul Otlet and Georges Bataille[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):395-408.
[122]BATES M J.Concepts for the study of information embodiment[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):239-266.
[123]COX A M.Embodied knowledge and sensory information:Theoretical roots and inspirations[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):223-238.
[124]ARROYO-RAMIREZ E,CHOU R L,FREEDMAN J,et al.The reach of a long-arm stapler:Calling in microaggressions in the LIS field through zine work[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):107-130.
[125]ESPINAL I,SUTHERLAND T, ROH C.A holistic approach for inclusive librarianship:decentering whiteness in our profession[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):147-162.
[126]ALABI J.From hostile to inclusive:Strategies for improving the racial climate of academic libraries[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):131-146.
[127]BROWN J, FERRETTI J A., LEUNG S,et al.We here:Speaking our truth[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):163-181.
[128]WHEELER M B, SMITH D. Race and leadership in library and information science education:A study of African American administrators[J].Library Trends, 2018,67(1):23-38.
[129]COLLINS A M.Language, power,and oppression in the LIS diversity void[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):39-51.
[130]CLARKE R I. How we done it good:Research through design as a legitimate methodology for librarianship[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018, 40(3-4):255-261.
[131]WIDDERSHEIM M M. Historical case study:A research strategy for diachronic analysis[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):144-152.
[132]NOLIN J M, AXELSSON A-S,DORACIC A,et al.Response to cult of the “I”[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(3):668-671.
[133]ADLER M, HARPER L M. Race and Ethnicity in classification systems:Teaching knowledge organization from a social justice perspective[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):52-73.
[134]马海群.2016-2018年我国图书馆学学术热点及发展趋势[J].图书馆理论与实践,2017(12):1-4+28.
[2]柯平,李健,刘亚,宋志强,谢海先. 2009年国外图书馆学研究前沿与热点分析——南开大学图书馆学前沿研究讨论之二[J].图书馆学研究,2010(10):2-9+13.
[3]柯平,贾东琴,李廷翰. 2010年国外图书馆学情报学研究热点分析[J].情报科学,2011,29(09):1281-1288+1293.
[4]柯平,何颖芳,闫娜. 2011-2012年国外图书馆学研究前沿与热点分析[J].情报科学,2013,31(06):3-9.
[5]柯平,陈信,宋家梅,亢奇. 2013年国外图书馆学研究前沿与热点分析[J].图书情报知识,2014(05):17-29.
[6]柯平,邹金汇.2014-2015年国外图书馆学研究前沿之一——《IFLA Journal》综述分析[J].图书馆理论与实践,2016(11):1-8.
[7]柯平,刘怡君,刘旭青,吴颖颖.2016-2017年国外图书馆学前沿与热点分析[J].图书馆工作与研究,2018(11):5-14.
[8]CHEN C F, LIQ, DENG Z Q, et al. The preferences of Chinese LIS journal articles in citing works outside the discipline[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):99-118.
[9]WANG X G, SONG N Y,ZHANG L,et al. Understanding subjects contained in Dunhuang mural images for deep semantic annotation[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(2):333-353.
[10]YU B Y, ANA N,LORRI M.MON,et al. E-inclusion or digital divide:An integrated model of digital inequality[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):552-574.
[11]WANG L.Twinning data science with information science in schools of library and information science[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):1243-1257.
[12]NATALIE G T.Youth information-seeking behavior and online government information:Tweens’ perceptions of US federal government websites[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):509-525.
[13]MELISSA G. OCEPEK.Bringing out the everyday in everyday information behavior[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(2):398-411.
[14]KONSTANTINA M,SIMON B.Exploring the everyday life information needs and the socio-cultural adaptation barriers of Syrian refugees in Scotland[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):1104-1132.
[15]DALI K.The lifeways we avoid:The role of information avoidance in discrimination against people with disabilities[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1258-1273.
[16]HUSSAIN A,DIANE R P.“Why not use it more?” Sources of self-efficacy in researchers’ use of social media for knowledge sharing[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(6):1274-1292.
[17]PIYAPAT J,ANDREW C, JO B.Community participation in the management of palm leaf manuscripts as Lanna cultural material in Thailand[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(5):951-965.
