经椎间孔入路椎体间融合术对退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效观察

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Clinical Effect of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Treatment of Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis 作者：赵兵 ; 崔易坤 ; 尹振宇 ; 宋晋刚 ; 羊刚毅 英文作者：ZHAO Bing;CUI Yi-kun;YIN Zhen-yu;SONG Jin-gang;YANG Gang-yi;Department of Spinal Surgery,Central Hospital of Mianyang; 关键词：经后方入路椎体间融合术 ; 经椎间孔入路椎体间融合术 ; 退变性腰椎管狭窄症 英文关键词：Posterior lumbar interbody fusion;;Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion;;Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis 中文刊名：HBGF 英文刊名：Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army 机构：绵阳市中心医院脊柱外科; 出版日期：2019-03-28 出版单位：解放军医药杂志 年：2019 期：v.31;No.225 基金：四川省卫计委普及应用项目(16PJ191) 语种：中文; 页：HBGF201903023 页数：4 CN：03 ISSN：13-1406/R 分类号：102-105

摘要

目的观察经后方入路椎体间融合术(PLIF)与经椎间孔入路椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年3月—2017年7月92例退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者的临床资料,根据手术方法的不同分为研究组与对照组,每组46例。研究组给予TLIF,对照组给予PLIF。比较2组的临床疗效、手术相关指标及并发症发生情况,并比较治疗前后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)。结果研究组的疗效优良率高于对照组,手术时间和卧床时间较对照组缩短,术中出血量较对照组减少,且并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后1、3、6个月,2组的VAS和ODI评分均低于治疗前,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 TLIF治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效显著,具有创伤小、出血量少、恢复时间短、症状改善显著以及正常活动功能恢复好的优点。
        Objective To observe clinical effects of posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) in treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods Clinical data of 92 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis admitted during March 2015 and July 2017 was retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were divided into study group and control group(n=46 for each group) according to different surgical methods. Study group was treated with TLIF, while control group was treated with PLIF. In two groups, clinical efficacy, related surgical indicators and incidence rate of complications were compared, and scores of pain visual analogue scales(VAS) and Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI) before and after treatment were also compared. Results Compared with those in control group, in study group, excellent and good rate of clinical effect was significantly higher, while operative time and bed-rest time were significantly shorter, and values of intraoperative bleeding volume and incidence rate of complications were significantly lower(P<0.05). After treatment for 1, 3 and 6 months, VAS and ODI scores were significantly lower than those before treatment in two groups, and the scores in study group were significantly lower than those in control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Clinical effect of TLIF in treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is significant, and it has advantages such as little trauma, less bleeding volume, short recovery time, significant symptoms improvement and good recovery of normal activity function.

引文

[1] 许鹏,史建刚,叶晓健,等.伴根性症状的退变性腰椎管狭窄症的选择性治疗策略[J].中国医药导报,2016,13(18):97-100.
    [2] 杨佳宁,宋有鑫,赵丽丽,等.后路Quadrant通道下MIS-TLIF微创手术治疗老年退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2016,24(5):395-400.
    [3] 贾杰海,张静,丁宇,等.老年退变性腰椎管狭窄症的治疗进展[J].中国中医急症,2016,25(6):1077-1080.
    [4] 王理康,李战武.腘窝囊肿致间歇性跛行误诊为腰椎管狭窄症[J].临床误诊误治,2014,27(1):63.
    [5] 吴浩,王曲,张璨,等.微创经椎间孔入路腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症伴退变性腰椎侧弯[J].中华神经外科杂志,2016,32(12):1199-1203.
    [6] 秦小虎,薛路,童迅.闭塞性动脉硬化症误诊为腰椎管狭窄症临床探析[J].临床误诊误治,2015,28(11):12-14.
    [7] Lee W C, Park J Y, Kim K H, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in multilevel: comparison with conventional transforaminal interbody fusion[J].World Neurosurg, 2016,85:236-243.
    [8] 王亮,曾建成,宋跃明,等.经皮椎板间入路内窥镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2017,27(3):200-206.
    [9] 夏可周,郭卫春.退变性腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗中不同术式的应用进展[J].山东医药,2016,56(39):103-106.
    [10] 邓必权,胡华,滕宇,等.经后路单侧椎板入路双侧减压椎间隙植骨融合内固定改良术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症[J].中国临床研究,2017,30(3):306-309.
    [11] 高懋峰,杨旭,邹俊,等.椎间孔入路腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效[J].江苏医药,2016,42(8):943-945.
    [12] 唐果,薛锋,潘明芒,等.退变性腰椎管狭窄症的治疗研究进展[J].山东医药,2016,56(32):101-103.
    [13] 李强,赵永生,陈修福,等.经后路单侧椎板入路双侧减压椎间隙植骨融合内固定改良术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症临床研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(23):191-192,196.
    [14] Zhang D, Mao K, Qiang X. Comparing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis: a STROBE-compliant observational study[J].Medicine, 2017,96(37):e8011.
    [15] 林磊,李般若,王青平,等.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术两种融入方式治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效对比研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2017,16(12):1210-1212.
    [16] 白亮,庄全魁.微创经椎间孔入路椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的近期疗效和安全性分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2018,24(3):197-200.
    [17] 余将明,马俊,谢宁,等.斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术间接减压治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的早期疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2017,37(16):972-979.
    [18] 陈文俊,卞恒杰,吕锦瑜,等.极外侧椎体间融合术在腰椎退变性疾病的应用[J].江苏医药,2017,43(8):605-607.
    [19] 秦超,熊健,文文,等.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术两种入路方式治疗单节段退变性腰椎滑脱的疗效比较[J].重庆医学,2018,47(8):1117-1120.
    [20] 田伟,李加宁,韩骁,等.TLIF与PLIF治疗老年退变性腰椎滑脱并椎管狭窄症的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(17):1537-1540.