基于生态位视角的我国档案学科定位探究
|
摘要
文章运用生态学中的生态位理论,探讨我国档案学科在当今学科生态系统之中的现实生态定位及其提升路径。首先,结合生态位的态势理论测定我国档案学科现有生态定位,发现其趋同、模糊与被动的定位问题。其次,根据定位问题从生态位视角出发认为我国档案学科的定位应把握生态分离之特色定位、生态重叠之协调定位、生态集群之延伸定位的定位方向。最后,基于取食差异、协调共生与集群延伸的生态理念提出对我国档案学科定位的建构路径。
Based on Niche Theory in ecology, this paper explores the realistic ecological orientation and promotion path of archives discipline in the current discipline ecosystem in China.Firstly, the current ecological orientation of archives discipline in China is determined based on the niche situation theory, and the problem of convergence, ambiguity and passivity of the orientation are found. Secondly, from the perspective of niche, it is considered that the orientation of archives discipline in China should grasp the orientation of the characteristics of ecological separation, the coordinated orientation of ecological overlap and the extension orientation of ecological clusters.Finally, based on the ecological concepts of feeding differences, coordinating symbiosis and cluster extension, the construction path of the orientation of archives discipline in China is put forward.
Based on Niche Theory in ecology, this paper explores the realistic ecological orientation and promotion path of archives discipline in the current discipline ecosystem in China.Firstly, the current ecological orientation of archives discipline in China is determined based on the niche situation theory, and the problem of convergence, ambiguity and passivity of the orientation are found. Secondly, from the perspective of niche, it is considered that the orientation of archives discipline in China should grasp the orientation of the characteristics of ecological separation, the coordinated orientation of ecological overlap and the extension orientation of ecological clusters.Finally, based on the ecological concepts of feeding differences, coordinating symbiosis and cluster extension, the construction path of the orientation of archives discipline in China is put forward.
引文
[1]金波.数字档案馆生态系统研究[M].北京:学习出版社,2014:82-83.
[2]朱春全.生态位态势理论与扩充假说[J].生态学报,1997(3):324-332.
[3]李刚,孙建军.从边缘到中心:信息管理研究的学科范型嬗变[J].中国图书馆学报,2008(5):5-13.
[4]马双双,古琬莹,高胜楠.改革开放后我国档案学学科演变过程及特点[J].档案与建设,2018(8):8-12.
[5][8]潘连根.正确认识档案学的学科地位[J].浙江档案,2018(9):16-18.
[6]张江珊.档案学独立学科地位支点的理性思考[J].山西档案,2012(5):54-57.
[7]宋魏巍.档案学跨学科研究评析[J].档案学通讯,2011(4):58-61.
[9]顾丽娅.档案学科“去档案化”现象及对策研究[J].北京档案,2016(3):18-20.
[10]谭琤培.图情档一体化新论[J].浙江档案,2000(3):10-11.
[11]裴友泉,裴斐.学科、学者与学术——关于档案学研究的哲学思考[J].档案学通讯,2013(2):4-7.
[12]刘家真,廖茹.档案学的本质特征与可持续发展[J].档案学研究,2010(6):4-8.
[13]周璐.从数据统计看中国档案学的学科地位[J].档案与建设,2009(10):14-18.
[14]周林兴.中国档案学术生态研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2013:19-20.
[2]朱春全.生态位态势理论与扩充假说[J].生态学报,1997(3):324-332.
[3]李刚,孙建军.从边缘到中心:信息管理研究的学科范型嬗变[J].中国图书馆学报,2008(5):5-13.
[4]马双双,古琬莹,高胜楠.改革开放后我国档案学学科演变过程及特点[J].档案与建设,2018(8):8-12.
[5][8]潘连根.正确认识档案学的学科地位[J].浙江档案,2018(9):16-18.
[6]张江珊.档案学独立学科地位支点的理性思考[J].山西档案,2012(5):54-57.
[7]宋魏巍.档案学跨学科研究评析[J].档案学通讯,2011(4):58-61.
[9]顾丽娅.档案学科“去档案化”现象及对策研究[J].北京档案,2016(3):18-20.
[10]谭琤培.图情档一体化新论[J].浙江档案,2000(3):10-11.
[11]裴友泉,裴斐.学科、学者与学术——关于档案学研究的哲学思考[J].档案学通讯,2013(2):4-7.
[12]刘家真,廖茹.档案学的本质特征与可持续发展[J].档案学研究,2010(6):4-8.
[13]周璐.从数据统计看中国档案学的学科地位[J].档案与建设,2009(10):14-18.
[14]周林兴.中国档案学术生态研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2013:19-20.