[18]YOO S,PARK J H.Hybrid gatekeeping framework for value-added information services[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):61-72.
[19]LEE H,PANG N.Understanding the effects of task and topical knowledge in the evaluation of websites as information patch[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):162-186.
[20]WELLA K, WEBBER S. Embodying HIV and AIDS Information:Experiences of Serodiscordant Couples[J].Library Trends,2018,66(4):442-465.
[21]ANTON V D V,ZUCCON G,KOOPMAN B,et al.A task completion framework to support single-interaction IR research[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(2):289-308.
[22]张雪梅.我国图书馆学研究的主题分类表构建及主题分布规律研究[D].吉林大学,2018:69-71.
[23]王芳,陈锋,祝娜,杨京.我国情报学理论的来源、应用及学科专属度研究[J].情报学报,2016(11):1150.
[24]POHJANNORO U,ROUSI A M.The modes of music information in a compositional process:A case study[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):987-1007.
[25]ROUSI A M,SAVOLAINEN R,HARVIAINEN M,et al.Situational relevance of music information modes:An empirical investigation among doctor of music students[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):1008-1024.
[26]LEE D,ROBINSON L.The heart of music classification:Toward a model of classifying musical medium[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(2):258-277.
[27]WALLER H J,WALLER D S.Opera costumes and the value of object biographies[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(6):1162-1174.
[28]BERRYMAN J.Art as document:On conceptual art and documentation[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(6):1149-1161.
[29]SUNDBERG K,KJELLMAN U.The tattoo as a document[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):18-35.
[30]HAJIBAYOVA L.Leveraging collective intelligence:From univocal to multivocal representation of cultural heritage[J]Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1190-1203.
[31]MIHALACHE I D.Tuna noodle casserole is tasty?The information network of recipes[J].Library Trends,2018,66(4):466-486.
[32]FOSTER M J.Navigating library collections,black culture,and current events[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):8-22.
[33]SHANKAR S, O'BRIEN H L, ABSAR R. Rhythms of everyday life in mobile information seeking:Reflections on a photo-diary study[J]. Library Trends, 2018, 66(4):535-567.
[34]HOWARD M, BUSSELL H. Habituated:A merleau-pontian analysis of the smartphone[J].Library trends,2018,66(3):267-288.
[35]CHO H,SCHMALZ M L, KEATING S A,et al.Analyzing anime users’online forum queries for recommendation using content analysis"Situational relevance of music information modes[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):918-935.
[36]ANITA N,KATRIINA B.Transitions in workplace information practices and culture:The influence of newcomers on information use in healthcare[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):827-843.
[37]LINDH K.The construction of lay rescuers in bystander CPR classes[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):315-328.
[38]BETH S J,GAGAN J,KATHERINE C.“You Have to Know Your Body!”:The role of the body in influencing the information behaviors of people with type 2 diabetes[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):289-314.
[39]ANN H,PAROMITA B.Searching for the “sacred cow”:A conceptual analysis of the term in nursing literature[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1134-1148.
[40]SPITERI L,PECOSKIE J.Expanding the scope of affect:Taxonomy construction for emotions,tones,and associations[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(2):383-397.
[41]O’BRIEN H,GREYSON D,CHABOT J S C.Young parents’ personal and social information contexts for child feeding practices:An ethnographic study in British Columbia,Canada[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):608-623.
[42]ALSTAD K,HERTZUM M.Information seeking by geoscientists:An update on Bichteler and Ward(1989)[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(2):447-460.
[43]CHRISTIAN O S.Using electronic information resources to solve cultural translation problems:Differences between students and professional translators[J]Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1293-1317.
[44]ALBASSAM S A A,RUTHVEN I.Users’ relevance criteria for video in leisure contexts[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):62-79.
[45]CHARDONNENS A,RIZZA E,COECKELBERGS M,et al.Mining user queries with information extraction methods and linked data[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(5):936-950.
[46]SPEZI V,WAKELING S,PINFIELD S,et al.“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundnessonly peer review in open-access mega-journals[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):137-161.
[47]GUDINAVI?IUS A,?UMINAS A.Choosing a book by its cover:Analysis of a reader’s choice[J].Journal of Doc umentation,2018,74(2):430-446.
[48]BRUHN C, SYN S Y. Pragmatic thought as a philosophical foundation for collaborative tagging and the Semantic Web[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(3):575-587.
[49]WILSON T D. Human information behavior[J].Informing Science,2000,3(2):49-55.
[50]LIU J J,HASSAN Z,YUAN L,et al.Search systems and their features:What college students use to find and save information[J].Library and Information Science Research, 2018,40(2):118-124.
[51]CLICK A B. International graduate students in the United States:Research processes and challenges[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):153-162.
[52]DUBNJAKOVIC A. Antecedents and consequences of autonomous information seeking motivation[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):9-17.
[53]MADDEN A D,WEBBER S,FORD N,et al.The relationship between students’ subject preferences and their information behaviour[J].Journal of Documentation,2018, 74(2):398-411.
[54]EVERHART N, ESCOBAR K L. Conceptualizing the information seeking of college students on the autism spectrum through participant viewpoint ethnography[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):269-276.
[55]TAYLOR N G. Youth information-seeking behavior and online government Information Tweens’ perceptions of US federal government websites[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(3):509-525.
[56]HAN H. Children’s help-seeking behaviors and effects of domain knowledge in using Google and Kids.gov:Query formulation and results evaluation stages[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):208-218.
[57]ROTHBAUER P, DALMER N K. Reading as a lifeline among aging readers:Findings from a qualitative interview study with older adults[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):165-172.
[58]MAHINDARATHNE M.G.P.P,MIN Q.Developing a model to explore the information seeking behaviour of farmers[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):781-803.
[59]BADIA G.Identifying “best bets” for searching in chemical engineering comparing database content and performance for information retrieval[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(1):80-98.
[60]HARVIAINEN J T,RAPP A. Multiplayer online role-playing as information retrieval and system use:an ethnographic study[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):624-640.
[61]RYAN B. A model to explain information seeking behavior by individuals in the response phase of a disaster[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):73-85.
[62]MARCELLA R. The use of self moderated focus groups to gather exploratory data on information beliefs and their impact on information seeking behavior[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):45-52.
[63]KEILTY P,LEAZER G.Feeling documents:toward a phenomenology of information seeking[J].Journal of Docu mentation,2018,74(3):462-489.
[64]OCEPEK M G.Sensible shopping:a sensory exploration of the information environment of the grocery store[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):371-394.
[65]GORICHANAZ T. Understanding and information constellations in ultrarunning[J]. Library Trends,2018,66(3):329-350.
[66]NOLIN J M.Defining transparency movements[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(5):1025-1041.
[67]GRAMINIUS C,HAIDER J.Air pollution online:everyday environmental information on the social media site Sina Weibo[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(4):722-740.
[68]HOOD C, REID P.Social media as a vehicle for user engagement with local history:A case study in the North East of Scotland[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):741-762.
[69]ZENK-M?LTGEN W, AKDENIZ E, KATSANIDOU A,et al. Factors influencing the data sharing behavior of researchers in sociology and political science[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(5):1053-1073.
[70]ALSHAHRANI H,PENNINGTON D R.“Why not use it more?” Sources of self-efficacy in researchers’ use of social media for knowledge sharing[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018,74(6):1274-1292.
[71]GREIFENEDER E, PONTIS S, BLANDFORD A,et al. Researchers’ attitudes towards the use of social networking sites[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):119-136.
[72]BAKERMANS M H, PLOTKE R Z. Assessing information literacy instruction in interdisciplinary first year project-based courses with STEM students[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):98-105.
[73]FLIERL M, BONEM E, MAYBEE C, et al. Information literacy supporting student motivation and performance:Course-level analyses[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):30-37.
[74]CHU S K W,HUANG H,WONG W N M,et al.Quality and clarity of health information on Q&A sites[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018, 40(3-4):237-244.
[75]HICKS A.Developing the methodological toolbox for information literacy research:Grounded theory and visual research methods[J].Library and Information Science Research, 2018,40(3-4):194-200.
[76]GROSS M, LATHAM D, JULIEN H. What the framework means to me:Attitudes of academic librarians toward the ACRL framework for information literacy for higher education[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):262-268.
[77]HUVILA I, AHMAD F. Holistic information behavior and the perceived success of work in organizations[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):18-29.
[78]LOPATOVSKA I,CARCAMO T,NICHOLAS D.et al.Not just a pretty picture part two:testing a visual literacy program for young childrens[J].Journal of Documentation,2018, 74(2):588-607.
[79]BARRIAGE S.Task-centered activities as an approach to data collection in research with children and youth[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):1-8.
[80]POTNIS D, DEOSTHALI K, ZHU X H, et al. Factors influencing undergraduate use of e-books:A mixed methods study[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018, 40(2):106-117.
[81]MISILEI J, LIEW C L. Perceived value of digital components in library programmes:The case of Auckland libraries’ dare to explore summer reading programme[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):219-236.
[82]YOO S, PARK J H.Hybrid gatekeeping framework for value-added information services[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):61-72.
[83]PERRIER L, BLONDAL E, MACDONALD H. Exploring the experiences of academic libraries with research data management:A meta-ethnographic analysis of qualitative studies[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):173-183.
[84]HEDEMARK?, LINDBERG J. Babies, bodies, and books—librarians’ work for early literacy[J].Library Trends,2018,66(4):422-441.
[85]GUZIK E. Information sharing as embodied practice in a context of conversion to Islam[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):351-370.
[86]BATES J.The politics of data friction[J]Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(1):412-429.
[87]HIGGINS S.Digital curation:the development of a discipline within information science[J].Journal of Documen tation,2018,74(6):1318-1338.
[88]BURKE M.Making choices:developing digital research frameworks for information management[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):247-254.
[89]HOWARD S A, KNOWLTON S A.Browsing through bias:the library of congress classification and subject headings for African American studies and LGBTQIA studies[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):74-88.
[90]MARON D, FEINBERG M.What does it mean to adopt a metadata standard?A case study of Omeka and the Dublin Core[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):674-691.
[91]LI C Q,SUGIMOTO S.Provenance description of metadata application profiles for long-term maintenance of metadata schemas[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(1):36-61.
[92]GORICHANAZ T,LATHAM K F,WOOD E.Life world as “unit of analysis”[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(4):880-893.
[93]GRAC K F.Enriching and enhancing moving images with linked data[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(2):354-371.
[94]WICKETT K.A logic-based framework for collection item metadata relationships[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(6):1175-1189.
[95]PARK E G,BURR G, SLONOSKY V,et al.Data rescue archive weather:Preserving the complexity of historical climate data[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):763-780.
[96]STOBO V,PATTERSON K,ERICKSON K,et al.“I should like you to see them some time”:An empirical study of copyright clearance costs in the digitisation of Edwin Morgan’s scrapbooks[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(3):641-667.
[97]ULLAH A, AMEEN K. Account of methodologies and methods applied in LIS research:A systematic review[J].Library and Information Science Research, 2018,40(1):53-60.
[98]JAMALI H R. Does research using qualitative methods(grounded theory, ethnography, and phenomenology)have more impact?[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):201-207.
[99]CRAIG F S, NI C Q, SUGIMOTO C. Different mysteries, different lore:An examination of inherited referencing behaviors in academic mentoring[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):277-284.
[100]CHANG Y W. Exploring the interdisciplinary characteristics of library and information science(LIS)from the perspective of interdisciplinary LIS authors[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):125-134.
[101]LUO J B.Habitual wayfinding in academic libraries:Evidence from a liberal arts college[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):285-295.
[102]MANDEL L H, LEMEUR K A. User wayfinding strategies in public library facilities[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(1):38-43.
[103]KOUZARI E, STAMELOS I. Process mining applied on library information systems:A case study[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(3-4):245-254.
[104]LUEG C,TWIDALE M.Designing for humans,not robots(or vulcans)[J].Library Trends,2018,66(4):409-421.
[105]TUMMON N, MCKINNON D. Attitudes and practices of Canadian academic librarians regarding library and online privacy:A national study[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):86-97.
[106]POOLE A H,GARWOOD D A.“Natural allies” librarians, archivists, and big data in international digital humanities project work[J].Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(4):804-826.
[107]HALL H, CRUICKSHANK P,RYAN B.Long-term community development within a researcher network:A social network analysis of the DREaM project cadre[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(4):844-861.
[108]WICKHAM M E, SWEENEY M E. Are we still transmitting whiteness? A case study of a southern, rural library’s youth collections[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):89-106.
[109]WILLIAMS R N.Future strategic considerations and development priorities for national museum libraries[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,74(6):1190-1203.
[110]LARSEN H.Archives, libraries and museums in the Nordic model of the public sphere[J].Journal of Documen tation,2018,74(1):187-194.
[111]LIU L G, GEE H, TERNG C. Exploring the determinants of scholarly book prices in the fields of science,technology, and medicine[J]. Library Trends. 2018,67(2):255-285.
[112]SZETO K. The roles of academic libraries in shaping music publishing in the digital age[J]. Library Trends.2018,67(2):303-318.
[113]LI Y, LIPPINCOTT S K,HARE S,et al. The library-press partnership:Anoverview and two case studies[J].Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):319-334.
[114]SCHLOSSER M. Building capacity for academy-owned publishing through the library publishing coalition[J].Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):359-375.
[115]KRISTOF C.The development of resource sharing, scholarly communication, and the role of publishers in the context of academic libraries[J].Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):394-414.
[116]BURTLE L,BURRIGHT M. Academic libraries as unlikely defendants:Acomparative fair use analysis of the georgia state university e-reserves and hathitrust cases[J].Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):376-393.
[117]HOLLEY R P.Open access:Current overview and future prospects[J]. Library Trends, 2018, 67(2):214-240.
[118]XIA J.Applying rational choice theory to authors'behaviors in unethical publishing in China[J].Library Trends, 2018,67(2):241-254.
[119]BAWDEN D,ROBINSON L.Curating the infosphere:Luciano Floridi’s Philosophy of Information as the foundation for library and information science[J].Journal of Documentation,2018,73(5):2-17.
[120]S?E S O.Algorithmic detection of misinformation and disinformation:Gricean perspectives[J].Journal of Docu mentation,2018,74(2):309-332.
[121]DAY R E.Documents from head to toe:Bodies of knowledge in the works of Paul Otlet and Georges Bataille[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):395-408.
[122]BATES M J.Concepts for the study of information embodiment[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):239-266.
[123]COX A M.Embodied knowledge and sensory information:Theoretical roots and inspirations[J].Library Trends,2018,66(3):223-238.
[124]ARROYO-RAMIREZ E,CHOU R L,FREEDMAN J,et al.The reach of a long-arm stapler:Calling in microaggressions in the LIS field through zine work[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):107-130.
[125]ESPINAL I,SUTHERLAND T, ROH C.A holistic approach for inclusive librarianship:decentering whiteness in our profession[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):147-162.
[126]ALABI J.From hostile to inclusive:Strategies for improving the racial climate of academic libraries[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):131-146.
[127]BROWN J, FERRETTI J A., LEUNG S,et al.We here:Speaking our truth[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):163-181.
[128]WHEELER M B, SMITH D. Race and leadership in library and information science education:A study of African American administrators[J].Library Trends, 2018,67(1):23-38.
[129]COLLINS A M.Language, power,and oppression in the LIS diversity void[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):39-51.
[130]CLARKE R I. How we done it good:Research through design as a legitimate methodology for librarianship[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018, 40(3-4):255-261.
[131]WIDDERSHEIM M M. Historical case study:A research strategy for diachronic analysis[J].Library and Information Science Research,2018,40(2):144-152.
[132]NOLIN J M, AXELSSON A-S,DORACIC A,et al.Response to cult of the “I”[J].Journal of Documentati on,2018,74(3):668-671.
[133]ADLER M, HARPER L M. Race and Ethnicity in classification systems:Teaching knowledge organization from a social justice perspective[J].Library Trends,2018,67(1):52-73.
[134]马海群.2016-2018年我国图书馆学学术热点及发展趋势[J].图书馆理论与实践,2017(12):1-4+28.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |